Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Includes index. Identifiers: LCCN 2015035237 | ISBN 9781849057424 (alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH:
Imagery (Psychology)--Therapeutic use. | Change (Psychology) Classification: LCC RC489.F35 T73
2016 | DDC 153.3/2--dc23 LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2015035237
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 978 1 84905 742 4
eISBN 978 1 78450 175 4
Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
Martin L. Rossman, M.D., Dipl. Ac., Faculty, UCSF Medical School; Private
Practice; Cofounder of the Academy for Guided Imagery
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
Leslie Davenport, M.A., M.S., MFT, Faculty, John F. Kennedy University; Faculty,
California Institute of Integral Studies; Founding Member of the Institute for
Health and Healing; Private Practice
Chapter 2: Style . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Rachel Naomi Remen, M.D., Founder and Director, Institute for the Study of
Health and Illness at Commonweal; Faculty, UCSF Medical School
Chapter 16: What You See Is Who You Become – Imagery in the Jewish
Tradition of Mussar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212
Alan Morinis, D.Phil., Dean of the Mussar Institute
Chapter 21: The Writer as Shaman – How Imagery Creates Worlds . . 273
Ruth L. Schwartz, Ph.D., Founder, The Writer as Shaman; Private Practice
Chapter 22: The Power of Imagination – Optimizing Sport Performance
Through Imagery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285
Phillip Post, Ph.D., CC-AASP, Associate Professor, New Mexico State University
C.G. Jung
Champion of the Imagination
Brian Dietrich
122
C.G. Jung—Champion of the Imagination 123
Archetypes
Although Jung described archetypes in a number of different ways,
he resisted attempts to limit their meaning to any single definition.
Nonetheless, one helpful way of describing them is to say that archetypes
are universal patterns of the psyche (Jung 1967). Existing across cultures
and throughout time, these transcendent forms without content (Hobson
2013) metaphorically reside in the collective unconscious. As such, they
cannot be directly experienced or fully known. Their existence, however,
can be inferred from archetypal images appearing in mythology, dreams,
and nondirective forms of guided imagery.
Jung identified two different categories of archetypes: archetypes of
transformation (or process) such as rebirth, the path toward wholeness,
and the transformative dark night of the soul; and archetypes appearing
as personified figures in fantasies, dreams, myths, and fairytales. From his
clinical work and mythological research, Jung identified certain archetypes
he thought exerted the most influence on conscious experience:
• the Persona—a social mask adopted to seek approval through
conformity (Jung 1966)
• the Shadow—the inferior aspects of the personality disavowed,
repressed, and projected onto others (Jung 1959b)
• the Anima/Animus—contrasexual soul-figures in men and
women that establish a relationship between the conscious and
unconscious, transmitting the creative psyche’s images to the
conscious mind
• the Mother—the Anima in her maternal aspect
• the Child—who represents the original wholeness of the psyche
• the Wise Old Man/Woman—a source of wisdom outside the ego’s
rational intelligence
• the Self—which Jung (1959a) referred to as “the god image in man”
(p.40). Representing psychic totality, the Self may be understood
as the greater personality beyond ordinary ego consciousness. As
the archetype of order, integrating the conscious and unconscious,
the Self stands behind the other archetypes and brings them into
appropriate relationship within the psyche.
C.G. Jung—Champion of the Imagination 125
Individuation
Jung recognized that the archetypes serve a teleological function, which
is to say they are purposeful and prospective: they propel a process of
self-realization that he called individuation, which is the full and unique
development of the personality. The teleological function of the psyche
suggests that organisms possess an inherent drive toward health and
wholeness.
Transcending Dualism
In his later writing Jung argued archetypes were psychoid in nature, which
means they are both psychological, manifesting in the psyche, and at the
same time physical, embedded in the material world of sensual nature
and biological instinct. His realization that archetypes are not merely
psychological phenomena but also constitute a tangible material reality
permeating the entire cosmos led Jung (1960a) to conclude that, “psyche
and matter…are two different aspects of one and the same thing (p.215),”
which only appear divided due to the limitations of ego consciousness.
Jung’s idea of the psychoid archetype as point of union where psyche and
matter are one and the same provides a theoretical foundation for guided
imagery and an imaginal locus for the mechanism of healing in mind/
body medicine.
Diverging Methods
Freud employed a method of free association, in which patients passively
observe and give voice to their stream of consciousness and reveal
their repressed personal secrets and hidden wishes. Jung’s method of
active imagination2 brings the ego and the autonomous archetypes into
dialogical relationship and provides a means of accessing the collective
unconscious. This facilitates the process of individuation: the path toward
wholeness and the full integration of the personality.
1971). For Jung, active fantasies generated by the interplay between the
conscious ego and the unconscious personality are a superior form of
psychic activity because they demonstrate the essential psychic unity of a
person’s individuality (Jung 1971).
According to Jung, the relationship between the ego and the
unconscious evinced through images and fantasy is of the greatest
importance because that collaboration expresses the Self archetype, which
orders and balances the psyche. Jung (1977) later clarified his terms and
asserted that, “Fantasy is more or less your own invention, and remains
on the surface of personal things and conscious expectations… [while]
active imagination…means the images have a life of their own and that
symbolic events develop according to their own logic” (p.171).
Neither Jung’s (1960a) method nor his theoretical understanding
of it resulted from a logical or rational process. Rather, they emerged
from a long, drawn-out, and at times painful process that he called his
“confrontation with the unconscious” (p.88), which consisted of a series
of tumultuous imaginal experiences he recorded in journals and later
elaborated in his Red Book.
All my works, all my creative activity, has come from those initial
fantasies and dreams. Everything that I accomplished in later life was
already contained in them…in the form of emotions and images.
(p.192)
ancient hermetic concept of the Unis Mundus, one world or one cosmos.
According to Jung (1963b), “The background of our empirical world…
appears to be…a Unis Mundis” (p.538), because there exists a
fundamental “identity of the psychic and the physical” (p.537). Although
it may appear there are two distinct spheres of inner and outer, when one
peers into the depths of the archetypal psyche, these distinctions dissolve
into an undifferentiated unity.
The Numinosum
Numinous experience emanates from and is made possible by the
numinosum, which Jung (1969) defi nes in his essay “Psychology and
Religion” as:
130 Transformative Imagery
form of spirituality that neither defines nor dictates for others what form
the divine should take. Absent an imperative to proselytize or definitively
enshrine a particular image of the ineffable underlying all idiosyncratic
images of the divine, the depth psychological approach to spirituality
instead leads to an open and ecumenical respect for the many ways the
sacred presents itself to individual consciousness.
Endnotes
1. Henry Corbin, a scholar of Islamic mysticism and a contemporary of Jung’s, coined
the term imaginal to differentiate it from the word imaginary, suggesting unreal
or fanciful. The imaginal, in contrast, representsww a separate ontological reality
that mediates sense perceptions and ideas, and requires for its apprehension the
organ human of imagination.
2. Jung first used the term “active imagination,” designating his psychotherapeutic
method at his 1935 “Tavistock Lectures” in London. Information about the
method, which he previously described as “active fantasy,” can be found in the
Collected Works in “The Aims of Psychotherapy,” “The Transcendent Function,”
“On the Nature of the Psyche,” Two Essays on Analytical Psychology, and
Mysterium Coniunctionis.
134 Transformative Imagery
References
Avens, R. (1980) “James Hillman: Toward a poetic psychology.” Journal of Religion and
Health 19, 3, 186–202.
Bair, D. (2003) Jung: A Biography. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.
Buber, M. (1937) I and Thou. Mansfield Centre, CT: Martino Publishing.
Chodorow J. (ed.) (1997) Jung on Active Imagination. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Corbett, L. (1996) The Religious Function of the Psyche. Florence, KY: Taylor and
Francis/Routledge.
Corbett, L. (2007) Psyche and the Sacred: Spirituality Beyond Religion. New Orleans,
LA: Spring Journal Books.
Freud, S. (1974) The Freud Jung Letters: The Correspondence Between Sigmund Freud
and C.G. Jung. Translated by R. Meinheim and R.F.C. Hull. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Hall, E., Hall, C., Stradling, P., and Young, D. (2006) Guided Imagery: Creative
Interventions in Counseling and Psychotherapy, 1st edition. London: SAGE
Publications Ltd.
Hillman, J. (1983) Archetypal Psychology: A Brief Account. Woodstock, CT: Spring
Publications.
Hobson, R.F. (2013) “The Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious.” In M. Fordham,
R. Gordon, and J. Hubback (eds) Analytical Psychology: A Modern Science.
Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Jung, C.G. (1959a) “Aion: Researches into the phenomenology of the self.” In R.F.C.
Hull (trans.) The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, vol. 9, ii. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Jung, C.G. (1959b) “The Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious.” In R.F.C. Hull
(trans.) The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, vol. 9, i. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Jung, C.G. (1960a) “Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche.” In R.F.C. Hull (trans.) The
Collected Works of C.G. Jung, vol. 8. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C.G. (1960b) Carl Jung’s letter to The Listener, January 21, 1960. Temple
Illuminatus. Available at www.templeilluminatus.com/group/carl-jung-s-red-
book/forum/topics/carl-jung-s-letter-to-the-listener-january-21-1960, accessed
on March 12 2012.
Jung, C.G. (1961) “Freud and Psychoanalysis.” In R.F.C. Hull (trans.) The Collected
Works of C.G. Jung, vol. 4. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original
work published in 1931).
Jung, C.G. (1963a) Memories, Dreams, Reflections. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Jung, C.G. (1963b) “Mysterium Coniunctionis.” In R.F.C. Hull (trans.) The Collected
Works of C.G. Jung, vol. 14. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C.G. (1966) “Two Essays on Analytical Psychology.” In R.F.C. Hull (trans.) The
Collected Works of C.G. Jung, vol. 7. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C.G. (1967) “Symbols of transformation.” In R.F.C. Hull (trans.) The Collected
Works of C.G. Jung, vol. 5. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C.G. (1968) “Psychology and Alchemy.” In R.F.C. Hull (trans.) The Collected
Works of C.G. Jung, vol. 12. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
C.G. Jung—Champion of the Imagination 135
Jung, C.G. (1969) “Psychology and Religion: West and East.” In R.F.C. Hull (trans.) The
Collected Works of C.J. Jung, vol. 11. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C.G. (1970) “Civilization in Transition.” In R.F.C. Hull (trans.) The Collected
Works of C.G. Jung, vol. 10. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C.G. (1971) “Psychological Types.” In R.F.C. Hull (trans.) The Collected Works of
C.G. Jung, vol. 6. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jung, C.G. (1973) Letters, vol. 1, 1906–1950. Translated by R.F.C. Hull. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Jung, C.G. (1977) “The Symbolic Life: Miscellaneous writings.” In R.F.C. Hull (trans.)
The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, vol. 18. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press (Original work published 1921).
Jung, C.G. (2009) The Red Book: Liber Novus. Translated by S. Shamdasani (ed.). New
York, NY: W.W. Norton.
Otto, R. (1950) The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-rational Factor in the Idea
of the Divine and its Relation to the Rational. Translated by J.W. Harvey. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Page, R. (2014) “Country Diary: RIP Satao, Kenya’s biggest ‘tusker.’” The Telegraph,
July 22. Available at www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/earthcomment/country-
diary/10980830/Country-Diary-RIP-Satao-Kenyas-biggest-tusker.html,
accessed on April 7 2015.
Pincus, D. and Sheikh, A.A. (2009) Imagery for Pain Relief: A Scientifically Grounded
Guidebook for Clinicians, 1st edition. New York, NY: Routledge.
Singer, J.L. (1974) Imagery and Daydream Methods in Psychotherapy and Behavior
Modification. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Tarnas, R. (2006) Cosmos and Psyche: Intimations of a New World View. New York,
NY: Viking.