REPORT ON STUDENTS

PERFORMANCE FOR
PERSONAL SKILLS
DEVELOPMENT MODULE,
CO201

COHORT 2012-2014

TRAINERS INVOLVED : G. VEERASAMY

12-JUNE-14
Performance Report –Personal skills development Module
Semester 2, cohort 2010-2012

Candidates having re-sit Semester exam in the module.

6 candidates have to re-sit for exams in the Personal Skills Development module

These 6 candidates are as follows:

1. Azemoth Louis Gergino Hensley

2. Boodhun Dristy Keshav
3. Bulluck Namrata Aruna Devi
4. Mohunsing Kishan
5. Moorjee Yohan Alexandre
6. Nagawa Varun

However the candidates did rather well in the continuous assessment as shown in the table 1.0.

Table 1.0 show the student performance in continuous assessment (internal)

INCOURSE MARKS
SN CANDIDATE NAME (100 MARKS)

Azemoth Louis Gergino

1 52
Hensley
2 Boodhun Dristy Keshav 70
3 Bulluck Namrata Aruna Devi 68
4 Mohunsing Kishan 56
5 Moorjee Yohan Alexandre 60
6 Nagawa Varun 76

2|Page
Performance Report –Personal skills development Module
Semester 2, cohort 2010-2012

Candidates having to retake continuous assessment or whole module

Seven candidates got a resit in continuous assessment or in whole module (both coursework and semester exam). Out
of these 7 candidates, 2 candidates (Lubine Didier Kendy and Ramdowar M. O. Reza) has been considered as drop out as
he has secured a job since September 2013. 1 candidate (Shiblall Dhanush Akash) expressed his intentions of dropping
out and lost motivation and was scarcely present in class during the second half of the semester despite our efforts and
was considered as drop out.

As for the remaining 4 candidates, records show that they did not submit 1 or more of the 4 assignments given despite
being given extensions. Furthermore signs of plagiarism was detected in 1 of the coursework among the majority of the
students. Again a warning and an extension was given for re-submission and all but 2 of the 4 re-sit candidates re-
submitted their work. Final reminder was sent by email to the candidates on 15/10/2013

General Comments

1. Out of the 7 candidates for has obtained a re-sit in coursework or whole module, 3 are considered as drop out.
2. Candidates who failed in coursework did so because they either did not submit their work or because they did
not resubmit their own work when requested despite having given extensions and reminders until the very end
of the semester.
3. Candidates who failed in the semester examination did rather well during the coursework and were expected to
perform better.

3|Page