Yurok seek land for a tribal park on the North Coast

The tribe wants the transfer of thousands of acres of public land, and hopes to purchase
timber land, to create a site that could include water taxis, gift shops and eco-lodges.

Steve Chaney, superintendent of Redwood National Park, walks along the Flint Ridge Trail in a 1,200-acre parcel that the
Yurok tribe is hoping to acquire for a tribal park. (Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times / December 7, 2010)

By Julie Cart, Los Angeles Times

December 26, 2010
Reporting from Redwood National Park

California's largest tribe has set its sights on obtaining a 1,200-acre slice of Redwood National
Park, part of an ambitious plan to cobble together a new tribal park that could add eco-lodges,
gift shops and water taxis into backcountry along the Klamath River.

The Yurok Tribe envisions that its park would be managed as part of the chain of national and
state parks that necklace the Redwood Coast from Mendocino County to the Oregon border,
some of the most spectacular and contested landscapes in California.

The Yurok have lived along this rugged coast for centuries, although the tribe has lost much of
its land base since its reservation was established in 1855. Tribal leaders see their aspirations to
gain land as nothing less than essential nation-building, and are seeking congressional approval
for the transfer of thousands of acres of public land from the park service, forest service and the
Bureau of Land Management. The tribe also wants a boundary expansion.

Although Yurok officials emphasize that all park projects will adhere to the highest
environmental and cultural standards, they have been reluctant to provide much detail about how
the system they dub the "Redwood National State and Yurok Tribal Park" might operate. The
current arrangement between the state and national parks that share some responsibilities is itself
unusual; there is no precedent for a similar agreement including a tribe.

Among those who want more information is Steve Chaney, superintendent of Redwood National
Park. He maintains that it could be difficult to integrate federal and state park management
policies with the Yurok's vision, which the tribe has yet to reveal publicly.

"At this point, we don't have a huge amount of information to react to, no idea what they plan,"
Cheney said. Pointing to an office shelf groaning with multi-volume federal land management
guidelines, he added, "We've got a litany of things that tell me how resources are managed. Co-
management has been talked about a lot but not defined. It's a buzz word."

The Yurok reservation's boundaries were reestablished in 1988 through the Hoopa-Yurok
Settlement Act and overlap with the national park at the mouth of the Klamath River. The
overlap — a slice of foggy coastal land — is what proposed legislation would transfer to the
tribe. The transfer was originally included in the 1988 Act but was eventually taken out by
senators who called the proposal too controversial.

The tribe is asking Rep. Mike Thompson (D-St. Helena) to introduce legislation that would
transfer 1,200 acres of a woody knob of Redwood Park and 1,200 acres of redwood stands in the
Six Rivers National Forest to the tribe. The Yurok are also seeking control of Redding Rock, an
offshore sea stack that is part of the California Coastal National Monument.

The Yurok's master plan would create a national scenic highway and a national marine
sanctuary. But it is the national park land from Redwood that is creating the most concern. For
this area, at least, the Yurok are willing to spell out guidelines for their proposed tribal park.

The National Park Service transfer lands "will be managed in accordance with NPS policies,"
said tribal chairman Troy Fletcher. "For land that we purchase ourselves, we will manage as we
see fit. Why is it for anyone else to define?"

Fletcher, a tireless campaigner for the Yurok, said the tribe's unorthodox gambit to join with the
state and national parks is making waves because it's "blurring the lines. We are into cutting-
edge stuff. If you read the general management plan for the park, their goal is to manage the land
the way it was 150 years ago. Guess who was managing the land 150 years ago."

Thompson has not signed off on the wording of the bill, saying in a statement, "The Yurok tribe
has been great to work with but there remains more work to do before any legislation will be
ready to be introduced."

An early draft of the proposed legislation authorized a $50-million allocation to the Yurok to
purchase 47,000 acres of commercial timber land. The tribe later withdrew the provision, saying
that the appropriation was politically untenable and that the Yurok leadership never signed off on
it.

But the tribe has other resources to which it can turn. The Yurok's seven-year land-acquisition
project is driven by a sophisticated campaign that has yielded million of dollars in loans and
grants from federal, state and private sources. The Western Rivers Conservancy is helping the
Yurok raise the estimated $73 million required to purchase the timber land. Earlier this month
the state water board awarded the tribe an $18.7 million loan to purchase a portion of the timber
property.

Some ideas of how a tribal park might work were set out by the tribe's well-connected
consultant, Destry Jarvis, who had a long park service career. He is the brother of Jon Jarvis, the
service's national director. Destry Jarvis' 2005 tribal park plan envisioned an array of possible
activities such as water taxis and Yurok-guided trail hikes. The unspoiled Blue Creek watershed
is a critical component of the park, according to the plan, and is part of the yet-to-be purchased
commercial timber property.

Yurok leaders met with the National Park Service's regional director and representatives of
conservation groups last week, but those organizations have been surprisingly mum on the topic.
The venerable Save the Redwoods League, which was among the groups that waged a 60-year
battle to protect the state's big trees, declined to comment on the Yurok's plans.

Ron Sundergill, senior director for the National Parks Conservation Assn., a parks advocacy
group, said that although he'd like to see more details about the Yurok's vision for a tribal park
before the group can endorse the legislation, he is confident of the tribe's direction.

"I think their environmental ethic is quite strong," he said. " I'm hopeful that it will be what
really drives them."

Conservation groups spent decades fighting to preserve the state's redwood forests against
unrestrained timber harvesting and successfully campaigned to set aside stands of the tall trees in
a swath of state and national parks that follow California's far northern coast. The remote but
beloved park lands have an international following.

To Janine Blaeloch, director of Western Lands Project, which monitors the privatization of
federal land, the moral issue of restitution for tribal lands taken away factors into any decision to
give the Yurok the Redwood property. But, she said, "on the other hand, if what you care about
is keeping public land public, this takes that away. I don't like to see that muddled. You and I and
everyone else gets to have a say in how these lands are managed.

"Public lands is an ideal that is under constant attack and constantly has to be defended," she
added. "The thing I would worry about is this is the first shoe dropping, and what happens next?
It could definitely set a precedent."

julie.cart@latimes.com

Copyright © 2010, Los Angeles Times