Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1. Descriptive,
2. Performance,
3. Reference Standards, and
4. Proprietary.
For a discussion of the four methods, see CSI Manual of Practice, Part II- Specification
Writing Techniques, Chapter 2, Methods of Specifying.
The University has elected to follow Section 3400 of the Public Contract Code which
requires the use of nonrestrictive (open) specifications. Nonrestrictive specifications use
one or more of the four methods written in such a manner as to make the specification
“open.”
Examples and discussion of the four specification methods and their nonrestrictive
specifying application follow.
Ex: Sand: Clean, washed, sharp, durable natural particles, free from soluble salts or
organic impurities. Sand for grouting shall be screened to pass a 30 mesh sieve
with not more than 5% passing a 100 mesh screen. The above descriptive
specification is “open.” However, a descriptive specification drafted to limit the
product choice to one brand or a limited number of brands is “closed.” Simply
copying a manufacturer’s descriptive specification would probably produce a
“closed” descriptive specification.
2. Performance specifications set forth the ends to be achieved, not the means of
achieving the desired result.
Ex: Exhaust fan performance. Capacity of 500 CFM against a static pressure of 0.5
inches of water column. This type of specification is “closed” when the specifier
uses the performance standards of a single manufacturer and no one else can
meet those standards.
Ex: Portland Cement: Conform to ASTM C150, Type I or Type II, low alkali.
Maximum total alkali shall not exceed 0.6 percent. This type of specification is
“closed” when some requirement of a standard limits competition by
referencing certain subcontractors or manufacturers.
Proprietary specifications can be made “open” by adding the phrase “or equal”
as described in paragraph 5 - Nonrestrictive specifications.
5. Nonrestrictive specifications are “open” specifications; the type required by the Code.
Descriptive, Proprietary, Reference Standards or Performance Specifications or
combinations of such methods, are written in such a manner as not to limit
competition.
Ex: Globe Valves: All bronze, union bonnet, Walworth No. 95 or 96; Kennedy
Fig. 89 or 90; Crane No. 7 or 17, or equal.
Ex: Waterproof Glue: Polyvinyl acetate emulsion with 55% solids. “Wilhold”
manufactured by Acorn Adhesives; “Weldwood” manufactured by U.S.
Plywood; or equal.
(1) At least two brand names of comparable quality or utility must be listed.
(2) Specifiers may use a format listing two brand names with only one model
number.
(a) The bidders are informed of only one brand that they know will be
accepted.
(b) The second named brands’ model must be determined by the bidder
and approved by the Owner’s Representative after the contract is let.
Studies have shown the bidder will usually select the first brand; thus
competition is reduced and the bid may be increased.
(c) Since the Owner’s Representative has to approve the second brand,
time delays may result.
(d) After award, the Owner’s Representative may have trouble requiring
the Owner’s Representative’s choice of a certain model number for
the second brand to be used.
(3) The Facilities Manual clearly explains the exceptions to specifying two
brands (Volume 4, Chapter 1). However, there seems to be much
confusion over these exceptions. The following explanation should help.
(a) Naming only one brand followed by “or equal” is permissible if the
specifier knows of only one brand that will satisfy the use. The
phrase, “No known equal” should follow the specification.
(b) Naming only one brand not followed by “or equal” is allowed only
under the following circumstances.
An easy way to determine the valid use of items (a), (b)1), (b)2), or (b)3)
is to ask yourself the questions:
Ex: Door louvers shall be aluminum Type NL-138 with push frame
both sides of door, primed finish, as manufactured by
Construction Specialties, Inc., Aerolite, Co., or equal.