Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
KEY WORDS Xerophthalmia, Northeast Brazil, children, regional distribution, seasonal var-
iation
The American Journal ofClinical Nutrition 38: JULY 1983, pp 139-144. Printed in USA I 39
© 1983 American Society for Clinical Nutrition
140 SANTOS ET AL
tables ( 1 1), as well as information regarding the child’s
one town (Mamanguape) was drawn from the sugar cane
region, whereas the other (Bayeux) represents the poorest immunization status and recent history of illness.
suburban area of the largest city, the state capital. In the
transitional area the town selected was Esperan#{231}a, and Results
in the Sert#{226}o three towns were studied: Itaporanga,
Conceic#{227}o, and Pianc#{243}. The results presented in Table I refer to
In the smallest localities, all children from 0 to 12 yr observations made during the harvest season
old were examined in door-to-door visits; in the other
and show clear regional clustering of xer-
towns a systematic, quasi random sampling of house-
holds was done in a proportion varying from one-half to
ophthalmia in the state of Paraiba; the scm-
one-fourth, depending of the size of the town. iarid region, the Sert#{227}o,is the only one where
During a first phase, localities were studied during clinical signs of vitamin A deficiency were
the harvest season, and in a second round of observations found during that period. The difference in
(about 6 months later) data were collected during the
distribution of conjunctival xerosis with Bitot
interharvest season for only one town in each ecological
region; the data collection corresponded to the period
spot (X1B) between the Sert#{227}oand the other
from July of 1981 to March of 1982. two areas presented a very high statistical
The eye examination was performed in daylight by significance (p < 0.001). In the Scrt#{227}o,the
previously trained health professionals (from the ne- distribution of xerophthalmia in children was
search team); the suspected cases were reexamined by a
rather homogeneous among the three locali-
TABLE 1
Regional Distribution of xerophthalmia in
0- to 12-yr old children
. No ofclinical signs
Region No of
locality children
XN XIB X2 XS
Coastal
Mamanguape 751 0 1 0 0
Bayeux 689 0 0 0 0
Total 1440 0 1 0 0
Transitional
Esperan#{231}a 1431 0 0 0 0
Sert#{227}o
Itaporanga 1566 2 6 0 1
Conceic#{226}o 1831 3 13 1 1
Pianc#{243} 1594 4 10 0 3
Total 4991 9 29 1 5
XEROPHTHALMIA IN NORTHEAST BRAZIL 141
TABLE 2
Age distribution of xerophthalmia
cases-SertAo area
No of clinical signs
No of
Age group children
XN XIB X2 XS
Preschool 2802 5 8 0 3
(0-59 mo)
Schoolage 2189 4 21 1 2
(60-143 mo)
Total 4991 9 29 1 5
TABLE 3
Seasonal variation of xerophthalmia in
preschool children
No of clinical signs
No of
Region/period children
XN XIB X2 XS
TABLE 4
Seasonal variation of xerophthalmia in
school children
No of clinical signs
No of
Region/period children
XN XIB X2 XS
Sert#{227}o(Itaporanga)
Harvest 649 1 2 0 1
Interharvest 759 2 13 0 0
D
. 4) U
U C)
0 C C
C
0 0
0 C C
C 0 0
C .
‘(< a0’
.E . .9
_E
a.B: CCO.-.CCCCCCCC
.- . > on no- - ti D.Q bO OD O O D
.-
-- U.............. ___
. . .E .E . .E n . .E ...E
C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C)
000-0000----000--0
OS
C
bL
C C
: .!P
C
C)
: C
2
.
a C C)
.8 o U
.n C)
.‘&. n
.!P<
. .I z+ z
E > )<
+ +
#{149}:
5-
0
>
n
=.
nen
.
cnuun
. . . ‘
. : b
. #{128}#{128}. E1E
. C
C .-.Z-.-.Z - U
I!:
-L
Uo U
Cn
s0O
u Ca <
_J 0 N ‘ ‘PS i irs ri m irs in O
<
XEROPHTHALMIA IN NORTHEAST BRAZIL 143