7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.

com

Navigation

The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q.

Posted by : Don Solaris On : April 7, 2014 26

Category: roland
Tags: jd990, jv1080, jv2080, jv80, jv90, roland, xp30, xp50, xp60, xp80, xv5050,
xv5080

Super JV vs XV series
Following the JV/XP series were Roland’s XV series: 5080, 5050 and 3080.
XV-5080 is mixed content 32kHz and 44.1 kHz. I got this later confirmed by
Roland. (though some web pages list it as 32kHz ROM only, but this is not
true). I will focus now on XV-5050 and compare it with JV-1080. Some users
started complaining about the XV-5050 sounding a bit “thin”. There is some
truth in that but what i can tell in reply is that 5050 sounds more hi-fi.
Because of 44.1k sample content, some energy has been “lost” due to
wider frequency coverage. Patches played on 1080 and 5050 side by side
will sound different. This is a fact that i’ve verified myself. 5050 is more hi-fi
and has that extra sheen while 1080 is more darker and is a bit more mix
friendly when it comes to frequency and EQ. You will find some waveforms
more hi fi sounding in XV when compared to Super JV series.

It should be worth mentioning that 5050 has some sort of permanent HPF
filter at about 30 Hz, so you’ll definitely get a little bit less bass. But the
high freq response is just spectacular if compared to something like a JV-
1080. Especially when you start using the digital output and route it directly
into DAW, it’s a no match in crystal clear sound.

One thing that is very different on 5050 vs 1080 is the dynamics. For some
reason it seems that 5050 has some sort of compressor at its output. As a
result, some of the patches have less dynamics going on in them. This is
most obvious on layered sounds that have a lot of phasing between
oscillators going on. While the same patch on 1080 will produce more
differences in volume, on 5050 it is more constant. This can be good or bad,
depending what kind of sound you need. For movie/TV scores you would
probably want more dynamics going on, hence the 1080. And for dance
music, you would go 5050 since it delivers that straight – in your face sound
http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 1/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

– right out of the box, without need to work on dynamics. For the above
reasons 1080 definitely sounds more soft and gentle.

As of XV-5080, there does not seem to be any permanent high pass filtering
going on. I should also mention that 5080 has some really good converters
inside. Tested it side by side against XP-30 on the same patches and the
difference was quite noticeable in what appears to be a far greater stereo
field and definitely superior sonic quality of 5080 effects. I particularly
remember one preset called Letter From Pat. In fact if you have both units,
just load it and hear the difference for yourself. It’s day night difference in
favor of 5080.

JD-990 vs. XV series

XV series contain the whole JD-990 waveform set. With XV-3080 being 32k
and XV-5080 and XV-5050 with original 44.1kHz JD set. Some of the
waveforms have been renamed, but they are there. It should be said that
XV series have a destructive form of compression similar to mp3 and it can
be spotted visually with most simple analyzer. There is no such compression
on JD series. More on that in one of the chapters below.

Patch conversion JD into XV is directly not possible. However it would be

possible to convert (manually) a patch from JD-990 into 5050 since Roland
implemented the whole “Effects Block A” section from JD into 5050
(available as EFX called JD Mlt). Block B can be emulated with Chorus/Delay
and Reverb. There is a whole article on this subject available on this
website. Only difference is the filter cutoff numeration system. On JD-990 it
goes from 0 to 99 while on 5050 it is 0 to 127.

There were some rumors on various forums that XV-5080 is 32kHz (thus
being able to play only up to 16kHz). This however is simply not true. We
will now take a look at a waveform spectra of a White Noise sample as
played from JD-990 and XV-5080. What we can clearly see is that not only
they are identical but they both go all the way up to 22kHz, which clearly
indicates 44.1k playback.

Benefits of XV over JD is that the filter on XV has a greater dynamic range.

There is no clipping issue on XV as opposed to JD when you set filter
keytracking to 100%, find a resonant spot, press a chord and end up in
harsh digital distortion (if resonance is above 40). Not only XV won’t distort,
http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 2/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

but even if it happens on some waveforms, there is one additional

parameter called oscillator Gain that lets you reduce the volume of the
waveform prior to being fed into filter. You can set it to 0dB or even -6dB.
On JD it appears to be permanently set to +6dB (of XV equivalent) which is
a pity. That’s the only feature i can’t regret not having on JD. Of course one
thing that is very known is that there is definitely a difference in the high
end of the filter. JD-990 will go a little bit higher in frequency and thus add
more sweetness. The rest of the frequency range response is almost
identical.

The Sound
There has been a lot of talk about difference in sound within units that
should be based on the same engine. We will here list the converters used
which might indicate why some minor sonic differences. There’s an old
rumor that the film guys prefer the sound of 1080 against newer the XV
series such as 5050. This is a bit complex matter since it involved dynamics
and not just frequency, and i have explained it in a chapter above. Let’s
now take a look at converters of JV and JD units (notice: XP is a JV with a
keyboard)

JV­80   32k  sample rate DAC: 18­bit PCM69P
JV­90   32k  sample rate DAC: 18­bit PCM69AU­1
JV­880  32k  sample rate DAC: 18­bit PCM69AP (main out)*
JV­1080 32k  sample rate DAC: 18­bit UPD63200GS­E2
JV­2080 32k  sample rate DAC: 18­bit PCM69AU
XP­30   32k  sample rate DAC: 24­bit AK4324
XP­50   32k  sample rate DAC: 18­bit UPD63200GS­E2
XP­60   32k  sample rate DAC: 18­bit PCM69AU
XP­80   32k  sample rate DAC: 18­bit PCM69AU
JD­800  44k1 sample rate DAC: 18­bit PCM61
JD­990  44k1 sample rate DAC: 18­bit PCM61P
* uses UPD6376GS­E2 for sub out

JV/XP use destructive form of wave compression (mp3 style)

JD does not use such kind of waveform compression
however both use waveform companding 16bit->8bit 1:2 compression
ratio

Some people claim they can hear the difference of JV-1080 vs. JV-2080.
Unfortunately i don’t have them side by side to verify this, but if someone
can, simply load the same patch, record it and send it to me or on the
Gearslutz forum and we will inspect it. The rumor is that 1080 sounds
“better”, whatever that means. Only thing i can confirm is that converters
on the JD-990 sound way better (more stereo width) than those on JV-1080.
In fact, it’s probably the best sounding synthesizer that Roland ever
designed. Hearing is believing and you should really give it a try if you
http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 3/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

didn’t by now. There’s a reason why JD-990 scores for much more than
2080, although from technical standpoint, 2080 offers much more
waveforms and has better mod matrix.

Some quick points: Over the years i’ve had following machines JD-990, JV-
1000, JV-1080, XP-50, XP-30, XV-5080, XV-5050. From first hand
experience: if you want a lot of sounds and not the quality, XP-30 is an
absolute winner. It you want max quality, then go either JD-990 or XV-5080.
If you care for the high sheen filter sound, go with JD-990 as it can pull out
the way XV-5080 can’t. But 5080 has much more waveforms (including
some from Vintage Expansion) and has far superior effects, filter dynamic
range and modulation engine (it features true matrix system). On top of
that it can be used as a sample player since it has a “S-760 mode” (though
that limits a lot of synthesis functions).

Compatibility
Even the latest XV-5080 has a full backward compatibility, all the way to the
JV-80. You can also load all of the patches from JV-80, JV-90 and JV-1000 into
JV-1080 and JV-2080. Just like you can load JV-1080 patches into the last of
the series XV-3080, XV-5080 and XV-5050. They are all full compatible with
only a few minor exceptions when it comes to waveforms. Even the old JV-
80 patch will sound identical if you properly convert it. Some correction in
resonance is needed because old models JV-80, JV-90 and JV-1000 had a
Soft and Hard resonance setting, next to the resonance amount. Because
JV-80 has two resonance settings, Soft and Hard. Their equivalent on Super
JV and XV is as following:

JV-80 Soft setting, resonance set to max = XV-5080 reso set to 44

JV-80 Hard setting, resonance set to max = XV-5080 reso set to 88

What applies to XV-5080 applies to all Super JV and XP series. I came with
this info by testing them side by side. This also gives you idea that the filter
in JV-1080 can go way beyond old JV in resonance power. This is not
surprising since it is a filter from the JD series. To cut the long story short,
whenever you load a JV-80 patch into Super JV or XV you will have to modify
the resonance value.

Antialiasing filter in Super JV is superior to the one in JV – which, depending

on what kind of sound you like, is welcome or not so feature. Mirroring in
higher frequencies, particularly when using rich textures can fool the
listener thinking the unit is 44kHz waveform set, though in reality it is not, it
is 32kHz just like Super JV. I talk about mirroring above 16kHz which can
happen during transposition, thought the waveforms are all 32 kHz. This is
just an artifact that happens with low interpolation quality algorithms. So in
a way, old JV can sound a bit more open than the later Super JV series,
because of the weaker anti alias filter in JV.

Patches
JV-1080 contains some of the JV-80 patches. JV-2080 contains all JV-1080
http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 4/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

patches plus a bank of additional ones. XV-5080 and 3080 contain all of the
JV-2080 patches, plus a few new banks. XV-5050 contains all XV-5080
patches plus a bank of additional Fantom patches (these are located in the
User area 1-128).

Destructive compression
With the Super JV series Roland used a destructive form of waveform
compression which is very similar to mp3. Those parts of the spectra that
are low in volume are simply erased. By observing same waveforms on JD-
990 which does not use this form of compression and comparing it to the
later JV series, it is easy to conclude that. Here is one example that clearly
demonstrates it.

The same waveform was chosen on JD-990 and XV-5080. Please ignore the
mirror effect label on the image, it relates to interpolation and that
shouldn’t concern us. If we look at the waveform from 5080 somewhere
around 15kHz we can clearly see a hole. There are a lot of such waveforms
in Super JV and XV series that have holes in them. Very similar how mp3
works. And as you can see there are no such holes in JD-990 which makes it
clear that JD-990 does not use destructive form of waveform compression. It
does use some other form though, but we will discuss that below.

Companding compression
Both the JD and Super JV series use a companding form of waveform
compression often expressed with 1:2 waveform ratio. Here is how it works.
Once the waveforms are sampled at the factory, they are being dynamically
compressed and converted to 8 bit. The reason why they are compressed
prior to that is to preserve low level information and somehow increase the
dynamic range of this 8 bit file. At that stage they are put into machine’s
ROM. Once the machine boots up it will load a waveform, convert it to 16 bit
and apply dynamic expansion. Essentially the same thing what a
compressor and expander that you have in your rack do. This way a
compression of 1:2 waveform ROM has been achieved. This dates back into
days when memory was very expensive, and manufacturers were looking
way to squeeze as much as possible into fixed ROM space. Companding was
on of the options where for every 16 bits of input, you would use only 8 bit
to store them, yet with some tricks “preserve” the data.

The question now arises: does that make Super JV and JD series 8-bit
machines? Well technically speaking no. These are not just plain 8 bit
samples in the ROM but 8-bit companded samples. It makes a difference,
because prior to being played, their original 16 bit dynamic range is
partially restored. It should also be noted that this is the stage were a lot of
“magic” is happening. By that i mean Roland’s (probably) custom
algorithms to make these waveforms sound so musical and rich in sound. If
it is the most simple μ-law companding algorithm, then hats off to Roland,
they did a pretty good job. I haven’t meet a person that doesn’t like the
sound of Super JV series and they would hardly believe these originate from
8 bit samples.
http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 5/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

History tree

Timeline:

JV-80 (1991) = a true masterpiece of it’s time.

JV-880 (1992) = rack vesion of JV-80.
JV-1000 (1993) = JV-80 + MC-50mkII sequencer, added new
waveforms, floppy drive, 76 key.
JV-90 (1994 ) = JV-1000, without sequencer and floppy.
JV-1080 (1994) = huge step forward for Roland. This was the most
popular module of 90’s. New filters, voice structures, 448 waveforms,
matrix control, new features.
XP-50 (1995) = JV-1080 with keyboard, sequencer, floppy
JV-2080 (1997) = JV-1080 big LCD (better user interface), 3 EFX, 8 x
expansion slots.

http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 6/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

XP-80 (1996) = XP-50 with 320 x 80 dot LCD (better user interface), 4
aditional sliders, more outputs, arpeggiator, 76 key.
XP-60 (1998) = 61 key version of XP-80. It replaced the XP-50.
XP-30 (1999) = XP-60 with added patches (waveforms) from three
expansion boards (session, orchestral, techno), removed sequencer. By
number of factory installed waveforms, this is the most powerfull XP
and JV synth!
JV-1010 (1999 ) = JV-1080 in half rack module, session patches
(waveforms) added.
XV-5080 (2000) = another big step forward for Roland. 1083
waveforms, 128 polyphony, true stereo voice – each tone (T1-T4) can
be set as stereo (one waveform for the left, one for the right channel),
SCSI connection, sample load, up to 128 MB of RAM (SIMM), 5 effects
processors: 24-bit reverbs, COSM® modeling, RSS 3D effects plus
standard JV’s Chorus and Reverb/Delay.
XV-3080 (2000) = XV-5080 without sample playback option, without
COSM effects processor, smaller display.
XV-88 (2000) = keyboard version of XV-3080.
XV-5050 (2001) = XV-5080, without sample playback option, without
SR-JV80 boards slots, polyphony reduced to 64, very small display. Size
reduced to 1U, added USB support (editing via PC).
XV-2020 (2002) = XV-5050 in half rack module but no RSS effects, no
COSM efx, no SR-JV80 boards slots, sound editing only via PC.

What was before JV-80?

JV-80 is based on PCM (Pulse Code Modulation) waveform playback. First of
such made by Roland was model D-50 (1987), which became very popular.
Not just only in the late 80’s, but also in 90’s (because of it’s analog
synthesis emulation part which is quite powerfull – 4 oscillators per patch,
nice smooth 12 dB resonant filter, 6 LFO’s, pulse width modulation). Next
PCM synthesizer from Roland was U-110, which was later replaced by U-220
along with keyboard version labeled U-20. It was a very limited synthesizer
with no filters of any kind, no assignable LFO’s, primitive pitch and vibrato
adjustments (no envelope). The U-20 was in 1990 followed by U-50 which
will be in the last minute renamed to D-70 due to popularity of D-50. D-70
had upgraded U-20 engine, some new waveforms and most importantly it
added a resonant multimode filter. D-70 is definitely one of the most
mysterious Roland synths, often overlooked and forgotten. The reason
might be a bit hard user interface which has some impractical solutions that
can make your life harder rather than easier. In parallel to D-70, Roland put
out MV-30 which is very similar engine with added MC-50 sequencer. Finally
in 1991 the JV-80 came out and this is where the legend began.

Outro
This is a FAQ for all of the Roland JD, JV, XP and XV series. If you have any
questions, please ask them and i will add them to this article.

Previous Post
Dynacord DRP-20 review

http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 7/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

Next Post
Waldorf Streichfett Demo (making of)

Comments (26)

Ryan
June 30, 2014 at 10:41

Dear Don,
I recently got a JD990 and after owning a JV2080 and it blew
my mind. To my ears the 2080 is a somewhat flat and uninspiring sounding
synth and now I have the JD it’s just killed any love I had for my JV.
I used to think there was something peculiar with the 2080 and you article
has justified my curiosities.
My question now is do you think the SR-JV80 expansion boards sound better
in the JD990 than the JV series and how so? What boards other than vintage
synth are the best for the JD990? Finally are there sysex banks available for
all the boards anywhere online?
Thanks for your site, it’s great, found you on gearsluts.
Best Wishes,
Ryan

Reply

Don Solaris
August 4, 2014 at 18:26

First, sorry for the late reply. The expansion boards

might sound slightly different due to different
effects structure. However, these boards are 32k
sample rate, there you should not expect some drastic difference in
JD-990. One of the second best boards is definitely Super Sound Set.
Why? Nearly all of the waveforms, patches and rhythm sets found in
Roland’s highly acclaimed SO-PCM Card Series have been included
on the SR-JV80-07 Expansion Board. This board is overlooked by
many and not in high demand. However, Vintage Board was made
for JD-990 therefore it’s still first choice. Then there’s the expensive
Keyboards Of The 60’s and 70’s, which is fine, but for that amount
you can get S-760 and CD ROM with the same title. S-760 has
similar filter to JD-990. If interested in S series, check Gearslutz for
more info on screen monitors. These machines are bargain for what
they offer.

http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 8/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

Reply

Michele Luppi
August 10, 2014 at 13:00

Hi Don!
I’ve read all I could about you and I must say I’m glad there
are people like you around. Music needs competence!
I’m a singer/former keyboardist trying to realize what happened over the last
20 years or so. I started with R. Alpha Juno 2 (though I was 13 in ’87), I love
Analog and the first pure digital stuff. Can’t help it: I love my JD-990, D-550
and MKS-70, can’t dig many of JV, JX and so on. Here’s my question. Recently
I fixed all my old gear and bought some 80’s Synths I could not afford when
they came out. When I think of my first experience in a real Studio using S-
770 I remember the clearness and pureness (but still warm) sounds coming
out of it. My guts never lied so far… So… Can the XV-5080 be comparable
soundwiae to the S-770 or did I just fell in love with those 80’s converters?
Thank you.
Michele Luppi from Italy

Reply

Don Solaris
August 12, 2014 at 18:54

Converters in XV-5080 are fantastic along with the

included DSP processors. Just by playing something
like XP-30 side by side XV-5080 you can
immediately hear the difference – mode stereo width, more
presence in the tone, it’s just better sounding. The S-770 had one of
the best converters in the era. I believe Apogee made them (the old
Apogee, not the new commercial mass-product-Apogee). Anyway S-
770 always had incredible sound, however VCF filters are a bit
different, therefore it would be hard to compare patches side by
side. We will never know the truth – which sound better 770 or
5080. If i would have to pick one, i would go 770 but that’s just my
personal choice. Those older converters have some magic about
them, maybe they aren’t perfect (as in 5080) but they are so
musical. They just sing all the time. If i didn’t had 770 i’d had 5080
for sample playback (since it has a special S-760 mode where it can
function as a sample player with all the S-760 features minus
sampling). Hope this helps! For more, please visit Gearslutz.com
forum. We go into details… a lot!

Reply

http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 9/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

Michele Luppi
August 15, 2014 at 08:50
Well Don, THANK YOU!!!! You actually
answered me and I’m VERY happy to share
your thought… I needed the best opinion
and you gave it to me! I will become a member of gearslutz
for sure… If I ever find a S-770 (mint conditions) I’ll put your
name on my special thanks in the booklet of the Album!
M

Reply

Joe F
September 29, 2014 at 11:24

Hi. Great article.

I’m torn between the 5080, and the 5050.
How much of a difference in quality is there between these two? I
understand the converters on the 5080 are better, but is it a deal breaker?
Also, does the 5080 contain all the 1080 patches? You mentioned that it
contains all the 2080 patches.
Is that the 2080 sound bank only? Or all the 1080 patches too?
Thanks allot!

Reply

Don Solaris
September 30, 2014 at 11:01

Can’t give definitive answer to 5050 vs 5080. As of

patches, 5080 contains all 1080 and 2080 patches.

Reply

Joe F
October 13, 2014 at 15:06
Thanks for the reply.
In terms of converters if I go with the 5080,
do you know if there are any in particular that compliment

http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 10/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

it? Or doesn’t it matter?

Cheer
–J

Reply

Phil
October 2, 2014 at 12:05

Hello. This is an amazing analysis. I have bought a Roland

SC88-ST sound module with 654 sounds but it has no screen.
Is this module similar to the JV1080? And how can I get to
change the sounds? There is a cable I can buy but it ends in a parallel port,
so I would need to get another one to connect to a USB portable. Then if
there is a Roland programme, I will need to find it. It’s a little bit complicated.
Also, I could change the sounds if there is a controller keyboard that can
change sound programme numbers, but I would need to find one that does
that. I’m not too sure what to do and perhaps will take it back. I love your
sounds from the Waldorf String machine module, but the Roland sounds also
sound really great and are more practical etc. I also have the SD-50 and the
sounds are great. Are they from the XV series? Any advice? Thanks in
advance. Best regards

Reply

Don Solaris
December 2, 2014 at 21:13

I have zero konwledge about SC88. Please ask on

the forum. Link is on the top of this page.

Reply

Rafael Marfil
November 25, 2014 at 18:11

Hi! Thanks for your great article, it has been very helpful! I
have a question, does the JV-880 includes the
waveforms/patches of the U-220? I really like the sound of

http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 11/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

the U-220, particularly the drums, but I would rather buy a model that has
resonant filters. Thanks!

Reply

Don Solaris
December 2, 2014 at 21:04
It does include some of the waveforms, but not all.
Neither it sounds as good as U-220.

Reply

Llest
December 24, 2014 at 23:39

Hi!
Thanks for the article!
How easy or complicated it is to upload samples to xv-5080 nowadays? It
looks like it would be cheaper to buy a SmartMedia USB reader and a 128mb
card than a SCSI/USB adapter. Any suggestions or thoughts?
Have a nice holiday and a happy new year!

Reply

Don Solaris
February 4, 2015 at 22:56

SmartMedia USB reader all the way!

Reply

Roger
February 6, 2015 at 01:18

Hi don, great article by the way, just wondering as a jv880

owner will the jd waveform data cards work on the jv-880?

http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 12/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

Reply

Don Solaris
February 15, 2015 at 16:42

I’m not sure. Please ask on gearslutz forum.

Reply

Jd800
April 5, 2015 at 02:06

Wow,this- n- that- n -the other. Does it sound like this, or

does it sound like that?. Ok, They all basically sound identical
IMO. I personally own All of the Jv/Xp series, Including -Jd,
Rd,JP, JX, D-50/10/70, S-10. juno’s =60,106,2, and my newest baby =jupiter
50. they all are great in their own Identities @ Personalities- ask me about
my yamaha gear lol

Reply

Don Solaris
April 26, 2015 at 12:15

this-n-that is a result of endless questions that were

asked at the Gearslutz forum. I got tired of
answering them which is why i built this FAQ.

Reply

Chris
April 11, 2015 at 00:48

Wondering if you can help me out since your knowledge is so

incredibly vast regarding these instruments. I bought an
xp60 years ago. Loved the 2-300 little tunes I created on its
fantastic internal sequencer. Now I have to downsize my synths so I bought
an MC80 and a XV5080, since the MC80 reads the XP60’s disks and XV5080

http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 13/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

has the same presets as the XP60. As you likely know when you save a song
in the XP it will save the sounds and the song so that no matter what
performance patch you have up, it will instantly adjust the tracks to the
patches you used in the song. When you check the sequence under
microscope however, you can’t see any patch changes. So when I load the
same song into the MC80, it doesn’t automatically change the patches in the
performance. So I’m wondering if you know how to extract those patch
change commands from the XP’s sequencer so that the MC80 will make the
same changes when it plays back the song on the XV 5080. Make sense?

Reply

Don Solaris
April 26, 2015 at 12:12
You have to save ALL the sounds and ALL the
performances. Then when you load sequence in
MC80, just select the same performance on XV-
5080 and it should work.

Reply

Philip
April 13, 2015 at 23:59

Hello everybody!!Don, thanx for the article. I like very much

those old Roland PCM pianos, what can you advice to have-
880 or 220?? or maybe 990??Is 990 capable for those piano
sounds?

Reply

Don Solaris
April 26, 2015 at 12:10
Yeah!

Reply

http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 14/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

Harry S Morgan
June 27, 2015 at 06:25

Dear Don
First a big thanks for sharing your impressive in depth
expertise here, its been a really great source of informed
knowledge for myself (and Im sure countless other synth users).
I am contacting you because I twas hoping you wouldn’t mind assisting with
an issue that, having looked on the forum & other places, has come up
before.
My progress has been roland u-220 (yes im that old!) – jv 1080 then jd 990
now a recently purchased xv5080. Unfortunately as a (very!) amateur
musician I can’t really justify keeping both the 990 (with vintage card) and
the XV (which I plan to ge the ultimate keys card for). Like several others the
forum who have asked similar question, is there anyway I can recreate the
extra JD vintage card patches (or pretty close anyway) with the xv (with the
vintage card in the xv)
Looking through old forum threads i can see you yourself said the xv does
have the basic waveforms and some of the effects in the XV but of course
not actual access to the patches.
I can see you’ve also have created a bit of conversion guide to getting jd
patches on a jv/xv.
If i understand correctly, its been discussed that it might be possible to
recreate them by looking at the 990 patch settings in sounddriver & then
doings it manually with the xv (& them presumably saving that patch on the
memory card in he xv etc) but I thought you may have some advice on the
feasibility of this or if there is a more efficient way etc.
I hope Ive explained what Im after ok and would appreciate any assistance
you can provide.
cheers
Harry S

Reply

Don Solaris
June 30, 2015 at 21:07

My only problem (which in this particular case is

indeed a problem) is that i never, absolutely never
played or used any of the card patches. I have zero
interesrs in presets, and generally never liked them. So i do not
know their exact settings, sounds and ways they perform. But from
programming point of view, you have everything you need in your
XV to emulate these patches. The only thing you will need is cutoff
conversion table, but that i already provided.
Only patches that won’t be properly emulated are those that
employ both effects block A, delay and reverb at the same time. But
i believe this is already said in the text. There are no conversion
tools. So you will have to pick your favorites and then start
recreating them one by one which isn’t hard with side by side
http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 15/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

displays.
I sold my XV-5080, and XV-5050 which i also had so can’t do this
job. Now I only have JD-990 and JV-1080.

Reply

Harry S Morgan
July 1, 2015 at 08:25
Hi Don
Thanks for your reply, its still a help to know
that it may be possible within the
capabilities of the XV which I wasnt 100% sure of. Do you
think using soundiver would make it easier (I dont know as i
dont have the program so never used it) or it could be done
just by using the screens of the individual jd/xv.Lastly a
completely different question i see you have a sample pack
for the mc909 – i happen to have an mc808 do you know if
there is any difference in the way these handle samples
(from what Ive read id don’t think so?)
thanks for your time.

Reply

Don Solaris
July 1, 2015 at 09:17
I only edit JD from the front panel (it’s
easy and fast once get used to). I’ve
never used an editor for JD series so
can’t confirm. But i am sure it can be faster with
editor when you list all parameters at once (on a
large screen) then copy side by side. Sound Diver is
dead software, no longer supported. Beware: if you
start doing the copy process and then in the middle
(ie after one week of work) you realize some patches
simply do not sound the same – can be frustrating!
So i’d start with 3-4 most favorite patches!!!! If they
work then i would expand to another 5-6. Then i
would slowly add others, less important. Else, you
might end up in a lot of FRUSTRATION! Trust me,
been there. MC-808: never had one, so don’t know
any details.

Reply

http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 16/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name(required)

E-mail(required)

Website

Post Comment

Enter search query here...

GO

Store

Roland MC-909 Sample Pack

Roland JD-990 Patches Soundset

Yamaha AN1x Patches Soundset

Nord Wave Vintage Digitals

http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 17/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

Casio CZ-1 Patches Soundset

Free Samples and Patches

Casio CZ-230 soundset for CZ-1

Korg X5D Drums (samples)

Nord Wave Drumset (samples)

Roland TR-606 (samples)

Tech Articles & Reviews

Yamaha A4000/A5000 Review

Why using old hardware samplers?

How to upload SYX files to synthesizer via MIDI

Korg Trident MkI Demo

Waldorf Streichfett Demo (making of)

The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q.

Dynacord DRP-20 review

ASR-10 synthesizing industrial sounds

ASR-10 synthesizing an organ

Eventide H3000 as a formant synth

Andromeda A6 sound improvement

http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 18/19
7/16/2015 The ultimate Roland JV, JD, XV F.A.Q. | donsolaris.com

Deep FM bass on Roland JD/JV/XV series

How to achieve PWM on Roland’s SuperJV/JD/XP series

Roland JD-800 emulation on XV synthesizers

Roland JD-990 Resource Centre

Roland JD-800 Resource Centre

Synthesis types

Synthesizer basics

Enter search query here...

GO

© All rights reserved.

All content copyright by Don Solaris unless otherwise noted.

http://www.donsolaris.com/?p=404 19/19