DATE SUBIECȚI

Descriptive Statistics: Vârstă (ani); BMI (kg/m^2)

Statistics
Variable Fumător N N* Mean StDev Variance CoefVar Minimum Q1 Median
Vârstă (ani) N 21 0 22,667 3,246 10,533 14,32 18,000 20,000 22,000
  Y 15 0 23,67 5,55 30,81 23,45 18,00 21,00 23,00
                     
BMI (kg/m^2) N 21 0 21,687 2,998 8,986 13,82 17,147 19,709 21,259
  Y 15 0 22,430 3,202 10,255 14,28 16,652 20,453 21,514

Variable Fumător Q3 Maximum

Vârstă (ani) N 26,000 30,000

  Y 25,00 41,00

       

BMI (kg/m^2) N 22,650 31,020

  Y 25,128 28,555
DATE SUBIECȚI

Two-Sample T-Test and CI: S-Temperatura(°C); F-Temperatura(°C)

Method
μ₁: population mean of S-Temperatura(°C)
µ₂: population mean of F-Temperatura(°C)
Difference: μ₁ - µ₂

Equal variances are assumed for this analysis.

Descriptive Statistics
Sample N Mean StDev SE Mean
S-Temperatura(°C) 36 36,392 0,195 0,032
F-Temperatura(°C) 34 36,332 0,200 0,034
Estimation for Difference
95% CI for
Difference Pooled StDev Difference
0,0593 0,1971 (-0,0347; 0,1534)
Test
Null hypothesis H₀: μ₁ - µ₂ = 0
Alternative hypothesis H₁: μ₁ - µ₂ ≠ 0

T-Value DF P-Value
1,26 68 0,213
DATE SUBIECȚI

Two-Sample T-Test and CI: S-Temperatura(°C); F-Temperatura(°C)

Method
μ₁: population mean of S-Temperatura(°C)
µ₂: population mean of F-Temperatura(°C)
Difference: μ₁ - µ₂

Equal variances are assumed for this analysis.

Descriptive Statistics
Sample N Mean StDev SE Mean
S-Temperatura(°C) 36 36,392 0,195 0,032
F-Temperatura(°C) 34 36,332 0,200 0,034
Estimation for Difference
95% CI for
Difference Pooled StDev Difference
0,0593 0,1971 (-0,0347; 0,1534)
Test
Null hypothesis H₀: μ₁ - µ₂ = 0
Alternative hypothesis H₁: μ₁ - µ₂ ≠ 0

T-Value DF P-Value
1,26 68 0,213

DATE SUBIECȚI

Test and CI for Two Variances: S-Temperatura(°C); W-

Temperatura(°C)

Method
σ₁: standard deviation of S-Temperatura(°C)
σ₂: standard deviation of W-Temperatura(°C)
Ratio: σ₁/σ₂
F method was used. This method is accurate for normal data only.
Descriptive Statistics
Variable N StDev Variance 95% CI for σ
S-Temperatura(°C) 36 0,195 0,038 (0,158; 0,254)
W-Temperatura(°C) 33 0,264 0,070 (0,212; 0,349)
Ratio of Standard Deviations
Estimated 95% CI for Ratio
Ratio using F
0,738497 (0,522; 1,040)
Test
Null hypothesis H₀: σ₁ / σ₂ = 1

Alternative hypothesis H₁: σ₁ / σ₂ ≠ 1

Significance level α = 0,05

Test
Method Statistic DF1 DF2 P-Value
F 0,55 35 32 0,082

DATE SUBIECȚI

Test and CI for Two Variances: S-Temperatura(°C); F-

Temperatura(°C)

Method
σ₁: standard deviation of S-Temperatura(°C)
σ₂: standard deviation of F-Temperatura(°C)
Ratio: σ₁/σ₂
F method was used. This method is accurate for normal data only.
Descriptive Statistics
Variable N StDev Variance 95% CI for σ
S-Temperatura(°C) 36 0,195 0,038 (0,158; 0,254)
F-Temperatura(°C) 34 0,200 0,040 (0,161; 0,263)
Ratio of Standard Deviations
 Estimated 95% CI for Ratio
Ratio using F
0,975831 (0,692; 1,371)
Test
Null hypothesis H₀: σ₁ / σ₂ = 1

Alternative hypothesis H₁: σ₁ / σ₂ ≠ 1

Significance level α = 0,05

Test
Method Statistic DF1 DF2 P-Value
F 0,95 35 33 0,885

DATE SUBIECȚI

One-way ANOVA: S-Temperatura(°C); W-Temperatura(°C); F-

Temperatura(°C)

Method
Null hypothesis All means are equal
Alternative hypothesis Not all means are equal
Significance level α = 0,05
Rows unused 5

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information
 Factor Levels Values
Factor 3 S-Temperatura(°C); W-Temperatura(°C); F-Temperatura(°C)
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Factor 2 0,08992 0,04496 0,92 0,400
Error 100 4,86737 0,04867    
Total 102 4,95728      
Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
0,220621 1,81% 0,00% 0,00%
Means
Factor N Mean StDev 95% CI
S-Temperatura(°C) 36 36,3917 0,1948 (36,3187; 36,4646)
W-Temperatura(°C) 33 36,3273 0,2637 (36,2511; 36,4035)
F-Temperatura(°C) 34 36,3324 0,1996 (36,2573; 36,4074)

Pooled StDev = 0,220621

Fisher Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Fisher LSD Method and 95% Confidence
Factor N Mean Grouping
S-Temperatura(°C) 36 36,3917 A
F-Temperatura(°C) 34 36,3324 A
W-Temperatura(°C) 33 36,3273 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

DATE SUBIECȚI

One-Way ANOVA for S-Temperatur; W-Temperatur; F-Temperatur

DATE SUBIECȚI

One-way ANOVA: S-TD; W-TD; F-TD

Method
Null hypothesis All means are equal
Alternative hypothesis Not all means are equal
Significance level α = 0,05
Rows unused 5

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information
Factor Levels Values
Factor 3 S-TD; W-TD; F-TD
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Factor 2 78,18 39,09 0,40 0,669
Error 100 9682,75 96,83    
Total 102 9760,93      
Model Summary
 S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
9,84010 0,80% 0,00% 0,00%
Means
Factor N Mean StDev 95% CI
S-TD 36 78,86 9,02 (75,61; 82,11)
W-TD 33 76,76 10,77 (73,36; 80,16)
F-TD 34 77,56 9,72 (74,21; 80,91)

Pooled StDev = 9,84010

Fisher Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Fisher LSD Method and 95% Confidence
Factor N Mean Grouping
S-TD 36 78,86 A
F-TD 34 77,56 A
W-TD 33 76,76 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

DATE SUBIECȚI

One-way ANOVA: S-Puls; W-Puls; F-Puls

Method
Null hypothesis All means are equal
Alternative hypothesis Not all means are equal
Significance level α = 0,05
Rows unused 5

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information
Factor Levels Values
Factor 3 S-Puls; W-Puls; F-Puls
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Factor 2 352,9 176,46 2,69 0,073
Error 100 6570,5 65,71    
Total 102 6923,5      
Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
8,10588 5,10% 3,20% 0,00%
Means
 Factor N Mean StDev 95% CI
S-Puls 36 72,56 8,25 (69,88; 75,24)
W-Puls 33 70,06 7,09 (67,26; 72,86)
F-Puls 34 74,65 8,84 (71,89; 77,41)

Pooled StDev = 8,10588

Fisher Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Fisher LSD Method and 95% Confidence
Factor N Mean Grouping
F-Puls 34 74,65 A  
S-Puls 36 72,56 A B
W-Puls 33 70,06   B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

DATE SUBIECȚI

One-way ANOVA: S-Puls; W-Puls; F-Puls

Method
Null hypothesis All means are equal
Alternative hypothesis Not all means are equal
Significance level α = 0,05
Rows unused 5

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information
Factor Levels Values
Factor 3 S-Puls; W-Puls; F-Puls
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Factor 2 352,9 176,46 2,69 0,073
Error 100 6570,5 65,71    
Total 102 6923,5      
Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
8,10588 5,10% 3,20% 0,00%
Means
 Factor N Mean StDev 95% CI
S-Puls 36 72,56 8,25 (69,88; 75,24)
W-Puls 33 70,06 7,09 (67,26; 72,86)
F-Puls 34 74,65 8,84 (71,89; 77,41)

Pooled StDev = 8,10588

Fisher Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Fisher LSD Method and 95% Confidence
Factor N Mean Grouping
F-Puls 34 74,65 A  
S-Puls 36 72,56 A B
W-Puls 33 70,06   B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

DATE LABORATOR

Test and CI for Two Variances: CREATININA vs PERIOADA

Method
σ₁: standard deviation of CREATININA when PERIOADA = F
σ₂: standard deviation of CREATININA when PERIOADA = S
Ratio: σ₁/σ₂
F method was used. This method is accurate for normal data only.
Descriptive Statistics
PERIOADA N StDev Variance 95% CI for σ
F 25 0,081 0,007 (0,063; 0,113)
S 30 0,091 0,008 (0,072; 0,122)
Ratio of Standard Deviations
Estimated 95% CI for Ratio
Ratio using F
0,895520 (0,610; 1,334)
Test
Null hypothesis H₀: σ₁ / σ₂ = 1

Alternative hypothesis H₁: σ₁ / σ₂ ≠ 1

Significance level α = 0,05

 Test
Method Statistic DF1 DF2 P-Value
F 0,80 24 29 0,585

DATE LABORATOR

Two-Sample T-Test and CI: CREATININA; PERIOADA

Method
μ₁: population mean of CREATININA when PERIOADA = F
µ₂: population mean of CREATININA when PERIOADA = S
Difference: μ₁ - µ₂

Equal variances are assumed for this analysis.

Descriptive Statistics: CREATININA

PERIOADA N Mean StDev SE Mean
F 25 1,0080 0,0812 0,016
S 30 1,0267 0,0907 0,017
Estimation for Difference
95% CI for
Difference Pooled StDev Difference
-0,0187 0,0866 (-0,0657; 0,0283)
Test
Null hypothesis H₀: μ₁ - µ₂ = 0
Alternative hypothesis H₁: μ₁ - µ₂ ≠ 0
 T-Value DF P-Value
-0,80 53 0,429

DATE LABORATOR

One-way ANOVA: CREATININA versus PERIOADA

Method
Null hypothesis All means are equal
Alternative hypothesis Not all means are equal
Significance level α = 0,05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information
Factor Levels Values
PERIOADA 2 F; S
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
PERIOADA 1 0,004752 0,004752 0,63 0,429
Error 53 0,397067 0,007492    
Total 54 0,401818      
Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
0,0865553 1,18% 0,00% 0,00%
Means
PERIOADA N Mean StDev 95% CI
F 25 1,0080 0,0812 (0,9733; 1,0427)
S 30 1,0267 0,0907 (0,9950; 1,0584)

Pooled StDev = 0,0865553

Fisher Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Fisher LSD Method and 95% Confidence
PERIOADA N Mean Grouping
S 30 1,0267 A
F 25 1,0080 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

DATE LABORATOR

Test and CI for Two Variances: URIC ACID vs PERIOADA

Method
σ₁: standard deviation of URIC ACID when PERIOADA = F
σ₂: standard deviation of URIC ACID when PERIOADA = S
Ratio: σ₁/σ₂
The Bonett and Levene's methods are valid for any continuous distribution.
Descriptive Statistics
PERIOADA N StDev Variance 95% CI for σ²
F 25 1,612 2,599 (0,620; 12,832)
S 30 0,983 0,967 (0,583; 1,835)
Ratio of Variances
Estimated 95% CI for Ratio 95% CI for Ratio
Ratio using Bonett using Levene
2,68775 (0,200; 7,950) (0,243; 4,554)
Test
Null hypothesis H₀: σ₁² / σ₂² = 1

Alternative hypothesis H₁: σ₁² / σ₂² ≠ 1

Significance level α = 0,05

Test
Method Statistic DF1 DF2 P-Value
Bonett * 0,323
Levene 0,21 1 53 0,648

DATE LABORATOR

Two-Sample T-Test and CI: URIC ACID; PERIOADA

Method
μ₁: population mean of URIC ACID when PERIOADA = F
µ₂: population mean of URIC ACID when PERIOADA = S
Difference: μ₁ - µ₂

Equal variances are assumed for this analysis.

Descriptive Statistics: URIC ACID

PERIOADA N Mean StDev SE Mean
F 25 5,97 1,61 0,32
S 30 5,417 0,983 0,18
Estimation for Difference
95% CI for
Difference Pooled StDev Difference
0,551 1,306 (-0,158; 1,261)
Test
Null hypothesis H₀: μ₁ - µ₂ = 0
Alternative hypothesis H₁: μ₁ - µ₂ ≠ 0

T-Value DF P-Value
1,56 53 0,125

DATE LABORATOR

One-way ANOVA: URIC ACID versus PERIOADA

Method
Null hypothesis All means are equal
Alternative hypothesis Not all means are equal
Significance level α = 0,05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information
Factor Levels Values
PERIOADA 2 F; S
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
PERIOADA 1 4,145 4,145 2,43 0,125
Error 53 90,416 1,706    
Total 54 94,561      
Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
1,30613 4,38% 2,58% 0,00%
Means
 PERIOADA N Mean StDev 95% CI
F 25 5,968 1,612 (5,444; 6,492)
S 30 5,417 0,983 (4,938; 5,895)

Pooled StDev = 1,30613

Fisher Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Fisher LSD Method and 95% Confidence
PERIOADA N Mean Grouping
F 25 5,968 A
S 30 5,417 A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.