Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Engineering
P R SUBRAMANIAM,
GANDHI INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYUNIVERSITY GUNUPUR, INDIA
Abstract
Today, for the realization of the full success potential of a business, but even more critically for
the survival of a business, developing industries are on the race track to competitors for better
products and in a nutshell, more value for the customer. The importance of ensuring good
quality of its products and services to gain customers, striving to ensure company survival is a
more powerful motive for many companies. Quality engineering solutions an
emerging paradigm is being implemented in the present scenario of developing technologies
in business of emanating industries. Traditional testing and quality control is not enough since a
quality control team is involved at the last stages of production, and its task is to detect defects
in an almost ready product. If some drawbacks are revealed, the product may have to be
redesigned, requiring much time and additional expenses. Such methodology has proven to be
inefficient.
Analysis, management, development and maintenance of different systems in accordance with
high standards, is Quality engineering. The application of this approach in manufacturing or
software development processes ensures the quality of the output by minimizing defects from
the very beginning thus reducing potential losses. It implies that each stage of the product
development cycle is under a rigorous check of quality engineers. Moreover,
quality maintenance is provided long after the product is delivered.
This paper reviews evolving trends and issues focusing on quality engineering. Radical changes
in customer expectation necessitate reform in the technology of design and manufacturing
which is becoming more crucial in satisfying individual customer. This also calls for special
attention to the engineering aspects of quality. Brief reviews on recent improvements in
famous quality tools viz; statistical process control, quality function deployment, and design of
experiment are described. General trends in quality engineering research show the tools are
being enhanced, integrated, computerized and broaden their application bases, where possible
opportunities for further investigation are indicated. Among others these include contributions
in multiple-response optimization, intelligent quality systems, multivariate SPC, and practical
and simple guidelines for actual implementation of various tools.
Introduction
Quality keeps advancing with the application of quality tools and techniques beyond the
traditional approach.
Quality issues are now the concern of all organizations including the services and public sectors.
Quality tools, techniques, concepts and methodologies have been enhanced, to suit new
challenges. Managers often tend to have an overwhelming concern with the management and
conceptual aspects of quality compared to the hard technologies of quality (quality
engineering) despite the latter's tremendous role in ``creating'' quality. Much progress has been
made in quality engineering and this is scattered in various technically publications. The
purpose of this paper is to put quality engineering into perspective and to highlight its
importance, as well as to present some issues in the frontiers of quality engineering.
The paper begins with an overview of quality definitions and evolution of quality paradigms.
This is followed by a comparison of quality management and quality engineering. Advances in
the prominent quality engineering tools and techniques, particularly statistical process control
(SPC), design of experiment (DoE), Taguchi methods and quality function deployment (QFD) are
then presented.
The bottom line of some definitions of Quality by various quality gurus is compiled in Table I
below:
It can be seen from these definitions that quality is an evolving notion. The development in
thought process has been evident, over time, in the various attempts made to define quality
and is seen through the evolution of definitions. We can see it has become a more embracing
entity, more holistic as it embraces not just product quality, but also those elements/ factors
that can impact on quality. Additionally, attention now needs to be paid to all quality
dimensions – not only product quality, but also business quality (including our environmental
and ethical stance) and organisational quality (including our effective and efficient operation).
Attention now needs to be paid to all quality parameters, not only conformance to
specification, but also the quality of design and quality of use. In other words you can have a
great product, but it’s no good if it breaks down shortly after use.
Quality is an ever evolving perception by the customer of the value provided by a product. It is
not a static perception that never changes but a fluid process that changes, as a product
matures (innovation) and other alternatives (competition) are made available as a basis of
comparison. One of the easiest ways to judge the customers' acceptance towards quality is that
a customer look into your eyes and says "WOW!"? "That met the requirements!" or "There
were no defects there!" or "That had all the value I wanted!" or "The degree of excellence was
acceptable!
Figure-1
Professor Noriaki Kano created a Model while studying the contributing factors to customer
satisfaction and customer loyalty as shown in figure-1. His model clearly explains how
requirements and features influence satisfaction.
As per Noori (1993) a quality approach to excellence is ensuring customer delight. The
organization should make the customer feel special and deal with the customer as a matter of
priority rather than as a secondary issue.
Watson defined “service and caring creating customer satisfaction” is quality and the level of
service quality and customer satisfaction is connected to customer perceptions and customer
expectations.
Customer-centric quality is the focus of all the above. Customer centric is a way of doing
business with your customer in a way that provides a positive customer experience before and
after the sale in order to drive repeat business, customer loyalty and profits. On the other hand,
for a poor quality manufacturer, instead of repeat customers, faulty/defective products will
return for repair or replacement.
Quality concepts and tools will be used everywhere in society to improve the quality of
products, services, and life. Basic skills of quality management like process analysis, data
collection and analysis methods, process auditing, and teamwork will be deployed universally.
In addition, some of the advanced quality tools, such as design of experiments, quality function
deployment, and failure mode effects analysis, will be used by professionals in many other
fields. Business professionals to be active in the future must apply the skills in strategic business
opportunities to higher-level projects and take a leap using the tools in that direction, for
communication, strategic thinking, information retrieval, and interpersonal skills preparing to
wield digital hammers and use electronic nails the tools of the shrinking global marketplace
now.
Many of the commonly used key terms pertaining to quality are quality control (QC), quality assurance
(QA), statistical quality control (SQC), total quality control (TQC) and total quality management (TQM).
Quality Assurance is a proactive process and is prevention in nature whereas Quality Control is a reactive
process and is detection in nature. Minimize variation and run to optimum target is SPC. SQC is typically
the measuring and recording of data against specific requirements for a product ensuring they meet the
necessary requirements. Both play an integrated role in seeing operational success achievement. TQM
expresses about continuous improvement in the processes while TQC is about maintaining the quality
standards throughout the process. Armand Feigenbaum was the first to introduce the concept TQC what
eventually led to TQM. Dr. Kaoru Ishikawa`s definition of quality control, "Total Quality Control is a
thought revolution in management, to practice quality control is to develop, design, produce and service
a quality product which is most economical, most useful and always satisfactory to the consumer. To
meet this goal, everyone in the company must participate in and promote quality control, including top
executives, all divisions, within the company and all employees."
TQM is described as a collective, interlinked system of quality practices that is associated with
organizational performance and customer satisfaction [1-3].Total quality management (TQM) principles
and techniques are now a well-accepted part of almost every manager's “tool kit” [4]. According to Choi
and Eboch, TQM is a pathway to organizational performance and customer satisfaction. There are four
areas of management practices within the TQM system to assess: management of process quality,
human resources management, strategic quality planning, and information and analysis. An integrated
TQM can be viewed as a composite of the following seven constructs i.e. top management commitment;
quality measurement and benchmarking; process management; product design; employee training and
empowerment; supplier quality management and customer involvement and satisfaction. TQM is a
proven systematic approach to the improvements of the organization’s overall business process,
including quality of products and services [5]. The transformation to a TQM organization depends on the
extent to which firms successfully implement certain quality management practices. TQM practices
include top management support; customer relationship, supplier relationship, workforce management,
quality information, product/ service design, and process management
Evolution of quality in manufacturing
The following section briefly traces the Birth of Quality Management Principles in
manufacturing quality. This is illustrated in Fig-2
The roots of quality management go back to the guild system in medieval times, with master
craftsman status representing higher quality goods and services. Fast-forward to the industrial
revolution, where quality evolved to focus on factory inspections and removing defective
goods. During World War II Deming successfully applied Shewhart’s statistical quality control
methods to war manufacturing, where statistical process control helped the armed forces
speed up inspections without sacrificing safety. Post World War II Shewhart cycle of plan-do-
study-act was the basis for the modern plan-do-check-act cycle. In coming decades,
manufacturers continued to refine quality management methods, going beyond inspection to
focus on strategies that also incorporated processes and people. Throughout the 50s and 60s,
Japan’s quality focus allowed manufacturers to produce increasingly higher-quality goods at
lower prices. The Toyota Production System was developed during this period, focusing on
minimizing inventory and waste. This development represents one of the earliest modern forms
of a Quality Management System (QMS).
Over the time, post-war economic boom, companies actually had to shift the focus towards
customer satisfaction to make consumers happier and win their heart for business growth. By
the 1970s, Japan was outcompeting the U.S. in automobiles and electronics manufacturing. U.S.
Companies began losing market share, leading to cost-cutting and import restriction strategies.
Not surprisingly, these methods did nothing to improve the quality of goods. With the American
economy suffering from its inability to compete on quality, Total Quality Management was
born, setting the stage for a flourishing of quality and operational excellence strategies in the
U.S. In the 21st Century TQM was a major early force in quality management; it has largely
faded from view in recent decades in favor of newer approaches such as Six Sigma and lean
manufacturing. Where is quality headed from here? We’re seeing a few considerable shifts:
Integration: Technology now makes it possible for companies to break down barriers between
departments. As companies move in this direction, they’re also integrating the QMS with
processes like safety and sustainability, which are also tied to customer satisfaction.
Big Data: Today’s QMS captures more data than ever, allowing companies to leverage
sophisticated reporting and business intelligence tools to build a competitive advantage.
Risk Management: Companies are realizing that risk management and quality are inseparably
linked. Risk awareness is growing among quality managers, something reflected in the risk-
based approaches now being leveraged in recent iterations of ISO 9001.We’ve come a long way
in improving quality. Now the question is how to build on that success. No matter how a
company approaches it, it’s clear that data and statistical analysis will remain front and center.
Integrated
design and
manufact
Improvement in
uring
product quality
Improve Qu
Focus on profit Statist d Customer-
ality
and ical designs driven
production Statistic Process quality
Organizati thr
quotas al focus
Inspecti ou
on 1920 samplin Contro onal gh
g l quality 1980
1940 focus desi
1960 gn
2000
Figure-2
Top Quality Gurus Dr. Joseph M. Juran, Dr. W. Edwards Deming, Philip B. Crosby, Armand V.
Feigenbaum, Dr. Kaoru Ishikawa who have shaped quality as we know it today made significant
contributions on the management aspects of quality. Dr. Genichi Taguchi significantly
contributed on the engineering aspects of quality
Six Sigma is another effective tool of quality management. The methodologies and procedures
involved in both TQM and Six Sigma appear quite similar but a thin line of difference does exist
between them. Six-Sigma is a relatively newer concept than Total Quality Management but not
exactly its replacement. Six-Sigma focuses on improving quality by minimizing and eventually
eliminating defects from the system. Six Sigma, focuses on first identifying and eventually
removing various defects and obstacles which might come in the way of organization’s success.
Six-Sigma involves specially trained individuals whereas total quality management does not
require extensive training. The process of Six Sigma is based on customer feedbacks and is more
accurate and result oriented. Experts predict that six sigma will outshine total quality
management in due course of time. Understanding the process fluctuation, the elements
influencing it and reduction of process variation by using a set of statistical tools is the concept
of Six Sigma. Six Sigma includes five steps: Define Measure, Analyse, Improve, and Control.
Lean thinking is sometimes called lean manufacturing, the Toyota production system The Lean
concept originated from the Toyota production system to improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of process performance. Lean has been described variously as a philosophy, an
approach, a technique and a transformational management strategy to achieve improvement in
production processes. The Lean methodology aims to maximize value for customers while
minimizing waste. Waste, is defined as anything not necessary to produce the product or
service. Lean’s emphasis is on flow. The five essential steps in lean are a) Pinpoint value, b)
Pinpoint the value stream, c) Improve flow, d) Permit customer pull, e) Perfect the process.
The Quality Engineering and management are very important in the development and delivery
phases. Out of all the development and delivery phases Testing is one of the phases that are
often cut out focusing on testing phase is essential. Underestimating testing phase is dangerous
as it may lead to serious consequences in the future. We are building the product so well that
we can test it in a short period of time should never be the phrase mentioned.
Most companies today have an inherent understanding of how quality impacts different areas
of business. However, there seems to be difficulty in gauging how quality management plays a
role outside of traditional quality functions, such as audit management, inspections, and
compliance. Quality management issues facing the manufacturing industry are
How has your organization nurtured a culture of quality over the last year?
Have you made gains in assessing metrics and key performance indicators?
Do you still have disparate QMS solutions in place?
Is your technology architecture ready to handle exponential data growth?
Is your organization poised to close the loop on quality management?
How best to identify where quality is impacting the value chain
How to architect business processes that promote communication and collaboration
across these touch points
How to best deploy a technology strategy that supports these business processes.
HOW HAS YOUR ORGANIZATION NURTURED A CULTURE OF QUALITY OVER THE LAST YEAR?
Whether you call it top-level support or executive buy-in, leadership is absolutely critical to
nurturing a successful culture of quality. The LNS Research 2012-2013 Quality Management
Survey reiterates the familiar theme of a lack of employees taking ownership of quality issues.
Of all of the top five quality management issues facing the manufacturing industry, this issue
remains a primary concern. Over 50% of executives surveyed by LNS Research reported that
their organization views quality as a department, not a responsibility throughout the enterprise.
Personnel working outside of quality management depend upon executive leadership to foster
a complete, holistic culture of quality. Without such support, quality initiatives will likely
produce minimal gains.
Successful quality management does not occur in a vacuum; all departments have a stake in
continually improving quality management systems. Today’s global manufacturing industry
demands that companies redefine the role that quality departments take within the corporate
chain of command. Buy-in from employees on the shop floor is as critical as buy-in from senior
management. Quality management initiatives can influence internal business processes greatly,
so companies should foster a culture of quality awareness that extends to every quality-related
department.
Does compliance seem like a never-ending race through a rapidly changing maze? Does
successful risk mitigation seem like a pipe dream? To reduce the amount of effort and
resources needed to meet regulatory compliance Quality Management Software helps to win
the compliance race and realize lower risk. Enterprise’s business should be ready to be
transformed by a QMS software that provides best-in-class data visibility with open integration
capabilities? Quality team should have a deep knowledge of quality issues and QMS software
utilization, so that they can provide timely deployments and understanding, educate customer
support.
Are you ready to free yourself from the maze and enjoy the peace of mind that comes from
implementing an effective, time-tested quality risk mitigation solution?
Effectively managing quality and compliance in manufacturing means making it part of the
process toward operational excellence. Manufacturers often find this difficult, however,
because their quality management tools based on homegrown or legacy systems are not up to
the challenge and compel them to take a reactive approach – treating quality and compliance
like mere items on their list of priorities. Not only is this outdated approach a hindrance to long-
term growth goals, but it can also be costly and dangerous.
Software that provides solutions to quality management for manufacturing of all types
regardless of the complexities of manufacturing operations and unique compliance challenges
is essential. It should raise the bar for quality management systems. Quality management
software should optimize the connections between people, processes and technology, both
inside your own operation and in relation to your upstream and downstream partners whether
you are in general manufacturing or a specialized industry such as aerospace and defense,
automotive, medical devices or food and beverage. With one integrated software solution, it
should enhance quality management for manufacturing, including ISO 9001, ISO 14000,
AS9100, IATF 16949, ISO 13485, FDA GxP, FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and HACCP/ISO 22000.
By utilizing the best-in-class quality management software, businesses can enable an
environment of continuous improvement, moving from running around a maze of quality and
compliance issues to leading the way out. Quality management software’s ability should not
only streamline, harmonize and centralize quality and compliance data but also result in faster,
improved processes and workflows in the fast-paced global economy.
Transforming ISO 9001:2015 Compliance: ISO 9001 is the backbone of quality management for
manufacturing today, and meeting the ISO 9000 family of standards is considered a
fundamental requirement in most manufacturing settings.
RISK MITIGATION
Doing business is risky, but not using technology to help address risk throughout your business
and supply chain is riskier. Thomson-Reuters found that increasing numbers of companies are
capitalizing on technology to reduce risk. Software can provide a powerful framework for best
practices. QMS software drives compliance with regulatory requirements and conformance to
quality standards, significantly reducing risk and improving processes. QMS software provides
unique, real-time insights into the business, allowing pinpointing potential risk, analyze its
impact on the firm and then develop strategies to eliminate or mitigate the risk.
DATA VISIBILITY
Data visibility is the heart of solid decision-making across any organization, but
the generation of massive data sets is worthless without a way to aggregate and
analyze those data. Make no mistake: data is the key differentiator for business,
especially when it comes to quality management issues. In Harvard Business
Review, authors Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson showed that companies
that utilize their data to make decisions are 5 percent more productive and 6
percent more profitable than those that do not.
QMS software provides high visibility of every phase of the product lifecycle,
even providing insights into your supply chain.
The traditional methods for managing nonconformances have lost their place in
manufacturing. Organizations competing at a global scale or in industries with
complex products cannot continue to do so with disconnected, manual
spreadsheet-based methods. These organizations need to take an automated,
centralized, and standardized approach.
You may not be able to function without your supplier network, but that doesn’t
mean you should give suppliers free rein. The cost of poor quality is so closely
related to supplier quality and compliance that manufacturers must give the
proper attention and resources to the optimization of their upstream partnerships.
The scorecard feature within IQS Supplier Quality Software is vital for
manufacturers managing multiple suppliers simultaneously. Whether you’re
working with dozens or thousands of partner companies, having the ability to
quantify their performance based on real-time metrics and track their
improvements over time is crucial for any proactive quality management strategy.
SUPPLIER PORTAL
One of the greatest bottlenecks to quality and compliance performance
improvements is being able to effectively communicate across the enterprise. In
a true end-to-end quality management environment, “the enterprise” includes
your upstream partners. IQS Supplier Portal Software facilitates communication
via a web-based quality management interface.
The portal is used by customers and employees who need access to certain data
and EQMS functionalities. It can bi-directionally and automatically dispense
quality performance information. By creating customized notifications,
manufacturers can tailor alerts to be non-visible, read-only, or editable. This
fosters improved supplier and customer communication and relationships from
an enterprise-wide perspective.