Sie sind auf Seite 1von 7

John Tiedemann writ 1133:

Email: John.Tiedemann@du.edu Writing & Research


Winter 2021
Office hours: By appointment on MW 12:00–1:50 p.m.
Zoom, M and W, between 4:00–6:00 Unless otherwise announced, we’ll meet in Sturm 451 on
p.m. Other times, too. Email me to Mondays and on Zoom on Wednesdays.
make a Zoom appointment.

• writ 1133: Human Rights / Humans Write


THE CLASS
Historian Lynn Hunt argues that that the practice of literacy — i.e., of composing and interpreting
written, visual, or aural texts — is not only uniquely human; it is how we learn to be human. In this class,
we will examine literacy from a variety of angles — as expressed in art, as a historical social practice,
and as a global digital phenomenon — both to consider how reading, writing, and viewing define
our common humanity and to become more accomplished readers, writers, and researchers
ourselves.

Much of our time will be spent discussing readings and viewings together as a class, but the majority
of our time will be devoted to four writing projects:

• Essay 1: Writing Humanity: For this project, you’ll test Lynn Hunt’s thesis that literacy teaches us how
to be human by interpreting a cultural artifact.
• Essay 2: Writing into History: This project asks you to explore the significance of an episode from
your own life or the life of someone close to you by placing it in historical context.
• Essay 3: Writing the Digital City: For this project, you’ll write an ethnographic study of an online
community space.
• Essay 4: Reflections on Writing: This project asks you to consolidate what you have learned this
term about writing, reading, and research by reflecting upon your own work.

TEXTS
Copies of (or links to) all readings, viewings, will be posted on Canvas.

Your own texts are also a central element of this class — so please bring your laptop to every Zoom
meeting AND in-person class meeting.
GOALS AND FORMAT
• Goals
In WRIT 1133, students practice academic research of various kinds; rhetorical strategies for different
academic and civic audiences and purposes; and critical reading and analytic skills. By the end,
students are expected to demonstrate, through their writing, a practical knowledge of multiple
academic research traditions, the rhetorical/conventional differences among them, and the
rhetorical differences between writing for academic audiences and writing for popular audiences.
Students are also expected to demonstrate proficiency in finding, evaluating, synthesizing, critiquing,
and documenting published sources in ways appropriate to given rhetorical situations. Students will
receive sustained practice in writing, with systematic instructor feedback, resulting in at least 20
pages of revised and polished writing, in multiple assignments, as well as numerous additional
exercises, in projects requiring library-based research as well as other types.
• Class-time and homework
Some of our time will be spent discussing assigned readings and viewings, but most of our time will be
spent drafting and revising various pieces of writing, as well as providing feedback on each other’s
work. You can also expect to spend approximately four hours each week working at home, perhaps
more. Finally, because a quality piece of writing results from many revisions, you will write each of your
papers in stages and revise, with guidance from me and your classmates.
Unless otherwise announced, we’ll meet in person on Mondays (in 451 Sturm) on Mondays and on
Zoom on Wednesdays.
• Conferences
Each of you will meet with me individually for two required conferences, where we’ll discuss
strategies for revising your work. I’ll send around a sign-up sheet the week before the conferences
take place. These conferences are required and you’ll receive a grade for your preparation.
Apart from the required conferences, I’m also available to meet on Zoom between 4:00 p.m. and
6:00 p.m. on Mondays and Wednesdays. I can meet other times, too. The best way to make an
appointment is to email me or to check in after class.
POLICIES
• Participation
For each class meeting, you will receive up to five points toward your final grade: up to 2 for the
writing assignment you complete at home up to three for your participation in class discussion. All
Ø Homework: All writing assignments are to be posted on Google Drive and shared with me by the
start of class on the day they are due. A student will receive 2 points for posting a complete and
manifestly thoughtful draft of their response to the assignment. (By “manifestly thoughtful” I mean
clear, coherent, and on topic.) S/he will receive 1 point for posting a draft that is either incomplete
and/or sloppily composed. A student will receive no points should s/he fail to post and share his or
her assignment when it is due.
Ø Class discussion: A student will receive 3 points for the day when s/he makes more than one
meaningful contribution to that day’s discussion. (By a “meaningful contribution” I mean a
contribution that’s thoughtful and fully elaborated, thus moving the conversation forward and
contributing to our collective understanding of the topic under discussion). S/he will receive 2 points
when s/he contributes only once or when his/her contributions aren’t fully formed. S/he will receive
one point if she attends class without speaking up. A student will receive no points if s/he fails to
attend class, if s/he distracts his or her classmates, or if s/he wastes valuable class time by checking
email, facebook, etc., or otherwise disengaging from class.
• Attendance
As the above indicates, there are no “excused” absences from class. If you miss class, you will not
receive credit for class discussion for that day (though you can still receive credit for the day’s
homework by posting it on time).
• Late Work
Assignments are due when they are due. Assignments that come in late, that aren’t shared correctly,
or that are incorrectly labeled will not receive credit or feedback from me. To receive feedback on a
late draft, you will need to make an appointment to see me during office hours.
• Civility and Tolerance
The Writing Program affirms DU’s Code of Student Conduct (http://www.du.edu/ccs/code.html),
which in part “expects students to recognize the strength of personal differences while respecting
institutional values.” Because writing courses rely heavily on interactions between all members of the
class, students and faculty must act in a manner respectful of different positions and perspectives. A
student who behaves in an uncivil or intolerant manner will be asked to stop and/or formally repri-
manded and/or subject to action by the Office of Citizenship and Community Standards.
Becoming educated requires encountering new ideas and information, some of which may conflict
with an individual’s existing knowledge or perspectives. I expect students to engage such materials
thoughtfully, in ways that reflect the values and mission of the University of Denver.
• Plagiarism
The Writing Program follows the Council of Writing Program Administrators policy “Defining and Avoid-
ing Plagiarism,” which states, “In an instructional setting, plagiarism occurs when a writer deliberately
uses someone else’s language, ideas, or other original (not common-knowledge) material without
acknowledging its source” (http://wpacouncil.org/node/9). DU’s Honor Code also maintains that all
members of the University must responsibly use the work of others. Students who have plagiarized a
project will receive an F on that project, and the professor will inform the Director of Writing and the
Office of Community and Citizenship Standards, which may take further action. Any documented acts
of plagiarism after the first may be subject to more severe actions.
• Accommodations for Students with Disabilities
The Writing Program will provide reasonable accommodations to every student who has a disability
that has been documented by The University of Denver Disability Services Program
(http://www.du.edu/studentlife/disability/ or 303.871.2455).
• Email
I usually respond to email within a day or two during the week; I check email less often on weekends.
GRADES
I’ll give you suggestions for revision and a provisional grade on each fully drafted essay. Those grades
will rise, fall, or stay the same depending upon how effectively you revise it. All final drafts of all essays
are due to me on Canvas by noon on Friday, March 19.

In addition to the grades you receive for your essays, you will also receive a grade for your final
reflective essay, for class participation, for the work you do to prepare for required conferences with
me, and for your responses to classmates’ work. Here’s the breakdown:

Essay 1: 200 points


Essay 2: 200 points
Essay 3: 200 points
Reflective essay: 200 points
Class participation: 5 points per class x 20 = 100 points
Conference prep: 20 points per conference x 2 = 40 points
Peer responses; 20 points per response x 3 = 60 points
TOTAL 1000 points
Here’s the scale I’ll use to calculate your final grade for the course:
A 930-1000
A- 900-929
B+ 870-899
B 830-869
B- 800-829
C+ 770-799
C 730-769
C- 700-729
D+ 670-699
D 630-669
D- 600-629
F 0–599
CALENDAR
M Jan. 11 Sturm: Introduction
W Jan. 13 Zoom: Applying a concept and generating a thesis: Lynn Hunt, Inventing
Human Rights.
M Jan. 18 CLASS CANCELED FOR MLK DAY
W Jan. 20 Supporting and developing a thesis through analysis and making an argument
flow.
M Jan. 28 Telling a true story: Taylor Branch, At Canaan’s Edge, “Memphis.”
• Full draft of Essay 1 due.
W Jan. 30 Putting a story in context: selected student.
M Feb. 1 Unfolding a story’s theme: selected student writing.
W Feb. 3 Revising for style.
M Feb. 8 Conferences.
• Full draft of Essay 2 due.
W Feb. 10 Conferences.
M Feb. 15 Creating a conversation: Lewis Mumford, “What Is a City?” and Sharon Zukin,
“Whose Culture? Whose City?” (on Blackboard, in the Content folder).
W Feb.17 Generating a question. (Mumford and Zukin, cont’d.)
M Feb. 22 Conducting an interview.
W Feb. 24 Observation and participation.
M March 1 Writing an ethnography selected student writing.
W March 3 Writing an ethnography selected student writing.
M March 8 Conferences.
• Full draft of Essay 3 due.
W March 10 Conferences.
M March 15 Reflecting and revising.
M March 17 Reflecting and revising.
Final drafts of all essays due on Canvas by noon on Friday, March 19.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen