Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Daniel J. DeNoon
Authors and Disclosures
Top of Form
Rate This Article: Bottom of Form
Nurse Rating: ( 169 Votes )
• Print This
• Email this
• Share
July 23, 2010 — Sit at leisure, die at haste, an American Cancer Society study finds.
In the 14-year study, people who spent at least 6 hours of their daily leisure time sitting died sooner than
people who sat less than 3 hours.
And people who both sit a lot and exercise little are at even higher risk of death, find ACS epidemiologist
Alpa V. Patel, PhD, and colleagues.
The effect is stronger for women than for men, but significant for both sexes.
Patel's data come from 53,440 U.S. men and 69,776 women who were 50-74 years old when the study
began in 1992.
Study participants were asked, "During the past year, on an average day (not counting time spent at your
job), how many hours a day did you spend sitting (watching television, reading, etc.)?"
After adjusting for smoking, height/weight, and other factors, Patel's team found that compared to sitting
less than three hours a day, sitting six or more hours a day:
Sitting increased risk of cancer death, but the main death risk linked to sitting was heart disease.
"It is beneficial to encourage sedentary individuals to stand up and walk around as well as to reach
optimal levels of physical activity," Patel and colleagues conclude.
The study findings appear in the July 22 early online edition of the American Journal of Epidemiology.
SOURCES:
Patel, A.V. American Journal of Epidemiology, published online July 22, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------
See Also:
• Hearing Loss
• Disability
• Diseases and Conditions
• Workplace Health
• Eye Care
• Diet and Weight Loss
Reference
• Hearing impairment
• Service dog
• Auditory system
• Eardrum
Northwestern Memorial Hospital is one of nine centers in the U.S., and the only in Illinois, that is
participating in a study investigating the effectiveness of a new cochlear implant device that aims to
restore hearing for individuals with high-frequency hearing loss and functional low-frequency hearing.
This group of patients doesn't meet the criteria for conventional cochlear implants because they have
near perfect residual hearing in low pitches that allows them to perform well on tests used to determine
candidacy for traditional implants. However, their hearing in high pitches is so poor that a hearing aid is
not helpful, making them ideally suited for the hybrid implant, which addresses both issues.
"We are hopeful that the hybrid cochlear implant will provide a subset of people who were previously not
candidates for an implantable device the opportunity to test the device to determine if they can experience
sound again," said Northwestern Medicine neurotologist Andrew Fishman, MD, principal investigator of
the study, staff in the departments of otolaryngology and neurosurgery at Northwestern University's
Feinberg School of Medicine, and Mr. Groves' cochlear implant surgeon. "The potential for patients with a
significant amount of residual hearing, but a large amount of high-frequency hearing loss, to have an
alternative to hearing aids would be a great improvement over what is currently available."
Cochlear implants were FDA approved in 1984 as a treatment option for restoring hearing in people with
severe and profound hearing loss. The surgical implant system is designed to stimulate the auditory nerve
by bypassing damaged parts of the ear. A small battery-operated mini "computer" and microphone are
worn on the outside of the ear and convert sounds into electric signals. The signals are then transmitted
to implant electrodes in the cochlea, which stimulate the nerve endings so sound can be perceived by the
brain.
The hybrid cochlear implant works in the same way as traditional cochlear implants, stimulating nerve
endings in the cochlear so that high-pitched sounds can be heard. In addition, it also involves
amplification for low-pitched sounds, similar to a hearing aid. Like traditional cochlear implants, the hybrid
version is worn outside the ear and converts sounds into acoustic and electric signals.
"The surgical implantation of cochlear devices is typically done on an outpatient basis, and usually with
non-serious complications, aside from mild discomfort following surgery," said Northwestern Medicine
otolaryngologist Alan Micco, MD, co-investigator of the study and chief of otology/neurotology at the
Feinberg School of Medicine. "A few weeks following surgery, the activation process and fine-tuning take
place to determine what audio thresholds work best for the individual, and sounds can usually be
perceived shortly thereafter."
Post-activation evaluations take place at three, six and 12 months following the initial activation process
to assess progress of the cochlear implant. An audiologist will also test the implant to determine if
participants are able to understand words, sentences in noisy and quiet environments, as well as
experience music recognition.
A few months post-surgery, Groves is happy to have some of his hearing restored. "I'm very excited and
encouraged by my experience with the implant. I know I'm hearing better than I have for many, many
years, and for that I'm very grateful."
==================================================
===================================
Story Source:
The above story is reprinted (with editorial adaptations by ScienceDaily staff) from materials provided
byNorthwestern Memorial Hospital.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------
EXCLUSIVE: Mila Kunis Wishes Audience Would Take More Away From 'Black Swan' Than Lesbian Sex Scene
1. Memory
Memory plays a crucial role in all cognitive activities, including reading, reasoning and mental
calculation. There are several types of memory at work in the brain. Taken together, these are
the cognitive skills we may notice most when they begin to fail. To maintain a good memory,
you need to train for it, which can be easier than you think. Listening to music is not only
enjoyable, but by choosing a song you don’t know and memorizing the lyrics, you boost the
level of acetylcholine, the chemical that helps build your brain, and improve your memory skills.
Challenge yourself even more by showering or getting dressed in the dark or using your
opposite hand to brush your teeth. These challenges help build new associations between
different neural connections of the brain.
Improve your memory with this HAPPYneuron game.
2. Attention
Attention is necessary in nearly all daily tasks. Good attention enables you to maintain
concentration despite noise and distractions and to focus on several activities at once. We can
improve our attention by simply changing our routines. Change your route to work or reorganize
your desk -- both will force your brain to wake up from habits and pay attention again. As we
age, our attention span can decrease, making us more susceptible to distraction and less
efficient at multitasking. By combining activities like listening to an audio book with jogging or
doing math in your head while you drive forces your brain to work at doing more in the same
amount of time.
Improve your attention with this HAPPYneuron game.
3. Language
Language activities will challenge our ability to recognize, remember and understand words.
They also exercise our fluency, grammatical skills and vocabulary. With regular practice, you
can expand your knowledge of new words and much more easily retrieve words that are
familiar. For example, if you usually only thoroughly read the sports section, try reading a few in-
depth business articles. You’ll be exposed to new words, which are easier to understand when
read in context or easier to look up on a dictionary site if you are reading the news online. Take
time to understand the word in its context, which will help you build your language skills and
retrieve the word more readily in front of your boss in the future.
Improve your language skills with this HAPPYneuron game.
_________________________________________________________________________
More From AskMen.com:
Memory Sandwiches
Memory Foods
The Brain: 5 Things Men Should Know
Working Out at the Brain Gym
Memory Killers
_________________________________________________________________________
4. Visual-Spatial
We live in a colorful, three-dimensional world. Analyzing visual information is necessary to be
able to act within your environment. To work this cognitive function, try walking into a room and
picking out five items and their locations. When you exit the room, try to recall all five items and
where they were located. Too easy? Wait two hours and try to remember those items and their
locations. The next time you’re waiting on your coworker or friend to arrive, try this mental
exercise. Look straight ahead and note everything you can see both in front of you and in your
peripheral vision. Challenge yourself to recall everything and write it down. This will force you to
use your memory and train your brain to focus on your surroundings.
Improve your visual-spatial skills with this HAPPYneuron game.
5. Executive Function
Without even realizing it, you use your logic and reasoning skills on a daily basis to make
decisions, build up hypotheses and consider the possible consequences of your actions.
Activities in which you must define a strategy to reach a desired outcome and calculate the right
moves to reach the solution in the shortest possible time are actually fun activities you do daily
-- like social interaction and, yes, video games. Engaging in a brief visit with a friend boosts your
intellectual performance by requiring you to consider possible responses and desired outcomes.
Video games require strategy and problem-solving to reach a desired outcome -- like making it
to the final level. “It’s not just Halo, honey; I’m exercising my executive brain functions!”
Improve your executive function skills with this HAPPYneuron game.
Cerebral Workout
As we age, it’s important to flex our mental muscles as well as our physiques. Now that you’re
aware of the five main cognitive functions and how to exercise them, it will be easy to find daily
activities that will help you break a mental sweat and keep your brain in shape. If you need a
little structured help, HAPPYneuron has fun and challenging games to work the brain in all five
areas, as well as a virtual coach to serve as a personal trainer and ensure you get the most
optimal brain workout for you.
====================================================================================================
Editor's Choice
Main Category: Fertility
Also Included In: Women's Health / Gynecology; Nutrition / Diet; Sexual Health / STDs
Article Date: 19 Jan 2011 - 0:00 PST
Ads by Google
Healthcare Prof:
Antioxidants are sold over the counter everywhere. They're added to food, drink and face cream. But
according to Prof. Nava Dekel of the Biological Regulation Department, we still don't have a complete
understanding of how they act in our bodies. New research by Dekel and her team, recently published in
theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA(PNAS), has revealed a possible unexpected
side effect of antioxidants: They might cause fertility problems in females.
Common antioxidants include vitamins C and E. These work by eliminating molecules called reactive
oxygen species that are produced naturally in the body. Stress can cause these chemically active
molecules to be overproduced; in large amounts they damage cells indiscriminately. By neutralizing these
potentially harmful substances, antioxidants may, theoretically, improve health and slow down the aging
process.
But when Dekel and her research team including her former and present Ph.D. students Dr. Ketty
Shkolnik and Ari Tadmor applied antioxidants to the ovaries of female mice, the results were surprising:
ovulation levels dropped precipitously. That is, very few eggs were released from the ovarian follicles to
reach the site of fertilization, compared to those in untreated ovaries.
To understand what lies behind these initial findings, the team asked whether it is possible that the
process of ovulation might rely on the very 'harmful' substances destroyed by antioxidants - reactive
oxygen species.
Further testing in mice showed that this is, indeed, the case. In one experiment, for instance, Dekel and
her team treated some ovarian follicles with luteinizing hormone, the physiological trigger for ovulation,
and others with hydrogen peroxide, a reactive oxygen species. The results showed hydrogen peroxide
fully mimicked the effect of the ovulation-inducing hormone. This implies that reactive oxygen species that
are produced in response to luteinizing hormone serve, in turn, as mediators for this physiological
stimulus leading to ovulation.
Among other things, these results help fill in a picture that has begun to emerge in recent years of fertility
and conception, in which it appears that these processes share a number of common mechanisms with
inflammation. It makes sense, says Dekel, that substances which prevent inflammation in other parts of
the body might also get in the way of normal ovulation, and so more caution should be taken when
administering such substances.
Much of Dekel's research has focused on fertility -- her previous results are already helping some women
become pregnant. Ironically, the new study has implications for those seeking the opposite effect. Dekel:
'On the one hand, these findings could prove useful to women who are having trouble getting pregnant.
On the other, further studies might show that certain antioxidants might be effective means of birth
controlthat could be safer than today's hormone-based prevention.'
Dekel and her team are now planning further studies to investigate the exact mechanics of this step in
ovulation and to examine its effect on mice when administered in either food or drink. In addition, they
plan to collect data on the possible link between females being administered antioxidant supplements and
the difficulty to conceive.
Prof. Nava Dekel's research is supported by the M.D. Moross Institute for Cancer Research; the Jeanne
and Joseph Nissim Foundation for Life Sciences Research; the Yeda-Sela Center for Basic Research; the
Willner Family Center for Vascular Biology - Head; the Dwek Family Biomedical Research Fund; the
Phyllis and Joseph Gurwin Fund for Scientific Advancement; and the J & R Foundation. Prof. Dekel is the
incumbent of the Philip M. Klutznick Professorial Chair of Developmental Biology.
Top of Form
====================================================================================================
• Print This
• Email this
• Share
January 12, 2011 — The common practice of tablet splitting is a highly inaccurate and potentially
dangerous practice, resulting in large dose deviations, according to the results of a study reported in the
January issue of the Journal of Advanced Nursing.
"Tablet-splitting is widespread in all healthcare sectors and a primary care study in Germany found that
just under a quarter of all drugs were split," lead study author Charlotte Verrue, PharmD, PhD, from the
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences at Ghent University in Belgium, said in a news release. "It is done for
a number of reasons: to increase dose flexibility, to make tablets easier to swallow and to save money for
both patients and healthcare providers. However, the split tablets are often unequal sizes and a
substantial amount of the tablet can be lost during splitting."
The study goal was to quantify the mean deviation from the theoretical weight and the mean weight loss
resulting from tablet-splitting using 3 different splitting methods in widespread use in nursing homes: the
Pilomat splitting device, scissors for unscored tablets or manual splitting for scored tablets, and a kitchen
knife. In 2007, 5 volunteers (an administrative coworker, a laboratory technician, a pharmacy student, and
2 pharmacists) were asked to use these methods to split 8 tablets varying in size and shape. An analytical
balance was used to weigh tablets and tablet parts before and after splitting.
Nearly a third (31%) of the split fragments deviated from recommended dosages by 15% or more, and
14% deviated by more than 25%.
For all tablets tested, the Pilomat splitting device resulted in a statistically significantly lower mean
deviation from theoretical weight compared with the other 2 methods, which did not significantly differ
from each other. This device also resulted in significantly less weight loss than the other 2 methods when
the different tablets were pooled.
"Large dose deviations or weight losses can occur while splitting tablets," the study authors write. "This
could have serious clinical consequences for medications with a narrow therapeutic-toxic range."
Limitations of this study include failure to compare 3 distinct methods, as the second method consisted of
splitting by hand whenever the tablet had a score line or with scissors when the tablet was unscored. In
addition, no nurses were included in the volunteer group, and the clinical effect of the weight deviations
was not investigated.
"On the basis of our results, we recommend use of a splitting device when splitting cannot be avoided
(i.e. for example when the prescribed dose is not commercially available, or when there is no alternative
formulation, such as a liquid)," the study authors conclude. "Nursing home staff performing the splitting
should also be educated in splitting as accurately as possible, and should be aware of the possible
clinical consequences of dose deviations. As for policy implications, we recommend that manufacturers
make it possible to avoid splitting, by introducing a wider range of tablet doses or liquid formulations."
This study "received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit
sectors." The study authors have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
========================================================Bottom of Form