Sie sind auf Seite 1von 4

1

Week 2 Assignment

Adam See

Grantham University

April 21, 2020


2

Summary analysis of the discussion comments

Aryanna Savage, brings up an interesting aspect, partner with environmental agencies

(dealing with pollution). At no time while watching this video, I did not even consider the

impact it would have on the environment. Ensure that the environment is protected is an

important topic for a lot of people and doing anything that can be done to lower the impact

would be greatly beneficial. Everyone should be able to go outside without having to worry

about if the air quality or pollution will cause them any kind of harm.

Jorge Diaz-Druet brings up some good point when it comes to microchipping. To me

for microchipping an employee, is a severe incursion on an individual’s privacy. This to me is

a reason why one should not even think about having a microchip implanted in the body. I do

not believe that any business or government entity should be able to microchip any individual

for any reasons. I know several aspects of our lives are going digital, but this is beyond

ethical.

Alternatives

For microchipping, there could be a few positives to it. It could be utilized as an

instrument for wellbeing records. This innovation could be utilized for new specialists to see

your whole clinical history, particularly if the specialist is in an alternate organization. Trust

that companies would utilize this gadget as tracking them during business hours and killing

the tracking when the go home for the afternoon. Truly, even this innovation could be utilized

as a type of installment as opposed to hefting around charge cards and such. In light of the

entirety of that, I don't accept an individual ought to be microchipped. However, I think that

those with medical issues should carry an RFID device that can contain their medical

information to make it easy for any doctor to be able to access their information.
3

Application

With respect to business for nature, I do attempt to ensure that myself and those that

underneath me at work follow the law with regards to the environment. I do make an honest

effort to ensure that when we deal with and discard perilous/hazardous materials that there is

no breaks to where it might impact the water or ground. Sometimes this works, while other

times it does not. However in the event that there is a dangerous material spill, we do need to

advise the proper offices. Not revealing that has some adjudicator your moral side. Thus, for

me, I will report each risky material spill as a sanity check. By me doing this has brought

about other junior and senior Sailors and Marines to report spills.

Action

Not every person has similar perspectives with regards to the environment or in any

event when it come microchipping. The key takeaway is take your own convictions and set

them aside. Since your own convictions may not be moral sound or could negatively affect

moral conduct when you follow up on those convictions. I took in the class in general

disagrees with the microchip embed in people. For me, I would need to take some real time to

contemplate before I would consider having a microchip embedded in me.


4

Reference (or References, as applicable)

Klitou, D. (2011, December). Privacy by Design and Privacy-Invading Technologies:


Safeguarding Privacy, Liberty, and Security in the 21st Century. Legisprudence:
International Journal for the Study of Legislation, 5(3), 297-329. Retrieved April 21,
2020, from http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=4&sid=d3363c98-b9ce-
4b80-bc41-54533ed5fe93%40pdc-v-sessmgr01&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ
%3d%3d#db=a9h&AN=75324000

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen