Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/323682107

Pipes, R. B., and Pagano, N. J., "Interlaminar Stresses in Composite Laminates -


An Approximate Elasticity Solution," Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 41, No.
3, (1974), pp. 668-...

Article · March 2018

CITATIONS READS
0 356

1 author:

Byron Pipes
Purdue University
277 PUBLICATIONS   7,437 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Cure-History Dependence of the Residual Deformation in a Thermosetting Laminate View project

Performance Analysis of Prepreg Platelet Molded Composites View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Byron Pipes on 16 March 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


R. B. Pipes1 Interlaminar Stresses in Composite
University of Delaware,
Newark, Del.
Laminates-An Approximate
N. J. Pagano
Air Force Materials Laboratory,
Nonmetalllc Materials Division,
Elasticity Solution
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio

An approximate elasticity solution is developed for the response of the finite-width,


angle-ply composite laminate under uniform axial strain. The solution yields compo-
nents of the displacement vector, strain tensor, and stress tensor in the form of sinusoi-
dal-hyperbolic series. Results of the approximate solution are compared to numerical so-
lutions of the exact equations for four-layer, symmetric laminate geometries. The nature
of the boundary disturbance in the eight-layer laminate is also examined by the approxi-
mate solution.

Introduction Free Edge

The elastic response of the finite-width laminate consisting of


layers of an anisotropic material has been the subject of several
recent investigations [1-8]. 2 These studies have been motivated
by a requirement to develop an understanding of the mechanisms
of interlaminar load transfer in a fiber-reinforced composite ma-
terial. The majority of investigators have utilized numerical tech-
niques since the general (three-dimensional) solution of the equa-
tions of elasticity for a layered, anisotropic medium, presents a
formidable task. In an earlier paper [1] the authors examined the
finite-width laminate, Fig. 1, subjected to uniform axial strain
and obtained numerical solutions of the displacement-equilibrium
equations by finite-difference techniques. Due to the ineconomy
of the numerical solution methods, only the most simple laminate
geometries could be examined earlier. Therefore, only by devel-
oping more economical numerical solution techniques or approxi-
mate elasticity solutions will it be possible to examine the com-
plex laminate geometries of interest. The latter approach was un-
LAMINATE GEOMETRY
dertaken by the authors, and in the present work we develop an
approximate solution to the equations of elasticity which yields Fig. 1 Boundary-value problem
the components of the displacement vector, strain tensor, and
stress tensor in the form of sinusoidal-hyperbolic series for an im-
solutions of the exact equations for laminate geometries of four
portant class of composite bodies; namely, angle-ply laminates.
layers. Next, the approximate solution is extended to consider-
Results of the approximate solutions are compared to numerical
ation of the laminate geometry of eight layers and differences in
the elastic response of the eight and four-layer laminates are
studied.
1
Formerly, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pa. Theoretical Development
2
Numbers in brackets designate References at end of paper.
The displacement-equilibrium equations for an anisotropic
Presented at the Seventh U. S. National Congress of Applied Mechanics,
University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo., June 3-7, 1974. elastic medium possessing a single plane of elastic symmetry 3 and
Discussion on this paper should be addressed to the Editorial Depart- subjected to uniform axial extension [1] are given by
ment, ASME, United Engineering Center, 345 East 47th Street, New York,
N. Y. 10017, and will be accepted until November 20, 1974. Discussion re- 3
ceived after this date will be returned. Manuscript received by ASME In this case, the plane of elastic symmetry coincides with the plane of
Applied Mechanics Division, September, 1973; final revision, March, 1974. lamination.

668 / SEPTEMBER 1974 Copyright © 1974 by ASME Transactions of the ASME

Downloaded From: http://appliedmechanics.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 03/15/2018 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


cssu,yy + c„u,„ + clsv,„ + cuv,„ Displacements

+ (C 3e + C„)W,„ = 0 (la) V Me0y + PU (5fe)


CttU,„ + CUU,„ + CnV,„ + CuV,ee
w 0 e o * + ip f U,s(y,l-)dl- (5Z)
+ (C 23 + Cu)W,ys = 0 (16)

(C 45 + C%)U,ye + (C 44 + C „ ) V 1 M , + CUW,„ where the constants are defined as follows:


+ C33^,„ = 0 (lc) 2C
+ 26C36C33 £33^26 C22C36
(6a)
^ 5 6 ^ 2 2 ^ 3 3 ~~ ^23 )
Where the elastic constants, Ctj, are functions of the lamina
orthotropic material properties and fiber orientation of. each ^GflijClqCDn
V = C, -12l^13'-,23 — ^22 13 — ^•'W-'tt
33^1
layer. In addition, it may be shown that C;6(0) = -Ctt(-0) (i = (66)
- C
1-3). Numerical solutions of the governing equations have been C22C33 23
obtained recently employing the finite-difference techniques [1, r | C
12C23C36 + C13C23 C 26 ~ C ^ C j !3C25 _ " C13|C2^CR6
5
2]. The class of problems investigated in reference [1] was re- 0 _ OJO i 2
stricted to four-layer, symmetric angle-ply laminates, while the C'22^33 - -c
response of the general six-layer symmetric laminate was investi- (6c)
gated in reference [8]. Results of the former analysis revealed that
only three of the six stress components played significant roles in 13 = C 55 a (6d)
the elastic response of the angle-ply* laminate. On the basis of
C C
these results two of the three remaining stress components will be ,, 13^23 ~ Cl2 23
assumed to vanish in the following development: ~ 2 »«)
^22^33 - C 2 3

S = C « e 0 + C M V , , + CnW,e + CltU,, = 0 (2a) p '"'36^23 - C2SCM


(6/)
-
a, = C 1 3 e 0 + C M V , „ + CggW,, + C3eU,y = 0 (2ft) C22C33 C23
C
A 12C23 ~ C
13C22
We shall only consider materials for which the stiffness coefficient (6ff)
C22C23 - C23
C45 vanishes (like the material studied in [1]).
-
j, ^26^23 C 3 6 C22
(6/!)
C45 =0 (3)
C22C23 ~" ^
The physical justification for this assumption is based primarily 2£ 0 wfe 0 5a 1 / 2
upon the knowledge that for contemporary fiber-reinforced mate- (60
rials C45 is small relative to the other Cy. The assumptions de-
scribed in equations (2) and (3) combined with the governing
equations result in a transformation of equation (la) from a par- The problem to be considered will be the m-layer symmetric lam-
tial differential equation in three variables to one in a single vari- inate. By symmetry we can treat one-half of the laminate. The
able. mixed boundary conditions are given as follows:

<*V.m +U,„ = 0 (4) Txy(b,z) = 0 (7a)

The stress, strain, and displacement components may now be ex- 17(0, z) = 0 (76)
pressed in terms of the single variable, U.
(7c)
Stresses •. {y. ? ) = °
(5 a) .( y ,^-) = o (7d)
Txy = 6€ 0 + PU, (56)
The boundary conditions may now be expressed in terms of the
(5 c) dependent variable, U, by combining equations (5) and (7).
T„ = Cu[pU,M + i> r U,„(y,£)dt] (5d)
J0 U,y(b,z) = 6£0//3 (+6)
(8 a)
Strains
U,y(6, z) = - 5€0//3 (-0)

(5e) U(0, z) = 0 (86)

e , = <pe0 + 4>u
(5/)

(5g)
M y, V) =0 (8c)

U„(y,^>) =0 (8rf)
Yxy, = U, y (5k)

r« = u,., (50 The boundary condition (8a) is a piecewise continuous function of


• y. = PU,, + tf f* U,„(y,£)dt 2 and hence may be represented by a Fourier series. Clearly, the
(5j)
•J i) stacking sequence enters the problem through the Fourier repre-
sentation of the boundary condition (8a). Since the boundary
* Laminates consisting of equal numbers of layers of +8 and —8 fiber ori- conditions given in (8) are separable, the method of separation of
entation. variables' may be utilized in determining solutions of the govern-

Journal of Applied Mechanics SEPTEMBER 1974 / 669

Downloaded From: http://appliedmechanics.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 03/15/2018 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


z
8.01203.
U, z (b-h 0 ,h 0 l
7.01177.
6.01152.
5.0(127.
/ U.z'o.ho)
4.0(101. 0.75

: 3.0 176.

_^S : 2.0 (50.


1.0 125.
0.0
0.00 0.25 0.50
y/b
0.75 1.00
•v J^R^HIsd ""•
1 457-451 s
b-8h0
U,j- U,z(1000 Terms)
o Finite - Diff. Solution
— • Approximate Sol.

0.25
Fig. 2 Surface axial displacement distribution at z/h0 = 2.0
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Number of Terms

Fig. 4 Divergence of a U,z at the free-edge

Fig. 2 where displacement results at the surface z/ho = 2 are

id compared to the finite-difference solution. Similar results were


obtained for U,y and U,z throughout. Hence, it must be conclud-
ed that the analytic solution yields an accurate representation of
<
/1^1.626 o
1.50(10.341^" the stress field for the boundary-value problem considered. The
interlaminar shear stress distribution at the interface z/h0 = 1.0
I45/-45I S /
is shown in Fig. 3 for the four-layer, finite-width laminate with b
- 1.00 (6.i
b = 8h 0 / = 8ho- The finite-difference and approximate solutions differ only
- Approximate Sol. p
near the free-edge, where the numerical solution achieves a finite
o Finite - Diff. Solution / value, while the approximate solution appears to grow without
bound. The existence of a singularity in the stress field at this
point was postulated in reference [1]. Therefore, the behavior of
- C — - O — O B *
0.25 0.50 the Fourier representation of U,z was examined both at the free-
y/b edge (y = b) and* an interior point very near the free-edge (y =
Fig. 3 Interlaminar shear stress distribution at z/h0 = 1.0 b-ho). These results are shown in Fig. 4 where UiZ at the interior
point is shown to converge in less than 25 terms, while UtZ at the
free-edge does not appear to have copverged after 1000 terms. The
divergent character of U,z (b,hQ) may be evidence of the presence
of a singularity at the point (b,hg) as postulated in reference [1].
However, it should be noted that the Fourier representation of
ing equations within each layer. Examination of the coefficient,
Uty at (b,ho) converges to its mean value of zero rather than ±
a(8) and the d6(S) reveals that
5e0//3. Hence, the divergence of Ua (b,h0) may be a result of the
a(+6) = a(-t (9) anomaly in the Fourier series representations of U,y at the point
(b.ho)-
Hence, the governing equation is identical in each layer. Solution The results which have been presented reveal that the approxi-
of the governing equations by the method of separation of vari- mate solution developed here yields results which agree very well
ables yields the displacement function, U of the following form: with numerical solutions of the exact equations of elasticity. It is,
2knir i however, informative to investigate the source of the approxima-
„/2 [( - i f sin s i n fe vy
tion in the solution. This objective may be achieved by examining
the second and third equilibrium equations for a medium subject-
n=l 6=1
c o s fcyS
ed to "uniform axial extension" [1].
(10)
where
2nir/mhr.a 1/2 (11«)

The strain and displacement fields are given by substituting (10) (116)
into (5).
Combining equations (2) and (11) reveals that the only admissi-
Examination of the Solution ble solution for the stress component ryz is
The accuracy of the approximate solution may be considered
by comparing results with the numerical (finite-difference) solu-
tions of the exact equations presented in reference [1]. Material T„„ = 0 (12)
properties utilized in this study are given as follows:
However, the solution for ryz given in equation (5) vanishes only
EX1 = 20.0 x 106 psi (137.9 GPa) when
E22 =£33 = 2.1 X 106 psi (14.5 GPa)
G12 = G13 = G 23 = 0.85 x 106 psi (5.9 GPa) p - ip/a = 0 (13)
V12 = V1S = V23 = 0 . 2 1

The accuracy of the analytic solution for U is demonstrated in Since equation (13) cannot be proven to hold, in general, the

670 / SEPTEMBER 1974 Transactions of the ASME

Downloaded From: http://appliedmechanics.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 03/15/2018 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


-4.0

1.00 16.!
(~8.3) (-5.5) (-2. (5.5) (8.3)
-1.2 -0.8 -0.4 o 0.8 1.2
_i i i

T 6 psi (GPal
xz' x

Fig. 5 Influence of stacking sequence upon the interlaminar shear


stress

source of the approximation is determined to be.the violation of


equilibrium in the y and z-directions. Examination of the compa-
tibility equations reveals that the solution satisfies each of the six Fig. 6 Eight-layer interlaminar shear stress distribution aty/b = 1.0
equations of compatibility.

Multilayer Problem
Examination of the approximate solution has revealed that it
accurately predicts the behavior of the interlaminar shear stress,
Txz for symmetric, angle-ply laminates of finite width. Since the
finite-difference solution technique employed in reference [1] lim-
ited the investigation to consideration of laminate geometries
which consisted of no more than four layers, it is appropriate to
utilize the approximate solution to examine the multilayer prob-
lem. Previous results presented in reference [1] revealed the inter-
laminar stress to be confined to a boundary layer at the free-edge
of the laminate. In addition, the plane of maximum shear stress,
Txz was shown to coincide with the interface between +45 and
- 4 5 deg layers, while TXZ was observed to vanish at the +45 deg/
+45 deg interface, owing to symmetry conditions. Hence, it was
not possible to investigate the load transfer mechanisms of the
general symmetric angle-ply laminate. Nor was it possible to de-
termine the dependency of the boundary layer width upon the
laminate dimensions. Two such relations might be postulated as
-8.0 -6.0 -4.0 -2.0 0 2.0 4.0 6.0
follows: (-203.2) (-152.4) (-101.6) (-50.8) ,50 8)
i (101.6) (152.4) (203.2)
U ( b , z l / « „ x 10 in ( « m )
1 The boundary-layer width is a function of the layer thick-
ness, ho- Fig?7 Eight-layer axial displacement distribution at y/b = 1.0

2 The boundary-layer width is a function of the laminate


thickness, h.
Clearly, there exists adequate motivation for utilization of the
approximate solution in investigating the response of the multi- When this result is compared to that for the four-layer laminate
layer problem. presented in [1] one major difference between the two distribu-
The multilayer problem chosen for investigation was the eight- tions is observed. While the response in the region - 1 . 0 < z//i 0 <
layer, angle-ply laminate of ±45 deg fiber orientation. The influ- 1.0 is identical for the eight and four-layer laminates. The re-
ence of stacking sequence of the eight-layer laminate upon the in- sponse in the regions z/ho > 1.0 is significantly different. This re-
terlaminar shear stress, TXZ is shown in Fig. 5. In stacking se- sult indicates that the interlaminar stress distribution for the
quence A, layers of the same orientation are placed in adjacent four-layer problem is not sufficient for prediction of the behavior
positions, while layers are totally interspersed in stacking se- of the multilayer problem.
quence B. The eight-layer stacking sequence A is identical to a The axial displacement distribution is shown in Fig. 7 for the
four-layer laminate of layer thickness twice that of the eight-layer eight-layer problem. The eight-layer axial displacement distribu-
laminate. Hence, the results presented in Fig. 5 reveal the influ- tion shown in Fig. 7 exhibits a complex functional form, where
ence of stacking sequence upon the interlaminar shear stress of the maximum displacement occurs at the surfaces z/h0 = ±4.0
the interface between the +45 deg and - 4 5 deg layers. Clearly, and the midplane z/h0 - 0.0; and a near sinusoidal function of
the postulated singularity in the solution of the four-layer lami- smaller amplitude exists in the region ±1.0 < z/ho < ±3.0.
nate, appears to be present at the free-edge of the eight-layer The influence of laminate geometry, ho/h, upon the boundary-
laminate as well. This behavior is analogous to variations in the layer thickness is shown in Fig. 8. The axial distribution at the
crack-tip stress distribution of linear elastic fracture mechanics laminate surface z/h = 0.5 for the three laminates [45/-45] s , [45/
produced by changes in the magnitude of the stress-intensity fac- -45/45/-45] s and [45/-45/45/-45/45/-45/45/-45] s are shown. These
tor. results clearly indicate that the boundary-layer thickness is very
The distribution of the interlaminar shear stress through the nearly identical to the laminate thickness in each case consid-
laminate thickness is shown in Fig. 6 for stacking sequence B. ered.

Journal of Applied Mechanics SEPTEMBER 1974 / 671

Downloaded From: http://appliedmechanics.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/ on 03/15/2018 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use


2 114(355.6) layer, within which the interlaminar load transfer is restricted,
has been shown to be a constant for layers of identical fiber orien-
tation but varying stacking sequence. The boundary-layer thick-
ness was found to be equal to the laminate thickness for the 45
deg configuration.

References
1 Pipes, R. B., and Pagano, N. J., "Interlaminar Stresses in Composite
Laminates Under Uniform Axial Extension," Journal of Composite Materi-
als, Vol. 4,1970, p. 538.
2 Puppo, A. H., and Evensen, H. A., "Interlaminar Shear in Laminated
Composites Under Generalized Plane Stress," Journal of Composite Mate-
riais, Vol.4, 1970, p. 204.
3 Pagano, N. J., and Pipes, R. B., "Influence of Stacking Sequence on
Laminate Strength," Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 5, 1971, p.51.
4 Isakson, G., and Levy, A., "Finite-Element Analysis of Interlaminar
i , 1— 1 r: ? —•—• r—- , i o Shear in Fiberous Composites," Journal of Composite Materials Vol. 5,
20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
1971, p. 273.
fJh0
5 Rybicki, E. F., "Approximate Three-Dimensional Solutions for Sym-
Fig. 8 Influence of laminate thickness upon boundary-layer width metric Laminates Under In-Plane Loading," Journal of Composite Materi-
als, Vol. 5,1971, p. 354.
Conclusions 6 Whitney, J. M., "Free-Edge Effects in the Characterization of Com-
posite Materials," Analysis of the Test Methods for High Modulus Fibers
In summary, we have presented an approximate elasticity solu- and Composites, ASTM STP521,1973.
tion for the response of the "m" layer, symmetric angle-ply lami- 7 Oplinger, D. W., "Edge Effects in Angle-Ply Composite," AMMRC
nate under uniform axial strain. The results of the approximate TR 71-62, Army Materials and Mechanics Research Center, Watertown,
solution exhibit excellent agreement with numerical solutions of Mass., 1971.
8 Pipes, R. B., "Solution of Certain Problems in the Theory of Elastici-
the exact equations. The source of approximation is shown to be a ty for Laminated Anisotropic Systems," PhD dissertation, University of
violation of equilibrium in the y and z-directions. The boundary Texas of Arlington, Mar. 1972.

672 / SEPTEMBER 1974 Transactions of the ASME

DownloadedViewFrom:
publicationhttp://appliedmechanics.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/
stats on 03/15/2018 Terms of Use: http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen