Sie sind auf Seite 1von 12

WHITE PAPER

Redefining ETRM
Redefining ETRM A ComTechAdvisory Whitepaper

INTRODUCTION
In the world of E/CTRM software much is changing and at a fair pace. Driven by a plethora
of new business needs, massive shifts in technology, and changes in software procurement
behavior, it is a software category that is ripe for a true paradigm shift. In a paper written a few
years ago, Commodity Technology Advisory (ComTech) outlined a potential solution to some
of the issues that have plagued buyers of E/CTRM software for decades1. In that paper, the
authors proposed a different approach to architecting E/CTRM solutions – that is creating an
ecosystem of software capabilities rather than relying on the monolithic applications that have,
or invariably will, become increasingly expensive and difficult to deploy, update and maintain.
ComTech noted that such an approach was both technically feasible given the advent of cloud
technologies and desirable as it helped solve the myriad of business issues buyers face today.
Since then, business trends have continued to evolve in directions around data management,
digitalization and automation, and collaboration. More recently, lockdowns and the need for
business continuity have only served to push the envelope faster and further.

As ComTech stated at that time “Throughout, the CTRM solution that addresses all commodities
twenty-year history of the software category, the and markets – is almost certainly impossible to
perceived “Holy Grail” has often been to develop a commercially achieve and, frankly, is ultimately probably
singular comprehensive solution - one that covers all (or not desirable. Rather, the most reasonable approach is
at least the most common) commodities, geographies, an architectural approach – one that combines specific
supply chains, and assets. Unfortunately, experience has modules or individual products that can address the
proven such a solution to be more or less impossible to specific needs of an individual company and the market
commercially achieve and support - and yet, there is still or markets in which they operate. It is our thesis that
a lingering sense in some corners of the market that this CTRM/Commodity Management is, and should be, an
remains the ultimate goal. Though many lessons have architecture first and foremost - one in which specific
undoubtedly been learned as some vendors (and a few technologies and solutions are deployed to solve the
market participants who invested in bespoke solutions) litany of complex problems faced by today’s market
tried to build the singular solution that could address any participants.” Since that writing, the authors’ assessment
prospect’s needs, ComTech now believes that the “Holy has not changed.
Grail” - a singular, monolithic Commodity Management/

1. https://www.ctrmcenter.com/publications/white-papers/ctrmcm-architecture-approach-20-year-old-condundrum/
Redefining ETRM A ComTechAdvisory Whitepaper

THE PAST
Until relatively recently, E/CTRM solutions were built more or less as an after the fact recording
system to help manage trade transactions. They were often built by vendors that needed a stream
of new customers and implementations to keep them afloat relying on traditional perpetual
license and support fees for their security. Their solutions were built to be highly configurable
to cater for as many of the broad requirements across the market as possible, since the vendor
needed more and more sales to keep things going. Each implementation necessarily involved
enhancements that may or may not be rolled into the core product and those implementations
could be very long and very expensive. Many implementations failed entirely or were concluded
on a suboptimal basis not truly delivering the anticipated business benefit.

Once users made a product selection they were pieces of software would break the software in two or
essentially ‘trapped’ into a single vendor environment more other places. Replacement of the solution was
totally dependent upon that vendor for timely also extremely difficult, expensive and risky and many
enhancements and upgrades to keep pace with rapid users feel trapped as a result.
industry change. The vendor was also trapped to some
extent in a world where the focus was on winning From time to time, the solution provider would be
the next sale rather than optimally serving existing acquired by another vendor in the space seeking greater
customers’ needs. The optimal outcome for all parties market share to satisfy its investors or stakeholders.
was when new customer needs aligned with broader Often, this acquisition would spell the death knell for the
industry requirements, though given each companies’ application as the vendor desired the users to migrate
mix of assets, strategies and business processes, this to another product – perhaps one they already rejected
was a rare occurrence. Upgrades were also expensive during the selection process or, the staff who knew
and slow to conclude. Insufficient vendor testing often the solution gradually left the acquiring vendor leaving
resulted in the customer testing more rigorously than behind insufficient product knowledge to adequately
would be considered usual before taking an upgrade support the product. Very rarely was the acquisition
and, quite often changes to one area of these complex good news for the users.

© Commodity Technology Advisory LLC, 2020, All Rights Reserved. 3


Redefining ETRM A ComTechAdvisory Whitepaper

CHANGE, CHANGE AND MORE CHANGE


Constant business change has been ‘par for the course’ in commodities. Increasing regulatory
oversights, innovation of business models, and the need to rapidly morph and evolve with all
sorts of business drivers including,
• a switch to renewable generation and in buyer behaviors to cater for environmental and social
issues,
• a decline in trading margins,
• new markets, new instruments and new types of contract including the rapid emergence of
intraday trading,
• new types of trade finance,
• new regulations and reporting requirements, and so on.

These have all combined to mean that most trading easily consumable formats has been paramount.
or commodity-related businesses must be much more Automation has also become necessary to reduce
agile with an ability to adapt and change or die. costs and increase efficiencies, as has ways to optimize
assets – often involving AI and ML. However, the move
In recent years, significant geopolitical issues have also to the cloud for much more scalability and lower costs
plagued the commodities industry impacting supply has been one of the major shifts of the last few years
chains and, finally in the spring of 2020, lockdowns – one accentuated by digitalization and the need for
and home office placed the focus squarely on business business continuity. Increasingly, E/CTRM software
continuity. In European power and gas, change has been is being delivered as software as a service where
driven by a shift to renewables primarily making intra- fees are charged for usage on a regular basis rather
day trading more important, creating huge amounts than an up-front perpetual license. Similarly, the use
of data and driving a need for near real-time data and of public cloud is enhancing scalability and reliability
information. while helping to decrease costs. Even in cases of older,
monolithic solutions, the adoption of rental or service
Technology has also moved fast. In an era where big level agreements is transforming payment from upfront
data and data analysis is key, the move towards more licensing to usage payments.
real-time presentation of information in readily and

© Commodity Technology Advisory LLC, 2020, All Rights Reserved. 4


Redefining ETRM A ComTechAdvisory Whitepaper

TOWARDS ECOSYSTEMS
Since the publication of the ComTech ecosystem whitepaper1, the market has seen some
architectural changes emerge in E/CTRM software where more discrete applications are delivered
along with APIs. As the authors said at that time “After 20-years of research and analysis of what
are deeply heterogeneous markets that evolve and adapt very rapidly in an almost punctuated
equilibrium model, ComTech believes that CTRM/CM is best thought of as an Architecture or
ecosystem of commercial and potentially homegrown solutions as described above. We need to
be able to get to the point where buyers can solve the problem through a buy and build approach
within the context of an Architecture (or ecosystem).”

This approach has also been proposed as a way to time to deliver incremental updates to a smaller and
gradually migrate away from large monolithic solutions more discrete parcel of code meaning users get
with a huge sunk investment - essentially replacing their needs met sooner,
areas of functionality with more agile applications and 3. Reduced testing – in the old world of monolithic
migrating to more of an ecosystem. By breaking down E/CTRM users always need to rigorously test
monoliths of functionality into more discrete applications the entire E/CTRM, solution, and this is time
that deliver vertical functionality or horizontal features consuming, costly and often results in the discovery
like workflow and approval, document management of other errors that need to be fixed (see 1 above).
and so on, the well-known issues around E/CTRM With a smaller application of more limited functional
software can be more easily tackled. Rather than trying scope it is simply faster, less costly and easier to
to solve the problem of complexity with hugely complex test,
and highly configurable monolithic applications, the 4. Improved performance and scaling – Users often
solution can be delivered as discrete applications and experience performance issues in key areas of their
API’s in an ecosystem. software like reporting or complex calculations and
these are often run overnight as batch jobs. Any
The benefits of using more discrete applications are error means the batch job fails and so the results are
numerous and include, unavailable. By reducing and isolating functionality
1. Easier maintenance – there is less code to maintain and deploying them in the cloud, there is more
and any changes will have fewer impacts on other flexibility of tuning hardware for performance and
parts of the application versus the monolithic scalability as needed. This also means that it is less
approach where a change in one part of the costly to run,
application can result in a ripple of impact across a 5. Reduced cost – all of the above adds up to less
large amount of code, cost than maintaining, supporting and working with
2. Increased speed of delivery – it simply takes less a large, complex monolithic solution.
© Commodity Technology Advisory LLC, 2020, All Rights Reserved. 5
Redefining ETRM A ComTechAdvisory Whitepaper

With the recent issues around business continuity as solutions in the cloud. Without the collaboration and
a result of lockdowns, many more firms have looked ease of communication that can take place in an office
at or migrated to the cloud for the increased business environment, workflow and process control becomes
flexibility that it can provide. In the process, they have increasingly important to ensure that work gets done
recognized more acutely that their current solution is and people collaborate on a timely basis. We see
complex, unwieldy and expensive to run and maintain. workflow and similar horizontal functions, like document
Even after the lockdowns are over, we expect more management for example, as key components in the
people to work from home or remote environments and future ecosystems.
we see this also as a key driver in moving to ecosystem

BREAKING THE PARADIGM


While ComTech has seen a movement towards more of an ecosystem approach in recent years,
there continues to be a number of other characteristics of the current paradigm that should also
change.

These include the following, applications for more strategic functions if they so
• Vendor dependency – many users are tied into a desire.
particular vendor and dependent upon it for their • Collaboration – As mentioned above, collaboration
E/CTRM solution. If that vendor runs into financial is important both between different parts of the
troubles, is acquired by another vendor, is more same business as well as with partners, customers
focused on winning new business to maintain its and stakeholders. Using tools such as workflow and
revenues, or simply starts to behave in a manner that automation, collaboration can be managed, tracked
the buyer doesn’t appreciate, there isn’t much that and errors and omissions reduced. ComTech
can be done. The customer has little leverage and expects that tools to promote collaboration as well
could be exposed to increasing costs and difficulties. as add controls will be easier to deploy within an
By using an ecosystem approach ideally, the buyer ecosystem approach.
has vendor choice, and can both utilize applications • Technology adoption – The ecosystem approach and
from different vendors to minimize risk as well as segregation of functionality will likely make it easier
switch vendors and solutions more quickly and cost to adopt new technologies such as automation, AI,
effectively. They can more easily use commercial ML and blockchain in the future.
applications for basic functionality and homegrown

© Commodity Technology Advisory LLC, 2020, All Rights Reserved. 6


Redefining ETRM A ComTechAdvisory Whitepaper

TIME FOR CHANGE


The combination of business drivers and technologies is set to fundamentally change a great
deal in the world of commodities and certainly within the E/CTRM software category.

The need to increase efficiencies, optimize assets, these changes are emerging with many innovative new
increase business agility and keep costs down are made business models and approaches to attempt to solve
potentially feasible by adopting newer technologies the problem. One of which has been announced by
like cloud, AI, ML, better programming languages, start-up Previse Systems.
in memory databases and much more. Evidence of

PREVISE SYSTEMS
Founded by a group of veterans in the industry who have directly experienced all aspects of the
issues associated with monolithic E/CTRM software and the old delivery paradigm, Previse has
brought something new and innovative to European energy markets.

Having seen and worked in ETRM where solutions are third-parties can offer incremental and purpose-
often expensive, difficult and costly to implement, on built functionality that can easily be added to the
client/server or older technologies, and always need customers’ ecosystem and provides choice and
to be customized to some degree from vendors that competitive prices.
are constrained by poor financing or high debt, it has
rethought the entire approach and separated out the
ETRM into three distinct elements;
1. A user-owned common trade repository
(ChorusLink) where each trade is stored and
accessible by all parties to the trade in a fast and
secure environment,
2. A high-performance position application (Coral)
that delivers the ability to quickly and easily
visualize, and process large volumes of data, and Users co-own the trade repository – ChorusLink –
3. An app store-like platform (Coral Ecosystem) where where trades can be captured just once and managed

© Commodity Technology Advisory LLC, 2020, All Rights Reserved. 7


Redefining ETRM A ComTechAdvisory Whitepaper

as a single data object. Counterparties can validate the Previse’s Coral application combines information
trade there reducing to a minimum a lot of often very from ChorusLink, internal trades and production/
manual reconciliations and agreements on trades. By consumption forecasts, and market prices providing
joining the ChorusLink consortium, trade reconciliation, input for business intelligence and risk management.
settlement and regulatory reporting becomes even
easier. Using an industry standard trade repository like Previse Systems will
ChorusLink also ensures that users retain control over become the ‘Apple’ of
their data as opposed to having it under the control of the ETRM space allowing
a vendor and stored in a standard format rather than a
vendor-proprietary format. Each user company is a part
the delivery of a full and
owner of the repository that will initially utilize Previse complete product using an
for maintenance and support but which, after a quorum ecosystem of applications
has been reached, can dictate its own directions and and API’s
future. In this model the users own their data and where Jonas Nihøj, Director of Energy Trading & PPA
it is stored.
Previse also desires to create an ecosystem of low cost
Position management of both physical and financial applications that can be quickly and easily adopted
transactions is a key aspect of trading and it requires by users via an app store marketplace offering public
both speed of performance and to be near real-time and private applications. By publishing API’s and
to inform decisions. It is also where major controls other guidelines, third-parties including other vendors,
are placed in terms of various limits and so on. consulting companies and even the users themselves,
Redefining ETRM A ComTechAdvisory Whitepaper

can add cost effective applications to the app store but has instead chosen to focus on delivering a ‘best
and offer them via subscription thus ensuring a healthy in class’ position keeping application with Coral. It has
variety of applications from various sellers. Previse sees then broken out the database as a separate horizontal
this as opening up a development ecosystem around its component and offered it in a collaborative manner
Coral application and on top of the ChorusLink database allowing all parties to gain deep efficiencies in the trade
and states “that 99% of the functionality available in its confirmation area to start with - but with potential to
UI is available from API’s that can be called.” address other areas in the future. Finally, by publishing
clear API’s and providing an app store infrastructure,
The entire idea is unique it allows others to develop vertical and horizontal
and will reduce the costs applications within a defined ecosystem.
of ETRM substantially
The benefits of this approach are many and include;
while providing an enabling • Speed of delivery is improved meaning that rapid
ecosystem to support industry change can be reacted to innovatively and
innovation rapidly,
Jonas Nihøj, Director of Energy Trading & PPA • Lower cost – in the Software as a Service model,
costs are based on usage and all-inclusive; however,
This approach represents a real shift to the paradigm the App Store concept creates a competitive market
in that the vendor is not attempting to build everything that keeps prices down as well,
for everyone (the ‘all singing, all dancing’ application) • The entire approach allows for collaboration either
Redefining ETRM A ComTechAdvisory Whitepaper

via the App Store or as a result of the ChorusLink • The inevitable customizations that so often plague
ownership and participation model. Collaboration in the traditional model and cause so many issues in
that sense includes an end to tedious, error prone delivery can now be performed vis specific private
manual processes, apps in the App store meaning that standard
• By breaking down the problem into smaller, bite- processes and functionality can be supplied with
sized chunks, functionality can be delivered faster less effort and therefore lower cost.
and cheaper with less testing and more ability to
tune performance and scalability, There are other benefits, of course, and with adoption,
• Upgrades are delivered continuously as opposed to the approach will offer further benefits into the future. It
via specific projects that can be risky and require will also change the paradigm of ETRM forever.
significant efforts in testing,

© Commodity Technology Advisory LLC, 2020, All Rights Reserved. 10


ABOUT PREVISE SYSTEMS

Previse Systems develops innovative IT solutions for have been showing severe systemic shortcomings
energy trading and related processes based on the to meeting these objectives in a satisfactory way,
latest technology. exacerbated in recent years by rapidly evolving markets.

As a start-up, we combine creativity, out of the box Previse Systems proposes a new paradigm for energy
thinking and disruptive concepts with a solid vision on trading software to address these shortcomings.
how we can reshape IT infrastructure for energy trading
companies to increase intuitiveness, efficiency and For more information, please visit
scalability. www.previsesystems.com

Previse Systems believes that the objectives of in-


formation technology primarily consist in suporting bu-
siness operations in the best possible way and at the
lowest possible cost.

Traditional approaches at energy trading companies

ABOUT CHORUSLINK
At ChorusLink, our purpose is to spearhead a change of trade data storage by introducing the common trade
paradigm for energy trading software. We think ongoing repository. Moving to a single data object per trade
trends in energy markets and technology platforms one and a standardized format in a highly performant trade
step further and follow the vision of a common platform repository enables you to facilitate automation and
for energy trading data. This conceptual quantum leap streamlined processes at significantly lover costs.
facilitates process efficiencies, optimises investment
returns on IT spending and fosters future infrastructure For more information, visit www.choruslink.ch.
adaptability on an unprecedented level.

ChorusLink was founded by Previse Systems as the


cornerstone of a radical re-design of the software
function in energy trading and risk management
(ETRM).

ChorusLink redefines the mechanics of energy


ABOUT
Commodity
Technology
Advisory
LLC
Commodity Technology Advisory is the leading analyst organization covering the ETRM and
CTRM markets. We provide the invaluable insights into the issues and trends affecting the
users and providers of the technologies that are crucial for success in the constantly evolving
global commodities markets.

Patrick Reames and Gary Vasey head our team, whose combined 60-plus years in the energy
and commodities markets, provides depth of understanding of the market and its issues that is
unmatched and unrivaled by any analyst group.

For more information, please visit:


www.comtechadvisory.com
ComTech Advisory also hosts the CTRMCenter, your online portal with news and views about
commodity markets and technology as well as a comprehensive online directory of software
and services providers.
Please visit the CTRMCenter at:
www.ctrmcenter.com

19901 Southwest Freeway


Sugar Land TX 77479
+1 281 207 5412

Prague, Czech Republic


+420 775 718 112

ComTechAdvisory.com
Email: info@comtechadvisory.com

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen