Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ABSTRACT
Cable supported Bridge structures have External appearance resembles cable-stayed
distinctive dynamic behavior compared to any bridge – but structural characteristics are
other type of bridge, especially the dynamic comparable to those of conventional girder
behavior. Support excitations sets structure to bridge
vibrate; cable excitations can be caused by rain, The Girder Depth are lesser than that of
wind or stochastical vibration due to plying conventional girder bridges
vehicles or due to vibration of deck. In modern The stay cables (prestressing tendons outside
cable-stayed / Extradosed bridges, the stay cables the girder) need no tension adjustment
are often closely spaced, with the cable lengths necessary for cable-stayed bridges, and can be
and tensions gradually varying from position to treated as usual tendons as in girder bridges
position. The natural frequencies of their self- The height of pylon is half as that of cable-
vibrations are therefore likely to be rather closely stayed bridge and hence easier to construct
placed as well. Such boundary-induced vibrations With small stress fluctuation under live load
of the stay cables are likely to complicate the the anchorage method for stay cables can be
overall dynamic behavior of the bridge. The paper same as that of tendons inside girder and
focuses on dynamic behavior of Extradosed thereby achieve economy
Bridges, dynamic behavior of Extradosed cables
and possible interaction resulting into coupled
mode of vibrations.
1424 | P a g e
M V Sardesai, Dr A K Desai / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications
(IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
Vol. 3, Issue 4, Jul-Aug 2013, pp.1424-1429
position. The natural frequencies of their self- Now, consider an element i-j of length L of a beam
vibrations are therefore likely to be rather closely on an elastic foundation as shown in Figure.7 having
placed as well. Such boundary-induced vibrations of a uniform width b and a linearly varying thickness
the stay cables are likely to complicate the overall h(x) It will be a simple matter to consider an element
dynamic behavior of the bridge. Although there is no having a linearly varying width if the need arises.
universal agreement about the causes of vibration, Neglecting axial deformations this beam on an elastic
possible explanations essentially follow two different foundation element has two degrees of freedom per
ways of thinking. According to the first rationale, node a lateral translation and a rotation about an axis
vibrations are due to external environmental actions normal to the plane of the paper and thus possesses a
acting directly on the stays. In particular, the wind- total of four degrees of freedom. The (4x4) stiffness
tunnel experiments by Hikami and Shiraishi (1988) matrix k of the element is obtained by adding the
have shown that it is the combination of rain and (4x4) stiffness matrices kB, kF and kQ pertaining to the
wind, rather than their separate action that provokes usual beam bending stiffness and foundation stiffness
aerodynamic instability. The excitation is due to the and stiffness due to prestressing force (Q)
change in shape of the stay-sheath profile, produced respectively Since, there are four end displacements
by the wind-induced formation of a water rill at the or degrees of freedom a cubic variation in
extrados of the cable. A completely different displacement is assumed in the form
explanation points instead to an interaction between v Aa Eq. (1)
the vibrations of the stays and the oscillations of their Where, A= (1 x x2 x3) and aT= (a1 a2 a3 a4)
extremities anchored to girder and pylons. If some (Displacement variation within element)
resonance conditions get satisfied, energy can flow to The four degrees of freedom corresponding to the
the stays and provoke their large-amplitude displacements v1, v3 and the rotations v2 v4 at the
oscillations. longitudinal nodes are given by
q=Ca (Nodal displacements) Eq. (2)
II. GOVERNING EQUATIONS Where qT= (v0 v1 v2 v3) and C is the connectivity
A) Vibration of structure matrix for an element ij between x=0 and x=L as
When finite element is used, each stay cable given in Figure 2
is modeled as either a single truss element with an From equations (Eq.1) and (Eq.2)
equivalent modulus or number of cable elements with V=AC-1q Eq. (3)
the original modulus. The deck and tower are If E is the Young|s modulus and I=bh(x)3 /12 is the
modeled as Bernoulli-Euler beam elements with axial second moment of area of the beam Cross-section
forces due to prestress imparted by horizontal about an axis normal to the plane of the paper the
component of cable force due to its shallow cables. bending moment M in the element is given by
2v
I. STIFFNESS AND MASS MATRIX FORMULATION FOR M D DBC 1q Eq. (4)
EXTRADOSED BRIDGE x 2
1425 | P a g e
M V Sardesai, Dr A K Desai / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications
(IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
Vol. 3, Issue 4, Jul-Aug 2013, pp.1424-1429
2U f B) Vibration of Cables
kf Eq. (10) i) With equivalent modulus
d 2 In global analysis of cable stayed /
From equations (Eq.3) in (Eq.10) we get, Extradosed bridges, one common practice is to model
l each cable as a single truss element with an
k f AT kfAdx (Elemental) Eq. (11) equivalent modulus to allow for sag. The element
0 stiffness matrix in local coordinates for such a cable
element can be written as,
Kf (C 1 )T kfC 1 (Assembled) Eq. (12)
1 0 1 0
Ac E eq 0 0 0 0
c. Stiffness due to prestressing force
Eq. (24)
The potential energy of prestressing force is given by, kc
l c 1 0 1 0
v
l 2
1
U Q Q dx Eq. (13) 0 0 0 0
2 0 x The equivalent modulus of elasticity is given be
Then the stiffness is given by, Ec
Eeq Eq. (25)
2U Q 1 ( wH c ) 2 Ac Ec / 12T 3
kQ Eq. (14) Where, lc is chord length, H c is the horizontal
d 2
Substituting equation (3) in (14) we get, projection length, Ac is the cross-sectional area, E c
l
is the effective material modulus of elasticity, w is
kQ AT kQ Adx Eq. (15)
the weight per unit length and T is the updated cable
0
tension of the cable. A certain cable profile has been
KQ (C 1 )T kQC 1 Eq. (16) assumed to account for the effect of cable sag.
However, once the equivalent modulus has been
Finally complete stiffness is given by, obtained, the profile will not have a role to play in the
final analysis, and hence the method cannot model
K K B K f KQ Eq. (17) transverse vibrations of the cable.
Element mass matrix is the equivalent nodal mass ii) With original modulus
that dynamically represents the actual distributed Another approach for accounting for the
mass of the element. This is kinetic energy of the transverse vibrations of cables is to model each cable
element. by number of cables elements with the original
l modulus. Following the sign conventions adopted by
T
1
v T dVv Eq. (18) Broughton and Ndumbara (1994), the element
20 incremental stiffness matrix in local coordinates can
Where, v = Lateral velocity and = mass density
be written as
E c Ac
Kc
q T C 1 T AT hxAdxC 1 q
l
L0 ( L0 e ) 2
T ( L0 u c ) 2 v ( L0 u c ) ( L0 u c ) 2 v ( L0 u c )
2 0
v ( L0 u c ) v ( L0 u c ) vc
2 2
vc
Eq. (19) ( L0 u c ) 2 v ( L0 u c ) ( L0 u c ) 2 v ( L0 u c )
Then, the mass matrix is given by,
v( L0 u c ) vc v ( L0 u c )
2 2
mC
vc
1 T 1
m C Eq. (20) T
l ( L0 e) 3
and m AT hxAdx Eq. (21) vc
2
v ( L0 u c ) vc v ( L0 u c )
2
0
v ( L0 u c )( L0 u c ) v ( L0 u c ) ( L0 u c ) 2
2
for free vibration of this beam,
M q C q K q 0 vc v ( L0 u c ) v ( L0 u c )
2 2
vc
Eq. (22)
v( L0 u c ) ( L0 u c ) v( L0 u c ) ( L0 u c ) 2
2
and for forced vibration,
M q Cq K q f N 1 f0 Where the updated element basic tension T and the
Eq. (26)
1426 | P a g e
M V Sardesai, Dr A K Desai / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications
(IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
Vol. 3, Issue 4, Jul-Aug 2013, pp.1424-1429
T0 is the original cable element pre-tension, L0 is Since, Extradosed bridges take part in an
intermediate zone between prestressed bridges and
the original cable element length, and u c and v c are, cable-stayed bridges, their structural behavior may be
respectively, the relative displacements of one node similar to these kinds of typologies, depending on
acting along and perpendicular to the cable chord design criteria adopted during the project stage.
with respect to the other node. Generally a rigid deck Extradosed bridge shall have a
similar behavior to the prestressed bridges, thus
iii) Mass matrix for cable avoiding high stress oscillations of stay cables and,
The cable element mass matrix is the same for both consequently, avoiding fatigue conditions associated
the single-element and multiple-element modeling with anchorages and tendons present in a slender
methods. The mass matrix is given as follows, deck Extradosed bridge, which behavior is quite
2 0 1 0 close to the cable-stayed bridge. In order to
analytically study dynamic structural behavior with
mcc 0 2 0 1 Eq. (29)
mc respect to ground acceleration numerical studies were
6 1 0 2 0 conducted for free vibration on typical Extradosed
Bridge.
0 1 0 2 Nonlinear static analysis of a Extradosed
In which mcc is the total mass of the cable element Bridge is first performed to get the internal forces in
the bridge deck, towers and stay cables. Non-
C) Vibration of stay cables linearities such as those arising from the sag of stay
To demonstrate the abilities of various cables, beam-column behaviour of the bridge deck
methods in predicting local cable vibrations, each and towers, and geometrical large displacements can
stay cable was analyzed as an inclined stay cable be taken into account in the static analysis. The
fixed/pinned at both ends to evaluate the natural global stiffness matrix and global mass matrix are
frequencies of local vibrations. It is noted however then available following the nonlinear static analysis.
that the real situation is slightly different, as the end The subspace iteration algorithm or similar may
anchorages themselves are movable. The first therefore be employed to determine the natural
symmetric and anti-symmetric in-plane transverse frequencies and their corresponding mode shapes.
vibration frequencies in radians per second can be Two arrangement of Extradosed Bridge structures are
computed, respectively, as considered for numerical studies, the details of which
are as given in table-1. Software SAP-2000 has been
* T For symmetric in-plane vibration
used for dynamic analysis of Bridge as well as stay
l m cables. The mode shapes and natural frequency are
and, found out. The Type-1 model represents typical
2 T Extradosed Bridge with span to pylon height ratio of
For anti-symmetric in-plane
l m 10 and the deck thickness is considered to be L/35 at
vibration, support and L/55 at midspan as given by H. Otsuka et
3
al. (2002), the angle of inclination of cables is
Where, tan 4 *
* *
1427 | P a g e
M V Sardesai, Dr A K Desai / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications
(IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
Vol. 3, Issue 4, Jul-Aug 2013, pp.1424-1429
1428 | P a g e
M V Sardesai, Dr A K Desai / International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications
(IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
Vol. 3, Issue 4, Jul-Aug 2013, pp.1424-1429
REFERENCES
[1] Katsuhiko Takami and Sumio Hamada
(2005); Behavior of extradosed bridge with
composite Girder; ASCE / Journal Of
Bridge Engineering
[2] H. Otsuka, T. Wakasa, J. Ogata, W. Yabuki
and D. Takemura (2003); Comparison of
structural characteristics for different types
of cable-supported prestressed concrete
bridges; Structural Concrete Mar-2002
[3] F T K Au, Y S Cheng, Y K Cheung, D Y
Zheng (2000); On determination of natural
frequency and mode shapes of cable stayed
bridges; Applied methametical modeling
[4] A K Desai, J A Desai, H S Patil (2005); Co-
relationship of Seismic (EDR) & (PGA) for
Cable Stayed Bridge; NMB media
[5] Anil K Chopra. (2003), “Dynamics of
Structures”. Pearson Education, Inc. Second
edition 1 – 844, Singapore
[6] Ito M. (1991), “Cable Stayed Bridges” –
Recent Developments and their Future”,
Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. 1 – 356,
Amsterdam.
[7] Gimisng N. J. (1983), “Cable Supported
Bridges: Concept & Design”, John Wiley &
Sons, 1 – 257, New York.
[8] Y. Hikami, N. Shiraishi, Rain-wind
induced vibrations of cables in cable
stayed bridges, Journal of Wind
Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 29
(1988) 409–418.
[9] P. Broughton, P Ndumbaro, The analysis of
cable and catanary structures, Thomas
Telford, London, 1994
1429 | P a g e