Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
The total cost for this service is proposed to be $5,889,496.92 which will be fully explained later
in this document. The full service delivery proposal essentially expands the service area for
Redwood City Fire Department (RCFD) to include San Carlos. This will provide for the staffing
of two engine companies, Truck Company services, Fire Prevention services, and for general
oversight and management to be provided by the Redwood City Command and support staff for
San Carlos. The economic advantage will be achieved through the reduction of BSCFD
Command and associated staff including the Fire Chief, Battalion Chiefs (3), Fire Marshal, Fire
Inspectors (2), and Administrative staff. It is recommended that this process be conducted
through attrition to reduce the impact to the current BSCFD employees and ensure a smooth
transition. The costs described below do not include the attrition of BSCFD employees. The
attrition costs are the responsibility of San Carlos and will need to be identified during the
contract development process.
Administrative and support activities will be provided by Redwood City Fire Department
administrative staff which includes the Fire Chief, one Administrative Assistant, one
Administrative Secretary and one Secretary working out of Redwood City Fire Administration
Offices (755 Marshall Street). Administrative and management support is provided by one of the
Battalion Chiefs assigned to rotating 24 hour shifts.
This proposal also includes the cost of one fulltime Fire Inspector assigned to San Carlos as well
as the associated overhead and Fire Marshal oversight costs. The Fire Marshal will be located at
Redwood City Fire Administration (755 Marshall Street). The fire prevention workload for San
Carlos will need to be analyzed to determine if addition capacity is required to be added to fully
serve the needs of San Carlos. Some of the services to evaluate are; plan checking, permit
management, fire code enforcement, public education, fire investigation services etc.
Training
This proposal includes training services provided by a Redwood City Battalion Chief assigned to
the Training Division. The services provided will include the full array of mandatory training
including, but not limited to: personnel development, fireground operations, emergency
management, confined space, apparatus operations, safety, live fire training, and other subject
matter as needed by the organization. Redwood City and Belmont San Carlos Fire personnel
already share an excellent working relationship. Training activities, schedule coordination, and
City of Redwood City Core Purpose:
Build a great community together.
Methodology
In an attempt to provide a comprehensive picture of fire service delivery costs, this proposal
bundles all costs associated with the support and direct delivery of emergency response. The
figures are intended to represent a “total cost of ownership”. The budget for Redwood City Fire is
predictable in that overhead costs are annualized and we have developed replacement plans for
most types of capital equipment as well as for smaller items. Although this is not an exact
representation of what the absolute cost of delivery will be, it represents all costs anticipated that
go beyond salary and benefit comparisons. All costs are calculated using Redwood City Fire
Department salary schedule and Budget for Fiscal year 2011/2012.
A linear approach was applied to position costs. For instance, because the predictable overhead
has been included in the total cost of deployment, a Battalion Chief position is represented at the
same rate as a firefighter through averaging. This may appear as an over generalization, but
because the firefighter position requires supervision by a Captain, and the Captain requires
supervision and management provided by the Battalion Chief, a piece of the overall budget for
each position is distributed to the other positions.
The cost of deployment described in this document is generated from daily staffed positions. A
daily staffed position consists of three platoons (A, B, C) necessary to cover the position every
day of the year plus a backfill factor of 16%. We do not know what the productive work time
(time spent at work minus leave) factor is for the BSCFD workforce, so we applied a calculation
based upon our experience over several years in Redwood City. The deployment costs also
include general liability insurance, workers compensation cost projections and other internal
services currently provided by other Redwood City departments/divisions;
• City Manager (as the central reporting point for the fire chief and for oversight)
• City Clerk
• City Attorney
• Finance Department
• Apparatus Maintenance
• Facility Maintenance
• Human Resource Department
• Information Technology
Cost calculations for 24hour shift personnel with backfill factor of 16%
24hour Battalion Chief
Cost
+ 16% backfill
Rank (Base Total Cost
(OT rate x 467 hrs)
Salary+Fringe)
Battalion Chief $248,477.00 $24,405.42 $272,882.42
Annualized cost to staff one 24-Hour Battalion Chief position : $818,647.26
(1) Calculate average 'cost per seat' by adding together Administration budget (62210), Operations
Budget (62220) and the salary costs for Training Chief (.33 BC) and EMS Chief (.33 BC).
Then divide this total by 18 (RCF's Minimum Daily Staffing number)
2011/12 BC Position salary+fringe+backfill: $272,882.42
.33 BC (TO) = $90,051.20
. .33 BC(EMS) = $90,051.20
Subtotal of EMS and TO positions= (A) $180,102.40
Administration Budget (62210) = (B) $908,571.00
Operations Budget (62220) = (C) $13,671,733
Total cost of A thru C = $14,760,406.40
To get avg. cost per seat, divide by 18 = $820,022.58
$5,889,496.92
* Fully -burdened cost with overhead includes B/C’s (Training, EMS, Operations) and Admin Support.
** Truck Company costs are calculated by spreading the cost of coverage by fire station district.
Redwood City has five districts and the proposal for coverage in San Carlos will add two, bringing the total number of districts
to be covered by Redwood City to seven. Since the cost of Truck service is calculated per district cost,
th
San Carlos’ share will be 2/7 of Redwood City’s total cost of coverage.
Fire Stations
This proposal does not include upgrades or repairs to San Carlos Fire Stations or other associated
facilities. It is anticipated that the Fire Stations will remain the responsibility of the city of San
Carlos and the Fire Service provider will not be responsible for their upkeep or repair. It is also
anticipated that the City of Redwood City will not be charged rent for use of these facilities. City
of San Carlos shall maintain stations in a similar fashion to existing conditions, and consistent
with the working environment of Redwood City fire stations. Mandated and safety upgrades
shall be provided by the City of San Carlos.
Redwood City assumes no financial or ownership responsibility for the Truck currently under
contract to be constructed for BSCFD. Fire apparatus provided by San Carlos will be maintained
by Redwood City’s fleet management program. San Carlos will be responsible for all initial
repairs to bring San Carlos apparatus into alignment with the level of condition and preventive
maintenance provided to Redwood City apparatus. San Carlos shall provide for maintenance and
replacement of fire apparatus at the same intervals as Redwood City apparatus. There will be no
difference between risk management and maintenance practices between apparatus stationed in
San Carlos or Redwood City.
Emergency Preparedness
This proposal does not include emergency preparedness (also referred as “Disaster
preparedness”) oversight, training or implementation. Redwood City will work with San Carlos
staff to analyze emergency preparedness needs for the city and will work with officials to
prioritize programs or elements deemed necessary for implementation.
Transition Costs
Each of the costs expressed in this document are considered “go-forward” costs, which means
that transition costs have not been developed for workforce assimilation, infrastructure and
apparatus repair/replacement, technology integration/upgrades, etc. This can only be done when
specific services and expectations are defined.
Term
The term of this proposed contract is three years from the time it is executed by both parties.
The total cost of this proposal will increase annually by 5%. If there are unforeseen costs
incurred by Redwood City due to such things as CalPERS rate increases or new state mandates,
the parties agree to renegotiate the annual increase to capture these unanticipated expenses.
Employees
The impact of this process to the current employees of the Belmont San Carlos Fire Department
cannot be ignored. It is Redwood City’s intention to minimize the impact as much as possible,
but no guarantees about employment are provided in this proposal. Some of the economies
contained in this proposal can only be achieved through a reduction of the current BSCFD
workforce, such as those positions associated with the reduction of the current 24-hour Battalion
4 BC position (3), fourth firefighter position on T13 when T13 converts to E13 (3); one Fire
Inspector (1); reduction of one secretary (1); and reduction of the Fire Chief (1).
The hiring process will involve Redwood City interviewing existing BSCFD employees for
potential employment by the City of Redwood City. Redwood City will utilize an existing
“lateral” hiring process and all potential employees will be subject to all of the conditions of the
process including pre-employment screening and medical evaluation. The specific number of
BSCFD employees employed by Redwood City will be determined after the preliminary hiring
process is concluded. It is anticipated that the actual number hired will be between 18 and 21
suppression personnel and one fire prevention personnel.
Consideration will be provided to allow former BSCFD employees to retain former leave
balances, but San Carlos will be responsible to fund these liabilities upon transition. Future leave
allowances will be provided with recognition to total time in service, but seniority, for the sake
of bumping, and lay-off, will start with employment by the City of Redwood City. Specifics of
assimilation of BSCFD employees into RCFD will need to be defined during the contract
development process.
Administrative Oversight
The control of administrative oversight, emergency operations and routine fire service functions
for the City of San Carlos will be managed by the Redwood City Fire Chief. The Fire Chief
reports directly to the City Manager of Redwood City for budget, management, emergency
response and system delivery. San Carlos and Redwood City officials will need to work out
specifics of lines of authority and chain of command between the two Cities. During the
November 3, 2010 proposer’s meeting it was mentioned that the successor fire chief would
“have a seat at the table” with other San Carlos department heads. This may be an appropriate
and constructive method to keep the needs of San Carlos in the forefront, but will not work as a
budget management process. Rates established by Redwood City will need to be negotiated
between the City of San Carlos and the Redwood City Manager and City Council.