Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Project Report
On
WORKING CAPITAL ANALYSIS IN HINDUSTAN
ZINC LIMITED, UDAIPUR (RAJ.)
SUBMITTED FOR
SUBMITTED BY
DIMPLE MARDIA
(2006-07)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
DATE:-
PLACE: - UDAIPUR
(DIMPLE MARDIA)
Preface
• Research methodology
• Company profile
• Introduction
• Mgt.Structure of HZL
• Need of working capital
• Determination of working capital
• Source of working capital
• Ratio analysis
• Conclusion of the study
• Limitation of the study
• Balance sheet, P&L A/C for five year
• working capital for five year
• Bibliography
Research Methodology
OBJECTIVES:
SOURCE OF INFORMATION:
PRIMARY SOURCE.
SECONDARY SOURCE.
CHAPTER # 1
Introduction Of
HINDUSTAN
ZINC
LIMITED
INTRODUCTION
BOD
Mr. Agnivesh Agarwal : Chairman
Mr. Ajita Bajpai Pande : Director
Mr. Sujit Gulati : Director
Mr. A.C. Wadhawan : Director
Mr. N.K. Shukla : Director
Mr. Anil Agarwal : Director
Mr. Navin Agarwal : Director
Mr. K.K Kaura : Director
Mr. Tarun Jain : Director
Mr. M.S. Mehta : CEO & Whole time Director
Mr. S.L. Bajaj : Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Rajendra Pandwal : Company Secretary
Registered Office
Yashad Bhawan
Udaipur (Raj.)
313001
VEDANTA
VEDANTA RESOURCES
(Yashad Bhawan, Udaipur)
Corporate Objectives
• Harnessing natural resources in harmony with natural to enhance
economy well – being and quality of life.
• To put India on the world metals and mining map by becoming a
fortune 500 company.
• To be in the top decide in term of cost of production by 2007 across
all businesses.
• To double per capita consumption of copper, aluminum and zinc
through application development and marketing efforts by 2009.
• To explore and develop mineral reserves by 2010, for the subsequent
15 years in copper, aluminum and zinc.
• To have relentless focus on execution using best in class processes.
• To build an organization having world class capabilities and high
performance culture by attracting, developing and retaining talented
people.
• To set up CPP’S / captive sources for entire power requirement.
• To explore and develop additional mining resources.
• To build world class capabilities and high performance culture.
• To develop value added products such as CGG alloys, zinc sheets
etc.
Commissioned 1991
Location 225 km north of Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Capacity 3.7 mtpa ore
Details An open cast mine with low strip ratio 5:1 and
good mineralogy leading to higher recovery and
overall low cost of production. Onsite
concentrator to produce zinc concentrate.
Concentrate Zinc 54-54.5%, lead 63.7-67%
Certification ISO 9001:2000, ISO 14001:1996, OHSAS
18001:1996
Commissioned 1983
Location 75 km north-east of Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Capacity 1.3 mtpa ore
Details An underground mine with on site concentrator
and two vertical access shafts. Mining is done
through vertical crater retreat and blast hole
stopping. Ore is crushed before hoisting and
stockpiling for secondary and tertiary crushing.
Concentrate Zinc 51.5%, lead 51.2-52.9%
Certification ISO 9001:2000, ISO 14001:1996, OHSAS
18001:1999
Zawar Mine
Commissioned 1942
Location 40 km East of Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Capacity 1.2 mtpa ore
Details An underground mining complex consisting of
four underground mines and one concentrator
for all mines. Mining is done with sublevel
stopping with matching infrastructure. The
complex is equipped with 6 MW of captive
power generation capacity.
Concentrate Zinc 54.3-55.2%, lead 64.7-64.8%
Certification ISO 9001:2000, ISO 14001:1996, OHSAS
18001:1999.
Commissioned 1991
Location 120 km east of Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Capacity 1, 05,000 TPA of refined zinc, 35,000 TPA of refined
lead
Details A Pyro-metallurgical smelter using ISP Technology.
Main by products is Sulphuric Acid and Silver and one
of the by product is cadmium.
Capacity power coal based 155 MVV captive power plants
commissioned in 2005.
Generation
Certification ISO 9001:2000, ISO 14001:1996, OHSAS 18001:1999
Commissioned 1968
Location 12 km east of Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Capacity 80,000 TPA of refined zinc.
Details A Hydro-metallurgical smelter using RLE Technology.
Main by products is Sulphuric Acid and Cadmium. The
plant is equipped with 29 MW of captive power
generation capacity.
Certification ISO 9001:2000, ISO 14001:1996, OHSAS 18001:1999
Commissioned 1977
Location 17 km from Vishakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Capacity 56,000 TPA of refined zinc.
Details A Hydro-metallurgical smelter using RME Technology.
Main by products is Sulphuric Acid and Cadmium. The
plant obtains part of its power requirement al low cost
due to Share holding in a gas utility company in
Andhra Pradesh.
Certification ISO 9001:2000, ISO 14001:1996, OHSAS 18001:1999
HZL has an on going expansion project in these mining as well as
smelting, to raise its capacity of refined zinc to 4, 00,000 TPA.
Leading foreign venders like Lurgi, Outokumpu, ABB, Alstom and BHEL
are associated with these projects. The total capital investment by HZL on
these projects is Rs. 16,475 million.
PROJECT
HZL has undertaken expansion project (phase II) in mining as well as smelting
which has raised the capacity of refined zinc to 4,11,000 tons per annum. The
main expansion projects are:-
also completed in may 2005. The mine is now operating its full capacity is
3.75 mtpa.
Chanderiya Lead smelter: - The new 50,000 TPA AusmeltTM lead
Social Responsibilities
The concern of man kind at HZL is not limited to its boundaries, but
spills over whole country, providing the backward and tribal
populance in and around its unit in Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Bihar
and Rajasthan. The concern manifests itself in form on numerous
rural health campaigns, family welfare activities, adult education
programmes, water supply, construction of roads in rural areas;
cattle fodder camps, cyclone relief measures in Orissa and Andhra
Pradesh, earth quake relief measures in Bhuj etc.
Disinvestment
For the competitive success in the fast changing global market,
strategic partnership alliance is inevitable. The focus shall be on the
value creation within alliance. The capacity of both partners to
dynamically and creatively maneuver the alliance through a thicket
of uncertainties, changing priorities, organization fractions and
competitive surprise is of vital importance. In this background, the
Govt. of India has identified a strategic Group and divested its
majority stake.
CHAPTER # 2
DESIGN OF STUDY:
The study comprises of seven chapters in all. The first and second
chapter throws ample light on the growth and development of
industry selected. The third chapter discusses the research
methodology used for study. The fourth chapter deals in detail with
theoretical concept of the working capital management. In fifth
chapter the Ratio Analysis of HZL & sixth chapter is the Limitation of
the Company. and finally main conclusions have been drawn &
suggestion given in the last chapter, the seventh. To facilitate an
easy understanding of the chapter, the timely helps of diagrams &
charts has been taken.
CHAPTER # 3
Working
Capital
Management
It is that capital which makes the company work. Fixed assets from
the skeleton while WC is the Flash and blood. WC is also known by other
terms. Viz. circulating capital, fluctuating capital, revolving capital etc.
The peculiarity of WC is that keeps on changing continuously in course
of business operations. The assets and liabilities created during the
operating cycle are called current assets and current liabilities.
While the study of GWC indicate the nature and extant of working
capital requirements, the analysis of NWC indicates the liquidity positions
of an enterprise.
The term operating refers to the length of time necessary to complete the
following cycle of event.
Phase 2
INVENTORY
Phase 1
OPERATING CYCLE
Fig.1-- If it were possible to complete the sequences instantaneously,
there would be no need for current assets (working capital).
Since cash inflows and cash outflows do not match, firm have to
necessarily keep cash or invest in short term liquid securities.
So that will be in a position to meet obligations when they become due
similarly, firm must have adequate inventory to guard against the
possibility of not being able to meet a demand for their products.
Adequate inventory, therefore, provides a cushion against being out of
stock. If firm have to be competitive they must sell goods to their
customers on credit which necessities the holding of account receivable.
The sum total of days starting with the input of raw materials and the
selling of finish goods and the collection against sales involved in each
segment will be the “Gross Operating Cycle Period.” When the average
payment of the company to the suppliers is deducted from the gross
operating cycle period it is called the “Net Operating Cycle Period” or
simply cycle period. The shorter the duration of operating cycle period,
the faster will be the transformation of current assets into cash; as a
consequence the lesser will be the necessity of WC fund.
The average inventory of row material and store consumption cost of
production, cost of sales and the purchases are derived by dividing the
respective year-end figures by 365 days.
The total number of days against each formula is found out for (a) to (d)
which is the gross operating cycle and the total number of days against
(e) is deducted to arrive at the net operating cycle.
CURRENT ASSETS:-
The term ‘current assets’ includes assets which are acquired with the
intention of converting them into cash during the normal business of the
company.
CURRENT LIABILITIES:-
The liabilities payable within a year and out of current assets. The value
of these liabilities generally changes within one year. Long term liabilities
if matured and are to be paid in the current period and out of CA, will
become CL.
received by the business but from which payment have not been
made.
• Bank Overdraft
• Short term loan i.e. loan from bank etc. which are payable within one
CHAPTER # 4
RATIO
ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
** Liquidity Ratios:-
The terms ‘Liquidity’ and ‘Short term solvency’ are
used synonymously. Liquidity and short term solvency means ability of the
business to pay its short term liabilities. Inability to pay off short term liabilities
affects its credibility as well as its credit rating. Continuously default on a part
of the business leads to commercial bankruptcy. Eventually such commercial
bankruptcy may lead to its sickness and dissolution. Short term lenders and
creditors of the business are very much interested to know its state of liquidity
because of their financial stake.
Traditionally, two ratios are used to highlight the business ‘Liquidity’.
These are Current Ratio and Quick Ratio.
** Activity Ratio:-
The activity ratios are also called the Turnover ratios or Performance
ratio. These Ratios are employed to evaluate the efficiency with which the firm
manages and utilized its assets. These ratios usually indicate the frequency of
sales w.r.t. its assets. These assets may be capital assets or WC or average
inventory. These ratios usually calculated with reference to sales/ costs of
goods sold and are expressed in term of rate or times. Several activity ratios
are follows:-
** Profitability Ratios
The Profitability ratios measure the profitability or the operational
efficiency of the firm. These ratios reflect the final result of business
operations. The result of firm can be evaluated in term of its earning with
reference to a given level of assets or sales or owners interests etc.
Therefore, the profitability ratios are broadly classified in three categories:-
** Liquidity position –
With the help of ratio analysis one can draw conclusions regarding
liquid position of a firm. The liquidity position of a firm would be satisfactory if it
is able to meet its current obligations when they become due. A firm can be
said to have ability to meet its short term liabilities if it has sufficient liquid
funds to pay the interest on its short maturity debt usually within a year as well
the principal. This ability is reflected in the liquidity ratio of the firm. The
liquidity ratios are particularly useful in credit analysis by bank and other
supplier of short term loans.
** Operating efficiency –
Ratio analysis through light on the degree of efficiency in the
management and utilization of its assets. The various activity ratios measure
this kind of operational efficiency. In fact, the solvency of a firm is, in the
ultimate analysis, department upon the sales revenues generated by the use
of its assets total as well as its component.
** Overall Profitability –
Unlike the out side parties which are interested in one aspects of
the financial position of the firm, the management is constantly concern about
the overall profitability of the enterprises. That is, they are concerned about
the ability of the firm to meet its short term as well as long term obligation to its
creditors, to ensure a reasonable return to its owner and secure optimum
utilization of the assets of the firm. This is possible if an integrated view is
taken and all the ratios are considered together.
OBJECTIVE
SAMPLE
Total Debt
Debt Equity Ratio =
Share’s holder’s equity
GRAPH: 1
0.25
0.2
0.15
Debt equity
0.1 ratio
0.05
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
YEAR
Interpretation:-
GRAPH: 2
0.5
0.4
0.3
ROTA
0.2
0.1
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
YEAR
Interpretation:-
Net Profit
Return on total assets =
Fixed Assets
GRAPH: 3
YEAR
Interpretation:-
Return on fixed assets is highest in 2006. In 2005 it was low due to high
proportion of fixed assets. In 2006 net profit has increased so return on fixed
assets has also increased.
Return on Investment: -
The profitability ratio can also be relating the profits of a firm to its total
capital employed. Return on investment can be calculated by the following
formula:-
Net Profit
Return on investment =
Capital Employed
GRAPH: 4
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
ROI
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
YEAR
Interpretation:-
Current ratio
This ratio measures the solvency of the company in the short term. This
can be calculated by using the following formula:-
GRAPH: 5
CURRENT RATIO
3
2.5
1.5 CURRENT
RATIOo
1
0.5
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
YEAR
Interpretation
There are not many changes in CR but as compared to 2005 CR has
increased with higher rate in 2006. It is due to increase in sundry debtors. The
company’s CR in 2006 is 2.17 which are higher than ideal (2:1) due to pilling
up of inventory.
Liquid Ratio
GRAPH: 6
LIQUID RATIO
2.5
1.5
LIQUID
1
RATIO
0.5
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
YEAR
Interpretation:-
In 2002 it was high that was 2.13. It was due to increase in sundry
debtors and bank balance in short deposits. At the same time current liabilities
also reduced in the form of tax provision.
Again in 2003 at the time disinvestment liquid ratio had to 1.44 due to
increase in current liabilities mainly in provision for dividend.
GRAPH: 7
6
WCTO
4
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
YEAR
Interpretation:-
Net profit ratio reflects net profit margin on the total sales after deducting
all expenses but before deducting interest and taxation. This ratio measured
the efficiency of operational of the company. This can be calculated by the
following formula:-
Net Profit
Net profit ratio = x 100
Sales
GRAPH: 8
40
30
NPO
20
10
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
YEAR
Interpretation:-
The net profit has increase with higher rate after disinvestment as
compared to before it. The net profit ratio was 6.40% which was lowest but in
2006 it is 41% which is highest.
Table: 9
YEAR EARNING PER
SHARE
2002 1.61
2003 3.36
2004 9.58
2005 15.51
2006 34.85
GRAPH: 9
EARNING PER SHARE
35
30
25
20
15 EPS
10
5
0
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
YEAR
Interpretation:-
CHAPTER # 5
The current ratio maintains at a level of 2.17 times and the acid test ratio
has fallen to 0.22 times in 2006, which is less then the normal level.
The cash and the bank balance have reduced tremendously and the
creditors have increased. At the same time the sundry debtors have also
decrease.
There has been a tremendous increase in the profitability of the
company. The net profits in 2006 have shown a good increase.
Sales have increased by 214% in 2006 as compared to 2002 i.e. after
disinvestment.
PAT available for appropriation has increased to roaring and
tremendous height in 2006 i.e. 1915% as compared to 2002
Return on capital employed and return on share holder equity has
shown continuous improvement as compared to the previous year. The
EPS was 1.61 in 2002 which has increased to 34.85 in 2006.
After disinvestment co. has paid off most of its loan.
Thus the overall position and the performance of the company are very
good. From shareholder point of view, their investments are quit safe and they
are likely to get more and more benefits in the future. The short terms as well
as the long term lenders of loan funds are also very safe. The company’s
future is very bright.
CHAPTER # 6
Limitations of the study
Every project work has its limitations further, a work in social sciences
and commerce can not be like that of any natural science where results are
universally true.
In the absence of universally accepted norms, interpretations of results
often become a matter of judgment uniformity and the present study is not an
exception to do it. Despite my best endeavor to maintain uniformity and
maximum converge.
CHAPTER # 7
WORKING CAPITAL
AS AT THE END OF FINANCIAL YEAR
(Rs. In million)
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06
TOTAL(A)
2450.69 3254.41 4274.15 4158.10
B- CURRENT 338.03 1004.13 843.13 1873.70
LIABILITIES & ---- ---- ----
43.31
PROVISION ---- ---- ----
161.49
Sundry Creditors
Provisions-Dividend 2993.52 4258.54 5117.28 6031.80
Corporate Dividend tax
Provision towards
Contingencies 3378.80 5861.89 1058.06 5439.70
C- WORKING CAPITAL(A-B)
D-INCREASE / DECREASE
IN WC
BIBLIOGRAPHY
READINGS:-
1. S.N Maheshawari: Cost & Management Accounting: Sultan
Chand & Sons, New Delhi
2. M.Y.Khan & P.K.Jain: Management Accounting; Tata McGraw
Hill Publishing Co. Ltd., New Delhi.
3. I.M.Pandey: Management Accounting Vikas Publishing (P)
LTD., New Delhi.
4. N.K. Agarwal: Cost Accounting; Shuchita Prakashan (p) Ltd.
Allah bad.
REFERENCES:-
NEWSPAPERS: