Science Facts on the RH Bill
The world’s leading scientific experts resolve the issues on the Reproductive Health Bill, the forced distribution of
birth control devices by all private employers and by the government using Filipino taxpayer’s money.
1. The pill and the IUD kill children.
When does human life begin? At fertilization, when the
sperm penetrates the egg. This was the “overwhelming
agreement in countless scientific writings”, and of top experts
(including scientists from Harvard Medical School and the
Mayo Clinic) at an eight day hearing of the US Senate.1
Do birth control pills and the IUD kill the young human
being? Yes, aside from preventing fertilization, the pill also
works to kill a young human if ever a sperm gets to penetrate
the egg, according to the scientific journal of the American
Medical Association.2 The American Journal of Obstetrics and
Gynecology of 2005 pronounced that the intrauterine device
brings about the “destruction of the early embryo.”3
2. The pill injures women’s health.
Is the pill safe? The International Agency for Research on
Cancer in a 2007 study made by 21 scientists reported that
the pill causes cancer, giving it the highest level of
carcinogenicity, the same as cigarettes and asbestos.4 It also
causes stroke,5 and significantly increases the risk of heart
attacks.6 Several scientific journals have stated that the
natural way of regulating births through the Billings Ovulation
Method has no side-effects, and is 99.5 % effective.7
3. More condoms promote the spread of
AIDS.
Will the use of condoms lower the rate of HIV/AIDS in
a country? It will increase it, according to the “best studies”,
concluded Harvard Director for AIDS Prevention, Edward C.
Green. Availability of condoms makes people they take
wilder sexual risks, thus worsening the spread of the disease.
1
Subcommittee Report, S-158, 97th Congress, 1st Session 1981, 7.
2
Larimore and Stanford (2000). "Postfertilization effects of oral contraceptives and their
relationship to informed consent" Arch Fam Med 9 (2): 126–33.
3
Stanford and Mikolajczyk (2005). "Mechanisms of action of intrauterine devices: Update
and estimation of postfertilization effects". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
(W.B. Saunders Comp) 187: 1699–1708.
4 Green (2003) Rethinking AIDS Prevention. Praeger.
"Combined Estrogen-Progestogen Contraceptives" IARC Monographs on the Evaluation
of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans 91. 2007.
5 United States", Quarterly Journal of Economics (The MIT Press) 111 (2): 277–317; Akerlof,
Kemmeren, et al. (2002). "Risk of Arterial Thrombosis in Relation to Oral Contraceptives
(RATIO) Study: Oral Contraceptives and the Risk of Ischemic Stroke". Stroke (American
Heart Association, Inc.) 33: 1202–1208.
6 Bloom, Canning, Sevilla, “The Demographic Dividend: A New Perspective on the
Baillargeon, McClish, Essah, and Nestler (2005). "Association between the Current Use of
Low-Dose Oral Contraceptives and Cardiovascular Arterial Disease: A Meta-Analysis".
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (The Endocrine Society) 90 (7): 3863–3870.
7
British Medical Journal, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lancet,
Contraception, Fertility and Sterility.
He showed that fidelity and abstinence are the best solutions
to the AIDS epidemic. 8
4. Wide use of contraceptives leads to the
destruction of families, and other great social
evils.
Will the greater availability of contraception improve
the conditions of families? Wide contraceptive use leads
to more premarital sex, more fatherless children, more single
mothers, more poverty, more abortions; and also a decline of
marriage, less domesticated men, more crimes, more social
pathology and poverty, according to the studies of Nobel
prize winner, George Akerlof.9 Many other studies reached
the same conclusion.
5. The RH Bills are based on wrong
economics.
Is there a correlation between population growth and
economic development? “No clear association” is the
answer of Simon Kuznets, Nobel Prize winner in the science
of economics.10 Many later studies confirmed this, including a
2003 study of the RAND Corporation, a world leader in
research associated with 30 Nobel Prize winners.11
Is population control one of the ingredients for high
economic growth and poverty reduction? No,
population control is not among the five solutions or
ingredients found by the 2008 Commission on Growth and
Development headed by Nobel prize winner Michael Spence.
The growth factors are: good governance, openness to
knowledge, stable finances, market allocation, investment
and savings.12 Our country loses 400 billion pesos to
corruption every year.13
Help dispel ignorance of these science facts. Beware of
the wealthy and powerful pro-RH lobby. Make copies
and pass on to many, including our leaders. TODAY!
8
9
Akerlof, Yellent and Katz (1996), "An Analysis on Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing in the
“Men Without Children,” The Economic Journal 108 (1998)
10
Kuznets (1974) Population Capital and Growth, Norton.
11
Economic Consequences of Population Change,” RAND Corporation, 2003, 17.
12
The Growth Commission (2008) The Growth Report: Strategies for Sustained Growth
and Inclusive Development, World Bank Publication.
13
Studies of the Asian Development Bank and World Bank