Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Built on isrs7: a world leading system • Baker and CSB Reports into Texas City
isrs7 is a world leading system for measuring, improving • CPL 03-00-004 – Petroleum Refinery Process Safety
and demonstrating safety, environmental and business Management National Emphasis Program
performance. isrs7 helps you manage your risks. It assures • UK Offshore Safety Case Regulations
and improves the health of your business processes, • ISO 9001:2000 - Quality Management
provides management with advanced decision support • ISO 14001:2004 - Environmental Management
and builds reputation. It also drives business results and • OHSAS 18001:1999 - Health and Safety
helps you establish competitive advantage. Management
• PAS 55:2004 - Asset Management
isrs7 has been developed as a Joint Industry Project • Global Reporting Initiative 2002 - Corporate Social
between DNV and partners from the Nuclear, Chemical Responsibility
and Petrochemicals industries worldwide. It is based on
the long established International Safety Rating System Benefits
(ISRS), which over 30 years has been used by thousands DNV’s isrs7 PSM helps you achieve:
of sites across the world. • systematic and effective control of process risks
• advanced management decision support
isrs7 PSM: additional focus • improved process safety, environmental and
In developing the Process Safety Management (PSM) business performance
version of isrs7, DNV has refocused the tool to consider • the ability to meet and exceed regulatory
the specific controls needed for managing process requirements
related events. This was based upon the currently • optimised work processes using industry best
evolving best practice and incorporates learning’s from a practice
range of authoritative sources. • quantified goal setting
• internal and external benchmarking
isrs7 PSM includes the requirements and • evaluation of the condition of plant and equipment
• improved behaviour and commitment of
learnings from:
personnel
• OSHA 1910.119 – Process Safety Management
• continual improvement through a single integrated
• Seveso II Directive – 96/82/EC
management system.
• MES 2 – Metatechnical Evaluation System
Cover picture © OMV Aktiengesellschaft
3
Photo © GlaxoSmithKline
4
A structured approach
PSM Omega Processes It involves a thorough assessment of all 15 processes
isrs PSM adopts a structure based on 15 processes,
7 and typically takes one to two weeks depending on
embedded in a continual improvement loop which is the size of the site. The assessment includes
common to leading integrated management systems. interviews with management process owners where
The PSM Omega processes are designed to manage risk questions are answered and scored. Detailed
and drive continuous improvement. verification is conducted and organisations must be
prepared to offer evidence to support their answers.
Strategy 1. Leadership
The Physical Conditions Assessment
2. Planning and Administration A key feature of the PSM Omega Assessment is the
3. Risk Evaluation Physical Conditions Assessment which assesses the
Plan 4. Human Resources effectiveness of your PSM system in the workplace.
5. Compliance Assurance The Physical Conditions Assessment looks in detail at
6. Project Management the technical condition and operability of risk control
equipment on site. It assesses the awareness and
7. Training and Competence understanding of front line managers and workforce
8. Communication and Promotion with regard to risk control barriers and PSM.
9. Risk Control Regulatory compliance can also be reviewed through
Implement 10. Asset Management the Physical Conditions Assessment.
11. Contractor Management and
Purchasing Scoring and Results
12. Emergency Preparedness The results from interviews, document checks, and
the Physical Conditions Assessment are combined to
Monitor 13. Learning from Events determine an overall level of PSM Omega
14. Risk Monitoring performance between one and ten. The results
provide you with a detailed measure of performance
Review 15. Results and Review and a gap analysis against your desired level of
performance. This becomes the planning basis for
PSM Omega Assessment improvement during the next period.
The effective implementation of PSM depends on the
implementation of a robust management system .The The following section provides a brief overview of the
PSM Omega Assessment is a comprehensive evaluation isrs7 PSM Management processes.
of your management processes against best practice.
5
The Compliance Assurance process tests the The Training and Competency process reviews the
identification and use of regulations, external system used for training including identification of
authorisations to operate, codes and standards. It training needs, instructor management and training
reviews the reporting system to authorities as well as delivery. It reviews the orientation and induction
the system to ensure compliance with chosen process for leaders and general personnel as well as
requirements. It also reviews the robustness of the for specific jobs; and considers the evaluation of
product stewardship systems. training systems to foster continual improvement. The
PSM version specifically addresses Process Safety
6. Project Management Knowledge and Competence
Projects are unique activities with a beginning and an
end. Their unique character introduces risks into the 8. Communication and Promotion
workplace and requires careful planning to ensure Good communication is essential for effective
risks are controlled and that projects are completed management of change. In an ever changing
on time, on budget and to the desired quality. Formal workplace, effective communication is critical both to
accountabilities should be defined for each project. inform and motivate personnel. Good communication
Project plans define the goals, responsibilities, is more than telling – it should be an interactive
resources and risks throughout the project lifecycle. process of “giving and getting understanding”.
Effective execution and control ensures changes are Promotion campaigns and varied communication
managed, work is completed correctly and stakeholder channels should be used to promote performance
expectations are met. Post project review ensures improvement in a fresh and interesting way.
lessons are learned for future projects. Management and group meetings should be focused
on key risk issues and co-ordinated to ensure
The Project Management process reviews the project important information is filtered up and cascaded
co-ordination system to ensure projects are aligned to down effectively. Exceptional group and individual
business needs. It tests the robustness of project performance should be identified and widely
planning, project execution, project control and close communicated to reinforce correct behaviours.
out, and looks at how Process Safety is built into plant,
equipment and systems through the application of The Communication and Promotion process tests the
suitable studies and Process Safety Project Reviews. effectiveness of the communication system, the co-
ordination of management, operational and
7. Training and Competence maintenance meetings. It examines the quality of
Personnel must have the necessary competence to group meetings, the Joint Committee/Council and
execute their jobs effectively. An effective training Promotion Campaigns. The system of coaching is
system is important in order to identify and deliver the tested, as is the method of recognition for individuals
training necessary to ensure individual competence. and teams.
7
isrs7 has been developed as a Joint Industry Project between DNV and partners from the Nuclear,
Chemical and Petrochemicals industries worldwide. The PSM version builds on this to create a best
practice standard for the management of process safety.
8
13. Learning from Events The Risk Monitoring process reviews the performance
Learning from events is critical to drive continual and robustness of the hazard monitoring systems
improvement in process safety, environmental and including the control arrangements in place. It tests
business performance. An effective Learning from the effectiveness and the use of perception surveys.
Events system transforms undesired events into Also, it considers the use of behavioural observation
improvement opportunities. Managers should strive to and task observation and reviews the use of system
create a “no blame” culture in the organisation to audits to assure that the management system meets its
foster high levels of event reporting. Personnel should goals.
be particularly encouraged to report near misses,
which offer the greatest number of learning 15. Results and Review
opportunities. All events should be risk assessed and To survive and prosper, a business must achieve good
investigated appropriately involving both managers results. Business results are measured simply by
and front line personnel. Investigations must uncover comparing actual performance against the safety,
the basic causes of events before determining the environmental and business goals set by the leadership
necessary corrective and preventative actions. Actions team (Process 1). The challenge for business leaders is
must be tracked to completion and the results to direct business and work processes both to manage
communicated to all necessary stakeholders. exposures and achieve good business results. Leaders
should also understand the residual levels of risk that
The Learning from Events process reviews the remain. Sustained or continually improving
reporting of events, investigation, allocation of performance can be demonstrated by preparing
corrective actions and follow up. Reported events may trends of business results. Performance benchmarking
include safety events, environmental lapses through to may be undertaken by those organisations who wish to
breaches of security. It tests the system to learn from compare themselves with industry leaders or world
success and to ensure adequate participation in class performance. The management system is the
investigations. It establishes that there is a robust near leadership team’s primary tool to manage risks and
miss/substandard conditions system in place, that drive improvement. Formal management reviews are
complaints are managed adequately and that events necessary to evaluate the performance of the
are communicated effectively. It tests the robustness of management system, identify improvement actions
the action follow-up system and considers away from and feedback into the strategy and planning process.
work accidents. Furthermore, it tests the analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility demands that
accident data and the use of problem solving teams. businesses demonstrate good safety, environmental
and business performance to all relevant stakeholders
14. Risk Monitoring (identified in Process 1).
Risk monitoring is essential to provide assurance to
managers and other stakeholders that all risks are The Results and Review process considers the
effectively controlled. Risk Monitoring builds on Risk performance of the organisation versus its goals. It
Evaluation (Process 3) and Risk Control (Process 9) to establishes the robustness of the management review
complete the risk management continual system, the annual reporting process and the use of
improvement loop. Effective monitoring should economic and environmental indicators. It considers
identify where risk controls are inadequate, and the use of social performance indicators concerning
initiate the necessary improvement actions. Employee labour practices, human rights and societal and
perception surveys are often useful to monitor the product responsibility. It also tests the effectiveness of
perceptions of key stakeholders. Behavioural reporting to stakeholders.
observation is important to reinforce desired safety,
environmental and quality behaviours in the
workforce.
www.dnv.com