Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Document Page 1 of 11
IN RE: *
*
INTERNATIONAL STORYTELLING CENTER, * CASE NO. 2:10-bk-53299
* Chapter 11
Debtor *
11 U.S.C. § 365(a) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6006(a), seeks the Court's approval to reject certain
executory contracts between ISC and the National Storytelling Network ("NSN"). Specifically,
the Debtor seeks to reject Restructuring Agreement dated November 6, 1998 between ISC and
NSN (the "Restructuring Agreement"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit No. 1;
Festival Agreement dated November 1, 1998 (the "Festival Agreement"), a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit No. 2; and Settlement Agreement dated October 3, 2004 (the
2. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(a).
Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1409(a). This is a core proceeding
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
3. In 1973, Jonesborough resident Jimmy Neil Smith founded and staged the first
National Storytelling Festival under the sponsorship of the Jonesborough Civic Trust. This
event generated a storytelling revival in America. In 1975, Smith founded and formed the
National Association for the Preservation and Perpetuation of Storytelling, Inc. ("NAPPS"), a
not-for-profit entity organized for the purpose of continuing and perpetuating the revival of the
art of storytelling.
4. NAPPS later received tax exempt status from the Internal Revenue Service and
thereafter operated as an entity exempt from federal income taxes pursuant to Section 501(c)(3)
2
Case 2:10-bk-53299 Doc 57 Filed 02/11/11 Entered 02/11/11 12:11:30 Desc Main
Document Page 3 of 11
6. From its inception, through approximately 1998, NAPPS and NSA created a
national and international following that served a growing membership who were engaged in
directors of NSA regarding the future growth and vision of storytelling and the role of NSA in that
including the building of the storytelling center in order to enhance Jonesborough's recognition
on a national and international basis, while another contingent on the board felt that NSA should
8. As a result, two separate entities emerged from the NSA, ISC and NSN.
9. NSA continued to operate as an entity exempt from federal income taxes under
the original NAPPS Charter. NSA elected a new board of directors. NSN was formed as a
separate entity by certain of the former board of directors of NSA. NSA's name was changed to
Storytelling Foundation Center and, on June 5, 2003, NSA again changed its name to the
"National Storytelling Center," the name under which it operates today. NSA also, in 2005,
obtained authority to operate under the assumed names of "National Association for the
rarely operates under or uses such assumed names but continues to place value on the names
10. As part of the separation of NSA into ISC and NSN, NSA (ISC) and the National
Storytelling Membership Association (NSN) entered into two agreements, the Restructuring
3
Case 2:10-bk-53299 Doc 57 Filed 02/11/11 Entered 02/11/11 12:11:30 Desc Main
Document Page 4 of 11
11. The purpose of the Restructuring Agreement was to define the roles of the two
entities and to set forth the continuing obligations of ISC to NSN and of NSN to ISC. These
continuing obligations included, without limitation, the development of plans and programs; the
obligation of ISC to not solicit or encourage any person to become a member of ISC; the
obligation of NSN to not build or construct a storytelling center similar to that built and
contemplated to be built by ISC; the granting of a license by ISC to NSN of the copyright and
production rights then owned by NSA and in potential copyrights and production rights to
archived materials; the right of both ISC and NSN to approve either party's transfer or granting
of a license to a third party of the copyright and production rights then shared by ISC and NSN;
ISC's right to access the database of NSN; the obligation of each party to share the name,
address and telephone number of any independent data basis developed by either party; the
exclusive right granted to ISC to operate the retail sales shop at the National Storytelling Center
located in Jonesborough; the requirement of ISC to provide twenty (20) hours of accounting
services to NSN for $500.00 per month; and ISC's right to the grant awarded annually by the
12. ISC contends that the Restructuring Agreement is an executory contract which
13. The purpose of the Festival Agreement was to set forth the respective obligations
and responsibilities of ISC and NSN with respect to the annual Festival and a mechanism to
generate funds for NSN so that it could continue as an independent entity and share in the
history and tradition of storytelling. The Festival Agreement likewise created numerous
continuing obligations of ISC and NSN including, without limitation, the creation and continued
participation by ISC and NSN in the Production Advisory Committee, and the division of income
4
Case 2:10-bk-53299 Doc 57 Filed 02/11/11 Entered 02/11/11 12:11:30 Desc Main
Document Page 5 of 11
from the annual Festival whereby NSN was to receive a "guaranteed eighteen percent (18%) of
14. ISC contends that the Festival Agreement is an executory contract which ISC is
Agreement, disputes arose between ISC and NSN regarding the interpretation and
responsibilities of each party under the Restructuring Agreement and the Festival Agreement.
ISC and NSN then engaged in a mediation through a third party mediator that resulted in the
16. The purpose of the Settlement Agreement was to resolve the parties' differences
by further defining their respective obligations and, similar to the Restructuring Agreement and
the Festival Agreement, the Settlement Agreement created numerous continuing obligations of
ISC and NSN. These continuing obligations include, without limitation, the creation and
continued participation by ISC and NSN in a Sponsorship Committee and related activities; the
right of NSN to conduct an audit of the annual Festival; the continuation of the Festival Advisory
Committee in a revised format; an annual joint meeting of the Executive Committee of ISC and
NSN; ISC's granting to NSN the use of ISC's facilities and staff at various times and for various
purposes during the annual Festival; and NSN's obligation to include one (1) full page
advertisement for the Festival in four (4) issues of NSN's bi-monthly magazine and one (1) full
5
Case 2:10-bk-53299 Doc 57 Filed 02/11/11 Entered 02/11/11 12:11:30 Desc Main
Document Page 6 of 11
ISC, therefore, contends that the Restructuring Agreement, Festival Agreement and Settlement
Agreement each remain separate and independent agreements, except to the extent the
Restructuring Agreement and Festival Agreement are modified by the Settlement Agreement.
18. ISC contends that the Settlement Agreement is an executory contract which ISC
19. Section 365(a) of the Bankruptcy Code states in pertinent part that:
20. "The Bankruptcy Code does not explicitly define the term 'executory contract.'
The legislative history, however, indicated that Congress intended the terms to be defined as a
contract 'on which performance remains due to some extent on both sides'." In re Pro Page
Partners, LLC, 270 B.R. 221, 226, 227 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2001) (quoting Terrell v. Albaugh (In
re Terrell), 892 F. 2d 469, 471 (6th Cir. 1989) (quoting S. Rep. No. 95-989, a 58 (1978),
1
ISC, as a debtor-in-possession, has all the rights of a trustee under the Bankruptcy Code.
See 11 U.S.C. § 1107(a).
6
Case 2:10-bk-53299 Doc 57 Filed 02/11/11 Entered 02/11/11 12:11:30 Desc Main
Document Page 7 of 11
22. ISC contends that the Restructuring Agreement, the Festival Agreement and the
Settlement Agreement are executory contracts under Terrell and/or under the Countryman
definition in that each agreement contains numerous provisions that, if remain unperformed or if
either party fails to complete performance, would constitute a material breach. These provisions
23. The decision as to whether to reject an executory contract is left to the sound
business judgment of the debtor. Lubigol Enterprises, Inc. v. Richmond Metal Finishers, Inc.,
756 F.2d 1043, 1046-47 (4th Cir. 1985); Phar-Mor, Inc. v. Strauss Building Associates, 204 B.R.
948, 954 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio, 1977); In re Level Propane Gases, Inc., 2007 WL 1821723 (N.D.
24. Under the business judgment rule, the Court should "presume that the debtor
acted prudently, on an informed basis, in good faith, and in the honest belief that the action
taken was in the best interests of the bankruptcy estate." In re Pomona Valley Med. Group, 476
F.3d 665, 670 (9th Cir. 2007) (citations omitted). The Court should thus approve the requested
rejection unless the decision is so manifestly unreasonable that it could not be based on sound
business judgment, but only on bad faith, or whim or caprice. Id. (citations omitted).
7
Case 2:10-bk-53299 Doc 57 Filed 02/11/11 Entered 02/11/11 12:11:30 Desc Main
Document Page 8 of 11
25. Here, the requested rejections are in the business judgment of the Debtor and in
the best interests of its bankruptcy estate. Under the Festival Agreement, the Debtor is required
to pay NSN eighteen percent (18%) of the gross revenue of the Festival without NSN having
any accompanying obligations and without NSN being responsible for the expenses of the
organization or production of the Festival. The continuing obligation to make this payment was
a major contributing factor in the Debtor seeking Chapter 11 relief. This continuing financial
obligation to NSN also creates a substantial hardship on ISC's ability to profitably produce the
Festival. In addition, this financial obligation is inequitable to ISC and its bankruptcy estate and
creates a material barrier to ISC's ability to reorganize. It is, therefore, in the best interests of
benefit to ISC and, in fact, harm and hinder ISC's growth and influence in the storytelling
community. From the date of the signing of these agreements, NSN has steadily declined in
size, scope, stature and influence. NSN's membership has declined from approximately 5,500
in 1998 to approximately 1,500 in 2011 while, at the same time, ISC is precluded from soliciting
members which hinders ISC's growth and fundraising abilities. NSN chose to only service its
members, but has apparently failed in its mission as membership has declined by some
seventy-five percent (75%) since NSN's inception. NSN no longer supplies all the talent for the
Festival as ISC has independent relationships with the storytellers and storytelling community.
This membership decline has occurred despite the growth of interest in the art and application
of storytelling across America and internationally and the generous funding from ISC. In other
words, NSN continues to share in the revenues of the annual Festival, but has failed in its
mission to enhance ISC through its membership and related services. It is, therefore, also in
the best interests of ISC to reject the Reorganization Agreement and Settlement Agreement.
8
Case 2:10-bk-53299 Doc 57 Filed 02/11/11 Entered 02/11/11 12:11:30 Desc Main
Document Page 9 of 11
27. ISC has and plans to continue to plan, produce and conduct and produce the
Festival, but desires to remove the burdensome and unproductive relationship with NSN in the
WHEREFORE, ISC requests that the Court grant this motion and authorize and approve
ISC's rejection of the Reorganization Agreement, the Festival Agreement and the Settlement
Agreement.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that on February 11, 2011, the (1) Motion to Reject
Executory Contracts, and (2) Proposed Order were filed electronically. All parties on the
attached Service List will receive copies of this filing. Notice of this filing will be sent by
operation of the Court's electronic filing system to all parties indicated on the electronic filing
receipt. All other parties, if any, have been served by hand delivery, overnight delivery,
facsimile transmission, or by mailing a copy of same by United States Mail, postage prepaid.
DESSAUER: I-J
INTERNATIONAL STORYTELLING CENTER
NSA.86822
9
Case 2:10-bk-53299 Doc 57 Filed 02/11/11 Entered 02/11/11 12:11:30 Desc Main
Document Page 10 of 11
SERVICE LIST
10
Case 2:10-bk-53299 Doc 57 Filed 02/11/11 Entered 02/11/11 12:11:30 Desc Main
Document Page 11 of 11
11