Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
-'+
REMEDIAL LAW
mmemm@ryafid
Civil Procedure
Special Civil Actions
Special Proceedings
Criminal Procedure
Evidence
Special Laws
$en $rM @ollege of {lb
2O11 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
SUBJECT COMMITTEE:
RYAN MERCADER subject chair, MARTA DESIREE FEDERIO assistant subje{t chair, IVA FREYRITZ ERICA CAYABAN edp, JANNA MAE
TECSON and KRISTINE TUPAZ civil procedure, KAREN KRISTI LACAP special civil actiont MYRTLE CALVAN special proceedings. KIMBERLY
JOY BARAOIDAN criminal procedure, CRISALYN LUMANGLAS evidence, HANZEL SANTOS special laws
MEMBERS:
Ethel Joy Arriola, Glory Grace Arugay, Mark Joseph Ayo, Kriselle Balmes, Elizabeth Mae Bongalonta, Venice Buagnin, Diana Fajardo, lan
Daniel Galang, Erika Gallego. Nicole Rose MargaretJamilla, Frances Dyan Lim, Jane Kathyrine Lim, Ali Lorraine Manrique, Roniel Muioa
Kevin Averell Pangan, Rimiila Quinto, Beverly Quintos, Lee Realino Reyes, Lyndon Rutor, Ednalyn Saron, Carlo Tabalog Norliza
Villanueva, Jose Angelo David, Kamille Deanne Lagasca, Raynan Larosa
REMEDIAL LAW
INTRODUCTION
pro@edings before the trial court and withheld from the plenary powers of
invoked its authority by asking for an the court.
affirmative relief (Soliven vs. r LIMITED jurisdiction - Exercised over
Fastforms, lnc. G.R. No. 139031, Oct. and extends only to particular or
18,2004). specified cases.
{'+ j\ ].
One where the court, One that the court may t*'\,dr"*;-tu] ffi .s} l:-l J"'tSll
"*l;{* a-r" }i.-:8df
:" i..,;'
CLASSIFICATION OF JU RISDICTION
1. As to CASES Tried:
o GENERAL jurisdiction - Exercised
over all kinds of cases, excepf those
2
5an Felc @ollege ot Leb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
DOCTRINE OF ADHERENCE TO
JURISDICTION
(Also Known As Continuity of Jurisdiction)
Cannot be abolished May be abolished by Once jurisdiction has been acquired, the court
by Congress without Congress by just retains it untilthe final termination of the case.
amending the siniply repealing the
Constitution. lawwhich created General Rule: Law enacted during the
those courts.
pendency of a case which transfers jurisdiction
Ex. The Gourt of Tax to another court does not affect cases prior to
Appeals its enactment.
Exceptions:
SUPERIOR COURT vs. INFERIOR COURT 1. When the new law EXPRESSLY
SUPERIOR COURTS refer to those courts PROVIDES for a retroactive application;
which have the power of review or supervision 2. When the change of jurisdiction is
over another lower court while INFERIOR CURATIVE in character.
COURTS are those which, in relation to
another are lower in rank and subject to review EXCLUSIONARY PRINCIPLE
and supervision of the latter. The court first acquiring jurisdiction excludes
all others.
COURTS OF RECORD
Those whose proceedings are enrolled and DOCTRINE OF PRIMARY JURISDICTION
which are bound to keep a wriften record of all Under this doctrine, courts will not resolve a
trials and proceqdings handled by lhem. R.A. controversy involving a question which is
No. 6031 mandates all Municipal Trial Courts within the jurisdiction of an administrative
to be courts of record. tribunal, especially where the question
demands the exercise of sound administrative
POLICY OF JUDICIAL HIERARCHY discretion requiring the special knowledge and
This policy means that a higher court will not experience of said tribunal in determining
entertain direct resort to it unless the redress technical and intricate matters of fact (Villaflor
desired cannot be obtained in the appropriate vs. CA, G.R. No. 95694, Oct. 8, 1997).
courts.
DOCTRINE OF ANCILLARY JURISDICTION
While it is true that the SC, CA, and the RTC It involves the inherent or implied powers of
have concurrent original jurisdiction to issue the court to determine issues incidental to the
writs of Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus, exercise of its primary jurisdiction.
such concurrence does not accord litigants
unrestrained freedom of choice of the court to Under its aneillary jurisdiction, a court may
which the application for the writ may be determine all questions relative to the matters
directed. The application should be filed with brought before it, regulate the manner in which
the court of lower level unless the importance a trial shall be conducted, determine the hours
of the issue involved deserves the action of at which the witnesses and lawyers may be
the couft of higher level. money
"ry*
P50,000; of gains;
d. Supp-qdandktaekrowledgment;
5. lnclusion and exclusion of voters (Bp
881, Sec.138); X
f. "Pbtition tor de.qlantipnlffiKftatus c
6. Admiralty and maritime cases where iffidn,iiloRihffi r#i nvot
cn u nta rft
demand or claim does NOT exceed # {pqmr'ffir#ffiftS$HrF.nrl
P300,000 or in Metro Manita, does
NOT exceed P400,000;
7. Those covered by the Rules on
Summary Pr;ocedure:
ic
a. lorcible Entry and Unlawful F
petainer (FEUD)
with
REMEDIAL LAW
JURISDICTION
management of a Rehabilitation
Receiver or Management
Committee.
CONCURRENT With SC - Actions affecting ambassadors,
public ministers and consuls.
pursuant to Sec 4
of Rule 65.
Wth CA, the Sandrganbayan and RTC With GA, lhe Sandiganbayan and RTC
a.Petitions for issuance of Writ of c. Petitions for issuance of Writ of
Amparo; Amparo;
b.Petitions for Habeas Data, where d. Petitions for Habeas Data, where
the action involves public data or the action involves public data or
government office. govemment office.
With the CA , RTC and Sandiganbayan With CA only unless otherwise provided by
a.Petitions for certiorari, prohibition or law
mandamus against inferior courts a. Petitions for certiorari, prohibition
and other bodies; or mandamus against quasi-
b.Petitions for habeas corpus and quo judicialagencies {like CSC, CBM,
. warranto. CTA, etc.) (Amendments to Rule
65, A.M. No. 07-7-12-SC).
Wth RTC
Actions against ambassadors, other public With the dC, nfC and Sandiganbayan
ministers and consuls a. Petitions for certiorari, prohibition
or mandamus against inferior
courts and other bodies; and
b. Petitions for habeas corpus and
quo wananto.
APPELLATE Review, revise, reverse, modify, or affirm on Exclusive Appellate jurisdiction over all
appeal or certiorari the following: final judgments, decisions, resolutions,
a.All cases in which the orders or awards of RTC and quasi-judicial
constitutionality or validity of any agencies except those falling within the
treaty, international or executive appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Gourt
agreement, law, presidential decree, in accordance with the Constitution, Labor
proclamalion, order, instruc'tion, Code, .8.P. 129 and of subparagraph 1 of
ordinance or regulation is in the {- paragraph and subparagraph 4 of
question; the 4" paragraph of section 17 of the
b. All cases involving the legality of any Judiciary Act of 1948.
tax, impost, assessment, or toll, or
any penalty imposed in relation
thereto;
c. All cases in which the jurisdiction of
any lower court is in issue;
d. All criminal cases in which the
penalty imposed is reclusion
perpetua or higher;
e. All cases in which only an error or
question of law is involved
Petition for certiorari, prohibition and Actions for annulment of judgment of the
mandamus against Court of Appeals and Regional Trial Courts
Sandiganbayan. Crimes of Terrorism under Human Security
Act of 2007.
With the CA: petitions for certiorari, With the SC: petitions for certiorari, prohibition
prohibition and mandamus against the and mandamus against the RTC's.
RTC's.
With the CA and RTC: petitions for With the SC and RTC: petitions for certiorari,
certiorari, prohibition and mandamus prohibition and mandamus against the MTC's.
against the MTC's.
By petition for review on certiorari: By.Notice of Appeal:
r From the CA; From the RTC in the exercise of its original
. From lhe Sandiganbayan; iurisdiction, except those appealable to the
r From the RTC where only an error Sandiganbayan.
or question of law is involved.
From the RTC where penalty imposed is
Note: In People vs. Mateo, G.R. Nos. reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment or
14767&87, July 7, 2004 lhe Supreme where a lesser penalty is imposed but for
Court held that while the Fundamental Law offenses committed on the same occasion or
a mandatory review by the
requires which arose out of the same occurrence that
Supreme Court of cases where the penalty gave rise to the more serious offense for which
imposed is reclusion perpetua, life the penalty of death, reclusion perpetua, or life
imprisonment, or death, nowhere, however, imprisonment is imposed (Section 3 Rule 122
has it proscribed an intermediate review. lf as amended by AM. No.0O-U03-SC).
only to
ensure utmost circumspection
before the penalty of death, reclusion By automatic review (i.e. no notice of appeal is
perpetua or life imprisonment is imposed, necessary):
the Court now deems it wise and From the RTC, in cases wherein the death
compelling to provide in these cases a penalty is imposed.
review by the Court of Appeals before the
case is elevated to the Supreme Court. A
prior determination by the Court of Appeals the
on, particularly, the factual issues, would
minimize the possibility of an error of
judgment. lf the Court of Appeals should r;qli-{*#ffiffi #F LeW
affirm the penalty of death, reclusion
perpetua or life imprisonment, it could then
render judgment imposing the
conesponding penalty as the
circumstances so warrant, refrain from
entering judgment and elevate the entire
records of the case to the Supreme Court
for its final disposition.
REMEDIAL LAW
JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL 1. All cases involving custody, guardianship, legitimacy, paternity and filiation
arising under the Code of Muslim Personal Laws;
All cases involving disposition, distribution and settlement of estate of
deceased Muslims, probate of wills, issuance of lefters of administration or
appointment of administrators or executors regardless of the nature or
aggregate value ofthe property;
3. Petitions for the declaration of absence and death for the cancellation or
correction of entries in the Muslim Registries mentioned in Title Vl, Book Two
of the Code of Muslim Personal Laws;
4. All actions arising from the customary contracts in which the parties are
Muslims, if they have not specified which law shall govern their relations; and
All petitions for mandamus, prohibition, injunction, certiorari, habeas corpus,
dnd all other auxiliarv writs and in aid of its aDoellate
1.' Petitions by Muslim for the constitution of a family home, change of name and
cpmmitment of an insane person to an asylum;
2. All other personal and legal actions not mentioned in paragraph 1 (d) wherein
thb parties involved are Muslims except those for forcible entry and unlawful
detainer, which shall fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Municipal
Circuit Court, and
3. All special civil actions for interpleader or declaratory relief wherein the parties
are Muslims or the propertv involved belongs exclusively to Muslims.
Cases that can be filed 4
Offenses defined and punished under PD 1083
2. Disputes relating to :
a. Marriage
b. Divorce
c. Betrothal or breach of contrac{ to marry
d. Customary dower (mahr)
e. Disposition and distribution of property upon divorce
f. Maintenance and support,
S. Consolatory gifts (muf'a) and
h. restitution of marital rights
Disputes relative to communal properties.
10
$an Fetu @otlege of Ltu
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Applicability
1. Civil Action - one by which a party sues
another for the enforcement or protection
SECTION 1. TITLE OF THE RULES of a right or the prevention or redress of a
wrong.
The Rules of Court DO NOT HAVE retroactive
effect. They can, however, be made A civil action may either be ORDINARY
applicable to cases pending at the time of their
OR SPECIAL, BOTH are governed by the
passage and therefore are retroactive in that
rules for ordinary civil actions, SUBJECT
sense.
to the specific rules prescribed for a
special civil action.
The rule-making power of the Supreme Court
has the following limitations:
1. Simplified and inexpensive procedure for
2. Griminal Action - one by which the State
prosecutes a person for an act or omission
the speedy disposition of cases; punishable by law.
2. Uniform for all courts of the same grade;
and
3. Shall not diminish, increase or modify 3. Special Proceedings - a remedy by
which a party seeks to establish a gtatus,
substantive rights (Arf. Vlil Sec. S[S], 19A7
a gight, or a particular fact (SRP).
Phil. Constitution).
Glassifi cation of Actions
o ln the interest of just and expeditious
proceedings, the Supreme Court may B. As to Nature
suspend the application of the Rules of
Court and except a case from its
operation because the Rules were Governed by ordinary AIso governed by
rules. ordinary rules but
precisely adopted with the primary SUBJECT to specific
objective of enhancing fair trial and rules prescribed
expeditious justice.
A right possessed
by one against
another.
One party prosecutes The moment said
another for the claim is filed before
enforcement or a court, the claim is
protection of a right or converted into an
the prevention or action or suit.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE:
EZEKIEL JOSHUA VILLENA overall chairperson, MINISTER MOISES DU chairperson for academics. DJOANIVIE JOMARE JUNASA
chairperson for hotel operations, MARIE MICAELA STA. ANA vice<hairperson for operations, MIKHAIL MAVERICK TUMACDER vice.
chairperson for secretariat, JACKIE Lou LAMUG vice_chairperson for ffnince, DIANA lren ruezoru vicechairperson for edp. JASSEN
RALPH LEE vice-chairperson for logistics
SUBJECT COMMITTEE:
RYAN MERCADER subject chair. MARTA DESIREE FEDERIo assisrant subject chair, tvA FREyRtrz ERtcA CAYABAN edp, JANNA MAE
TECSON and KRISTINE TUPAZ ciMI procedure, KAREN KRlSTl LACAP special civil actions, MYRILE CALVAN special proceedings, KIMBERLY
JOY BARAOIDAN criminal procedure, CRISALYN LUMANGI-AS evidence, HANZEL SANTOS special laws
MEMBERSI
Ethel Joy Arriola. Glory Grace Arugay, Mark Joseph Ayo, Kriselle Balmes, Elizabeth Mae Bongalonta, Venice Buagnin, Diana Fajardo, lan
Daniel Galang, Erika Gallego, Nicole Rose MargaretJamilla, Frances Dyan Lim, Jane Kathyrine Lim, AIi Lorraine Manrique, Roniel Murioa
Kevin Averell Pangan, Ramiila Quinto, Beverly Quintos, Lee Realino Reyes, Lyndon Rutor, Ednalyn Saron, Carlo Tabaloc, Norliza
blfrrleri-a Joe Angelo David, lGmille Deanne Lagasca, Raynan Larosa
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIT PROCEDURE
Ex. Action
for a sum of
t2
Sm Febu Gollege of LEb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
secrrof 4. IN WHAT CASES NOT been left for dete.rmination by the court,
APPLICABLE the additional filing fee therefor shall
constitute a lien on the judgment.
NOT APPLICABLE lN: {ELCaNio)
1. llection Cases; . The amount of damages should be
2. land registration/qdastral cases; specified not onlY in the bodY of the
3. [aturalization; pleading but also in the PraYer.
4. lnsolvency proceedings; . lf the complete amount of the docket fee is
5. Qther cases not provided in the Rules of not paid, the prescriptive period continues
Court. to run as the complaint is deemed not filed
(Feria, 2001, p. 208).
Exception: The Rules of Court are applicable . An action can be commenced by filing the
to the above cases by analogy or in a complaint by registered mail. ln which
s u p pl eto ry ch a racte r and when eve r practicab e
I
case, it is the date of mailing that is
and convenient. considered as the date of filing and not the
date of the receipt thereof by the clerk of
SECTION 5. COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION court.
13
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
14
9en Fcls GoIIege ot leb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
15
EIALLAW
@il.PROCHX'RE
One need not be a natural or a juridical person Real Party-in-lnterest is the party who stands
to be a party to a civil action. As long as an to be benefited or injured by the judgment in
entity is authorized by law to be a party, such the suit or the party entitled to the avails of the
entity may sue, be sued or both (Riano, 2007, suit.
p.179).
Note: To be a real party-in-interest, the
Note: Entities authorized by law to be parties interest must be 'real', which is a presenf
to a suit include: substantial interest as distinguished from a
1. The estate of a deceased person; mere expectancy or a future, contingent
2. A political party incorporated under Act
subordinate or consequential interest.
1459 (now 8.P. Btg. 69, Corporation
Code); and ln Oposa vs- Factoran (G.R. No. 101083,
3. A registered labor union (Sec. 243, pD 1993/, minors represented by their parents
442, Labor Code), with respect to its were held as real parties in interest to file an
property. action to annul timber licenses issued by the
state under the following principles:
As to properties of the Roman Catholic a. lnter-generational responsibility;
Church, the Archbishop of the diocese to b. lnter-generational justice;
which they belong may be a party (Versoza vs. c. The right of the Filipinos to a balanced and
Fernandez, G.R. No. L-25254, Nov" 22, 1926). healthfulecology; and
d. Minors represent themselves and the
16
' 9m Ftls Gstlegt of Lclo
2O1I CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
an action (must he joined under all Where the action is allowed to be prosecuted
conditions). or defended by a representative or $omeone
acting in a fiduciaqi capacity, the beneficiary
Necessary parties - Those who are not shall be included in the title of the case ad
indispensable but ought to bb joined as shall be deemed to be the real party-in-
parties if complete relief is to be accorded interest.
as to those already parties, or for a
complete determination or settlement of An agent may sue or be sued without joining
the claim subject of the aclion (may or his principal except when the contract involves
may not be joined). things belonging to the principal.
L7
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Only when the party ordered to implead the SECTION 10. UNW|LLING CO.PLAIXTIFF
indispensable party refuses or fails to do so
shall the case be dismissed, on the ground of lf the consent of any party who should be
disobedience to the Rules or orders of the joined as plaintiff cannot be obtained, he may
court under Sec. 3 of Rule 17. be made a defendant and the reason therefore
shall be stated in the complaint.
The absence ofan indispensable party
renders all subsequent actuations of the court SECTION 1'1. MISJOINDER AND NON.
null and void for want of authority to act not JOINDER OF PARTIES
only as to the absent parties but even as to
those present. A party is MISJOINED when he is made a
party to the action although he should not be
SECTION 8. NECESSARY PARTY impleaded.
Also called PROPER PARTIES - those whose A party is NOT JOINED when he is supposed
presence is necessary to adjudicate the whole to be joined but is not impleaded in the action
controversy, but those interests are so far (Riano,2007, p. 195).
separable that a final decree can be made in
their absence without affecting them Neither misjoinder nor non-joinder of parties is
(Quisumbing vs. CA, G.R. No. 93339 Sepf. a ground for dismissal of the action.
13,1990).
Exception: Secflon 7, Rule 3 in relation to the
The non-inclusion of a necessary party does disobedience to the rules or order of the court
not prevent the court from proceeding with the for the inclusion of an indispensable party.
action and the judgment therein shall be
without prejudice to the rights of such Note:Objections to defects in parties should
necessary party not impleaded. be made at the earliest opportunity, r.e., the
moment such defect becomes apparent, by a
Joint Debtor - He is an indispensable party in MOTION TO STRIKE THE NAMES OF THE
a suit against him but a necessary party in a PARTIES impleaded. Objedtions to misjoinder
suit against his co-debtor. cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.
Solidary Debtor - ln a suit brought by a sEcTtoN 12. CLASS SU|T
creditor against one solidary debtor, the other
solidary debtor is NEITHER indispensabte nor
a necessary party.
and
SECTION 9. NON-JOINDER OF
NECESSARY PARTIES TO BE PLEADED
18
5sr Fels €ollege of Let!
2O11 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
3. Parties bringing the class suit are SECTION 15. ENTITY WTHOUT JURIDICAL
SUFFICIENT IN NUMBER AND PERSONALITY AS DEFENDANT
REPRESENTATIVE of the class and can
fully protect the interests of all concerned; Requisites: (TED)
and 1. There are lwo or more persons not
4. The representative sues or defends for the organized as a juridical entity;
benefit of all. 2. They gnter into a transaction; and
3. A wrong or g[elict is committed against a
Note: A taxpayer's suit or a stockholder's third person in the course of
such
derivative suit is in the nature of a class suit, transaction.
although subject to the other requisites of the
corresponding goveming law especially on the Persons associated in an entity without
issue of locus sfandl (Regalado p. 97). juridical personality may be sued under the
. Any party in interest shall have the right to
name by which they are generallY or
commonly known, but they cannot sue under
intervene to protect his individual interest. such name.
(Ihls rb an instance when a person may
intervene as a matter ot risht). The service of summons may be effected
upon all the defendants by serving upon any of
them, or upon the person in charge of the
office or place of business maintained under
There is one single There are multiple such name (Section 8, Rule 14).
cause of action causes of action
pertaining to numerous separately belonging to
INSTANCES WHERE SUBSTITUTION OF
persons. several persons.
PARTIES IS PROPER
19
REMEDIAL LAW
CMIL PROCEDURE
Note: lf the action does not survive (like A transferee pendente lite:
purely personal actions of support, annulment 1. Stands in exactly the same position as
of marriage and legal separation), the court its predecessor-in-interest, the original
shall simply dismiss the case. Substitution will defendant; and
not be required (Riano, 2007, p. 200). 2. Bound by the proceedings had in the
case before the propefi was
B. SECTION 17. DEATH OR SEPARATION transferred to it, even if not formally
OF A PARTY WHO IS A PUBLIC included as a defendant. (Henera,
OFFICER voLl p.405)
20
9m Feta @ollr$e of I.sb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
2l
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
An action may be filed only when the case SECTION 2. MEANING OF TERMS
involves:
a. Personal status of plaintiff -Venue: Rules on Summary Procedure (Givil Cases)
Where plaintiff resides; and
b. Any property of said defendant located Filing of verified
complaint with the MTC
in the Phil. Venue: Where the
-
property or any portion thereof is
situated or found.
Court may dismiss
the case outright
The Supreme Court has the power to order a
change of venue to prevent a miscarriage of
justice.
#.&s{ ffiW#Pr
:.\a* & lLrilt
22
$en Fela Gdlege of Leb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
23
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
b. The parties thereto agree to submit complaint in court or any government office for
their differences to amicable adjudication. (1 0 days to repudiate)
settlement by an appropriate lupon;
Rules on Venue under the Katarungang
7. Such other classes of disputes which the Pambanngayl-aw
president may determine in the interest of 1. Disputes between residents of the same
justice; and barangay shall be brought for settlement
8. Where one of the parties is a iuridical before lupon of said barangay.
entity. 2. Residents of difierent barangays within the
same city or municipality - ln the barangay
Note: The court in which non-criminal cases where the respondent or any of the
not falling within the authority of lhe lupon are respondents reside at the election of the
filed may, at any time before trial, motu proprio complainant.
refer the case to the lupon concerned for 3. Disputes involving real property or any
amicable settlement. interest therein - Where real property or
larger portion thereof is situated.
While the dispute is under mediation, 4. Disputes arising at the WORKPLACE
conciliation, or arbitration, the prescriptive where the contending parties are
periods for offenses and cause of action under employed or at the |NST|TUT|ON,where
existing laws shall be intemtpted upon filing of such parties are enrolled for study - ln the
the complaint with lhe punong barangay. barangay where such workplace or
Such interruption sfra// NOT exceed 60 days institution located.
from the time of the filing of the comptaint with
the punong barangay. Note: Please refer to the special laws on the
salient features of the law and on Katarungang
The pafties may go directly to court in the Pambarangay Chart.
following instances (PROCEDURAL
Exeeptions: CHAS LACT)
1. Where the accused is under police
gustody or detention;
2. Where the person has otherwise been SECTION 1. PLEADINGS DEFINED
deprived of personal liberty calling , for
fiabeas corpus proceeding; Pleadings are the written statements of the
3. Where the gctions are coupled with respective claims and defenses of the parties
provisional remedies such as preliminary
injunction, attachment, delivery of
submitted to the court fbr appropriate
judgment.
personal property, and support
pendente lite; Purpose of pleadings: (AlD)
4. Where the action may otherwise be barred 1. To apprise the Court of the rival claims in
by the gtatute of limitations; a judicial controversy submitted for trial
5. labor Disputes (Montoya vs. Escayq G.R. and decision;
No. 82211-12, March
21,1989);
6. Actions to annul judgment upon a
compromise (Sanchez vs. Tupaz,
G.R. No. 76690, Feb.21, 19BB).
7. QARL disputes; and
8. Disputes involving the lraditions of
indigenous cultural community.
24
9nu Fete @ollcge of Lsb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Ultimate facts refer to the essential facts lnsufficient denial or denial amounting to
constituting the plaintifPs cause of action. admissions
1. Generaldenial; and
A fact is essenfia/ if it cannot be stricken out
without leaving the statement of the cause of
action insufficient.
25
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
26
5un Fell GoIIege of L^tu
2O11 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Against a
peison not a Note:
party to the
action.
c
deem
Must arise out May arise out Must be in tn
of the of or be respect of the
an
transaction necessarily opponent's
that is the connecled (Plaintiff) to file
subject matter with the claim.
of the original transaction or
action or of a the subject
counterclaim matter of the
therein. opposing
party's claim,
27
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
sEGnoN {1. THTRD (FOURTH, ETC.) _ SEGTION 12. BRINGING NEW PARTIES
PARTY COMPLAINT
Distinguished from a Third-party complaint
Third -
Party Comptaint is a claim that a A third-party complaint is proper when not one
defending party may, with leave of court, file of the third-party defendants therein is a party
against a person not a party to the aciion for to the main action. lf one or more of the
gontribution, lndemnity, gubrogation or gny defendants in a counterclaim or cross-claim is
other relief (CISA), in respect of his already a party to the action, then the other
opponent's claim. There could also be a necessary parties may be brought in under
fourth, etc.; - party complaint with the same ' this section.
purpose and function.
SECTION 13.
ANSWER THIRDTO
Tests to determine whether the third-party (FOURTH, ETC.) - PARTY COMPLAINT
complaint is in respect of plaintiff's claim
1. Whether it aiises out of the same
transaction on which the plaintiff's claim is
based, or although arising out of another
or different transaction, is connected with PARTS OF A PLEADING
the plaintiffs claim;
2. Whether the third-party defendant would SECTION 1. CAPTION
be liable to the plaintiff or to the defendant
for all or part of the plaintiffs claim against The Caption contains the following:
the original defendant; and 1. The name of the court;
3. Whether the third-parg defendant may 2. The title of the action; and
assert any defenses which the third-party 3. The docket number if assigned.
plaintiff has or may have to the ptaintiffs
claim. SECTION 2. THE BODY
28
9en Fe[a Gollege ot Ltr
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Disciplinary action on counsel in the 9. Petition for Review from the RTC to the
following cases: Supreme Court (See Sec. 2[c], Rule 41,
1. Deliberately filing an unsigned pleading; Rules of Civil Procedure)
2. Deliberately signing a pleading in violation 10. Petition for Review from RTC to Court of
of the Rules; Appeals (See Sec. 1, Rule 42, Rules of
3. Alleging scandalous or indecent matter in CivilProcedure)
the pleading; or 11. Petition for Review under Rule 43, from
4. Failing to promptly report a change of his CTA and other quasi-judicial agencies to
address. Court of Appeals (See Sec. 5, Rule 43,
Rules of Civil Procedure)
SECTION 4. VERIFICATION 12. Appeal by Certiorari under Rule 45, from
Court ofAppeals to Supreme Court
Pleadings need NOT be verified
EXCEPT (See Sec. 7, Rule 45, Rules of Civil
when othenryise provided by the law or rules. Procedure)
13. Petition for Certiorari (special civil ac{ion)
How a pleading is verified: By an affidavit under Rule 64 (See Sec. 2, Rule 64, Rules
that the affiant: of Civil Procedure)
'l. Has read the pleading; and 14. Petition for Certiorari (special civil action)
2. That the allegations therein are true and under Rule 65 (See Sec. 7, Rule 65, Rules
correct of his personal knowledge or of Civil Procedure)
based on authentic documents. 15. Petition for Prohibition under Rule 65
(See Sec. Rule 65, Ru/es 'of Civil
2,
r The purpose of requiring a verification is to Procedure)
secure an assurance that the allegations '16. Petition for Mandamus under Rule 65
of the petitioi nave been made ii good (See Sec. Rule 65, Rules of Civil
3,
faith, or are true and correct, not merely Procedure)
speculative (Sarmiento v. Zaratan, G.R. 17. Petition for
appointment of guardian
No. 167471, February 5, 2A07). (See Sec. 2, Rule 93, Rules of Court)
18. Petition for leave filed by guardian to sell
List of pleadings that should be VERIFIED or encumber property of an estate
(NOT EXCLUSTVE) (See Sec. 1, Rule 95 Ru/es of Court)
1. Civil complaints or initiatory pleadings 19. Petition for declaration of competency of a
asserting claims for relief (including ward (See Sec. /, Rule 97, Rules of Court)
permissive counter-claims). (See Sec. 5, 20. Petition for habeas corpus (See Sec. 3,
Rule 7, Rules of Civil Procedure) Rule 102, Rules of Court)
2. Statement of Claim for Small Claims 21. Petition for change of name (See Sec. 2,
Cases, as well as the Response thereto Rule 103, Rules of Court)
(See Secs. 5 & 11, Rules of Procedure for 22. Petition for voluntary judicial dissolution of
SmallClaims Cases) a corporation (See Sec. 1, Rule 105,
3. Complaint for injunction (See Sec. 4, Rule Rules of Court; see also Sec. 119,
5fl Rules of Civil Procedure) Corporation Code)
4. Application for appointment of receiver 23. Petition for cancellation or correction of
(SeeSec. 1, Rule 59, Rules of Civil entries in Rule 108
Procedure)' See
Application for support pendente lite
(See Sec. 1, Rule 69, Rules of Civil
Procedure)
6. Petition for forcible entry or unlaMul
detainer, the answers thereto, and the
answers to any compulsory counter-claim
and cross-claim pleaded in the
answer (See Sec. 4, Rule 70, Rules of
CivilProcedure)
7. Petition for indirect contempt (See Sec. 4,
Rule 71, Rules of Civil Procedure)
8. Petition for relief from judgment or order.
(See Sec. 3, Rule 38, Rules of Civil
Procedure)
29
h
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
TEST to determine the presence of forum the case, without prejudice, unless othenrvise
shopping: Whether in the two (or more) cases provided, upon motion (not motu proprio) and
pending, there is identity in terms of the after hearing.
following:
1. Parties or identity of interests represented Effect of Submission of False Certification
(Cf. Fkst Phil. lntemational Bank, et at. vs. or Non4ompliance with the Undertakings
C.A., G.R. No. 115849, January 24, 1996); Therein
2. Rights or causes of action; and 1. lndirect contempt; and
3. Relief sought. 2. Without prejudice to the filing of
aCministrative and criminal actions against
. The. certificate is to be executed by the counsel.
petitioner, and not by counsel, unless the
latrer is specifically authorized to do so. , Effect of Willful and Deliberate Forum
Shopping
Ratio: The party himself has actual knowledge 1. Shall be ground for summary dismissal of
or knows better than anyone else, whether he the case with prejudice; and
has initiated similar actions in other courts 2. Direct contempt, as well as a cause for
agencies or tribunals (Riano, 2007, p. 56). administrative sanctions.
Note: The certificate of non-forum shopping is Evidentiary Facts refer to those which are
a mandatory requirement in filing a compliint necessary to prove the ultimate fact or which
and olher initiatory pleadings assLrting a ctaim furnish evidence of the"existence of some
or relief (Sec. 5, Rule 7, Rutes of Court). other facts.
f!e96 initiatory pteadings inctude not onty the Test to Distinguish Conclusion of Law from
original complaint but also: Statement
1. Permissivecounterclaim;
2. Cross-claim;
3. Third (fourth, etc.) - party cornptaint;
4. Complaint-in-intervention; and
5. Petition or application wherein the party
asserts his claim for relief.
30
Ssn Felu @ollege ot 1[.ub
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Facts that may be Averred Generally: (CGC 2. By setting forth what is elaimed to be the
LeMJO) facts.
I
L Gonditions precedent (BUT there must still
be an allegation that the specific condition Where the actionable document is properly
precedent has been complied with, alleged, the failure to specifically deny
otherwise, it will be dismissed for lack of under oath the same rcsults in:
cause of action; Sec. 3); 1. The admission of the genuineness and
2. Capacity to sue or be sued (Sec. 4); due execution of said document, EXCEPT
3. Qapacity to sue or be sued in a that an oath is not required:
representative capacity ( Sec. 4) ; a. When the adverse party was not a
4. $gal existence of an organization (Sec. party to the instrument; OR
4), b. When compliance with an order for an
inspection was refused.
Note: A party desiring to raise an issue as 2. The document heed not be formally
to the legal existence or capacity of any offered in evidence.
party to sue or be sued in a representative
capacity shall do so by SPEC|FtC DENIAL Genuineness means that the instrument is:
which shall include supporting particulars 1. Not spurious, counterfeit, or of different
within the pleader's knowledge. import on its face from the one executed
by the party; or
5. Malice, intent, knowledge, or other 2. That the party whose signature it bears
condition of the mind (Sec. 5); has signed it; and
3, That at the time it was signed, it was in
Ratio: lt is dlfficutt to state the particulars words and figures exactly as set out in the
constituting these matters. pleadings.
6. judgments of domestic or foreign courts, Due Execution means that the document
tribunals, boards, of officers (no need to was:
show jurisdiction (for it is presumed; Sec. 1. Signed voluntarily and knowingly by the
6); and party whose signature appears thereon;
7. Qfficial document or act (Sec. 9). 2. That if signed by somebody else such
representative had the authority to do so;
pacts inat must be Averred particularly: and
The circumstances showing fraud or mistake 3. That it was duly delivered, and that the
in all averments of fraud or mistake (Sec. 5). formalities were complied with. (Hibberd
vs. Rhode, G.R. No. 84"N8. Dec. S, 1915)
SECTION 7. ACTION OR DEFENSE BASED
ON DOCUMENT The following DEFENSES, not being
inconsistent with the genuineness and due
Actionable Document refers to a written execution, are NOT WAIVED despite failure
instrument upon which the action or defense is to specifically deny under oath:
based. (FEW MPM DiSC)
31
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
32
5fir Sell Gollcge of Ldo
2011 CENTRALTZED BAR OPERATTONS
Before judgment by
default is rendered,
defendant may:
1. Move to set
aside order of
default upon
showing of:
FAME and
that he has a
meritorious
defense;
2. Avail ot Rule
65 in proper
cases-
33
REMEDIAT LAW
CIVIT PROCEDURE
Exceptions: A judgment by defautt may be Relief from Order of Default: filotion to Lift
rendered in the following cases despite an Order of Default
answer having been filed:
1. lf a party refuses to obey an order Requisites:
requiring him to compty with the various 1. Verified motion showing fraud, accident
modes of discovery gec. 3[c], Rute 29): or mistake or excusable negligence; and
2. lf a party or officer or managing agent'of a 2. Meritoriousdefenses.
party willfuily fails to appear before the
officer who is to take his deposition (Sec. ln such a case, the order of default may be set
5, Rule 29) (Riano, 2007, p.297). aside on such terms and conditions as the
judge may impose in the interest of justice
Elements of a Valid Declaration of Default: (Rule 9 Secflon 3 (b) Rules of Court).
1. The court must have vatidly ACQUIRED
JURISDICTION over the person of the Rights of a Party in Default:
defendant either by service of summons or Entitled to notice of -
2.
voluntary appearance; 1. Motion to declare him in default;
The defendant FATLS TO ANSWER within 2. Order declaring him in default;
3.
the time allowed therefore; 3. Subsequent proceedings; and
There must be a MOTION to declare the
defendant in default;
4. Service of final orders and judgments.
4. There must be NOTICE to the defendant Note: A defendant declared in default cannot
by
_serving upon him a copy of such take part in the trial, but he cannot be
motion; disqualified from testifying as a witness in
5. There must be pROOF of such failure to favor of non-defaulting defendants (Cavite vs.
answer; and Florendo G.R. No. 73039,gcL 9, 19en.
6. There must be a HEARING to dectare the
defendant in default; . lf the defendant was declared in default
upon an original complaint, the fiting of the
Wherb no Defaults are Ailowed: (ADLeS)
1 Annulment of marriage; complaint.
?. Qeclaration of nuilitybf mairiage;
3. lggalseparation; Hence to
4. Special civil actions of certiorari,
prohibition and mandamus where
comment instead of an answer is required ##**$*#4ftffi {3fr *"._&w
to be fited;
5. .$ummary Procedure.
34
5sn Fels @ollege of {.Eb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Partial Default
1. The pleading asserting a claim states a
common cause of action against several
defending parties;
2. Some of the defending parties answer and SECTION 1. AMENDiIENTS IN GENERAL
the others fail to do so; and
3. The answer interposes a common Pleadings may be amendedby:
defense. 1. Adding an allegation of a party;
2. Adding the name or substitution of a party;
Effect of Partial Default 3. Striking out an allegation of a party;
The court will try the case against ALL 4. Striking out the name of a Party;
defendants upon the answer of some except 5. Correcting a mistake in the name of a
where the defense is personal to the one who party; and
answered, in which case, it will not benefit 6. Correcting a mistake or inadequate
those who did not answer. allegation or description in any other
respect.
The Extent of Relief to be awarded in a
Judgment by Default shall not: Types of Amendments:
1. Exceed the amount prayed for; NOR 1. Amendment as a matter of right - the
2. Be different in kind from that prayed for; party has the unconditional right to amend
NOR his pleading. The court has no right to
3. Award unliquidated damages. prevent him from amending. The'opposite
party has no right to oPPose the
Remedies from judgment by default (flow amendment (lf the court refused to admit
chart) the amended pleading as a matter of right,
it is correctible by mandamus.).
Perfect appeal from said judgment by Such right can only be exercised ONCE.
default within the balance of said Subsequent amendments should be made
15 (30) - day period only by party
S*d$i$ffiffio1"
Annulment of Judgment
under Rule 47
35
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
36
9m Felu Gollege ot 1[,cb
2O1t CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
not be offered in evidence pursuant to counted from notice of the court order
Section 4 of Rule 129. admifting the same.
37
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
36
$sn Ftlr @ollege ot iltb
2O11 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
not be offered in evidence pursuant to counted from notice of the court order
Secfion 4 of Rule 129. admifting the same.
37
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
38
$ln Selc €ollege of Lcb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Note: This Rule is not arranged per section lf it is not in the record, and
but per topic.
SECTION 1. COVERAGE
1. lf filed personally: Proved by the written
or stamped acknowledgment of its filing by
the clerk of court on a copy of the same; or
SECTION 2, FILING AND SERVICE,
DEFINED
2. by registered mail: Proved by the
lf .filed
registry receipt AND the affidavit of the
Notice given to a
party who is duly person who did the mailing with a tull
represented by counsel is a nullity, unless statement of:
service thereof on the party himself was
ordered by the court or the technical defect
a. The date and place of depositing the
was waived.
mail in the post office in a sealed
envelope addressed to the court;
Where party is represented by more than one
b. With postage fully paid; and
counsel of record, service of notice on any of
c. With instructions to the postmaster to
retum the mail to the sender after 10
the latter is sufficient.
days if undelivered.
SECTION 4. PAPERS REQUIRED TO BE
Service is the act of providing a party with a
FILED AND SERVED: (pAMNOJ-DORS)
copy of the pleading or paper concemed.
1. Pleading subsequent to the complaint;
2. Appearance;
3. Written 4qotion; SECTION 5. i'IODES OF SERVICE
4. Sotice;
5. Order; 1 Personal Service (Section 6)
6. judgment; a. Delivering personally a copy to the
7. pemand; party, who is not represented by a
8. Qffer of Judgment; counsel, or to his counsel; or
9. Resolution; or b. Leaving a copy in counsel's office with
10. Similar papers.
a
his clerk or with person having
charge thereof; or
Filing is an act of presenting the pleading or
other paper to the clerk of court"
c. Leaving the copy between 8 a.m. and
6 p.m. at the party's or counsel's
residence, if known, with a person of
SECTION 3. MANNER OF FILING
discretion then
is found
1. Personal service by presenting the
original copies thereof, plainly indicated as
such, to the clerk of court; or
2. Registered mail.
39
REMEDIALLAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
40
$sll ptls @otlege of {.elr
2O11 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
cancellation may be authorized ONLY upon o But where the defendant was declared in
order of court, after proper showing that: default on the original complaint and the
1. The notice is for the purpose of molesting plaintiff subsequently filed an amended
the adverse party; or complaint, new summons must be served
2. lt is not necessary to protect the rights of on the on the amended
defendant
the party who caused it to be recorded. complaint, as the original complaint was
deemed withdrawn upon such
amendment (Atkins vs. Domingo, G.R. No.
L-19565, March 24, 1923).
o Jurisdiction over the person of the General Rule: When an additional defendant
defendant in a civil case is acquired either is joined, summons must be served upon him.
by his VOLUNTARY APPEARANCE or
SERVICE OF SUMMONS upon him Exceptions:
(Minucher vs. CA G.R. IVo.142963, Feb. 1. When the administrator of a deceased
11,2003). party defendant substitutes the deceased;
2. Where upon the death of the original
Summons is the writ by which the defendant defendant his infant heirs are made
is notified of the action brought against him. parties; and
3. ln cases of substitution of the deceased
Purpose of Summons under Sec. 16 of Rule 3.
A. Actions in Personam:
1. To acquire jurisdiction over the person Note: ln these instances, the service of the
of the defendant in a civil case; and ORDER OF SUBSTITUTION is sufficient.
2. To give notice to the defendant that an
action has been commenced against SECTION 1. CLERK TO ISSUE SUMMONS
him (Rtghf to due process).
Summons to be issued:
B. Actions in Rem and Quasi in Rem: 1. Upon the filing of the complaint; and
Not to
acquire jurisdiction over the 2. Payment of the requisite legal fees.
defendant but mainly to satisfy the
constitutional requirement of due process. SECTION 2. CONTENTS
Jurisdiction over the defendant is not
required and the court acquires jurisdiction SECTION 3, BY WHOi'I SERVED
over an action as long as it acquires
jurisdiction over the res (Riano, 2007. P. Summons may be served by:
232). 1. Sheriff;
2. Sheriffls deputy; or
Effect of Non-Service 3. Other proper court officers; or
Unless the defendant voluntarily submits to the
jurisdiction of the court, NON-SERVICE or
4. For justifiable reasons, by any suitable
IRREGULAR SERVICE of summons renders
null and void all subsequent proceedings and
issuances in the action from the order of
default up to and including the judgment by
default and the order of execution. $.hffiffi#w e*ew
The non-service or invalidity of service of
summons may be a ground for dismissal, for
lack of jurisdiction over the person of the
defending party. the
of
Note: Where the defendant has already servrce,
been served with summons on the original
complaint, no further summons is required on
the amended complaint if it does not introduce
new causes of action (Ong Peng vs. Cusfodio, (Sec.6)
G.R. No. 14911, March 25, 1961). summons to
4L
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
42
$ux Fell @otlege of 1[sb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
43
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Exceptions:
1. Motion for judgment on the pleadings;
2. Motion for summary judgment; and
3. Motion for judgment on demurrer to
evidence.
44
5un Fe[e @otlegt of I.sb
2O11 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
45
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
lt
Note: is applicable between the same
parties only when the judgment to be rendered
in the action first instituted will be such that Order granting motion Refile the complaint.
regardless of which parg is successRrt, it wiii to dismiss is a final
amount to res judicata against the second order (without
action (HSBC vs. Aldecoa & Co., G.R. No. L- prejudice).
8437, March 23,1915). Order granting motion
to dismiss (with
r A motion to dismiss may be filed in either Preludice).
suit, not necessarily in the one instituted Order denying the File answer and
first. motion to dismiss is proceed with the trial, if
interlocutory. decision is adverse,
Requisites of Res Judieata appeal therefrom and
1. Previous final judgment or order; raise as error the denial
2. Jurisdiction over the subject matter and of the motion to dismiss.
the parties by the court rendering it; lf there is grave abuse
3. Judgment upon the merits; and of discretion.amounting
to lack or excess of
4. There must be identity of parties, of jurisdiction, Certiorari or
subject matter, and of cause of Prohibition may lie
action between the first and second under Rule 65.
actions.
46
5m Felu €ollege of i[,ab
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Exception: The action cannot be re-filed if it The rule requires a COURT ORDER
was dismissed on any of these grounds: confi rming the dismissal.
(PURE) Such dismissal is WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
1. flrescription; EXGEPT:
2. lnenforceability under the Statute of 1. Where the notice of dismissal so provides;
Frauds or
3. Res judicata; and 2. Where the plaintiff has previously
4. !,xtinguishment of the claim or demand; dismissed the same case in a court of
competent jurisdiction Owo Dismissal
. ln these instances, the remedy of the plaintiff Rule).
is APPEAL.
o lf the plaintiff files a notice of dismissal
SECTION 5. PLEADING GROUNDS AS providing therein a reason that prevents
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES the refilling of the complaint, the dismissal
must be deemed one with prejudice. This
lf no motion to dismiss had been filed, any of happens when the notice provides that the
the grounds for dismissal provided for in Rule plaintiff recognizes the fact of prescription
16, INCLUDING IMPROPER VENUE, may be or extinguishment of the obligation of the
pleaded as affirmative defenses in the answer defendant or for reasons stated in Sec. 5
and a preliminary hearing may be had thereon of Rule 16 (Riano, 2007, p. 225).
in the discretion of the court.
SECTION 2. DISMISSAL UPON MOTION OF
Note: lf the defendant would want to file a PLAINTIFF
counterclaim, he should NOT file a motion to
dismiss. lnstead,.he should allege the,grounds Under this section, the dismissal of the
of a motion to dismiss as affirmative defenses complaint is subject to the DISCRETION of the
in his answer with a counterclaim. A court and upon such terms and conditions as
preliminary hearing may be had thereon, and may be just.
in the event the complaint is dismissed, the
defendant can PROSECUTE his counterclaim. lf a counterclaim has been pleaded by the
defendant PRIOR TO THE SERVICE upon
The ld paragraph ofSecfion 6
clearly him of the plaintiff's motion for dismissal, the
provides that the dismissal of the complaint is dismissal shall be LIMITED TO THE
without prejudice to the prosecution of the COMPLAINT.
counterclaim.
Such dismissal shall be without prejudice to
the right of the defendant to either:
1. Prosecute his counterclaim in a separate
action;OR
SECTION 1. DISMISSAL UPON NOTICE BY 2. To have the same resolved in the same
PLAINTIFF
47
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
SECTION 4. DISMISSAL OF
COUNTERCLAIM, CROSS.GLAIM, OF
Dismissal is at the Dismissal is not
THIRD.PARTY COMPLAINT
instance ofthe procured by plaintiff
plaintiff. though justified by
causes imputable to A dismissal or discontinuance of an action
him. operates to annul orders, rulings or judgments
previously made in the case, as well as all
Dismissal is a matter Dismissal is a matter
of procedure, without of evidence, an
proceedings had in connection therewith and
prejudice unless adjudication on the renders all pleadings ineffective (Servicewide
otherwise stated in the merits. Specia/rs[ lne. vs. CA, G.R. No. 110597, May
order of the court or on 8,1996).
plaintiffs motion to
dismiss his own
complaint"
Dismissal is without Dismissal is without
prejudice to the right of prejudice to the right of Prc-Trial is a mandatory ennference and
the defendant to the defendant to personal confrontation before the judge
prosecute his prosecute his
counterclaim in a
between the parties and their respective
counterclaim on the
separate action unless same or separate
counsel.
Min 15 days from action.
notice of the motion he SECTION 1. WHEN CONDUCTED
manifests his intention
to have his After the last pleading has been served and
counterclaim resoived filed, it shall be the duty of the plaintiff to
in the same action. promptly move ex-parte that the case be set
for pre-trial.
SECTION 3. DISMISSAL DUE TO FAULT OF
PLAINTIFF . Specifically, the motion is to be filed within
5 days after the last pleading joining the
Causes for Dismissal issue has been served and filed
1. Plaintiff fails to appear for no justifiabte (Administrative Circular No. 3-99 January
cause on the date of the presentation of 15, 1999). lf the plaintiff fails to file said
his evidence in chief on the complaint; motion within the given period, the branch
2. Plaintiff fails to prosecute his action for an clerk of court shall issue a NOTICE OF
unreasonable length of time (NoIIe . PRE- TRIAL (A.M. No. 03-109-SC, July
Prasequi);and 1s,2004).
3. Plaintiff fails to comply with these Rutes or
any order of the court. Note: The "LAST PLEADING' need not be
literally construed as the qctual filing of the last
. The plaintiffs failure to appear at the trial pleading. For purposes of the pre-trial, the
. after he has presented his evidence and expiration of the period for filing the last
rested his case DOES NOT WARRANT pleading is sufficient (Sarmiento vs. Juan,
the dismissal of the case on the ground of
failure to prosecute. lt is merely a waiver
of his right to cross-examine and to object
to the admissibility of evidence (Jatover vs.
Ytoriaga, G.R. No. L-359A9, Oct. 28,
1977).
48
9m ffie[u Gollege of Lsb
2OT 1 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
49
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIT PROCEDURE
I Agreerens I
(Asuncion vs. Pinedq G.R. No.L-47924,
I made by I
I parties; I
July 31, 1989).
I Amendments to I
i
direct
and
lf evidence is r legal
insufiicient to prove
plaintitrs cause of
in the
which
action or defendant's
counterclaim, lhe
pla
court rules in favoi of
either one or 1989):
dismisses the case.
50
5sn Felu @ollege of Lab
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
sEcTtoN 3. PLEADINGS.IN-
INTERVENTION
an
1. Complaint-in-intervention - lf the
by
his
intervenor asserts a claim against either or
all of the original parties.
2. Answer-in-intervention - lf the intervenor
unites with the defendant in resisting a
claim against the latter. with
51
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
52
9er Fels Gollrgc of Lsb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
53
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
SEGTION 3. EXAIIIIINATION AND CROSS. Ratio: Because it is merely an error of law not
EXAilINATION grave abuse of discretion.
54
Sm Fela Gollege of llb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
55
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
SEGTION 25. DEPOSITION UPON WRITTEN . Depositions under this Rule do not prove
INTERROGATORTES; SERVTCE OF NOTTCE the existence of any right and the
AND OF INTERROGATORIES testimony perpetuated is not in itself
conclusive proo{ either of the existence of
SECTION 26. OFFICERS TO TAKE AND any right or even of the facts to whicfr they
PREPARE RECORD relate, as it can be controverted at the tial
55
$en Fell Golhgp sJTffi
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
57
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
necessary for succeeding sets of 3. Under this rule, a matter of fact not related
intenogatories. to any documents may be presented to the
other party for admission or denial.
SECTION 5. SCOPE AND USE OF
INTERROGATORIES
58
9m Fell €othge of Lelr
t
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
must be only those within lhe possession, insane person, while the physical condition
control, or custody of a party. of the party is generally involved in
PHYSICAL INJURIES cases.
r Since the results of the examination are
intended to be made public, the same are
not covered by the physician-patient
privilege (Sec. 24b, Rule 130).
A means of compelling
production of evidence SECTION 2. ORDER FOR EXAMINATION
The Rules is limited to It may be directed to a
the parties to the person whether a party Requisites to Obtain an Order for
action. or not. Examination:
The order under this It may be issued upon 1. A MOTION must be filed for the physical
Rule is issued only an ex parte application. and mental examination;
upon motion with
notice to the adverse
2. The motion must show GOOD CAUSE for
the examination;
3. NOTICE to the party to be examined and
to all other parties; and
SECTION 1. MOTION FOR PRODUCTION 4. The motion shall SPECIFY the time, place,
OR INSPECTION; ORDER manner, conditions, and scope of the
examination and the person or persons by
Production of documents affords more whom it is made.
opportunity for discovery than a subpoena
duces tecum. However, the rule is not SEGTION 3. REPORT OF FINDINGS
intended for use as a dragnet or any fishing
expedition. lf requested by the party examined, the party
causing the examination to be made shall
The DOCUMENTS to be produced: deliver to him a copy of a detailed written
1. Should not be priviteged; and report of the examining physician.
2. Should constitute or contain evidence
material to any matter involved in the After such request and delivery, the party
action, and which are in his (the party causing the examination to be made shall be
ordered) possession, custody, or control. entitled upon request to receive from the party
examined a like report of any examination,
r ln a petition for the production of papers previously or thereafter made, of the same
and documents, they must be sufficienfly mental or physical condition.
described and identified. Othenrvise, the
petition €nnot prosper. sEcTroN 4. wAtvER or pnluleer
o This mode of discovery does not authorize
the opposing party or the clerk or other Where the party examined requests and
funclionaries of the court to distrain the obtains a e results of the
articles or deprive the person who
produced the same of their possession, He
even temporarily (Tanda vs. Atdaya, L- the
13423, Nov.23, 1959). and
tn
same
of any
SECTION 1. WHEN EXAMINATION MAY BE him or
ORDERED
59
f,
REMEDIAT LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
7.
60
REMEDIAL tAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
lLi
5en Felu Gollege of Lab
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Qral arguments
. Submission of
memoranda
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
62
$un Fete @stlege of i[eb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
2. Filed with different branches of the same . Reference to a commissioner may be had
RTC and one of such cases has NOT by the written consent of both parties.
been partially tried.
General Rule: Trial by commissioner depends
Purpose: To avoid multiplicity of suits, guard largely upon the discretion of the court; BUT
against oppression or abuse, prevent delay, the following are instances when such
clear congested dockets, simplify the work of appointment is mandatory:
the trial court and save unfiecessary costs and 1. Expropriation (Rule 67);
expenses. 2. Partition (Rule 69);
3. Settlement of Estate of a Deceased
Requisites for Consolidation: Person in case of contested claims; and
1. Actions which involve a common question 4. Submission of accounting by executors or
of law or fact; and administrators.
2. There must be at least 2 actions pending
before the same court. Note: An irregularity in the appointment of a
. lf filed with DIFFERENT courts, an commissioner must be seasonably raised in
authorization from the SUPREME COURT the trial court where the defect could still be
is necessary. remedied. lt can be WAIVED by consent of
the parties, express or implied.
Three (3) Ways of Gonsolidating Cases
1. By recasting the cases atready instituted - SECTION 2. REFERENCE ORDERED ON
Reshaping of the cases by amending the MOTION
pleading and dismissing some caseJ and
. retaining only one case. There must be Situations when reference to a Commissioner
joinder of causes of action and of parties; may be made ON MOTION: IETC-AI
2. By consolidation proper or by 1. lxamination of a long account;
consolidating the existing cases - lt is a 2. Taking of an account is necessary;
joint trial with joint decision, the cases 3. Garrying a judgment or order into effect; or
retaining their original docket numbers; 4. Question of fact, other than upon the
and pleading arises.
3. By fesl-case method - by hearing only the
principal case and suspending the hearing SECTION ORDER3. bT
REFERENGE"
on the other cases until judgment has POWERS OF THE COMMISSIONER
been rendered iri the principal case. The
cases retain their originat docket numbers. Requisites of the Order of Reference:
1. lt must state the purpose;
Consolidation of c€lses on appeal and 2. lt must be in writing; and
assigned to different divisions of ine SC anO 3. lt may'specify or limit the power of the
the CA is also authorized. commissioner.
63
BEMEDIAT TATTY
CIVIL PROCEDURE
64
5sn Frle €olhge of {lb
2O11 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
6s
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIT PROCEDURE
M
( ff^u. EncSncair
for the presentation of eviOence -
. as
distinguished from an issue which l.
,fl"r, W made
fi ctitious,. contrived, a n d patenily, "
n.u U.i.nli"f ffir action
so as not to constitute a genuine issue for for
tru
trial.
ffi_
,&
66
5m Fclc 6o[eqe of Irb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Sanctions:
1. Pay to the other party the amount of the
reasonable expenses including attomey,s
fees; and
2. After hearing, adjudged offending party
guilty of contempt.
the facts
67
REMEDIAT tAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
,n"ill.
tnffiv
noW, ffi :":ffi
F,,q
made
fic{itious,. contrived, and patenty
so as not to constitute a genuine issue
for
"
;fi;"ianli;i
triii
speffi;1
for dtmffi
ffiffi
;ru ffi--{"{j
action
66
ffi
W
$en Felu 6o[ege of llf
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Sanctions:
1. Pay to the other party the amount of the
reasonable expenses including attomey,s
fees; and
2. After hearing, adjudged offending party
guilty of contempt.
the facts
67
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVILPROCEDURE
68
Sm Fell Gollege sf {.sb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
some
lf no appeal S-year
is taken or lf granted, lf denied, losing 6, Rule
did not avail the court: party may appeal
of remedies, 1. Modifies within a fresh 1S
judgment decision; or day period. Remedial
becomes 2. Grants (Neypes vs. Court
final and new trial af Appeals.)
executory.
69
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIT PROCEDURE
68
Sm Fe[a €olbge of {.nb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
(J. Conditional Judgment is one wherein the r The power to dmend a judgment is
effectivity of which depends upon the inherent to the court before judgment
occurrence or non-occurrence of an event. becomes final and executory.
As a general rule, judgments of such kind,
conditioned upon a contingency, are held General Rule: After judgment has become
to be NULL and VOID. (Cu tJnjieng y Hgos final and executory, the court cannot amend
vs. Mabalacat Sugar Co., 70 phit. 390) the same.
some
lf no appeal S-year
is taken or lf granted, lf denied, losing
did not avail the court: parly may appeal 6, Rule
of remedies, 1. Modifies within a fresh 15 3e)
judgment decision; or day period. relief
becomes 2. Grants (Neypes vs. Court
final and new trial of Appeals.)
executory.
59
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
70
5an Fels Gollege of Lffi
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
When to file: Within the period for taking an Extrinsic Fraud connotes any faudulent
appeal. scheme executed by the prevailing party
oulside of the trial against the losing party who
Where to file: With the trial court which because of such fraud is prevented .from
rendered the judgment or final order sought to presenting his side of the case (ex. prevent
be reconsidered. wrfness tro m te dify in g).
77
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Rule-' Negligence of counsel is binding on the
SECTION 2. CONTENTS OF MOTION FOR
client.
NEW TRIAL OR RECONSIDERATION AND
NOTICE THEREOF
Exception:,Such negligence of counsel may
be a ground for new trial if it was so great that
A motion for new trial, based on FAME must
the party was prejudiced and preueiteJ lro* include an affidavit of merit, which states:
rarny presenting his case.
1. The nature or character of FAME;
Requisites of Newly-Discovered Evidence
2. The facts constituting the movant,s good
(Berry Rute) and substantial defense or valid cause of
action;and
1. lt must have been discovered after the 3. The evidence which he intends to present
trial;
if his motion is granted.
2. lt could not have been discovered and
produced at the trial even with the
exercise of reasonable diligence; and
. A motion for new trial, based on newly
3. The evidence is of discovered evidence, must contain
,"(ni in"t if affidavits of witnesses or duly
"rcn'
admitted, would probably alter ilie resutt of
the action; and authenticated documents.
4. lt must be material and not . A motion for reconsideration must
merely point out the findings or conclusions
collateral, cumulative or corroborative.
not supported by the evidence or
These standards, also known as the ,,Bern,, contrary to law.
rule, trace their origin to the f ASf ca;-if
Berry vs. State of Georgia. N-ote: A motion suspends or tolls the running
of the reglementary period for appeal except
o Newly discovered evidence need not be
when the same is pro-forma.
newly created evidence. lt may anO Ooes
commonly refer to evidence already in An AFFIDAVTT OF |UER|TS is one which
existence prior or during triat Out wiricir recites the nature and character of FAME on
could not have been secured which the motion is based and stating the
presented during the trial despite movant's good and substantial cause of action
"nO or defense and the evidence he intends to
reasonabLe diligenceon the part of 'the if
(Tumans vs. Court of epi"iii,
present the motion is
granted, which
[ig^anj - evidence should be such ls to warrant
G.R. Nos.82 346-47, Aprit 1 7, 1 gilgi.
reasonable belief that the result of the case
wotd probably be otherwise (paz vs. lnandan,
75 Phil. 608; Manita Surety vs. Det Rosario,
Evjdence was noi- 101 Phil.412).
Evidence was atieaOy
available to a party available to a party and
during the trial, and was not able to present Without an affidavit of merits, the motion for
was discovered onlv it through inadvertence new trial is a mere pro-forma motion
thereafter. or negligence of
counsel; not a ground
for new trial.
2.A a ground
motion
72
Sm Frll 6ollrgr of Lnh
2O11 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
lndications ol a Pro-Forma Motion issues, shall be used at the new trial taking the
1. lt is based on the same ground as that same.
raised in a denied motion under Ru/e 3Z;
2. lt contains the same arguments in the
opposition to a granted motion to dismiss
3. The new ground alleged in the second
motion for new trial already existed, was Specifically mentioned Not mentioned in the
available and could have been alleged in in the Rules. Rules but is
the first motion for new trial which was nevertheless a
denied; recognized
4. lt is based on the ground of insufficiency of procedural recourse
evidence or that the judgment is contrary deriving validity and
to law but does not specify the supposed acceptance from long
defects in the judgment; established usage.
5. lt is based on FAME but does not specify Note: lt is actually
mentioned in the
the facts constituting these grounds andior
Rules of Criminal
is not accompanied by an affidavit of merit; Procedure (Ra/e
and 119,5ec. 24) and as
6. Non-compliance with the requirements of a prohibited pleading
Rule 15. in the 1991 Revised
Rules on Summary
Note: A motion for reconsideration, if based Procedure (Sec.
on the same grounds as that of a new trial, is 19c).
considered a motion for new trial and has the Proper only after May properly be
same effect (Rodriguez v. Rovira, G.R. No. promulgation of presented only after
45252, 5ept.24,1936). judgment. either or both the
parties have formally
SECTION 3. ACTION UPON MOTION FOR offered and closed
their evidence before
NEW TRIAL OR REGONSIDERATION
judgment.
73
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Grounds:
1. When judgment or final order is entered A party who has filed a timely motion for new
into or any other proceeding is thereafter trial and/or reconsideration cannot file a
taken against the petitioner through petition for relief after his motion has been
FAME. denied. These remedies'are exclusive of each
other. lt is only in appropriate cases where a
party aggrieved by the judgment has not been
The phrase "other proceeding', includes an
order or writ of execution, or an order able to file amotion for new trial and/or
dismissing an appeat (Medran v. CA, g3 reconsideration that a petition for relief can be
Phit 164) filed (Francisco vs. Puno, G.R.No. L-55694,
October 23, 1981).
2. When petitioner has been prevented from
taking an appeatby FAME. SECTION 3. TIME FOR FILING PETITION;
CONTENTS AND VERIFICATION
Note: A petition for relief has been held to be
applicable to all kinds of speciat proceedings,
such as land registration, intestate setfleme-nt
and guardians[ip proceedings (Regatado,
RemedialLaw Compendium, Vot. t, dh-fa., p. A:
432).
74
$er Bela CoIIege ot Lsb
201 1 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
75
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
SEGTlOirl 1. EXECUTTON UPON Take note that for the supervening event to
JUDGMENTS AND FINAL ORDERS. apply, the supervening event must happen
after the judgment has become final and
Execution as a Matter of Right executory.
1. On motion;
2. Upon a judgment or order that disposes of lnstances where execution is a matter of
the action or proceeding; right:
3. Upon expiration of the period to appeal 1. Secfircn 1, paragraph I - no appeal;
therefrom and NO appeal has been duly judgment becomes final;
perfected. 2. Section 1, paragraph 2 - there is an
appeal; once the CA judgment becomes
Execution of Judgment final;
3. Section 4 - Judgment in an action for
Execution is a Discretionary injunction, receivership, accounting,
matter of right after
expiration of period
execution upon support, judgment declared be to
good reasons stated immediately executory; and
to appeal and no
appeal is perfected.
in a special order 4. Rule 70 - Judgments in Forcible Entry and
afterdue hearing. Unlawful Detainer cases.
of the
General Rule: lt is a matter of right on the part
of the winning party. The court cannot refuse
execution.
76
9il Fets @otbge ot Lsb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
decidendi (Mutual Security Ins. Corp. vs. "The requirement of good reason is important
CA, GR /Vo. L-47018, September 11, and must not be overlooked, because if the
1987); and judgment is executed and, on appeal, the
2. Where extensive and explicit discussion same is reversed, although there are
and settlement of the issue is found in the provisions for restitution, qftentimes damages
body of the decision (Witson Ong Ching may arise which cannot be fully compensated.
Kian Clzung, et al vs. Chinese National Accordingly, execution should be granted only
Cereals Oil and Foodstuffs lmport and when these considerations are clearly
Export Corp., et at., GR No 131502, June outweighed by superior circumstances
8,20Aq. demanding urgency, and the above provision
requires a statement of those circumstances
Note: When the writ of execution varies the as a securig for their existence." (City of
terms of the dispositive portion, the defeated Bacolod vs. Enriquez, 101 Phil. 644)
party CAN FILE:
1. Motion to quash the writ of execution, if Examples of good reasons:
denied; and 1. When there is danger of the judgment
2. File petition for certiorari under Ru/e 65 becoming INEFFECTU AL. (Scottish Union
with prayer for TRO (Atbano, Remediat vs. Macadaeg, 91 Phil. 891);
Law Reviewer). 2. OLDAGE;
3. Where the appeal is for the purpose of
SECTION 2. DISCRETIONARY EXECUTION DELAY;
4. When the successful party files a'BOND
(but is not by itself alone, a good reason);
Grounds:
1. lnsolvency of the judgment debtor; and
2. Wastage of asset by judgment debtor.
The court may, in its discretion, order an
execution before the expiration of the time
within which to appeat, pROVtDED:
1. There is a motion for execution filed by the
winning party;
2. There is notice of said motion to the
adverse party; and
3. There are good reasons stated in a special is NOT
order after due hearing.
77
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
SEGTION 1. EXECUTION UPON Take note that for the supervening event to
JUDGMENTS AND FINAL ORDERS. apply, the supervening event must happen
after the judgment has become final and
Execution as a Matter of Right executory.
1. On motion;
2. Upon a judgment or order that disposes of lnstances where execution is a matter of
the action or proceeding; right:
3. Upon expiration of the period to appeal 1. Secfion f, paragraph I - no appeal;
therefrom and NO appeal has been duly judgment becomes final;
perfected. 2. Section 1, paragraph 2 - there is an
appeal; once the CA judgment becomes
Execution of Judgment final;
3. Section 4 - Judgment in an action for
Execution is a Discretionary injunction, receivership, accounting,
matter of right after execution upon support, judgrnent declared to be
expiration of period good reasons stated immediately executory; and
to appeal and no
appeal is perfected.
in a special order 4. Rule 70 - Judgments in Forcible Entry and
after due hearing. Unlawful Detainer cases.
76
9m Bela @olbgr ot Leb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
decidendi (Mutual Security lns. Corp. vs. 'The requirement of good reason is important
CA, GR No. L-47018, September 11, and must not be overlooked, because if the
1987); and judgment is executed and, on appeal, the
2. Where extensive and explicit discussion same is reversed, although there are
and settlement of the issue is found in the provisions for restitution, ofientimes damages
body of the decision (Wilson Ong Ching may arise which cannot be fully compensated.
Kian Chung, ef al ys. Chinese Nationat Accordingly, execution should be granted only
Cereals Oil and Foodstuffs lmport and when these considerations are clearly
Export Corp., et at., GR No 131502, June outweighed by superior circumstances
8,2000). demanding urgency, and the above provision
requires a statement of those circumstances
Note: When the writ of execution varies the as a security for their existence." (City of
terms of the dispositive portion, the defeated Bacolod vs. Enriquez, 101 Phil. 644)
party CAN FILE:
1. Motion to quash the writ of execution, if Examples of good reasons:
denied; and 1. When there is danger of the judgment
2. File petition for ceftiorai under Ru/e 65 becoming INEFFECTU AL. (Scattish Union
with prayer for TRO (Albano, Remedial vs. Macadaeg,91 Phil. 891);
Law Reviewer). 2. OLDAGE;
3. Where the appeal is for the purpose of
SECTION 2. DISCRETIONARY EXECUTION DELAY;
4. When the successful party files a BOND
(but is not by itself alone, a good reason);
Grounds:
1. lnsolvency of the judgment debtor; and
2. Wastage of asset by judgment debtor.
The court may, in its discretion, order an
execution before the expiration of the time
within which to appeat, pROV|DED:
1. There is a motion for execution filed by the
winning party;
2. There is notice of said motion to the
adverse party; and
3. There are good reasons stated in a special is NOT
order after due hearing.
77
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Modes of Enforcement
1. By motion within S years from date of its
entry;
2. By independent action for revival of
judgment after five (5) years from entry
AND before it is barred by statute of
limitations which is ten (10i years from
entry under Arf. 1144 (3) of Civit Code
(This action is a person al one and not
quasiin rem.).
78
$sn Eels Oolleqe of fub
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
B. ln case of death of JUDGMENT . The sheriff can validJy levy any property of
OBLIGOR the judgment obligor which may be
1. BEFORE LEW: disposed of for value but not exempt from
o Execution will issue if the action is execution. The judgment obligor has the
for the recovery of real or personal option to choose which property to levy
property or any lien thereon. upon.
. Execution will NOT issue if the r lf he does not exercise the option, the
action is for the recovery of a sum officer shall FIRST levy on the personal
of money. ln this situation, the properties, if any, and then on the real
judgment obligee should file a properties if the personal properties are
claim against the estate of the insufficient to answer for the judgment
judgment obligor under Rule 86. ' (Sec 9[b]).
o Real or personal property or any interest in
2. AFTER LEVY either may be levied upon in like manner
o Execution will issue in any case. and with like effect as under a writ of
attachment.
Ratio: After a
valid levy, the property is . Real Propefi: by filing with the Register of
already separated from the estate of the Deeds a copy of the order together with
deceased and is deemed tN CUSTODIA the description of the property and a notice
LEGlS. that it is attached (Secfion 7(a) Rule 57).
. Personal Property: lf capable of. manual
SECTION 8.
ISSUANCE, FORM AND delivery, by taking and safely keeping it in'
CONTENTS OFA WRIT OF EXECUTION the custody of the sheriff after isuuing the
conesponding receipt therefor (Secfibn
Note: Appeal is the remedy for an order 7(b) Rule 57).
DENYING the issuance of a writ of execution,
Garnishment
However, an order GRANTING the issuance It is an act of appropriation by the court when
of a writ of execution of a final judgment is not the property of debtor is in the hands of a third
appealable under Ru/e 41; lhe remedy is to file person.
an appropriate special civil action under Rule
65. . A specie of attachment for reaching any
property or credits pertaining or payable to
SECTION 9- EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS a judgment debtor.
FOR MONEY, HOW ENFORCED . The sheriff may levy on debts due the
judgrnent obligor and other credits,
lf Award is for Payment of Money: including bank deposits, financial interests,
1. lmmediate payment on demand; royalties, commissions and other personal
2. Satisfaction by levy; property not capable of manual delivery in
3. Garnishment of debts and credits. the possession or control of third parties
(Sec.
The judgment obligor shail pay in cash, or
bertified bank ;heck payable to the judgment
obligee or any other form of payment
acceptable to the obligee (Sec 9[a/).
Levy
It is an act by which an officer sets apart or
appropriates a part of the whole property of
the judgment debtor for purposes of the
execution sale.
79
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
SECTION 10. EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS judgments for specific act, a certified copy of
FOR SPECIFIC ACT the judgment shall be attached to the writ.
1. Conveyance, delivery of deeds, or other The writ of execution shall be served upon the
specific acts, vesting tiile; party required to obey the same and such
2. Sale of real or personal property; party may be punished for CONTEMPT if he
3. Delivery or restitution of real property; disobeys.
4. Removal of improvements on property
subject of execution; Note: A specialjudgment may be enforced by
5. Delivery of personal property. contempt if the defendant refuses to comply
with the judgment. But if it is an ordinary
A. lf the party REFUSES TO VACATE THE judgment and the defendant refuses to
PROPERTY: comply, it is not a ground for contempt.
The remedy is NOT CONTEMpT. The
Sheriff must oust the party. But if SECTION 12. EFFECT OF LEVY ON
demolition is involved, there must be a EXECUTION AS TO THIRD PERSONS
specialorder.
The levy on execution creates a lien in favor of
B. lf the party REFUSES TO DELTVER: the judgment obligee over the right, title and
A writ of execution direciing the sheriff to interest of the judgment obligor such in
cause the defendant to vacate is in the property at the time of the levy, subjec-t to liens
nature of a habere facias possessionern and encumbrances then existing.
and authorizes the sheriff to break open
the premises where there is no occupant SECTION {3. PROPERTY EXEMPT FROM
therein (Arcadio v. ytagan, A.C. No. 2754, EXECUTION
July 30, 1986).
EXCEPT as othenrise expressly provided by
C. When the party REFUSES TO COMpLy: law, the following property, and no other, shall
.The court can appoint some other person be exempt from execution:
at the expense of the disobedieni party 1. The judgment obligor's famity home as
and the act done shall have the same provided by law, or the homestead in
effect as if the required party performed it. which he resides, and land necessarily
used in connection therewith;
General Rute: The judgment debtor CANNOT 2. Ordinary tools and implements personally
be
.cited in contempt of court. Generally, used by him in his trade, employment, or
contempt is not a remedy to enforce a livelihood;
judgment.
3. Three horses, or three cows, or three
carabaos, or other beasts of burden, such
Exceptions: as the judgment obligor may select
1. Refusal to perform a particular act or necessarily used by him in his ordinary
Special Judgments under Sec. 11 where occupation;
^
2.
he may be cited in contempt;and
ln case of the provisio-nal remedy of 4. His necessary clothing and articles for
support,pendente lite under Ru/e 6t; the
judgment debtor may stilt be cited for
contempt even if the decision is not a
specialjudgment and requires the latter to
pay money.
80
5sr Seta Gollegr of {.sb
2O11 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
C. lf real property:
By posting for 20 days in three (3) pubtic
places particularly describing the property
and stating where the property is to be
sold, and if the assessed value of the
property exceeds P50,000, by publishing a
copy of the notice once a week for two (2)
consecutive weeks in one (1) newspaper
81
REMEDIAL tAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
SECTION 18. NO SALE IF JUDGMENT AND The officer may AGAIN SELL the property to
COSTS PAID the highest bidder and shall not be responsible
for any loss occasioned thereby.
At any time before the sale of property on
execution, the judgment obligor may prevent But the court may order the refusing purchaser
the sale BY PAYING the amount required by to pay to the court the amount of such loss,
the execution and the costs that have been with costs, and may punish him for contempt if
incurred therein. he disobeys the order.
be confirmed by
the court in order to
Need not be confirmed divest the rights in the
by the court property of the parties
and to vest the rights in
There is no riqht of
redemption, exceptby
Right of redemption the mortgagor where
exists the mortgagee is a
bank or a banking
institution
82
9en Fele Gollege of Ldo
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
SECTION 25. CONVEYANCE OF REAL the judgment debtor of any further rights to the
PROPERTY; CERTIFICATE THEREOF property.
GIVEN TO PURCHASER AND FILED WTH
REGISTRY OF DEEDS Right of Redemption:
1. Personal Property NONE; Sale is
CONTENTS of the certificate of sale: ABSOLUTE.
1. A particular description of the real property 2. Real Property -' There is a right of
sold; redemption.
2. The price paid for each distinct tot or
parcel; Who may redeem (Sec.27):
3. The whole price paid by him; and 1. Judgment obligor, or his successor rn
4. A statement that the right of redemption interest, in the whole or any part of the
expires one (1) year from the date of the property;OR
registration of the certificate of sale. 2. Redemptioner who is a creditor having a
lien by virtue of an ATTACHMENT
Note: Confirmation of the sale is not needed JUDGMENT oT MORTGAGE on the
unlike in judicial foreclosure of mortgage. The property sold, SUBSEQUENT to the lien
certificate of
sale is
merely provisional under which the pi'operty was sold.
(Raymundo v. Sunico, G.R. No. 8241, Sept.
27, 1913). Note: lf his lien is PRIOR to the judgment, he
is not a redemptioner because his interests in
May the validity of an auction sale be his lien are fully protected (relate to'Section
attacked? 12).
General Rule: NO
because of
the When can redemption be made (Sec.28):
presumption of regular performance of duty by A. BY THE JUDGMENT OBLIGOR:
the sheriff. Within one (1) year from the date of
registration of the certificate of sale.
Exception: B. BY THE REDEMPTIONER:
1. When from the nature of the irregularity or Within one (1) year from the date of
from intrinsic facts, injury resulted registration of the certificate of sale if he is
therefrom (Navano vs. Navarro, 76 phil. the first redemptioner; or
122).
Within sixty (60) days from the last
2. When the price obtained is shockingly redemption, if he be a subsequent
inadequate and it is shown that a better redemptioner, provided that the judgment
price can be obtained at a resale (Barrozo debtor has not exercised his right of
vs. Macadaeg, 83 Phit. 378). redemption.
Exception to the Exception: The rule that BUT, in all cases the judgment obligor shall
you can question the validity of the auction have the entire (1) year from the
gle if the price obtained is shockingly date of to redeem
inadequate does not apply when the property
sold is realproperty.
*
SECTION 26. CERTIFICATE OF SALE ffiffi &*eaW{
WHERE PROPERW CLAIMED BY THIRD
PERSON
.
83
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
84
5sn Prtu Gollege of {lh
201 1 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
85
REMEDIAL !.AW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
86
5en Fele @ollege of Lslr
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Under the doctrine of res judicafa, no matter SECTION 48. EFFECT OF FOREIGN
how erroneous a judgment may be, once it JUDGMENT OR FINAL ORDERS
becomes final, it cannot be corrected.
Public Policy Principle: A judgment by a
Gonclusiveness of judgment court is enforceable only within its territorial
The issues actually and directly resolved in a jurisdiction.
former suit cannot again be raised in any
future case between the same parties Effect of Foreign Judgments
involving a different cause of action. Provided that the foreign tribunal had
jurisdiction:
r lt has the effect of preclusion only of 1. ln case of judgment against a specific
issues. thing, the judgment is conclusive upon the
. The parties in both actions may be the title to the thing; or
same but the causes of action are 2. ln case of a judgment against a person,
different. the judgmenlis presurnptive evidence of a
right as between the parties and their
successors-in-interest by a subsequent
title.
There is identity of There is ONLY
parties, subject matter identity of PARTIES There are two ways of giving effect to a foreign
and causes of action. AND SUBJECT judgment (a) an ordinary action to enforce the
MATTER. foreign judgment may be filed in court or (b) it
The first judgment The first judgment is may be pleaded in an answer or a motion to
constitutes as an ' conclusive only as to dismiss (Herrera, Remedial Law, Vol. ll, 2007
ABSOLUTE BAR TO matters directly Ed., p. 5*31).
ALL MAfiERS direcfly adjudged and actually
adjudged and those litigated in the first Note: ln BOTH instances, the judgment may
that might have been action. Second action be repelled by evidence Of (JN CFC)
adjudged. can be prosecuted. a. Want of iurisdiction;
It has the effect of It has the effect of b. Want of notice;
preclusion of claims. preclusion only of c. Qollusion;
issues. d. Fraud; or
e. Qlear mistake of law or fact.
Doctrine of law of the case - according to
this principle, whatever is once irrevocably
established as the controlling legal rule or
decision between the same parties in the case
continues to be the law of the case whether Three Modes of Appeal:
correct on general principles or not, so long as 1. Ordinary Appeal (Rule 40 and 41)
the facts on which such decision \ /as a. Notice on appeal
predicated continue to be the facts of the case
before the court. (RCPI vs. Coutt of Appeats,
G.R. /Vo. 139763, Aprit26, 2006)
judgment
to the
87
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Note: Only FlNALjudgments or orders can be motion for reconsideration (Neypes vs. CA,
appealed as distinguished from interlocutory G.R. No. 141524, September 14, 2005).
judgments ororderswhich are not appealable.
Ratio and Basis:
. Pursuant to its sole prerogative to amend
procedural rules, the SC deems it
necessary to change the afore-stated rule
in order to standardize the appeal periods
Ordinary Appeal is an appeal by notice of provided in the Rules of Court, to be
appeal from a judgment or final order of a counted from receipt of the order denying
lower court on questions of fact and law. the motion for new trial dr motion for
reconsideration (whether full or partial or
r The right to appeal is not a natural right or any final order or resolution) and to afford
a part of due process. lt is merely a litigants fair opportunity to appeal their
statutory privilege and may be exercised cases.
only in the manner and in accordance with
the provisions of the law (producers Bank The fresh period shall apply to:
of the Philippines ys. CA, GR No 126620, 1. Rule 40
Aprill7,2002). 2. Rule 41
3. Rule 42
Note: A question that was never raised in 4. Rule 43
the court below cannot be allowed to be raised 5. Rule 45
for the first time on appeal, without offending
basic rules of fair play, justice and due process Note: No motion for extension of time to file a
(Villanueva ys. Sps Satvador, G.R No. motion for new trial or reconsideration shall be
*
139436, January 25,2006). allowed. But if the appeal requires the filing of
a record on appeal, a motion for extension to
SECTION 1. WHERE TO APPEAL submit record on appeal is allowed.
88
9en Fels Gollege ot lxnn
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
MaterialData Rule
The notice of appeal must also be
Notice to parties that an appeal is being
accompanied by a statement of thematerial
taken from the decision of MTC
dates showing the timeliness of the appeal.
89
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIT PROCEDURE
SECTION 8.
APPEAL FROM ORDERS Gases wherc multiple appeals ane
DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT TRIAL; LACK allowed:
OF JURISDICTION L Specialproceedings;
2. Actions for recovery of property with
A, lf the lower court dismissed the case accounting;
without trial on the merits, RTC MAy: 3. Actions for partition of property with
1. Affirm, if ground of dismissal is lack of accounting;
jurisdiciion over the subject matter, the 4. Special civil actions of eminent
RTC, if it has jurisdiction, shafi TRy domain (expropriation) ;
the case on the merits as if the case 5. Special civil actions for foreclosure of
was originally filed therein; mortgage. (Roman Catholic
2. Reverce,in which case, it shall of Manita v. CA, 2Sg
Archbishop
remand the case for further scRA 186)
proceedings.
SECTION 1. SUBJECT OF APPEAL
B. lf the case was tried on the merits by
the lower court without jurisdiction Appealable Cases:
over the subject matter:
. RTC shall not dismiss the case 1. Judgments or final orders that completely
if it disposes of the case;
has original jurisdiction, but shall 2. A particular matter in a judgment declared
DECIDE the case, and shail ADMTT by the Rules to be appealable.
amended pleadings or additional
evidence. Non-Appealable Gases (PtDSES-D)
1. An order denying a getition for relief or any
SECTION 9. APPLICABILITY OF RULE 4{ similar motion seeking relief from
judgment;
By virtue of this provision, the inferior courts 2. An lnterlocutory order;
also exercise residual jur.isdiction in the same 3. An order glisallowing or dismissing an
manner provided under par. 5 Sec. g of Rute appeal;
41. 4. An order denying a motion to get aside a
judgment by consent, con6ssion or
compromise on the ground of faud,
mistake or duress, or any other ground
vitiating consent;
Note: As amended by A.M. No. 07_7_12 SC, 5. An order of gxecution;
effective December 27 ,2OOT o. A judgment or final order for or against
one or more of several parties or in
Three modes of appeal from decisions of geparate claims, counterclaims, cross-
the RTC claims and third parg complaints, while
1. Or(inary appeal or appeal by writ of error, the main case is pending, unless the court
where judgment was rendered in a civil or allows an appealtherefrom; and
criminal action by the RTC in the exercise An order glismissing an action without
of original jurisdiction;
2. Petition for review, where judgment was
rendered by the RTC in the exercise of
appellate jurisdiction; and
3. Petition for review on ceftiorari to the ##*q-ffi4xffi mp.f.Akru-
Supreme Court.
90
SEn 8r!l Gollege of Ltr
2O11 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
TAKE NOTE:
The term 'finalt has two (2) possible meanings
in Civil Procedure:
1. Flnal in the sense that is already it
executory and that happens if there is no File a notie of File a verified File a verified
appeal. And that is for purposes of appeal or a petition for petition for
applying rule 39 on execution. record on review with review on
2. Final in the sense that it is not merely appeal with the CA. Pay certiorari with
interlocutory because it completely the court of the docket the SC (RuIe
disposes of the case or a particular matter origin (RTC) and lawful 45l Pay docket
therein and there is nothing more for the and give a fees, and P and lawful fues
court to do after its rendition (Bairan vs. copy to the 500 as and P 500 for
adverse party. deposit for costs.
Tan Sui Lay, L-19460, Dec. 28, 1966).
costs with the
CA. Furnish Submit proof of
TEST for determining whether a judgment RTC and service of a
or order is final or interlocutory: Does lf adverse party copy to the
leave something to be done in the triat court copy ofsuch lower court and
with respect to the merits of the case? lf it (Rule 42).
adverse party.
does, it is interlocutory, hence, you cannot
Within 15 Within 15 Within 15 days
appeal yet; if it
does not, is final andit days from the days from from notice of
therefore you can appeal. (Reyes vs. De Leon, notice of the notice of the the judgment or
L-3720, June 24, 1952) judgment for decision to be order oi denial
notice of reviewed or of the MR or
. A judgment based on compromise is not appeal and from the new trial.
appealable and,is immediately executory. within 30 days denial of a
r This rule refers to appeals from RTC for records on MR or new
exercising ORIcINAL JURtSDICTION. An appeal. trial.
appeal on pure question of law CANNOT
be taken to the CA and such improper SECTION 3. PERIOD OF ORDINARY
appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Sec. APPEAL
2, Rule 50 (Regalado, F. Remediat Law
Compendium Vot 1. dn ed. p. 526). The appeal shall be taken within:
1. Fifteen (15) days trom notice of the
SECTION 2. MODES OF APPEAL judgment or final order appealed from;
2. Thirly (30) days from notice of the
judgment or final order where a record on
appeal is required;
3. Forty-eight (48) hours from notice of the
judgment or final order appealed from in
Case is Case is
habeas corpus cases.
Case is
decided by the decided by decided by the
RTC in its the RTC in RTC, CA, CTA DOCKET
original the exercise and
jurisdiclion. of its Sandiganbayan
appellate
Appealed to iurisdiction. Appealed to
the CA. Petition for the SC.
review with
the CA.
91
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
SECTION 6. RECORD ON AppEAL; FORM perfection of the appeal filed in due time and
AND CONTENTS THEREOF the expiration of the time to appealof the other
parties.
'1. Full names of all the parties to the
proceedings stated in the caption of the ln APPEALS BY RECORD ON APPEAL, the
record; court loses jurisdiction only over the subject
2. lnclude the judgment or final order from matter thereof upon approval of the records on
which the appeal is taken; appeal filed in due time and the expiration of
3. ln chronological order, copies of only such the time to appeal of the other parties.
pleadings, petitions, motions and all
interlocutory orders as are related to the Residual power of the court afier losing
appealed judgment for the proper jurisdiction but prior to the transmittal of the
understanding of the issue involved; original record or record on appeal: [O PAPAI
4. Together with such data as will show that 1. Qrder execution pending appeal under
the appeal was perfected on time Rule 39, Sec.2 (motion for execution was
(Material Data Rute); filed before the expiration of the period to
5. Every record on appeal exceeding 20 appeal);
pages must contain a suUfect index. 2. To issue orders for the preservation of the
rights of the parties which do not involve
SECTION 7. APPROVAL OF RECORD ON ' matters litigated by appeal;
APPEAL 3. To gpprove compromise prior to the
transmittal of the record;
Procedure if the appeal is through a record on 4. lermit appeal by an indigent;
appeal:
1. File record on appeal; 5. {llow withdrawal of the appeal.
2. Appellee may file an objection within five Duration of Residual Powerc
(5) days from his receipt thereof;
-
3. lf there is no objectionihe court may:
a. Approve it as presented; OR
b. Direct its amendment on its own or
upon the motion of the adverse party. Until the records are Until the Court of
4, lf an amendment is ordered the appellant transmitted to the
appellate court.
Appeals gives due
must redraft the record within the time course to the petition.
ordered or if there is no time, within ten
(10) days from receipt; SECTIOITI DUTY OF THE GLERK oF
5. Submit the record for approval with notice COURT OF'0.
THE LOWER COURT
on the adverse party.
Within 30 days after perfectio-n of the appeat, it
SECTION 8. JOINT REGORD ON APPEAL shall be the duty of the clerk of court:
1. To verify the correctness of the original
Where both parties are appellants, they may reeord or record on appeal, as the case
file a joint record on appeal within the time may be, and to make certification of its
provided.
92
, $cn 8e!s Gollege of {.ab
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
93
$m FeLs Gollrge of Leb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
14. Employees Compensation Commission; r No further extension shall be granted
15. Agricultural lnventions Board; except for the most compelling reason and
16. lnsurance Commission; in no case shall exceed 15 days.
17. Philippine Atomic Energy Commission;
18. Board of lnvestments; SECTION 5. HOW APPEAL TAKEN
19. Construction lndustry Arbitration
Commission; and 1. By filing a verified petition for review in
20. Voluntary arbitrators authorized by law. seven (7) legible copies;
2. With proof of service of a copy thereof on
A party adversely affected by a decision or the adverse party and on the court or
ruling of the CTA may file with the Supreme agency a quo;
Court a verified petition for review on certiorari
pursuant to Rute 45 (Sec. 12, RA g2g2 and
3. Pay to the clerk of court of CA docket and
other lawfulfees; and
A.M. 07-7-12-SC). 4. Deposit the sum of P 500 for costs.
Note: The Court of Appeals has jurisdiction
over orders, directives and decisions of the
Offtce of the Ombudsman in administrative Decision is immediately
disciplinary cases only. lt cannot, therefore, executory; not stayed
review the orders, directives or decisions of by an appeal.
the Office of the Ombudsman in criminal and Factual findings are
non-administrative cases (Golangco vs. Fung, conclusive upon CA if
Office of the Ombudsman, G,R.-Nos i4764'G supported by
1 47762, October-l 2, 2006| substantial evidence.
95
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
original or a legible certified copy of the entire . May declare that the record and its
record of the proceeding under review. accompanying transcripts and exhibits are
already sufficient to decide the issues.
SECTION 12. EFFECT OF APPEAL
SECTION 7. APPELLANT'S BRIEF
Generat Rule: Appeal shall NOT stay the
award, judgment, final order or resolution It shall be filed, within FORTY-FIVE (45)
sought to be reviewed. DAYS from receipt of the notice of the clerk of
court that all the evidence is attached to the
Exception: When the CA shall direct record:
otherwise upon such terms as it may deem 1. SEVEN (7) COPIES ofhis legibly
just. typewritten, mimeographed or
printed
brief; and
sEcTloN 13. SUBiIilSStON FOR DECIS|ON 2. With proof of service of two (2) copies
thereof upon the appellee.
Similar to Secfibn 9 of Rute 42.
. Failure to file appellant's brief on time is a
ground for dismissal of the appeal.
o lf a motion to dismiss an appeal has been
SECTION 1. TITLE OF CASES filed, it suspends the running of the period
for filing the appellant's briel as the same
ln all cases appealed to the CA under Rule 41, would be unnecessary should the motion
the title of the case shall remain the same but be granted.
party appealing the case shall be referred to . The failure of the appellant to make
as appellant and the adverse party as the specific assignment of errors in his brief or
appellee. page referenies to the record as re{uired
in this sec;tion is a ground for dismissal of
SECTION 2. COUNSEL AND GUARDIAN his appeal.
96
Sstt Fela Gollege of I'lb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
97
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
98
gstl Ftta €ollege of {,^rb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
contradicted by the evidence on record; Note: SC may dismiss the petition motu
and proprio.
11. When certain material facts and
circumstances have been oyerlooked by SEGTION 6. REVIEW DISCRETIONARY
the trial court which, if taken into account,
would after the result of the case in that Review will be granted only when there are
they would entitle the accused to special and important reasons therefore.
acquittal.
The following, while neither controlling nor fully
SECTION 2. TIME FOR FtLlNc; EXTENSTON measuring the court's discretion, indicate the
character of
the reasons which will be
Within 15 days from notice of the judgment or considered:
final order or resolution appealed from or a. Court a quo has decided a question of
denial of the petitioner's motion for new trial or substance, not theretofore determined by
MR filed in due time. the SC, or has decided it in a way
probably in accord with law or with the
The SC may for justifiable reasons grant an applicable decisions of the SC; or
extension of 30 days only within which to file b. Court a gao has so far departed from the
the petition. accepted and usual course of judicial
proceedings, or so far sanctioned such
SECTION 3. DOCKET AND OTHER departure by a lower court, as to call for an
LAWFUL FEES; PROOF OF SERV|GE exercise of the power of supervisibn.
99
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
5. ln actions filed under Rule 65, indicate the 4. Court may require the filing of a REPLY or
material dates showing when notice of the . such other pleadings as it may deem
judgment or final order or resolution was necessary;
received; 5. Determination of FACTUAL ISSUES, the
6. Filed in seven (7) legible copies, with proof court itself may conduct hearings or
of service on the respondent; delegate the reception of evidence on
7. Accompanied by clearly legible duplicate such issues to any of its members or to an
original or certified true copy of the appropriate court, agency or office (Sec.
judgment or final order or resolution; and
6,);
8. Gertificate of non-forum shopping; 6. Submission of Memoranda.
9. Payment of docket and other lawful fees;
and Note: The reception of evidence'may be
10. Deposit the amount of P500. delegated to a member of the Court of
Appeals or a judge of the lower court who is
r Failure to
comply with the foregoing not a public respondent.
requirements shall be sufficient ground for
the dismissal of the petition. SECTION 7. EFFECT OF FAILURE TO FILE
COMMENT
Substantial Compliance Rule
Rule 46 applies to actions for ceftiorarifiled in The case may be decided on the basis of the
the Court of Appeals but Rale 65 generally record, without prejudice to any disciplinary
supplements the same. Mere duplicate action which the court may take agalnst the
originals are sufficient under Rule 46 even if disobedient party.
Rule 65 requires only certified true copies
(Republic v. Carmel Development, lnc., G.R.
No.1 42572, Feb. 20, 2002).
SECTION 6. DETERMINATION OF
FACTUAL ISSUES
101
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
12, under RA
665
13. GSIS;
94
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
the questioned judgment or final order or the case with the active participation of
resolution through no fault attributable to him. said party invoking the plea (Tijam vs.
Sibonghanoy, G.R. No. L-21450, April 15,
lf he failed to avail of those other remedies 1968).
without sufficient justification, he cannot resort
to annulment provided in this Rule, otherwise Attack of a Void Judgment
he would benefit from his own inaction or When the judgment is null and void on its very
negligence. face, the judgment may be attacked:
1. DIRECTLY; or
Note: Annulment of Judgment does not apply 2. COLLATERALLY;
to judgments rendered by quasi-judicial
bodrbs. lt does nbt apply also to decisions or When the nullity is not apparent on the face of
orders of the Ombudsman in administrative the judgment, the judgment can only be
cases whose decisions or orders may be DIRECTLY attacked.
appealed to the Court of Appeals under Rule
43 (Macalalag v. Ombudsman, G.R. No" DIRECT ATTACK
147995, Mar.5,2A04. An independent action must be filed to
challenge the validity of the judgment whose
SECTION 2. GROUNDS FOR ANNULMENT nullity is not patent on its face.
ta2
5sn 8e[s @ollege ot Atb
2O1 1 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
which may
103
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Failure to appear at the preliminary conference 5. Failure of appellant to gerve and file the
a
is ground for dismissal of the petition required number of copies of his brief or
(Sec.l[h], Rule 50; Sec SIeJ, Rule 56). memorandum within the time provided by
these Rules;
SECTION 2. RECORD OF THE 6. fbsence of specific assignment of errors
CONFERENCE in the appellant's briel or of page
references to the record as required in Sec
SECTION 3. BINDING EFFECT OF THE 13, par a, c, d and f, Rule 44;
RESULTS OF THE CONFERENCE 7. Failure of the appellant to take the
lecessary steps for the conection or
ln the CA, this procedural device may be completion of the record within the time
availed of not only in original actions but also limited by the court in its order;
in cases on appeal wherein a new trial was 8. Failure of the appellant to eppear at the
granted on the ground of newly discovered preliminary conference under Rule 48 or to
evidence. comply with the orders, circulars, or
directives of the court without justifiable
The CA can act as a trier of facts. HENCE, the cause; and
preliminary conference authorized is a L The fact that the order or judgment
convenient adjunct to such power and appealed from is 4ot appealable.
function.
Note: With the exception of Section 1 (b),
dismissal of an appeal is DIRECTORY and not
mandatory (Advincula v. lAC, G.R. No.75310,
Dec. 10, 1987).
SECTION 1. WHEN ALLOWED
OTHER GROUNDS for the dismissal of an
At its own instance or upon motion of a party, appealare: (AMF)
the court may hear the parties in orit 1. By ggreement of the parties, as where the
argument on the merits of a case or any case was amicably seitled by them;
material incident in connection therewith. 2, Where the appealed case has become
gqoot or academic; and
SECTION 2. CONDUCT OF ORAL 3. Where the appeal is frivolous or dilatory.
ARGUMENT
APPEAL (RF-PUSANAN)
z.#&$fuffi&ff4or
L Failure of the gecord on appeal to show on
its face that the appeal was taken within
to it
the period fixed by these ruleg;
these
2. Failure to lile the notice of appeal or the
record on appeal within the period
prescribed by these rules;
3. Failure of the appellant to pay the docket
and other lawfulfees as provide in Sec. 5,
Rule 40 and Sec 4, Rule 41;
4. lnauthorized alterations, omissions or
additions in the approved record on appeal
as provide in Sec 4, Rule 44;
to4
5un Fell Gottege of Lsb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
A resolution of the Court of Appeals dismissing SECTION 3. QUORUITI AND VOTING IN THE
the appeal and remanding the case to the trial COURT
court for further proceedings is
merely
INTERLOCUTORY. Hence, a motion for its To be binding, a judgment must be duly signed
reconsideration filed year later may be and promulgated during the incumbency of the
entertained and granted. judge who signed it.
The Court of Appeals may dismiss the appeal
outright even without motion. Note: Where the decision was promulgated
after two of the three justices necessary to
The remedy if dismissed for improper appeal: conptitute a quorum in a division had lost their
To re-file it in the proper forum but has ta be authority to act as justices, said decision is nUll
within the prescribed period. and void (Lao v. To-Chip, G.R. No. 76594,
Feb.26, 1988).
SECTION 3. WTHDRAWAL OF APPEAL
SECTION 4. DISPOSITION OF THE CASE
A matter of right before the filing of the
appellee's brief. SECTION 5. FORM OF DECISION
Note: While under this section, an appeal The requirement for the statement of facls and
may be withdrawn by the appellants as a the law refers to a decision or for that 4after a
matter of right at any time before the filing of final resolution. The same are not required on
the appellee's brief; however the rule does not minute resolutions since these usually dispose
apply where the notice of withdrawal fited by of the case not on its merits but on procedural
new counsel did not bear the appellant's or technical considerations.
conformity (Pioneer Insurance and Surety
Corp. v. De Dios Transportation, G.R. No. With respect to petitions for review and
147010, July 18,2003). motions for reconsideration, the Constitution
merely requires a statement of the legal basis
for the denial thereof or refusal of due course
thereto. The court may opt, but it is not
required to issue an extended resolution
SECTION 1. WHEN CASE DEEII'IED thereon.
SUBMITTED FOR JUDGMENT
Decisions and resolutions of a court in
A. ln ordinary appeals appealed cases shall clearly and distinctly
1. No hearing on the merits - Upon the state the findings of fact and the conclusions
filing of the last pleading, brief, or of law on which they are based, which may be
memorandum; or expiration of the contained in the decision or final resolution
period for its filing; itself, or adopted by reference from those set
2. -
Hearing is held Upon its termination forth in the decision, order, or resolution
or upon the filing of the last pteading
or memorandum as may be required
or permitted to be filed by the court; or
expiration of the period for its filing;
105
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
General Rulei The appellate court can only SECTION 2. SECOND MOTION FOR
rule on the basis of grounds raised as erors RECONSIDERATION
on appeal.
Exceptions:
The rules prohibit a second motion for
reconsideration by the SAME party.
1. Those affecting jurisdiction over the
subject matter; Note: The prohibition does not include
2. Evidently plain and clerical errors within v. CA, G.R. No.
interlocutory orders (Dizon
the contemplation of law; 96296, June 18. 1992).
3. ln order to subserve the ends of justice;
4. Matters raised in the trial court having SECTION 3. RESOLUTION OF THE MOTION
some bearing on the issue which the
parties failed to raise or which the lower Ninety (90) days from the date the CA
court ignored; and declares it submitted for resolution.
5. Matters closely related to an eror
assigned. This time limit applies only to MR in CA. lt
does not apply to MR in SC, pursuant to the
SECTION 7, JUDGMENT WHERE THERE exception in Sec. 2 (b), Rule 56.
ARE SEVERAL PARTIES
SECTION 4. STAY OF EXECUTION
SECTION 8. QUESTIONS THAT MAY BE
DECIDED
106
9m Fell €ollege of Lslo
2011 CENTRATIZED BAR OPERATIONS
SECTION 4. PROCEDURE
B. APPEALEDCASES
ro7
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
108
$un Fell GoIIep of Lcb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
disposed of to prevent its being found by Remedial Law Compendium Vot 1. * ed., p.
the applicant or any authorized person; 622).
4. ln actions against a person guilty of fraud
in contracting the debt (dolo causante) or THREE (3) STAGES in the grant of
incurring or performing an obligation upon Preliminary Attachment
, which the action is based (dolo incidente); 1. The court issues the order granting the
5. ln actions against a
party who has application;
removed or disposed of his property, or is 2. The writ of attachment issues pursuant to
about to do so, with intent to defraud his the order granting the writ;
creditors; 3. The writ is implemented.
6. ln actions against non-residents not found
in the Philippines, or on whom summons Note: For the initial two stages, it is NOT
is served by publication. necessary that jurisdiction over the person of
the defendant be first obtained.
Note: The foregoing enumeration is
EXCLUSIVE. Except for No. 6, all the grounds HOWEVER, once the implementation of the
contemplate the commission of fraud by the writ commences, the court must have acquired
person against whom it is issued. jurisdiction over the defendant for without such
jurisdiction, the court has no power or authority
Purposes; to act in any manner against the defendant
1. To seize the property of the debtor in (Mangila vs. CA, GR /Vo. 125027, August 12,
advance of final judgment and to hold it for 2002).
. purposes of satisfying the said judgment
(lnsular Bank of Asia and America v. CA, Methods to procure attachment:
t90SCRA 629);and a.'Writ may be prayed for in the complaint
2. To enable the court to acquire jurisdiction itself providing that allegations warranting
over the action by the actual or its issuance are made therein.
constructive seizure of the property in b. May be issued pursuant to a separate
those instances where personal service of motion for attachment whenever the writ
summons on the creditor cannot be is not prayed for in the original complaint
effecled.
SECTION 2. ISSUANCE AND CONTENTS
OF ORDER
109
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
the writ totally defective as the judge issuing it SECTION 7. ATTACHMENT OF REAL AND
acts in excess of jurisdiction PERSONAL PROPERTY
Ratio: No notice to the adverse party or What may be the subject of attachment:
hearing of the application is required, as the 1. Real property or any interest therein;
time which the hearing wiil entail could be 2. Personal property capable of manual
enough to enable the defendant to abscond or delivery;
dispose of his property before the writ issues 3. Stocks or shares or interest therein;
(Regalado, F. Remedial Law Compendium Vot 4. Debts and credits, 'including bank
1. dh ed., p.624). deposits, financial interest, royalties,
commissions and other personal property
Contents of the Affidavit not capable of manual delivery; or
1. A sufficient cause of action exists; 5. lnterest of the party against whom
2. Case is one of those mentioned in Sec. i; attachment is issued in properg belonging
3. No other sufficient security for the claim to the estate of the decedent, whether as
sought to be enforced by action; heir, legatee, or devisee.
4. Amount due to the applicant or possession
of which is entitled to recover is as much Par. (3) and (4) refer to gamishment. By such
as the sum for which the order is granted notice of gamishment, the court acquires
above all legal counterclaims. jurisdiction over the garnishee and the latter
becomes a foreed intervenor in the case.
SECTION 4. CONDITION OF APPLICANT'S
BOND Debt means some definite amount of money,
ascertained or capable of being ascertained,
Bond posted by the attaching creditor answers which may be paid over to the sheriff or to the
for the damages and costs which may be court, while credits and perconal property
adjudged to the adverse party arising from and are something belonging to the defendant, but
by reason of the aftachment. in possession and under the control of the
garnishee (Feria, Civil Procedure Annotated,
. SECTION 5.
MANNER OF ATTAGHING Vol.2, 2001 Ed., p.294).
PROPERTY (Rule on prior or
Contemporaneous Service) . Property legally attached is property in
custodia legrs and cannot be interfered
Note: Levy shall not be made unless preceded with without the permission of the proper
y contemporaneously accompanied by: court, but this is confined to cases where
(scABo) the property belongs to the defendant or
1. $ervice of summons, one in which the defendant has proprietary
2. A copy of the comptaint; interest.
3. Application for attachment;
1 Affidavit and lond of the appticant; and
5. Qrder and writ of attachment. Principle of Seniority of Liens
Where the property attached by the judgment
BUT'prior or contemporaneous service of
that of the
summons shall NOTApply when:
1. Summons could not be served personally
or by substituted service;
2. Defendant is a resident of the philippines
tempor4rily absent therefrom;
3. Defendant is a non-resident; and
4. The action is one rn rem or quas-in rem.
Note: All properties exempt ftom execution
are likewise exempt from attachment (Sec. J
Rule 57;Sec. 73, Rute 39).
110
$sn 8t!s GoIIrge ot Leb
2OI1 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
tlL
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
tt shall be awarded after hearing and inctuded The act has already
in the judgment. been performed and this
lf the judgment of the appettate court be act has violated the
favorable to the party against whom the
attachment was issued, he must claim
damages during the pendency of the appeal.
Requisites: (lRU)
Procedure for claiming damages ouilined in
Sec. 20 is EXCLUSIVE. Hence, such claims
1. lnvasion of the right is material and
substantial;
for damages cannot be the subject of an 2. light of the complainant is clear and
independent action.
unmistakable; and
Exception: 3. prgent and paramount necessity for the
writ to prevent serious damages.
1. Where the principal case was dismissed
for lack of jurisdiction by the trial court lnjunction may be an action in itself, brought
without giving an opportunity to the party
whose property was attached to apply for
specifically to restrain or command the
performance of an act. As an action, it is
and prove his claim; and
immediately executory under Sec" 4, Rule 39.
2. Where the damages by reason of the
attachment was sustained by a third
person who was not a party to the action General rule: lt will not issue against acts
' wherein such writ was issued.
already consummated.
Note: Any award of damages for the Exception: lf the acts complained of are
wrongful issuance of a provisional remedy continuing in nature and were in derogation of
plaintiffs rights at the outset.
should be recovered in the SAME CASE. The
recovery of damages cannot be had in a Where writ is not available:
separate action.
1. Foreclosure of a mortgage by a
government bank (PD 385);
2. Commencement and performance of
infrastructure projects by the government
SECTION 1. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (RA 8795); and
DEFINED; GLASSES patents or
172
Seir Fels GoIIege sf Ilb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
113
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
It4
9m Fels Gollege ot Ltrb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
Note: This provisional remedy may be A person who refuses or neglects to deliver a
resorted lo during the pendency of an appeal property, within his control and which is the
or even after the judgment has become final subject of the action, to the receiver may be
and executory. punished for CONTEMPT and liable to the
115
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
and may be recovered in a separate action d. Actual market value of the property.
(De la Rosa & Co. v. De Borja, G.R. No. L-
28611, January 30, 1929). 3. Applicant must give a bond, executed to
the adverse party and double the value of
the property.
SECTION 3. ORDER
SECTION 1. APPLICATION
SEGTION 4, DUTY OF THE SHERIFF
A writ of replevin must be applied for at the
commencement of the action or at any time
SECTION 5. RETURN OF THE PROPERTY
before the defendant files his answer, for
which reason there can be no replevin before
the appellate courts.
SEGTION 6. DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY
BY SHERIFF
116
$sn Fsls @ollege of {.eb
2011 CENTRALIZED BAR OPERATIONS
the property, as they only hold the property Note: Where the right to support is put in issue
subject to the finaljudgment in the action. by the pleading or the fact from which the right
is in controversy or has not been established,
Surety's liability under the replevin bond the court cannot grant support pendente lite
should be included in the final judgment to (Francisco v. Zandueta, G.R. No. L-43794
prevent duplicity of suits or proceedings. August 9, 1935).
Note: The judgment may be in the Note: lncludes "other forms of support",
ALTERNATIVE, i.e., for the detivery of the meaning medical attendance, housing,
property to the party entitled to it, or for the cloth ing, education, etc.
value of the property in case the same cannot
be delivered plus damages. SECTION 5. ENFORCEMENT OF ORDER
SECTION 1. APPLICATION
r77
r.18
REMEDIAL LAW
CIVIL PROCEDURE
w
ffiffi
At any time prior to q3
satisfaction of judgment. ;nt of
At the commencement of At the cor$
At any stage prior to the Note: /f rnay be availed of
the action or any time prior
judgment or final order. even afterjudgment
the actiorffi ffi ffiffiffiffiwd*ffi tor
ime
to the entry of judgment. answer ist ffi
becomes final under Sec.
41 Rule39 w. u'ffi1
&ffiT
ffi
w,
#p'"" "%\&
File verified application
and applicant's bond; if
File verifi ed application
application is included in
and applicant's bond;
the initiatory pleading, the
File affidavits and application may also be File affidavits and File verified application;
adverse party should be
applicant's bond. included in initiatory applicant's bond. bond not required,
served with summons pleading in actions for
together with a copy of the
foreclosure of mortgage.
initiatory pleading and the
applicant's bond
Required.
Except: Great or
irreparable injury would
Not required. May be result/ extreme urgency Not required. May be
issyed ex parfe. and applicant will suffer issued ex parfe.
grave injustice and
irreparable injury (Sec. 5
Rule 58).
Court where action is
Only the court where the pending, the CA or the
Courts where action is
action is pending; Lower
SC even if action is
ffi#&rnot
court, CA or SC provided pending in the lower court. {3tr fu&Bfe
pending, the CA or the
action is pending in the
SC even if action is Appellate court may allow
same court which issues
pending in the lower court. application for receivership
the injunction. Also with
to be decided by the court
Sandiganbayan and CTA.
. Sufficient cause of
aclion; . Applicant is entitled to r Applicant has interest
o Case is covered by the relief demanded; in the property or
Sec.l Rule 57; . Act/s complained of fund, subject matter of
o No other sufficient would work injustice the action or
security for the claim to the applicant if not proceeding; entitled to
exists; and enjoined; and . Properly or fund is in
r Amount due to r Acts sought to be danger of being lost
or removed or adverse
Bond executed to the adverse party in the amount fixed by the court to cover the costs
which may be adjudged to the adverse party and all damages that he may sustain by
reason of the granting of provisional remedy prayed for, if the court shall finally property to the
adjudge that the applicant was not entitled thereto. parg if such return
payment to the adverse
party ofsuch sum as he
may recover from the
By counter-bond: Party against whom the provisional remedy is availed of may move for the discharge of the
provisional remedy granieO Oy filing a counter-bond in an amount equal to that fix'ed by the court to the value of the Not applicable.
property if with reipect to a particular property to secure the payment of any judgment that the adverse party may
recover in the action.
Filing of counter-bond
made only upon showing
that the issuance or
continuance thereof would
cause ireparable damage 2 BOND requirement:
Cash deposit may be to the party or person 1. Bond filed by the Amount of counter-bond
made in lieu of the enjoined while the applicant; and should also be double the
counter-bond. applicant can be fullY 2. Bond filed by the
compensated for such receiver.
damages as he may
suffer; counter-bond alone s&fld
will not suffice to discharge n\t\1
;.kF?:
€ *f
rt"a
r
the injunction.
ktu
dkffi I
Wi
ld
.
award.
Adverse party may recover damages in the same action. "ffiff- *'& ffiffiffirse the
fl?*?**9"-ffi
l@