Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Keywords
energy efficiency, software for pneumatic system design, suction cups, vacuum
1. Introduction
The aim of the efficient pneumatic system development is to provide the minimum loss
of pressure in the distributive system. Inefficient pneumatic system could cause
increasing costs per unit of compressed air, unsuitable and unbalanced operation of
pneumatic equipment, decreasing life cycle of components, reducing capacity and
forming rust and sludge in the main and the lateral ducts. [1]
It is well known that pneumatic systems spend a significant energy for their operation.
According to some researches 10% of all electric energy which is used in industry, is
used for making the compressed air. For this reason it is necessary to pay attention on
their efficient work. By making the pneumatic system more efficient we can save
energy, extend life time of the pneumatic equipment, make whole system more reliable
and decrease the costs of working period of the system. [2]
The main objective of this contribution is to call attention of developers and all firms
which use suction cups in their processes on energy saving. There are a lot of
possibilities to implement different solutions. In the next chapters the possibilities of
increasing the energy efficiency in suction cups applications will be presented.
One of the possible methods for increasing energy efficiency in suction cups
applications is with equipment for that purpose manufactured. Air saving is realized
with a vacuum generators. They have an integrated vacuum switch with an air saving
function. It is well known as Air saving circuit.
It is integrated part of vacuum generators and it comes from manufacturers of
pneumatic equipment. Its function principle is: the vacuum range to be used to hold the
workpiece is set on the vacuum switch. The switch generates a pulsating signal which
actuates the solenoid valves for vacuum when the vacuum pressure has fallen below the
selected upper limit value (due to leakage etc.). At all other times, the vacuum is
maintained with the non-return valve, even when the vacuum generator is not switched
on. [4] We will compare work of vacuum generator and work of vacuum pump. That
will be presented on the example. Also on the same example we will see the principle
of energy efficiency achievement.
On the Figure 1 are presented working curves of vacuum pump and vacuum generator
with integrated air saving function. We can see that vacuum generator switches off
when it reaches vacuum value which is demanded. That means that vacuum generator
does not generate vacuum while is vacuum on the demanded level. When vacuum falls
down bellow demanded level vacuum generator will switch on and continue with
vacuum generation until he reaches demanded level. During the period while vacuum
generator is switched off it does not spend compressed air for vacuum generation.
If we have on mind that vacuum producing in that manner is expensive and that suction
cups are great consumers of pressurised air, option air saving could lead to increasing
energy efficiency of the system. With the air saving circuit we can use vacuum more
rational because it is not necessary to produce vacuum during the whole period when
suction cups are engaged. Vacuum will be generated only when it falls down bellow
demanded level which is indispensable for successful realisation of assignment
(catching and replacing the workpiece).
Air savings is in proportion to participation of time Δt from Figure 1 in total holding
time of workpiece. This solution is especially suitable in applications in which
particular holding time of workpiece significant takes part in total material handling
cycle.
The great advantage of vacuum selection programs is that they automatically generate
diagrams on which we can see how the concrete parameters of our system work, e.g. air
consumption, suction capacity, vacuum etc. If we change some of those parameters we
can see the effects which they cause on those diagrams. In accordance with obtained
diagrams we can take actions in order to increase energy efficiency of the system. This
procedure will be presented on example.
We have cylindrical (z axis) workpiece with dimensions: diameter 150 mm and height
40 mm and mass 200 g. In this vacuum application we will use 6 suction cups, standard
shape and diameter 30 mm. Suction cups are in circular (circumference) positioning.
Working pressure is 6 bars. Three vacuum generators are supplied suction cups with
necessary quantity and value of vacuum. After defining those parameters in vacuum
selection program we will obtain diagrams which are presented on Figure 2.
We can see that the biggest value of vacuum is in situation when working pressure is
5,4 bars. If we change the working pressure from origin 6 bars to 5,4 bars we will
obtain diagrams like on Figure 3.
Figure 3 Vacuum values for working pressure 5,4 bars
When we change the working pressure vacuum and suction capacity will be used on the
most effective way. In the case when the working pressure is 6 bars we have air
consumption 27,60 litres per minute and in the case when the working pressure is 5,4
bars, 23,28 litres per minute. In this manner we can save 4,32 litres per minute of air or
0,072 litres per second. In some longer period air savings could be significant. The
importance of that will be illustrated on example from real process.
If suction cups work 30 seconds every minute, 8 hours per day, 250 days per annum,
we have total working time 60.000 minutes per annum or 259.200 litres per annum
pressurised air savings. This is savings while just one suction cup works on one
working operation. But this situation is very rare in real processes so the total air
savings is much, much bigger.
5. Conclusion
Rapid development of IT lead to massed usage of engineering tool as a support in
suction cups applications. In the present developers of pneumatic systems could use
software to help them to choose equipment and develop pneumatic systems. Those
software have integrated mechanisms for calculating all necessary parameters of the
system. Also they save time and effort to developers and the possibilities of making
mistakes are less.
From increasing energy efficiency of vacuum applications using engineering tools point
of view we can conclude that there are a lot of economical and technical potentials for
energy saving in this field. It is enabled by:
• choosing intended equipment manufactured for that purpose which increases
energy efficiency and/or
• optimisation of working parameters of pneumatic system on the basis of
simulation in exploitation conditions.
References
[1] Šešlija D., Lagod B., “Condition of pneumatic systems in Serbian industry from
aspect of energy efficiency”, Centre for automation and mechatronics, Novi Sad,
2006.
[2] Šešlija D., “Production, preparing and distribution of air pressure”, IKOS, Novi
Sad, 2002.
[3] Ignjatović I., “Usage of the Engineering Tools in Pneumatics Systems
Development”, Master thesis, FTN, Novi Sad, 2006.
[4] FESTO AG & Co. KG, “The Pneumatic Catalogue 2004”, Esslingen (Berkheim),
2004.