moorish americans

aboriginal and indigenous natural peoples of the land of the america’s

______________________________________________________________________________

November 26th, 2020

affidavit of truth
investigation
Chief Justice Richard Wagner
Supreme Court of Canada
301 Wellington St,
Ottawa, ON K1A 0J1
Phone: 1 613)-995-4330
Fax: 416-327-2339
Law Society of Ontario
Osgoode Hall, 130 Queen Street West
Toronto, ON M5H 2N6
The Ontario Judicial Council
P.O Box 914
31 Adelaide St. E.
Adelaide Street Postal Station
Toronto, Ontario M5C 2K3
Phone: 416-327-5672
Fax: 416-327-2339
Ontario Bar Association
20 Toronto St, Suite 300
Toronto, ON M5C 2B8
Phone: (416) 869-1047
Fax: (647) 495-8913
Email: info@oba.org
David Lametti
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of CANADA
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0A6
Phone: 905-830-0303
CC. CANADA Provost Marshal, and The American Provost Marshal
1. What is DOCUMENT?
An instrument on which is recorded, by means of letters, figures, or marks, matter which may be
evidentially used. In this sense, the term “document” applies to writings; to words printed,
lithographed, or photographed; to seals, plates, or stones on which inscriptions are cut or engraved; to
photographs and pictures; to maps and plans. The inscription may be on stone or gems, or on wood, as
well as on paper or parchment.1 Whart Ev. Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed.

Page 1 of 13
 OUR MISSION STATEMENT

To enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States according to the law;
to ensure public safety against threats foreign and domestic; to provide
federal leadership in preventing and controlling crime; to seek just
punishment for those guilty of unlawful behavior; and to ensure fair and
impartial administration of justice for all Americans.
The United States Department of Justice

3. to whom it may concern, i am writing to you with great troubling and disturbing facts. i receive
documentS from Joseph Agueci, AGUECI & CALABRETTA Barristers & Solicitors located at
5700 Yonge street, STE,1110. Toronto Ontario, M2M 4K2, DATED November 17th, 2020. i will
attached copies for your investigation. these document also claim to be from Ontario Superior Court of
Justice. Court File No: CV-20-00001102-0000.

b. first; let me say that no documentation was sent to me to appear. second; there is no name nor wet ink
signature on the document. third; under what jurisdiction is he addressing me ? fourth; is Joseph Agueci
a debt collector with a designative mark? which supreme court rule that lawyers are not debt
collector. which he is claiming to be. he also claim i owe his client. Graham Linton and Greg
Manbeck money. which neither of them as verified. Both Parties were serve with an affidavit of
fact-wirt in nature of discovery dated March 31, 2020
to prove their claim. not disclosure or documentation was received.

c. Denial of Discovery is a direct violation of Contract Law, the Supreme Law of my

Constitutionally Secured Rights to “Due Process of Law” which is a direct violation of oath of
office.

d. 12 U.S. Code § 2605, Law: (a) DISCLOSURE TO APPLICANT RELATING TO ASSIGNMENT, SALE,

OR TRANSFER OF LOAN SERVICING
Each person who makes a federally related mortgage loan shall disclose to each person who
applies for the loan, at the time of application for the loan, whether the servicing of the loan may
be assigned, sold, or transferred to any other person at any time while the loan is outstanding.

e. The 5th Amendments require that all persons within the United States must be given due
process of the law and equal protection of the law.
“Due process of law implies the right of the person affected thereby to be present before the
tribunal which pronounces judgment upon the question of life liberty, or property, in its most
comprehensive sense; to be heard, by testimony or otherwise, and to have the right of
controverting, by proof, every material fact which bears on the question of right in the matter
involved.”
f. an affidavit of fact – Notice of Default Judgment dated July, 2020 was issued.
4 over turn and removal notice
i am asking for the overturn and removal of any judgment against my property for the following
reasons, if there is any.

a. the document have the name GARRY BROWNE. which is not me. i am a living breathing soul
and not a Corporation. party must prove that i am a corporate entity.
b. Lack of jurisdiction. Jurisdiction when challenge must prove to exist, and can be challenge at
anytime.

c. Title 28 USC 1330 states that the United States District Court has to grant permission for the
suit to be pursued once the court has been supplied sufficient proof that the United States
citizen is actually a corporate entity.

d. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12b 6 the prosecution has failed to provide
adequate proof that the parties involved in this situation are actually corporate entities. I have
provided ample proof that the prosecution and other agents are actually corporations.

d · Title 28 USC 1602-1611 (Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act) allows the jurisdiction of a
court to be challenged, and a demand of proper jurisdiction to be stated.

Page 2 of 13
e. Supreme Court Case Study: “Once Challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be
proved to exist.”Stcuk v Medical Examiners 94 Ca 2d 751.211,P2d 389.

f. Supreme Court Case Study: “Lack of Federal Jurisdiction cannot be waived or overcome by
agreement of parties”. Griffin v. Matthews, 310 F supra 341, 342 (1969): and “Want of
Jurisdiction may not be cured by consent of parties”.

g. Supreme Court Case Study: Hagans v Lavine 415 U.S. 533, There is no discretion to ignore
lack of jurisdiction. Joyce v U.S. 474 2d 215; The law provides that once State and Federal
jurisdiction have been challenged, it must be proven. Main v Thiboutot 100. S. Ct 2501 (1980);
"Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time " and "jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be
assumed and must be decided". Basso v Utah Power and Light Co. 495 F.2d 906,910.

h. isn’t the Ontario Superior Court Of Justice a FOREIGN COURT?

i. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 4j states that the Court jurisdiction and immunity fall
under a foreign State.

j· July 27th 1868 15 Statutes at Large Chapter 249 Section 1 “Acts Concerning American Citizens
in a Foreign State”, expatriation, is what is broken when jurisdiction is demanded, and it is not met
with an answer.
5. case in court
a. Title 22 CFR 93.1-93.2 states that the Department of State has to be notified of any suit, and in
turn has to notify the United States citizen of said suit.

b. The 11th Amendment states ”The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed
to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States
by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of an Foreign State.” (A foreign entity,
agency, or state cannot bring any suit against a United States citizen without abiding the
following procedure.)

c. Amendment 7: Rights in Civil Cases; In Suits at common law, where the value in
controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact
tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according
to the rules of the common law.

d.AmendmentV No
person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment
or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia,
when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same
offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be
a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

6. moorish american national.

a. we are the aboriginal indigenous moorish american nationals, the true and de jure natural
americans / al-moroccans and the divine heirs to the land. we are the descendants of the great pharaohs of
kemet and the ancient moabites, canaanites and hamitites. we are in propria persona sui juris, in proprio
solo and in proprio. heredes and we are exercising all of our rights at this time and at all points on time. the
moors at north america are a free national government as an ecclesiastical body politic. all lands of the
americas is our ancestral estate.

b. affidavit of organization, document #10105905, form 1099 recorded in the recorder of

deeds. office in the County of Cook, State of Illinois on August 1st, 1928 A.D at 2:52pm.
declaration of trust.
c. i jakim bey, the ancient dejure aboriginal indigenous divine
living natural moors of the land at north america, northwest amexem, north africa, the

Page 3 of 13
northgate are the trust corpus of this de jure ecclesiastically commissioned express trust. jakim
bey is the executor, settlor, claimant, and beneficiary of all said trust property.
whereas, i jakim bey a self-designated moors of my choosing, in propria
persona sui juris and in solo proprio are the trustees for the affairs of this de jure ecclesiastically
commissioned trust upon the land at north america, northwest amexem, north africa, the
northgate. while the moorish american people are the beneficiariy.
any and all benefits or privileges from any government that is not moorish nationals are not part
of this trust.

7. In the Library of Congress; Copyright Office.

- Copy of the Application AA 222141, AA 209316.
- Clock of Destiny; moorish american nationality card
- moorish-american zodiac constitution
- Citizenship; moorish american AA 222141
- Clock of Destiny; Masonry, Astrology, History, Geography -

a FREE MOORISH-AMERICAN ZODIAC CONSTITUTION:

(Zodiac Constitution and Birthrights of the Moorish Americans) being Ali, Bey, El, Dey and
Al), Article two (2), Paragraph two (2).

b. UNITED STATES REPUBLIC: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE:

Moorish American Credentials: AA 222141- TRUTH A-1
cUNITED STATES SUPREME COURT: SUPREME LAW - Acts of State
d. UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION: Article III (3), Section two (2), Amendment V (5)
(Liberty clause) and Amendment IX (9) (Reservation of the Rights of the People).

e. RESOLUTION NUMBER SEVENTY-FIVE (75): Dated April 17, 1933 A.D.

(MOORISH-AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANI, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
THE USE OF THEIR NAMES),

f. RESOLUTION NUMBER (1203) LC 1040002 Dated January 8-15, 2014 as Moorish

Holily Week. (MOORISH-AMERICAN SOCIETY OF GEORGIA as Moorish Holy Week.

g. PROCLAMATION MOORISH-AMERICAN Dated 22 nd, day of December 2011,

MOORISH-AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ILLINOIS, CITY OF CHICAGO January 8-
15, 2012 AS MOORISH-AMERICAN WEEK.

h. Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and
judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe
the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect
thereof. The Constitution for the United States of America Article IV Section 1

8 . Delaware is the first state of the United States. They

are Many “Moorish Native Tribes” on the American
Continent. These names were Change from
‘Moors to Indians’.
a. Delaware Code: Title 29, CHAPTER 1. Jurisdiction and Sovereignty.
§ 106 Lenape Indian Tribe of Delaware; recognition.
(a) Legislative findings. — The General Assembly finds all of the following:

(4) The Tribe was formerly known as “the Moors” and, for many decades of the twentieth
century, state documents such as driver’s licenses designated the Tribe’s race with an “M”.

b. attached in exhibit (A) (3) three states resolutions, proclamations.

1. a certify copy of the treaty of peace and friendship.
2. a copy of, the public statutes at large of the united states of america, volume 8 pages 2.
3. a copy of our vast estate express trust, and a copy of my identification card.
Page 4 of 13
9. Sovereignty and allodial Title.
a. we moors have allodial title to all lands on the american continent, north, south, central
and the adjoining islands. my property and allodial titles trust. has been place on public
record google and scribd.com jakim bey allodial title-yahwah establish trust.

b. we are the aboriginal indigenous moorish american nationals, the true and de jure
natural
americans / al-moroccans and the divine heirs to the land. we are the descendants of the great
pharaohs of kemet and the ancient moabites, canaanites and hamitites. we are in propria persona sui
juris, in proprio solo and in proprio heredes. we are exercising all of our rights at this time and at all
points in time. the moors at north america are a free national government as an ecclesiastical body
politic. all lands of the americas is our ancestral estate.

c. many moors refer to noble drew ali as our “holy prophet” he journeyed to Havana,
Cuba in 1928 where he received a grant from the Pan-American Conference for all of the
lands of the Americas – north, central and south America along with the adjoining islands
of the pacific and Atlantic oceans when he returned to Chicago he established trusts for
this land grant we, moors, are the beneficiaries of these trusts as heirs to the land, water,
minerals, air and commercial contracts everything that is attached to the land.

d. all lands are held in trust. affidavit of organization, document #10105905, form 1099
recorded in the recorder of deeds. office in the County of Cook, State of Illinois on August
1st, 1928 A.D at 2:52pm declaration of trust. i will attach a sample copy for your perusal.

e. i jakim bey, the ancient dejure aboriginal indigenous divine living natural moors of the
land at north america, northwest amexem, north africa, the northgate are the trust corpus
of this de jure ecclesiastically commissioned express trust. i jakim bey is the executor,
settlor, claimant, and beneficiary of all said trust property. whereas, i jakim bey a self-
designated moors of his choosing, in propria persona sui juris and in solo proprio are the
trustees for the affairs of this de jure ecclesiastically commissioned trust upon the land at
north america, northwest amexem, north africa, the northgate. while the moorish american
people are the beneficiary. any and all benefits or privileges from any government that is
not moorish nationals are not part of this trust.

f. the land of the Americas, are the land of the moors. the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between
Morocco and the United States of North America give credence to the fact. copy of the treaty will be
attach.

10. THE TREATY OF PEACE AND FRIENDSHIP OF 1787 A.D.

Between Morocco and the United States
The Treaty of Peace and Friendship was established under the authority of Mohammed lbn
Abdullah, the Sultan of Morocco, and seal by his ‘Royal Seal’ in the court of Morocco in the year
1199 – corresponding to 1786 A.D. The Treaty was ratified by President Author St Clair of the
United States Republic in the year 1787 A.D., which corresponds to 1200. The Treaty is one of
Amity and Commerce between Morocco and the United States of North America, and is
referred to as, “The Treaty of Peace and Friendship”. the world longest running treaty by
the Moors.

Article 20 “If any of the Citizens of the United States, or any Persons under their Protection,
shall have any disputes with each other, the Consul shall decide between the Parties, and
whenever the Consul shall require any Aid or Assistance from our Government, to enforce
his decisions, it shall be immediately granted to him.”
Article 21 “If any Citizen of the United States should kill or wound a Moor, or, on the contrary,
if a Moor shall kill or wound a Citizen of the United States, the Law of the Country shall take
place, and equal Justice shall be rendered, the Consul assisting at the Trial; and if any Delinquent
shall make his escape, the Consul shall not be answerable for him in any manner whatever.
11. title 50 section 7, c and e, 2012 edition,
TITLE 50 - APPENDIX-WAR AND NATIONAL DEFENSE
TRADING WITH THE ENEMY ACT OF 1917. Title 50 protects all American Nationals.

Page 5 of 13
 12. Treaties are the Surpreme law of the land.
Trieaties.
The obligation of a treaty, the supreme law of the land, must be admitted. The execution of
the contract between the two nations is to be demanded from the executive of each nation; but
where a treaty affects the rights of the parties litigating in court, the treaty as much binds those
rights, and is as much regarded by the Supreme Court as an act of Congress.
United States v. The Sehooner Peggy, 1 Cranch, 103;1 Cond. Rep. 256.
the public statutes at large of the united states of america, volume 8 pages 2.

13. all treaties and the constitution are the supreme law of
the land.
“The Constitution for the United States of America binds all judicial officers at Article 6, wherein
it does say, “This Constitution and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance
thereof, and all Treaties made, or which shall be made under the authority of the United States, shall
be the Supreme Law of the Land, and the Judges of every State shall be bound thereby, anything in
the Constitution or laws of any state to the Contrary, not withstanding,” see Clause 2.”

The “The Constitution for the United States of America, Article III, Section II - The judicial power
shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United
States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;--to all cases affecting
ambassadors, other public ministers and con-suls;--to all cases of admiralty and maritime
jurisdiction;--to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;--to controversies between
two or more states;--between a state and citizens of another state;--between citizens of different
states;--between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and
between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects. In all cases affecting
ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme
Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall
have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as
the Congress shall make. The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury; and
such trial shall be held in the state where the said crimes shall have been committed; but when not
committed within any state, the trial shall be at such place or places as the Congress may by law have
directed.

14.all supreme court rulings, are applicable in all

states.
The Constitution for the United States, via Art III, Section 2, is the granting authority to
and for ALL States, several States, and all Courts, including Inferior Courts. Any and All
Courts, Municipalities, States, States’ Constitutions, etc. cannot devise any instruments,
pass any Ordinances, Statutes, Policies, Acts etc., that abrogate the rules established in the
United States Constitution. This is clearly defined in Article VI, of the United States
Constitution, of which, Judge / Magistrate, has taken an Oath to uphold as well, and such
Oath finds itself Superior to any other allegiances or Oaths he may have taken.

15. after many years of the depriving indigenous people of their land. the United Nations General
Assembly adopted The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples (UNDRIP) on Thursday, 13 September 2007. more than one hundred and forty (140)
United Nations State members found it necessary for them to adopted the Declaration on the
Rights of Indigenous Peoples as to pave a way for healing and reconciling of past hurt and pain
of issues that was done to indigenous peoples.

16. Truth and Reconciliation Commission calls for UN Declaration to be the framework for
reconciliation. United Nations Declaration affirms right of Indigenous peoples to self-
determination. Self-determining peoples have a right to choose and to determine their own
future. Supreme Court of Canada ruled that international declarations are “relevant and
persuasive sources” for interpretation of domestic human rights. Prime Minister Trudeau
indicated his government is “absolutely committed” to implementation of UN Declaration and
TRC Calls to Action. Declaration is also a “top priority”.

Page 6 of 13
 Truth and Reconciliation The United Nations
17.
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples:
the United Nation ‘rule’ in article 26. that indigenous peoples have the right to the lands,
territories and resources which they traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or
acquired. this is part of truth and reconciliation.
Article 26 1. indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources which
they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired.
2. Indigenous peoples have the right to own, use, develop and control the lands, territories
and resources that they possess by reason of traditional ownership or other traditional
occupation or use, as well as those which they have otherwise acquired.
3. States shall give legal recognition and protection to these lands, territories and resources.
Such recognition shall be conducted with due respect to the customs, traditions and land
tenure systems of the indigenous peoples concerned.

18. Article 37 1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the recognition, observance and
enforcement of treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements concluded with
States or their successors and to have States honour and respect such treaties , agreements
and other constructive arrangements.
2. Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as diminishing or eliminating the rights
of indigenous peoples contained in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements.

19. Article 38 States, in consultation and cooperation with indigenous peoples, shall take
the appropriate measures, including legislative measures, to achieve the ends of this
Declaration.

20. Article 39 Indigenous peoples have the right to have access to financial and technical
assistance from States and through international cooperation, for the enjoyment of the
rights contained in this Declaration.

21. United States Supreme Court; SCHRIMPSCHER v. STOCKTON(1902) No. 19

Argued: November 22, 1901, Decided: January 6, 1902.

22. if you study the above Supreme Court Cases. which are now law on the books. you will
see clearly that the heirs have all rights to the land title by descent, or treaty. Color of Title
had no rights to any land.

23. AMERICAN DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS

AND DUTIES OF MAN:
WHEREAS: The American peoples have acknowledged the dignity of the individual, and their
national constitutions recognize that juridical and political institutions, which regulate life
in human society, have as their principal aim the protection of the essential rights of man
and the creation of circumstances that will permit him to achieve spiritual and material
progress and attain happiness;

The American States have on repeated occasions recognized that the essential rights of
man are not derived from the fact that he is a national of a certain state, but are based
upon attributes of his human personality;

The international protection of the rights of man should be the principal guide of an
evolving American law;

The affirmation of essential human rights by the American States together with the
guarantees given by the internal regimes of the states establish the initial system of
protection considered by the American States as being suited to the present social and
juridical conditions, not without a recognition on their part that they should increasingly
strengthen that system in the international field as conditions become more favorable,
The Ninth International Conference of American States.

Page 7 of 13
 Article XIX.
Every Person has the right to the nationality to which he is entitled by law and to change it,
if he so wishes,
for the nationality of any other country that is willing to grant it to him.

24. The American declaration on the rights of

indigenous people (ADRIP)
Article XXIV. Treaties, agreements, and other constructive arrangements

1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the recognition, observance, and enforcement of
treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements concluded with States or their
successors, in accordance with their true spirit and intent in good faith and to have States
honor and respect same. States shall give due consideration to the understanding of the
indigenous peoples as regards to treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements.

SECTION FIVE Social, economic, and property rights▼

Article XXV. Traditional forms of property and cultural survival. Right to land, territory, and
resources.

1. Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their distinctive spiritual,
cultural, and material relationship with their lands, territories, and resources and to uphold
their responsibilities to pre-serve them for themselves and for future generations.

2. Indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources which they have
traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired.

3. Indigenous peoples have the right to own, use, develop and control the lands, territories and
resources that they possess by reason of traditional ownership or other traditional occupation
or use, as well as those which they have otherwise acquired.

4. States shall give legal recognition and protection to these lands, territories and resources.
Such recognition shall be conducted with due respect to the customs, traditions and land
tenure systems of the indigenous peoples concerned.

5. Indigenous peoples have the right to legal recognition of the various and particular
modalities and forms of property, possession and ownership of their lands, territories, and
resources, in accordance with the legal system of each State and the relevant international
instruments. States shall establish special regimes appropriate for such recognition and for
their effective demarcation or titling.

25. publice notice warning and lien.

this is my public notice that i jakim bey or any declare moor be not stop, detain, or
harassed.
the AA222141 represent our nationality (moorish american). any conveyance with
moorish tags or with AA222141 should not be stop, detain or harresses. please enter into
your records. anyone caught violating. sovereign Universal Commercial Code 1 Lien will
be file, and court action in our sovereign court will be brought. our court has sovereign
jurisdiction in all matters on our land. both CANADA and The American Provost Marshal
will have a copy of this affidavit. Jakim bey affidavit of truth will be place public Record google
& scribed.com as jakim bey affidavit of truth and investigation.

if a crime is committed by a moor. the treaty should bind both parties, and the moor
should have right to consel. the treaty should bind both nation. i am a judge/vizir/minister.

the law. court: The person and suite of the sovereign; the place where the sovereign
sojourns with his regal retinue, wherever that may be. Black’s law Dictionary, 5ed, pg 425

Page 8 of 13
26. the right to travel

a. The rights of life and personal liberty are natural rights of man. 'To secure these rights,'
says the Declaration of Independence, 'governments are instituted among men, deriving their
just powers from the consent of the governed.' The very highest duty of the States, when they
entered into the Union under the Constitution, was to protect all persons within their
boundaries in the enjoyment of these 'unalienable rights’ with which they were endowed by
their Creator.' Sovereignty, for this purpose, rests alone with the States.

b. Supreme Court Case Study: “The Due Process Clause protects [the unalienable liberty
recognized in the Declaration of Independence] rather than the particular rights or privileges
conferred by specific laws or regulations." SANDIN v. CONNER, ___ U.S. ___ (1995)

c. Supreme Court Case Study: The Right of a citizen to Travel upon the public highways and
to transport one’s property thereon, either be carriage or automobile, is not a mere privilege,
which a City may prohibit or permit at will, but a common right, which he / she has under the
right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Thompson v. Smith 154 SE 579:

d. Supreme Court Case Study: The State is prohibited from violating substantive

rights. Owens v. City, 445 US 662 (1980); and it cannot do by one power (eg. Police power)
that which is, for example, prohibited expressly to any other such power (eg. Taxation / Eminent
Domain) as a matter of law. US and UT v. Daniels, 22 p 159, nor indirectly that which is
prohibited to it directly. Fairbanks v. US 181, US 283, 294, 300:

e. Supreme Court Case Study: The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and
transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental right of which the
public and Natural Beings cannot be rightfully deprived. Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago
337 Illinois 200, 169 NE 22, ALR, Ligare v. Chicago 139 ILL. 46, 28 HE 934, Boone v. Clark
214 SW 607, 25 AM jur (1st), Highways, sec. 163:

f. Supreme Court Case Study: The right to Park or Travel is part of the Liberty of which the
Natural Person, citizen cannot be deprived without “due process of law” under the Fifth
Amendment of the United States Constitution. Kent v. Dulles 357 US 116, 125:

g. Supreme Court Case Study: State Police Power extends only to immediate threats to public
safety, health, welfare, etc., Michigan v. Duke 266 US, 476 Led. At 449: which driving and
speeding are not. California v. Farley Ced. Rpt. 89, 20 CA3d 1032 (1971):

h. Supreme Court Case Study: Traveling in an automobile on the public roads was not a threat to
the public safety or health and constituted no hazard to the public, and such a traveler owed nothing
more than “due care” (as regards to tort for negligence) to the public and the owner owed no other
duty to the public (eg. State), he / she and his / her auto, having equal rights to and on the
roadways / highways as horses and wagons, etc.; this same right is still substantive rule, in
that speeding, running stop signs, traveling without license plates, or registration are not
threats to the public safety, and thus, are not arrestable offenses. Christy v. Elliot, 216 I 131,
74 HE 1035, LRA NS 1905 – 1910: California v. Farley 98 CED Rpt. 89, 20 CA 3d 1032
(1971).

i. Things which are not in commerce, as public roads, are in their nature unalienable. Some
things are unalienable, in consequence of particular provisions in the law forbidding their
sale or transfer, as pensions granted by the government. The natural rights of life and liberty
are UNALIENABLE.  Bouviers Law Dictionary 1856 Edition

j. Supreme Court Case Study: “No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and
attach a fee to it.” Murdock v. Penn., 319 US 105 . “A writing is ‘void ab initio’ in the case of
fraud in the inception, and it need not be formally rescinded as a prerequisite to right of
avoidance”. Bonacci v. Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co., (1943) 58 CA 2d 657,664

k. Supreme Court Case Study: “A state cannot impose restrictions on the acceptance of a
license that will deprive the licensee of his constitutional rights”.
Ruckenbrod v. Mullins, 102 Utah 548, 133 P.2d. 325, 144 ALR 839
Page 9 of 13
 27. Lawful, Legal Definitions and Land Ownership
Rights in Case-law
What is LAND?
in the most general sense, comprehends any ground, soil, or earth whatsoever; as meadows,
pastures, woods, moors, waters, marshes, furzes, and heath. Co. Litt 4a. The word “land”
includes not only the soil, but everything attached to it, whether attached by the course of
nature, as trees, herbage, and water, or by the hand of man, as buildings and fences. Mott v.
Palmer, 1 N. Y. 572; Nessler v. Neher, 18 Neb. 649, 26 N. W. 471; Higgins Fuel Co. v. Snow,
113 Fed. 433, 51 C. C. A. 267; Lightfoot v. Grove, 5 Heisk. (Tenn.) 477; Johnson v.
Richardson, 33 Miss. 464; Mitchell v. Warner, 5 Conn. 517; Myers v. League, 62 Fed. 659,
10 C. C. A. 571. 2 Bl. Comm. 16, 17. Land is the solid material of the earth, whatever may
be the ingredients of which it is composed, whether soil, rock, or other substance. Civ. Code
Cal. The Law DictionaryFeaturing Black's Law Dictionary Legal Dictionary 2nd Ed.

What is FEUDAL?
Pertaining to feuds or fees; relating to or growing out of the feudal systemor feudal law; having
the quality of a feud, as distinguished from “allodial.”
The Law DictionaryFeaturing Black's Law Dictionary Legal Dictionary 2nd Ed.

What is ESCHEAT?
In feudal law. Escheat Is an obstruction of the course of descent, and consequent
determination of the tenure, by some unforeseen contingency, in which case the land
naturally results back, by a kind of reversion, to the original grantor, or lord of the fee.
2 Bl. Comm. 15; Wallace v. Ilarrn- stad. 44 Pa. 501; Marshall v.Lovclass, 1 N. C. 445.
The Law Dictionary Featuring Black's Law Dictionary Legal Dictionary 2nd Ed.

What is INCORPOREAL HEREDITAMENTS?

These are the privileges and rights that are inherited.
The Law DictionaryFeaturing Black's Law Dictionary Legal Dictionary 2nd Ed.

What is HEREDITAMENTS?
Tilings capable of being inherited, be it corporeal or incorporeal, real, personal, or mixed,
and including not only lands and everything thereon, but alsolieir-looms, and certain
furniture which, by custom, may descend to the heir together with (he land. Co. Litt. 5b; 2
Bl. Comm. 17; Nell is v. Munson, 108 N. Y. 453, 15 N. E.730; Owens v. Lewis, 40 Ind. 508,
15 Am. Rep. 205; Whitlock v. Greacen. 4S N. J. Eq.350. 21 Atl. 944; Mitchell v. Warner, 5
Conn. 407; New York v. Mabie, 13 N. Y. 150, 04Am. Dec. 53S. Black's Law 2nd Ed.

What is ANCESTRAL?
Relating to ancestors, or to what has been done by them; as homage anccstrcl. Derived
from ancestors. Ancestral estates are such as are transmitted by descent,
and not by purchase.
4 Kent, Comm. 404. Brown v. Whaley, 58 Ohio St 054, 49 N. E. 479, 05 Am. St. Rep. 793.
The Law DictionaryFeaturing Black's Law Dictionary Legal Dictionary 2nd Ed.

What is ALLODIAL?

Page 10 of 13
Free; not holden of any lord or superior; owned without obligation of vassalage or fealty;
the opposite of feudal. Barker v. Dayton, 28 Wis. 3S4; Wallace v. Ilarmstad, 44 Pa. 499.
The Law DictionaryFeaturing Black's Law Dictionary Legal Dictionary 2nd Ed.

What is VASSAL?
In feudal law. A feudal tenant or grantee; a feudatory; the holder of a fief on a feudal
tenure, and by the obligation of performing feudal services. The correlative term was
“lord.” The Law DictionaryFeaturing Black's Law Dictionary Legal Dictionary 2nd Ed.

What is VASSALAGE?
The state or condition of a vassal.
The Law DictionaryFeaturing Black's Law Dictionary Legal Dictionary 2nd Ed.

What is FEALTY?
In feudal law. Fidelity; allegiance to the feudal lord of the manor; thefeudal obligation
resting upon the tenant or vassal by which he was bound to he faithfuland true to bis lord,
and render him obedience and service. See I)e I’oyster v. Michael,0 N. Y. 497. 57 Am. Dec.
470. The Law DictionaryFeaturing Black's Law Dictionary Legal Dictionary 2nd Ed.

28. 18 U.S. Code § 241.Conspiracy against rights

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in
any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or
enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the
United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with
intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so
secured—
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and
if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include
kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit
aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

29. 18 U.S. Code § 242.Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully
subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the
deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the
Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties,
on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are
prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in
violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a
dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of
this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual
abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be
fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be
sentenced to death.

30. i have not, or do not waive any of my rights. none of unalienable rights, United Nations
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, United Nations Universal Declaration on Rights of
Indigenous People, and all of my Rights granted me in the United States Constitutional. i
have not consented to any secret treaty, contracts, or colorable contracts or titles. all of my
rights are reserved at all points in time.
U.C.C. 1-207/ 1-308; U.C.C. 1-103

Page 11 of 13
31. Mailing Threatening Communications:
(a) Whoever knowingly deposits in any post office or authorized depository for
mail matter, to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service or knowingly causes to
be delivered by the Postal Service according to the direction thereon, any
communication, with or without a name or designating mark subscribed thereto,
addressed to any other person, and containing any demand or request for
ransom or reward for the release of any kidnapped person, shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

(b) Whoever, with intent to extort from any person any money or other thing of
value, so deposits, or causes to be delivered, as aforesaid, any communication
containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of
the addressee or of another, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than twenty years, or both.

32. United States Code: Title 18 > PART 1 > Chapter 41 § 872.
Extortion by Officers or Employees of the United States
Whoever, being an officer, or employee of the United States or any department
or agency thereof, or representing himself to be or assuming to act as such,
under color or pretense of office or employment, commits or attempts an act of
extortion, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three
years, or both; but if the amount so extorted or demanded does not exceed
$1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year,
or both.

33.. 18 U.S. Code § 201. Bribery of public officials and witnesses.

(3) directly or indirectly, demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept
anything of value personally for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to
be given by such person as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or for or
because of such person’s absence therefrom;
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both.

34. any Corporation, Company, staff, or individual violating the rights or law of anyone on
our land will be lien, both Company and personal.. this includes Fred’s Towing, and it’s
Employees, both Company and personal. we will not tolerate fraud or anyone hurting
moors on our land. liens will be set at ten (10-100) hundred million for individuals and
(150) million – 10 trillion for Corporations. all liens are in lawful money, gold and silver.
crimail and civil charges will be brought against all involve with my file..

35. 1 affirm that everything in this affidavit of truth, is right and truthful to the best of my
knowledge. i affirm to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth; and having
knowledge and firmly - established belief upon the historical, lawful, and adjudicated facts
contained herein. being competent (in my own proper person) to attest to this affidavit
upon which i place my autograph and thumbprint; whereas, i state, proclaim, and declare
the following to be true, not misleading.

36. Supreme Court Case Studies, Power of sale / Foreclosures :

Supreme Court Case Study: Suprerne Court of the 11ntteb 6tatco NICOLE BARONE,
Petitioner, V. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari
to the Florida Supreme Court PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI. File May 2 4 2018

Supreme Court Case Study: The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday unanimously ruled that
foreclosure lawyers are not debt collectors, ending a Colorado man’s years-long effort to gut
the state’s century-old public trustee foreclosure system.
As such, the attorneys representing Wells Fargo Bank in its efforts to foreclose on Dennis
Obduskey’s home in Bailey are not subject to comply with a broad array of consumer protections
mandated by the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, such as proving the bank actually
has the right to foreclose. No. 17–1307. Argued January 7, 2019—Decided March 20, 2019.
Law firm McCarthy & Holthus LLP was hired to carry out a nonjudicial foreclosure on a
Colorado home owned by petitioner Dennis Obduskey. McCarthy sent Obduskey

Page 12 of 13
correspondence related to the foreclosure. Obduskey responded with a letter invoking a federal

Page 13 of 13