Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
“And afterward I will pour out my spirit on all people. Your sons
and daughters will prophesy, your old men will dream dreams, your
young will see visions.” (Joel 2:28)
By
ZEESHAN SADIQ
THIRD YEAR STUDENT
GUJRANWALA THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
GUJRANWALA, PAKISTAN
Acknowledgements
Coming to the seminary and writing thesis could never have been possible, if God would not have
called me to be His minister. I praise God for all His mercies that He enabled me to join seminary in a
critical situation.
At this particular time I want to express my sincere and immeasurable gratitude to my venerable
teacher and adviser Professor Paul Burgess, who has been a great source of encouragement and
learning, especially in English language. He broadened my sense of thinking and enabled me to
complete this thesis on a very controversial issue. I cannot ignore the help of Dr. Aslam Ziai who not
only encouraged me to write a thesis on the subject of the gift of prophecy but also provided books, and
has been a source inspiration as far my writing skills are concerned.
I am very grateful to Principal Dr. Arthur James who not only taught me but defended my case for
staying in this seminary. I am obliged to Professor Marcus Frauchiger for providing me up-to date
information from internet sources. This was a great help to me. I am very thankful to Dr. Maqsood
Kamal, who enriched my theological understanding. I am also grateful to Professor Mrs. Nosheen
Khan, Dr. Eddy Lanze and Rev. Merl W. Enniger for their moral and educational support. I am really
thankful for the prayers of my all seminary fellows that energized me for accomplishing this herculean
task.
I wish to express my appreciation to Elder Naseem Akhtar for the assistance in computerization and
printing this thesis.
I also want to extend my special thanks to Dr. Luke Gweon and his wife for their financial support and
prayers during seminary, even in uncongenial circumstances. I am very much pleased by the persistent
guidance of my class fellows Babar and Shagufta. And finally I want to give thanks to my Parents for
their prayers, support and affection that led me through this hard process steadfastly.
Zeeshan Sadiq
Third Year Student
Now, we shall briefly examine the biblical teachings regarding the gift of prophecy and its significance
in the current scenario.
But the very nature of the subject is beyond the general understanding of common man. Don Fleming
rightly said: “In the present day language the word ‘prophecy’ and prophet are usually used in a
relation to foretelling events …This was not the basic idea associated with the work of a prophet in the
Old Testament times. In those times prophecy meant making known the will of God.”[16] Merrill F.
Unger agrees with this view and infers that: “The prophet's message was ever religious and spiritual,
announcing the will of God to men and calling for complete obedience.” [17]It has also been suggested
that prophecy is a vehicle of revelation of the word of God to man from God. “In its most essential
form, prophecy is a vehicle of revelation. Revelation is the communication of God's word to
man.”[18]Jakob Jocz, describing the connotation of prophecy, writes: writes: “Prophecy is closely
associated with divination; both are means for determining the future or the unknown or for
ascertaining on particular occasions.”[19]
Modes of Reception in Prophecy
After having a general understanding of the nature of prophecy, another question grips our attention:
how did the prophets receive the divine messages? The Bible states that the prophet was not just
another wise man who used to give good advice but they were people who received a message from
God and proclaimed it. The Old Testament records various means by which the prophets received their
message from God. John Howard depicts: “The prophets were not automatons nor their inspiration
mechanical. Though altogether supernatural their inspiration had a psychological basis. Their dreams
and visions were sent from God.”[20] The prophets were geniuses, but mere genius does not constitute
prophecy. The prophets used to receive their messages, through visions (1Sam. 3:1, 15; 2Sam. 7:17;
Is.1:1; 6:1-6; Ezek.11:24; Dan. 8:1-2 etc.) And thus Num 12:6 states; “When a prophet of the Lord is
among you, I reveal myself to him in visions; I speak to him in dreams.” The next verses contrast this
with the communication given to Moses “But this is not true of my servant Moses; he is faithful in all
my house. With him I speak face to face, clearly and not in riddles; he sees the form of the Lord.” Joel
promised dreams in connection with prophetic gift (Jeol.2:28). The third most common means of
communication from God to prophet was a direct verbal message. We see the example of Samuel: he
heard a direct voice from God and many other prophets heard the message of God in the same way.
George Mallone points out another vehicle by which the prophetic message was received by a
prophet, “With Moses the mode of revelation was through a theophany, a visible manifestation of
Yahweh in burning bush (Ex.3:4).”[21]The Bible describes that the prophets also received their
message through angels as well. In short the prophets received their message through direct encounter,
in dreams, in visions, through angels, and through theophanies. There might be many other ways that
are still hidden and ambiguous to us. J. I. Packer states that “The psychology of Prophetic inspiration,
in which auditory, visionary, intuitive factors were all involved, is necessarily mysterious to us who do
not share it.”[22]
Modes of Transmission in Prophecy
Prophetism, by definition, is concerned not merely with the reception of the Word of God, but with its
communication as well. Though the phenomenon of prophecy existed in other nations, the hallmark of
the Old Testament prophecy was the prefatory formula: ‘thus says the Lord’ occurred hundreds of
times throughout the Old Testament. This formula proclaimed the source and the authority of the
prophets’ message. Packer writes about the mode of transmission in these words: “Commonly the
prophets spoke in God’s own person; the ‘I’ of there oracles is more often than not Jehovah
himself.”[23]
A dramatic style in the transmission of the prophetic message was also part and parcel of prophecy.
Grudem narrates that “from time to time dramatic physical symbolism accompanied a spoken prophetic
message.”[24] Elijah tore a new garment in to twelve pieces and gave ten to Jeroboam to symbolize the
division of the kingdom (1Kings 11:30-31); Elisha had king Joash shooting an arrow symbolizing
victory over the Syrians (2 Kings 13:15-18); Jeremiah smashed pottery to denote to judgment coming
on Jerusalem (Jer 19:10-13). Isaiah walked naked and barefooted (Is 20).
Some prophets couched their oracles in the form of parables or allegories (Is 5:1-7, 2 Sam 12:1-7). In
short “the acted oracles was movement from God to man; the word of God, the activity on which God
had already decided, was thus declared and promoted on the earth.”[25]
Schools of the Prophets
In several passages of the books of Samuel and Kings we read about the ‘bands of prophets’ or the
‘sons of the prophets’. What could be understood from these terms? This phenomenon prevails not only
in the books of Samuel but even in the days of Moses; when the Spirit came upon the seventy elders,
they appeared prophesying (Num.11). But this phenomenon looks more prominent in the days of
Samuel and it has also been suggested that “possibly Samuel was the first who founded such a school
of prophets.”[26] For at or near the city of Ramah we first find nayoth, or colonies of such disciples (1
Samuel.19: 18; 20:1). Mostly, when prophesying, they were found in a ecstatic condition and this
ecstasy was the result of the Spirit that came upon them. As Edward J. Young expresses:
The source of the “ecstatic” condition, therefore, is not to be found in the presence of
music, nor voluntary association, nor in contagion, nor for that matter in any self-
imposed or induced stimuli, but only in a “rushing upon” of the Spirit of God.[27]
The sons of the prophets appear again prominently in the ninth century B.C. in association with Elisha
II Kings 2:3; 3:11; 4:1, 38; 6:1-2). The term “son” is not intended to express actual sonship, “but in the
sense that they stood in a close and intimate relationship to the great master prophets, Elijah and
Elisha.”[28] Their major duty was to assist their master like Moses, Samuel, Elijah and Elisha. E. J.
Young infers that “we may assume that they were assisting in making known the will of God at this
particular time to the nation. When the great writing prophets appear upon the scene, the “sons of the
prophets” largely disappear.”[29] We should remember that the members of these groups were men of
prophetic gift (2 Kings 2:3, 5) the call of such prophets is still ambiguous. Alec Motyer says, “Whether
they joined the group by divine call or attracted by themselves to the prophets, attracted by his
teaching, or were called by him, we are not in a position to say.”[30]
The Authority of the Prophetic Message
According to the OT, prophets had an amazing responsibility – they were able to speak and write words
that had absolute divine authority. They could say, “Thus says the Lord,” and the words that followed
were the words of God. Because when a true prophet predicts events, those events surely come to pass;
according to the word of the Lord which He spoke through the prophets (1Kgs.14:18; 16:12, 34; 17:16;
22:38; 2Kgs.1:17; 7:16; 14:25; 22:2). Grudem points out the authority of a prophetic message by
presenting a sufficient pretext: “it is easy to understand why this should be so: if an omniscient,
omnipotent God predicts something, then it will surely happen, unless God Himself describes
otherwise.”[31]In fact the prophetic message comes right from God; therefore it is authoritative and
powerful as God’s own word; therefore the people have an obligation to believe and obey because to
believe in a prophet’s words is to believe in God (2Cor.36:15-16).
Prophecy Intertestamental Period
Old Testament prophecy ended with Malachi, approximately 400 years before the time of Jesus Christ.
No formal declaration was made that prophecy had ceased; it was only as time went on that people
began to realize that divine revelation had been absent for a period more protracted than ever before.
Three times in the book of 1 Maccabees[32], written during the event of the revolt of whom; against
st
the Syrian Antiochus Epiphanes[33] in the days following 168 B.C, the fact that there was no prophet
is Israel was noted with sadness (4:46; 9:27; 14:41).
New Testament Prophets and Prophecy
In fact the Old Testament did not come to an end with Malachi but with John the Baptist, as the Lord
expressly declared: “for all the prophets and the law prophesized until John” (Mt.11:13). In fact John
the Baptist served as a bridge between two Testaments. Prophetic utterances of John’s father Zechariah
and of Anna, Simon and Marry at the beginning of Luke’s gospel all bear witness to the continuance of
the prophetic inspiration (Luke 1:46-55,67-79;2:26-38). Michael Green states: “Prophecy had been
dead in Israel for centuries, but blazed into life again with the coming of Jesus Christ, the prophet of
Nazarareth, the prophet like Moses (Matthew 21:11, Acts 3:22, 7:37).”[34]
Prophecy in the New Testament Church
In the New Testament church, we come across certain prophets like Agabus and other prophets from
Jerusalem (Acts 11:27, 13:1, 21:9), Judas (Acts 15:32), Silas (Acts 15:32) and four daughters of Philip
(Acts 21:9). In the New Testament, prophecy is seen as gift even ordinary members of the church could
posses it.
Prophecy: A Gift of the Holy Spirit
According to 1Corinthian 12:8-11, prophecy is the gift of the Holy Spirit. The gifts enumerated in
(1Cor.12:8-11; 12:28, Rom.12:6-8, Eph.4:11) have deep association with the Holy Spirit. As Paul
mentioned, there are different kinds of gifts, but the same spirit (1 Cor.12:4). “A spiritual gift is a
manifestation of the Holy Spirit enabling one to minister to the needs of Christ’s body, the church
(12:7-11; 14:3, 12, 7).”[35] It has been observed that “A gift is something that is given to somebody
not because he or she deserves it, but because it is a token of extreme love towards some one.”[36] The
word gift is a very powerful in its depth, because it is the translation of a Greek word ‘charisma’
derived from ‘charis’ translated as grace. “And charis in Greek denotes Gods unmerited love for
us.”[37] So the gifts of the Holy Spirit including prophecy are the gifts of God’s grace. The modern
Greek word ‘charisma’ means ‘a birthday present’ which maintain the important emphasis of a love
gift.”[38]So Paul wants believers to know that all the gifts, including prophecy are by the love of God,
who gives to every believer. The Holy Spirit is also a gift of God to the believers, prophesized by Joel:
“And afterward I will pour out my spirit on all people; your sons and daughters will prophesy” (Joel
2:28), and reiterated by our Lord Jesus Christ in these words “I will not leave you as orphans” (John
14:18).This powerful prophetic promise that occurred in the Old Testament at various places was
consummated on the day of Pentecost[39], when the Holy Spirit was poured out, once for all, as
proclaimed by Jesus Himself and later testified by the apostle Peter on the very day of Pentecost (Act
2:14-18). Richard B. Hays observes: “The possession of any gift is therefore not a matter of individual
merit or worthiness but of the sheer free grace of God.”[40]So it could be said that the gift of prophecy
is a divine and promised gift, bestowed upon believers by the grace of God.
The Distinctive Nature of the Gift of Prophecy
The gift of prophecy holds distinctive characteristics in its nature and manifestation, as Paul depicted in
1Cor 14:3 when he states that the gift of prophecy strengthens, encourages and comforts the believers;
moreover it edifies and builds the church (v.4). Richard B. Hays describes up building or edification as:
Over the entire chapter (1 Cor14), however looms the theme of building up the church.
The verb oikodomein (“to build up”) and the noun oikodome (“upbuilding, edification”)
occurs seven times in this chapter, including the summarizing formulations verses 5, 12
and 26. The watchword and guiding principal for Christian worship is “Let all things be
done for building up” (v.26).[41]
In the discussion regarding gifts of Holy Spirit, the main motive that is always on top of the list, is the
up-building and edification of the church. Edification is literally “building up.” As F. D. Nichol states,
“the message of the prophets would serve to build up the experience of the Christian in progressive
stages.”[42] So, the gift of prophecy engulfs such marvelous characteristics and features as Paul
narrates: “But everyone who prophesies speaks to men for their strengthening, encouragement and
comfort.” (1 Cor.14:3).In order to comprehend the exact nature of the gift of prophecy we shall have to
check the original text of the Bible.
1. Strengthening
According to 1Cor.14:3, the first feature of the gift of prophecy is strengthening (NIV),
edification[43] (KJV), or up-building (RSV). The Greek word used for these words is oikodome
and “it is a general term which refers to any kind of help towards growth in Christian maturity and
prophecy is one of the activities which contribute to the edification of Christians in the
Church.”[44]
2. Encouragement
The second function is encouragement[45] (NIV, RSV), exhortation[46] (KJV). In the original text of
the Bible, the Greek word paraklesis has been used, and the related word parakletos is used for Holy
Spirit in John.14:16. On the other hand Grudem states that it “can mean ‘comfort’ (from sorrow:
(Lk.2:25; 6:24; 2Cor.1:3-7) or ‘encouragement’ (to those who are discouraged: Rom 15:4,5;2Cor
7:4,13) or ‘exhortation or appeal’ (that is, an urging someone to do something: 2Cor.8:17: 1Thess.2:4;
Heb.12:5;13:22).Grudem concludes regarding the nature of this word:
It has a weaker force than ‘command’, for Paul contrasts this verb ‘appeal, exhort’ with
the verb meaning ‘command’: “I am bold enough in Christ to command you…yet…I
prefer to appeal you” (Phil.8-9)…This word, then, is not very restrictive in meaning,
and would allow for prophecy to include a variety of kinds of speech which would bring
hearers at times ‘comfort’, at times ‘encouragement’, and at times ‘exhortation’ [47]
In short the gift of prophecy builds up believers in their faith by giving encouragement and exhortation
in all circumstances. David Prior says that ‘it literally means ‘to be called in alongside’ to assist and
support. The ministry of prophecy has this function, as Holy Spirit inspires a Christian to speak words
which give strength to the life and witness of the local church.”[48]
3. Comfort
The third term used, to expound the significance of the gift prophecy is ‘comfort’ (NIV, KJV),
consolation (RSV), paramythia (Greek), used only here in the NT.”[49] This multidimensional gift is
not only endowed with such remarkable characteristics like strengthening, encouragement but also
comfort or consolation. Michael Green urges, ‘this word has a sense of whispering in the church’s
ear.”[50] ‘Consolation calms the storm of fear, anxiety and despair. It helps us rest in the presence of
Jesus…It leads away from the hectic bustle of daily affairs, away from the restlessness of this life, into
the great peace of God.” [51]In any company of people there will always be some depressed and
frustrated people, through this characteristic of the gift prophecy, they will “find beauty for their ashes,
the oil of joy for mourning, and garment of praise for the spirit of their heaviness.”[52]
In the light of such magnificent attributes like strengthening, encouragement and comfort, and power to
convict the unbelievers (1Cor.14:24-26), it could be inferred that the gift of prophecy is furnished
with a distinctive nature[53]. Due to all these characteristics of this gift, Paul had to advise again and
again to the Corinthians, “…eagerly desire spiritual gifts, especially the gift of prophecy” (1Cor.14:1),
“Therefore, my brothers, be eager to prophecy” (v.39).
This precise and concise definition elucidates the church as a charismatic community, meaning a
community endowed with spiritual gifts (Rom 12:6-10; 1Cor 12:4-10). But the dilemma of the present
age is this: there are some scholars who believe that certain gifts like healing, tongues and prophecy
ceased within the apostolic age. They are usually known as cessationists or dispensationists. Among
these scholars most prominent are Benjamin B. Warfield[63] and F. David Farnell[64]. On the other
hand there are some people from the Evangelical Charismatic circle like Wayne Grudem[65], Michael
Green, and Max Turner, who strongly believe that certain gifts are still present in the church. In this
chapter we shall examine such views concerning the gift of prophecy. Either the gift of prophecy
ceased or it is still present in the church. For better comprehension, I shall expound my view
exegetically, theologically and historically. But first let me point out some arguments that are presented
to prove the cessation of the gift of prophecy.
The Cessationists’ Approach toward Gift of Prophecy
The Cessationists give several arguments to prove that the gift of prophecy ceased before the end of the
apostolic age. They argue that the gift of prophecy was given for the formation of the canon[66], and
when the canon was completed the gift of prophecy ceased. F.D. Farnell quoted in a doctoral
dissertation the following statement passed by C.C. Ryrie to prove that the gift prophecy does no exist
in today’s church:
The gift of prophecy included receiving a message directly from God through special
revelation, being guided in declaring it to the people, and having it authenticated in
some way by God himself…This… was a gift limited in its need and use, for it was
needed during the writing the New Testament and its usefulness ceased when the books
were completed.[67]
His view is that the gift of prophecy was given for the formation of the canon and when the canon of
the bible was completed this miraculous gift came to an end.
This argument is built upon certain biblical references like 1Cor.13:8-13, in which it is
suggested that the gift of prophecy ceased with the completion of the canon. The word “perfect” used
in verse 10 is associated with the completion of Scripture.
The cessationists also use Ephesians 2:20, by arguing that the gift of prophecy was a foundational gift,
like the apostles, and its purpose was completed once the NT church was established.
A third reference, Revelation 22:18 is utilized to refute any present-day exercise of the gift of
prophecy. According to this text, “prophecy is seen as adding to God’s already completed
revelation.”[68] It is also argued by some scholars that present-day prophecies challenge the
sufficiency of the Bible. John F. MacArthur says:
There is no substitute for the Word of God. There is no “something more.” Don’t seek
energy for the spiritual walk in the empty “prophecies” of someone’s imagination…God
has given us his Word, which is “profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for
training in righteousness; that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every
good work” (2Tim.3:16).That is all the truth we need for every spiritual need in life.[69]
Another argument is presented from church history that the Montanism[70] was a heretical movement
and rejected by the church fathers. Augustine wrote against the movement, and “the Council at
Constantinople decreed that Montanism was tantamount to paganism.”[71]
In short the cesstionists use several means to prove their argument concerning the cessation of
prophecy.
The Noncesstionists’ Approach toward the Gift of Prophecy
In the above discussion, we briefly viewed the cessationists’ arguments concerning the gift of
prophecy. To come to a clear conclusion we shall have to examine such arguments exegetically,
historically and theologically.
Exegesis: The cessationists use 1Cor.13:8-13 as a pretext for the cessation of the gift of prophecy.
Either this supposition is up to the mark or it is not. Let us view it according to vrs.9-10, “For we know
in part, and we prophesy in part, but when perfection comes, the imperfect disappears.” From these
verses, it is asserted that the gift of prophecy came to end with the completion of the canon. In
particular the issue resolves around the word “perfect,” which is often associated by cessationists with
completion of the canon.
If we carefully look below the surface of the original text, the Greek word ‘τελειον’[72] is used, which
simply means “end,” “fulfillment,” “completeness” or “maturity”[73]George Mallone points out that,
“Inherently in the word is no concept of a written record. This is simply a theological deduction. ”[74]
If we exegete this word ‘perfect’ it does not point toward the completion of the canon, as is claimed by
the cessationists. To correlate this word with the completion of the canon is an exegetical fallacy.
The word “perfection” refers to the maturity of the church, or maturity of the believers; and the
maturity of the church will be realized only at the second coming of the Lord Jesus Christ. As David
Prior states:
So long as we have not yet seen Jesus as he is, we are still short of maturity, of
adulthood as Christians. By His grace we have been given many gifts through which we
may see more of his glory and will, even in the limitations of this mortal life. These
gifts, all of them, are the media of revelation into the nature and purposes of God. Every
gift is valuable for our growth into maturity.[75]
It cannot be denied that the cessation of the gift of prophecy is closely linked with the arrival of
“perfection,” but this text never says that it will happen at the completion of the canon as the
cessationists claim.
The gifts of the Holy Spirit including prophecy were bestowed upon believers for their up-building and
edification. But if someone says these gifts of tongues, prophecy and miracles were only until the
completion of the canon, it would be totally against Biblical teaching. Because we live in a fallen world
and are bound to our contaminated nature, we are always in need of guidance, exhortation,
encouragement and comfort, which is a distinctive character of the gift of prophecy.
So for as the word “imperfect” is concerned, v.10 points to the fact that “our knowledge of the divine
things is partial, and our prophecies likewise are, at best, partial information.”[76] The Bible clearly
states that the apostles even though they knew certain supernatural mysteries, time and again they
admitted their illiteracy concerning the pros and cons of divine realities. As the Apostle John,
describes in 1Jn.3:2: “Dear friends, now we are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been
made known.” And the same type of statement is found in 1Cor.13:12a where Paul admits: “Now we
see but a poor reflection as in a mirror.” So in both references clearly state that our knowledge of
divine realities is incomplete. As Grudem states:
The mirror imagery suggests both indirectness and incompleteness in the knowledge
that comes…what is seen or learned is only a glimpse of some reality…The
expression ‘dimly, in a puzzling way’ indicates that what is seen or learned, or the
implications of what is ‘revealed’, are often difficult to understand (Jn.11:50; 1 Pet
1:11).[77]
It may be deduced from this that the completion of this imperfect knowledge will come to an end at the
second coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, when we will be glorified by the power of Holy Spirit. The
analogy of the mirror makes it clear that Paul was pointing towards the second coming of Jesus Christ.
Because in those days though the Corinthians were famous in producing the best quality mirror, yet it
still gave an imperfect reflection. That way they could easily comprehend that there were several divine
realities which were beyond the understanding, but there would be a time when they would come to
know everything fully.
But it might be argued that in this text the word parousia in not used, so how could it possibly reflect
the picture of the second coming of Lord Jesus Christ? But Paul says in v.12b “then we shall see face
to face.” This process will only happen at the second coming of the Lord Jesus Christ. As it is written
in 1John3:3 when Jesus will appear, “we shall be like him.” So by this text, it never seems that Paul
was intentionally referring to the completion of the canon, but that his prime motive was to prepare
them to use spiritual gifts with love, which will remain forever. So, from this text, those who adhere to
the idea of the completion of the canon are entirely off track. As Paul is declaring that these gifts, like
tongues and prophecy will cease, the clause “when the completion of all thing occurs,” does not refer to
the close of the canon, but rather to the second coming of our Lord. So, we should conclude that this
text doest not point toward the completion of the canon but to the second coming of our Lord Jesus
Christ.
Using Ephesians.2:20, the cessationists argue that, “the foundation once laid, does not change, is
unmovable, and inalterable. And so we note that just as Christ is a once-for-all and never to be repeated
Cornerstone that was laid as part of the foundation of the Church, so also, the apostles and prophets are
a once-for-all and never to be repeated aspect of the foundation.”[78]
Here the cessationists are mistaken in asserting that by writing this verse Paul was preparing the
Ephesians for the cessation of the gift of prophecy. The context shows that his prime focus was to
remind them that now they were part and parcel of that building, founded by the apostles and prophets,
and whose corner stone is the Lord Jesus Christ. George Mallone states: “The intention of this verse is
not to say that these gifts have ceased but only that any gift exercised must be in harmony with the
instructions of the founding apostles and prophets.”[79] It can not be said that the apostles and
prophets were the actual foundation of the New Testament Church. According to 1Cor3:11 “No one
can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ.” The foundation is Jesus
Christ not the apostles and prophets. Paul was reminding the Ephesians that the church had been
established on Jesus Christ’s teaching which were delivered by the apostles and prophets. John Stott
says: “Since apostles and prophets were both groups with a teaching role, it seems clear that what
constitutes the church’s foundation is neither their person nor their office but their instruction.”[80] In
fact Lord Jesus Christ is the real foundation of the Church and the apostles and prophets are the
builders. They preached the gospel of Jesus Christ and founded churches all over the Roman Empire.
The message of the gospel preached these selected men, could not be changed by anyone. As Paul
states, in Gal.1:8 “But even we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than one we
preached to you, let him be eternally condemned.” According to this verse no one can change the
message of the gospel, even prophets of today. As John Stott states: “The New Testament foundation of
the church is inviolable and cannot be changed by any additions, subtractions or modification offered
by the teachers who claim to be apostles or prophets today.”[81]
The gospel preached by the New Testament apostles and prophets is definitely once for all, no
alteration can ever be possible. The apostles and prophets were the builders and by using metaphorical
language Paul declared their position as foundation and Jesus Christ as cornerstone. We are all, who
accepted Jesus Christ as our Lord and Savior, are the part and parcel of God’s temple. And this process
will continue till the second coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. For this purpose God is calling thousands
of people, so that they may become of the part of God’s temple. We should give glory to the name of
our God, because God is using the charismatics (who believe in a present-day gift of prophecy) in a
remarkable way to win people for Christ. Cessationists therefore should be eager to use the gift of
prophecy rather than discourage the people by denying its availability.
The cessationists, using Rev.22:18-19[82], refute the present-day exercise of the gift of prophecy. They
consider prophecy as a tool for adding to God’s completed revelation in the canon. But those who
believe in the present-day gift of prophecy never adhere to an idea addition in the canon of Bible.
Because most of the non-cessationists, do believe in the sufficiency of Bible. George Mallone writes,
“To my knowledge no noncessationist in the mainstream of Christianity claims that revelation today is
equal with Scripture.”[83]Another important thing that has to be remembered is that the warning
mentioned in these verses, never points towards the people who would hold the gift of prophecy, but
points towards the message of Christ. As Daniel Bakhsh writes in his book:
Adding or taking away is a warning not to change the message of Christ. St. Paul
sounds a similar warning in Galatians 1:9, “As we have already said, so now I say
again: if anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be
eternally condemned.”[84]
So to assert that these verses point towards the cessation of prophecy is a totally mistaken view, which
has no ground for claiming the cessation of the gift of prophecy. The canon is closed and there is no
need to add to or delete from it. When the issue of ‘adding or taking away’ is raised we must not
interpret this rule as stating that God will not be able to speak any more apart from what he has already
revealed in the bible. Rather it refers to what a man can or cannot add to or delete from the written
word of prophecy (the Bible), as Paul stated in Galatians1:8, “But even if we or any angel from the
heaven should preach a other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally condemned.”
But we should keep this in our minds that though the Bible teaches us to pray it does not tell us
specifically for whom we should pray, in the time of need. Secondly, there is no doubt that the Bible
teaches us to evangelize but it never mentions where we should evangelize. So the gift of prophecy
helps us in providing special guidance for specific ministries. As it is written in the book of Acts13:1-3,
“In the church at Antioch there prophets…while they were worshiping the Lord and fasting the Holy
Spirit said, “Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.” These
verses clearly state that the gift of prophecy helps us to formulate any program for the service of the
Lord. In short the noncessationsts strongly believe in the sufficiency of the Bible and never allow that
anything can be added to the canon.
Another hurdle, which is placed in the way of non-cessationists, is that this gift was given for the
formation of the canon, (C.C. Ryrie) and when it was formed, the gift of prophecy ceased within the
apostolic age. If we however, carefully examine the Biblical teachings, several references point to the
fact that many people who prophesied had nothing to do with the formation of the canon, neither in the
OT nor in the NT.
There are many OT Prophesies not classified as “Prophecy of Scripture: The prophecies of the elders
under Moses (Number 11:24), Saul’s prophecies (1Sam. 10:10f), the prophecies of “the company of
prophets” (1Samuel 19:20), the prophecies of “the sons of the prophets” (2Kings 2:3), the many who
prophesied accompanied by musical instruments under David (1Chr. 25:1f).Even in the NT there are
Prophesies not classified as “Prophecy of Scripture”: The prophesying of the disciples in Ephesus (Acts
19:6), the Christians in Tyre (Acts.21:4), Phillip’s Daughters (Acts21:9), Agabus (21:10), the
prophesying of the Corinthians (1Cor.1:7), the prophesying of “the body of elders” over Timothy (1
Tim 4:14). In the light of above references it could be inferred that there were many prominent figures
in the OT and in the NT who had nothing do with the formation of the canon.
Does the History Provide Evidences for the Gift of Prophecy?
Some cessationists try to prove the cessation of the gift of prophecy historically including other gifts
like miracles and tongues. But Millard J. Erickson states; “Those who reject the idea that the Holy
Spirit is still dispersing the charismatic gifts argue historically that the miraculous gifts ceased; they are
virtually unknown throughout most of the history of the church.”[85]The history of the church provides
several evidences to prove the existence of the gift of prophecy even after the apostolic age. Knowing
about the continuation of the gift of prophecy in the history of the church, it would be much better to
know the views of some prominent church fathers concerning our subject.
Ignatius of Antioch[86] (ca 35-ca107) had this gift. Michael Green writes that “he was personally used
to giving words of prophecy.”[87]In his letter to the Ephesians, “he speaks of revelations granted to
him…in other letter he urges Ploycarp…to seek heavenly revelations”[88] History shows that Ignatius
was considered as a “prophetic” man. Irenaeus bishop of Lugdunum and a leading Christian theologian
of the 2nd century, spoke of prophecies.[89]Teritullian, an important early Christian theologian and
polemicist, believed in the gift of prophecy. In 207A.D he aligned himself with the Montanists, a sect
that encouraged prophesying. Once he declared, “We too have merited the attainment of the prophetic
gift.” Origen, the most important theologian and biblical scholar of the early Greek Church, witnessed
to gifts such as exorcism, healing and prediction.”[90] Bishop Mileto of Sardis had the gift of
prophecy. Michael Green has brought to our attention recently the discovered Bodmer papyri that the
2 century Bishop Melito “distinguished Christian teacher suddenly speaks out a prophecy and Christ
nd
Even theologically it cannot be argued that the gift of prophecy ceased, because every true believer
believes that our God is an omnipresent, omnipotent and omniscient God. And we can not squeeze or
limit the authority of God, though the Bible is the Word of God but even so God is not bound, but
above all boundaries and limitations. God does speak apart from the Bible in dreams, visions and
through audible voices, and we should not argue that now He cannot speak or give revelation to
anyone. God cannot, though, contradict his Word.
The Bible clearly teaches that the gift of prophecy is a gift of the Holy Spirit who lives in our lives so
that we may glorify our God in a more appropriate manner. So if the Holy Spirit is in our lives how can
we deny his manifestations, in the form of Spiritual gifts? Secondly, if the early church needed this gift
to be strengthened, exhorted, comforted and edified, why it is not essential for today’s believers? The
Bible and history prove the significance and continuation of the gift of prophecy.
Views towards the Existence of the Gift of Prophecy
Our debate on prophecy does not end with consideration of its presence today but continues with a
survey of different views concerning prophecy. Different scholars have different approaches to the
subject of prophecy. There are three major schools of thought, which we shall examine in turn.
a. The Gift of Prophecy exists in the Form of Preaching or Teaching.
The first school of thought strongly believes that the gift of prophecy still exists in the church but in the
form of preaching or the exposition of the word of God. John Calvin defines prophecy in the following
words: “By prophesying I do not understand the gift of foretelling the future, but the science of
interpreting the Scriptures, so that a prophet is an interpreter of the will of God.”[99]J. I. Packer also
has the same approach concerning the contemporary gift of prophecy, he says: “The essence of the
prophetic ministry was forthtelling God’s present word to his people, and this regularly meant
application to the revealed truth rather than augmentation of it. As Old Testament prophets preached
the law and recalled Israel to face God’s covenant…So New Testament prophets preached the gospel
…for conversion, edification and encouragement…By parity of reasoning, therefore, any verbal
enforcement of biblical teaching as it applies to one’s present hearers may probably be called prophecy
today, for that in truth is what it is”.[100]
b. Today’s Prophecy Is As Authoritative as the Bible.
The second school of thought holds a view that has some disturbing consequences. It is the view that
the revelations God gives today are as authoritative as the Bible.
c. Today’s Prophecy Is Not as Authoritative as the Bible.
The third school of thought adopting a moderate position believes that today’s prophecy is not as
authoritative as the Bible. David Pytches suggests: “prophecy is a ‘two-tier’ phenomenon. There is the
authoritative type of prophecy in which God speaks directly through a person (1Cor.14:36-38) and
there is the ‘low-level’ prophecy which is commonly found today.”[101] By ‘low-level’ Pytches means
that the authority of the prophetic message being received today is less than that of biblical prophecy.
Is Today’s Prophecy Merely Exposition of the Bible and Biblical Teaching?
The efforts to associate the gift of prophecy with the exposition of the Bible or with the teaching of its
message have been built upon the ideas of some venerable figures of Christianity such as Calvin,
Luther and J. I. Packer. Yet it should be argued the basic teachings of the Bible show that prophecy is
different from preaching or teaching. To some extent it could be accepted that prophecy is like the
exposition of the Bible, but not fully. Because the Bible distinguishes clearly between the gift of
teaching and the gift of prophecy (Acts.13:1; Rom.12:6; 1Cor.12:28; Eph.4:11), there is a difference
between prophecy and teaching. Prophecy also has the function to teach (1Cor.14:31) but the essential
nature of prophecy differs from preaching because prophecy is closely associated with ‘revelation’; on
the other hand exposition of the Bible is always based on one’s study, skill, experience or meditation.
Grudem makes a clear distinction between prophecy and teaching in the following words:
If a message is the result of conscious reflection on the text of Scripture, containing
interpretation of the text and application to life, then it is (in New Testament terms) a
teaching. But if a message is the report of something God brings suddenly to the mind,
then it is a prophecy.[102]
We should be clear when distinguishing between the gift of ‘prophecy’ and that of ‘preaching’ or
‘teaching’. Richard Griffen states: “Prophecy is not the interpretation of an already existing inspired
text.... but is itself the inspired, non-derivative Word of God.”[103] While prophecy is based upon the
report of spontaneous revelation given by the Holy Spirit, teaching might be the result of one’s
personal efforts or skills. George Mallone states: “If the source of the preacher’s sermon is the Word of
God, then it can be said that he is fulfilling a prophetic function as he preaches. But Prophecy is not the
exclusive prerogative of the Bible preacher. Acts 13:1 makes it perfectly clear that there were both
teachers and prophets in Antioch.”[104] Michael Harper, a prominent Anglican Pastor, also
differentiates between prophet and preacher as follows: “A preacher usually prepares, speaks and
expounds from the Word of God. But a prophet speaks directly under the anointing of the Holy Spirit.
Both have a part to play in the edification of the church – but they should not be confused.”[105] So, it
can be inferred that prophecy differs from the expository preaching and cannot be confused with it.
Is Today’s prophecy As Authoritative as the Bible?
The question of authority demands our peculiar attention regarding the subject of the gift of prophecy
because to compromise on the authority of the Bible could undermine one’s faith. There are several
from among the Charismatics who believe that today’s gift of prophecy is as authoritative as the Word
of God. But those who assert this view need to remember that the Bible is the final authority and no
one can change this reality. As Dr. Aslam Ziai asserts:
Some people do not make a difference between the written Word of prophecy (the
Bible) and the living word of prophecy (God’s word given to a believer for a particular
time for a particular place, person or congregation). Some believers out of their
spiritual zeal do not hesitate to equate their ‘prophetic utterances’ with the written word
of prophesy. An acid test for any prophetic utterance is its subjection to the written
word of God.[106]
We should never forget that revelation in today’s church is different from the biblical revelation in its
nature and function. While revelation is given today for a particular time and for specific people,
biblical revelation is universal in its nature and function. As Mallone asserts concerning today’s
revelation: “It is a particular word, given to a particular person or group of persons, at a particular
moment, for a particular purpose.”[107]
There are certain people[108] who deny the authority of the bible by saying the revelations God gives
to us today are equal to the Biblical revelation. This is alarming for people who are not mature in their
faith. As John Wimber says: “some people believe mystical experience or private
revelation to be equal to or superior to Scripture. This is dangerous, because
“truth” that is determined by an inner revelation lies outside the scope of
objective restraints...Personal experience and private revelation need the checks
and guidance that only the Bible can provides.”[109]
Contemporary revelatory utterances can never be equal to biblical utterances.
Because according to 1Cor.12:28 “God has first appointed apostles second prophets,” (that is why the
directives towards the worship order were given by the apostle Paul rather than from the prophets
(1Cor.14:26-38). Even the Prophecies of the prophets were subject to being weighed or tested, but this
was not so with the teachings of the apostles (1Cor.14:31). The apostles were directly appointed by the
Lord Jesus Christ, so their teachings were more authoritative than the prophecies of the NT prophets.
As Hodge points out: “The difference between the apostles and prophets was that the former were
permanently inspired, so that their teachings were at all infallible, whereas the prophets were infallible
occasionally.”[110] So we can infer that the authority of the prophets in the New Testament was less
than the apostles.
Here my intention is not to prove the authority of the apostles over the prophets but rather to
clarify the authority of the Bible over the contemporary self claiming prophets and their prophecies.
The Bible is authoritative because it is sufficient, inerrant and incorruptible (1Timothy 3:16), and there
is no need to weigh or judge its authority, but present–day prophecies require to be weighed and tested
as was essential with the New Testament prophets, (1Tess 5:29), because the NT prophets were merely
speaking the human word that God spontaneously brought to their mind. Thus Bill Patton defined
today’s prophecy as: “a report of a revelation in human words for edification of the church or an
individual subject to evaluation.”[111] So, we must never say that any revelation out side the bible can
be equal to the biblical revelation. Because in today’s world there are a lot of people, especially from
the Charismatic camp, who think that the revelations they receive today are equal in authority with the
biblical revelation.
So, whenever anybody uses the gift of prophecy he or she must not think that his or her revelations are
as authoritative as biblical revelation, but they must deliver them humbly because it is subject to the
biblical or canonical revelation which is the only standard for evaluation.
of Pentecostalism. Three waves of Pentecostalism brought about a great revolution in the life of
Church. It is essential to know how the gift of prophecy was treated in all these three movements.
First Wave
The first wave of Pentecostalism emerged from the Wesleyan Holiness movements in the United States
at the start of the 20th century. “The movement first appeared in 1901 in Topeka, Kansas, and in 1906
in Los Angeles when the first Pentecostals began to “speak in tongues.”[112]
Pentecostals believe that they must experience a “second baptism,” beyond water baptism, in which the
Holy Spirit comes to them. They not only speak in tongues but interpret them; they prophesy; and many
engage in healing, claiming that miraculous healing did not cease after the apostolic period, as many
other Christians believe.
The Pentecostal movement in the United States developed among rural poor whites and urban blacks in
the South. After the mid-20th century, fast-growing denominations like the Assemblies of God made
Pentecostalism one of the most visible forms of Protestantism and became increasingly acceptable to
the middle classes.
Second Wave
The second wave is known as the Charismatic Movement (Greek charismata,” spiritual gifts”), an
international, interdenominational Christian revivalistic movement, also referred to as Neo-
Pentecostalism. The individuals who make up the movement believe that they have been “filled” or
“baptized” with the Holy Spirit through the laying on of hands. The signs of this baptism include such
spiritual gifts as speaking in tongues, or glossolalia, prophecy, healing, interpretation of tongues, and
discernment of spirits. This movement is considered to have begun in 1960, with a group of
Episcopalians in Van Nuys, California. District charismatic networks and organizations soon arose
within the Baptist, Lutheran, Methodist, Presbyterian, and other Protestant denominations. A small
element exists within Eastern Orthodoxy. As has Pentecostalism, the charismatic movement has
produced myriad groups, independent preachers and healers, and a few near-cultic offshoots. Most
charismatics, however, are orthodox in doctrine and emphasize activity within their own
denominations. They are ecstatic in worship, although generally more subdued than Pentecostalists,
and they align themselves with other Evangelicals in their emphasis on evangelism and personal faith
in Christ.
Third Wave
The latest and fastest-growing movement is known as the Vineyard Movement. “It is also known as the
“Signs and Wonder” or “Third Wave” movement. This new movement is composed largely of
Reformed and Dispensationalist evangelicals who preferred not to identify with the Pentecostal or
charismatics but who are very much interested in the work of the Holy Spirit, holding that the
miraculous (or “sign”) gifts of the New Testament have continued into the present age.”[113] This
movement developed as the of the intersecting ministries of C. Peter Wager professor of missions at
Fuller Theological Seminary in Pasadena, California, and John Wimber, pastor of the Vineyard
Christian Fellowship in Anaheim, California.
Prophecy and Three waves
As we noted, from the beginning of 20 century till today these three waves have influenced today’s
th
church considerably. The followers of all these movement talk much about the gifts of the Holy Spirit,
but they also practice the gifts, including prophecy. So, if we see the practice of the gift of prophecy in
today’s church, it is due to the impact of these three movements.
The Use of Prophecy at World Level
We showed in the first chapter that ‘the gift of prophecy’ is enumerated with distinctive characteristics.
It strengthens, encourages and comforts the believers and it also convicts the unbelievers. So, now it is
time to examine how this gift is being utilized in the contemporary world for the up-building and
edification of believers.
First example:
John Wimber reports an occasion when, relaxing and looking casually round the plane
cabin, he was arrested by ‘seeing’ the word ‘adultery’ written across a passenger’s face.
He then received the name of the other party involved, and the warning the man would
not live if he did not repent. (This disclosure of his sin came as a bombshell to the man
concerned, and led to his conversion).[114]
Second example: Jack Deere reports a prophecy of Paul Cain to a couple, Kevin and Regina Forest.
The prophecy contained a detailed disclosure of events in the couple’s life, Including that there
daughter had recently died [Kevin had in fact lost his former faith precisely because he blamed God for
the death of their daughter]; that Regina’s brother had also recently died; that Kevin had committed
adultery and was considering running away and creating a new identity. The prophecy went on to assert
that all this was a great Satanic attack on them, and that Satan was out to destroy twenty-eight year old
Kevin before he was thirty {Kevin was indeed already seriously considering suicide as the alternative
to running away}.God, however, would turn all this to blessing if Kevin repented and if Regina gave up
her bitterness and forgave him. Cain’s assertion[115] that it was not God, but Satan who had killed
their daughter, coupled with Cain’s detailed insight into their situation, provoked a deep repentance
(not) just in the Forests), reconciliation and renewal of marriage vows. Today, Kevin goes by “John”.
The Lord has given John and Regina two beautiful daughters in the place of the one Satan killed. Not
only was the Forest’s marriage saved, but also Satan was vanquished. Not only was the Forests’
marriage saved, but also their lives were completely transformed by the grace that was communicated
to them on the night of July 5, 1989. Today they are home-ground leaders effectively pastoring people
in their church. The satanic power of sexual immorality over John was broken that night, and he
discovered the power of the blood of God’s Son to cleanse, restore, and set free. The Devil had
convinced Kevin Forest that the only had two alternatives: either run or commit suicide. The prophetic
ministry of the Holy Spirit gave him another and better choice.”[116]
This marvelous illustration clearly states that the gift of prophecy is helpful for the up-building of
believers. What a great gift this is! Such type of practices must be encouraged.
Third example: “Moses Vegh, a traveling minister with a prophetic gifting, before a flight to
Hungary was praying to the Lord, “Lord, I speak for you. I give your words to many others. But I need
a word from you. I need someone to give me confirmation that this trip to Hungary is going to be
profitable for the Kingdom of God.” Just before takeoff, one of the flight attendants, a young lady
whom he had never seen before, came down the aside to Brother Vegh’s seat and spontaneously began
to prophesy over him. It was a very startling experience for him because he received a strong message
from her, concerning his ministry in Hungary”[117]
In the light of the above prophecies a prophet can identify the sins of individuals; any man, he can even
foretell judgment or any other thing. But the prime purpose of a prophecy is to edify the
believers.
Abuse of Prophecy at World Level
The positive use of the gift of prophecy edifies the believers but the abuse of prophecy can create a lot
of problems among believers. Since the Pentecostals and Charismatics churches are growing, the
problem of the misuse of prophecy is also increasing rapidly. Let us examine some prophecies
delivered by some prominent world evangelists of our day.
1. Kenneth Copeland: a self-proclaimed prophet, once prophesied, as Jesus was speaking through him
at a three day “victory camp” in Dallas Texas.
Don't be disturbed when people accuse you of thinking you're God. Don't be disturbed
when people accuse you of a fanatical way of life. Don't be disturbed when people put
you down and speak harshly and roughly of you. They spoke that way of me, should
they not speak that way of you? The more you get to be like me, the more they're going
to think that way of you. They crucified me for claiming I was God. But I didn't claim
I was God; I just claimed I walked with him and he was in me. "Hallelujah. That’s what
your doing.[118]
Copeland's "prophecy" is clearly false, because the Lord Jesus Christ did claim to be God. (John 8:58;
Mark 14:61-64; John 6:16-18; 10:30-33)
2. Benny Hinn: This prophecy delivered by Benny Hinn on December 31, 1989 at the Orlando
Christian Center.
The Lord also tells me to tell you, In the mid-90's--about '94 or '95--no later than that,
God will destroy the homosexual community of America (applause). But He will not
destroy it with what many minds have thought Him to be. He will destroy it with fire.
And many will turn and be saved, and many will rebel and be destroyed.[119]
One more prophecy delivered by Benny Hinn at another place regarding the subject of God, as:
God, the Father is a person, God the Son is a person, God the Holy Ghost is a person,
but each one of them is a triune being by himself. If I can shock you and maybe I
should, there are nine of them.... God the Father is a person with his own personal spirit,
with his own personal soul, and his own personal spirit body. You say, "I never heard of
that." Well, do you think you're in this church to hear things you've heard for the last
fifty years? You can't argue with the Word can you? It's all in the Word.[120]
So, this is the present situation regarding the misuse of the gift of prophecy at world level. Such types
of unbiblical prophecies and prophets must be discouraged and right biblical teachings must be taught
so that the body of Christ may grow in the right direction.
Rev. Philips Dutt is Pentecostal pastor of New Vision Evangelical Fellowship Church Gujranwala, He
also believes that the gift of prophecy still present in today’s church. He shares his personal experience
regarding the use of prophecy as follow:
In 2002, I was in Martin-Pur with a Rev. Joseph Bomber. We were there for a healing meeting. During the
meeting people were standing for healing in a row and a young girl was also among them. In the mean
while when on Rev. Bomber was praying for sick people, he said to me “Rev. Philip, do not let this girl
stand among these people, let her stand separately.” I tried to over look this but he insisted. So, I had to do
as he said. After praying for the sick he prophesied, and directly spoke to that girl. He said, “I know you
are not sick but your mother is sick and you are standing on behalf of her.” This prophecy was absolutely
right because the girl later told us, “yes I was standing for my mother’s healing, she is so sick and cannot
even attend this meeting, so I stand for her…” Then I and Rev. Bomber went to that girl’s house to see her
mother at mid night. When we reached there, her mother was in very serious condition, she could not
even breathe properly. Then, Rev. Bomber said, “I do not know how long she will remain alive but I
know that now she will be healed”. He prayed and God healed her right on the spot. The prophetic words
of the Rev. Bomber not only explored the inner desire of the girl’s heart but also healed her mother.[122]
So, this is the response of the Pentecostals and Charismatics concerning the gift of prophecy. The
Pentecostals and Charismatics strongly believe, and encourage their members of the church to be eager
for the gifts of the Holy Spirit including prophecy. A lot of examples could be given in this regard, but
narrations elucidated above would be enough to confirm their conviction about the gift of prophecy.
The Abuse of the Gift of Prophecy
The abuse of prophecy can be easily seen in Pakistan. There are some Pentecostals and Charismatics
misusing the gift of prophecy. By saying “God told me”, “God spoke to me,” they try to prove
themselves to be prophets. The abuse of prophecy is causing serious problems among the believers.
Before discussing the problems, we shall survey of some recent prophecies made by some Pentecostals
and Charismatics.
1st example: “Ten years ago in Mohalla-Ghulam-Pura, Gujranwala, a young girl died. At the funeral ceremony of that girl a certain pastor prophesied that “this girl will be
resurrected on the third day”. But she was never raised from the dead. This was a false prophecy based on the personal imagination of the pastor rather than on God’s
words.”[123]
2nd example: “Two year back, a prominent evangelist put his hands on the head of a lady and prophesied: “God is telling me that your relationship with your husband is not
right,” so you need to restore it” This was also a false prophecy because she was not yet married.”[124]
3rd example: “Once a pastor went to a home for visitation where a lady was pregnant. She already had four daughters. The pastor prophesied by putting his hand on her belly:
“Bahin Jee God told me that this time He will bless you with a son” Later this prophecy went wrong because she bore a daughter. The husband of that lady was so annoyed over
4th example: “In our country there are several people from the Pentecostals who claim that God speaks to them and even give them poetry for hymns. A prominent Christian
singer considers his hymns as prophetical. Some of his hymns are unbiblical, based on his personal imagination. The worst aspect of this is this that he is not willing to accept his
mistakes. He says that “I don’t believe in any, theology because God tells me directly and I write.”[126]
5th example: Some years ago, there was a Pentecostal group in Sahiwal. One of them prophesied that God told him. “Jesus is coming to take us,” he even told the exact day of
Jesus’ appearance. On that specific day all the members of that group gathered in a ground, some climbed over trees and began to wait for the appearance, but Jesus never
appeared; soon afterwards they warns had to go back to their homes.
6th example: In 1992, a young man from Sahiwal claimed that God gave him special message. He prophesied: “God told me that I should marry with lady”. When his parent
went to that ladies home to ask her hand in marriage for their son, the parents of that lady got really infuriated and cursed them, and threatened them they bash them up so that
they ran away.
All these prophecies narrated above were never fulfilled, because they were all false prophecies. Some prophesied to make other people happy. Some tried to express their desire
by taking the plea of God’s name. Gradually this trend is developing and it is the need of hour to discourage such kind of prophecies. Because false prophecies are creating
problems and crisis among believers. So we need to be careful in such kind of situations.
The first test for a false prophet is his accuracy. True prophets were 100% accurate. Not 95% or even 99%, but 100%. True prophets were controlled by God, so they never
missed. If a prophet missed even one time, that "prophet" was a "false prophet".
Those who claim to be prophets today miss all the time. The amazing thing, however, is that even though they predict things that do not come to pass, they do not lose their
following. In the Old Testament they would have lost their life! God so despised false prophets that in the verse prior to our last text, He instituted the death penalty for them.
“But a prophet, who presumes to speak in my name anything I have not commanded him to say, or a prophet who speaks in
the name of other gods, must be put to death.” (Deuteronomy 18:20)
“If a prophet, or one who foretells by dreams, appears among you and announces to you a miraculous sign or the wonder, and
if the sign and wonder of which he has spoken takes place, and he says, “Let us follow other gods,” (gods you have not
known) “and let us worship them,” You must not listen to the words of that prophet or dreamer. The LORD your God is
testing you to find out whether you love him with all your heart and with all your soul.” (Deuteronomy 13:1-3)
In this case, what the false prophet predicts comes to pass, but he is still a false prophet. God will sometimes allow this to test people to see if they love him with all their heart.
The test this time is in the message the prophet gives.
Does it line up with scripture? Does it lead us into truth and following the God of the Bible? Or does it lead us into following after a false god or into error. Some of the greatest
doctrinal heresy today comes from the mouths of those who claim to be prophets. We should test these so-called prophets by examining whether or not what they teach lines up
with the Bible.
“Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world.”
(1 John 4:1)
It is the doctrine that is taught that is the test of the spirit behind the prophet. The Bible warns us that in the last days, many shall be deceived by evil spirits.
“The Spirit clearly says that in the later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits, and things taught by demons.” (1Timothy 4:1)
So then, there are two tests for false prophets. First, a prophet has to be 100% accurate. If they miss even once they are false prophets. Secondly, a prophet must speak according
to sound doctrine. Their message may not contain doctrinal error. It must lead people in the way of truth and after the true God of the Bible.
There are some additional tests that would also help us to differentiate between true and false prophets.
1. A true prophet does not prophesy for fees, charges or payments (2 Kings 5:15, 16).
2. A true prophet does not give his own private interpretation of his or of another true prophet's prophecy: it is always the Lord's exegesis and interpretation, based on what He has
revealed (2 Peter 1:20).
3. A true prophet, with all other things equal, does not prophesy in his own name; it is always in the name of the Lord. (2 Peter 1:21).
4. A true prophet points out the sins, transgressions, and iniquities of the people against God (Isaiah 58:1).
5. A true prophet warns the people of God's coming judgments (Isaiah 24:19-21).
6. A true prophet edifies the church with counsel and advice in religious matters (1 Corinthians 14:3, 4).
7. A true prophet, can be recognized by the results of his or her works (Matthew 7:16-20).
On the other hand a false prophet speaks of peace and prosperity as it is written in Jeremiah 23:16-17, “This is what the LORD says: “Do not listen to what the prophets are
prophesying to you; they fill you will false hopes. They speak visions from their own minds, not from the mouth of the LORD. They keep saying to those despise me, ‘The LORD
says: you will have peace.’ and to all who follow the stubbornness of their hearts they say, No harm will come to you.”
Conclusion
This is the present situation going on at national and international level. The positive use of the gift of prophecy is becoming helpful for the edification of the believers but the
abuse of prophecy is alarming and demands our careful attention concerning the contemporary practice of the gift of prophecy. We should not discourage believers from using this
gift but help them to be alert regarding the abuse of it.
The Application for the Members of the Church in Pakistan Concerning the Gift of Prophecy
Since the beginning of the New Testament church, God has gifted the church with apostle, prophets, teachers, pastors and evangelists (Ephesians 4:11). The purpose of these gifts
was to edify the members of the body of Christ. And this whole process shall continue till the second coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. As we have seen, that the gift of prophecy
strengthens, comforts and encourages the believers (1Corinthians 14:3). It has also the characteristic of convicting the unbelievers about their sins (1Corinthians 14:24-26). The
uniqueness of the gift of prophecy was also stated by the Apostle Paul, (1Corinthians 14:5); because he encourages the believers to be eager to have the gift of prophecy
(V39).
The gift of prophecy is a charisma, which is expresses God’s grace to the members of the body of Christ. And from centuries several people have been blessed by this
multidimensional gift. But some members of the church are denying the continuity of the gift of prophecy. The biblical teachings and history of the church are witness to the
continuity of the gift of prophecy. Since the emergence of the Pentecostals and the Charismatics churches, the misuse of prophecy has undermined the validity of the gift. This
abuse does not mean that the gift of prophecy is not for today’s church.
2. Proper Evaluation
The basic problem of the development of the abuse of prophecy is lack of proper evaluation. There are some Charismatics who ask: how can we evaluate the prophecy of anyone
when it is a matter of the Holy Spirit? We should never forget that the Bible teaches us to evaluate all things. As it is written; “Two or three should prophesy, and others should
weigh carefully what is said” (1 Cor.14:29). The same type of statement of Paul is found in 1Thessalonion.5:20-21; “do not treat prophecies with contempt. Test every thing.
Hold on to the good.” So when someone prophesies, his or her prophecy should be evaluated on the basis of biblical truth. It is essential because the Lord Jesus said in the last
days there would be false prophets. Due to this hazard of false prophets, we need to adopt careful policies for discerning them.
Conclusion
The whole discussion of the topic of the gift prophecy clearly highlights that prophecy has been a prominent subject throughout the Bible. Even the history of the church is not
silent because from the very beginning of the second century, leading bishops like Ignatius, Polycarp, Melito, Teritullian, Spurgeon and many others kept believing in, and holding
to this gift. We also need to have this gift and beware of the false prophets, so that we may preach the gospel more effectively and bring people to Christ and pave the way for His
second coming.
[1] “Charismatic Movement (Greek charismata,” spiritual gifts”), international, interdenominational Christian revivalistic movement, also referred to as Neo-Pentecostalism. The individuals who make up the
movement believe that they have been “filled” or “baptized” with the Holy Spirit through the laying on of hands. The signs of this baptism include such spiritual gifts as speaking in tongues, or glossolalia, prophecy,
healing, interpretation of tongues, and discernment of spirits. This movement is considered to have begun in 1960, with a group of Episcopalians in Van Nuys, California. Distinct charismatic networks and
organizations soon arose within the Baptist, Lutheran, Methodist, Presbyterian, and other Protestant denominations. A small element exists within Eastern Orthodoxy. As has Pentecostalism, the charismatic
movement has produced myriad groups, independent preachers and healers, and a few near-cultic offshoots. Most charismatics, however, are orthodox in doctrine and emphasize activity within their own
denominations. They are ecstatic in worship, although generally more subdued than Pentecostalists, and they align themselves with other Evangelicals in their emphasis on evangelism and personal faith in Christ.”
[2] Wayne A Grudem, New Dictionary of Biblical Theology (Inter Varsity Press, Leicester, England, 2000), P.701
[3]George Mallone, Those Controversial Gifts, IVP, Downers Grove Illinois 60515.1973)p.33
[4] Patrick Fairbairn, Prophecy Viewed In Respect To Its Distinctive Nature, Special Function, And Proper Interpretation, (New York, Nelson & Philips, Cincinnati: Hitchcock & Walden. 1874), P.2
[5] Jack W. Hayford, Hayford’s Bible Handbook, (Thomas Nelson Publication. USA,1996) p.731
[6] William Sanford La Sor, David Allan Hubbard, Frederic William Bush, Old Testament Survey, W B. Eerdmans Publishing Company Grand Rapid: Michigan, 1991) p.305
[7] Siegfriend Grossmann, Stewards of God’s Grace, (The Patnoster Press Ltd: U.K. 1981), p.99
[8]John A. Saliba, Microsoft® Encarta® Reference Library 2003. © 1993-2002 Microsoft Corporation.
[9] http://www.biblestudymanuals.net/prophecytc.htm
[10] Merrill F Unger, Unger’s Bible Dictionary,(Chicago, Moody Press 1960),p.893-4
[11] Edward J. Young , My Servant The Prophets, (WM. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company ,Grand Rapid: Michigan, 1952), P.13
[12] Robert Rendail, History, Prophecy And God,( The Paternoster Press, London,1954), P.65
[13] Edward J.Young, P.35
[14] http://www.biblestudymanuals.net/prophecytc.htm
[15] Merrill F. Unger, Unger’s Bible Dictionary , (Moody Press : Chicago, 1960), P.893
[16]Don Fleming, Word’s Bible Dictionary, (World Publishing Grand Rapids,Michigan49418 U.S.A,1990), p.354
[17] Merrill F. Unger, P.893
[18] http://www.biblestudymanuals.net/prophecytc.htm
[19]13 Jakob Jocz, Marshall Pickering Encyclopedia of the Bible (Vol.2) Marshall Pickering : London 1990), P. 1760
[20] John Howard Raven, Old Testament Introduction (Fleming H. Revell Company: London 1910), p.183
[21] George Mallone,p.34
[22] J. I. Packer, God Has Spoken, Hodder and Stoughton: 1965),P.44
[23] IBID.p.44
[24] Wahne A Grudem, New Dictionary of Biblical Theology (Inter Varsity Press, Leicester, England, 2000), P.704
[25] J.P. Baker , New Bible Dictionary , (Inter Varsity Press, Leicester, England, 1997), p.967
[26]C. E. Schenk, International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, (Vol.8). AGES Software Albany, OR USA
Version 1.0 © 1996 P.835
[27] Edward J. Young, p.86
[28] Ibid, p.93
[29] Ibid, p.94
[30] J A. Motyer, New Bible Dictionary, (IVP, Leicester, England, 1986), p.980
[31] Grudem,p.704
[32] Maccabees are part of the Old Testament for Roman Catholics Bible but Protestants consider them Apocryphal books.
[33] Antiochus Epiphanes, Seleucid king of the Hellenistic Syrian kingdom who reigned from 175 to 164 BC. His attempts to suppress Judaism brought on the Wars of the Maccabees. But under the leadership of
the Jewish priest Mattathias (died c. 167 bc) and his sons, the Maccabees, the Jews revolted (168-160 bc) and drove Antiochus from Jerusalem. Microsoft ® Encarta ® Reference Library 2003. © 1993-2002
Microsoft Corporation
[37] Michael Green, I Believe in The Holy Spirit (Hodder & Stoughton: London) p.194
[38] David Prior, p.196
[39] Pentecost (Greek pentēcostē, “fiftieth”), in Christianity, a festival observed on the seventh Sunday (50th day) after Easter, commemorating the descent of the Holy Spirit on the Apostles as they celebrated the
ancient Jewish feast of Shabuoth (Acts 2:1-4). Encarta® Reference Library 2003.CD Rom
[40] Richard B. Hays, Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching, First Corinthians, (John Knox Press Louisville, Kentucky: USA, 1997)p.212-3
[41] Ibid,p.234-5
[42] Francis D. Nichol, Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary Vol.6,(Review And Herald Publishing Association: USA)p.788
[43] The gift is, in any case, intended for the edification of the whole church, not so much of an individual Christian what is called by many today ‘person prophecy’ is highly suspected, (David Prior, The
Message of 1 Corinthians, IVP, Leicester: England, 1997)p.243
[44] Wayne Grudem, The Gift of Prophecy In The New Testament And Today, (Kingsway Publications Eastbourne: UK,1988)p.151
[45]Encouragement means to give support, confidence, or hope to or help or stimulate the development.
[46] Exhortation is an address or communication emphatically urging someone to do something
[47] Grudem, The Gift of Prophecy,p.151
[48] David Prior,p.243
[49] David k.Lowery, The Bible knowledge commentary, (Victor Books: 1989), p.588
[50] Michael Green, To Corinthians With Love, (Hodder & Stoughton, 1989)p.76
[51] David Prior,p.243
[52] William Barclay, The Letters to the Corinthians, (The Daily Study Bible; The Saint Andrew Press, 1954)p.144
[53] 1. For the church
ii] Encouragement, 1Cor.14:3. To help Christians stand firm through times of trouble.
v] Instruction, 1Cor.14:31.
i] Convict;
[64] Dr. F D. Farnell graduated in 1980 from Dallas Theological Seminary where he completed his doctoral dissertation on the subject "New Testament Prophecy: Its Nature and Duration," in which he tried to
explain that the gift of prophecy ceased within the apostolic age.
[65] Wayne Grudem is professor of Biblical and Systematic Theology at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, USA. He is the author of several books. In his doctoral dissertation he asserted that the gift of prophecy
is still present in the church but in a less authoritative form.
[66] Canon: The Canon of the New Testament was recognized by an assembly of church officials in Rome in 382 and Carthage in 397. In the first edition of Luther's Bible, published in 1534, and in subsequent
Protestant Bibles, any books of the original Christian Canon that were not present in the original Old Testament were relegated to a separate place between the Old and New Testaments. After 1826, English
publication of these books, known as Apocrypha, almost entirely ceased in Protestant bibles. Microsoft ® Encarta® Reference Library 2003
[67] C.C. Ryrie, The Holy Spirit (Chicago: Moody Press, 1965), p.86
[68] John F. Walvoord, The Holy Spirit (Wheaton, Ill.: Van Kampen Press,1954), p.179
[69] John F. MacArthur, jr. Charismatic Chaos (Grand Rapids: Michigan, Zondervan Publishing House, 1992), p.99-100
[70] Montanism, also called Cataphrygian heresy , or New Prophecy a heretical movement founded by the prophet Montanus that arose in the Christian church in Phrygia, Asia Minor, in the 2nd century.
Subsequently it flourished in the West, principally in Carthage under the leadership of Tertullian in the 3rd century. It had almost died out in the 5\th and 6th centuries, although some evidence indicates that it
survived into the 9th century. (Encyclopedia Britannica, Deluxe Edition CD-Rom, 2004)
[71] Earle E. Cairns, Christianity Through the Centuries ( Grand Rapids: Michigan, Zondervan Publishing House, 1954), p.110-111
[72] Teleion
[73] Kenneth Barker (Ed) The NIV Study Bible (Grand Rapids, MI 49530, Zondervan Publishing House, 1995), p.1754
[74] George Mallone, p.17
[75] David Prior, p.233-4
[76] D. A. Carson. Showing the Spirit, p.68
[77] Wayne Grudem, The Gift of Prophecy…, p.122
[78] http://www.biblestudymanuals.net/prophecytc.htm
[79] George Mallone, p.18
[80] John R. W. Stott The Message of Ephesians (Leicester, Inter Varsity Press, 1997), p.106-7
[81] Ibid, p.107
[82] “I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book; If anyone man adds anything to them, God will add to him the plagues describes in this book. And if anyone takes words away from this
book of this prophecy, God will take away from him his share in the tree of life, and in the holy city, which are described in this book.” (NIV)
was widely regarded as a canonical book of the Bible until the 4th century. (Microsoft ® Encarta ® Reference Library 2003)
Lord would help them also if they were willing to repent and forgive as the Forests had done. Twelve couples rose and came to the alter of the church to receive prayer, to repent, and to forgive each other. As far as
Carl knows, all twelve of these marriages are doing well. [Jack Deere, Surprised by the Power of the Spirit, (Grand Rapids: Michigan, Zondervan Publishing House, 1996),p.209-212]
[116] Jack Deere, Surprised by the Power of the Spirit, (Grand Rapids: Michigan, Zondervan Publishing House, 1996),p.209-212
[117] Ralph & Gretchen Mahoney, (Ed). Understanding the Prophetic in the Church Toady, ( ACTS International Edition, Apirl/May/June/2001),p.18
[118] http://www.letusreason.org/support.htm
[119] http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/hinnflier.html
[120] http://www.pawcreek.org/articles/endtimes/CultOfBennyHinn.htm
[121] Personal conversation with Rev. Hezekial Saroosh at his house on 20-11-2004
[122] Personal conversation with Rev. Philip Dutt at his house on 17-11-2004
[123] Ibid…
[124] Personal conversation with Rev. Hezekial Saroosh at his house on 20-11-2004
[125] Ibid…
[126] Personal Conversation with a class fellow …..
[127] Michael Harper, These Wonderful Gifts, (Hodder & Stoughton: London, 1989), p.77
[128] Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology, (IVP, Leister: England, 1998), p.1060
Bibliography
v Baker J. P., New Bible Dictionary, Leicester, England, Inter Varsity Press, 1997
v Baker, Kenneth, The NIV Study Bible, , Grand Rapids, Zondervan Publishing
House MI USA, 1995
v Bakhsh, Danial. Final Victory Over Satan, Comprehensive Exposition of the
Revelation, S. N. Printers, Pakistan: 2002
v Barclay, William, The Letters to the Corinthians, The Daily Study Bible; The Saint
Andrew Press, 1954
v Barker, Kenneth (Ed), The NIV Study Bible, Grand Rapids, MI 49530, Zondervan
Publishing House, 1995
v Cairns, Earle E. Christianity Through the Centuries, Grand Rapids: Michigan,
Zondervan Publishing House, 1954
v Carson, D A, Showing The Spirit, Paternoster Press, 1988
v Deere, Jack Surprised by the Voice of God, Easrbourne: Kingsway Publications,
1997
v Deere, Jack. Surprised by the Power of the Spirit, Grand Rapids: Michigan,
Zondervan Publishing House, 1996
v Dutt, Philips. An Interview, on the subject of prophecy in Gujranwala on 17-11-
2004
v Elwell, Walter, Marshall Pickering Encyclopedia of the Bible (Vol.2) Marshall
Pickering: London, 1990
v Erickson, Millard J. Christian Theology, Grand Rapids: Michigan, Baker Books,
1995
v Encyclopedia Britannica Deluxe Edition CD- ROM, 2004
v Fairbairn, Patrick, Prophecy Viewed In Respect To Its Distinctive Nature, Special
Function, And Proper Interpretation, New York, Nelson & Philips, Cincinnati: Hitchcock
& Walden. 1874
v Fleming, Don, Word’s Bible Dictionary, World Publishing Grand Rapids, Michigan
49418 U.S.A, 1990
v Giles, K. N. Dictionary of New Testament and Its Developments, Downers Grove,
Illinois 60515, Leicester: England, Inter Varsity Press, 1997
v Green, Michael, Evangelism in the Early Church, Grand Rapids, Michigan:
Eerdmans, 1970
v Green, Michael, I Believe in The Holy Spirit, Hodder & Stoughton: London, 1960
v Green, Michael, To Corinthians With Love, Hodder & Stoughton, 1989
v Grudem, Wayne A, New Dictionary of Biblical Theology, Inter Varsity Press,
Leicester, England, 2000
v Grudem, Wayne, The Gift of Prophecy in the New Testament And Today,
Kingsway Publications Eastbourne: UK, 1988
v Grudem, Wayne. Systematic Theology, IVP, Leicester, UK, 1994
v Grudem, Wayne. The Vineyard’s Response to the Standard
v Harlow, R.E. 1Corinthians The Imperfect Church Everyday Publications Inc.1986
v Harper, Michael. As at the Beginning, London: Hodder &Stoughton, 1965
v Harper, Michael. Prophecy: A Gift for the body of Christ (Logos Microsoft, 1964
v Harper, Michael. These Wonderful Gifts, Hodder & Stoughton: London, 1989
v http://www.biblestudymanuals.net/prophecytc.htm
v http://www.wollongong.apana.org.au/~fin/holyspirit5.html
v http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/hinnflier.html
v http://www.letusreason.org/support.htm
v http://www.pawcreek.org/articles/endtimes/CultOfBennyHinn.htm
v Hayford, Jack W, Hayford’s Bible Handbook, Thomas Nelson Publication, USA,
1996
v Hays, Richard B, Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching,
First Corinthians, John Knox Press Louisville, Kentucky: USA, 1997
v Hodge, Charles, The First Epistle to the Corinthians, The Banner of Truth Trust,
London, 1959
v Knox, John. History of the Reformation, Vol.1, (Ed) William Croft Dickinson, New
York: Philosophical Library, 1950
v Lowery, David k., The Bible knowledge commentary, Victor Books: A Division of
Scriptures Press Publications, 1989
v MacArthur, John F. jr. Charismatic Chaos, Grand Rapids: Michigan, Zondervan
Publishing House, 1992
v Mallone, George, Those Controversial Gifts, IVP, Downers Grove Illinois
60515.1973
v Microsoft ® Encarta ® Reference Library 2003. © 1993-2002 Microsoft
Corporation.
v Morris, Leon, 1Corinthians, IVP, Leister, England, 1995
v Nichol, Francis D, Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary Vol.6, Review and
Herald Publishing Association: USA, 1994
v Packer, J I, God Has Spoken, Hodder and Stoughton: 1965
v Packer, J I. Keep in Step with the Spirit, Leicester: IVP, 1984
v Patton, Bill. The Purpose & the Governance of the Gift of Prophecy, 2001 PDI
Worship Leaders Conference Copyright 2001 PDI Ministries, 7881 Beechcraft Ave,
Suite B, Gaithersburg, MD 208791
v Prior, David, The Message of 1 Corinthians IVP, Leicester, England, 1997
v Pytches, D. Prophecy in the Local Church, London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1993
v Richardson, Andy on the subject of The Gift Prophecy (html)
v Raven, John Howard, Old Testament Introduction, Fleming H. Revell Company:
London 1910
v Rendail, Robert. History, Prophecy And God, The Paternoster Press, London,
1954
v Ralph & Gretchen Mahoney (Ed), Understanding the Prophetic in the Church
Toady, Acts International Edition, Apirl/May/June/2001
v Ryrie, C.C. The Holy Spirit, Chicago: Moody Press, 1965
v Schenk, C. E., International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, (Vol.8). AGES Software
Albany, OR USA
v Saroosh, Hezekila. An Interview, on the subject of prophecy on 20-11-2004 in
Lahore
v Smith, David L. A Handbook of Contemporary Theology, Grand Rapids: Michigan,
Baker Books, 1992
v Stott, John R. W. The Message of Ephesians, Leicester, Inter Varsity Press, 1997
v Unger, Merrill F Unger’s Bible Dictionary, Chicago, Moody Press 1960
v Walvoord, John F. The Holy Spirit, Wheaton, Ill.: Van Kampen Press, 1954
v William Sanford La Sor, David Allan Hubbard, Frederic William Bush, Old
Testament Survey, W B. Eerdmans Publishing Company Grand Rapid: Michigan, 1991
v Wimber, John. Power Evangelism, London: Hodder, 1985
v Young, Edward J, My Servant The Prophets, WM. B. Eerdmans Publishing
Company, Grand Rapid: Michigan, 1952
v Ziai, Aslam. Understanding the Bible, Article which was delivered on May 8, 2004
at Christian Study Center 126-Murree Road Rawalpindi
Bible Translations
v The NIV Study Bible, Grand Rapids, Zondervan Publishing House MI USA, 1995
v King James Version, Age Software Albany, OR 97321