Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Steven Spielberg once said, “Every time I go to a movie, it’s magic, no matter what the
movie’s about”. The film industry has become one of the most creative, advanced, and magical
businesses in the world. With continuous development, and an endless amount of technological
improvements, the film industry has allowed creators to bring unforgettable stories to life. These
stories allow characters to give audiences a plethora of opportunities to learn valuable life
lessons. The major that I am currently declared to pursue is Digital Media Production, with a
dream of eventually becoming a movie producer or director for Walt Disney. The film industry
in general has long been known for its ability to allow creators to express a wide variety of
unique stories that are beloved by audiences worldwide. Although the film industry may seem
like a perfect world, every industry faces a wide variety of issues within their sector. One very
controversial topic that continues to surround the film industry is the gender pay gap. I have
decided to analyze two sources that go into depth about this issue, but in different manners. One
Before I dive deeper into analyzing and comparing my two sources, you may be
wondering, “What even is the gender pay gap?” The gender pay gap is referred to as the average
difference in salary between men and women. The discussion of this topic is one that takes place
in several industries, as women tend to get paid by a far smaller amount than men. Although this
issue has been debated in more general terms, it has picked up immensely in this specific
industry. According to Insider, which is an online media platform that reports financial news,
“The top 10 highest-paid actresses in 2018 earned less than 30 cents for every dollar earned by
their male counterparts. These actresses brought in a combined salary of $186 million, while the
Matthew Schwam
10 highest-paid men earned $748.5 million” (Insider, 1). Insider is essentially reporting that
males actors bring in an astonishing income of at least $562 million more than females. To even
further analyze this data, Sofia Vergara, 2020’s highest paid actress makes $44.5 million less
than the highest paid male actor of 2020, which is Dwayne Johnson. The wage gap doesn’t stop
there, as actresses in the film industry aren’t the only ones who are experiencing this inequality.
It has also been proven that positions on set that are performed by males, such as directors and
producers tend to bring in a much larger income than female employees, directors, and
producers.
The first source that I consulted when researching this topic is an online article, known as
Fast Company. Fast Company is an American business magazine that publishes their content
both online and print. The magazine reports information about technology, business, and design
in several different industries. The magazine is also a very reliable source for content, as they
publish at least eight print catalogs per year on top of their seasonal editions of online content. In
the article I analyzed, Fast Company’s winter edition in the year 2019 was about the issue of the
gender pay gap in the film industry. The reporting of this information made sense, since statistics
had just been released about Michelle Williams being paid eight times less than Mark Wahlberg
in the film, All the Money in the World. The gender pay gap has always been a looming issue that
sits on top of the film industry, but once the news broke out about this particular film, the issue
blew up and ran rampant throughout the industry. This appalling report caused several actresses
and other women employees in the industry to speak out against the pay gap.
After reading source number one, Fast Company, I decided to take my research a step
further and see what others had to say about this ongoing issue. After scrolling through hundreds
of videos discussing the immense gap between the two genders, I came across a video that
Matthew Schwam
contains famous actress, Priyanka Chopra, discussing her thoughts regarding this dilemma.
Chopra has been working in this industry for at least sixteen years now, and has been involved in
over fifty movies, including plenty of well-known movies such as Baywatch, The Sky Is Pink ,
and Isn’t It Romantic. Aside from acting, Chopra also produces some of her own films. Being so
involved in the industry has allowed Priyanka Chopra to see the astonishing pay gap between
men and women. She happens to be a very vital figure to this movement, and has been fighting
against it for years. In the video, she even states in her response to the interviewee’s question
that, “The conversations and the battles needs to continue, and we need men standing up for
feminism” (Chopra).
After a lot of research, I became far more knowledgeable on the subject that surrounds
the industry that I plan to work in as I get older. Another thing that I found extremely interesting
while researching is the way in which the two sources that I reviewed both discussed the same
general issue, but had very different ways of portraying the information to its viewers. The two
sources differed in quite a few rhetorical strategies to get the same point across. The most
noticeable strategies in which the sources differed was purpose, rhetorical appeals, medium, and
tone. Although there was a number of differences between the two, they were both similar in
To start, the sources tried to accomplish the same goal, but their purpose or intent of
addressing the situation was different. In source number one, Fast Company’s purpose is to
inform readers with a series of facts and logic. The magazine even conducted their own study to
persuade reader’s to think the same ideologies as them. On the other hand, in source number two,
the speech given by Priyanka Chopra in the video has a purpose of inspiring women to continue
Matthew Schwam
to fight against the inequality, and to ignore the media if they don’t see how far they have
already come.
To continue, the source’s had a very different approach to their rhetorical appeals. Fast
Company very clearly utilizes the rhetorical appeal of logos. Logos is an appeal that persuades its
audience with the use of logic and facts. Throughout the majority of the online article, viewers
can see several statistics such as, “ In 2017, a comparison of the highest-paid male and female
actors revealed an average salary of $57.4 million for men and $21.8 million for women. That
means that top female actors earn 38% as much as the top male actors” (Fast Company, 1).
This source even states that they conducted their own study, furthering the point of using
statistics in their persuasion, which makes their appeal a form of logos. Conversely, in source
number two, Priyanka Chopra’s speech can easily be identified as ethos and pathos. Ethos is
Chopra is a highly respected figure in the film industry, and many will be persuaded by her
simply because she is so respected. The use of pathos can also be seen because Chopra speaks
about the issue in such a serious and motivational manner, which invokes an emotion of
To further contrast the two, they are presented on different platforms, or mediums.
Fast Company can easily be identified as a text-based artifact because it is an online magazine
that is written or typed. The YouTube video that houses the video of Priyanka Chopra’s
format instead of written. As previously stated, the two artifacts differ in their purpose and
rhetorical appeals, calling for a difference in the manner in which they present their
information to the audience, known as the author’s tone. The tone seen in Fast Company’s
Matthew Schwam
magazine is more serious and argumentative, as they appear to shove a ton of statistics in the
audience’s face to prove and persuade the audience to see the inequality in the industry.
However, although Chopra is serious when speaking in the video provided by source two, she
speaks in a more motivational and inspirational tone about the subject. She even deflects the
pay gap for a small portion of the video to explain that women should already be proud of
what they've accomplished so far. Chopra finishes off her tangent with hope that this fight
There are a couple of similarities that can be seen when comparing the two artifacts,
such as content and audience. The content in both sources share the same opinion about the
gender pay gap in the film industry in their own unique way. Lastly, both research materials
are targeting the same audience. The audience is clearly the women working in this industry,
as well as all women around the globe. The gender pay gap is an issue faced all around the
world, and these two sources are trying to motivate women to continue to take a stand for
equality.
In conclusion, the film industry is a magical industry, but certainly has its fair share of
issues revolving around it, as most industries do. The gender pay gap has been the major
conflict seen in this business, and has long been debated. I was able to learn a ton of new
information about this business that I didn't know prior to my research. I will definitely
continue to research this dilemma in the future with even more sources to learn more about
the field that I am dreaming of pursuing. This industry peaked my interest ever since I was a
child in love with Disney, and all of the character’s stories that came along with it. My love for
Disney movies, and passion for filmmaking has influenced my desire to become a producer for
Matthew Schwam
Disney. In fact, I am sure that I owe quite a few life revelations to Walt and his teams. I want to
create powerful films that will impact people’s lives, just as Walt did for me.
Matthew Schwam
Works Cited
Ahlgrim, Callie. “11 Of the Most Alarming Examples of Hollywood's Gender Pay Gap.” Insider,
paid-less-than-actors-2019-4.
Dishman, Lydia. “Discrimination Plays a Role in Hollywood Salaries, and Women Lose.” Fast
www.fastcompany.com/90446804/discrimination-plays-a-role-in-hollywood-salaries-and-
women-lose.
2020.