Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Learn from each other, value discussion, creativity, newideas
Good final product (strategic plan)
Respect personality types - get to know other types, check in with each other, playing devil's advocate
Listening to each other, safe environment
Responsible and responsive to each other, disciplined
"
Bridging Communities/
Collaborating Communication Creativity Curious
Open to new ideas/
Flexible Organizing/ planning Relationship-building Uncover meaning
! ' (
Our team͛s profiles show a remarkable degree of similarity on a number of measures, pointing to some
measure of smooth sailing in terms of our working styles, but also the potential to miss opportunities or
sometimes both of the Self-Transcendence values, Universalism and Benevolence. Three of us also
included Self-Direction, indicating an openness to change. One trended the other direction, toward the
Conservation values.
Our general agreement on the Self-Transcendence values may help us quickly come to a trusting and
functional group dynamic, as we agree on our fundamental motivations. Susann͛s Conservation values
could serve as an important balance to our team͛s general excitement over new ideas and innovation.
The team should plan to use Susann͛s Conservation focus to check out new ideas and possibly serve to
Our team as a whole highly identifies with the Social, Conventional and Artistic interests; most of us
choose at least two of these interests, although in different places. This could indicate that we will
approach our work together using similar strategies and tools, and could broaden our own ability to
work within these interests by seeing how other team members use them practically. In a nonprofit
Only two other interests were represented: Investigative (Rachel and Christena), and Enterprising
(Susann). The Investigative interests might be a nice balance with the Artistic and Conventional
interests, helping us dig in to understand new ideas or systems. Susann͛s uniqueEnterprising interest
might help her be effective in the group as a ͞persuader.͟ This interest might also keep her from feeling
and preserve smooth working relationships, including: communication, collaboration, helping others
and relationship-building. Our team also has skills that will help us find areas of agreement, including:
bridging communities, flexible, curiosity and uncovering meaning. Finally, a couple of people mentioned
research and organization as strong skills that will help our group keep on track in a practical way.
The danger in this skill set might be, in fact, too much flexibility, or too much emphasis on preserving
relationships as opposed to finding the best solution. We will need to be vigilant about voicing concerns
and conflicting ideas. Having someone play the role of devil͛s advocate might be a smart strategy as we
examine new ideas. Disciplining ourselves to talk through new ideas in a very practical way might also
Again, we show remarkable congruence in our personality types, including all four of us scoring Intuition
and Feeling. From this, we can assume the group may approach analysis and decision-making in similar
ways, by looking for patterns and connecting with values. With three Introverts, we͛ll need to build in
plenty of time for reflection but prompt ourselves to speak up when meeting together. We are evenly
balanced between Judging and Perceiving; we have talked about how to ensure we keep a framework
and end goal in mind while allowing opportunity for ͞messy͟ process.
We all seek harmony and points of agreement in our work, which might lead us to ignore conflict or
sweep it under the table ʹ either interpersonal conflict, or conflicting ideas. We also all look more to
patterns, innovation and meaning than to tasks and data. There will be a danger that we will overlook
c *
In terms of Thomas &Kilmann͛s operating principles, our group will tend to value concern for
relationships higher than concern for outcome ʹ or perhaps simply not recognize when one is trumping
the other. Our team members will be eager to offer creative and innovative ideas, but we might trend
toward Accomodation when deciding how to move forward, reluctant to be seen as challenging
someone else. Our task will be to find respectful and safe ways to explore our different ideas, especially
in a short timeframe, without Withdrawing. Setting some ground rules for dialogue, and holding
ourselves and each other to high expectations for performance, may help.
With so much similarity, understanding our underlying mental models and how they influence our work
together might be difficult. Luckily, our team assignment is Senge͛s The Fifth Discipline, which deals
explicitly with how to surface and influence mental models in a work environment. Understanding how
our profiles might lead us to ignore differences is a good foundation for this work. I look forward to