Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
David S c o r z a
I NTRODUCTORY REMARKS
Au is an unusual Papuan language spoken by some 4 , 100 inhabitants l iving
in the East-West Wape i Counci l area east of Lumi , the subprovince headquarters
of the west Sepik Province in Northern Papua New Guinea .
The data u sed in this paper are the result of research in Au carried out
by the author and his wife from 1968 to 1977 . Fieldwork has been done primari ly
in the Central d ialect in the village of Tumentonik . Other d ialects include the
Eastern d ialect and the Southern d ialect which are a l l mutual ly intell igible .
All research has been conducted under the auspices of the Summer Institute of
Lingu istic s .
Much o f the data was extracted from the morpheme by morpheme concordance
of Au consi sting of 4 3 , 3 3 2 words of text made on the IBM 1410 Computer at the
University of Oklahoma by the Lingu i stic Information Retrieval Pro j ect and
partially funded by National Sc ience Foundation Grant GS-93 4 .
I gratefu l l y acknowledge the assistance of several men from Tumentonik
and a number of l ingu i sts from the Summer Institute of Linguistics in papua New
Guine a , without whom the analysis upon which thi s paper is based could not have
been done .
I am particu larl y grateful to Karl Franklin who has generously given of
his t ime and expertise in d irecting the writing of thi s paper through all of
its stages . And I wish to express my appreciation to Stephen Wal l ace , Marvin
Mayers and Kenneth McElhanon for their helpful suggestions in the rev i s ion
and editing of the manuscript . 1
O. GENERAL I NTRODUCT I ON
The Au language is spoken by 4 , 100 people l iv ing in the East-West Wapei
Counc i l area east of Lumi , the subprovince headquarters of the Sandaun Province
in Papua New Guinea . There are three dialects : the Eastern spoken by 2 , 3 00
people l iv ing in eight v i l lages , the Western spoken by 600 people l iving in
three v i l lages , and the Central , upon which this analys i s i s based , spoken by
1 , 200 people l iv ing in e ight v i l lages .
Scorza, D. "A sketch of Au morphology and syntax". In Adams, K., Lauck, L., Miedema, J., Welling, F., Stokhof, W., Flassy, D., Oguri, H., Collier, K., Gregerson, K., Phinnemore, T., Scorza, D., Davies, J., Comrie, B. and Abbott, S. editors, Papers in New Guinea Linguistics No. 22.
A-63:215-273. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1985. DOI:10.15144/PL-A63.215
©1985 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative.
216 DAVID SCORZA
0.1 . T heory
The analysis presented in the following sections describes in detail the
word classe s , phrases and clauses , or an overview of the basic gramma tical
structure of AU , us ing a format adapted from the tagmemic model of P ike ( 1967 ) .
The analysis presented here u ses a simple prose description for word
classes and phrases unless there are several c lasses of fil lers for the phrases .
I n such cases and for clau ses , a bi-dimensional array of the internal structure
of the construction which is under consideration is also given , followed by the
normal prose elaboration of the array . In every case , examples of the external
d istribution of the constructions are given .
Contrastive
Phrase Clause Sen Para Discourse
features
Kinds of
X X X X X
constituents
Number of
obl igatory X X X X X
constituents
Number of
optional X X X X X
constituents
0. 3 . Presen ta t i on
In our outline and presentation of Au grammar in this paper , an inventory
of Au phonemes is given first , fol lowed by comments on stress (which is predic
table ) , and conc luded with the few basic morphophonemic rules that occur .
Section 1 treats verb c lasses f ir st from the perspective of derivation ;
fol lowing that , the verb classes are considered in relation to their inflection .
Section 2 treats non-verbal word c lasses in a manner parallel to section 1 ,
looking both at derivation and inflection .
Section 3 outl ines the basic phrase types and shows the extensive agreement
of numeral s , personal pronouns and all noun-ad juncts to the nuclear or pr imary
constituent ( or head ) of the constructions under consideration .
Section 4 focuses on the Au clauses . C lauses are described by d iv iding
them into independent and dependent c lauses and descr ibing them from the per
spectives of transitivity and mode . Sub j ect cross-reference is also d i scus sed
with examples used to reflect its operation between constituents , particularly
reference back to the subj ect .
Section 5 i s a summary o f the syntactic and morphological features which
have been described in the earlier sections with an explanation of their sig
nificance in the overal l function of Au grammar .
Section 6 ou tlines features descr ibed up to this point in the grammar , as
wel l as add itional features not d iscussed ear lier by comparing them to other
Papuan languages . The results of this comparative study show that Au has many
aberrant features which give a solid basis for Laycock ( 1 97 5 : 768) to rate the
Torrice l l i Phylum as a linguistic group separate from other Papuan languages .
A SKETCH OF AU MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX 219
0. 3. 1 . Segmental phonemes
There are 17 phonemes which represent the phonological system for Au ;
there are eight consonants , two semivowel s and seven vowel s . These are
indicated below :
Consonants : stops Ipl I tI I kl
fricatives lsi Igl (voiced velar fricative)
nasals Iml Inl
f lap I rl
Semivowels : Iwl Iyl
Vowels : high front c lose unrounded /il
high central close unrounded IfI
high back close rounded lui
mid central close unrounded ! AI symbo l ised lei
mid back c lose rounded 101
low central close unrounded lal
low central c lose unrounded laal ( lengthened vowe l )
The lengthened vowel symbolised as laal has two distinct manifestations .
I n the central dialec t , the lengthened vowel i s interrupted by a glottal stop .
la?a/ , but in the phonological analysis has been considered as a single
syllabic unit . This phenomenon does not occur in the Eastern d ialect .
0.3.2. Stre s s
stress normal ly occurs o n the f irst syllable of a word , which may have up
to four syl lables . Some exceptions are noted below :
( a ) The vowel I f I is never stressed unless the only vowel s in the word are lei
or another If I . Examples are :
(1) mt t f k man (4) k- h f r he-flees
(2) mt t e woman (5) k - f s �wfn he-hides
(3) h 4 ne knife (6) k- � t f p he-talks
( b ) The vowel lei i s never stressed unless the only other vowels are If I or
another lei . Examples are :
(7) nep e re dog (9) k-ew� t he-gives
(8) perpere flying fox ( 10 ) k-ek f n t f p he-steals
0.3.3. Morphophonem i c s
Stem reductions and vowel alternations are the two most important types of
changes occurring in Au when affixation occurs on verb stems .
issomeoneofInflectional
ofthetheverbsprimaryaffixation,
bases for asdistinguishing
mentioned in theclasses
have maysubjectoptionally
or objectinfixmarkers
introduction
of verbs.
as partmarkers
of this
Even
of theirpreceding
section,
though
construction,
there
final are others
syllable of which
the word. There are the object
co-occurrence restrictions which t.he
occur
with some of these classes, which will be handled as each type is described.
with aItvowel is interesting
while all theto notenounsthatbeginin either
their uninflected state, oralla verbs
with a semivowel begin
consonant.
1 .3. 1 . Infl ecti onal affi xat i on
will Beforenecessary
be any oftotheshowclasses
the of verbals
order in which canthebe adequately
affixes described,
occur in it first
relation to
the verb stem. There are three types of affixes: prefixes, infixes and suffixes.
(a) Prefixes
Prefixessystemarewhich
subjectoccursmarkersin Au.whichTheseinflectprefixes
in accordance with theofcross
clause, as well as optionally marking tense/aspect. See Chart B. a
reference mark the subject
Singular Dual Plural
1st person h- w- m-
2nd person h- y- y-
3rd person
masc k- t-
n-
fern w- n-
neut k- m- m-
(b) byInfixes
orally marking function
the in within
object two ways,theeither
verb by marking
stem. themarker
Aspect verb foroccurs
tense/aspect,
option p
following the first vowel of the verb. Examples are:
(41) k-a t f - p he talks k-e- ( p ) - t f p he keeps on
he-ta lks he-ta lks- ( cont) -ta lks ta lking
(42) k-au he sits k-e-p-u h e keeps on
he sits he-sits- ( cont) -sits sitting
224 DAVID SCORZA
Infixed obj ect markers optional ly occur preceding the last syllable of the verb .
Only certain transitive verbs take these markers in this position ( see section
1 . 3 . 2 . - (d » . They only occur when the obj ect of the verb in a clause level
construction is a bound form .
(c) Su ffixes
There are four types of suffixes : (1) resultative ( f irst order ) , ( 2 )
benefactive ( second order ) , ( 3 ) obj ective ( third order ) , and ( 4 ) reciprocal
act ion . The reciprocal action suffix generally appear s alone , and is mutually
exc lu sive with benefactive and obj ective , but occurs occasionally fol lowing
resultative .
Resu ltative suffix is formed by duplicating the final consonant of the
verb and adding a vowel to maintain a pattern of vowel harmony . I f the final
syl lable contains a high vowe l , the reduplicated vowel wil l be If I , but if it
i s a low or mid vowel , the reduplicated vowel will be an leI . Resultative
suff ix refines the basic semantic content of the verb . Examples are shown
below .
(43) k-erek i r he cuts i t ; k-e rek i r- f r he cuts in into
he-cuts-i t he-auts-it-re pieces
(44) k-en i uwes he laughs ; k-en i uwe s - +s he laughs and
he- laughs he- laughs-pI laughs
Benefactive suffix occurs affixes only to ditransitive verbs . Examples
of these forms can be seen in 1 . 3 . 3 . Chart C below indicates their formation .
3rd person
masc - uwek - uwek H
-or I - f r
fern - uwe -or I - f r
Obj ective suffixes fol low benefactive suffixes when they co-occur affixed
to ditransitive verbs . Examples of these forms can be seen in 1 . 3 . 3 . Suffixes
manifesting 3rd person s ingular and dual have several manifestations which are
phonologically determined . See Chart D .
A SKETCH OF AU MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX 225
3rd person
masc -ek/- i k/ - f k/ - t/- s/
e e
-aak - i kH/-aakH
-i
fern -ep/ - i p/
- i e/ - a a
-i
neut - e k/ - i k/
- f k/ - a a k
-em -em
Reciprocal
transitive and action suffixverbsoccurswhenas ittheoccurs.
ditransitive final syllable
The in intransitive,
allomorphic variations
areoccurphonologically
contiguous withdetermined;
vowels of the
the base
verb form
( w is
hich violates The suffix
I-ani .
vowel harmony mayand not
-an
would
isandplacedcause the ruletheofverbfinalandvowelwhendeletion
between -anthe to beofactivated)
vowel the verb . isTherefore,
averb.
back vowel, w
( b ) Subclass two transitive verbs may only take free noun obj ects . Examples
are :
( 50 ) k-hak t u k-r n he beats the s Ut gong drwn
he-beats s Ut gong
(51) k-enep sak he shot the pig
he-shot pig
( d ) Subc lass four transitive verbs have an obj ect occurring as part of the
verb stem . These obj ects occur only in the third person and may be singular ,
dual or plural . These are indicated in Chart E .
3rd person
masc -k- -t-
-n-
fern -h- -n-
( e ) Subclass five transitive verbs optionally take infixed obj ect pronouns in
place of free pronouns . These verbs take the benefactive obj ect pronouns as an
infix whi le at the same t ime taking d irect obj ect pronouns as a suffix . Examples
are :
( 56) k- i t - uwe k- h i -em he asks him about them
he-asks-him-asks-of them
( 57 ) k-em i t - uwek- p -r n he Ues to him
he- Lies- to him- Lies
( g ) Subclass seven transitive verbs are irregu lar . The stem changes for each
person because the obj ect pronoun is wholly integrated into the verb and as
such is indistinguishable from i t . See Chart F for examples .
2nd person k- i t e p k - i ye p k - i ye p
he-hi t-you he-hit-you ( two) he-hit-you (pl )
3 rd person
masc k-akfp k-aksfp k-anfp
he-hit-him he-hit- them (two) he-hit- them ( p l )
(b) Subclass two intransitive verbs are irregular in that the stem changes
when co-occurring with future tense/aspect aff ixation . Examples are :
(64) k-en he goes ; k - a k - no he wi l l go
he-goes he�wi l l-go
bas ic stem : -en altered stem : - a no
(65) k-an he comes ; k - a k-nen he wi l l come
he-comes he�wi l l-come
basic stem : - a n altered stem : -anen
2.2. Deri v a t i on
Non-verbal words can be formed in Au through compounding . This involves
grouping word s such as non-adj ective , noun-noun , and the redupl ication of words
and stems .
A SKETCH OF AU MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX 229
(b) Adverbs
( 68 ) ma i n -ma i n s lowly; quietly
( 69 ) wa s -wa s quickly
(c) Nouns
(70) kukt r-kukfr noise (of foots teps)
(71) tap i n - tapfn gooseflesh bumps
(72) ke r - ke r noise (of pounding)
(73) hfn-hfn arrow design
(d) Verbs
(74) h a n - ha n desire; love
(75) ehfn-hfn t o b e startled
(76) e pe r - pe r shake with fear
(77) etar i -tari to be i nsensib le; crazy; drunk
The morphophonemic rule of vowel deletion occurs in the formation of verbs
( 7 5 ) - ( 7 7 ) ; thi s rule is di scussed in section 0 . 3 . 3 .
Other word c lasses which may b e inflected include adj ectives , nouns
( including numeral and locationa l ) and interrogatives . Inflection wi l l be
d i scussed in relation to how each of the above c lasses manifest it .
2.3. 1 . N ou n s
Numerals and locational nouns may inflect for person , personal nouns
inflect only for number . These are the only classes of nouns that inflect .
Their description follows .
( a ) General personal nouns change their basic form to show number and appear
in most noun phrases . The few forms which occur manifest no consistent pattern
of inflectional end ings . Examples are :
(93) mft men (plura l )
men
( 94 ) mf t f k man
man
( 95 ) m f t f kf t men
men
( 96 ) mfte woman
woman
(97) m i ye p f r women (dual and plural )
women
(b) Kinship personal nouns have the same co-occurrence restr ictions as the
general personal nouns . These kinship nouns are obl igatorily possessed . They
a l so inflect to show number as i l lustrated in ( 9 9 ) and ( 10 1 ) . In this c lass
rer (plura l ) is the only form suffixed to show plural ity . Examples are :
( 98 ) maam k-a i my grandfather
grandparent he-mine
( 99 ) maam- r e r n -a i u our ancestors
ancestor-pl they ours
( 100) haa i k - f ra k his father
father he-his
( 10 1 ) haa i - r e r n -a i u our fathers, our leaders
father-pl they-ours
( d ) Numeral s inflec t for gender and number , but the person expressed is always
third person . Only the primary numerals one and two inflect . Examples are as
follows :
( 106) k- i u t fp one
he/it-one
( 107 ) p- i u t t p one
she-one
( 108 ) w i ke t e r -e s two
two-dl . male
( 109) w i k e t e r -em two
two-dl . neut
( 110) w i ke t e r - i two
two-dl . fem
2nd person ti yi yi
3rd person
masc h f ra k h f ra kt t
hf r
fern h f re hfr
2nd person h f r a - ke s h f ra - s h f ra - s
3rd person
masc h f ra - ke s hf ra-kses
h f ra - s
fern h f r a - he s h f ra - s
(c) Subc lass three demonstrative pronouns function as qua l ifier constituents
in the general noun phrases ( i . e . these things , those things , etc . ) . Chart I
indicates the bas ic forms .
thi s ik it im
( d ) Subclass four pronouns are posses sive which funtion as posse ssive constit
uents in general noun phrases .
Of a l l word c lasses which are non-verbal , the possess ive pronouns are the
most complex and occur more often than nouns in phrase constructions . The
initial consonant marks the gender and the number of the item possessed , and
the remainder of the word marks the person , gender and number of the possessor .
Chart J i l lu strates thi s by means of two parameter s : the horizontal parameter
ind icates the item possessed , whi l e the vertical parameter indicates the pos
sessor . This c lass set as a whole i l lu strates the concord between constituents
more clearly than any other class of inflecting word s .
A SKETCH OF AU MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX 235
2nd sing k- i t p- i t t- i t n- i t m- i t
fern k - f re p- f re t - f re n - f re m-f re
3rd dual
masc k- f ra k f t p- f ra k f t t - f rakft n - f ra k f t m- f ra k f t
3rd pI
masc/fern k- f r p-fr t-fr n-fr m- f r
In thi s section we wil l outline the various types of phrase level construc
tions which are manifested by the verbal and non-verbal word classes . The
phrase level is not compl icated enough , for the most part , to warrant a bi
dimensional chart (Longacre 197 2 ) and therefore , a simple prose descr iption wi l l
normally b e used to describe phrases , immediately fol lowed b y examples . When
mU ltiple f i llers exist for any of the constituents , some confusion may ar ise
for the more complex constructions , and therefore , a bi-dimensional chart wil l
precede the prose description . I n such charts names o f the constituents , as
we l l as their optional or obl igatory status , are indicated along the horizontal
parameter . The names of the c lass fil lers which we have observed in the data
are l i sted along the vertical parameter . An example of a bi-dimensional chart
appears below .
Constituents + A + B + C
y Z
Classer s of
X
fillers
Co-ordinate noun phrases manifest the Sub j ect and Obj ect on the c lause level
and the Head of general noun phrases .
of f i llers which manifest each constituent will be helpful . The general noun
phrase manifests the Subject and Obj ect in clause level constructions and on
the phrase level it embed s with the Relator-axis and Qualified pronoun phrases .
In the general noun phrase ( see Chart L below for the order ing of constit
uents in the phrase ) , only the Head is obl igatory , and may be considered the
minimal position within a manifestation of the general noun phrase . There are
six other functions with c lasses which co-occur with the Head , but these occur
optionally with certain co-occurrence restrictions among them . Genera l ly , no
more than two other entities may co-occur with the Head constituent , but some
instances have been found with three .
Examples with spec ific embedding wil l be indicated following the free
translation in the right hand margin . These examples wil l be presented below
following Chart L .
+
-
Spec ifier + Head + + Posses sive
-
:!:. Description
Cant • . •
There are three possible functions in the phrase , and only the Head is obl ig
atory. As can be seen in Chart M above , the Head may be fil led by any verb
from any clas s . The Aspect is manifested by ap ' not ' , wen ' yet ' , n epe i ' com
pletive ' , p f ke ' repetitive ' , amf ' intentive ' , and a re ' desiderative ' . The
Accompl ishment may be separated from the Predicate when Obj ect and non-diagnostic
constituents occur fol lowing the Predicate ; it then must occur as the last item
in the clau se . Examples of general verb phrase are :
( 18 0 ) t i ap ano W i tne do not go to Witne
you not you-wi l l-go Wi tne
( 18 1 ) h f ra k nepe i k-en Yenkok he a lready went to Yenkok
he completive he-went Yenkok
(182) n -e s i p - a a k n e pe i a u they already carved i t
they-carve-it completive
( 183 ) h f ra k k-e i yfm k-en wen au
he he-got-them he-went non-completive
he has not yet gotten them and taken them away
( 184) h i amf akfp I intend t o h i t him
I intentive I-wi l l-hit him
( 18 5 ) h f r a k k - a re k - a k - no Lum i he wants to go to Lumi
he he-desir . he-wi l l-go Lumi
4. C LAUSES
4.1 . I n trodu c t i on
In the preceding section we descr ibed word c lasses , their formation and
how these classes fit into various phrase level constructions . I n this section
we demonstrate how the d ifferent phrase types manifest various clause level
constituents as they function in the c lauses .
An Au c lause has been def ined as a construction in the gramma tical
hierarchy which occurs between the phrase l evel and the sentence level . The
construction consists of or includes one Predicate or pred icate-l ike constit
uent , and various peripheral constituents . The clause construction in turn
u sually manifests sentence level constituents .
A SKETCH OF AU MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX 245
The c lause requ ires only one Predicate constituent which may be manifested
by a word level construction which i s fully inflected to show a cross reference
with the other c lause constituents . As was shown in section 1 , a Predicate
constituent may be manifested by two verb word s compounded , but these do not
indicate two Predicate constituents in the clause . Although both verbs inflect ,
only one lexical item (derived form) results . The Predicate may also be
manifested by any single verb word .
Although embedding of c lauses into other clause level constructions is not
extensive , it does occur . In cases of embedd ing , the pred icate constituent of
the embedded c lause is not inc luded among the constituents of the c lause con
struction under consideration .
In addition to the Predicate constituent which i s obl igatory in c lause
constructions , other optional constituents include Sub j ect , Obj ect , Location ,
Time , Manner and Instrument/Accompaniment . These optional constituents are
d iagnostic because they show contrast in c lause types and are distinguishing
features of various clau ses .
C lau ses are classified into two major types : Independent clauses and
Dependent clau ses . These contrast in the constituents manifesting clau se level
constructions and in their d istribution in sentence level constituents .
The Equative clause has an obl i gatory Comment constituent functionally
equivalent to the Predicate constituent although i t is manifested by non-verbal
word c lasses . See 4 . 2 . 1 . - ( e ) for a di scussion on the Equational Predicate .
4 . 2. 1 . Trans i ti v i ty parameter
Across the transitivity parameter the f ive clau se types contrast in the
manifesting c lass of the predicate constituent and in the optional diagnostic
constituents which manifest each c lause type . These are now described on the
following page .
< - - - - -- -------------- - Transitivity parameter --------------------- >
( IT) ( ID ) (II) ( 15 ) ( IE )
Declarative + 5 + P + 0
- -
+ 5 + P + 10 + 0
- - -
+ 5 + P + 5 + P + 0 + Tp + Cm
Interrogative + Ig + 5 + P + 0
- -
+ Ig ±. 5 + P + Ig + 5 + P
-
+ Ig + 5 + P + 0 + Ig + Tp + Cm
information* + 10 + 0
- -
Imperative + 5 + P + 0
- -
+ 5 + P + IO + 0
- - -
+ 5 + P
-
+ Sub j ect
-
+ Predicate i:. Obj ect + Instrument
- -
+ Location
The Predicate i s the only obl igatory item and is manifested by a transitive
verb or verb phrase . Optional constituents include the items d i splayed in the
above bi-dimensional array . A Subj ect , whose constituent may be animate or
inanimate , occurs as an independent form when present , but Obj ect , which occurs
following the Pred icate , may occur as an independent from ( noun) or may appear
affixed to the Predicate , as a pronoun . Examples are :
( 18 6 ) h - enep- i k (p , 0)
I-made- i t
I p u t i t together
( 187 ) hfr n-fnap n - e r i uwe - r e k (5, P , I)
they they-shouted they-with- i t
(as they brought i t ) they shouted with i t
( 188) h f r n - ew i s - fm m-au si ( 5 , P , 0 , L)
they they-put-them they-on fire
they p Zaced them on the fire
( 18 9 ) h f r n - i me wf non m-e p f n a k m-e pfnak ( 5 , P , 0 , L)
they they-make tips they-of s ide they-of side
they carved tips on either end
The capital letters which appear in parentheses represent the constituents
which manifest clause level construct ions : 5 = Sub j ect , P Predicate , and so on .
=
+ Sub j ect
-
+ Predicate -
+ Benefactive i:. Obj ect + Instrument
-
+ Subj ect
-
+ Predicate + Location
-
The Predicate and Obj ect are obligatory , but the free pronoun Subj ect is
optional . The Predicate is manifested by a stative verb , which i s a compound
word . The Obj ec t may be manifested by a free form such as a noun or a general
noun phrase , or it may appear affixed to the verb . The few examples from the
data are :
( 202) si t -a a - k wtnak ( p , 0)
fire they-ate-it house
the house burned down (fire ate the house)
(203) h f ra k s i t -a a - k his ( S , P , 0)
he fire they-ate-it hand
he burned his hand (fire ate the hand)
( 2 04 ) si t - a - ( t ) - t kn en - i ( p , 0)
fire they-burn- (wi l l ) -burn-you
the fire wi l l burn you
The Predicate is manifested in the previous examples by a verb that fol lows
no normal inflection rules and never appears in any other form . Although , on
the one hand , it appears to fit into the class of noun-verb compound s ( 2 . 2 . 1 .
noun-verb compound s ) , its particular formation allows u s to place it in a
unique class .
+ Topic + Comment
( 221) epau in e
you-stay here
you remain here
(222) amnep mtte i p e
we-must-ki l l woman this
let us ki l l this woman
(223) awaa i ein
you-must-go there
( later on3 you go to the river) and you mus t s leep there
I-<
...
Q) +0 +0
> Simultaneous +S
- +P -
+0 +S
- +P -
+10 - +S
- +P +S
- +P -
I
I
I ( SM) DTrSm DDTrSm D1TrSm DSSm
I
I
I +0
I purpose +Ps -
+S +P -
+0 +Ps -
+S +P -
+10 - +Ps -
+S +P
I
I
V (Ps) DTrP DDTrP D1TrP
Chart 0 : Dependent c l a u s es
N
(Jl
w
2 54 DAVID SCORZA
The ordering given in Chart Q is the most frequent ordering of the con
stituents . However , there are times when peripheral constituents may shift
their order , such as when prominence is given to a particular constituent in
the construction . The Time constituent may be shifted from its initial position
in the c lause to a position fol lowing the sub j ect in order that the subj ect
might be made prominent . The Obj ect may appear in initial position for the
same reason . When the Obj ect is shifted , a bound obj ect affixed to the verb
manifesting the Predicate must also be present . In an I nterrogative clau se ,
the Subj ect may appear twic e : once initially and the second time in its normal
position preceding the Predicate constituent . No other shift of constituents
has appeared in the data .
No peripheral constituents have been observed in Equative clause . Some
examples are :
( 23 8 ) h i ra k nepup k-an wi tei k ( Subject fronted)
HE yes terday he-came v i l lage
he came to the v i l lage yesterday
( 23 9 ) m i t e h i r a k mi t i k k -e t p - uwe k-a re (Ob j ect fronted )
woman he man he-said- to her he-this
this WOMAN, the man said to her . . .
( 24 0 ) t i h - enma k t e t i h-an ( Subject fronted in
you you-may then you you-came interrogative )
then why have YOU come ?
Transtiive clause -
+ T + S
-
+ P + a
-
+ M
-
+ I
-
+ L
-
Ditransitive clause -
+ T + S
-
+ P + 10 + a
- -
+ M
-
+ I
-
+ L
-
Intransitive clause -
+ T + S
-
+ P + A
-
+ M
-
+ L
-
Stative clau se -
+ T + S
-
+ P + a + I
-
+ L
-
Equative clause + Tp + cm
Along the horizontal parameter , the Declarative c lause fol lows the same
ordering given for the transitivity parameter as shown ear l ier . The I nter
rogative clause has an obligatory constituent which may occur in place of any
one constituent when the focus is on that constituent ( i . e . Subj ect , Obj ect ,
Location , etc . ) ; this does not include Predicate or Topic . For example , the
Interrogative may replace the noun constituent functioning as Instrument and
then appear where the Instrument would normal ly appear in the clause .
In a normal tex t , only one of two peripheral constituents , in add ition to
d iagnostic ones , occurs in a c lause .
4. 5. Negation
The negative formu la for Independent and Dependent clauses is as fol lows :
when a clause occurs med ially in the sentence , the Aspect , manifested by a p
not , occurs with the Predicate and negates the clause . Whan a c lause occurs
A SKETCH OF AU MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX 257
4.6. Embeddi ng
In Au , embedding is very common and usually involves the clau se and phrase
leve l s . There are two types of embedding : clause embedded in clause (commonly
called recursion - Longacre 1 97 2 ) and c lause embedded within a phrase level
construction (backlooping ) .
4.6. 1 . Recurs i on
Recursion i s generally l imited to sensory verbs which include cognition
and perception , and these usua l ly have a verbal complement fol lowing which
explains what was recognised or perceived . The embedded clause may only occur
with a minimum of constituents (with free pronoun subject omitted ) or it may
include two peripheral constituents . Examples of recursion are :
( 24 4 ) h i hanhan a h f t menmen m- f r a k
I desire I-wi l l-get something they-his
I desire to obtain his possessions
(245) h i h - en a i n h -en kewfn m 1" n l U
I I-fear I-fa l l down-an mountain
I am afraid that I wi l l fa l l down the mountain
( 24 6 ) hf rak k - f r s a k k - f r a k k- f r f r
he he-saw pig it-his it-fled
he saw that his pig was running away
4.6.2. Bac k1 00 p i ng
Backlooping occurs quite frequently in narrative text material . In
backlooping , clauses embed themselves in phrase level constituents , u sually in
apposition to a noun manifesting the c lause level constituents of Subj ect ,
Ob j ect , Instrument or Location . Examples are :
( 24 7 ) h f ra k k-en k-f r t uwaa n pe rpe r e m-aa - k ( ob j ect)
he he-went he-saw breadfruit flying fox they -ate-it
he went and looked at the breadfruit tree that the flying foxes
had been eating from (ob j ect)
258 DAVID SCORZA
4.7. E l l i ps i s
Another common feature in Au i s e l l ipsis , where much o f a redundant clause
appears e lided for the sake of brevity or convenience . This is frequent in
everyday speech, but appear s less in text mater ial . The two most common types
that occur in text are either an e l l ipsis of appostion or one of alternative .
A more rare type , total el l ipsis of a ful l sentence , may occur fol lowing a
sentence which is to be negated . Thi s can be seen in the f inal example below .
Examples are :
( 251) n u n u k-e w i ( apposition)
wood wood it�of pathway
they make a trap of wood . . . wood for a pathway
( 252) h i h-erek i r h i s h i s yaa i m !!!.-� ( apposition )
I I-cut-it hand hand right they-my
I cut my hand . . . my right hand
( 2 53 ) h f re w- i ne n f kan 0 n f k i ? ( alternative)
she she-bore son or daughter
did she bear a son or (did she bear) a daughter?
( 2 54) h f re w-en w-e i t w i k 0 w i kak? ( a lternative)
she she-went she-got two or three
did she go and get two or (did she get) thre e ?
( 255) hfr n f rak-em ha i u m-am-no m-et fwem ; �, au ( negation)
they they-do-them we we-wi l l-go we-get-them no no
if they do these things then we go and arrest them; (if they)
don ' t, (then we ) don ' t
5. SUMMARY
5. 1 . I ntroductory rema rks
In the previous f ive sections we have outl ined the basic features of Au
morphology and syntax . The approach has been taxonomic (based on a tagmemic
mod e l ) with items which function on lower l evels manifesting constituents of
higher levels .
In thi s section we summarise the most important features of Au grammar .
A SKETCH OF AU MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX 259
r r
( 25 6 ) m1- t t k enu-k e v i l man
man bad-he
r I
( 257) m 1- t e e n u -0 evi l woman
woman bad-she
r--1
( 2 58 ) n t ka n k- i u t t p one son
son he-one
I r
( 259) ntki p- i u t t p one daughter
daughter she-one
I I
( 2 60) mt t t k ha - k k-ere-k-e-k only a man
man s-he only-he- tlUit-he
I I
( 261) m 1- t e h a -£ kere - p- e - p only a woman
woman s - she only-she-that-she
Subj ect , Predicate and other constituents of c lause l evel constructions
a lso show agreement (or concord ) . S ince Au has no inflectional endings to
show case relationships , it depends heavily upon word order and subject refer
ence to show subj ect-obj ect relationships . In intransitive c lauses , the
Predicate inflects to show concord with the Subject ; when Location is present ,
it inflects as wel l to show concord with the Subj ect . An exampl e is :
260 DAVID SCORZA
, ,
( 262) h f r a k k-en kewfn k-e i t w i t e i k
he he-fe l l down he-at v i l lage
he fe l l down at the vil lage
In a transi tive clause , when Instrument occur s , it inflects in a similar manner
as does Location , reinforcing the identity of the Subject . An example is :
, ,
( 2 63 ) h f r a k k-enep s a k k-e r i uwe henm i k
he he-shot pig he-with bamboo arrow
he shot a pig with a bamboo arrow
As has been i l lu strated with the above examples , the agreement system
includes various c lasses of word s both verbal and non-verbal and assists in
the tracking of partic ipant referenc e .
5.2.2. Verb c l a s s i fi ca t i on
The di stinguishing character istic which sets transitive verbs apart from
other verbs is the occurrence of inf ixed subject or obj ect markers in the verb
stem . Thi s feature is apparently unique to the Torr icell i Phylum . There are
two types of such verbs : in the first type , the obj ect is a part of the verb
stem ; in the second , the obj ect or benefactive suffix has been optionally
incorporated into the verb , occurring prior to the f inal verb stem syl lable .
Examples are :
r----1 ,�------,
( 2 64 ) hfr n - a a -m nfnpfn they ate the food
they they-ate- them food
r---l rt------"
( 26 5 ) hfrak k-ere-k- i r nu he chopped down a tree
he he-chopped-it-chopped tree
,--,
( 266) hf rak k - i t -t wek- h i he asked him . . .
he he-asked-him-asked
In both the tran sitive and intransitive verbs irregular forms occur . With
the occurrence of f irs t , second or third person , or singular , dual or plural
number , the stem of the verb changes and the person , gender and number of the
noun under focus is marked . Irregular verbs are of course not pecul iar to lan
guages of the Torr icel l i Phylum , but verb stems which inflect in this manner
are . Examples are :
I I
( 267 ) hi nfnpf m-e iyo I am hungry
I insides they-hunger me
A SKETCH OF AU MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX 261
, ,
( 268) h+rak n+np+ ma-aak he is hungry
he insides they-hunger him
r--I
( 2 69) hit k-e i yewo my leg hurts
leg it-pains me
r--I
( 27 0 ) hit k - e ke k his leg hurts
leg it-pains him
( See Chart F for a full paradigm of an irregular verb . )
, ,
( 27 1 ) m+t+k h+r-ak k-en yaank ( Subject)
man 3rd-sg masc he-went forest
the man went to the fores t
,
(272) m i te h f r- e w-en Yemnu ( Subject)
woman 3rd-sg fem she-went Yemnu
the woman went to Yemnu
r--I , -----"
r
(273) h + r a k k-ewe t -o menmen i -m ( Sub j ect , Obj ect )
he he-gave-me thing these
he gave me these things
Some further examples of bound subj ect and object pronouns i n cross-reference
with free subj ect pronouns are :
( 27 4 ) k-ere-k- i r he cut i t
he-cut�i t-cut
262 DAVID SCORZA
I ,
( 27 5 ) hfrak k-uwaa i k -e i t Yemnu he s lept at Yerrmu
he he-s lept he-at Yerrmu
rr r--T
( 27 6 ) h t re w-ew i s - t k k-tnfk wfnak she put it under the house
she she-put-it it-under house
These examples illustrate how the bound subj ect pronouns agree with the free
subj ect pronoun s , and the Location noun phrase agrees in ( 27 6 ) with the bound
pronominal obj ect , us ing a subj ect pronouns form to do so . Examples of the
possessive pronoun forms are :
..----,
(277) h t ne k -h ak his knife
knife it-his
nepere p - t r e
( 27 8 ) her fema le dog
dog she-hers
Note from these examples how the possessed item occurs in pr imary position and
the possessor follows .
5.3. F i na l comments
The features which have been described in this section are considered the
most unique features in the Au grammar . Because these do not fol low the
patterns usually found in Papuan languages , they must be considered in any
theory about the origin of Au and the whole Torr icelli Phylum . As a result
of these aberrant features , the languages along the foothills of the Torr ice l l i
mountains have been classif ied as a separate phylum , for they do not fit in
wel l with typological features manifested by the Trans-New Guinea Phylum or
the 3epik-Ramu Phylum .
6. TORR I CE L L I PHYLUM AF F I N I T I ES
6. 1 . Genera l rema rks
In this concluding section , we shall compare selected typological features
of Au grammar with languages from two other major l inguist ic areas . In doing
so , we hope to justify the c laims of Laycock who descr ibed the Torr ice l l i
Phylum as ' a genetic group i n itself ' ( 1 97 5 : 7 68 ) .
A family tree of Au and its position within the Torrice l l i Phylum is now
given , fol lowing Laycock ' s classif ication of Sepik languages ( 197 3 : 7 2 f f ) .
Laycock and Wurm ( 1964 : 7 7 f f ) have basically fol lowed the Swadesh lex ico
2
stat istical technique ( Swadesh 1952 and 1955c ) in grouping New Guinea language s .
However , they have modif ied the lex ical relationships signif icant for differen
tiating languages , families and stocks according to the following percentages :
1 5% - 25% same stock
40% - 55% different sub-families within the same family
6 0% - 81% languages of the same sub-family .
A SKETCH OF AU MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX 263
L�
west Wapei West Wapei One
Seta
Seti
Wapei -Palei Wapei 4 010
5 El.kei
6 Yau
7 Yis
8 Au
9 Yil
10 Ningil
11 Alu
12 Galu
13 Gnau
14 Valman
15 Yapunda
Palei 16 Aru
L
17 ArUOp
18 Aiku
19 Nambi
20 Kayik
21 Agi
22 Bragat
Urat 23 urat
A fam i l y tree of Au
264 DA VID SCORZA
voiced Phonologically,
and voiceless TPconsonants
languagesshowing
utiliseallophonic
three positionsvariation. of articulation,
There are with
usually
five vowelonphonemes
depending the appearing (mofinimally)
interpretation the , but vocoids
central there mayandbesequences
as many asthateight,occur.
There
some appears ofto betheaphylum.
families high proportionas cited
(010 ,
of fricative
by Laycock consonants,
is an at leastof this)
example in .
Morphologically, TPduallangua g es are number
characterised by.in pronouns,
a two (singular/plural) or
three
degree (singular,
ofoccur
concordance and plural)
especially system
betweenplural,the nouns andgender and have
the noun-adjuncts. a highThe
pronouns
the thirdconcordance in singular,
person (Au isismarked dual
an example and. showing
ofsetaofthreeprefixes
genderindistinction distinctions
system) in
. set
Subject
ofLaycock
prefixes functioning by
as relatorsa in relator-axis verbs, with the
phrasewi,thconstructions.same
given ( 197 5 : 768)
example from has
Au noted
using that
the these prefixes
interrogative occur
'why'. Although non-verbs
he and has
tentatively
suggests
typicalthatsubject
theprepositions the formconcordance
may be treated
occuring as ainverbotherweconstructions.
see it as merelyThereshowingare
phrase leve. l in TP languages, Finally,
constructions. and the nouns
the alwaysorder
typical precedeof words
their modifiers
is subjectin
verb-object
general Papuanandlanguages
this is radically different from the order manifested by the
in New Guinea.
6.4. Compa ri son of features
willNowexamine
wetypically that wethehavewayconsidered
expectedoutlined that
of the Papuanthe briefly thelanguages
Torricelli
languages.
typologicaldifferfeatures
TheseVoorhoeve from offeatures
each phylum,
appear below and are based
upon the features by Wurm, Laycock and ( 1 975 : 179-186 ) .
anyFollowing
patternsa general
which maycomparison, we then look more closely at the pronouns for
be of significance.
Trans-New Guinea Sepik-Ramu
Phylum Phylum Torricelli
Phylum
PHONOLOGY
place of
Articulation:
Series of stops: three
two to five three
usually to five
one three
one to five
Fricatives: generally one one or more several language per
Widely
consonant varying
allophones: present absent present
Stops
allophones:with fricative common rarely common
Basic vowel
Basic system:phonemes: five vowels three to five five to eight
A SKETCH OF AU MORPHOLOGY A�D SYNTAX 265
MORPHOLOGY
Complex morpho
logical system : very compl ex complex less complex
Nature of morpho logy : elaborate affixation uncompl icated uncompl icated
and inflection affixes affixation
Per son markers :
Dual form s : common common common
( singular-plural )
Tr ial forms : rare present common
( s ingu lar , dual ,
plural )
Inclu sive�exc lusive
in f irst person
non-singular : only medial ly ; rare rare absent
Sub j ect marking on
verbs : common common common
Obj ect marking on
verbs : common common common
Position of the
bound subj ect and
object in relation
to each other in separated or together separated
verb : together
Appearance of bound
subj ect or object
with non-verb word s : absent absent common
VERBS
Existential verbs : yes no no
verb stem-changes
according to the
person of obj ect or
benefic iary : in some cases rare common
266 DAVID SCORZA
SYNTAX
Basic word order : subject-obj ect-verb sUbj ect-ob j ect subject-verb
verb object
Subordinate c lause : general ly precedes precedes main precedessor
main clause clause follows
As has been indicated by the above compar ison , the three phyla which appear
acorss the horizontal parameter show a number of s imilar features . Of the
thirty ( 3 0) features compared , the Torr icelli Phylum has the least in common
with the other two : seventeen ( 1 7 ) of its features are d irectly opposed to the
Trans-New Gu inea Phylum , and thirteen ( 1 3 ) are opposed to features of the
Sepik-Ramu . The major factor to note is the d ifference in word order , which
shows the Torr icelli Phylum to be c loser to the Austrones ian languages in this
regard ; non-Austronesian languages maintain a subject-object-verb word order in
all language groups . This one factor may suggest that the placement of the
Torricelli Phylum in the non-Austrones ian language group is tenuou s . Another
factor is the lack of med ial verb forms which are so character istic of the
highland languages in particular , as wel l as others which make up the papuan
languages in New Guinea .
Language Gahuku Fore Awa Suena Barai Daga Selepet Iatmul Au 010
Gender
distinction no no no no no no no yes yes yes
Exc lu sive-
inclusive no no no yes no no no no no no
Person :
S ingular yes ye s yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
6 . 6. Conc l u s i on
Based upon the information given in this section about typical Papuan
languages ( the Trans-New Guinea and Sepik-Ramu Phylum) which have been compared
with the Torr icel li Phylum , it is not difficu l t to conclude that the TP lan
guages are aberrant in many features . Therefore , there is no difficu lty in
separating Au from the ranks of the Trans-New Guinea Phylum or the Sepik-Ramu
Phylum . For the present , then , we can only conclude that the Torr ice l l i Phylum
is a separate l ingu istic group which has affinities and differences not only
with non-Au stronesian languages , but with Austronesian languages as wel l .
APPEN D I X
A. Text i n Au ; ' The kill ing o f a l izard '
1. n f paae i n mH n-au hank i u n - owepna k .
before- there men they-sat men 's s leeping house they-conversed
ekr i t hfr n -a n - fm n - a n - t i ke te i pe
mor-ning they they-wi l l eat- them they-wi l l-with 8agO je l ly
o n - a n -wa t n f ke re k em hfr n - an - i m
or- they-wi l l-give ahi ldr-en them they they-wi l l-eat- them
Abbrev i a t i ons
A accompaniment
adj ad j ective
adv adverb
an animate
B benefactive
C contingent
em comment
cont continuous aspect marker
coord nphr co-ordinate noun phrase
D duration
Dc declarative
DD dependent ditransitive
DE dependent equative
D1 dependent intransitive
di . tr . verb ditransitive verb
dl dual
270 DAVID SCORZA "
OTOSE dependent
dependent
equative
stative
transitive
EREOfern equative
equative
feminine
duration
reason
genfutI nphr./gnp future noun phrase
general
instrument
10 independent ditransitive
IEIg independent
interrogative equative
II
imper/Ip independent
imperative intransitive
inst nphr
intr instrument noun phrase
intransitive
IOIS indirect objectstative(benefactive)
independent
IT
ITrC independent
intransitive transitive
contingent
ITrO
ITrP intransitive duration
intransitive purpose
ITrR
ITrSm intransitive
intransitive reason
simultaneous
L
ITR.v intransitive
location verb
loc phr.
masc location phrase
masculine
nneut noun
neuter
o
PsP object
purpose
phrpI predicate
phrase
pred/p plural
predicate
prnR pronoun
reason
R-Arecip/re relator-axisaction suffix
reciprocal
5
SOsing/sg subject
stative duration
SmSR singular
simul taneous
SSmstat stative
stative reason
simultaneous
stative
TPTpst.v stative verbPhylum
Torricelli
topic (comment)
tr v
trans. transitive
transitive verb
TrCTrP transitive contingent
transitive purpose
A SKETCH OF AU MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX 271
(b) Languages
stock. sharing to of their lexical items are the same
12% 28%
(c) micro-phylum.
Languages sharing to of their lexical items are the same
4% 12%
Wurm theirstateslexical
intopological that languages
items (for weremanysimilar
languages)in their structure
( 1 964 : 78 ) and asa theyresult,were
as
languages. features were also considered in classifying the New Guinea
3. Barai,
anallophonic which tois athemember
exception of the South-Eastern
generalisation that stops Trans-New
ana GuineatendPhylumto beis in
fricatives
variation. Both stops and fricatives occur as phonemes.
4.
byThesestudents
1977 ,
featuresforwerecoursemaderequirements
UTA.
available byinKarlnon-Indo-European
Franklin from papers language submitted
studies,
5. Robert
tothedescribeYoungtheof phenomenon
SIL in PapuaofNewtwoGuinea first used
oppositions monofocal andnumberpolyfocal
subjectMonofocal
in boundrefers Young says,axis to singular of
pronounalongforms.the vertical of focus on the •
First A B C
Second D F F
Third E G G
B I BL I OGRAPHY
LYNCH , J .
1975 Oral/nasal alternation and the realis/ irreal is d i st inction in
Oceanic languages . Oceanic Lingu i s t i cs 14/2 : 87-99 .
PIKE , K . L . and E . G . PIKE
1977 Gramma t i cal anal ysi s . Arl ington : The Summer Institute of
Lingu i stics and the University of Texas .
SCHANE , Sanford A .
1973a Genera t i ve phonology . Engl ewood Cliffs , N . J . : Prentice-Hal l .
SCORZA , David P .
1973 Sentence structures of the Au language . In Alan Healey , ed .
Workpapers in Papua New Guinea l anguages 1 , 165-246 . Ukarumpa ,
Papua New Gu inea : S . I . L .
YOUNG , Robert A .
1971 The verb in Bena-Bena : i ts form a n d funct ion . PL , B-18 .
WURM , S . A.
1964 Australian New Guinea highlands languages and the d istr ibution of
the ir topological features . In James B . Watson , ed . New Guinea ,
the central hi ghl ands . American Anthropologi st 66/4 ( 2 ) : 7 9-97 .
1976 New Guinea area l an guages and l anguage study , vol . 2 : Austronesian
l anguages . PL , C-3 9 .
WURM , S . A . , ed .
1975 New Guinea area l anguages a n d l anguage study , vol . l : Papuan
languages and the New Guinea l i ngui stic scene . PL , C-3 8 .
Scorza, D. "A sketch of Au morphology and syntax". In Adams, K., Lauck, L., Miedema, J., Welling, F., Stokhof, W., Flassy, D., Oguri, H., Collier, K., Gregerson, K., Phinnemore, T., Scorza, D., Davies, J., Comrie, B. and Abbott, S. editors, Papers in New Guinea Linguistics No. 22.
A-63:215-273. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1985. DOI:10.15144/PL-A63.215
©1985 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative.