President Donald J Trump 4-1-2021

White House, USA

@realDonaldTrump

20210104-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to President Donald J Trump

Sir,
as a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.

While I am an Australian nevertheless because the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution

Act 1900 (UK) was also party based upon the U.S.A Constitution and its 14 Amendments I have
an obvious interest as to what is applicable in the US Constitution.
.
Personally being well aware from how fraud can undermine a political election, I in 2001
commenced to battle and ion 16 July 2006 finally succeeded. It may have been too late to
overcome the fraudulent election but at least I never gave up and succeeded in the courts.

Over the last few years I particularly was following “Not my President” claims, and other issues,
such as, the alleged “Russian collusion”, Impeachment and other issues, where allegedly the
Democrats wanting to do no more but to get out the truth. Well Congressman Adam Schiff
publically claiming that he had seen the “evidence”, this even so the alleged “evidence” never
was presented in the Impeachment hearing before the Senate.
Now however with the U.S.A Presidential election somehow now they are not interested in the
“evidence”. I understand that Texas now is warning against any violent backlash to dispute the
Electoral College votes.
I understood that Lenin was using the fear to get people on his side only later to act against them.
Fear should never rule our credibility.

I understand from “Hope Is Not Lost! Featuring Attorney Sidney Powell”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YTlhqd7PM0&list=PLktX9QZIBf8EGXOdrD41w_LCpW
ehxOnUU also at https://www.sidneypowell.com/media/flashpoint-hope-is-not-lost-featuring-
attorney-sidney-powell and https://www.bitchute.com/video/P952ZtQYmKJc/ the Ukraine
Government made the following statement (at 41.43 of the video);
QUOTE
Good afternoon, dear colleagues. Today’s press conference is dedicated to new facts
revealing international corruption and external governance of Ukraine.

Treasury under the request from Democratic senators. They really didn’t want us to publish
what we are going to release today.

Because of the leaked information about today’s press conference last week it was
announced that I was being sanctioned by politicians from the US Department of the
Treasury under the request from Democratic senators. They really didn’t want us to publish
what we are going to release today.
p1 4-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 1. Evidence of withdrawal through financial “holes” of millions of dollars stolen from the
Ukrainian people, laundered with the help of banks and laundromats in various
jurisdictions and their subsequent transfer to the accounts of the company belonging to
Biden family.

2. New recordings of conversations between the persons who appear top be the fifth
President of Ukraine Petro Poreshenko and the former US Vice President Joe Biden,
testifying tornal governance.

3. We will also unveil colossal corruption schemes related to the procurement of coal and
gas, due to which Ukrainians pay 30% higher utility tariffs.
At that time, the highest officials of Ukraine and the United States participated in these
schemes.
END QUOTE

Obviously it should be investigated which Treasury officials were involved and which
Democratic senators were using them to do this.
Surely the Democrats wanting to pursue the truth should support this to be exposed.
.
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact-check-biden-voter-protection-not-idUSKBN27E2VH
QUOTE
The clip shared by Trump, McEnany and others starts around the 19:13 mark, when Biden
tells Pfeiffer and Lovett, “Secondly, we’re in a situation where we have put together—and
you guys did it for President Obama’s administration before this—we have put together I
think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American
politics.”
END QUOTE

While the so-called Fact checkers claim it was a “slip of the tong”, that is not what I view Fact
checkers should be about. They should confirm or deny it was stated.
They also claimed

QUOTE
The posts falsely ask if the video shows the Democratic presidential candidate “admit(ting)
to voter fraud.”
END QUOTE

This shows the bias as now asking a question is “falsely” to do so?

Asking a question I view cannot be deemed “falsely” where what was referred to was actually
stated. As such, the bias by the alleged Fact checkers I view is well shown.

From the numerous articles and video’s I have read and watched I have absolutely no doubt that
there was an elaborate fraud going on. Reportedly even finding an old school bus with a vote
counting machine and ballots in the dessert.

Ex dolo malo non oritur action. Out of fraud no action arises. Cowper, 343; Broom's Max. 349.

Ex malificio non oritur contractus. A contract cannot arise out of an act radically wrong and illegal. Broom's
Max. 851.

p2 4-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 Ex nudo pacto non oritur action. No actions arise on a naked contract without a consideration. See Nudum
Pactum.

Ex turpi causa non oritur action. No action arises out of an immoral consideration.

Ex turpi contractu non oritur actio. No action arises on an immoral contract.

Fraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270.

Fraus et jus numquam cohabitant. Fraud and justice never agree together. Wing. 680.

Qui inique non erit aequi - He who has committed iniquity, shall not have equity. Francis' Max., Max. 2.

Non faciat malum, ut inde veniat bonum. You are not to do evil that good may come of it. 11 Co. 74.

http://familyguardian.tax-
tactics.com/Subjects/LawAndGovt/ChallJurisdiction/AuthoritiesArticle/AuthOnJurisdiction.htm
QUOTE
37 Am Jur 2d at section 8 states, in part: "Fraud vitiates every transaction and all contracts.
Indeed, the principle is often stated, in broad and sweeping language, that fraud destroys
the validity of everything into which it enters, and that it vitiates the most solemn contracts,
documents, and even judgments."
END QUOTE

We have seen that the British High Court in 2018 declared that Prime Minister Boris Johnston
unlawfully requested Her Majesty to prorogue the Parliament and as such held that it never
eventuated.

We, in Australia, had the High Court of Australia at various occasions determine that certain
Members of Parliament were not entitled to be Members of Parliament and ousted them,
regardless that they had made an oath/affirmation before the Governor-General. As such, I view
it is not relevant if Joe Biden were to make any oath to accept the Presidency as if it is
established he was involved in fraud then his swearing in is of no legal consequence.
In that regard neither then Court Kamala Harris claim to become President, because if Joe Biden
was not validly elected then so was Kamala Harris.
Neither can it be claimed that Joe Biden removal allows Kamala Harris to become President
because her claim must rest then on the validity of the election of Joe Biden.
While the Constitution sets out the method of electing a President, if Joe Biden however can be
deemed ineligible to be a candidate for the presidential election because of his dealings with
foreign countries then neither can Kamala Harris in my view claim she nevertheless was validly
elected. After all, Kamala Harris was not elected in her own right but on a ticket with Joe Biden.

Obviously, there appears to be an obstruction of justice, at least in my view, where Hunter Biden
was known to have serious issues and yet not until recently it was announced an investigation
was conducted, since 2018?

As I understand it, the 20 January date is set by an Act of Congress, and is not mandated by the
constitution, and as such, where there is an issue of FRAUD then any inauguration should be
delayed until the “FRAUD” issue has been appropriately addressed.

It is totally irrelevant, that the courts may not have heard and determined any allegations of
FRAUD, as each and every Member of Congress has sworn an oath/affirmation to adhere to the
constitution and as such cannot ignore any claims of FRAUD.

p3 4-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
Therefore, I view that irrespective of Vice President Mike Pence making a decision or not to
declare anyone to be the winner of the presidential election in the end it cannot be legally applied
where issues of FRAUD haven’t been resolved. Again, the British High Court made clear that
Her Majesty having prorogued the Parliament was not relevant where the Prime Minister lacked
the legal position to request Her Majesty to do so.

In the circumstances prevailing I view that Vice President Mike Pence ought to postpone any
decision until the “FRAUD” allegations have been appropriately investigated, as he is not bound
by the 6 January date where FRAUD is part of a claim by a Member of Congress.
.
As I understand it Vice President Mike Pence also has the position to be aware of intelligence
about concerns of Joe Biden and as such I view cannot proceed to even declare Joe Biden to be
the successful candidate for the presidential election for this either until the final intelligent
report has been provided, as required by the Executive Order of 12 September 2018 that would
clear Joe Biden of any suspicion or otherwise wrongdoing.

https://uncoverdc.com/2020/12/31/jovan-hutton-pulitzer-requests-access-to-paper-ballots-in-georgia/
Jovan Hutton Pulitzer Requests Access to Paper Ballots in
Georgia
QUOTE
Expert witness, Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, gave a presentation to the Georgia State Senate Judiciary
Subcommittee on Dec. 30 detailing how he can perform a forensic examination of paper ballots to detect
kinematic artifacts. Pulitzer is a pattern recognition expert holding over 200 patents. His patents are used on
12 billion handheld devices around the world. The subcommittee met to hear evidence of alleged fraud from
multiple witnesses assembled by Trump election campaign lawyer Rudy Giuliani pertaining to the 2020
Georgia state Presidential election.
END QUOTE

There are as I understand it reports that despite federal law prohibiting the destructing of ballot
details for at least 22 months it nevertheless was eventuating. I view that this is a very serious
matter and the destruction of details (ballots, etc) must be deemed an admission of FRAUD.

QUOTE Dowling v Dowling, Exchequer (Ireland) (1869) 10 ICLR 236

Facts showing the circumstances and position of the parties whose conduct is in question are
generally relevant to such conduct. So, evidence of opportunity is relevant to the question
whether a certain act was done. Circumstantial evidence is admissible not only in the
absence of direct evidence, but also in aid of direct evidence.
END QUOTE

I also view that Dominion may be committing “contempt of court” with threats suing people,
when they have litigation before the courts if they do not seize and desist.

One obviously may also consider that Joe Biden might be validly arrested regarding crimes he
may have been involved in, either directly or indirectly, such as bribery, extortion, etc, even if
this were finances channeled through his son businesses and could be placed under arrest
awaiting trial. If then Biden’s lawyers were to argue that Biden is mentally incompetent to stand
trial or to even be held in prison then obviously it cannot then be deemed he is fit and proper to
be President.

I understood from a video that Kamala Harris, prior to the election, made clear that the riots, etc,
would continue until after the election and in my view this could be used against her that she may
have condoned violent or even supported this which could be deemed insurrection to the
p4 4-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
government, etc. I understand that reportedly Texan lawmakers are concerned that the challenge
to the Electoral College votes could result in violence and this may underline that this
insurrection is shown to be working.
Obviously, if Joe Biden was to be incarcerated due to alleged crimes, etc, then this likely would
prevent him to be inaugurated as President. Not that I seek to imply he would be inaugurated, but
merely indicates the problem to do so if held in prison facilities. Obviously, if Joe Biden was
held in prison facilities awaiting trail then Kamala Harris couldn’t be sworn in as Vice President,
as she needs Joe Biden to be sworn in as President before she can stake any claims.

In my view, Jovan Hutton Pulitzer ought to be given the opportunity to check the ballot papers.
In my view where there is an Executive Order of Jovan Hutton Pulitzer 2 September 2018 then
this should ensure that Jovan Hutton Pulitzer can check the ballots, etc. Also, where the
reportedly were incorrect water marks on ballots, allegedly because of printed elsewhere, I view
this cannot be accepted. Neither so the California ballots which I understand were all in violation
of California legislative provisions, and hence those Electoral College votes cannot be deemed
valid in law.
If Jovan Hutton Pulitzer finds that indeed fraudulent ballots have been included and perhaps
those correspond with the after midnight added ballots then this further would marry the various
fraud issues.
I understand that the leader in the Senate claims that he prefer not to challenge the election result,
somehow not to undermine the constitutional system, however to me this is absurd. The
“Framers of the Constitution” designed a system and anyone perpetrating a FRAUD is
undermining the constitutional system, and not those who seek to challenge a FRAUDULENT
conduct. No one can serve the true meaning and application of a constitution by accepting a
fraudulent CONDUCT. Those who voted are entitled, at least in my view, that their votes are not
eroded in various manner by fraudulent conduct, being it by fraudulent ballots, unlawful ballots,
multiple voting, etc, etc. Any Member of Congress who is willing to accept a FRAUDULENT
conduct I view must vacate his/her seat as that Member by this violated the laid up duties as a
Member of Congress.

In my view, there must be a special “Court of Disputed Returns” where election challenged are
to be heard. On a State level, the State Supreme Court could sit as a “Court of Disputed Returns”
on behalf of the State legislature. In regardless of federal elections SCOTUS could sit as a “Court
of Disputed Returns” for Congress. It would not require any additional judges but merely that
existing judges using their legal specialty to hear and determine on behalf of the relevant
legislature any election dispute. This may avoid “no legal standing” issues where the legislation
would set out who has a legal standing to litigate. In my view any such “Court of Disputed
Returns” likely would have held that the disputed election were in fact unlawful, as the “Court of
Disputed Returns” would represent the legislators, and not those Secretary of State, election
official, etc, who change the rules.

It appears to me that people voted for a “People’s President”, both in 2016 and 2020, and the
FRAUD perpetrated in the 2020 presidential election should never deny the voters choice.

We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.

Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (Our name is our motto!)

p5 4-1-2021 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati