Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Sponsored by
About This Research Report
The following report provides an analysis of the 2010 SHRM Employee Benefits Survey results.
In February 2010, the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) conducted its annual
survey to gather information on the types of benefits employers offer to their employees. The
survey instrument listed 279 benefits and asked human resource (HR) professionals to indicate
whether they offered these benefits. If they offered a benefit, then they were asked whether their
organization planned to reduce or eliminate the benefit in 2010. If the HR professional reported
that his or her organization did not offer the benefit, the respondent was asked if there were plans
to offer the benefit in the next year.
About SHRM
The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) is the world’s largest association
devoted to human resource management. Representing more than 250,000 members in over 140
countries, the Society serves the needs of HR professionals and advances the interests of the
HR profession. Founded in 1948, SHRM has more than 575 affiliated chapters within the United
States and subsidiary offices in China and India. Visit SHRM Online at www.shrm.org.
India
SHRM India
702, 7th Floor
Raheja Towers
Plot C- 62, G Block
Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E)
Mumbai 400051
Maharashtra
Tel: +91-22-42472000
Fax: +91-22-42472010
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 1
Contents
2 Executive Summary: Employee Benefits in a Post-Recession Economy
5 Survey Results
5 Employee Benefits: A Key Organizational Investment
7 Health Care and Welfare
15 Preventive Health and Wellness
18 Retirement Savings and Planning Benefits
21 Financial and Compensation Benefits
26 Paid Leave Benefits
30 Family-Friendly Benefits
33 Flexible Working Benefits
38 Personal Services Benefits
41 Housing and Relocation Benefits
43 Business Travel Benefits
45 Other Benefits
47 Conclusions
48 Methodology
48 Notations
51 Appendix
51 Benefits by Organization Staff Size and Organization Sector
73 Prevalence of Benefits
76 Benefits Index
82 Endnotes
Special Sections
10 Costs of Health Care Coverage to Companies
35 Providing Employees With More Freedom
36 Telework Programs: Executive Summary of SHRM Foundation-Funded Research
2 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
xx Review and ask for employee feedback: An orga- majority of HR professionals in this study reported
nization’s benefits program should be reviewed and that their organizations reviewed their benefits
assessed not only to monitor associated costs and programs at least once a year. Benchmarking tools,
value but also to evaluate the competitiveness of benefits needs assessments and employee surveys
the program. A well-designed employee program is are great tools HR professionals can use to help
based on employee needs and supports an organi- their organizations customize benefits programs to
zation’s ability to attract and retain employees. The meet their needs and to remain competitive.
4 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
Our Vision
Colonial Life will be the company of choice for
voluntary benefits programs offered through the
workplace.
Our Mission
Colonial Life is committed to helping working
Americans understand and appreciate the benefits
available to them through the workplace and select
the benefits they need to protect their families and
lifestyles.
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 5
Figure 1 To What Extent Have Organizations Been Figure 2 To What Extent Have Benefits Offerings
Negatively Affected by the Economic Been Negatively Affected by the Economic
Recession? Recession?
66% 63%
29% 28%
9%
5%
To a large extent To some extent To no extent To a large extent To some extent To no extent
(n = 522) (n = 519)
Note: Excludes respondents who answered “not sure.” Note: Excludes respondents who answered “not sure.”
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010) Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
6 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
Table 1 Average Percentage of Payroll Reflecting Total Cost of Benefits (by Organization Staff Size)
Overall Small Medium Large Differences
(1–99 Employees) (100–499 Employees) (500 or More Employees) Based
on Staff Size*
Mandatory benefits 19% 18% 19% 19%
Voluntary benefits 18% 15% 19% 21% Large > small
Pay for time not 11% 11% 11% 10%
worked benefits
(n = 383)
* Indicates a significant difference based on staff size. Blank cells in the last column indicate that no statistically significant differences were found.
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
79%
10% 7%
1% 2%
More than once a year Once a year/annually Once every two years Never Other
(n = 534)
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 7
Table A-1 Health Care and Welfare Benefits (continued from page 7)
Offer the Offer the benefit but have plans to reduce or Do not offer the benefit but have plans to
benefit eliminate the benefit within the next 12 months do so within the next 12 months
In-vitro fertilization coverage 25% 6% *
Retiree health care coverage 25% 12% 1%
Critical illness insuranceG 21% 4% 1%
Point of service (POS) plan 21% 8% 1%
Intensive care insuranceH 19% 7% *
Hospital indemnity insurance 19% 5% *
Laser-based vision correction coverage 19% 6% *
Wholesale generic drug program for injectable drugs 18% 11% 1%
Grief recovery program 17% 8% *
Support groups 17% 3% *
Consumer-directed health care plan (CDHP) 16% 4% 3%
Pharmacy management programI 15% 3% 1%
Alternative/complementary medical coverage 14% 1% 1%
Health savings account (HSA)K 11% 0% 0%
Exclusive provider organization (EPO) 9% 0% 1%
Indemnity plan (fee-for-service) 8% 9% *
Elective procedures coverageJ 7% 0% *
Employer-matched contributions to health savings accountK 7% 0% 0%
Health reimbursement account (HRA)K 6% 0% 0%
Experimental/elective drug coverage 3% 0% *
Subsidized cost of elder care 3% 0% *
Gender reassignment surgery coverage 2% 0% *
(n = 534)
* Less than 1%.
A Does not pertain to employee-paid supplemental insurance.
B Does not pertain to employee-paid supplemental insurance.
C IRC Section 125, for all expenses.
D Does not pertain to employee-paid supplemental insurance.
E IRC Section 125 Cafeteria Plan allowing for premium conversion.
F Health care coverage for a spouse is offered as a benefit to employees, but there is a surcharge added to the employee premium cost.
H Provides funds to help cover the extra expenses for accidents or illnesses that result in an admission to a hospital intensive care unit.
G Provides funds to help cover extra expenses upon diagnosis of a critical illness or condition.
I Independent of medical plan management.
J Any non-emergency surgical procedure other than laser-based vision correction coverage.
K These benefits were examined based on companies that indicated they offered consumer-directed health care plans (CDHP).
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 9
CDHPs involve a high-deductible insurance plan society continue to change, companies are expanding
combined with a health care spending account from the relationships that are qualified for certain
Medical flexible
which unreimbursed health care costs are paid. benefits. Dependents who were offered health care spending
This plan can be attractive in that the premiums coverage included dependent grandchildren (39%), accounts allow
are typically lower for both the employer and the domestic partners (38% of organizations offered employees
employee. Sixteen percent of companies reported opposite-sex domestic partner health care coverage to deduct
offering this type of plan. and 37% offered same-sex domestic partner coverage) pretax
and foster children (37%).
Nine percent of organizations offered an EPO plan. dollars
This plan is thought of as being more restrictive Women’s Health from their
because employees must use providers from a specific
Some organizations offer health care and wellness paychecks to
network of hospitals and physicians.
benefits that focus on childbearing and fertility. The pay for health
Indemnity, or fee-for-service, plans are thought of most commonly offered benefit was contraceptive care services,
as more traditional health care plans, which charge coverage (68%). In addition, 30% of organizations such as co-
employees for each individual service and allow them covered infertility treatment (other than in-vitro payments,
complete choice in which providers they see. Only fertilization), and 25% specifically offered in-vitro
insurance
8% of organizations reported offering this type of fertilization coverage.
plan.
deductibles
Health Savings Accounts and vision
Six percent of organizations offered health
Health savings accounts (HSAs) were created and dental
reimbursement accounts—health care spending
accounts set up by the employer for the employee.
by the Medicare bill in 2003 and are designed expenses.
to help individuals save on a tax-free basis for
The employer makes contributions for the employee
future qualified medical and retiree health care
to use for health care services. It is similar to a
costs. Eleven percent of companies provided these
flexible spending account, except that the funds roll
accounts. Contributions to HSA accounts can be
over from year to year, allowing the employee to
made by the employer, the employee or both. Seven
accumulate funds over time.
percent of organizations matched contributions made
The vast majority of companies (94%) offered to these accounts.
dental insurance to employees, and more than
three-quarters (77%) offered vision insurance. Flexible Spending Accounts
These programs may be either part of or in addition Medical flexible spending accounts allow employees
to other health insurance plans. Other forms of to deduct pretax dollars from their paychecks to
insurance offered by respondents’ organizations pay for health care services, such as co-payments,
included accidental death and dismemberment insurance deductibles and vision and dental
insurance (82%), chiropractic coverage (85%), expenses. These accounts offer companies a way
mental health coverage (82%), supplemental accident to help employees manage their health care costs.
insurance (44%), cancer insurance (31%), long-term The maximum amount each eligible employee
care insurance (31%), critical illness insurance (21%), may contribute to these accounts is determined
hospital indemnity insurance (19%) and intensive by the employer. Almost three-quarters (72%) of
care insurance (19%). organizations offered medical flexible spending
accounts (Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section
Health Care for Dependents 125, for all expenses), and 43% reported offering
Some health care and welfare benefits are intended health care premium flexible spending accounts
to help employees manage the costs associated with (IRC Section 125 Cafeteria Plan allowing for
caring for a dependent. As family structures in our premium conversion).
10 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
The cost of health care coverage is a major Revenue per FTE also has an impact on the
financial issue for employers, and there are average health care costs. Revenue per FTE
differences in the costs organizations pay is a metric that is often used to measure
annually per employee depending on the productivity. Companies with higher revenue per
organization staff size and factors such as FTE, above $155,556, spend $8,068 on health
revenue per FTE. Overall, the average cost care costs per employee. This is significantly
for health care per employee is $7,038, higher than companies with revenue per FTE
according to the 2009 SHRM Health Care below $155,556, which spend $5,629.
Benchmarking Database. Larger organizations More detailed information on this topic can
spend $8,026 per employee compared with be found through SHRM’s Customized
$6,706 and $6,775 for small- and medium-sized Benchmarking Service at www.shrm.org
organizations. /benchmarks.
Average Health Care Cost per Employee Average Health Care Cost per Employee
(by Organization Staff Size) (by Revenue per FTE)
Overall $7,038 Revenue per FTE Revenue per FTE
Above $155,556 Below $155,556
Small (1–99 employees) $6,706
Mean Mean
Medium (100–499 employees) $6,775
Cost per employee $5,629 $8,068
Large (500 or more employees) $8,026 Source: SHRM Health Care Benchmarking Database (2009)
Source: SHRM Health Care Benchmarking Database (2009)
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 11
Table A-2 Health Care and Welfare Benefits (by Year) (continued from page 12)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Differences between Differences between
2006 and 2010* 2009 and 2010*
In-vitro fertilization coverage 28% 27% 26% 23% 25%
Retiree health care coverage 29% 35% 32% 26% 25%
Critical illness insuranceA — — — — 21%
Point of service (POS) plan — — 26% 26% 21%
Intensive care insurance B
— — — — 19%
Hospital indemnity insurance 29% 27% 25% 23% 19%
Laser-based vision correction coverage — — — 19% 19%
Wholesale generic drug program for injectable drugs 23% 30% 24% 17% 18%
Grief recovery program 18% 15% 16% 15% 17%
Support groups 12% 11% 12% 12% 17%
Consumer-directed health care plan (CDHP) 17% 19% 12% 12% 16%
Pharmacy management program 15% 19% 17% 18% 15%
Alternative/complementary medical coverage 20% 19% 18% 16% 14%
Health savings account (HSA)C 9% 12% 8% 9% 11%
Exclusive provider organization (EPO) 9% 11% 9% 8% 9%
Indemnity plan 15% 18% 12% 7% 8%
Elective procedures coverage — — — 5% 7%
Employer-matched contributions to health savings accountC 4% 6% 5% 6% 7%
Health reimbursement account (HRA)C 8% 9% 5% 6% 6%
Experimental/elective drug coverage 4% 6% 5% 3% 3%
Subsidized cost of elder care — — 4% 3% 3%
Gender reassignment surgery coverage — — — 1% 2%
Critical illness insuranceA 39% 38% 37% 34% —
Intensive care insurance B
39% 40% 38% 35% —
* Indicates a significant change from 2009 to 2010 or from 2006 to 2010. Blank cells in the last two columns indicate that no statistically significant differences were found.
A Starting in 2010, “critical illness insurance” was changed to “critical illness (provides funds to help cover extra expenses upon diagnosis of a critical illness or condition).” This change accounts for much
of the drop starting in 2010.
B Starting in 2010, “intensive care insurance” was changed to “intensive care insurance (provides funds to help cover the extra expenses for accidents or illnesses that result in an admission to a hospital
intensive care unit).” This change accounts for much of the drop starting in 2010.
C These benefits were examined based on companies that indicated they offered consumer-directed health care plans (CDHP).
Note: A dash (—) indicates that this particular benefit was not asked about or was combined with another benefit.
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
14 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
Expert Q & A
Mike Aitken
Director, Government Affairs, SHRM
Q: What do you think will be the most immediate impact effective as a public option in creating competition within
of the health care legislation for HR professionals? states. There are a number of different views, and HR pro-
fessionals will need to look at their plans to see how they
A: Right away, employers and HR professionals will need stack up.
to take a close look at their health care design, speak to
their counsel and consider how these changes will influ- Q: Will wellness-related incentives for lifestyle choices by
ence their business down the line. In particular, employers employees have a big impact?
that have early open enrollment periods will need to consid-
er very soon what these changes mean for their health care
A: The bill appears to do a fairly good job in incentivizing
wellness programs. Some employers that have not up to
benefits plans. For example, there is a new statute that says
this point taken advantage of the cost savings that wellness
that dependents up to the age of 26 will be able to obtain
programs produce will probably want to take a new look at
coverage under their parents’ insurance, and with so many
what these kinds of programs can offer them.
people under 30 lacking health insurance, this component
alone could have big implications.
Q: Consumer-directed health care has been growing
in the United States. How will the new law affect efforts
There is going to be an increased role for HR throughout
to put workers in control of their health choices and
this process, in both educating other members of their or-
expenditures?
ganizational leadership team and answering the questions
of employees. This means there will be a strong communi- A: One of our issues had been the need for greater trans-
cations responsibility for HR in educating employees and parency and more information on health outcomes. Part of
managing expectations. the recovery act enacted in 2009 provided infrastructure
for health IT network. Though we think the Patient Pro-
Q: What effect do you think the law will have on the tection and Affordable Care Act did not go far enough in
way U.S. HR professionals do their jobs and on the encouraging these kinds of cost savings, it did take positive
profession itself? steps that lay the groundwork for consumers to be more
actively engaged in understanding their costs and choices
A: Because it is going to be phased in over the number of
in the years ahead.
years, this law will be a focus for HR from a tactical stand-
point for years to come. From a strategic standpoint, HR
Q: How will the new law affect the relationship between
professionals will need to consider various future scenarios
employer and employee over time? Between government
they can envision in their organization as a result of taking
and the business world?
any different approaches to managing health care benefits.
A: The bill maintains the blend of employer- and public-
Q: What impact might the new law have on companies’ based system that existed before, and this is what it will
ability to help limit health care expenditures? remain after. There are some who think there will be more
government interference in some areas of health insurance,
A: One of the concerns we had during the development
but for employers that want to continue to provide the kinds
of the legislation was that it did not do enough to control
of benefits they have been providing for years, it may not
costs. There were not a lot of provisions for dealing with
make such a big difference. Overall, the jury is still out, and
medical malpractice reform, for example. Many HR profes-
we probably won’t be able to evaluate the full extent of the
sionals remain concerned that it does not do enough to
bill’s impact on business and society for another decade
bend the “cost curve” for employers and employees. Others
or so.
think that the health insurance cooperatives will not be as
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 15
any aspect of any company-held plan included these Preventive Health and 75% of
particular benefits. Wellness Incentives
companies
As the costs of health care continue to spiral upward, More than one-quarter (28%) of organizations
provided
employees and employers are searching for ways to offered rewards or bonuses for achieving or
completing certain health and wellness activities.
wellness
keep these costs under control and as manageable
as possible. Preventive health and wellness benefits Some organizations offer health care discounts resources
are designed to help maintain or change employees’ to employees for participating in health-related and
behavior in order to achieve better health and assessments or programs. Twelve percent of information,
decrease the associated health risks. By preventing organizations provided health care premium and 59% of
discounts for getting an annual health risk
or lessening the incidence of health conditions, organizations
the companies hope to save on long-term health assessment, 11% provided a discount for not
using tobacco products, 9% offered discounts for
offered
costs. Three-quarters (75%) of companies provided
wellness resources and information, and 59% of participating in a wellness program, and 4% provided wellness
organizations offered wellness programs. health care premium discounts for participating in a programs.
weight-loss program.
Preventable and Chronic Conditions
Obesity is a growing health concern in the United
Preventive Health and
States. There are many health problems associated
Wellness Resources
with excess weight and other types of preventable Preventive health and wellness resources help make
and chronic conditions. These conditions affect employees aware of wellness issues while providing
the health and well-being of employees and also them with important tools to live a healthy lifestyle.
have a significant economic impact on businesses. Forty-two percent of companies offered health fairs,
According to the U.S. Department of Health and and 41% had a wellness newsletter/column.
Human Services, obesity alone costs U.S. companies
an estimated $13 billion per year.3 Organizations Other Preventive Health
are attempting to combat these issues with subsidies and Wellness Benefits
or reimbursements for fitness center memberships Other types of preventive health and wellness
(33%), health and lifestyle coaching (33%), weight- benefits offered by organizations included 24-hour
loss programs (30%), on-site fitness centers (21%), nurse line (56%), CPR/first aid training (55%)
nutritional counseling (18%), on-site fitness classes and an on-site blood pressure machine (20%). In
(14%) and fitness equipment subsidy/reimbursement addition, 12% of offered massage therapy services
(5%). Other benefits that encourage a healthy for employees at the office. Massage therapy can
lifestyle included smoking cessation programs (39%) be a great health maintenance tool that aids in
and stress reduction programs (10%). stress reduction. This may be especially beneficial
for employees who work in a very stressful work
Other benefits organizations offered to help
environment. Less commonly offered benefits
employees deal with preventable and chronic
included on-site sick rooms (12%), medical clinics
conditions included on-site vaccinations (68% offered
(10%) and nap rooms (5%).
seasonal flu vaccinations and 35% offered H1N1
flu vaccinations), health screening programs for Preventive Health and Wellness
conditions such as high glucose or high cholesterol Benefits Over the Past Five Years
levels (43%) and preventive programs specifically
Table B-2 shows the percentages of organizations
targeting employees with chronic health conditions
that offered specific preventive health and wellness
(33%).
benefits from 2006 through 2010. There were no
significant changes in these benefits from 2009
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 17
to 2010. A stress-reduction program was the only and wellness benefits. There was some variation by
preventive health and wellness benefit offered by sector in the likelihood of providing these benefits.
more companies in 2006 than in 2010. Privately owned for-profit organizations were less
likely to offer a number of preventive health and
Preventive Health and Wellness wellness benefits. All results by organization staff
Benefits by Organization Staff size and organization sector are displayed in the
Size and Organization Sector appendix.
Again, larger organizations were more likely than
smaller organizations to offer many preventive health
Retirement and Financial Planning In defined contribution plans, the employer states
that it will contribute a fixed amount, or no amount,
Many companies offer retirement plans to help
to the employee’s individual account. The employee
employees plan for their financial future. Ninety-
bears the investment risk in these plans since the
seven percent of companies offered at least one
value of the account’s investments may decrease over
time. Nearly three-quarters (72%) of organizations tax elective deferral basis. For 2010, an employee can
provided an employer match on some or all of the contribute $16,500 (plus an additional $5,500 if an
employee’s contributions, and 69% of organizations employee is 50 or older). Cash balance pension plans
offered defined contribution plan loans. These (offered by 9% of organizations) are technically a
loans allow participants to borrow from their type of defined benefit plan, though they look like a
retirement savings. In addition, 39% of organizations defined contribution plan in that employees have and
automatically enrolled employees into their defined can see their individual account balances.
contribution plans unless employees actively opted
Six percent reported offering a phased retirement
out, 18% provided automatic escalation of salary
program (a reduced schedule and/or responsibilities
deferral amounts for defined contribution plans, and
prior to full retirement), offering older workers a
1% offered 401(k) debit cards.
way to ease into retirement while passing along
Defined benefit pension plans, as their name institutional knowledge to others.
suggests, differ from defined contribution plans in
Organizations also offered financial planning
that the employer promises to pay a certain benefit
benefits such as individual investment advice (40%)
upon the employee’s retirement. The benefit amount
and retirement planning services (39%). While these
is calculated based on factors such as age, earnings
programs do not directly contribute to employees’
and length of service. Employers bear the investment
retirement savings, they can help employees plan for
risk in these plans since they are required to pay the
a financially sound retirement as well as other major
promised benefit regardless of the plan’s investment
life goals.
performance. The Roth 401(k) is a retirement
savings plan that combines some aspects of both the
401(k) and the Roth IRA. Under the Roth 401(k),
employees can decide to contribute funds on a post-
advances, and 9% offered check-cashing services 7% offered parking subsidies and 49% reported
on site. providing automobile allowance/expenses. Roughly
one out of 10 organizations (12%) offered qualified
Insurance transportation spending accounts, a specific type
Eighty-seven percent of organizations offered life of flexible spending account that deducts a portion
insurance to employees, 58% offered life insurance of an employee’s pretax earnings to an account
for dependents, 25% offered accelerated death that reimburses the employee for transportation
benefits for financial assistance in the case of a expenses such as tolls, transit passes and parking
terminal illness, and 24% offered accident insurance fees. The Census Bureau also reports that 12%
(separate from travel accident insurance). of employees carpool to work and 5% take public
transportation.6 According to the survey results,
Commuter Benefits some organizations offered benefits to encourage
Some organizations offer benefits to offset the these employees by providing transit subsidies (11%)
costs employees incur in commuting to and from or carpooling subsidies (5%). These benefits help
the office. The U.S. Census Bureau estimates that reduce the number of vehicles on the road and the
88% of U.S. workers drive to work.5 A vast majority environmental impact of commuting; they may also
(90%) of organizations offered on-site parking, help lower stress levels of employees who would
Table D-1 Financial and Compensation Benefits (continued from page 21)
Offer the Offer the benefit but have plans to reduce or Do not offer the benefit but have plans
benefit eliminate the benefit within the next 12 months to do so within the next 12 months
Scholarships for members of employees’ families 17% 9% 0%
Credit counseling service 16% 7% *
Sign-on bonus (nonexecutive) 16% 14% *
Retention bonus (executive) 14% 7% *
Qualified transportation spending account 12% 5% *
Stock purchase plan 12% 14% *
Retention bonus (nonexecutive) 11% 5% 1%
Transit subsidy 11% 7% *
Auto insurance program 10% 6% 1%
Incentive stock options (ISOs) 10% 8% *
On-site check cashing 9% 9% 0%
Loans for employees to purchase personal computers 7% 15% *
Low-/no-interest loans to employees for non-emergency 7% 8% *
situations
Parking subsidy 7% 8% *
Non-qualified stock options (NQSOs or NSOs) 6% 6% 0%
Carpooling subsidy 5% 0% *
Free computers to employees for personal use 5% 0% 0%
Educational loans for members of employees’ families 3% 14% 0%
Free or discounted home Internet service 3% 0% 0%
Personal tax services 2% 0% 0%ª
(n = 534)
* Less than 1%.
A Does not pertain to employee-paid supplemental insurance.
B Ability to select from a variety of benefits.
C Unscheduled bonus for good performance.
D For terminal illnesses.
E Separate from travel accident insurance.
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 23
otherwise spend a large amount of time in traffic the most effective recruiting strategies available to
during their daily commutes. The financial effects companies.
17% of
of rising gas prices may make transit and carpooling organizations
More than one-quarter (26%) of organizations provided
subsidies even more valued benefits in the future.7
offered sign-on bonuses to executive-level employees,
educational
Finally, 23% offered company-owned vehicles for and 16% offered these bonuses to nonexecutive
employee use, and 10% offered an auto insurance employees. Sign-on bonuses are bonuses provided
assistance to
program to employees. to employees when they agree to join the company. members of
A sign-on bonus usually must be returned if the employees’
Educational Assistance employee leaves the organization within a certain families in
Some companies provided educational assistance to time frame, and therefore it helps both recruitment the form of
the dependents of their employees. As with career and retention.
scholarships.
development benefits, educational assistance not only
In addition, 14% of companies offered specific
helps the employee but also benefits the employer by
retention bonuses to executive-level employees, and
developing a more educated workforce. Almost two-
11% offered them to nonexecutive employees. These
thirds of companies (62%) offered undergraduate
bonuses usually reward an employee for agreeing to
educational assistance, and 56% offered graduate
stay with the company through a particular project
educational assistance. A recent SHRM study
or period of time. Finally, 30% offered spot bonuses,
revealed that the maximum reimbursement allowed
or unscheduled bonuses for exceptional performance.
for tuition/education expenses is on average $3,467.8
that help employees manage the associated costs. insurance (24% in 2010 compared with 16% in
According to the survey respondents, these benefits 2009).
Employee
included employee computer purchase assistance or referral
Over the last five years, there were several decreases
discounts (26%), loans for employees to purchase bonus and
in the number of organizations offering financial
personal computers (7%), free computers for personal
and compensation benefits. The following benefits
spot bonus
use (5%) and free or discounted Internet service were the only
were offered by fewer organizations in 2010 than in
(3%).
2006: accelerated death benefits, accident insurance, financial and
Other Financial and automobile allowances for business use of personal compensation
Compensation Benefits vehicles, company-owned car for employee use, benefits
credit union, graduate educational assistance, offered
Other financial benefits organizations provided were
employee computer purchase discounts, matching
employee discounts on company services (38%), by fewer
charitable contributions, sign-on bonuses (executive)
donation for participating in charitable events (34%),
and spot bonuses. Compared with 2006, business
organizations
full flexible benefits plans (30%), matching charitable
cell phone or handheld device for personal use was in 2010
contributions (23%) and credit counseling services
offered by more organizations in 2010. compared
(16%).
with 2009.
Financial and Compensation
Financial and Compensation
Benefits by Organization Staff
Benefits Over the Past Five Years
Size and Organization Sector
Table D-2 shows the percentages of organizations
Large and medium-sized organizations were most
that offered financial and compensation benefits
likely to offer many financial and compensation
from 2006 through 2010. Employee referral
benefits. Overall, publicly owned for-profit
bonus and spot bonus were the only financial and
organizations were significantly more likely to offer
compensation benefits offered by fewer organizations
these benefits.
in 2010 compared with 2009. The only benefit
that significantly increased from 2009 was accident
Table D-2 Financial and Compensation Benefits (by Year) (continued from page 24)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Differences between Differences between 2009
2006 and 2010* and 2010*
Spot bonus 41% 40% 38% 38% 30%
Financial planning services — — — 28% 28%
Employee computer purchase discounts (not a loan) 37% 35% 33% 29% 26%
Sign-on bonus (executive) 34% 30% 31% 27% 26%
Accelerated death benefits 34% 30% 22% 23% 25%
Accident insurance 37% 23% 18% 16% 24%
Company-owned car for employee use 31% 28% 25% 27% 23%
Matching charitable contributions 31% 27% 25% 19% 23%
Payroll advances — — — 18% 19%
Loans to employees for emergency/disaster assistance — 24% 19% 19% 18%
Scholarships for members of employees’ families 19% 20% 20% 17% 17%
Credit counseling service — — 13% 10% 16%
Sign-on bonus (nonexecutive) 24% 24% 24% 21% 16%
Retention bonus (executive) 16% 17% 17% 11% 14%
Qualified transportation spending account 18% 11% 15% 13% 12%
Stock purchase plan 20% 16% 19% 15% 12%
Retention bonus (nonexecutive) 10% 13% 14% 10% 11%
Transit subsidy 13% 16% 13% 13% 11%
Auto insurance program 14% 13% 15% 14% 10%
Incentive stock options (ISOs)A — — — — 10%
On-site check cashing 10% 11% 11% 8% 9%
Loans for employees to purchase personal computer 7% 8% 6% 5% 7%
Low-/no-interest loans to employees for non-emergency — 7% 9% 10% 7%
situations
Parking subsidy 10% 12% 11% 10% 7%
Non-qualified stock options (NQSOs or NSOs)A — — — — 6%
Carpooling subsidy 7% 8% 5% 6% 5%
Free computer to employees for personal use 7% 5% 6% 5% 5%
Educational loans for members of employees’ families 6% 5% 3% 2% 3%
Free or discounted home Internet service 11% 11% 9% 6% 3%
Personal tax services 3% 5% 3% 3% 2%
Stock optionsA 26% 24% 19% 16% —
* Indicates a significant change from 2009 to 2010 or from 2006 to 2010. Blank cells in the last two columns indicate that no statistically significant differences were found.
A Starting in 2010, “stock options” was separated into “incentive stock options” and “non-qualified stock options.”
Note: A dash (—) indicates that this particular benefit was not asked about or was combined with another benefit.
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
26 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
this leave, the employee retains his or her benefits. Other Leave Benefits
Some states have additional FMLA requirements.
Other types of leave offered by companies included
Federal law does not require FMLA leave to be
paid time off to serve on the board of a community
paid, but 24% of organizations did offer paid family
group or professional association (20%), paid
leave. Twenty percent of organizations offered family
time off for volunteering (17%), unpaid sabbatical
leave above the federal FMLA requirements, and
programs (16%), a paid day off for the employee’s
19% offered family leave above the state FMLA
birthday (10%), emergency flexibility (fixed number
requirements. In addition, 17% reported offering
of days off with pay for emergencies) (7%), paid
parental leave above federal and state FMLA
sabbatical programs (4%) and company-paid time off
requirements, and 11% reported offering elder care
for group vacations (1%).
leave above federal and state FMLA requirements.
Information about the FMLA can be found at Paid Leave Benefits Over
www.dol.gov/esa/whd/fmla. the Past Five Years
Military Leave Table E-2 shows the percentages of companies
offering these paid leave benefits from 2006 through
As the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan continue,
2010. There were no significant changes in these
some companies are forced to deal with employees
benefits from 2009 to 2010. Paid military leave
who are away from the office on active duty. Twenty-
was the only paid leave benefit offered by fewer
two percent offered paid military leave beyond what
companies in 2010 than in 2006 (22% in 2010
may be required by law (a small number of states
compared with 31% in 2006).
have paid military leave requirements).
Paid Leave Benefits by Organization
Leave for New Parents Staff Size and Organization Sector
There are also some paid leave benefits available to
Overall, larger organizations were significantly
new parents. Seventeen percent of organizations
more likely to offer paid leave benefits. There were
offered both paid maternity leave (other than what
no significant differences in these benefits by profit
is covered by short-term disability or state law) and
status. Governmental organizations were more likely
paid paternity leave. In addition, 16% offered paid
to offer many of these benefits.
adoption leave.
All results by organization staff size and sector are
displayed in the appendix.
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 29
Family-Friendly Benefits
Table F-1 lists various family-friendly benefits and (3) the percentage of those that did not offer the
(1) the percentage of human resource professionals benefit but had plans to do so within the next 12
who indicated that their organization offered months. To get a complete picture of benefits and
each benefit; (2) the percentage of organizations coverage, respondents indicated whether any aspect
that offered the benefit but had plans to reduce of any company-held plan included these particular
or eliminate it within the next 12 months; and benefits.11
The following benefits decreased from 2006 to more accommodating in this situation. It is also
2010: adoption assistance, elder care referral service possible that because large organizations were more
and foster care assistance. Compared with 2006, the likely than small ones to offer child care and access
ability to bring a child to work in an emergency was to backup child care services, employees at large
offered by more organizations in 2010. organizations were able to utilize these options
instead.
Family-Friendly Benefits by
Organization Staff Size and Publicly owned for-profit and governmental
Organization Sector organizations were somewhat more likely to indicate
their organizations offered family-friendly benefits.
Large organizations were most likely to offer many
family-friendly benefits. The only exception was a
policy of bringing a child to work in an emergency,
which was more likely to be offered by small (38%)
and medium (31%) organizations than by large
(21%) ones. It is possible that smaller organizations
might be less formal and are therefore able to be
time basis and 17% on a full-time basis. More than breaks. Thirty-nine percent offered mealtime flex,
one-third (34%) of organizations offered compressed which allows employees to make up time at some 55% of
workweeks, where full-time employees are allowed point during the day as a result of a longer meal organizations
to work longer days for part of a week or pay period break or to leave early as a result of a shorter meal offered some
in exchange for shorter days or a day off during break.
that week or pay period. Thirteen percent offered
form of
job sharing, in which two employees share the Other Flexible Working Benefits telecommuting:
responsibilities, accountability and compensation of Other types of flexible working benefits offered by 44% of
one full-time job. These types of flexible scheduling companies included seasonal scheduling (17%) and respondents
benefits allow organizations to recruit and retain alternating location arrangements (4% ), allowing reported that their
motivated workers who may not be able or willing to employees to work part of the year in one location organizations
work a traditional nine-to-five schedule. and the rest of the year in another location (e.g., offered
snowbird employees—those who move from colder
Nineteen percent of organizations offered shift telecommuting
climates to warmer climates in the winter).
flexibility, where employees are allowed to coordinate on an ad-hoc
with co-workers to adjust their schedules by trading, basis, 34% on a
Flexible Working Benefits
dropping or picking up shifts. One percent of
Over the Past Five Years part-time basis
organizations had a results-only work environment
(ROWE), allowing employees to work wherever and Table G-2 shows the percentages of organizations and 17% on a
whenever they wish as long as projects are completed that offered flexible working benefits from 2006 full-time basis.
on a timely basis. through 2010. There were no significant changes in
these benefits from 2009 to 2010.
Casual Dress The only significant decrease from 2006 was the
More than one-half (57%) of companies offered percentage of companies that offered flextime
casual dress at least once a week, 34% allowed (57% in 2006 compared with 49% in 2010).
casual dress every day, and 23% allowed seasonal Telecommuting on a part-time basis was the
casual dress, which allows casual dress for extended only flexible working benefit offered by more
periods during the year. While many companies may organizations in 2010 than in 2006.
consider casual dress part of their organizational
culture as opposed to an employee benefit, Flexible Working Benefits
employees appreciate the opportunity to wear more by Organization Staff Size
comfortable clothes. and Organization Sector
Larger organizations were significantly more likely
Break Arrangements than smaller organizations to offer many of these
Some organizations offer a variety of benefits benefits, as were governmental organizations
designed to provide employees more flexibility in compared with other sectors. All results by
deciding when they can take breaks. Forty-three organization staff size and sector are displayed in the
percent provided break arrangements that allow appendix.
employees who generally can only take assigned
breaks with more flexibility over when they take
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 35
Results-only work environment (ROWE), a management workplace practices such as ROWE and telecommuting that
strategy that evaluates employees on results instead of allow America’s workforce to meet the demands of their jobs
attendance, was co-founded by two HR professionals at without sacrificing the needs of their families. SHRM supports
Best Buy—Cali Ressler and Jody Thompson. The transition voluntary policies that assist employees in balancing the
to ROWE at Best Buy resulted in decreased voluntary demands of work and family life. Last year, in a letter to all U.S.
turnover, increased productivity and improved employee Senators and Representatives, SHRM President and CEO
engagement. The success of ROWE at Bust Buy has led other Laurence O’Neil announced that the Society is committed to
organizations such as Gap Outlet and Office of Personnel leading all stakeholders in the debate over the 21st century
Management to adopt the ROWE model for their employees. workplace flexibility policy that meets the needs of both
employees and employers.
On March 31, 2010, the Obama Administration at the Forum
on Workplace Flexibility discussed the importance of flexible
36 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
Telework Programs
Executive Summary of SHRM Foundation-Funded Research
Key Findings and Implications xx Individuals who prefer to integrate work and
for Practice nonwork lives experience higher levels of work/
Work performance increased as employees family balance when they telework more often.
teleworked for greater time periods. Telework These findings suggest that managers should
resulted in poorer performance only when the encourage integration of work and nonwork life
employee was working in a home environment among employees who telecommute frequently,
with many distractions and interruptions. perhaps by providing employees with training on
how to fully integrate work and family roles.
xx Managers should be open to a telework
arrangement because it has the potential to SHRM Foundation Grant
increase employee performance. This research was funded by a grant from the
xx Managers should counsel employees about SHRM Foundation. The SHRM Foundation is
appropriate environments at home that will a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizational affiliate of
limit distractions and interruptions, so that both the Society for Human Resource Management
employees and organizations will reap the (SHRM). Founded in 1966, the SHRM
benefits of this work arrangement. Foundation maximizes the impact of the HR
xx The employees who teleworked more reported
profession on organizational decision-making and
better work-to-family facilitation, such that performance by promoting innovation, education,
employees’ engagement in telework was research and the use of research-based
shown to yield positive outcomes in their family knowledge. The SHRM Foundation is governed
life. However, work/family balance was not the by a volunteer board of directors comprising
mechanism through which telework positively distinguished HR academic and practice leaders.
affected performance. Contributions to the SHRM Foundation are tax-
deductible. Online at www.shrm.org/foundation.
xx Managers who see employees struggling with
work/family conflict might suggest telework as
an option to lessen the conflict. Individuals vary
in the extent to which they prefer to integrate
their work and nonwork roles. The study
showed that such preferences influence the
impact of telework on the work/family balance.
xx Individuals who prefer to keep work and
nonwork lives separate experience more
work/family balance when they telework less
frequently.
38 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
prepared take-home meals), going to the post office Other Personal Services Benefits
(19% offered postal services) or going to the dry
Almost a quarter (22%) of companies offered
cleaner (7% offered dry-cleaning services).
organization-sponsored sports teams. In addition to
In addition, 20% had on-site ATMs, and 1% physical exercise and health benefits, sports teams
provided on-site haircuts. Other benefits, such as offer employees a chance to socialize and build
legal assistance or services (20%), travel planning rapport outside of their work environment.
services (10%) and concierge services (2%), help
Other types of personal services offered by
employees in more specific circumstances.
organizations included executive club memberships
(19%), employer-sponsored personal shopping
Uniform Benefits
discounts (9%), pet health insurance (4%) and self-
Some employees are required to wear certain attire defense training (3%).
while working, and employers may offer assistance
in paying for it. Almost one-third of organizations Personal Services Benefits
(30%) offered free or discounted uniforms to Over the Past Five Years
employees.
Table H-2 shows the percentages of companies that
offered personal services benefits from 2006 through
Language Skills
2010. There were no significant changes in these
Some companies offer English as a second language benefits from 2009 to 2010.
(ESL) classes to workers looking to improve their
English language skills; 8% of organizations offered Only two benefits were offered by fewer
this benefit. organizations in 2010 than in 2006: executive club
memberships (28% in 2006 compared with 19% in
An increasingly diverse workforce and the 2010) and travel planning services (23% in 2006
globalization of the economy have made language compared with 10% in 2010).
skills more important than ever. Workers,
supervisors, customers and business partners may Personal Services Benefits
have different levels of English proficiency, and some by Organization Staff Size
may not speak English at all. To address this divide, and Organization Sector
some organizations offer foreign language classes
Again, larger organizations were more likely than
to workers or supervisors who frequently deal with
smaller organizations to offer many personal services
individuals whose native language is not English.
benefits. There were also considerable differences by
Seven percent of organizations offered some form of
sector in what personal services benefits were offered,
foreign language classes.
although few clear patterns emerged. Publicly owned
for-profit organizations were more likely to offer a
number of these benefits. All results by organization
staff size and sector are illustrated in the appendix.
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 41
care arrangement expenses (1%) incurred while on through 2010. There were no significant changes in
business travel. these benefits from 2009 to 2010.
Other Benefits Over the Past Five Years Other Benefits by Organization
Table K-2 shows the percentages of companies Staff Size and Organization Sector
offering these benefits from 2006 through 2010. With the exception of holiday parties, larger
Take your child to work day was the only benefit organizations were more likely than smaller
offered by fewer companies in 2010 compared organizations to offer many of these benefits.
with 2009. The following benefits were offered Likewise, privately and publicly owned for-profit
by fewer organizations in 2010 than in 2006: organizations were more likely than other sectors to
company picnic, company-purchased tickets, holiday indicate their organizations offered many of these
parties, milestone rewards, noncash companywide benefits. All results by organization staff size and
performance awards and take your child to work day. organization sector are displayed in the appendix.
Conclusions
After a decline in the number organizations offering employees now paying more attention to these
employee benefits from 2008 to 2009, the 2010 benefits, there is an opportunity for organizations Employees
study revealed that employee benefits have remained to help a more engaged workforce better understand consistently
relatively steady over the past 12 months. The the true value of their benefits packages. rate benefits,
only areas experiencing a downward trend since
As shown throughout this report, organizations
especially
2009 were housing and relocation and business health care
offer a wide range of traditional and nontraditional
travel benefits. It is important to note that some
benefits. In the past, the dilemma for organizations benefits, as
of the changes uncovered in this report appear
to have been in response to the changes in the
was how to offer the right mix of these benefits one of the key
economy, while other changes represent shifts that
to attract and retain top performers while also factors in job
balancing their increasing costs. The ability to
have gradually occurred over the last several years. satisfaction.
manage these ever-increasing costs, along with the
The fact that organizations have not made drastic
new health care legislation, will have a new and
reductions in their benefits offerings is a promising
profound impact on employee benefits programs
sign and displays the importance of benefits to both
in the future. These challenges in the midst of an
employees and employers.
economic recovery are laying a foundation for a
Employees consistently rate benefits, especially new way of doing business. Across all industries,
health care benefits, as one of the key factors in job HR professionals will be called upon to lead their
satisfaction. In addition, a recent survey of U.S. organizations through this complex and volatile
employers and employees revealed that because landscape to develop benefits strategies that enhance
of the recent economic events, 46% of employees productivity, attract and retain employees and build a
are taking a greater interest in understanding the strong employer brand.
benefits they receive through their employers.18 With
48 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
Methodology
A sample of HR professionals was randomly selected changes included SHRM’s own research of benefits
from SHRM’s membership database, which included trends, a need for clarification of some represented
approximately 250,000 individual members at the benefits, member input and external research
time the survey was conducted. Only members and resources. New or edited items are footnoted
who had not participated in a SHRM survey or throughout the report.
poll in the last four months were included in the
sampling frame. Members who were students, Notations
located internationally or had no e-mail address Analysis: Analyses by HR professionals’ staff size
on file were excluded from the sampling frame. In and employment sector are presented and discussed,
February 2010, an e-mail that included a hyperlink when applicable. In some cases, the data are not
to the Employee Benefits Survey19 was sent to 3,000 depicted in corresponding tables/figures even
randomly selected SHRM members. Of these, 2,850 though the results are statistically significant.
e-mails were successfully delivered to respondents,
xx Organization staff size categories: small (1 to 99
and 534 HR professionals responded, yielding a
employees), medium (100 to 499 employees) and
response rate of 19%. The survey was accessible
large (500 or more employees). The analysis by
for a period of four weeks, and multiple reminders
staff size refers to the number of full and part-time
were sent to nonrespondents in an effort to increase
employees at the responding HR professional’s
response rates. The sample of HR professionals was
work location only.
generally representative of the SHRM membership
xx Organization sector: publicly owned for-profit
population.
organization, privately owned for-profit organiza-
The report is composed of 11 benefits sections: tion, nonprofit organization, government sector
health care and welfare benefits, preventive health and “other” category. Results are not presented
and wellness benefits, retirement savings and for “other” employment sector due to the small
planning benefits, financial and compensation number of organizations in this category.
benefits, paid leave benefits, family-friendly benefits,
flexible working benefits, personal services benefits, Differences: Conventional statistical methods were
housing and relocation benefits, business travel used to determine if observed differences were
benefits, and other benefits. Each section has two statistically significant (i.e., there is a small likelihood
tables in the body of the report. Table 1 displays the that the differences occurred by chance). Therefore,
overall percentage of organizations that offer each in most cases, only results that were significant are
benefit, the percentage of organizations that offer included, unless otherwise noted. In some cases, data
the benefit but have plans to reduce or eliminate it may be discussed in the text of this report but not
within the next 12 months and the percentage of presented in an accompanying figure or table.
organizations that do not offer the benefit but have Tables: Unless otherwise noted in a specific table,
plans to do so within the next 12 months. Table 2 please note that the following are applicable to data
illustrates the percentage of organizations offering depicted in tables throughout this report.
benefits on an annual basis over a period of five
xx Percentages for a question or a response option
years. In the appendix, Table 3 presents data by
may not total 100% due to rounding.
organization staff size, as defined by the number
of employees at the respondent’s location. Table 4 xx The sample size is based on the actual number of
presents data by organization sector. respondents by organization sector and organiza-
tion staff size who answered the question using the
A number of benefits have been added, changed response options provided.
or dropped from 2009 to 2010. Forces driving the
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 49
xx Data are sorted in descending order by the first a question on the survey because the question or
percentage column in a table. some of its parts were not applicable or because the
requested data were unavailable. This also accounts
Figures: Unless otherwise noted in a specific figure,
for the varying number of responses within each
percentages for a question may not total 100% due to
table or figure.
rounding.
Confidence level and margin of error: A
Generalization of results: As with any research,
confidence level and margin of error give readers
readers should exercise caution when generalizing
some measure of how much they can rely on
results and take individual circumstances and
survey responses to represent all SHRM members.
experiences into consideration when making
Given the level of response to the survey, SHRM
decisions based on these data. While SHRM is
Research is 96% confident that responses given
confident in its research, it is prudent to understand
by responding HR professionals can be applied to
that the results presented in this survey report
all SHRM members, in general, with a margin of
are only truly representative of the sample of HR
error of approximately 4%. For example, 59% of HR
professionals responding to the survey.
professionals reported their organizations offered
Number of respondents: The number of wellness programs. With a 4% margin of error, the
respondents (indicated by “n” in figures and tables) reader can be 96% certain that between 55% and
varies from table to table and figure to figure 63% of SHRM members would report that their
because some respondents did not answer all of the organizations presently offer wellness programs.
questions. Individuals may not have responded to
50 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
Organization Industry
Manufacturing 19%
Health care, social assistance (e.g., in-home care, nursing homes, EAP providers, hospices, etc.) 13%
Other services 8%
Services—professional, scientific, technical, legal, engineering 8%
Educational services/education 7%
Retail/wholesale trade 7%
Financial services (e.g., banking) 5%
Government/public administration—federal, state/local, tribal 4%
Insurance 4%
Transportation, warehousing (e.g., distribution) 4%
Arts, entertainment, recreation 2%
Biotech 2%
Construction, mining, oil and gas 2%
Consulting 2%
High-tech 2%
Services—accommodation, food and drinking places 2%
Real estate, rental, leasing 2%
Telecommunications 2%
Utilities 2%
Association—professional/trade 1%
Pharmaceutical 1%
Publishing, broadcasting, other media 1%
Other 1%
(n = 532)
Region
Midwest (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin) 36%
South (Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, 27%
Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia)
West (Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Montana, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming) 21%
Northeast (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont) 16%
(n = 532)
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 51
Appendix
Benefits by Organization Staff Size and Organization Sector
Table A-3 Health Care and Welfare Benefits (by Organization Staff Size)
Overall Small Medium Large Differences Based on
(1–99 Employees) (100–499 Employees) (500 or More Employees) Staff Size*
Prescription drug program coverage 96% 93% 98% 98%
Dental insurance 94% 87% 97% 100% Large, medium > small
Mail-order prescription program 91% 88% 91% 93%
Chiropractic coverage 85% 82% 90% 82%
Preferred provider organization (PPO) 85% 79% 85% 92% Large > small
Accidental death and dismemberment insurance (AD&D) 82% 82% 81% 85%
Mental health coverage 82% 78% 85% 83%
Vision insurance 77% 61% 81% 89% Large, medium > small
Long-term disability insurance 76% 72% 74% 86% Large > medium, small
Employee assistance program (EAP) 75% 58% 78% 91% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Medical flexible spending accounts 72% 61% 73% 81% Large, medium > small
Short-term disability insurance 71% 60% 73% 81% Large, medium > small
Contraceptive coverage 68% 61% 73% 68% Medium > small
Rehabilitation assistance 45% 39% 46% 49%
Supplemental accident insurance 44% 38% 43% 54% Large > small
Health care premium flexible spending account 43% 39% 44% 46%
Health care coverage for dependent grandchildren 39% 23% 42% 53% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Domestic partner health care coverage (same-sex) 38% 26% 42% 46% Large, medium > small
Domestic partner health care coverage (opposite-sex) 37% 28% 41% 40% Large, medium > small
Health care coverage for foster children 37% 28% 37% 49% Large > medium, small
Health care coverage for part-time workers 37% 23% 32% 60% Large > medium, small
HMO (health maintenance organization) 33% 29% 31% 39%
Acupressure/acupuncture medical coverage 31% 25% 33% 36% Large > small
Bariatric coverage for weight loss 31% 29% 29% 36%
Cancer insurance 31% 31% 30% 33%
Long-term care insurance 31% 22% 33% 38% Large > small
Infertility treatment coverage (other than 30% 28% 31% 32%
in-vitro fertilization)
Surcharges for spousal health care coverage 26% 20% 26% 34% Large > small
In-vitro fertilization coverage 25% 17% 28% 29% Large > medium, small
Retiree health care coverage 25% 10% 26% 41% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Critical illness insurance 21% 17% 21% 26%
Point of service (POS) plan 21% 20% 22% 21%
Intensive care insurance 19% 17% 22% 17%
continued on page 52
52 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
Table A-3 Health Care and Welfare Benefits (by Organization Staff Size) (continued from page 51)
Overall Small Medium Large Differences Based on
(1–99 Employees) (100–499 Employees) (500 or More Employees) Staff Size*
Hospital indemnity insurance 19% 17% 19% 20%
Laser-based vision correction coverage 19% 14% 19% 23% Large > small
Wholesale generic drug program for injectable drugs 18% 12% 15% 28% Large > medium, small
Grief recovery program 17% 6% 19% 27% Large, medium > small
Support groups 17% 9% 15% 29% Large > medium, small
Consumer-directed health care plan (CDHP) 16% 12% 17% 17%
Pharmacy management program 15% 7% 16% 22% Large > small
Alternative/complementary medical coverage 14% 12% 14% 17%
Health savings account (HSA) 11% 9% 13% 12%
Exclusive provider organization (EPO) 9% 7% 9% 14%
Indemnity plan (fee-for-service) 8% 6% 9% 11%
Elective procedures coverage 7% 5% 6% 12%
Employer-matched contributions to health savings account 7% 6% 8% 5%
Health reimbursement account (HRA) 6% 4% 6% 7%
Experimental/elective drug coverage 3% 3% 2% 4%
Subsidized cost of elder care 3% 1% 3% 6%
Gender reassignment surgery coverage 2% 1% 3% 1%
(n = 532)
* Indicates a significant difference based on staff size. Blank cells in the last column indicate that no statistically significant differences were found.
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 53
Table A-4 Health Care and Welfare Benefits (by Organization Sector)
Overall Privately Owned Nonprofit Publicly Owned Government Differences Based on Sector*
For-Profit Organization For-Profit Sector
Organization Organization
Prescription drug program coverage 96% 96% 94% 100% 100%
Dental insurance 94% 93% 93% 100% 100%
Mail-order prescription program 91% 90% 89% 92% 97%
Chiropractic coverage 85% 86% 83% 88% 86%
Preferred provider organization (PPO) 85% 83% 82% 89% 97%
Accidental death and dismemberment insurance 82% 82% 82% 86% 75%
(AD&D)
Mental health coverage 82% 80% 86% 82% 83%
Vision insurance 77% 74% 75% 89% 83% Public(FP) > Private(FP), NP
Long-term disability insurance 76% 70% 81% 86% 83% Public(FP) > Private(FP)
Employee assistance program (EAP) 75% 68% 78% 94% 83% Public(FP) > Private(FP), NP
Medical flexible spending accounts 72% 65% 76% 82% 86% Govt > Private(FP)
Short-term disability insurance 71% 72% 60% 86% 61% Public(FP) > NP, Govt
Contraceptive coverage 68% 67% 64% 74% 78%
Rehabilitation assistance 45% 42% 46% 49% 53%
Supplemental accident insurance 44% 42% 40% 52% 58%
Health care premium flexible spending account 43% 41% 46% 40% 47%
Health care coverage for dependent grandchildren 39% 34% 41% 44% 61% Govt > Private(FP), NP,
Public(FP)
Domestic partner health care coverage (same-sex) 38% 32% 42% 56% 33% Public(FP) > Private(FP), Govt
Domestic partner health care coverage (opposite-sex) 37% 34% 38% 48% 31%
Health care coverage for foster children 37% 35% 36% 41% 47%
Health care coverage for part-time workers 37% 26% 56% 38% 56% NP, Govt > Private(FP),
Public(FP)
HMO (health maintenance organization) 33% 32% 35% 28% 44%
Acupressure/acupuncture medical coverage 31% 27% 35% 39% 39%
Bariatric coverage for weight loss 31% 28% 32% 34% 47%
Cancer insurance 31% 31% 32% 27% 42%
Long-term care insurance 31% 28% 27% 36% 53% Govt > Private(FP), NP
Infertility treatment coverage (other than 30% 28% 31% 39% 28%
in-vitro fertilization)
Surcharges for spousal health care coverage 26% 23% 26% 31% 39%
In-vitro fertilization coverage 25% 21% 24% 36% 28% Public(FP) > Private(FP)
Retiree health care coverage 25% 15% 30% 32% 75% Govt > Private(FP), NP,
Public(FP)
Critical illness insurance 21% 21% 21% 17% 36%
Point of service (POS) plan 21% 21% 19% 22% 25%
Intensive care insurance 19% 20% 20% 14% 25%
Hospital indemnity insurance 19% 18% 19% 19% 22%
Laser-based vision correction coverage 19% 17% 17% 23% 28%
Wholesale generic drug program for injectable drugs 18% 17% 13% 27% 14%
Grief recovery program 17% 15% 15% 24% 28%
Support groups 17% 13% 23% 19% 22%
continued on page 54
54 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
Table A-4 Health Care and Welfare Benefits (by Organization Sector) (continued from page 53)
Overall Privately Owned Nonprofit Publicly Owned Government Differences Based on Sector*
For-Profit Organization For-Profit Sector
Organization Organization
Consumer-directed health care plan (CDHP) 16% 16% 13% 18% 14%
Pharmacy management program 15% 15% 14% 16% 14%
Alternative/complementary medical coverage 14% 12% 18% 14% 22%
Health savings account (HSA) 11% 12% 10% 11% 11%
Exclusive provider organization (EPO) 9% 9% 4% 19% 6% Public(FP) > NP
Indemnity plan (fee-for-service) 8% 9% 5% 10% 8%
Elective procedures coverage 7% 5% 11% 10% 6%
Employer-matched contributions to health 7% 6% 9% 7% 3%
savings account
Health reimbursement account (HRA) 6% 6% 3% 9% 6%
Experimental/elective drug coverage 3% 2% 6% 1% 3%
Subsidized cost of elder care 3% 2% 3% 7% 6%
Gender reassignment surgery coverage 2% 1% 2% 2% 3%
(n = 529)
Privately owned for-profit organization = Private(FP)
Nonprofit organization = NP
Publicly owned for-profit organization = Public(FP)
Government sector = Govt
* Indicates a significant difference by sector. Blank cells in the last column indicate that no statistically significant differences were found.
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 55
Table B-3 Preventive Health and Wellness Benefits (by Organization Staff Size)
Overall Small Medium Large Differences Based on
(1–99 Employees) (100–499 Employees) (500 or More Employees) Staff Size*
Wellness resources and information 75% 60% 80% 84% Large, medium > small
On-site seasonal flu vaccinations 68% 44% 71% 92% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Wellness programs 59% 43% 57% 69% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
24-hour nurse line 56% 50% 58% 59% Large > small
CPR/first aid training 55% 43% 58% 62% Large, medium > small
Health screening programs 43% 25% 46% 58% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Health fairs 42% 18% 41% 72% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Wellness newsletter/column 41% 31% 39% 57% Large > medium, small
Smoking cessation program 39% 25% 36% 61% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
On-site H1N1 flu vaccinations 35% 12% 34% 65% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Fitness center membership subsidy/reimbursement 33% 25% 34% 41% Large > small
Health and lifestyle coaching 33% 17% 33% 51% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Preventive programs specifically targeting employees with 33% 18% 33% 51% Large > medium, small
chronic health conditions Medium > small
Weight-loss program 30% 13% 29% 51% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Rewards or bonuses for achieving or completing certain 28% 20% 28% 38% Large > small
health and wellness goals/programs
On-site fitness center 21% 10% 23% 33% Large > small
On-site blood pressure machine 20% 7% 22% 31% Large > small
Nutritional counseling 18% 10% 16% 31% Large > medium, small
On-site fitness classes 14% 4% 13% 29% Large > medium, small
Health care premium discount for getting an annual health 12% 5% 14% 17% Large > small
risk assessment
Massage therapy services at work 12% 4% 13% 19% Large > small
On-site sick room 12% 4% 13% 20% Large > small
Health care premium discount for not using 11% 3% 15% 14% Large, medium > small
tobacco products
On-site medical clinic 10% 1% 8% 25% Large > medium, small
Stress-reduction program 10% 3% 10% 19% Large > small
Health care premium discount for participating in a 9% 2% 11% 13% Large > small
wellness program
Fitness equipment subsidy/reimbursement 5% 4% 3% 7%
On-site nap room 5% 4% 5% 7%
Health care premium discount for participating in a 4% 1% 6% 5%
weight-loss program
(n = 532)
* Indicates a significant difference based on staff size. Blank cells in the last column indicate that no statistically significant differences were found.
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
56 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
Table B-4 Preventive Health and Wellness Benefits (by Organization Sector)
Overall Privately Owned Nonprofit Publicly Owned Government Differences Based on Sector*
For-Profit Organization For-Profit Sector
Organization Organization
Wellness resources and information 75% 69% 78% 85% 86% Public(FP), Govt > Private(FP)
On-site seasonal flu vaccinations 68% 61% 75% 76% 81% NP, Public(FP), Govt >
Private(FP)
Wellness programs 59% 52% 55% 65% 75% Public(FP), Govt > Private(FP)
24-hour nurse line 56% 54% 48% 67% 58% Public(FP) > NP
CPR/first aid training 55% 52% 65% 48% 64%
Health screening programs 43% 36% 50% 47% 67% NP, Govt > Private(FP)
Health fairs 42% 33% 52% 49% 67% NP, Govt > Private(FP)
Wellness newsletter/column 41% 38% 37% 49% 58% Govt > Private(FP), NP
Smoking cessation program 39% 35% 35% 49% 58% Public(FP), Govt > Private(FP),
NP
On-site H1N1 flu vaccinations 35% 25% 51% 36% 64% NP, Govt > Private(FP)
Fitness center membership subsidy/reimbursement 33% 30% 40% 36% 19%
Health and lifestyle coaching 33% 28% 32% 36% 56% Govt > Private(FP), NP,
Public(FP)
Preventive programs specifically targeting 33% 29% 28% 45% 47% Public(FP), Govt > Private(FP),
employees with chronic health conditions NP
Weight-loss program 30% 26% 25% 40% 42% Govt > NP
Rewards or bonuses for achieving or completing 28% 27% 25% 32% 36%
certain health and wellness goals/programs
On-site fitness center 21% 13% 35% 27% 33% NP, Govt > Private(FP)
On-site blood pressure machine 20% 16% 25% 25% 22%
Nutritional counseling 18% 17% 20% 18% 25%
On-site fitness classes 14% 7% 26% 14% 33% NP, Govt > Private(FP)
Health care premium discount for getting an annual 12% 11% 9% 18% 11%
health risk assessment
Massage therapy services at work 12% 10% 14% 14% 11%
On-site sick room 12% 12% 16% 13% 0% NP > Govt
Health care premium discount for not using 11% 12% 3% 19% 8% Public(FP) > NP
tobacco products
On-site medical clinic 10% 5% 19% 10% 22%
Stress-reduction program 10% 7% 14% 9% 17%
Health care premium discount for participating in a 9% 9% 5% 15% 6%
wellness program
Fitness equipment subsidy/reimbursement 5% 3% 8% 6% 0%
On-site nap room 5% 4% 5% 6% 6%
Health care premium discount for participating in a 4% 4% 2% 10% 3%
weight-loss program
(n = 529)
Privately owned for-profit organization = Private(FP)
Nonprofit organization = NP
Publicly owned for-profit organization = Public(FP)
Government sector = Govt
* Indicates a significant difference by sector. Blank cells in the last column indicate that no statistically significant differences were found.
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 57
Table C-3 Retirement Savings and Planning Benefits (by Organization Staff Size)
Overall Small Medium Large Differences Based
(1–99 Employees) (100–499 Employees) (500 or More Employees) on Staff Size*
Defined contribution retirement plan 92% 86% 93% 98% Large > small
Employer match for defined contribution retirement plan 72% 67% 72% 76%
Defined contribution plan loans 69% 73% 70% 63%
Balanced funds 60% 54% 62% 62%
Target-date retirement funds 46% 44% 45% 51%
Individual investment advice 40% 37% 41% 43%
Automatic enrollment into defined contribution 39% 32% 38% 50% Large > medium, small
retirement plan
Retirement planning services 39% 36% 39% 44%
Roth 401(k) savings plan 28% 28% 28% 29%
Defined benefit pension plan 27% 20% 25% 40% Large > medium, small
Automatic escalation of salary deferral amounts for defined 18% 13% 19% 22%
contribution plans
Supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) 11% 4% 9% 23% Large > medium, small
Cash balance pension plan 9% 7% 7% 14% Large > medium, small
Formal phased retirement program 6% 4% 3% 12% Large > medium, small
401(k) debit card 2% 1% 2% 2%
(n = 532)
* Indicates a significant difference based on staff size. Blank cells in the last column indicate that no statistically significant differences were found.
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
58 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
Table C-4 Retirement Savings and Planning Benefits (by Organization Sector)
Overall Privately Owned Nonprofit Publicly Owned Government Differences Based on Sector*
For-Profit Organization For-Profit Sector
Organization Organization
Defined contribution retirement plan 92% 90% 95% 98% 83%
Employer match for defined contribution 72% 69% 76% 85% 42% Public(FP) > Private(FP), Govt
retirement plan Private(FP), NP > Govt
Defined contribution plan loans 69% 70% 72% 65% 64%
Balanced funds 60% 61% 49% 73% 44% Private(FP), Public(FP) > NP,
Govt
Target-date retirement funds 46% 46% 45% 53% 31% Public(FP) > Govt
Individual investment advice 40% 37% 44% 47% 42%
Automatic enrollment into defined contribution 39% 34% 45% 47% 44%
retirement plan
Retirement planning services 39% 37% 39% 41% 50%
Roth 401(k) savings plan 28% 30% 24% 34% 19%
Defined benefit pension plan 27% 19% 35% 22% 83% Govt > Private(FP), NP,
Public(FP)
Automatic escalation of salary deferral amounts for 18% 17% 15% 27% 11%
defined contribution plans
Supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) 11% 5% 15% 25% 8% Public(FP) > Private(FP)
Cash balance pension plan 9% 5% 13% 14% 11%
Formal phased retirement program 6% 3% 6% 6% 25% Govt > Private(FP)
401(k) debit card 2% 2% 3% 1% 0%
(n = 529)
Privately owned for-profit organization = Private(FP)
Nonprofit organization = NP
Publicly owned for-profit organization = Public(FP)
Government sector = Govt
* Indicates a significant difference by sector. Blank cells in the last column indicate that no statistically significant differences were found.
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
Table D-3 Financial and Compensation Benefits (by Organization Staff Size)
Overall Small Medium Large Differences Based on
(1–99 Employees) (100–499 Employees) (500 or More Employees) Staff Size*
Payroll deductions 93% 88% 95% 94%
On-site parking 90% 89% 90% 91%
Life insurance 87% 80% 88% 94% Large > small
Business cell phone or handheld device for personal use 62% 58% 62% 66%
Undergraduate educational assistance 62% 44% 64% 80% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Life insurance for dependents 58% 44% 58% 77% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Incentive bonus plan (executive) 54% 48% 53% 63% Large > small
Graduate educational assistance 56% 38% 57% 75% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Automobile allowances for business use of personal 49% 45% 53% 46%
vehicles
Incentive bonus plan (nonexecutive) 46% 42% 46% 51%
Employee referral bonus 41% 23% 46% 53% Large, medium > small
Shift premiums 41% 20% 45% 59% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
continued on page 59
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 59
Table D-3 Financial and Compensation Benefits (by Organization Staff Size) (continued from page 58)
Overall Small Medium Large Differences Based on
(1–99 Employees) (100–499 Employees) (500 or More Employees) Staff Size*
Employee discounts on company services 38% 25% 40% 50% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Credit union 36% 22% 42% 42% Large, medium > small
Donations for participation in charitable events 34% 29% 35% 37%
Full flexible benefits plan 30% 18% 29% 44% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Spot bonus 30% 31% 26% 36%
Financial planning services 28% 18% 29% 40% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Employee computer purchase discounts (not a loan) 26% 13% 25% 41% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Sign-on bonus (executive) 26% 13% 29% 38% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Accelerated death benefits 25% 14% 27% 36% Large > small
Accident insurance 24% 17% 19% 39% Large > medium, small
Company-owned car for employee use 23% 19% 26% 22%
Matching charitable contributions 23% 16% 24% 31% Large > small
Payroll advances 19% 20% 19% 15%
Loans to employees for emergency/disaster assistance 18% 15% 22% 16%
Scholarships for members of employees’ families 17% 6% 15% 33% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Credit counseling service 16% 10% 16% 24% Large > small
Sign-on bonus (nonexecutive) 16% 7% 17% 25% Large > small
Retention bonus (executive) 14% 6% 14% 23% Large > small
Qualified transportation spending account 12% 6% 15% 15% Large, medium > small
Stock purchase plan 12% 4% 14% 20% Large > small
Retention bonus (nonexecutive) 11% 3% 12% 20% Large > small
Transit subsidy 11% 8% 10% 17% Large > small
Auto insurance program 10% 4% 9% 20% Large > medium, small
Incentive stock options (ISOs) 10% 4% 10% 15% Large > small
On-site check cashing 9% 4% 10% 13% Large > small
Loans for employees to purchase personal computers 7% 4% 10% 8%
Low-/no-interest loans to employees for non-emergency 7% 4% 9% 7%
situations
Parking subsidy 7% 7% 5% 10%
Non-qualified stock options (NQSOs or NSOs) 6% 3% 4% 13% Large > small
Carpooling subsidy 5% 1% 5% 9% Large > small
Free computers to employees for personal use 5% 8% 4% 4%
Educational loans for members of employees’ families 3% 1% 3% 4%
Free or discounted home Internet service 3% 2% 3% 3%
Personal tax services 2% 2% 2% 4%
(n = 532)
* Indicates a significant difference based on staff size. Blank cells in the last column indicate that no statistically significant differences were found.
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
60 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
Table D-4 Financial and Compensation Benefits (by Organization Sector) (continued from page 60)
Overall Privately Owned Nonprofit Publicly Owned Government Differences Based on Sector*
For-Profit Organization For-Profit Sector
Organization Organization
On-site check cashing 9% 5% 15% 10% 17%
Loans for employees to purchase personal computers 7% 7% 8% 6% 11%
Low-/no-interest loans to employees for non- 7% 7% 5% 8% 3%
emergency situations
Parking subsidy 7% 6% 12% 3% 11%
Non-qualified stock options (NQSOs or NSOs) 6% 3% 0% 26% 0% Public(FP) > Private(FP), NP, Govt
Carpooling subsidy 5% 4% 4% 7% 8%
Free computers to employees for personal use 5% 4% 11% 3% 3%
Educational loans for members of employees’ families 3% 2% 2% 3% 6%
Free or discounted home Internet service 3% 4% 2% 2% 0%
Personal tax services 2% 3% 3% 1% 0%
(n = 529)
Privately owned for-profit organization = Private(FP)
Nonprofit organization = NP
Publicly owned for-profit organization = Public(FP)
Government sector = Govt
* Indicates a significant difference by sector. Blank cells in the last column indicate that no statistically significant differences were found.
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
62 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
Paid sick leave plan 36% 34% 40% 32% 56% Govt >
Private(FP), NP, Public(FP)
Paid personal day(s) 29% 30% 30% 28% 28%
Paid family leave 24% 17% 36% 20% 50% Govt >
Private(FP), NP, Public(FP)
Paid military leave 22% 16% 21% 34% 44% Govt >
Private(FP), NP
Family leave above required federal FMLA leave 20% 18% 18% 25% 31%
Paid time off to serve on the board of a community 20% 19% 25% 17% 19%
group or professional association
Family leave above required state FMLA leave 19% 17% 16% 24% 22%
Paid time off cash-out option 19% 19% 18% 19% 22%
Paid vacation cash-out option 18% 20% 12% 17% 28%
Paid maternity leave 17% 13% 26% 17% 22%
Paid paternity leave 17% 11% 25% 20% 33% Govt > Private(FP)
Paid time off for volunteering 17% 15% 19% 25% 8%
Parental leave above federal FMLA leave 17% 15% 17% 22% 28%
Parental leave above state FMLA leave 17% 16% 16% 22% 22%
Time bank of vacation leave 17% 14% 19% 16% 33% Govt >
Private(FP), NP, Public(FP)
Paid adoption leave 16% 10% 25% 19% 33% Govt >
Private(FP), Public(FP)
Unpaid sabbatical program 16% 12% 24% 9% 44% Govt >
Private(FP), NP, Public(FP)
NP > Private(FP), Public(FP
Time bank of paid time off 15% 11% 20% 11% 36% Govt >
Private(FP), Public(FP)
Elder care leave above federal FMLA leave 11% 10% 9% 14% 22%
Elder care leave above state FMLA leave 11% 11% 9% 14% 19%
Time bank of sick leave 11% 9% 11% 8% 39% Govt >
Private(FP), Public(FP)
Paid day off for employee’s birthday 10% 10% 12% 7% 8%
Emergency flexibility 7% 7% 5% 10% 3%
Paid sick leave cash-out option 7% 6% 4% 6% 22%
Vacation purchase plan 5% 5% 3% 9% 6%
Paid sabbatical program 4% 3% 10% 0% 11% Govt , NP > Public(FP)
Company-paid time off for group vacations 1% 2% 1% 0% 0%
(= 529)
Privately owned for-profit organization = Private(FP)
Nonprofit organization = NP
Publicly owned for-profit organization = Public(FP)
Government sector = Govt
* Indicates a significant difference by sector. Blank cells in the last column indicate that no statistically significant differences were found.
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
64 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
Table I-3 Housing and Relocation Benefits (by Organization Staff Size)
Overall Small Medium Large Differences Based on Staff Size*
(1–99 Employees) (100–499 Employees) (500 or More Employees)
Temporary relocation benefits 28% 12% 30% 43% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Relocation lump-sum payment 28% 13% 30% 41% Large > medium, small
Medium > small
Location visit assistance 20% 10% 21% 30% Large > small
Assistance selling previous home 11% 1% 12% 20% Large > small
Cost-of-living differential 10% 3% 12% 14% Large > small
Spouse relocation assistance 10% 4% 14% 11% Medium > small
Home insurance program 6% 3% 6% 11%
Housing counseling 6% 2% 6% 9%
Reimbursement for financial loss sustained 5% 1% 6% 7%
from a home sale
Mortgage assistance 3% 1% 3% 5%
Rental assistance 3% 1% 4% 6%
Renter insurance program 3% 1% 3% 7%
Down payment assistance 2% 1% 2% 4%
Mortgage insurance 1% 1% 0% 2%
(n = 532)
* Indicates a significant difference based on staff size. Blank cells in the last column indicate that no statistically significant differences were found.
Source: 2010 Employee Benefits (SHRM, 2010)
Benefits Index
A B Certification/recertification fees
Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4
Accelerated death benefits Babies at work
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4 Charitable contributions
Access to backup child care services, Balanced funds Donations for participation in events
Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4 Table C–1, Table C–2, Table C–3, Table C–4 Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Matching
Access to backup elder care services Bariatric coverage for weight loss Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4 Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Check cashing, on-site
Accident insurance Bereavement leave, paid Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4
Child care
Accident insurance, supplemental Birthdays, paid day off
Access to backup services
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4
Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4
Accidental death and dismemberment Blood pressure machine, on-site Expenses while on business travel
insurance Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4 Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Referral service
Break arrangements
Acupressure/acupuncture medical Table G–1, Table G–2, Table G–3, Table G–4 Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4
coverage Bring child to work in emergency Child care center
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4 Consortium
AD&D. See Accidental death and Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4
Business cell phone or handheld device for
dismemberment insurance personal use Nonsubsidized
Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4
Additional pay for weekend travel Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4 Subsidized
Business laptop for personal use while on Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4
Adoption assistance business travel
Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4 Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4 Chiropractic coverage
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Adoption leave, paid Business travel benefits
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4 College/school selection/referral
Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4
Airline club membership C
Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4 Community groups, paid time off to serve
Cancer insurance on board
Alternating location arrangements Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4
Table G–1, Table G–2, Table G–3, Table G–4
Car or limo service to/from airport Community volunteer programs
Alternative/complementary medical Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4 Table K–1, Table K–2, Table K–3, Table K–4
coverage
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Career counseling Company-owned car for employee use
Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4 Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Assistance selling previous home
Table I–1, Table I–2, Table I–3, Table I–4 Carpooling subsidy Company-paid time off for group vacations
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4
ATMs, on-site
Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4 Cash balance pension plan Company picnic
Table C–1, Table C–2, Table C–3, Table C–4 Table K–1, Table K–2, Table K–3, Table K–4
Auto insurance program
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Casual dress day Company-purchased tickets
Every day Table K–1, Table K–2, Table K–3, Table K–4
Automatic enrollment into defined
Table G–1, Table G–2, Table G–3, Table G–4 Compensation benefits. See Financial and
contribution retirement plan
Table C–1, Table C–2, Table C–3, Table C–4 One day per week compensation benefits
Table G–1, Table G–2, Table G–3, Table G–4
Automatic escalation of salary deferral Compressed workweek
Seasonal Table G–1, Table G–2, Table G–3, Table G–4
amounts for defined contribution plans Table G–1, Table G–2, Table G–3, Table G–4
Table C–1, Table C–2, Table C–3, Table C–4 Computers
CDHP. See Consumer-directed health
Automobile allowances for business use care plan Business laptop for personal use while
of personal vehicles on travel
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Cell phone and/or handheld device for Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4
personal use Free to employees for personal use
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 77
Loans for employees to purchase Domestic partner health care coverage Employee keeps frequent flyer miles
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Opposite-sex partners Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4
Purchase discounts Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Employee keeps hotel points
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Same-sex partners Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4
Concierge services Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Employee referral bonus
Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4 Donations for participation in charitable Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Consortium child care center events
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Employer match for defined contribution
Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4
retirement plan
Consumer-directed health care plan Down payment assistance Table C–1, Table C–2, Table C–3, Table C–4
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Table I–1, Table I–2, Table I–3, Table I–4
Employer-matched contributions to health
Contraceptive coverage Drugs. See Prescription drug program saving accounts
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 coverage Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Cost-of-living differential Dry cleaning services Employer-sponsored personal shopping
Table I–1, Table I–2, Table I–3, Table I–4 Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4 discounts
Dry cleaning while on business travel Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4
CPR/first aid training
Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4 Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4 English as a second language classes
Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4
Credit counseling service E
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 EPO. See Exclusive provider organization
EAP. See Employee assistance program
Credit union ESL. See English as a second language
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Educational assistance classes
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Critical illness insurance Exclusive provider organization
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Educational loans for members of Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
employees' families
Cross-training to develop skills not directly Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Executive club memberships
related to the job Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4
Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4 Elder care
Access to backup services Experimental/elective drug coverage
Cultural event tickets. See Company- Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4 Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
purchased tickets
Assisted living assessments F
Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4
D Family-friendly benefits
Geriatric counseling
Defined benefit pension plan Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4 Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4
Table C–1, Table C–2, Table C–3, Table C–4
In-home assessments Family leave
Defined contribution plan loans Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4 Above and beyond required federal
Table C–1, Table C–2, Table C–3, Table C–4 Leave above and beyond federal FMLA FMLA leave
Defined contribution retirement plan Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4
Table C–1, Table C–2, Table C–3, Table C–4 Leave above and beyond state FMLA Above and beyond required state FMLA
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 leave
Dental insurance Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4
On-site fairs
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4 Paid
Dependent care flexible spending account Referral service Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4
Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4 Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4 Financial and compensation benefits
Direct deposit Subsidized cost Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4 Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Financial planning services
Disability insurance Elective procedures coverage Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
First aid training
Discount ticket services Emergency flexibility Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4
Table K–1, Table K–2, Table K–3, Table K–4 Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4
First or business class airfare
Domestic partner benefits (other than Employee assistance program Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4
health care) Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Fitness center, on-site
Opposite-sex partners Employee computer purchase discounts Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4
Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4 Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Same-sex partners Employee discounts on company services
Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
78 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
Fitness center membership subsidy/ Graduate educational assistance Health screening programs
reimbursement Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4
Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4
Grandchildren, health care coverage for HMOs. See Health maintenance
Fitness classes, on-site dependents organizations
Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4 Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
H1N1 flu vaccinations, on-site
Fitness equipment subsidy/ Grief recovery program Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4
reimbursement Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Holiday parties
Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4
Group vacations. See Company-paid time Table K–1, Table K–2, Table K–3, Table K–4
529 plan off for group vacations Holidays, paid
Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4
H Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4
Flexible spending accounts, medical Home insurance program
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Haircuts, on-site
Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4 Table I–1, Table I–2, Table I–3, Table I–4
Flextime Hospital indemnity insurance
Table G–1, Table G–2, Table G–3, Table G–4 Handheld devices. See Cell phone and/or
handheld device for personal use Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Floating holidays Hotel points
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 Health and lifestyle coaching
Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4 Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4
Flu vaccinations, on-site Housing benefits
Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4 Health care
Table I–1, Table I–2, Table I–3, Table I–4
Food services/subsidized cafeteria Dependent grandchildren coverage
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Housing counseling
Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4
Domestic partner coverage Table I–1, Table I–2, Table I–3, Table I–4
Foreign language classes Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 HRA. See Health reimbursement accounts
Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4
Foster children coverage
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
HSA. See Health savings accounts
Formal phased retirement program
Table C–1, Table C–2, Table C–3, Table C–4 Part-time worker coverage I
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Foster care assistance In-vitro fertilization coverage
Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4 Premium discount for getting annual
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
health risk assessment
Foster children, health care coverage Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4 Incentive bonus plan
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Premium discount for not using tobacco Executive
401(k) debit card products Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Table C–1, Table C–2, Table C–3, Table C–4 Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4 Nonexecutive
Free computers to employees for personal Premium discount for participating in a Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
use weight-loss program Incentive stock options
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Premium discount for participating in
Free/discounted uniforms wellness program Indemnity plan (fee-for-service)
Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4 Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4 Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Free or discounted home Internet service Premium flexible spending account Individual investment advice
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Table C–1, Table C–2, Table C–3, Table C–4
Frequent flyer miles Retiree coverage Infertility treatment coverage
Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4 Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
In-vitro fertilization
Surcharges for spousal coverage Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Full flexible benefits plan Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Other than in-vitro fertilization
Health club fees while on travel Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
G Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4
Intensive care insurance
Gender reassignment surgery coverage Health fairs Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4
Internet
Generic drug program for injectable Health maintenance organizations Free or discounted home service
drugs Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Health reimbursement accounts Paid access while on travel
Geriatric counseling Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4
Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4 Health savings accounts ISOs. See Incentive stock options
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 79
Paid maternity leave Pay-per-view movies at hotel Professional license application or renewal
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4 fees
Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4
Paid military leave Paycards
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4 Professional memberships
Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4
Paid minibar snacks at hotel Payroll advances
Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4 Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Q
Paid paternity leave Payroll deductions Qualified transportation spending account
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Paid pay-per-view movies at hotel Per diem for meals
Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4 Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4 R
Paid personal days Performance awards. See Noncash Rehabilitation assistance
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 companywide performance awards Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Paid sabbatical program Personal computers. See Computers Reimbursement for financial loss sustained
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 from a home sale
Personal days, paid Table I–1, Table I–2, Table I–3, Table I–4
Paid sick leave cash-out option Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 Relocation benefits
Personal services benefits Table I–1, Table I–2, Table I–3, Table I–4
Paid sick leave plan Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 Relocation lump sum payment
Personal tax services Table I–1, Table I–2, Table I–3, Table I–4
Paid time off cash-out option Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 Rental assistance
Pet care arrangements while on business Table I–1, Table I–2, Table I–3, Table I–4
Paid time off for volunteering travel
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4 Rental car upgrades
Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4
Paid time off plan Pet health insurance
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4 Renter insurance program
Table I–1, Table I–2, Table I–3, Table I–4
Paid time off to serve on the board of Pets at work
a community group or professional Table K–1, Table K–2, Table K–3, Table K–4 Results-only work environment
association Table G–1, Table G–2, Table G–3, Table G–4
Pharmacy management program
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 Retention bonus
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Paid travel expenses for spouse Point of service plan Executive
Table J–1, Table J–2, Table J–3, Table J–4 Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Paid vacation cash-out option Nonexecutive
POS plan. See Point of service plan Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4
Postal services for employees Retiree health care coverage
Paid vacation plan Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4 Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4
PPOs. See Preferred provider Retirement planning services
Parental leave organizations Table C–1, Table C–2, Table C–3, Table C–4
Above and beyond federal FMLA
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 Preferred provider organizations Retirement program, formal phased
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Table C–1, Table C–2, Table C–3, Table C–4
Above and beyond state FMLA
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4 Prepared take-home meals Rewards or bonuses for achieving or
Parenting workplace seminars Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4 completing certain health and wellness
Table F–1, Table F–2, Table F–3, Table F–4 Prescription drug program coverage goals/programs
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4
Parking
On-site services, Preventive programs specifically targeting Roth 401(k) savings plan
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 employees with chronic health conditions Table C–1, Table C–2, Table C–3, Table C–4
Subsidy Table B–1, Table B–2, Table B–3, Table B–4 ROWE. See Results-only work
Table D–1, Table D–2, Table D–3, Table D–4 Professional associations, paid time off to environment
Part-time workers serve on board
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4
S
Health care coverage
Table A–1, Table A–2, Table A–3, Table A–4 Sabbatical program
Professional development opportunities
Table H–1, Table H–2, Table H–3, Table H–4 Paid
Paternity leave, paid Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4
Table E–1, Table E–2, Table E–3, Table E–4
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 81
Endnotes
1
For more information about this legislation, 11
For 2010, “babies at work” was added to the
SHRM’s Health Care Resource Page is a family-friendly benefits section.
one-stop resource with all of the latest articles, 12
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2008). Families with
stories, videos, webcasts and advocacy efforts
own children: Employment status of parents by age
surrounding health care reform. Please visit
of youngest child and family type, 2006-07 annual
www.shrm.org/hrdisciplines/healthcare.
averages. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from
2
For 2010, “on-site H1N1 flu vaccinations” and www.bls.gov/news.release/famee.t04.htm.
“on-site seasonal flu vaccinations” were added to 13
For more information on backup care, please
the health and welfare benefits section.
refer to SHRM’s survey brief on this topic,
3
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Backup Care: Alternative Child and Family Care
(2003). HHS issues report on the impact of poor Arrangements (SHRM, 2007).
health on businesses [News release]. Retrieved 14
National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP.
April 1, 2010, from www.hhs.gov/news
(2009). Caregiving in the U.S. Retrieved April 1,
/press/2003pres/20030916.html.
2010, from www.caregiving.org/data
4
For 2010, “automatic escalation of salary deferral /CaregivingUSAllAgesExecSum.pdf.
amounts for defined contribution plans” was 15
For 2010, “seasonal casual dress” was added to
added to the retirement savings and planning
the flexible working benefits section.
benefits section.
16
Society for Human Resource Management. (2010,
5
U.S. Census Bureau. (2004). Journey to work:
June). 2010 employee job satisfaction: A research
2000. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from
report by SHRM. Alexandria, VA: Author.
www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/c2kbr-33.pdf.
17
For 2010, “pay cards” was added to the personal
6
Ibid.
services benefits section.
7
Society for Human Resource Management. 18
MetLife. (2009). MetLife study of employee benefits
(2009, June). SHRM Poll: Assistance
trends. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from www.
organizations offer to help employees deal with high
whymetlife.com/trends.
gas prices. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from www.
shrm.org/surveys/. 19
This survey instrument is available upon request
by contacting the SHRM Survey Program at
8
SHRM Human Capital Benchmarking Database
surveys@shrm.org or by phone at 703-535-6301.
(unpublished data, 2009)
9
HR professionals were asked to indicate that their
organizations offered either a paid time off plan
or paid vacation plan, paid sick leave plan and/or
paid personal leave.
10
The employee must work at a site at which the
employer has 50 or more employees within
a 75-mile radius.
2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy 83
Benefits Diversity
1. 2009 Cost of Health Care Benchmarking Study: 1. Global Diversity and Inclusion: Perceptions,
Executive Summary (December 2009) Practices and Attitudes Survey Report (June
2009)
2. The U.S. Recession and Its Impact on Employee
Retirement (August 2009) 2. 2008 Religion and Corporate Culture Survey
Report (October 2008)
3. 2010 Employee Benefits Survey Report (June
2009) 3. 2007 State of the Workplace Diversity
Management Survey Report (February 2008)
4. Examining Paid Leave in the Workplace (April
2009) 4. 2006 Workplace Diversity and Changes to the
EEO-1 Process Survey Report (October 2006)
Business Leadership
1. What Senior HR Leaders Need to Know: Employee Relations
Perspectives from the United States, Canada, 1. Workplace Policies for Office Pools (January
India, the Middle East and North Africa 2010)
Executive Summary (March 2010)
2. 2009 Job Satisfaction Survey Report (June 2009)
2. The Impact of the U.S. and Global Economic
3. Point of View: The Economic Downturn from
Decline on Businesses (April 2009)
the Employee Perspective (April 2009)
3. Leading Now, Leading the Future: What Senior
4. 2008 Job Satisfaction Survey Report (June 2008)
HR Leaders Need to Know (February 2009)
4. Key Priorities for the HR Profession Through Ethics and Sustainability
2015 (December 2008) 1. The Ethics Landscape in American Business
Survey Report (June 2008)
Compensation 2. Green Workplace (January 2008)
1. SHRM Compensation Data Center
3. 2007 Corporate Social Responsibility Pilot Study
2. 2006 HR Practices in Executive-Level (April 2007)
Compensation Survey Report (May 2006)
84 2010 Employee Benefits Examining Employee Benefits in the Midst of a Recovering Economy
To access these reports and view a complete listing of all SHRM Survey products,
please visit www.shrm.org/Surveys.
Project Team
This report is published by the Society Project leader: Shawn Fegley, survey research analyst
for Human Resource Management
(SHRM). All content is for informational Project contributors: Evren Esen, manager, SHRM Survey Research Center
purposes only and is not to be construed
as a guaranteed outcome. The Society for Jennifer Schramm, M. Phil., manager, Workplace Trends and
Human Resource Management cannot Forecasting Program
accept responsibility for any errors or
omissions or any liability resulting from the External contributors: SHRM Total Rewards/Compensation and Benefits Special
use or misuse of any such information. Expertise Panel: Jennifer C. Loftus CCP, CBP, GRP, SPHR;
Theresa Perry, SPHR
© June 2010 Society for Human Resource
Management. All rights reserved. Printed Copy editing: Katya Scanlan, copy editor
in the United States of America.
Design: Jihee Lombardi, graphic designer
This publication may not be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system or transmitted Production: Bonnie Claggett, production traffic coordinator
in whole or in part, in any form or
by any means, electronic, mechanical,
photocopying, recording or otherwise,
without the prior written permission of the
Society for Human Resource Management.
10-0280
ISBN 978-1-586-44201-9
9 781586 442019
FSC logo
2010 Employee Benefits
Price: $79.95 Members | $199.95 Nonmembers
62.27043