Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
II. The Second Stage of Analytical Reading: Rules for Interpreting a Book’s Contents
(INTERPRETRATIVE)
Ill. The Third Stage of Analytical Reading: Rules for Criticizing a Book as a
Communication of Knowledge (CRITICAL)
9. Do not begin criticism until you have completed your out line and your
interpretation of the book. (Do not say you agree, disagree, or suspend
judgment, until you can say "I understand.")
10. Do not disagree disputatiously or contentiously.
11. Demonstrate that you recognize the difference between knowledge and mere
personal opinion by presenting good reasons for any critical judgment you
make.
Note: Of these last four, the first three are criteria for dis agreement. Failing in all of
these, you must agree, at least in part, although you may suspend judgment on the
whole, in the light of the last point.
How to Read A Book: The Classic Guide to Intelligent Reading Author Mortimer J. Adler and
Charles Van Doren
NOTES ON ANALYTICAL READING
Say do you like or dislike the book then say why. No one can disagree on what you like or
dislike, but whether a book is good or bad is arguable.
… Hence, to complete the task of criticism, you must objectify your reactions by
pointing to those things in the book that caused them. You must pass from saying what
you like or dislike and why, to saying what is good or bad about the book and why.
How to Read A Book: The Classic Guide to Intelligent Reading Author Mortimer J. Adler and
Charles Van Doren