Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
WWW.INDICSTUDIES.US
A BOOK PROPOSAL
AIMS OF THE BOOK
A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
The book is primarily about the history of Calendrical Astronomy in the Indian subcontinent and other
civilizations of Antiquity. However since most astronomical activity in the ancient worlda was related
to the calendar, it could for all practical purposes serve as a history of astronomy as well as the
calendar. Since the concept of time and cosmogony is intimately related to these topics, the book can
also be regarded as a history of time. The focus of the book is the contribution of the Indian
subcontinent over the millennia to this topic. We plan the content to include the relevant episteme from
the other ancient civilization to , so that it will become clearer that the ancients of the Indic world did
not merely construct a pale replica of earlier efforts by the Greeks and the Babylonians. In fact we will
demonstrate that the Greeks were nowhere in the picture when the first results started pouring out of
the Vedanga Jyotish
Brief Description
In a few paragraphs, describe the work. Be sure to include what you consider to be
the outstanding, distinctive, or unique features of the work. This narrative description should
contribution to scholarship,
and place in the literature. Please state your argument concisely and clearly.
1
Why I wrote this book
As I was researching the history of mathematics, it dawned on me that a lot of the numerical techniques used in
Engineering had their antecedents in the work of ancient Indic mathematicians. Till then I was focusing on Greek
mathematics. But apart from the work of pseudo Euclid (who used little or no Algebra) and the work on conic
sections by Apollonius, I did not find the Greek effort particularly rich in algorithms. It took many years for me to
realize that most of the Algebra, Analytical geometry and Trigonometry, we deal with in High school and even at an
undergraduate level, did not have its roots in the Occident. My desire to learn more about the Indic contribution
continued to be hampered by lack of adequate texts on history of ancient Mathematics in the English language.
While the situation was slightly better in French and German, the trail was very cold by the time you went back
beyond 1400 CE and could not pick up any of the threads in the work of the Greeks. I came to the realization that
there was very little extant of the Greek work in mathematics and this is even more true in the case of Astronomy.
No European text could explain in a satisfactory manner why there was no progress in the sciences in Europe
between the beginning of the common era and 1400 CE other than saying that the Church played a big part in
structuring the content and extent of education. What is particularly galling is that the Occidental admits that all
Greek work was lost to Europe, but he credits the Indic with getting their hands on the Greek work, even though
these works were presumably lost at a very early time. It seems even more likely that whatever Greek texts that
existed at that time became rapidly obsolete and were no longer reproduced because there was no longer any need
for them.
The stonewalling of the Indic contribution is of relatively recent origin and has strong parallels in the effort to
emasculate the Indic tradition, and it is only after I read extensively in the Indology literature , did I realize that the
whole pattern of denigration of the Indic past was a concerted effort to reduce the Indic civilization to an ‘also ran’
category.
Typical of recent books is one by Glen Van Brummelen 1 on the Mathematics of the Heavens and the Earth. This
book is better than most since it mentions India and devotes a full chapter to India. But it makes the obligatory bow
to the notion that India is a secondary source of developments when he titles the very first section in this chapter
“Transmission from Babylon and Greece”. There is absolutely no evidence given of this vaunted transmission and
yet we are asked to accept this statement unquestioningly. He then goes on to say that much of the origin is
controversial and is marred by national pride. This is indeed a strange remark to make. It is accepted that the
English should have pride in the achievements of Sir Isaac Newton but this would hardly be regarded as an issue in
evaluating the work of Newton. Then he goes on to say that “There seems little doubt that the spark for
Trigonometry came from importing of some Pre-Ptolemaic version of Greek mathematical astronomy”. The casual
manner with which he makes this categorical assertion, and which denies the Indic civilization the originality of its
contribution in Trigonometry is stunning in its certitude and hubris. He then goes on to cite Pingree as a starting
point. All I can say is that, the Indics have a proverb that translates “In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is
King”.
There is one final point to be made. Nowhere does he mention that there is an equal likelihood (and in my opinion a
far greater one that it was the Greeks who learnt Mathematics and Geometry from the Indics). I amplify on the
possibilities of this in the chapter on transmissions. The refusal to entertain such a possibility is a telling
commentary on the lack of objectivity and I would go so far as to say that there is not even an attempt at such
objectivity.
1
Glen van Brummelen, 2009, Mathematics of the Heavens and the Earth, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
2
I regard this book to be primarily a pedagogical text, despite the fact that I have glossed over important derivations
I believe like the Commentators of Indic antiquity in the proper understanding of what we already know. The
choice of material to include in the book always presents a dilemma. The scope of Ancient Indic Mathematics and
Astronomy is so large that it would need several volumes to provide an exhaustive encyclopedic coverage. The
alarming increase in the size of the book forced me to make difficult choices. However, we are planning a sequel to
this text which will contain many of the missing topics as well as amplify on the main principles of the astronomy of
the solar system as practiced by the ancients.
The time line for this study is a rather large one dating from the compositions of the Veda (6000 BCE), through the
Sūtra period, the Pre-siddhāntic period, the Jaina contributions up to the Siddhāntic era, and finally ending with the
Keplerian Newtonian formulations (17th century CE).
I would like to think that the book would be of interest to a wide range of people. It should be of interest to the
layman, as it provides a lot of reference material on History and the Calendar. It could serve as a textbook in a
course on the history of Astronomy. It would serve as an excellent introduction for amateur astronomers and last
but not least it could serve as a reference for graduate level research.
Part of the reason I wrote this book is to influence all my readers, regardless of their ethnicity, ideology, or
geography to adopt a more global perspective on matters relating to History and philosophy of the sciences. Under
such a perspective, few would feel compelled to defend or attack a viewpoint if the extent of the antiquity was the
sole issue at stake. But the yearning for a competitive antiquity is not restricted to those of a particular ethnicity. It
appears to be a predominant factor when a more aggressive and authoritarian civilization subjugates a people with
a more advanced episteme. Time and again, this pattern of behavior has been the norm, where the aggressor has
adopted the Epistemes of the subjugated people, after devoting a massive effort to absorb the knowledge, and
once he is fairly confident that he has been successful in this endeavor, he will turn around and assert precisely the
opposite, that in fact it is the subjugated civilization that has borrowed the episteme and the resulting knowledge.
Keep in mind that antiquity affects many factors that have a bearing on the sense of uniqueness that a people have
of them and a sense that continuity and longevity of a civilization bestows a modicum of a sense of wellbeing. A
loss of epistemic continuity that is now being experienced in the Indian subcontinent has long term consequences
for the manner in which the Indics will look upon themselves. Civilization is a fragile thing, if I may paraphrase Will
Durant, the great historian who compiled the monumental Story of Civilization over a thirty year period, and it does
not take much to obliterate a civilization. All it takes is an utterly ruthless individual who by the force of his
personality, ideas and incredible energy, can compel a sufficiently large populace to do his bidding and you may
rest assured that such an Individual will raise again. So how will the Indics handle such a situation in the future?
Well for one thing, defeat under such circumstances is not an option and surely, the Indics will not get a third
chance, when the patient was in comatose condition after the last 2 rounds. A decay of a civilization can also occur
through sheer apathy and ignorance, when large sections of the populace remain happily oblivious of the past in a
massive exhibition of epistemic amnesia. This is all the more sad when it occurs as a consequence of public policy
adopted by the democratic representatives of an elected government and legislature.
This book is not about the glories of a bygone era, where one bemoans the ephemeral nature of an enlightened
past. It is a recounting of the irreversible nature of the changes that take place when a civilization is subjugated. Its
traditions are ridiculed. Its history is rewritten, its language is driven into oblivion and any attempt to combat this
assault albeit in a non-violent and scholarly manner marks the individual as a fundamentalist. The calendar,
astronomy, and the story of time combine to make a fascinating chapter in the story of the Homo Sapiens, but it is
the larger Civilizational canvas that I hope the reader will focus on.
3
What do I take away from the writing of this book? My faith in the universality of the human spirit. If there is one
thing above all that I treasure from this experience is that the love of science and mathematics does not recognize
man made geographies, boundaries, ethnic classifications, language, social strata or economics. It is for this reason
I find that the current Eurocentric emphasis in the Occident which persists among authors even to this day to be a
anathema and to be of a particularly egregious nature with which I have little sympathy and have no tolerance
whatsoever.
We will tell the story of the Indic contribution much of it from the mouths of Occidentals , a small band
of whom has kept the flame of truth and integrity alive. It is a fact that their pronouncements are
rarely quoted in the conventional accounts of the History of Astronomy. In most accounts of the History
of Astronomy there is little or no mention of the Indic contribution.
The book is profusely illustrated because Astronomy involves visualization of objects and their motions
on a celestial sphere and the pictures help facilitate the process of visualization .
There is an extensive discussion of the Nakshatra system , a system of enumerating the signposts in the
sky to determine the location of the sun and the moon . We have included a table of dates which
shows the date at which an astronomical event (Vernal Equinox, Autumnal equinox, Summer solstice,
4
Winter solstice ) occurs in a particular nakshatra. This is an extremely good reference table which gives
us the date of the actual event that was mentioned in the Rig Veda and other ancient texts .
PREFACE
PROLOGUE
While astronomy is one of the oldest sciences in antiquity it does not necessarily mean that the concepts are easily
grasped, When we talk about the history of Astronomy, we need to be fully cognizant of the vocabulary and the
fundamental precepts of the geometry of the skies. This is what this chapter sets out to do. It is essentially
Astronomy 101. What makes this introduction unique is that it lays out this vocabulary in both English and
Sanskrit,the language in which most texts were written in antiquity
This chapter is decription of the nakşatra system. The origin of the Indian Nakşatra system has been a subject of
much speculation amongst Indologists in the west. Such has been the case since Sir William Jones discovered the
treasures hidden in the vast literature of the ancient Indic in the Sanskrit language. The main ingredients used by
the ancient Indic in developing an episteme for positional astronomy are the motions of the Sun and the Moon
relative to the Nakşatras. Ever since the occidental belatedly recognized the central role of Sanskrit amongst the
IE family of languages, thanks to the insatiable curiosity of Sir William Jones , there has also been the recognition
that the Nakşatra system was a unique contribution of the Indians and it is the same Sir William who recognized
immediately the significance of the Nakşatra system not merely because of their Astronomic utility but also
because they provided a clue to the antiquity of the astronomical data that the Indic had amassed.
The approach to determining the antiquity of the texts uses astronomical observations of the sky. This has not
been adequately pursued in the Occident, even though the initial work was done over a hundred years ago by
Jacobi and Tilak
CHAPTER VI THE INDIAN NATIONAL CALENDAR (INC) Error! Bookmark not defined.
5
CHAPTER VII ARCHEO-ASTRONOMY AND ASTRO-CHRONOLOGY
The main reason for writing this book is that the real story of the Indic contribution to Astronomy has yet to be told
in the text books of the west. Few books give a coherent account of the Indic odyssey as it unfolds from the mists
of antiquity to the pioneering work of Astrophysicist Chandrasekhar on the nature of the universe. If they do
mention it at all, it is merely to say that they borrowed everything from Greece or Babylon. When challenged, the
mathematician in the west will quote one of the 3 or 4 Occidental historians of Mathematics (e.g. Toomer, Van der
Waerden or David Pingree) as their authoritative source. Rarely will they mention a Primary source in Sanskrit,
because they are not familiar with the literature in Sanskrit and they do not trust the Indics to tell the true story.
They prefer to get the story from an Occidental who may not have read a single book in its Sanskrit original rather
than get it from an Indic 2 . The net result is a book filled with clichés where the content is already degraded from
multiple levels of interpretation and inadvertent filtering of the original source
This chapter strives to emphasize that Astronomy was not merely a playground for the Greeks and Babylonians,
but was a major object of study for most of the civilizations of antiquity
This is self explanatory but we wish to point out that the number and scholarship of indic savants is staggering and
that the chioice of savants to elaborate on was extremely difficult
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A GLO-PEDIA
APPENDIX B MAPS
APPENDIX E WHAT THE REST OF THE WORLD SAID ABOUT THE INDIC CONTRIBUTIONS
2
I am reminded of the Parable of the Lost Coin. This is the story of the man looking for a lost coin in a well lighted
area, when he knows he has lost it in a darker area of the garden. When asked why he was looking for it where he
certainly couldn’t find it, the man replied “But it is better lighted here and I can see what i am looking for.”-,.
Clearly the Parable of the lost coin is entirely apropos here
6
APPENDIX F ABBREVIATIONS OF RESOURCE MATERIALS
APPENDIX P INDEX
APPENDIX Q CITATIONS
As a general purpose coffee table book for those curious about the subject
The book does not assume a prior level of expertise in the field of mathematics and astronomy, although
it does require a mind capable of absorbing new concepts and an advanced Level high school
proficiency in Mathematics
7
We plan to provide supplementary material to facilitate the adoption of the book as a text
I have tried to avoid making it solely a research monograph and have tried to make it accessible to the
general reader who has knowledge of high school algebra and trigonometry. There is no question that
the book will be very valuable to researchers in the history and Philosophy of mathematics
Would this subject have international appeal outside your home country? If so,
where?
It will have wide appeal because there are several references to the work of the Greeks and the Babylonians
8
A list of the main competing books
There is currently no book that competes with this book in its totality. Some books contain some of the material but
there is no book that covers the range of material that this book covers
James Evans,History and practice of ancient astronomy Oxford University Press , 1998
Outline - A detailed outline of the book will be prepared, including the chapters being submitted for review. The
entire manuscript is available for review
Roughly how many thousand words in length will your book be?
I am currently estimating that the book will be 258,000 words long.
Approximately how many line drawings (charts, graphs, diagrams, etc. ) will you
need
20
9
Do you plan to include material requiring permission (text, music, lyrics,
illustrations)? To what extent? Have you started the permissions request
process?yes, maybe 5
Do you plan to class-test the material in your own or other sections of the
course? (Any material distributed to students should be protected by copyright
notice on the material.) at present this is not in plan , but we are considering a 5 day short
course
Kosla Vepa is a member of the Global Indic Diaspora, originally a native of Andhra Pradesh state in
India and has had the good fortune to have been brought up and have had his education in various
parts of India including, Bihar, Maharashtra, and Karnataka. He matriculated from Andhra
University in 1955. Among the schools which he has attended are St.Xaviers College, Bombay,
Karnatak University, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, and the University of Waterloo, Ontario,
Canada. His highest degree is a PhD in the area of Engineering Mechanics. His professional and
technical interests include successful research and development engineering experience in the
Information technology, aero‐engine and energy industries across the globe and an abiding interest
in the history of the Mathematical sciences in antiquity.
Currently Dr. Vepa has significant interests in a wide variety of subjects including ontological
principles in science and philosophy, Ancient Indian history, Vedas and Vedanta, Mathematical
Sciences in India during antiquity, the growth and evolution of civilizations, Geopolitics of the Indian
subcontinent, to name a few. His major activity is to further the aims and objectives of the Indic
Studies Foundation, stated in the link below and to further the progress towards an accurate
rendering of the narrative of the Story of the Civilization of the Indic peoples.
10
When he finds time he pursues his hobbies of photography and astronomy, Dr. Vepa resides in the
San Francisco Bay Area
11
PUBLICATIONS AND ESSAYS OF GENERAL INTEREST
12
in preparation
PhD Thesis
The Indic Mathematical tradition, The Hindu Renaissance, Vol.IV no. IV, pp 19
Paper presented at the HEC 2006 in Los Angeles, Ca , Nov.2006
Source Book (Anthology) of Mathematics and Astronomy from Indic Antiquity (under construction)
The story of the 3 periodicities,Astronomy, the Indian Calendar and Time, a Historical
perspective
13