Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

WATER

Renew America’s Water


Why California Needs Federal Investment in Public Water to
Provide Safe Water for Generations to Come
Fact Sheet • October 2010

C alifornia’s public water systems have provided reliable access to drinking water
and safe disposal of wastewater for decades, yet a crisis looms. When Congress
passed the Clean Water Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act to ensure that our
waterways were protected and our drinking water safe, they provided increased
funding for community water systems to meet these more protective standards.
However, since the 1980s, the federal government has been cutting back funding to
communities for water infrastructure, with assistance falling to historic lows under
the Bush administration. At the same time, many of our nation’s water systems that
were built in the early 20th century are reaching the end of their lifespan. Without
dedicated federal funding, communities simply cannot afford to make the necessary
repairs to pipes and water systems that keep our waters clean and safe. This lack of
investment in communities’ water infrastructure poses a danger to the environment
and threatens the safety of our water for future generations.

The campaign to Renew America’s Water will create a As a result, even after state contributions, state revolving
dedicated source of federal funding, which will improve funds fall $27 billion short of what is needed to maintain
water quality, protect the environment, create good jobs California’s water and sewer systems, leaving local govern-
and ensure safe, reliable water for generations to come. ments with much of the financial burden. Additional fund-
ing is necessary to maintain and improve the state’s water
quality. We need to act now to Renew America’s Water and
Reliable Access to Safe Water Is close this funding gap.
Threatened
California’s drinking water and sewer infrastructure needs Protecting Our Beaches, Rivers and
dramatically outpace available funding. According to
California’s latest project priority list for the Drinking Water
Lakes
State Revolving Fund (SRF) program, the state’s public Aging water infrastructure does more than threaten our
water systems need $11.1 billion to keep our water safe.1 future access to reliable drinking water — it also harms the
In 2010, the state’s Drinking Water State Revolving Fund environment in our communities. Aging sewer pipes can
program, which provides low-interest loans and grants burst and spill untreated waste into our rivers, lakes and
to maintain safe drinking water, received $127 million in streams. This is a problem in communities across the state.
federal funding — enough to finance only 1.1 percent of According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s
what is needed.2 California 2006 Water Quality Assessment Report, 93 per-
cent of the state’s river miles, 93 percent of its lake waters,
California’s publicly owned wastewater systems need and 98 percent of the bays and estuaries assessed were im-
$16.5 billion to protect water quality and public health.3 paired and too polluted to support their designated uses.5
In 2010, the state’s Clean Water State Revolving Fund
program, which goes toward wastewater infrastructure, Sewage overflows and stormwater runoff can also cause
received $147 million in federal funding — enough to waters to be unfit for recreational use. California had 714
finance less than 1 percent of what is needed.4 closures and advisories at beaches in 2009.6 In addition,
analysis of beach monitoring data showed that 8 percent state and municipal governments, create hundreds of thou-
of samples in California exceeded national health stan- sands of good jobs, and ensure universal access to clean
dards. In other words, the contamination could make drinking water for generations to come.
beachgoers sick.7

Furthermore, leaks in our aging pipes lose water, even in


Take Action
parts of the country facing water shortages. According to • Get involved in the campaign to Renew America’s Wa-
the U.S. Geological Survey, 1.7 trillion gallons of water are ter. Visit us at www.foodandwaterwatch.org/renew to:
lost from distribution to consumer taps — equivalent to
one out of every five gallons of drinking water.8 • Sign the petition and endorse the campaign

Increased investment in water and sewer systems will bet- • Join our team of activists who blog or write letters to
ter protect our rivers, lakes, bays and beaches and reduce the editor about the campaign
loss of treated drinking water through leaky pipes.
• Host a house party movie screening about our water
needs
Creating Quality Jobs and Investing in
Our Future • Find out more ways to get involved
Renewing America’s Water will not just provide universal
access to water and an improved environment — it will
also create hundreds of thousands of quality jobs at a time Endnotes
when our communities need it most. California’s unem-
1 California Department of Public Health. “Safe Drinking Water State
ployment rate continues to hover around 12.4 percent with Revolving Fund - September 2010 Final State Revolving Fund Project
2,261,500 people out of work.9 Priority List.” September 2010
2 United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.
“Distribution of Drinking Water SRF Appropriation. 2010 DWSRF Al-
According to the Clean Water Council, for every $1 bil- lotment based on 2007 SWINSA Results.” September 15, 2010.
lion spent on water infrastructure in California, 12,390 to 3 California Department of Public Health, Division of Financial As-
19,574 jobs are created.10 Fully addressing the state’s an- sistance. “State of California Revolving Fund CWSRF Program - State
Fiscal Year 2010/2011 Project Priority List.”
nual water funding shortfall would generate up to 535,091 4 FY 2010 Clean Water State Revolving Fund Title VI Allotments. January
employment opportunities not only in the water sector 15, 2010.
5 United States Environmental Protection Agency, Watershed Assess-
but throughout the local economies that benefit from the ment, Tracking & Environmental Results. “California 2004 Water Qual-
increased employment. Therefore, every federal dollar in- ity Assessment Report Assessed Waters of California by Watershed.”
vested in infrastructure yields a $1.59 return to our states.11 Available at: http://iaspub.epa.gov/waters10/w305b_report_control.
get_report?p_state=CA&p_cycle=
That could put nearly one out of every four unemployed 6 Dorfman, Mark and Kristen Sinclair Rosselot. National Resources
people in the state back to work.12 Water and sewer infra- Defense Council “Testing the Waters 2010: A Guide to Water Quality
structure jobs are typically filled locally, and investing now at Vacation Beaches.” National Resources Defense Council. 2010 at
CA.3.
in water and sewer systems can generate solid economic 7 Dorfman, Mark and Kristen Sinclair Rosselot. National Resources
growth and bring jobs into our communities. Defense Council “Testing the Waters 2010: A Guide to Water Quality
at Vacation Beaches.” National Resources Defense Council. 2010 at
CA.1.
Fixing Water Infrastructure in Schools 8 US Environmental Protection Agency. Water Research Adaptation Pro-
gram: Research Areas. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/wswrd/
wqm/wrap/research.html. Accessed on September 1, 2010.
Schools across California have outdated water pipes and 9 United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
drinking fountains that have fallen into disrepair. As a Economy at a Glance: California. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/eag/
result, children do not have access to safe drinking water eag.ca.htm, accessed September 23, 2010.
10 PA Consulting Group. Clean Water Council. “Sudden impact: An
at school. Currently, there is no federal funding devoted to assessment of short-term economic impacts of water and wastewater
updating and repairing drinking water systems in schools. construction projects in the United States.” June 8, 2009 at 12.
The campaign to Renew America’s Water would provide 11 Schwartz, Bernard L. and Schwenninger, Sherle R. “A Public Infra-
structure–-Led Economic Recovery Program.” December 4, 2008;
grants to schools to make the repairs needed to provide Zandi, Mark. Chief economist and co-founder, Moody’s Economy.com.
safe, affordable tap water to students. Testimony on Economic Stimulus For Small Business: A Look Back and
Assessing Need For Additional Relief. U.S. House Committee on Small
Business. July 24, 2008.
It’s Time to Renew America’s Water 12 Food & Water Watch Calculation: 19,574 x 27.33681= 535,091;
535,091/2,261,500 = 23.66% or nearly one in four
To Renew America’s Water, we need a comprehensive,
long-term solution that fully funds our water infrastruc-
ture needs. Funds must be dedicated for this purpose and For more information:
protected from yearly political decisions. Legislation to web: www.foodandwaterwatch.org
Renew America’s Water must include funds to assist rural email: info@fwwatch.org
and low-income communities, help large municipalities, phone: (202) 683-2500 (DC) • (415) 293-9900 (CA)
and provide grants to improve water access in our public
schools. Such an investment would relieve overburdened Copyright © October 2010 Food & Water Watch

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen