Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
This Form replaces all other appraisal forms in the Public Service Institutions. It is intended to meet the requirements of the
performance management system and development process.
1. This Form must be filled by all employees in the Public Service Institutions. For principal officers and above, at the
end of the year, once fully completed, the original should be sent to the Permanent Secretary (Establishments),
duplicate to the respective Head of organisation and triplicate to the public servant concerned. All other employees
(senior officers and below) original copy should be sent to the Chief Executive Officer of the organization, duplicate
to the parent ministry of the specific cadre and the triplicate to the public servant concerned.
2. Where appropriate, each box shall carry only one letter or figure. Letters to be in capitals.
3. Personal/Agreed objectives are derived from the Organisation’s work plan (Strategic plan, Annual operating plans or
Action plans) and are expected to be implemented in the current year.
4. Sections 2, 3 and 4 of this Form shall be filled by the Appraisee in consultation with the Supervisor and sections 5-6
in the presence of a third party if necessary.
5. Please note that appraisals that are rated as 1 are the best performers and appraisals rated as 5 are the worst
performers. These should be brought to the attention of top management and usually to the attention of the Chief
Executive Officer of their respective Organisation.
1
No..of D D M M Y Y Y Y
Months
Terms of Service PERMANENT
AND
PENSIONABL
E
2
SECTION 2: PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT
2.1 2.2 Agreed Objectives 2.3 Agreed Performance 2.4 Agreed 2.5 Agreed
S/N Targets Performance Criteria Resources
1 i. 25 a. To Reports COMPUTER
ISO TIME
CAG' carr
INTOSAI FUNDS
s y ISACA HUMAN RESOURCE
Annu out
al qual
2 ii. Gen
Infor ity
mati
on
Tech
nolo
3 iii. gy
10 IT
IT
Audit
s
Con
duct
4 iv. ed
10
Spec
ial
Audit
s
5 i. Con
Internatio
nal Fora
Organize
d by
INTOSAI
,
Date………………………….. Date…………………………
3
SECTION 3: MID-YEAR REVIEW (30TH DECEMBER 2020..................)
To be filled by the Appraissee in Consultation with the Supervisor
3.1 S/N 3.2 Agreed Objectives 3.3 Progress Towards 3.4 Factors Affecting
(As per Section 2) Target Performance
1 v. 25 CAG's I conducted quality control
Annual review and clearance for
General five Agencies
Audits
Reports
Prepared
and
4
SECTION 4: REVISED OBJECTIVES (if any)
4.1 S/N 4.2 Agreed Revised 4.3 Agreed 4.4 Agreed Performance 4.5 Agreed
Objective(s) Performance Targets Criteria Resources
1 Web development
project to automate
review process
2 Automation tool to
format reports to
follow style guides
Date………………………….. Date…………………………
5
SECTION 5: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW & APPRAISAL (30th JUNE 2021
To be filled by the Appraisee and the Supervisor
5.1 5.2 Agreed Objective(s) 5.3 Progress made 5.4 Rated Mark
S/N App- Super Agreed
raisee visor Mark
3 2 2
3 2 2
2 3 3
2 2 2
4 3 3
3 3 3
Overall Performance Mark: This should reflect the overall performance and 2.83 2.5 2.5
achievement of agreed objectives in Section 5.
Rating:
1 = Outstanding performance 2 = Performance above average 3 = Average performance
4 = Poor performance 5 = Very poor performance
6
SECTION 6: ATTRIBUTES OF GOOD PERFORMANCE
To be filled by the Appraisee and the Supervisor
6.1 6.2 MAIN FACTORS 6.3 QUALITY ATTRIBUTE 6.4 RATED MARK
S/N Appraisee Supervisor Agreed
Mark
Ability to work in team 1 1
1 WORKING
RELATIONSHIPS Ability to get on with other staff 2 1
Ability to gain respect from others 2 2
Ability to express in writing 2 3
Rating:
7
SECTION 7: OVERALL PERFORMANCE (AVERAGE OF SECTIONS 5 & 6)
The supervisor will recommend the most appropriate reward, developmental measures or sanctions against the
appraisee in accordance to the level of agreed performance targets.