Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
12404
...........................................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................ elongation, leaf shape, growth rate, flowering times and pho-
tosynthesis rate of plants.
ABSTRACT
The genus Halimeda is an interesting model organism as it
Plasticity gives plants the ability to adapt their morphology is well studied taxonomically. However, most sections within
and growth to various environments. Environmental factors the genus Halimeda (e.g., Opuntia J. Agardh ex De Toni,
can lead to changes in the growth forms of algae. Halimeda
Halimeda J. Agardh ex De Toni and Rhipsalis J. Agardh ex De
opuntia was used as a model organism to determine the
effects of highly irradiated and shade conditions in the field Toni) have high morphological plasticity and show morpholog-
and its responses to low light conditions in the laboratory, ical variations that appear to correlate with habitats
which are known to be some of the main factors driving its (Verbruggen & Kooistra 2004; Verbruggen 2005; Verbruggen
morphological plasticity. To investigate the morphological and et al. 2005a; Pongparadon et al. 2015). Halimeda
anatomical characteristics of the species, a total of 61 charac- section Opuntia is also known to be morphologically plastic
teristics and 54 samples from Thailand, Japan and Indonesia (Verbruggen et al. 2006; Dijoux et al. 2012; Pongparadon
were examined. In addition, we also tested the response under
et al. 2015), and this section includes Halimeda opuntia,
different light conditions in the laboratory. A phylogenetic tree
Halimeda distorta and Halimeda hederacea. Pongparadon
was constructed using the tufA marker to confirm the species
identification. We found that the thallus forms, branching pat- et al. (2015) reported that H. opuntia populations in Thai
terns and segment shapes and sizes responded to the differ- waters were genetically identical but showed morphological
ent light conditions. A brittle thallus network was found under variations among populations as their segment shapes differed
shade conditions with low light intensity, while a compact between shallow and deep water. In addition, Littler and Lit-
thallus form was found under highly irradiated conditions. The tler (2000) and Kooistra and Verbruggen (2005) reported that
H. opuntia segment shape was reniform under highly irradi- H. opuntia had compact reniform segments in wave-exposed
ated conditions, but its segments were adapted to be deeply
areas and tripartite segments in sheltered lagoons.
trilobed in the lower thallus and tripartite shape in the upper
This morphological plasticity could be a key prerequisite
thallus under shade conditions. The segment size also
adapted; the segments in shaded areas were longer than those for the potential adaptation and survival of populations in het-
in sunny areas, which might have helped them increase their erogeneous habitats. H. opuntia, which is commonly found in
thallus height to ensure exposure to the high light habitat. both the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific Oceans and is one of the
This morphological variation and plasticity expanded our most common and widespread species in both regions
understanding of the range of H. opuntia plasticity present in (Guiry & Guiry 2013), was the focus of this study. H. opuntia
the field and could help explain why this species is common is distributed in various habitats, e.g., sandy beaches, reef
and successfully colonizes various habitats worldwide.
flats and subtidal reef areas, while molecular data indicate
that morphological plasticity occurs within species
Key words: adaptation, light irradiance, morphological varia-
(Pongparadon et al. 2015). We hypothesize that this wide dis-
tions, phenotypic plasticity, species boundary.
tribution and high abundance of H. opuntia populations may
........................................................................................
be related to their potential for morphological plasticity among
populations. A series of morphometric measurements and the
chloroplast-encoded tufA gene were used to explore the spe-
cies plasticity of H. opuntia. We examined (i) the environmen-
INTRODUCTION tal factors that could influence H. opuntia morphological and
anatomical variations in the field, (ii) the H. opuntia morpho-
Phenotypic plasticity is the ability of an individual organism to
logical and anatomical variations between highly irradiated
respond to changes in environmental conditions by changing
its morphology or physiology (Schmalhausen 1949; Bradshaw
1965; Schlichting 1986). Phenotypic adaptation is a neces- .........................................................................................
sity for sessile organisms such as plant, which allows them to *To whom correspondence should be addressed.
continually adapt to the conditions of their local environ- Email: anchana.p@psu.ac.th
ments, for example, light intensity, temperature, depth and Communicating Editor: Tatyana Klochkova
nutrients. These factors can influence the morphology, shoot Received 22 November 2018; accepted 29 July 2019.
and shade conditions, and (iii) the morphological and anatom- Darriba et al. 2012). The ML tree was constructed using
ical plasticity of H. opuntia that occurred in response to differ- RAxML (Stamatakis 2006) with the G + I model. Support for
ent light irradiation levels under laboratory conditions. branches was obtained from 1000 bootstrap replications. BI
analysis was performed using MrBayes v.3.2.1 (Ronquist &
Huelsenbeck 2003), with a random starting tree run for
3 000 000 generations, sampling tree every 1000 genera-
MATERIALS AND METHODS tions and a burn-in of 300 trees.
Fig. 1. Morphology and anatomy of plants growing in highly irradiated conditions. (a) and (b) Thallus characteristics. (c) Reniform shape of lower
segments. (d) Reniform shape of upper segments. (e) Surface pattern; rounded polygonal. (f) Utricle layers; three to four. (g) and (h) Node type;
completed fusion in two or three siphons. Scale bar: Fig. a-b = 1 cm, Fig. e-h = 50 μm. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Thallus and segment forms upper segment was higher under the shade condition than under
the highly irradiated condition: 0.826 0.134 cm and
A compact thallus was found under highly irradiated conditions,
0.627 0.082 cm, respectively (P < 0.01, Fig. 3c, Table S1 in
while a lax thallus was found under shade conditions. Both the
the Supporting Information). The lower segments also showed
upper and lower segments in each environment also showed
significant size differences. The maximum width under the shade
shape differentiation in which the shape of the upper segment
condition was larger than that under the highly irradiated condi-
under highly irradiated conditions was reniform, while it was
tion: 0.848 0.017 cm and 0.736 0.015 cm, respectively
mostly tripartite with a stalk and sometimes reniform under shade
(P < 0.001, Fig. 3d, Table S1 in the Supporting Information).
conditions. The lower segment was reniform under highly irradi-
The height of the lower segment under the shade condition was
ated conditions, whereas it was deeply trilobed and tripartite and
also higher than that under the highly irradiated condition:
sometimes cylindrical under shade conditions (Table S1 in the
0.654 0.155 cm and 0.476 0.079 cm, respectively
Supporting Information).
(P < 0.001, Fig. 3e, Table S1 in the Supporting Information),
and the height:width ratio of the lower segments was higher
Segment size
under the shade conditions than under the highly irradiated con-
The maximum width and height of the upper segment were dition: 0.849 0.133 cm and 0.63 0.056 cm, respectively
affected by light intensity, and the segments under shade condi- (P < 0.001, Fig. 3f, Table S1 in the Supporting Information).
tions were higher (taller) than those under highly irradiated condi-
tions (P < 0.001, Fig. 3a-b, Table S1 in the Supporting
Information). The maximum width under the shade condition Relationship between morpho-anatomical
was larger than that under the highly irradiated condition:
variability and environmental factors
0.853 0.022 cm and 0.749 0.007 cm, respectively. The
average heights of the segments under the shade and highly irra- A possible correlation between morphological and anatomical
diated conditions were 0.717 0.162 cm and variations within H. opuntia species and environmental factors
0.521 0.168 cm, respectively. The height:width ratio of the was determined using CCA (Fig. 4; Table S2 in the Supporting
Information). There was a significant relationship between that included sandy beaches, reef flats and shallow water.
morph-anatomical variability and environmental factors The length and width of the segment and ratio were positively
(P < 0.001), and the eigenvalues of axes 1 and 2 were 0.172 correlated with the intertidal zone, whereas the length and
and 0.0005, respectively. Thallus and segment forms were width were negatively correlated with low light intensity and
positively correlated with low light intensity and habitat under habitats under rock or coral. On the other hand, other charac-
rock or coral and negatively correlated with the intertidal zone teristics were not correlated with these environmental factors.
Fig. 4. Characteristic distributions of H. opuntia among environmental variables based on the canonical correspondence analysis ordina-
tion. Labelled lines indicate the direction along which each variable changes most. Filled circles = highly irradiated samples, Open cir-
cles = shade samples and Black squares = characters. Abbreviations: THForm, thallus form; LoSgForm, Lower segment form; LoSgH,
Lower segment height; LoSgMW, Lower segment maximum width; LoSgRatio, Lower segment length over width ratio; UpSgForm, Upper
segment form; UpSgH, Upper segment height; UpSgMW, Upper segment maximum width; and UpSgRatio, Upper segment length over
width ratio.
Plasticity response to light intensity The segment width decreased after growth under a low light
intensity (0.767 0.011 cm and 0.564 0.022 cm before
Before the transferring experiment, the thallus form was com- and after, respectively; Fig. 6a; Table S3 in the Supporting
pact and dense with hard and highly calcified reniform seg- Information), while the newly grown segment height increased
ments (Fig. 5a–e). After 3 months, the form and size of the (0.632 0.016 cm; Fig. 6b; Table S3 in the Supporting
thallus and segment changed after the samples were trans- Information). Moreover, the height:width ratio after the experi-
ferred to the aquarium tank under low light conditions ment was higher than that before the low light experiment
(Fig. 5f–r). The form or size of the old segments did not (1.312 0.088 cm and 0.597 0.012 cm, respectively;
change, while the thalli and segment size, form and branching Fig. 6c; Table S3 in the Supporting Information). The new
of the new growth segments differed in the first month. The lower segment shape also changed from reniform and broad
thalli increased in height, and their forms changed from com- tripartite (Fig. 6d,e) to cylindrical, deeply bilobed, deeply tri-
pact thalli that usually exhibited trichotomous branching lobed and tripartite (Fig. 6l–r), and the segments were signifi-
(Fig. 5a) to loosely brittle networks of thalli that were mostly cantly smaller in size (P < 0.001, Table S3 in the Supporting
arranged in a row and sometimes with dichotomous branching Information). The average width of the newly grown segments
(Fig. 5f). The new upper segment forms changed from reni- decreased from before to after the low light experiment
form (Fig. 5b-c) to various deeply trilobed shapes, tripartite (0.767 0.011 cm and 0.564 0.022 cm, respectively;
and sometimes cylindrical (Fig. 5g–k). The segment size was Fig. 6d; Table S3 in the Supporting Information), while the
significantly different before and after the low light experi- segment height increased (0.435 0.008 cm and
ment (P < 0.001, Table S3 in the Supporting Information). 0.561 0.013 cm, respectively; Fig. 6e; Table S3 in the
DISCUSSION
distinguished. Thus, using anatomical characteristics clearly changing the branching pattern. H. opuntia had varying mor-
helped in identifying this species. phological plasticity in response to light levels. A previous
The variations within the H. opuntia species were low com- study on H. opuntia showed similar patterns in segment size
pared to those in other Halimeda species. H. opuntia has only and shape. The populations in low light levels have loose
two morphs and showed plasticity in only the morphological thalli, small segments and tri-partite segments (Kooistra &
variations in thallus and segment size and shape, while Verbruggen 2005). H. opuntia segments from the inshore
Halimeda macroloba has more morpho-anatomical variability patch reefs were large, and the thallus form was more upright
that is affected by water depth and light in terms of several than that in the population from the offshore spur and groove
characteristics, such as holdfast type, segment size and area (Yñiguez et al. 2010). Additionally, in other species,
shape, peripheral utricle patterns as seen from the surface such as H. macroloba, thallus and segment sizes are large in
view, layers of utricles and shapes of the primary utricle subtidal zones and low light intensity conditions
(Pongparadon et al. 2017). In addition, Halimeda (Pongparadon et al. 2015). Likewise, in H. tuna, the mature
heteromorpha is another species that has high variation within segments from the deep and low light areas were wider and
the species. This species is large and densely ramified in longer than those in shallow and highly irradiated areas
extremely sheltered bays but has large, trilobed segments and (Vroom et al. 2003; Neustupa & Nemcova 2018).
lax branching on sheltered fore-reef slopes (Verbruggen et al. Moreover, light environments in temperate coastal systems
2006). These characteristics could also lead to mis- have highly variable irradiance due to shading, depth gradi-
identification as Halimeda incrassata or Halimeda ents, water turbidity and sublittoral habitat and temporally
melanesica; however, the combination of anatomical charac- variable irradiance due to circadian and seasonal scales (Kirk
teristics, ecological habitat and geographic distribution could 1994; Talarico & Maranzana 2000). Irradiance also affects
help resolve the identification issue. morphological plasticity. For example, the marine algae
Asparagopsis armata displays light-induced plasticity in terms
of size and shape, which is expressed as few branches
Ecological factors and their morphological coupled with branch elongation under reduced irradiance
(Monro & Poore 2005). Moreover, algal morphology responds
plasticity and adaptations
to irradiance at the level of the individual thallus (Fischer
Light intensity was the main factor driving H. opuntia morpho- et al. 2004). Collado-Vides (2002) reported that the morpho-
logical plasticity, while habitat type, depth and zonation were logical variation among natural populations of the green alga
less likely to influence morphology, such as thallus branching Caulerpa prolifera showed phalanx-type individuals in sunny
pattern, segment form and size. The correlation of H. opuntia areas and guerrilla-type individuals in shaded ones.
with environmental factors is relatively low in comparison to The calcification rate and CaCO3 contents of Halimeda
H. macroloba, which shows high eigenvalues and responses to were decreased under low light intensities (Castro-Sanguino
many environmental conditions, such as light intensity, depth et al. 2016). H. opuntia had a low percentage of CaCO3 when
and substrate type (Pongparadon et al. 2017). A compact it grew under very low light conditions in the shading experi-
thallus with ribbed reniform segments was found in highly ment. The calcification process was activated after photosyn-
irradiated conditions, and in shade conditions, especially thesis began in the daytime when the seawater pH increased
under rocks or coral in the subtidal zone, the thalli changed in the intercellular spaces of its siphon (de Beer and Larkum
to lax branching, such as a network with deeply trilobed lower 2001). Under low light conditions, the photosynthesis rate
segments and ribbed reniform or tripartite upper segments. and calcification rate in H. opuntia were than those under
Most segments showed a stalk zone that led to a larger size high light conditions. This scenario has previously been dem-
than the segments with lax branching and a higher thallus. onstrated in H. macroloba and Halimeda borneensis, where
This increase in size with high and narrow segments possibly high light intensities (500 and 900 μmol photons m−2 s−1)
occurred to increase the branch length to expose the organism rather than low light intensity (50 μmol photons m−2 s−1) were
sunlight outside the shade zone. Moreover, the compact thal- the best conditions to promote photosynthesis and calcifica-
lus and smaller segment size of Halimeda in highly irradiated tion in Halimeda (Kaewsrikhaw et al. 2016; Prathep et al.
conditions might help alleviate photoinhibition under the 2018). In contrast, extremely high light irradiation affected
extremely high light conditions of the intertidal zone and the photosynthesis rate and calcification rate by causing
exposed area. However, the population of H. opuntia changes photoinhibition and decreased photosynthetic and calcifica-
in response to other environmental parameters. This study tion performance (Vroom et al. 2003).
does not confirm the effects of wave exposure, herbivores or When H. opuntia was exposed to a high light intensity dur-
nutrients, which might also affect the morphological plastic- ing low tide, it adapted its chloroplast movements; its chloro-
ity, thallus form, segment size, segment weight, number of plast was withdrawn to the middle and lower parts of the
segments per thallus and CaCO3 content of H. opuntia. segment, and a white band appeared on its margin (Fig. 8a).
This phenomenon also occurred when the high-irradiance This chloroplast movement phenomenon also occurs in other
forms of H. opuntia were moved to a shaded aquarium, where Halimeda species, such as H. macroloba and H. borneensis
they adapted to brittle networks, such as those grown in (Fig. 8b,c). These chloroplast photo-movements are a
shaded zones or low light subtidal conditions. The morpholog- response to fluctuating light intensity that occurs in plants
ical adaptation of the species was confirmed by the changes such as angiosperms and algae. A chloroplast moves away
in its thallus forms and segment shapes and sizes when it was from the surface to the middle of the cell when exposed to
cultured under a light intensity that was lower than that in strong light intensity, and this process is called the chloro-
nature. The thalli grew by increasing the segment height and plast avoidance response. When chloroplasts are under low
light intensity, this process is called the chloroplast accumu- Drew, E. A. and Abel, K. M. 1990. Studies on Halimeda. III. A daily
lation response, which occurs when chloroplasts accumulate cycle of chloroplast migration within segments. Bot. Marina.
along the cell wall (Sato & Kadota 2007). Interestingly, chlo- 33: 31–45.
El-Manawy, I. M. and Shafik, M. A. 2008. Morphological characteriza-
roplast movement in Halimeda species also occurs at night,
tion of Halimeda (Lamouroux) from different biotopes on the Red
when segments change from a dark green color to an almost
Sea coral reefs on Egypt. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. 3: 532–8.
white color (Drew & Able 1990).
Fischer, M., Kleunen, M. V. and Schmid, B. 2004. Experimental life-
H. opuntia is a pantropical species that is widely distrib- history evolution: selection on growth form and its plasticity in a
uted and common in many habitats, while some Halimeda clonal plant. J. Evol. Biol. 17: 331–41.
species are restricted to narrow regions and specific habitats, Guiry, M. D. and Guiry, G. M. 2013. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic
such as H. minima, H. renschii and H. gigas, which are dis- publication, National University of Ireland, Galway [Cited on
tributed in only the Indo-Pacific region and subtidal zone. The 20 October 2018]. Available from: http://www.algaebase.org
ability of H. opuntia to adapt to different light environments Hillis-Colinvaux, L. 1980. Ecology and taxonomy of Halimeda: primary
might contribute to its colonization success. This species can producer of coral reefs. Adv. Mar. Biol. 17: 1–327.
survive in several habitats from sandy beaches in intertidal Kaewsrikhaw, R., Prathep, A., Darakrai, A. and Beer, S. 2016. Photo-
synthesis and calcification in two Halimeda species from Phuket,
zones to coral reefs in the subtidal area because they quickly
Thailand. Bot. Mar. 59: 187–92.
respond and change their thalli forms and segment shapes.
Kirk, J. T. O. 1994. Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic Ecosystems,
Moreover, the holdfast type of this species with several rhizoi- 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
dal axes is a special characteristic that adds to the success of Kooistra, W. H. C. F. and Verbruggen, H. 2005. Genetic patterns in
this species. This species can also produce multiple points of the calcified tropical seaweeds Halimeda opuntia, H. distorta,
a few rhizoids to attach to many kinds of substrates, such as H. hederacea, and H. minima (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta) provide
small rocks or coral, sand, dead coral and healthy coral. This insights in species boundaries and interoceanic dispersal.
study on morphological plasticity, genetic variations and envi- J. Phycol. 41: 177–87.
ronmental factors expanded our knowledge of the range of Littler, D. S. and Littler, M. M. 2000. Caribbean Reef Plants: An Iden-
plasticity and adaptation processes of organisms to various tification Guide to the Reef Plants of Caribbean, Bahamas, Florida
and Gulf of Mexico. Offshore Graphics, Washington, DC.
habitats and environments.
Monro, K. and Poore, A. G. B. 2005. Light quantity and quality induce
shade-avoiding plasticity in a marine macroalga. J. Evol. Biol. Res.
18: 426–35.
Neustupa, J. and Nemcova, Y. 2018. Morphological allometry con-
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS strains symmetricshape variation, but not asymmetry, of Halimeda
This work was supported by the Thailand Research Fund tuna (Bryopsidales, Ulvophyceae) segments. PLoS One 13:
(TRF) Grant for New Researcher, TRG6180010 and the Post- e0206492.
Pongparadon, S., Zuccarello, G. C., Phang, S. M., Kawai, H., Hanyuda, T.
doctoral Fellowship from Prince of Songkla University. The
and Prathep, A. 2015. Diversity of Halimeda (Chlorophyta) from the
additional field collections in Indonesia and Japan were
Thai–Malay peninsula. Phycologia 54: 349–66.
supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Pongparadon, S., Zuccarello, G. C. and Prathep, A. 2017. High morpho-
(JSPS: JSPS Core-to-core RENSEA Seagrass and Seaweed anatomical variability in Halimeda macroloba (Bryopsidales, Chlo-
Taxonomy workshop). The aquarium facility was supported by rophyta) in Thai waters. Phycol. Res. 65: 136–45.
the Phuket Marine Biological Center (PMBC), Phuket Province Posada, D. 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol.
and Biology Department, Faculty of Science, Prince of Song- Biol. Evol. 25: 1253–56.
kla University during the experiment. Prathep, A., Kaewsrikhaw, R., Mayakun, J. and Darakrai, A. 2018.
The effects of light intensity and temperature on the calcifica-
tion rate of Halimeda macroloba. J. Appl. Phycol. 30:
3405–12.
REFERENCES Ronquist, F. and Huelsenbeck, J. P. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian
Barton, E, S. 1901. The genus Halimeda. Uitkomsten op Zoologisch, phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 19:
Botanisch, Oceanographisch en Geologisch gebied verzameld in 1572–74.
Nederlandsch Oost-Indie 1899-1900. Siboga-Expeditie. 60: 32 pp. R Core Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical
Bradshaw, A. D. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plas- Computing. https://www.R-project.org.
ticity in plants. Adv. Genet. 13: 115–55. Sato, Y. and Kadota, A. 2007. Chloroplast movements in response to
Castro-Sanguino, C., Lovelock, C., and Mumby, P. J. 2016. The effect environmental signals. In Wise, R. R. and Hoober, J. K. (Eds). The
of structurally complex corals and herbivory on the dynamics of Structure and Function of Plastids. Advances in Photosynthesis
Halimeda. Coral Reefs. 35: 1–13. and Respiration, Vol. 23. Springer, Dordrecht.
Collado-Vides, L. 2002. Morphological plasticity of Caulerpa prolifera in Schlichting, C. D. 1986. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in
relation to growth form in a coral reef lagoon. Bot. Mar. 45: 123–9. plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 677–93.
de Beer, D. and Larkum, A. W. D. 2001. Photosynthesis and cal- Schmalhausen, I. I. 1949. Factors of Evolution: the Theory of
cificationin the calcifying alga Halimeda discoidea studied Stabilising Selection, Schmalhausen, I. I., Blakiston, PA.
withmicrosensors. Plant Cell Environ. 24: 1209–17. Stamatakis, A. 2006. Phylogenetic models of rate heterogeneity: a high
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. and Posada, D. 2012. performance computing perspective. Proceedings of the IPDPS2006,
jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel comput- HICOMB Workshop, Proceedings on CD. Rhodos, Greece.
ing. Nat. Methods. 9: 772. Talarico, L. and Maranzana, G. 2000. Light and adaptive responses in
Dijoux, L., Verbruggen, H., Mattio, L., Duong, N. and Payri, C. 2012. red macroalgae: an overview. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 56: 1–11.
Diversity of Halimeda (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta) in New Caledo- Taylor, W. R. 1950. Marine Algae of the Eastern Tropical and Subtrop-
nia: acombined morphological and molecular study. J. Phycol. 48: ical Coasts of the Americas. University of Michigan Press, Ann
1465–81. Arbor, MI, p. 870.
Thomson, D. and Henry, R. 1995. Single-step protocol for preparation SUPPORTING INFORMATION
of plant tissues for analysis by PCR. Biotechniques, 19: 394–400.
Verbruggen, H. 2005. Resegmenting Halimeda molecular and mor- Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online
phometric studies of species boundaries within a green algal version of this article at the publisher’s web-site:
genus. Dissertation Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Sci-
ences (Biology), Ghent University, Faculty of Sciences, Biology Appendix S1. H. opuntia specimens used for morpho-
Department, Ghent anatomical and genetic analysis in this study
Verbruggen, H., De Clerck, O., Cocquyt, E., Kooistra, W. H. C. F. and
Appendix S2. Environmental variables were measured in each
Coppejans, E. 2005b. Morphometric taxonomy of siphonous green
sampling sites.
algae: a methodological study within the genus Halimeda
(Bryopsidales). J. Phycol. 41: 126–39. Appendix S3. Lists of chloroplast tufAsequences were loaded
Verbruggen, H., De Clerck, O. and Coppejans, E. 2005a. Deviant seg- from Genbank.
ments hamper a morphometric approach towards Halimeda taxon-
omy. Cryptogam. Algo. 26: 259–74.
Appendi S4. List of morphology and anatomy characters
Verbruggen, H., De Clerck, O., Kooistra, W. H. C. F. and Appendix S5. Maximum likelihood topology of tufA gene
Coppejans, E. 2005c. Molecular and morphometric data pinpoint sequences of Halimeda. Numbers at the nodes are maximum-
species boundaries in Halimeda section Rhipsalis (Bryopsidales, likelihood bootstrap percentages followed by Bayesian infer-
Chlorophyta). J. Phycol. 41: 606–21. ence posterior probabilities
Verbruggen, H., De Clerck, O., N’Yeurt, A. D. R., Spalding, H. and
Vroom, P. S. 2006. Phylogeny and taxonomy of Halimeda Table S1. Characteristic of H. opuntia between sunny and
incrassata, including descriptions of H. kanaloana and shad conditions showing Mean SE and results of one-way
H. heteromorpha spp. nov. (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta). Eur. analysis of variance.
J. Phycol. 41: 337–62. Table S2. Canonical correspondence values and percent
Verbruggen, H. and Kooistra, W. H. C. F. 2004. Morphological charac-
explained variance associated with the first three axes for eco-
terization of lineages within the calcified tropical seaweed genus logical factors measured.
Halimeda (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta). Eur. J. Phycol. 39: 213–28.
Vroom, P., Smith1, C. M., Coyer, J. A. et al. 2003. Field biology of Table S3. Characteristic of H. opuntia between before and
Halimeda tuna (Bryopsidales, Chlorophyta) across a depth gradi- after experiment under the low light intensity showing
ent: comparative growth, survivorship, recruitment, and reproduc- Mean SE and results of one-way analysis of variance.
tion. Hydrobiologia 501: 149–66.
Yñiguez, A. T., McManus, J. W. and Collado-Vides, L. 2010. Capturing
Table S4. Characteristic of H. opuntia among experiment
the dynamics in benthic structures: environmental effects on mor-
under the natural, low and high light irradiated conditions
phology in the macroalgal genera Halimeda and Dictyota. Mar.
showing Mean SE and results of one-way analysis of
Ecol. Prog. Ser. 411: 17–32.
variance.