Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
TAXATION LAW
VALUE-ADDED TAX
MARVIN PATRICIO CAÑERO
Attorney-at-Law
Certified Public Accountant
Law Professor and Bar Reviewer in Taxation
Former Revenue Attorney – Bureau of Internal Revenue
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 1 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 2
Constitutional Issues:
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 3 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 4
1
12/1/20
ØTo begin with, it is not the law — but the revenue bill — which is ØThere is no undue delegation of legislative power when the President
required by the Constitution to "originate exclusively" in the House of was given the stand-byauthority to raise the VAT rate from 10% to 12%
Representatives. In fact, a bill originating in the House may undergo when a certain condition is met. It is simply a delegation of
such extensive changes in the Senate that the result may be a rewriting ascertainment of facts upon which enforcement and administration of
of the whole. What the Constitution simply means is that the initiative the increase rate under the law is contingent. No discretion would be
for filing revenue bills must come from the HOR. (Tolentino vs. SOF) exercised by the President. It is the ministerial duty of the President to
immediately impose the 12% rate upon the existence of any of the
conditions specified by Congress. (Abakada Guro vs. Ermita)
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 5 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 6
ØIndirect Tax
ØNo VAT shall be imposed to form part of the cost of goods destined for
consumption outside the territorial border of the Philippine taxing ØUniform Tax
authority. ØBroad-Based Tax on Consumption
ØPrivilege Tax
ØConversely, those goods destined for use or consumption and services ØPhilippines adopted the “separate indication of tax” method
to be rendered within the Philippines shall be subject to the 12% VAT ØCollected Through the Tax Credit Method
pursuant to the “Destination Principle” (CIR vs. Toshiba Information
Equipment [Phils.], Inc., 2005)
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 7 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 8
2
12/1/20
ØAn entity can credit against or subtract from the VAT charged on its ØAny person who, in the course of his trade or business, sells, barters,
sales or outputs the VAT paid on its purchases, inputs and imports. exchanges or leases goods or properties, or renders services, and any
(ABAKADA Guro Party List vs. Ermita, 1 September 2005) person who imports goods,
ØIf at the end of a taxable period, the output taxes are equal to the input ØIn case of importation, the importer is liable, whether or not made in
taxes, no payment is required. It is when the output taxes exceed the the course of his trade or business; if the imported goods are
input taxes that the excess has to be paid. If however, the input taxes subsequent sold/transfers by tax-exempt persons to non-exempt
exceed the output taxes, the excess shall be carried over to the persons, the latter shall be considered the importers and shall be liable
succeeding quarter or quarters or may be claimed for tax refund or tax for VAT due on the importation.
credit certfiicates as may be allowed under the law. (CIR v. Seagate
Technology (Philippines February 11, 2005)
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 9 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 10
ØThe subject sale is not vatable because sale of the vessels was not in
Øthe regular conduct or pursuit of a commercial or economic activity, the ordinary course of trade or business of NDC. The phrase"course
including transactions incidental thereto, by any person regardless of
of business" or "doing business" connotes regularity of activity. In
whether or not the person engaged therein is a non-stock, non-profit the instant case, the sale was an isolated transaction. The sale which
private organization (irrespective of the disposition of its net income
was involuntary and made pursuant to the declared policy of
and whether or not it sells exclusively to members or their guests), or Government for privatization could no longer be repeated or carried
government entity. (Section 105, NIRC) on with regularity. It should be emphasized that the normal VAT-
registered activity of NDC is leasing personal property”.
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 11 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 12
3
12/1/20
Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management Corporation Vs. CIR, July 3, 2019
Association of Non-Profit Clubs, Inc. vs. BIR,. June26, 2019
ØVAT is ultimately a tax on consumption, and it is levied onl y on the sale, barter
or exchange of goods or services by persons who engage in such activities, in ØIt is a basic principle that before a transaction is imposed VAT, a sale,
the course of trade or business. barter or exchange of goods or properties, or sale of a service is
required.
ØThe sale of the power pla nts by PSALM is not subject to VAT since the sale ØMembership fees, assessment dues, and the like are not subject to
was made pursuant to PSALM's mandate to privatize NPC's assets, and was VAT because in collecting such fees, the club is not selling its service
not undertaken in the course of tra de or business; it is not in pursuit of a to the members. Conversely, the members are not buying services
commercial or economic activity but a governmental function mandated by from the club when dues are paid; hence, there is no economic or
law to privatize NPC generation assets. commercial activity to speak of as these dues are devoted for the
operations/maintenanceof thefacilities of the organization. As such,
ØSince the lease of Naga Complex and col lection of income and receivables are there could be no "sale, barter or exchange of goods or properties, or
within PSALM's powers necessary to discharge its mandate unde r the law sale of a service" to speak of, which would then be subject to VAT.
and likewise undertaken in the exercise of PSALM's governmental function,
these activities are likewise notATTY. MARVIN
subject to
P. CAN VAT.
ERO, CPA 13 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 14
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 15 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 16
4
12/1/20
BAR: In June 2013, DDD Corp., a domestic corporation engaged in the 1) Transfer, use or consumption not in the course of business of goods
business of leasing real properties in the Philippines, entered into a lease or properties originally intended for sale or for use in the course of
agreement of a residential house and lot with EEE, Inc., a non-resident business.
foreign corporation. Theresidential house and lot will be used by officials 2) Distribution or transfer to: (a) shareholders or investors share in the
of EEE, Inc. during their visit to the Philippines. The lease agreement was profits of VAT-registered person; (b) creditors in payment of debt or
signed by representatives from DDD Corp. and EEE, Inc. in Singapore. obligation.
DDD Corp. did not subject the said lease to VAT believing that it was not a
domestic service contract. Was DDD Corp. correct? Explain. 3) Consignment of goods if actual sale is not made within 60 days
following the date such goods was consigned.
4) Retirement from or cessation of business, with respect to inventories
of taxable goods existing as of such retirement or cessation
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 17 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 18
A. Export sales
ØA zero-rated sale of goods or properties/sale of service (by a VAT- 1. Actual export of goods;
registered person) is a taxable transaction for VAT purposes, but shall
2. The sale of raw materials or packaging materials to a non-resident
not result in any output tax. However, the input tax on purchases of buyer for delivery to a resident local export-oriented enterprise;
goods, properties or services, related to such zero-rated sale, shall be
available as tax credit or refund. 3. The sale of raw materials or packaging materials to an export-
oriented enterprise;
4. Export sales under OIC and other special laws;
5. The sale of goods, supplies, equipment and fuel to persons
engaged in international shipping or air transport operations.
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 19 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 20
5
12/1/20
6
12/1/20
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 25 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 26
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 27 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 28
7
12/1/20
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 29 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 30
Melissa inherited from her father a 1,000-square-meter lot. At the time of Lease of Residential Units Not Subject to VAT:
her father's death on March 14, 1995, the property was valued at
P720,000.00. On February 28, 2018, to defray the cost of the medical 1. Monthly Threshold: with a monthly rental per unit not exceeding
expenses of her sick son, she sold the lot for P2,600,000.00, on cash basis. P15,000.00 regardless of the amount of aggregate rentals received by
The prevailing market value of the property at the time of the sale was the lessor during the year;
P3,000.00 per square meter. Is Melissa liable to pay VAT on the sale of
the property? If so, how much and why? If not, why not?
2. Annual Threshold: lease of residential units where the monthly rental
per unit exceeds P15,000.00 but the aggregate of such rentals of the
lessor during the year do not exceed P3, 000,000.00;
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 31 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 32
8
12/1/20
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 33 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 34
CREDITABLE INPUT TAX: Tax Refund of Unutilized Input VAT– Sec 112
Transitional Input Tax Presumptive Input Tax 1.A VAT-registered person whose sales of goods, properties or services
1. Creditable against the output tax; 1. Creditable against the output tax; are zero-rated or effectively zero-rated may apply for the issuance of
2. TPs who became VAT-registered 2. Persons or firms engaged in the a tax credit certificate/refund of input tax attributable to such sales.
persons upon exceeding the processing of sardines, mackerel,
annual threshold, or who and milk, and in manufacturing 2. A VAT-registered person whose registration has been cancelled due
voluntarily register even if their refined sugar, cooking oil to retirement from or cessation of business, or due to changes in or
turnover does not exceed the cessation of status under Sec. 106 (C) of the Tax Code may, within two
annual threshold; (2) years from the date of cancellation, apply for the issuance of a tax
3. 4% of the gross value in money of
3. 2% of the value of the beginning purchases of primary agricultural credit certificate or refund if he has no internal revenue tax liabilities
inventory on hand or actual VAT products which are used as inputs against which the tax credit certificate may be utilized.
paid, whichever is higher to their production
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 35 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 36
9
12/1/20
Tax refund of unutilized Input VAT arising from zero-rated or effectively Amendments under the Train Law: ( 90/30)
zero-rated transactions:
1. The CIR shall grant a refund for creditable input taxes within 90 days
The Two-Year Prescriptive Period: from the date of submission of the official receipts or invoices and
other documents in support of the application;
a. It is only the administrative claim that must be filed within the 2. Should the CIR find that the grant of refund is not proper, the CIR
2-year period. must state in writing the legal and factual basis for the denial.
b. The proper reckoning date for the 2-year period is the close of 3. In case of full or partial denial of the claim for tax refund, the taxpayer
the taxable quarter when the relevant sales were made. affected may, within 30 days from the receipt of the decision denying
c. The only other rule is the Atlas ruling (from filing of return and the claim, appeal the decision with the CTA:
payment), which applied only from 8 June 2007 to 12
4. Failure on the part of any official, agent, or employee of the BIR to act
September 2008.
on the application within the 90-day period shall be punishable under
Section 269 of the Tax Code.
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 37 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 38
Period Covered Date Filed • Failure to indicate “VAT-exempt sale” for a VAT-exempt transaction: the issuer
1st Quarter of 2018 31 March 2019 shall be liable for VAT.
2nd Quarter of 2018 30 May 2019
3 and 4th Quarters of 2018
rd 15 July 2019
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 39 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 40
10
12/1/20
üThe Supreme Court has consistently rule d on the de nial of a claim for refund
or tax credit whenever the word “zero-rated” has been omitted on the
invoices or sale receipts of the taxpayer-claimant (Eastern Telecommunications
Philippines, Inc. vs. CIR,; Northern Mindanao Power Corporation vs. CIR)
THANK YOU!
üSection 113 of the Tax Code and the Consol idated Value-Added Tax Regulations
of 2005 does not create a presumption that non-imprintment of the word "zero
rated" deems the transaction subject to 12 %VAT. Thus, in this case, failure to
comply with invoicing re quirement s as mandated by law does not deem the
transaction subject to 12% VAT. (CIR V. Euro-philippines Airline Services, Inc.)
ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 41 ATTY. MARVIN P. CAN ERO, CPA 42
11