Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Let is a genuine number and simultaneously, inverse dataset. In the first place, the information was made
arrangements are created from which the best one is to go through pre-handling stage in which the
picked by looking at introductory and inverse missing qualities were cleared and afterward the ideal
arrangements [54-60]. highlights were chosen by the proposed OFFO
calculation. The dataset was then grouped into two
~
Fj = m j + n j − Fj classes, for example, class 1 and class 2 dependent on
the chose best subset of highlights i.e., presence of
(2) CKD and nonattendance of CKD separately. For this
Target Function: characterization, the DNN calculation was actualized
since it is the most suitable technique for information
The new arrangement position moved when the order.
higher engaging quality worth delivered by the new
position. Else, the current position stayed by firefly. REFERENCES
The target capacity of the proposed work is [1] Feng, Y., Yi, J. H., & Wang, G. G. (2019).
communicated in the condition (3). Enhanced Moth Search Algorithm for the Set-
Union Knapsack Problems. IEEE Access, 7,
Target Function = Optimal (highlights)
173774-173785.
(6.3) [2] Sivaram, M., Batri, K., Amin Salih, M.,
&Porkodi, V. (2019). Exploiting the Local
IV. RESULT AND DISCUSSION Optima in Genetic Algorithm using Tabu
Search. Indian Journal of Science and
Table 1 clarifies the reenactment results of highlight Technology, 12(1), 1-13.
determination calculations, for example, FireFly [3] Venkatraman, S., &Surendiran, B. (2020).
Optimization Algorithm (FOA), Genetic Algorithm Adaptive hybrid intrusion detection system for
(GA), Monarch Butterfly Optimization (MBO) and crowd sourced multimedia internet of things
the proposed OFFO calculation. For various number systems. Multimedia Tools and
of highlights in the considered CKD dataset, the Applications, 79(5), 3993-4010.
exactness of various calculations like the proposed [4] Sujitha, B., Parvathy, V. S., Lydia, E. L., Rani,
OFFO, MBO, GA and FOA are displayed in the P., Polkowski, Z., & Shankar, K. (2020).
figure 1. By utilizing these calculations, the exactness Optimal deep learning based image
was determined and evaluated dependent on the compression technique for data transmission
highlights. The precision was examined for various on industrial Internet of things
capabilities in the scope of 10 to 60 [60-68]. When applications. Transactions on Emerging
thought about toothefeature choice calculations, the Telecommunications Technologies, e3976.
OFFO model yielded high precision on CKD [5] Ezhilarasu, P., Krishnaraj, N., &Dhiyanesh, B.
information base. Records normal in overabundance (2015). Arithmetic Coding for Lossless Data
of every one of the 10 runs exhibition. For all Compression–A Review. International Journal
calculations, the preparation and test sets for of Computer Science Trends and
reasonable correlation between include choice Technology, 3(3).
calculations. [6] Porkodi, V., Singh, A. R., Sait, A. R. W.,
Table 1: CKD prediction Performance analysis Shankar, K., Yang, E., Seo, C., & Joshi, G. P.
(2020). Resource Provisioning for Cyber–
Performance Physical–Social System in Cloud-Fog-Edge
OFFO FOA MBO GA
Metrics Computing Using Optimal Flower Pollination
Accuracy (%) 97.89 89.52 86.22 76.25 Algorithm. IEEE Access, 8, 105311-105319.
[7] Gao, D., Wang, G. G., &Pedrycz, W. (2020).
Sensitivity (%) 96.58 91.55 83.22 75.52 Solving fuzzy job-shop scheduling problem
using DE algorithm improved by a selection
Specificity (%) 93.23 87.12 87.45 84.22 mechanism. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy
Systems.
[8] Sivaram, M., Mohammed, A. S., Yuvaraj, D.,
V. CONCLUSION Porkodi, V., Manikandan, V., &Yuvaraj, N.
(2019, February). Advanced expert system
The basic issue in clinical information grouping is the using particle swarm optimization based
assessment of the best subset of highlights from adaptive network based fuzzy inference
various credits present in the considered CKD system to diagnose the physical constitution of
Communication Network and Evaluating [59] Mohammed, A. S., Kareem, S. W., Al Azzawi,
Connectivity Among IP Networks. Asian A. K., & Sivaram, M. (2018). Time series
Journal of Applied Science and Technology prediction using SRE-NAR and SRE-
(AJAST), 1(3), 319-322. ADALINE. Journal of Advanced Research in
[50] Elhoseny, M., Rajan, R. S., Hammoudeh, M., Dynamical and Control Systems, Pages, 1716-
Shankar, K., &Aldabbas, O. (2020). Swarm 1726.
intelligence–based energy efficient clustering [60] Shankar, K., Elhoseny, M., Chelvi, E. D.,
with multihop routing protocol for sustainable Lakshmanaprabu, S. K., & Wu, W. (2018). An
wireless sensor networks. International Journal efficient optimal key based chaos function for
of Distributed Sensor Networks, 16(9), medical image security. IEEE Access, 6,
1550147720949133. 77145-77154.
[51] Chu, H. C., Wang, G. G., & Park, J. H. (2015). [61] Geerthik, S., Gandhi, R., &Venkatraman, S.
The digital fingerprinting analysis concerning (2006). CATEGORY BASED EXPERT
google calendar under ubiquitous mobile RANKING: A NOVEL APPROACH FOR
computing era. Symmetry, 7(2), 383-394. EXPERT IDENTIFICATION IN
[52] Manikandan, V., Sivaram, M., Mohammed, A. COMMUNITY QUESTION ANSWERING.
S., &Porkodi, V. (2020). Nature Inspired [62] Laxmi, C. V., &Somasundaram, K. (2014).
Improved Firefly Algorithm for Node Application Level Scheduling (AppLeS) in
Clustering in WSNs. CMC-COMPUTERS Grid with Quality of Service
MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 64(2), 753- (QoS). International Journal of Grid
776. Computing & Applications, 5(2), 1.
[53] Kuppusamy, P., Venkatraman, S., [63] Kumar, R. S., Krishnaraj, N., &Keerthana, G.
Rishikeshan, C. A., & Reddy, Y. P. (2020). Highly Energy Efficient and Scalable
Deep learning based energy efficient optimal Distributed Clustering Procedure for Dense
timetable rescheduling model for intelligent Wireless Sensor Networks.
metro transportation systems. Physical [64] Krishnaraj, N., Kumar, K. A., & Kumar, P. K.
Communication, 101131. (2018). DESIGN OF ADAPTIVE
[54] Asih, E. S., Nguyen, P. T., Lydia, E. L., SCHEDULER TO IMPROVE
Shankar, K., Hashim, W., &Maseleno, A. PERFORMANCE OF COMPUTATIONAL
(2019). Mobile E-commerce website for GRIDS. International Journal of Pure and
technology-based buying selling Applied Mathematics, 119(18), 1741-1751.
services. International Journal of Engineering [65] Shankar, K., & Eswaran, P. (2016, January). A
and Advanced Technology, 8(6), 884-888. new k out of n secret image sharing scheme in
[55] Lydia, E. L., &Swarup, M. B. (2015). Big data visual cryptography. In 2016 10th
analysis using hadoop components like flume, International Conference on Intelligent
mapreduce, pig and hive. International Journal Systems and Control (ISCO) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
of Science, Engineering and Computer [66] Wei, C. L., & Wang, G. G. (2020). Hybrid
Technology, 5(11), 390. Annealing Krill Herd and Quantum-Behaved
[56] Sengar, S. S., Hariharan, U., &Rajkumar, K. Particle Swarm
(2020, March). Multimodal Biometric Optimization. Mathematics, 8(9), 1403.
Authentication System using Deep Learning [67] Sivaram, M., Yuvaraj, D., Mohammed, A. S.,
Method. In 2020 International Conference on &Porkodi, V. Estimating the Secret Message
Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics in the Digital Image. International Journal of
(ESCI) (pp. 309-312). IEEE. Computer Applications, 975, 8887.
[57] Maseleno, A., Hashim, W., Perumal, E., [68] Nieto, Y., Gacía-Díaz, V., Montenegro, C.,
Ilayaraja, M., & Shankar, K. (2020). Access González, C. C., & Crespo, R. G. (2019).
control and classifier-based blockchain Usage of machine learning for strategic
technology in e-healthcare applications. decision making at higher educational
In Intelligent Data Security Solutions for e- institutions. IEEE Access, 7, 75007-75017.
Health Applications (pp. 151-167). Academic
Press.
[58] Li, J., Lei, H., Alavi, A. H., & Wang, G. G.
(2020). Elephant Herding Optimization:
Variants, Hybrids, and
Applications. Mathematics, 8(9), 1415.