Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Contents
1 Introduction 2
1
Binomial Theorem: Positive integral index 2
1 Introduction
Let’s start by multiplying out (x + a)(x + b)(x + c)(x + d). By actual multiplication it is easy to
check that
We may, however, write this result by a bit of observation. The complete product consists of
the sum of a number of partial products each of which is formed by multiplying together four
letters, one being taken from each of the four factors. Examining the way in which the various
partial products are taken, we observe:
(i) the term x4 is formed by taking the letter x out of each of the factors.
(ii) the terms involving x3 are formed by taking the letter x out of any three factors, in every
way possible, and one of the letters a, b, c, d out of the remaining factor.
(iii) the terms involving x2 are formed by taking the letter x out of any two factors, in every
way possible, and two of the letters a, b, c, d out of the remaining factors.
(iv) the terms involving x are formed by taking x out of any one factor, and three of the letters
a, b, c, d out of the remaining factors.
which is a special case of the more general result (1). This approach of deducing a special case
from a general one is sometimes more easier than to find the special case directly. Next, we use
this approach to prove the Binomial theorem.
(x + a1 )(x + a2 )(x + a3 ) · · · (x + an )
In S1 the number of terms is n; in S2 the number of terms is the same as the number of selections
of 2 objects from a set of n, that is, n C2 ; in S3 the number of terms is n C3 ; and so on.
Now, suppose a1 = a2 = a3 = . . . = an = a. Then S1 becomes n C1 a; S2 becomes n C2 a2 ; and
so on. Thus,
♣ Remark 1. The numbers nC are also called the binomial numbers because they occur in the
r
binomial expansion.
♣ Remark 2. Note that the expansion on the right contains n + 1 terms.
♣ Remark 3. The binomial theorem might also be proved by using the principle of mathematical
induction on n.
Replacing a by −a in Eq. (1), we obtain the expansion of (x − a)n :
Now remembering the fact that n Cr = n Cn−r , after calculating the coefficients up to 7 C3 , the rest may
be written down at once; 7 C4 = 7 C3 ; 7 C5 = 7 C2 ; and so on. Thus, after calculating the values of 7 Cr
for r = 0, 1, 2, . . . , 7, we get
The simplest form of the binomial theorem is the expansion of (1 + x)n . This is obtained
from the general formula of Eq. (1) by replacing x by 1 and a by x. Thus,
(1 + x)n = n C0 + n C1 x + n C2 x2 + n C3 x3 + . . . + n Cn−1 xn−1 + n Cn xn (4)
Further, replacing x by −x in the above expression, we obtain the expansion of (1 − x)n :
(1 − x)n = n C0 − n C1 x + n C2 x2 − n C3 x3 + . . . + (−1)n−1 n Cn−1 xn−1 + (−1)n n Cn xn (5)
Proof. Trivial
#I DIP 3. In the expansion of (1 + x)n , the sum of the odd coefficients equals the sum of the
even coefficients, each being equal to 2n−1 , i.e.
n
C0 + n C2 + n C4 + . . . = n C1 + n C3 + n C5 + . . . = 2n−1 (9)
Proof. We know
(1 + x)n = n C0 + n C1 x + n C2 x2 + n C3 x3 + . . . + n Cn xn
Setting x = −1, we obtain
0 = n C0 − n C1 + n C2 − n C3 + n C4 − . . . + (−1)n n Cn
Collecting all the even terms which have minus sign in front of them on one side, we obtain
n
C0 + n C2 + n C4 + . . . = n C1 + n C3 + n C5 + . . . = S (say)
From Eq.(8), we have
2n = ( n C0 + n C2 + n C4 + . . .) + ( n C1 + n C3 + n C5 + . . .)
= S + S = 2S
⇒ S = 2n−1
Thus, we get Eq. (9)
#I DIP 4 (Pascal triangle). The following property leads to the construction of the Pascal’s
triangle:
n
Cr + n Cr+1 = n+1 Cr+1 (10)
Proof. Suppose we want to construct a subset containing r + 1 objects from a set of n + 1 objects.
For this purpose, we just have to select r + 1 objects from the given set. This can be done in
n+1 C
r+1 ways and this number also becomes the number of such subsets.
On the other hand, we can construct those subsets when one particular object is always to be
included in our subsets or when one particular object is always left out. In this case, we obtain
the required number as n Cr + n Cr+1 and since these two ways of generating subsets gives the
total number of subsets containing r + 1 objects, we get Eq. (10).
1C 1C
0 1
2C 2C 2C
0 1 2
3C 3C 3C 3C
0 1 2 3
4C 4C 4C 4C 4C
0 1 2 3 4
5C 5C 5C 5C 5C 5C
0 1 2 3 4 5
This pyramidal structure of binomial numbers shows the beginning of what is referred to as the
Pascal triangle. Its construction utilizes Eq. (10) by keeping in mind that n represents a row
while r specifies a column of a row. Thus Eq. (10), in words, state that to get a element (except
the leading element in each row) in this triangle, just add the two elements diagonally left and
right up.
We can replace each binomial number by its value to get another version of Pascal triangle:
1
1 1
1 2 1
1 3 3 1
1 4 6 4 1
1 5 10 10 5 1
In this form, it is quite easy to see that each element except the leading 1’s, is the sum of the two
numbers immediately above it. This property of the Pascal triangle enables us to generate the
triangle very fast, building it up row by row. It also gives us a tool to prove many properties of
the binomial coefficients. For example, let’s ask: what is the sum of squares of elements in each
row?
Let’s experiment, by computing the sum of squares of elements in the the first few rows:
12 = 1,
12 + 12 = 2,
12 + 22 + 12 = 6,
12 + 32 + 32 + 12 = 20,
12 + 42 + 62 + 42 + 12 = 70
We may recognize these numbers as the numbers in the middle column of the Pascal triangle.
Of course, only every second row contains an entry in the middle column, so the last value above,
the sum of squares in row No. 4, is the middle element in row No. 8. So the examples above
suggest the following identity:
#I DIP 5. The binomial numbers satisfy
n
C0 2 + n C1 2 + n C2 2 + n C3 2 + . . . + n Cn 2 = 2n
Cn (11)
Proof. Of course, the few experiments above do not prove that this identity always holds, so
we need a proof. We will give an interpretation of both sides of the identity as the result of
a counting problem; it will turn out that they count the same things, so they are equal. It is
obvious what the right hand side counts: the number of subsets of size n of a set of size 2n. It
will be convenient to choose, as our 2n–element set, the set S = {1, 2, 3, . . . , 2n}.
The combinatorial interpretation of the left hand side is not so easy. Consider a typical term,
say n Cr 2 . We claim that this is the number of those n-element subsets of S that contain exactly
r elements from the set {1, 2, 3, . . . , n} (the first half of our set). In fact, how do we choose such
an n-element subset of S? We choose the first r elements from {1, 2, . . . , n} and the remaining
n − r from {n + 1, n + 2, . . . , 2n}. The first part can be done in n Cr ways; no matter which
r-element subset of {1, 2, . . . , n} we selected, we have n Cn−r to choose the other part. Thus the
number of ways to choose an n-element subset of S having r elements from {1, 2, . . . , n} is
n
Cr n Cn−r = n Cr 2 since n
Cr = n Cn−r
Now to get the total number number of n-element subsets of S, we have to sum these numbers
for all values of k = 0, 1, 2, . . . , n. This proves Eq. (11).
To get another proof of the above property, expand (1 + x)2n in two ways: first, straight
forward apply binomial expansion; second write (1 + x)2n = (1 + x)n (1 + x)n , expand each term,
multiply out term by term and look for the coefficient of xn in both cases — first and second.
I mention the following two properties of binomial numbers (without proof), which you might
try to prove as exercises.
#I DIP 6 (Vondermonde’s identity).
n
C0 m Ck + n C1 m Ck−1 + n C2 m Ck−2 + . . . + n Ck m C0 = n+m
Ck (12)
#I DIP 7.
n n+1 n+2 n+3 n+k n+k+1
C0 + C1 + C2 + C3 + . . . + Ck = Ck (13)
Now since r can only vary between 0 and n + 1, the ratio (n + 1)/r is always more than or
n+1
equal to 1. As such the left side of the previous inequality reduces to − 1 and we obtain
r
n+1 |x| (n + 1)|a|
−1≥ ⇒ r≤
r |a| |x| + |a|
We must select the integral value of r consistent with this inequality. To that end, we just set r
as the greatest integer contained in the right side of the last inequality. Thus, the required value
of r is given by · ¸
(n + 1)|a|
r= (14)
|x| + |a|
where [α] represents the greatest integer less than or equal to α. Specifically, if α is a real number
such that, for an integer N ,
Once the value of r is determined, the numerically greatest term is the (r + 1)th term, i.e. Tr+1 .
Example 7. If x = 31 , find the greatest term in the expansion of (1 + 4x)8 .
Solution: Using Eq. 14 with n = 8, x = 1, and a = 4x = 34 , we obtain
4 · ¸
9× 36
3
r= = =5
4 7
1+
3
Thus, the greatest term is the sixth one, and its value is
µ ¶5
8 4 57344
C5 =
3 243
Thus, the numerically greatest term is the fifth one, its value being 9 C4 × 35 × (−2)4 = 489888.
It is quite obvious that the coefficients A, B, C, D, . . . are functions of m and n, and therefore
the actual values of these coefficients for a given case will depend on the values of m and n in
that case. But the way in which the coefficients of the powers of x in (16) and (17) combine
to give A, B, C, . . . is quite independent of m and n. In other words, whatever values m and n
might have, A, B, C, . . . preserve the same invariable form. If therefore we can determine the
form of A, B, C, . . . for any particular values of m and n, we conclude that A, B, C, . . . will have
the same form for all values of m and n.
We make use of this idea to construct a general proof of binomial theorem for any index.
(The original idea is due to Euler.) But before that, the result follows:
¯ Theorem 2. For a variable x satisfying |x| < 1 and a real number α, the following holds true:
Proceeding in this manner we can show that (with slight change in notations)
p
Now, if we set m1 = m2 = m3 = . . . = mk = , where p is a positive integer, the last equality
k
gives us
n ³ p ´ok
f = f (p)
k
But since p is a positive integer, f (p) = (1 + x)p . Thus, we obtain
n ³ p ´ok ³p´
f = (1 + x)p ⇒ f = (1 + x)p/k
k k
³p´
But, by assumption, f stands for
k
p ³p ´ p ³p ´³p ´
p − 1 − 1 − 2
1+ x+ k k x2 + k k k x3 + . . .
k 2! 3!
Thus, we obtain,
p ³p ´ p ³p ´³p ´
p − 1 − 1 − 2
(1 + x)p/k =1+ x+ k k x2 + k k k x3 + . . . (19)
k 2! 3!
which proves the Binomial theorem for any positive fractional index.
since all terms of the series except the first vanish. Therefore,
1
= f (−n)
f (n)
♣ Remark 4. Since for an arbitrary index α, the coefficients of the powers of x in the expansion
of (1 + x)α cannot be expressed via the binomial numbers, the general term in this case must be
written in full:
α(α − 1)(α − 2)(α − 3) · · · (α − r + 1) r
Tr+1 = x (21)
r!
Also the coefficient of the general term can never vanish unless one of the factors of its numerator
is zero; the series will therefore stop at the (r + 1)th term, when n − r + 1 is zero; that is when
r = n + 1; but since r is a positive integer this equality can never hold except when the index n is
positive and integral. Thus the expansion by Binomial theorem extends to n + 1 terms only, when
n is a positive integer, and to an infinite number of terms in all other cases. As such, convergence
(which we shall not take up for the moment) is an issue for an arbitrary α. We shall for the
moment note that the series expansion of (1 + x)α for any real α is valid only when |x| < 1.
♣ Remark 5. For a negative integer −n (where n is positive integer), the expansion of (1 + x)−n
can be written in terms of the binomial numbers (also shown is Tr+1 ):
***************************