Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
In 1992, an article by Robert Kaplan and David Norton entitled "The Balanced
Scorecard - Measures that Drive Performance" in the Harvard Business Review caused
a lot of attention for their method, and led to their business bestseller, "The Balanced
Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action", published in 1996.
The financial performance of an organization is essential for its success. Even non-profit
organizations must deal in a sensible way with funds they receive. However, a pure
financial approach for managing organizations suffers from two drawbacks:
1. Financial perspective.
2. Customer perspective.
3. Business process perspective.
4. Learning and growth perspective.
This allows the monitoring of present performance, but the method also tries to capture
information about how well the organization is positioned to perform in the future.
Kaplan and Norton cite the following benefits of the usage of the
Balanced Scorecard:
The integration of these four perspectives into a one graphical appealing picture, has
made the Balanced Scorecard method very successful as a management methodology.
Objectives, Measures, Targets, and Initiatives
More than 60% of organizations claim to use a balanced storecard approach. Firms as
diverse as Blue Cross. Verizon, and rhe Mayo Clinic have used this approach to align
performance measures with their organizational strategy. Using the balanced storecard
requires spending considerable rime and effort to identify the appropriate HR measures
in each of the four areas and how they tie to strategic organizational success. The
balanced scorecard should align with company goals and focus on results. To be
effective, the HR scorecard should address three elements—accountability, validity, and
actionable results. However, regardless of the time and effort spent trying to develop
and use objective measures in the balanced scorecard, subjectivity in what is selected
and how the measures are interpreted can still occur.