Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
They are expected to be on call 24 hours a day to go out to crime scenes, frankly
when and where detectives are stumped. Some jurisdictions require the presence of a
criminalist at all major crime scenes. The services of a criminalist are used at the
beginning of a case. By contrast, the services of a forensic scientist are primarily used
at the end, or courtroom testimony phase, of a case. All crime lab employees must be
ready to offer expert testimony in court, however.
But the term was mostly forgotten until the 1960s when a series of cooperative
movements took place between police agencies and criminal justice or criminology
departments to establish criminalistics (Univ. of California) and forensic science
(Michigan State) college programs. Professors Paul Kirk in California and Ralph
Turner in Michigan (among many others) were pioneers in those movements.
1
accepted principles of established disciplines (like pathology, serology, toxicology,
odontology, and psychiatry) to the scientific examination of physical evidence.
The famous Locard Exchange Principle that "every contact leaves a trace" is
named for him, after Locard solved a strangling case by using fingernail scrapings. In
America, a few major cities and the FBI obtained crime labs during the 1930s, and by
the mid-1970's (the birth of criminal justice), 47 states had crime labs. A few criminal
justice programs that existed prior to the explosion of the field in 1974 offered a
criminalistics or forensic science concentration, but today, most criminal justice
programs only have one course in criminal investigation.
With federal police agencies, two organizations stand out above the rest, the
FBI and ATF, mainly because their crime labs are pretty much considered the tops in
the field and a model for elsewhere.
2
The FBI lab only handles violent crime, works exclusively for the prosecution, and is
considered the world's largest lab.
ATF crime lab handles Explosives, bombs, arsons (and does it well); Trace
evidence and deciphering firearms ownership and usage; Disaster response teams
(kind of like FEMA); Field support; and some Gang intelligence record keeping. ATF
labs are typically very high-tech and have always been accredited.
It's typical for a Crime Lab to have 4 divisions under a Director's Office: a
section dealing with anything pertaining to fluids, this being called a Serology
Division; a section dealing with unknown substances, drugs, or poisons, this being
called a Chemistry or Toxicology Division; a section dealing with anything so small,
like hairs or fibers, that they need to be looked at under a microscope, this being
called a Trace Evidence, Biology, or Microscopy Division; and a section dealing with
guns, weapons, instrumentation, or whatever, this being called a Ballistics, Firearms,
or Fingerprinting (Dusting and Lifting) Division (where Interns usually work). There
are about 350 crime laboratories in the U.S. and at least 80% of them are affiliated
with a police agency (where they typically hold bureau status in the organization).
The rest are located in the private sector and some of these are exemplary and known
for a particular specialty: Cellmark Diagnostics (for DNA), Battelle Corp. (for arson
cases), and Sirchie Corp. (for fingerprinting and trace evidence collection), to name a
few. There is a shortage of DNA laboratories since only 120 labs are set up to do
DNA testing (Steadman 2002). Almost all labs in existence are forensic labs, where
"forensic" means the experts there are available to give courtroom opinions, but when
a lab is set up to receive evidence from ongoing criminal investigations, this is called
casework, and the lab is referred to as a casework lab.
Before any laboratory work is done, it must be ensured that the workplace is
clean and contamination free. Then, the evidence is visually inspected and properly
described to document its condition. Often, it will be photographed, weighed, and
sketched. Then, the laboratory worker (criminalist, crime lab technician, or forensic
scientist) will have to figure out what tests are appropriate, if sufficient amounts of the
evidence exist, properly dissect the portion to be tested, and properly prepare the
3
testing material (which might include the delicate mixing of numerous chemical
compounds), all the while continuing to document each step.
Only then does any testing begin. Some tests include as many as five or six
separate procedures, each of which must be properly performed and documented, the
evidence properly repackaged and relabeled, and once again transported to storage.
Only then does the lab worker engage in the process of interpreting what the
experiments have disclosed.
A report is prepared and the contents of that report must be precisely correct.
At the prosecutor's discretion, the evidence has to make it back to the police evidence
room, where it will be stored until he/she decides they want to use it or want more
testing performed, in which case it goes back to the crime lab. It should be fairly
evident that all this transportation of evidence gives rise to numerous possibilities for
error in the form of destruction, mishandling, and contamination.
4
In these tests, samples to be examined are given to a laboratory or particular
worker, but the results are already known by a test giver. There are two methods
employed in administering these tests, blind and known. In the blind test, the lab
worker doesn't know that a test is taking place; they think the evidence sample they
are working on is just another case. The open proficiency test is like an open book
exam. In addition, individual lab workers join associations to beef up their resumes.
The two main ones are the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS), the
American Board of Criminalistics (ABC).
Physical evidence is part of the "holy trinity" for solving crimes -- physical
evidence, witnesses, and confessions. Without one of the first two, there is little
chance of even finding a suspect. In homicide and sexual assault cases, physical
evidence is the number one determinant of guilt or innocence.
When a number of details are put together (as in points of comparison), so that
they constitute a class of one (by itself), they are said to establish an identity, also
called individual characteristics, or entities in a class by itself. At this point, if there
are similarities between evidence from the crime scene and evidence from a suspect,
the expert can say, without a doubt, that identity has been individualized.
5
characteristics or combinations of class and individual characteristics) by which a
thing is recognizable or known. Identity is the same as pattern. A pattern is
established, for example, when a particular piece of class evidence like fiber (for
which there are large quantities in the population) is put together with another piece of
class evidence like red hair (which usually only exists in the subpopulation of white
people).
This kind of (true) match allows the examiner to say that, because the
similarities outweigh any dissimilarities, the crime scene (unknown or questioned)
sample "did come from the same source" as the suspect's (known or exemplar)
sample, which is sufficient, most of time, for proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Reliability and integrity are enhanced if the examiner has conducted tests on standards
using controls. A standard is the opposite of exemplar.
6
sample), or items used for calibration purposes kept in stock at the lab (reference
sample). The astute student may notice that the word "match" is used a couple of
different ways in criminalistics.
Nobody uses the phrase (true) match, for example, like I have used in my
explanations above. Some people prefer the term "matching" (Ramsland 2001). Abuse
of the term "match" is even worse in forensic science, which allows different
disciplines to set their own criteria and standards. To wrap things up, let's conclude
with an interesting topic -- the points of comparison method - and then attempt to
present a table which classifies evidence by their class and individual characteristics.