Sie sind auf Seite 1von 37

Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 1 of 37 PageID# 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

CAMBRIA COMPANY LLC,

Plaintiff,
1:21-cv-143
Case No. _________
v.

HIRSCH GLASS CORP., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED


d/b/a SPECTRUM QUARTZ,

Defendant.

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Plaintiff Cambria Company LLC alleges as follows for its claims of patent infringement

against Defendant Hirsch Glass Corp., doing business as Spectrum Quartz:

NATURE OF THE ACTION

1. This is a civil action arising under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C.

§ 1 et seq., including specifically 35 U.S.C. § 271, based on Defendant’s willful infringement of

U.S. Patent Nos. 9,718,303 (the “’303 Patent”), 9,993,942 (the “’942 Patent”), and 10,300,626 (the

“’626 Patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Utility Patents”), and U.S. Patent Nos. D712,670 (the

“D’670 Patent”), D737,577 (the “D’577 Patent”), D750,905 (the “D’905 Patent”), D780,332 (the

“D’332 Patent”), and D780,333 (the “D’333 Patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Design Patents,”

and, together with the Asserted Utility Patents, the “Asserted Patents”) by the unauthorized

manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, and/or importation of Defendant’s infringing products

accused herein.

1
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 2 of 37 PageID# 2

THE PARTIES

2. Plaintiff Cambria Company LLC (“Cambria”) is a limited liability company

organized under the laws of Minnesota and having its principal place of business at 805 Enterprise

Drive East, Suite H, Belle Plaine, Minnesota 56011.

3. On information and belief, Defendant Hirsch Glass Corp. (“Hirsch Glass”) is a New

Jersey domestic partnership doing business as Spectrum Quartz, with a principal place of business

at 115 Melrich Road, Suite 2, Cranbury, New Jersey 08512, and a physical office space at 3920

Stonecroft Boulevard, Suite J, Chantilly, Virginia 20151. On information and belief, Hirsch Glass

became registered to do business in the Commonwealth of Virginia, with an Entity ID number of

F2044198, on or around November 21, 2016.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

4. This Complaint includes claims for patent infringement arising under the patent

laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. This Court has subject matter

jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).

5. Hirsch Glass is subject to personal jurisdiction due to its contacts with the

Commonwealth of Virginia, and in particular, with the Eastern District of Virginia. On

information and belief, individually or in concert with others, Hirsch Glass manufactures, imports,

distributes, markets, sells, and offers to sell products, including quartz surface products, under the

brand name Spectrum Quartz for distribution and sale in this District.

6. Hirsch Glass maintains a website that markets Spectrum Quartz branded products

throughout the United States, including in this District. See http://www.spectrumquartz.com/.

7. On information and belief, Hirsch Glass also sells Spectrum Quartz branded

products to independently owned fabricators, kitchen and bath retailers, and other dealers and

2
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 3 of 37 PageID# 3

retailers throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia, and in particular, in the Eastern District of

Virginia. See http://www.spectrumquartz.com/dealers/. For example, the Spectrum Quartz

website identifies at least the following locations for “Where to Buy” Spectrum Quartz products

within this District: one store in Alexandria, Virginia; three stores in Ashburn, Virginia; eight

stores in Chantilly, Virginia; nine stores in Fairfax, Virginia; one store in Falls Church, Virginia;

two stores in Leesburg, Virginia; one store in Purcelville, Virginia; and seven stores in Sterling,

Virginia.

8. On information and belief, Hirsch Glass operates a physical office and facility at

3920 Stonecroft Boulevard, Suite J, Chantilly, Virginia 20151, from which it markets and

distributes Spectrum Quartz branded products in this District.

9. Hirsch Glass is further subject to personal jurisdiction in this District because it has

committed one or more acts of patent infringement within this District.

10. Venue is proper in this judicial District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(b)

because Hirsch Glass has committed acts of infringement in this judicial District where the

infringing products can be found and because Hirsch Glass has a regular and established physical

place of business in this judicial District.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

11. Cambria is an industry leader in the design and manufacture of natural quartz

surface products. Cambria’s quartz surface products have a variety of uses in homes and

businesses, including, but not limited to, countertops, floor tiles, vanities, fireplace surrounds, wet

bars, and showers.

3
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 4 of 37 PageID# 4

12. Cambria earned its reputation as a leader in the industry through years of innovation

and a steadfast commitment to high quality in the design and manufacture of its products. Cambria

was the first and only U.S. producer of quartz surface products for many years.

13. Quartz surface products have multiple performance benefits over other surface

products. For example, quartz surfaces never have to be sealed, unlike granite, marble and other

surfaces that require regular maintenance. Quartz surfaces are also scratch and stain resistant,

nonabsorbent, and do not harbor harmful bacteria.

14. Cambria led the charge to grow the demand for quartz surface products by investing

millions of dollars in research and development, which led to Cambria commercializing quartz

product designs that have revolutionized the market.

15. In 2011, Cambria changed the quartz countertop industry when it introduced its

Waterstone Collection, which featured new designs capturing the colors and complex patterns

reflective of the movement seen in quarried stones like marble and granite. Cambria expanded the

Waterstone Collection in 2012, including with Cambria’s Bradshaw design, and again in 2014,

including with Cambria’s Berwyn design.

16. In 2015, Cambria again revolutionized the industry with its Brittanicca and Ella

designs as part of its Marble Collection. These designs were followed shortly by Cambria’s

Oakmoor and Roxwell designs as part of its Oceanic Collection. In 2017, Cambria expanded its

Marble Collection with its Annicca, Clareanne, Queen Anne, Brittanicca Gold, Brittanicca Warm,

Delgatie, and Ironsbridge designs. In 2018, Cambria introduced its Levven, Mersey, Skara Brae,

Bentley, Clairidge, and Golden Dragon designs. In 2020, Cambria introduced its Clovelly,

Gladstone, and Portrush designs.

4
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 5 of 37 PageID# 5

17. Following the success of Cambria’s innovative quartz surface products, Hirsch

Glass began marketing imitation copies of Cambria’s products using Cambria’s proprietary

designs and technology.

18. For example, Hirsch Glass introduced its Carefree design, which was made to

imitate Cambria’s original Bradshaw design:

Cambria Bradshaw Spectrum Quartz Carefree


(covered by D’670 Patent)

19. Similarly, Hirsch Glass introduced its Poise Light design, which was made to

imitate Cambria’s original Berwyn design:

Cambria Berwyn Spectrum Poise Light


(covered by D’577 Patent)

5
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 6 of 37 PageID# 6

20. Further, Hirsch Glass introduced its Symphony design, which was made to imitate

Cambria’s original Roxwell design:

Cambria Roxwell Spectrum Symphony


(covered by D’905 and D’333 Patents)

21. Hirsch Glass continued to expand its infringing activities in 2018. On or around

January 9–11, 2018, Hirsch Glass displayed slabs at The Kitchen & Bath Industry Show (KBIS)

including its Spectrum Quartz branded Summit, Snowdrift, and Salt Flats designs. Hirsch Glass’s

Summit design, for example, was made to imitate Cambria’s original Brittanicca design:

Cambria Brittanicca Spectrum Quartz Summit


(covered by D’332 Patent)

22. In addition to the designs discussed above, Hirsch Glass began marketing designs

called Arctic, White Sands, Salt Flats, Snowdrift, Snowpack, Tundra, Glacial, Mirage, Pinnacle,

6
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 7 of 37 PageID# 7

Elevation, Sierra, Cirrus, and Sahara, which were also designed to imitate Cambria’s innovative

products using Cambria’s proprietary technology, as described in further detail below.

CAMBRIA’S ASSERTED PATENTS

23. The ’303 Patent, titled “Processed Slabs, and Systems and Methods Related

Thereto,” was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on August

1, 2017, and names Jon Louis Grzeskowiak, II and Martin E. Davis as the inventors. The ’303

Patent claims priority to U.S. Patent Application No. 14/463,494, filed on August 19, 2014, which

is the effective filing date of the ’303 Patent. A true and correct copy of the ’303 Patent is attached

hereto as Exhibit A.

24. Cambria owns all substantial rights, titles, and interests in and to the ’303 Patent,

including the exclusive right and standing to bring suit with respect to any past, present, and future

infringement. The ’303 Patent is valid, enforceable, and in full force and effect.

25. The following Cambria products are marked with the ’303 Patent in accordance

with 35 U.S.C. § 287: Annicca, Bentley, Brittanicca, Brittanicca Gold, Brittanicca Warm,

Clairidge, Clareanne, Clovelly, Delgatie, Ella, Gladstone, Golden Dragon, Ironsbridge, Levven,

Mersey, Oakmoor, Portrush, Queen Anne, Roxwell, and Skara Brae. Cambria marks the ’303

Patent number on slab labels and sample labels.

26. The ’942 Patent, titled “Processed Slabs, and Systems and Methods Related

Thereto,” was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on June

12, 2018, and names Jon Louis Grzeskowiak, II and Martin E. Davis as the inventors. The ’942

Patent claims priority to U.S. Patent Application No. 14/463,494, filed on August 19, 2014, which

is the effective filing date of the ’942 Patent. A true and correct copy of the ’942 Patent is attached

hereto as Exhibit B.

7
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 8 of 37 PageID# 8

27. Cambria owns all substantial rights, titles, and interests in and to the ’942 Patent,

including the exclusive right and standing to bring suit with respect to any past, present, and future

infringement. The ’942 Patent is valid, enforceable, and in full force and effect.

28. The following Cambria products are marked with the ’942 Patent in accordance

with 35 U.S.C. § 287: Annicca, Bentley, Brittanicca, Brittanicca Gold, Brittanicca Warm,

Clairidge, Clareanne, Clovelly, Delgatie, Ella, Gladstone, Golden Dragon, Ironsbridge, Levven,

Mersey, Oakmoor, Portrush, Queen Anne, Roxwell, and Skara Brae. Cambria marks the ’942

Patent number on slab labels and sample labels.

29. The ’626 Patent, titled “Synthetic Molded Slabs, and Systems and Methods Related

Thereto,” was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on May

28, 2019, and names Jon Louis Grzeskowiak, II and Martin E. Davis as the inventors. The ’626

Patent claims priority to U.S. Patent Application No. 14/463,494, filed on August 19, 2014, which

is the effective filing date of the ’626 Patent. A true and correct copy of the ’626 Patent is attached

hereto as Exhibit C.

30. Cambria owns all substantial rights, titles, and interests in and to the ’626 Patent,

including the exclusive right and standing to bring suit with respect to any past, present, and future

infringement. The ’626 Patent is valid, enforceable, and in full force and effect.

31. The following Cambria products are marked with the ’626 Patent in accordance

with 35 U.S.C. § 287: Annicca, Bentley, Brittanicca, Brittanicca Gold, Brittanicca Warm,

Clairidge, Clareanne, Clovelly, Delgatie, Ella, Gladstone, Golden Dragon, Ironsbridge, Levven,

Mersey, Oakmoor, Portrush, Queen Anne, Roxwell, and Skara Brae. Cambria marks the ’626

Patent number on slab labels and sample labels.

8
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 9 of 37 PageID# 9

32. The D’670 Patent, titled “Portion of a Slab,” was duly and legally issued by the

United States Patent and Trademark Office on September 9, 2014, and names Jon Louis

Grzeskowiak, Summer Lane Kath, and Martin E. Davis as the inventors. The application that

issued as the D’670 Patent was filed on March 15, 2013. A true and correct copy of the D’670

Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit D.

33. Cambria owns all substantial rights, titles, and interests in and to the D’670 Patent,

including the exclusive right and standing to bring suit with respect to any past, present, and future

infringement. The D’670 Patent is valid, enforceable, and in full force and effect.

34. Cambria’s Bradshaw product is marked with the D’670 Patent in accordance with

35 U.S.C. § 287. Cambria marks the D’670 Patent number on slab labels and sample labels.

35. The D’577 Patent, titled “Portion of a Slab,” was duly and legally issued by the

United States Patent and Trademark Office on September 1, 2015, and names Martin E. Davis,

Jon Louis Grzeskowiak, II, and Summer Lane Kath as the inventors. The application that issued

as the D’577 Patent was filed on September 12, 2014. A true and correct copy of the D’577 Patent

is attached hereto as Exhibit E.

36. Cambria owns all substantial rights, titles, and interests in and to the D’577 Patent,

including the exclusive right and standing to bring suit with respect to any past, present, and future

infringement. The D’577 Patent is valid, enforceable, and in full force and effect.

37. Cambria’s Berwyn product is marked with the D’577 Patent in accordance with 35

U.S.C. § 287. Cambria marks the D’577 Patent number on slab labels and sample labels.

38. The D’905 Patent, titled “Portion of a Slab,” was duly and legally issued by the

United States Patent and Trademark Office on March 8, 2016, and names Martin E. Davis, Jon

Louis Grzeskowiak, II, and Summer Lane Kath as the inventors. The application that issued as

9
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 10 of 37 PageID# 10

the D’905 Patent was filed on January 16, 2015. A true and correct copy of the D’905 Patent is

attached hereto as Exhibit F.

39. Cambria owns all substantial rights, titles, and interests in and to the D’905 Patent,

including the exclusive right and standing to bring suit with respect to any past, present, and future

infringement. The D’905 Patent is valid, enforceable, and in full force and effect.

40. Cambria’s Roxwell product is marked with the D’905 Patent in accordance with 35

U.S.C. § 287. Cambria marks the D’905 Patent number on slab labels and sample labels.

41. The D’332 Patent, titled “Slab,” was duly and legally issued by the United States

Patent and Trademark Office on February 28, 2017, and names Martin E. Davis, Jon Louis

Grzeskowiak, II, and Summer Lane Kath as the inventors. The application that issued as the D’332

Patent was filed on August 3, 2015. A true and correct copy of the D’332 Patent is attached hereto

as Exhibit G.

42. Cambria’s Brittanicca product is marked with the D’332 Patent in accordance with

35 U.S.C. § 287. Cambria marks the D’332 Patent number on slab labels and sample labels.

43. Cambria owns all substantial rights, titles, and interests in and to the D’332 Patent,

including the exclusive right and standing to bring suit with respect to any past, present, and future

infringement. The D’332 Patent is valid, enforceable, and in full force and effect.

44. The D’333 Patent, titled “Slab,” was duly and legally issued by the United States

Patent and Trademark Office on February 28, 2017, and names Martin E. Davis, Jon Louis

Grzeskowiak, II, and Summer Lane Kath as the inventors. The application that issued as the D’333

Patent was filed on August 3, 2015. A true and correct copy of the D’333 Patent is attached hereto

as Exhibit H.

10
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 11 of 37 PageID# 11

45. Cambria’s Roxwell product is marked with the D’333 Patent in accordance with 35

U.S.C. § 287. Cambria marks the D’333 Patent number on slab labels and sample labels.

46. Cambria owns all substantial rights, titles, and interests in and to the D’333 Patent,

including the exclusive right and standing to bring suit with respect to any past, present, and future

infringement. The D’333 Patent is valid, enforceable, and in full force and effect.

DEFENDANT’S ACTIVITIES

47. As described below, Hirsch Glass makes, uses, imports, distributes, supplies,

markets, offers for sale, and/or sells Spectrum Quartz branded products that infringe one or more

claims of the ’303 Patent and the ’626 Patent, including but not limited to the Summit, Snowdrift,

Arctic, Salt Flats, White Sands, Snowpack, Tundra, Glacial, Mirage, Pinnacle, Elevation, Sierra,

Cirrus, Sahara, and Symphony products pictured below (collectively, the “Utility Patent Accused

Products”). See, e.g., http://www.spectrumquartz.com/quartz/designs/. Further, as described

below, Hirsch Glass’s process for making the Utility Patent Accused Products infringes one or

more claims of the ’942 Patent.

Summit Snowdrift Arctic

11
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 12 of 37 PageID# 12

Salt Flats White Sands Snowpack

Tundra Glacial Mirage

Pinnacle Elevation Sierra

12
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 13 of 37 PageID# 13

Cirrus Sahara Symphony

48. On information and belief, additional Utility Patent Accused Products that Hirsch

Glass makes, uses, imports, distributes, supplies, markets, offers for sale, and/or sells are arranged

similarly, or in different arrangements that meet one or more claims of the ’303 Patent and the

’626 Patent, and for which the process of manufacture meets one or more claims of the ’942 Patent.

49. As described below, Hirsch Glass makes, uses, imports, distributes, supplies,

markets, offers for sale, and/or sells Spectrum Quartz branded products that infringe the D’670

Patent, including at least Hirsch Glass’s Carefree product (pictured below); the D’577 Patent,

including at least Hirsch Glass’s Poise Light product (pictured below); the D’905 Patent, including

at least Hirsch Glass’s Symphony product (pictured above); the D’332 Patent, including at least

Hirsch Glass’s Summit and Pinnacle products (pictured above); and the D’333 Patent, including

at least Hirsch Glass’s Symphony product (pictured above) (collectively, the “Design Patent

Accused Products”).

13
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 14 of 37 PageID# 14

Carefree Poise Light

50. As discussed above, Hirsch Glass is providing or has previously provided the

Utility Patent Accused Products and the Design Patent Accused Products from a number of

locations in the United States, including locations in this District and through its nationwide

website. See http://www.spectrumquartz.com/dealers/.

51. In addition, Hirsch Glass has filed patent applications that appropriate Cambria’s

earlier-filed patented technology and confirm Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the Asserted Utility

Patents. For example, on September 25, 2014—more than a month after Cambria filed the patent

application to which the Asserted Utility Patents claim priority—Hirsch Glass’s President, Alex

Xie, filed U.S. Patent Application No. 14/469,249, which issued as U.S. Patent No. 9,511,516 (the

“’516 Patent”). The ’516 Patent is entitled “Method and Apparatus for Manufacturing Quartz

Slab.” On information and belief, the ’516 Patent discloses aspects of the Utility Patent Accused

Products and the process for manufacturing them. A true and correct copy of the ’516 Patent is

attached hereto as Exhibit I.

52. On December 26, 2017—more than three years after Cambria filed the patent

application to which the Asserted Utility Patents claim priority—Mr. Xie filed U.S. Patent

Application No. 15/854,519, which issued as U.S. Patent No. 10,035,733 (the “’733 Patent”). The

14
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 15 of 37 PageID# 15

’733 Patent is entitled “Method and Apparatus for Manufacturing Quartz Slab.” On information

and belief, the ’733 Patent discloses aspects of the Utility Patent Accused Products and the process

for manufacturing them. The ’733 Patent purports to incorporate the ’516 Patent by reference.

See ’733 Patent at 5:34–35, 6:11–12. A true and correct copy of the ’733 Patent is attached hereto

as Exhibit J.

53. According to assignment database records available on the U.S. Patent and

Trademark Office’s public website, the ’516 Patent and the ’733 Patent are each assigned to SQIP,

LLC, as recorded at reel/frame 055004/0903. On information and belief, “SQIP” stands for

“Spectrum Quartz Intellectual Property.”

54. As detailed further below, Mr. Xie’s ’516 Patent and ’733 Patent provide additional

evidence that the Utility Patent Accused Products infringe Cambria’s ’303 Patent and ’942 Patent,

and that the process for manufacturing the Utility Patent Accused Products infringes Cambria’s

’626 Patent.

55. Cambria has not authorized Hirsch Glass to copy, reproduce, manufacture,

duplicate, disseminate, distribute, import, sell, offer for sale, or display any quartz surface products

produced with the technology claimed by any of the Asserted Utility Patents.

56. Cambria has not authorized Hirsch Glass to copy, reproduce, manufacture,

duplicate, disseminate, distribute, import, sell, offer for sale, or display any quartz surface products

produced with the designs claimed by any of the Asserted Design Patents.

57. On or about December 26, 2017, the ’303 Patent was listed in an Information

Disclosure Statement for U.S. Patent Application No. 15/854,519, which was filed by, and names

as the sole inventor, the President of Hirsch Glass, Mr. Xie. A true and correct copy of Mr. Xie’s

Information Disclosure Statement listing the ’303 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit K.

15
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 16 of 37 PageID# 16

58. In addition to the constructive notice provided by Cambria’s patent markings and

the actual notice apparent from Mr. Xie’s Information Disclosure Statement, Cambria provided

actual written notice to Hirsch Glass of its infringement of the ’303 Patent and the D’332 Patent

on February 6, 2018. A true and correct copy of Cambria’s letter providing actual written notice

to Hirsch Glass of its infringement is attached as Exhibit L.

59. In addition to the constructive notice provided by Cambria’s patent markings,

Hirsch Glass is and has been aware of the ’942 Patent, the ’626 Patent, the D’670 Patent, the D’577

Patent, the D’905 Patent, and the D’333 Patent since at least the filing of this lawsuit.

60. Despite Hirsch Glass’s knowledge of the Asserted Patents, Hirsch Glass continues

to willfully violate Cambria’s intellectual property rights by infringing the Asserted Patents.

COUNT I – INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’303 PATENT

61. Cambria incorporates by reference and realleges, as if fully set forth herein,

paragraphs 1–60 of this Complaint.

62. As described below, in violation of at least 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), Hirsch Glass

infringes and/or has infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, at least claim 1 of the

’303 Patent by importing, making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Accused Utility Patent

Products without a license or permission from Cambria, including in this judicial District.

63. Claim 1 of the ’303 Patent recites as follows:

1. A processed slab, comprising: a major surface at least 2 feet wide by at least


6 feet long and extending perpendicularly to a slab thickness, the major surface
having at least a first pigmented vein extending generally lengthwise from edge-to-
edge that separates at least second and third pigmented veins extending generally
lengthwise and positioned on opposing sides of the first pigmented vein, wherein
the first pigmented vein is defined by a first particulate mineral mix and at least the
first particulate mineral mix is separated from and forms a substantially unmixed
layer with respect to a second particulate mineral mix defining the second
pigmented vein according to a predefined layer pattern such that each of the first
and second pigmented veins has a vein thickness equal to and parallel to the slab
16
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 17 of 37 PageID# 17

thickness, the second particulate mineral mix being different than the first
particulate mineral mix.

64. On information and belief, the Accused Utility Patent Products are processed slabs,

comprising a major surface at least 2 feet wide by at least 6 feet long and extending perpendicularly

to a slab thickness. Specifically, Hirsch Glass markets each of the Accused Utility Patent Products

as being slabs that are each 63 inches (5.25 feet) wide and 120 inches (10 feet) long. 1 Moreover,

Mr. Xie’s ’733 Patent states that “a processed slab[] may be provided which may include a major

surface at least two feet wide by at least six feet long and extending perpendicularly to a slab

thickness.” ’733 Patent at 2:26–29; see also id. at 6:28–31.

65. On information and belief, the major surface of each Accused Utility Patent

Product has at least a first pigmented vein extending generally lengthwise from edge-to-edge that

separates at least second and third pigmented veins extending generally lengthwise and positioned

on opposing sides of the first pigmented vein. This is shown by the pictures of each Accused

Utility Patent Product available on Hirsch Glass’s website. See supra note 1. Moreover, Mr. Xie’s

’733 Patent states that “the processed slab includes at least one vein of a combination of materials;

1
See, e.g., http://www.spectrumquartz.com/products/summit/#slab
http://www.spectrumquartz.com/products/snowdrift/#slab
http://www.spectrumquartz.com/products/arctic/#slab
http://www.spectrumquartz.com/products/salt-flats/#slab
http://www.spectrumquartz.com/products/white-sands/#slab
http://www.spectrumquartz.com/products/snowpack/#slab
http://www.spectrumquartz.com/products/tundra/#slab
http://www.spectrumquartz.com/products/glacial/#slab
http://www.spectrumquartz.com/products/mirage/#slab
http://www.spectrumquartz.com/products/pinnacle/#slab
http://www.spectrumquartz.com/products/elevation/#slab
http://www.spectrumquartz.com/products/sierra/#slab
http://www.spectrumquartz.com/products/sahara/#slab
http://www.spectrumquartz.com/products/bliss/qm8467-slab-view-md/
17
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 18 of 37 PageID# 18

wherein the at least one vein extends generally lengthwise from a first edge of the processed slab

to an opposing second edge.” ’733 Patent at 2:29–32; see also, e.g., id. at 6:31–35, Figs. 3, 5, 7.

Further, Mr. Xie’s ’516 Patent states that “[q]uartz and resin mixtures of different colors or

compositions can be dropped to produce a pattern or veining,” and “[t]his pattern or veining will

appear as ‘layers’” in the slab. ’516 Patent at 9:1–3; see also, e.g., id. at 7:56–60.

66. On information and belief, in each Accused Utility Patent Product, the first

pigmented vein is defined by a first particulate mineral mix and at least the first particulate mineral

mix is separated from and forms a substantially unmixed layer with respect to a second particulate

mineral mix defining the second pigmented vein according to a predefined layer pattern such that

each of the first and second pigmented veins has a vein thickness equal to and parallel to the slab

thickness. This is shown by the pictures of each Accused Utility Patent Product available on

Hirsch Glass’s website. See supra note 1. Moreover, Mr. Xie’s ’733 Patent states that “the at least

one vein has a thickness equal to and parallel to the slab thickness.” ’733 Patent at 2:33–34; see

also, e.g., id. at 6:35–36, Fig. 5. Further, Mr. Xie’s ’516 Patent states that “[q]uartz and resin

mixtures of different colors or compositions can be dropped to produce a pattern or veining,” and

“[t]his pattern or veining will appear as ‘layers’” in the slab. ’516 Patent at 9:1–3; see also, e.g.,

id. at 7:56–60.

67. On information and belief, in each Accused Utility Patent Product, the second

particulate mineral mix is different than the first particulate mineral mix. This is shown by the

pictures of each Accused Utility Patent Product available on Hirsch Glass’s website. See supra

note 1. Moreover, Mr. Xie’s ’516 Patent states that “[q]uartz and resin mixtures of different colors

or compositions can be dropped to produce a pattern or veining.” ’516 Patent at 9:1–3; see also,

e.g., id. at 7:56–60. Mr. Xie’s ’516 Patent also states that “[t]he method may further include

18
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 19 of 37 PageID# 19

supplying a second mixture of quartz and resin to an inner chamber of a mold, wherein the second

mixture is different from the first mixture.” Id. at 3:25–28; see also, e.g., id. at 5:61–64.

68. Cambria has been damaged as a result of the infringing conduct by Hirsch Glass

alleged above. Thus, Hirsch Glass is at least liable to Cambria in an amount that compensates

Cambria for such infringement, which by law cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together

with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.

69. Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the ’303 Patent has caused, and will continue to

cause, Cambria to suffer substantial and irreparable harm unless Hirsch Glass is enjoined by this

Court pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283.

70. Since at least December 26, 2017, Hirsch Glass has been on notice of and has actual

knowledge of the ’303 Patent. Further, Hirsch Glass has had constructive knowledge of the ’303

Patent from Cambria’s patent markings. Despite obtaining knowledge of the ’303 Patent, Hirsch

Glass has failed to cease its infringing activities.

71. Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the ’303 Patent is, has been, and continues to be,

willful, intentional, deliberate, and/or in conscious disregard of Cambria’s rights. Hirsch Glass’s

willful infringement entitles Cambria to increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to

attorney’s fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285.

COUNT II – INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’942 PATENT

72. Cambria incorporates by reference and realleges, as if fully set forth herein,

paragraphs 1–71 of this Complaint.

73. As described below, in violation of at least 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), Hirsch Glass

infringes and/or has infringed, directly or indirectly, and literally or under the doctrine of

equivalents, at least claim 1 of the ’942 Patent by importing, making, using, offering to sell, and/or

19
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 20 of 37 PageID# 20

selling the Accused Utility Patent Products without a license or permission from Cambria,

including in this judicial District.

74. Further, in violation of at least 35 U.S.C. § 271(g), Hirsch Glass imports, offers to

sell, sells, and/or uses within the United States the Accused Utility Patent Products, which are

made by the process patented in at least claim 1 of the ’942 Patent. Prior to importation into the

United States, the Accused Utility Patent Products are neither materially changed by subsequent

processes, nor do they become a trivial and nonessential component of another product.

75. Claim 1 of the ’942 Patent recites as follows:

1. A process of forming a processed slab from different particulate mineral


mixes, comprising:
positioning a slab mold in a substantially non-horizontal orientation;
dispensing multiple different particulate mineral mixes into the substantially
non-horizontally oriented mold so as to fill a mold space that is at least 6
feet long by at least 2 feet wide, the multiple different particulate mineral
mixes being differently pigmented;
adjusting the mold to a substantially horizontal orientation while the multiple
different particulate mineral mixes are in the mold; and
vibrating and compacting the multiple different particulate mineral mixes
arranged in the mold while the mold is in the substantially horizontal
orientation.

76. On information and belief, the Accused Utility Patent Products are made by a

process of forming a processed slab from different particulate mineral mixes. This is shown by

the pictures of each Accused Utility Patent Product available on Hirsch Glass’s website. See supra

note 1. Moreover, Mr. Xie’s ’733 Patent states that “the processed slab includes at least one vein

of a combination of materials.” ’733 Patent at 2:29–30; see also, e.g., id. at 6:31–32, Fig. 5.

Further, Mr. Xie’s ’516 Patent discloses the use of “[q]uartz and resin mixtures of different colors

or compositions” in forming a processed slab. ’516 Patent at 9:1–3; see also, e.g., id. at 7:56–60.

77. On information and belief, the process for making each of the Accused Utility

Patent Products comprises positioning a slab mold in a substantially non-horizontal orientation


20
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 21 of 37 PageID# 21

and dispensing multiple different particulate mineral mixes into the substantially non-horizontally

oriented mold so as to fill a mold space that is at least 6 feet long by at least 2 feet wide, the

multiple different particulate mineral mixes being differently pigmented. Specifically, Hirsch

Glass markets each of the Accused Utility Patent Products as being slabs that are each 63 inches

(5.25 feet) wide and 120 inches (10 feet) long. See supra note 1. Moreover, Mr. Xie’s ’733 Patent

states that “a method is provided which includes orienting the mold structure 28 in the vertical

position shown in FIG. 1 to receive material. Thereafter, the method may include depositing

material into the mold structure.” ’733 Patent at 6:4–8; see also, e.g., id. at 4:18–23, 4:57–49,

Figs. 1, 7. Mr. Xie’s ’733 Patent also states that “a processed slab[] may be provided which may

include a major surface at least two feet wide by at least six feet long and extending perpendicularly

to a slab thickness.” Id. at 2:26–29; see also, e.g., id. at 6:28–31. Further, Mr. Xie’s ’516 Patent

states that “[t]he mold . . . is in a vertical position as shown in FIG. 1” when dispensing the

particulate mineral mixes. ’516 Patent at 7:15–17; see also, e.g., id. at 11:29–31 (“The mold cover

gate 50 is removed to accept quartz and resin mixture when the mold 40 is in the vertical position

of FIG. 1.”). The ’516 Patent further states that “[q]uartz and resin mixtures of different colors or

compositions can be dropped to produce a pattern or veining.” Id. at 9:1–3; see also, e.g., id. at

7:56–60, Figs. 1–5.

78. On information and belief, the process of making the Accused Utility Patent

Products further comprises adjusting the mold to a substantially horizontal orientation while the

multiple different particulate mineral mixes are in the mold; and vibrating and compacting the

multiple different particulate mineral mixes arranged in the mold while the mold is in the

substantially horizontal orientation. The Accused Utility Patent Products are the result of this

process. See supra note 1. Moreover, Mr. Xie’s ’733 Patent states that “[a]fter depositing the

21
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 22 of 37 PageID# 22

mixed material 6a and 8a into the mold 28, the mold gate 28b can be closed and then the mold 28

can be rotated from its vertical position to a horizontal one,” before “further process[ing] such as

disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,511,516, to Xie.” ’733 Patent at 5:26–35; see also, e.g., Figs. 1–2.

Mr. Xie’s ’516 Patent states that “when the chamber 40g is filled up to the top opening 40f, a mold

gate 50 is put in position to cover the mold opening 40f, the mold 40 is then turned from the vertical

position of FIG. 1, to a horizontal or flat position,” whereupon “the mold gate 50 will prevent the

first, second, and third mixtures in the chamber 40g from falling out of the chamber 40g.” ’516

Patent at 6:52–59; see also, e.g., Figs. 1–7. The ’516 Patent further states that the slab is

“transfer[red] into a vacuum press machine” and, “[a]fter the slab 400 . . . is pressed,” “it is moved

into a curing machine.” Id. at 9:18–22.

79. Cambria has been damaged as a result of the infringing conduct by Hirsch Glass

alleged above. Thus, Hirsch Glass is at least liable to Cambria in an amount that compensates

Cambria for such infringement, which by law cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together

with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.

80. Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the ’942 Patent has caused, and will continue to

cause, Cambria to suffer substantial and irreparable harm unless Hirsch Glass is enjoined by this

Court pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283.

81. Since at least the filing of this Complaint, Hirsch Glass has been on notice of and

has actual knowledge of the ’942 Patent. Further, Hirsch Glass has had constructive knowledge

of the ’942 Patent from Cambria’s patent markings. Despite obtaining knowledge of the ’942

Patent, Hirsch Glass has failed to cease its infringing activities.

82. Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the ’942 Patent is, has been, and continues to be,

willful, intentional, deliberate, and/or in conscious disregard of Cambria’s rights. Hirsch Glass’s

22
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 23 of 37 PageID# 23

willful infringement entitles Cambria to increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to

attorney’s fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285.

COUNT III – INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’626 PATENT

83. Cambria incorporates by reference and realleges, as if fully set forth herein,

paragraphs 1–82 of this Complaint.

84. As described below, in violation of at least 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), Hirsch Glass

infringes and/or has infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, at least claim 1 of the

’626 Patent by importing, making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling the Accused Utility Patent

Products without a license or permission from Cambria, including in this judicial District.

85. Claim 1 of the ’626 Patent recites as follows:

1. A processed slab comprising a quartz material, comprising:


a major surface at least 2 feet wide by at least 6 feet long and extending
perpendicularly to a slab thickness, the major surface having a first
substantially bowed pigmented vein that extends generally lengthwise
from edge-to-edge, wherein the first substantially bowed pigmented
vein has a vein thickness equal to and parallel to the slab thickness,
wherein the slab comprises at least two different particulate mineral
mixes distributed in a series of successive layers according to a
predefined pattern, a first of the two different particulate mineral mixes
defining the first substantially bowed pigmented vein, and wherein the
first particulate mineral mix occupies the entire slab thickness at a first
region that defines the first substantially bowed pigmented vein and a
second of the two different particulate mineral mixes occupies the entire
slab thickness at a second region, the first particulate mineral mix being
absent from the second region and the second particulate mineral mix
being absent from the first region.

86. On information and belief, the Accused Utility Patent Products are processed slabs

comprising a quartz material. See, e.g., Spectrum Quartz Material Safety Data Sheet, available at

http://www.spectrumquartz.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/SpectrumQuartz_MSDS.pdf.

87. On information and belief, the Accused Utility Patent Products comprise a major

surface at least 2 feet wide by at least 6 feet long and extending perpendicularly to a slab thickness.
23
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 24 of 37 PageID# 24

Specifically, Hirsch Glass markets each of the Accused Utility Patent Products as being slabs that

are each 63 inches (5.25 feet) wide and 120 inches (10 feet) long. See supra note 1. Moreover,

Mr. Xie’s ’733 Patent states that “a processed slab[] may be provided which may include a major

surface at least two feet wide by at least six feet long and extending perpendicularly to a slab

thickness.” ’733 Patent at 2:26–29; see also, e.g., id. at 6:28–31.

88. On information and belief, the major surface of each Accused Utility Patent Product

has a first substantially bowed pigmented vein that extends generally lengthwise from edge-to-

edge, wherein the first substantially bowed pigmented vein has a vein thickness equal to and

parallel to the slab thickness. This is shown by the pictures of each Accused Utility Patent Product

available on Hirsch Glass’s website. See supra note 1. Moreover, Mr. Xie’s ’733 Patent states

that “the processed slab includes at least one vein of a combination of materials; wherein the at

least one vein extends generally lengthwise from a first edge of the processed slab to an opposing

second edge; wherein the at least one vein has a thickness equal to and parallel to the slab

thickness.” ’733 Patent at 2:29–34; see also, e.g., id. at 6:31–36. Mr. Xie’s ’733 Patent also

describes “a waved layer result in the mold.” Id. at 5:20–21; see also, e.g., id. at Figs. 3, 5, 7.

Further, Mr. Xie’s ’516 Patent states that “[q]uartz and resin mixtures of different colors or

compositions can be dropped to produce a pattern or veining,” and “[t]his pattern or veining will

appear as ‘layers’” in the slab. ’516 Patent at 9:1–3; see also, e.g., id. at 7:56–60.

89. On information and belief, for each Accused Utility Patent Product, the slab

comprises at least two different particulate mineral mixes distributed in a series of successive

layers according to a predefined pattern, a first of the two different particulate mineral mixes

defining the first substantially bowed pigmented vein, and wherein the first particulate mineral

mix occupies the entire slab thickness at a first region that defines the first substantially bowed

24
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 25 of 37 PageID# 25

pigmented vein and a second of the two different particulate mineral mixes occupies the entire slab

thickness at a second region, the first particulate mineral mix being absent from the second region

and the second particulate mineral mix being absent from the first region. This is shown by the

pictures of each Accused Utility Patent Product available on Hirsch Glass’s website. See supra

note 1. Moreover, Mr. Xie’s ’733 Patent states that “the processed slab includes at least one vein

of a combination of materials; wherein the at least one vein extends generally lengthwise from a

first edge of the processed slab to an opposing second edge; wherein the at least one vein has a

thickness equal to and parallel to the slab thickness.” ’733 Patent at 2:29–34; see also, e.g., id. at

6:31–36. Mr. Xie’s ’733 Patent also describes “a waved layer result in the mold.” Id. at 5:20–21;

see also, e.g., id. at Figs. 3, 5, 7. Further, Mr. Xie’s ’516 Patent states that “[q]uartz and resin

mixtures of different colors or compositions can be dropped to produce a pattern or veining,” and

“[t]his pattern or veining will appear as ‘layers’” in the slab. ’516 Patent at 9:1–3; see also, e.g.,

id. at 7:56–60.

90. Cambria has been damaged as a result of the infringing conduct by Hirsch Glass

alleged above. Thus, Hirsch Glass is at least liable to Cambria in an amount that compensates

Cambria for such infringement, which by law cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together

with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.

91. Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the ’626 Patent has caused, and will continue to

cause, Cambria to suffer substantial and irreparable harm unless Hirsch Glass is enjoined by this

Court pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283.

92. Since at least the filing of this Complaint, Hirsch Glass has been on notice of and

has actual knowledge of the ’626 Patent. Further, Hirsch Glass has had constructive knowledge

25
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 26 of 37 PageID# 26

of the ’626 Patent from Cambria’s patent markings. Despite obtaining knowledge of the ’626

Patent, Hirsch Glass has failed to cease its infringing activities.

93. Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the ’626 Patent is, has been, and continues to be,

willful, intentional, deliberate, and/or in conscious disregard of Cambria’s rights. Hirsch Glass’s

willful infringement entitles Cambria to increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to

attorney’s fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285.

COUNT IV – INFRINGEMENT OF THE D’670 PATENT

94. Cambria incorporates by reference and realleges, as if fully set forth herein,

paragraphs 1–93 of this Complaint.

95. As described below, in violation of at least 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), Hirsch Glass

infringes and/or has infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, the D’670 Patent by

importing, making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling products, including but not limited to its

Carefree product, without a license or permission from Cambria, including in this judicial District.

96. The D’670 Patent is directed to a “portion of a slab” as shown in its sole figure:

26
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 27 of 37 PageID# 27

97. As shown below, the design of Hirsch Glass’s infringing Carefree product, in the

eye of the ordinary observer who is familiar with the prior art in the field, appears substantially

similar to the ornamental design of the D’670 Patent:

98. Cambria has been damaged as a result of the infringing conduct by Hirsch Glass

alleged above. Thus, Hirsch Glass is at least liable to Cambria in an amount that compensates

Cambria for such infringement, which by law cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together

with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.

99. Hirsch Glass has applied the patented design of the D’670 Patent, or at least a

colorable imitation thereof, to an article of manufacture for the purpose of sale, and/or has sold or

exposed for sale an article of manufacture to which such design or colorable imitation has been

applied. Thus, Hirsch Glass is liable to Cambria to the extent of Hirsch Glass’s total profit for

such sales under 35 U.S.C. § 289.

100. Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the D’670 Patent has caused, and will continue to

cause, Cambria to suffer substantial and irreparable harm unless Hirsch Glass is enjoined by this

Court pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283.

27
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 28 of 37 PageID# 28

101. Since at least the filing of this Complaint, Hirsch Glass has been on notice of and

has actual knowledge of the D’670 Patent. Further, Hirsch Glass has had constructive knowledge

of the D’670 Patent from Cambria’s patent markings. Despite obtaining knowledge of the D’670

Patent, Hirsch Glass has failed to cease its infringing activities.

102. Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the D’670 Patent is, has been, and continues to be,

willful, intentional, deliberate, and/or in conscious disregard of Cambria’s rights. Hirsch Glass’s

willful infringement entitles Cambria to increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to

attorney’s fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285.

COUNT V – INFRINGEMENT OF THE D’577 PATENT

103. Cambria incorporates by reference and realleges, as if fully set forth herein,

paragraphs 1–102 of this Complaint.

104. As described below, in violation of at least 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), Hirsch Glass

infringes and/or has infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, the D’577 Patent by

importing, making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling products, including but not limited to its

Poise Light product, without a license or permission from Cambria, including in this judicial

District.

105. The D’577 Patent is directed to a “portion of a slab” as shown in its sole figure:

28
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 29 of 37 PageID# 29

106. As shown below, the design of Hirsch Glass’s infringing Poise Light product, in

the eye of the ordinary observer who is familiar with the prior art in the field, appears substantially

similar to the ornamental design of the D’577 Patent:

107. Cambria has been damaged as a result of the infringing conduct by Hirsch Glass

alleged above. Thus, Hirsch Glass is at least liable to Cambria in an amount that compensates

Cambria for such infringement, which by law cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together

with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.
29
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 30 of 37 PageID# 30

108. Hirsch Glass has applied the patented design of the D’577 Patent, or at least a

colorable imitation thereof, to an article of manufacture for the purpose of sale, and/or has sold or

exposed for sale an article of manufacture to which such design or colorable imitation has been

applied. Thus, Hirsch Glass is liable to Cambria to the extent of Hirsch Glass’s total profit for

such sales under 35 U.S.C. § 289.

109. Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the D’577 Patent has caused, and will continue to

cause, Cambria to suffer substantial and irreparable harm unless Hirsch Glass is enjoined by this

Court pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283.

110. Since at least the filing of this Complaint, Hirsch Glass has been on notice of and

has actual knowledge of the D’577 Patent. Further, Hirsch Glass has had constructive knowledge

of the D’577 Patent from Cambria’s patent markings. Despite obtaining knowledge of the D’577

Patent, Hirsch Glass has failed to cease its infringing activities.

111. Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the D’577 Patent is, has been, and continues to be,

willful, intentional, deliberate, and/or in conscious disregard of Cambria’s rights. Hirsch Glass’s

willful infringement entitles Cambria to increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to

attorney’s fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285.

COUNT VI – INFRINGEMENT OF THE D’905 PATENT

112. Cambria incorporates by reference and realleges, as if fully set forth herein,

paragraphs 1–111 of this Complaint.

113. As described below, in violation of at least 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), Hirsch Glass

infringes and/or has infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, the D’905 Patent by

importing, making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling products, including but not limited to its

30
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 31 of 37 PageID# 31

Symphony product, without a license or permission from Cambria, including in this judicial

District.

114. The D’905 Patent is directed to a “portion of a slab” as shown in its sole figure:

115. As shown below, the design of Hirsch Glass’s infringing Symphony product, in the

eye of the ordinary observer who is familiar with the prior art in the field, appears substantially

similar to the ornamental design of the D’905 Patent:

116. Cambria has been damaged as a result of the infringing conduct by Hirsch Glass

alleged above. Thus, Hirsch Glass is at least liable to Cambria in an amount that compensates
31
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 32 of 37 PageID# 32

Cambria for such infringement, which by law cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together

with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.

117. Hirsch Glass has applied the patented design of the D’905 Patent, or at least a

colorable imitation thereof, to an article of manufacture for the purpose of sale, and/or has sold or

exposed for sale an article of manufacture to which such design or colorable imitation has been

applied. Thus, Hirsch Glass is liable to Cambria to the extent of Hirsch Glass’s total profit for

such sales under 35 U.S.C. § 289.

118. Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the D’905 Patent has caused, and will continue to

cause, Cambria to suffer substantial and irreparable harm unless Hirsch Glass is enjoined by this

Court pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283.

119. Since the filing of this Complaint, Hirsch Glass has been on notice of and has actual

knowledge of the D’905 Patent. Further, Hirsch Glass has had constructive knowledge of the

D’905 Patent from Cambria’s patent markings. Despite obtaining knowledge of the D’905 Patent,

Hirsch Glass has failed to cease its infringing activities.

120. Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the D’905 Patent is, has been, and continues to be,

willful, intentional, deliberate, and/or in conscious disregard of Cambria’s rights. Hirsch Glass’s

willful infringement entitles Cambria to increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to

attorney’s fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285.

COUNT VII – INFRINGEMENT OF THE D’332 PATENT

121. Cambria incorporates by reference and realleges, as if fully set forth herein,

paragraphs 1–120 of this Complaint.

122. As described below, in violation of at least 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), Hirsch Glass

infringes and/or has infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, the D’332 Patent by

32
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 33 of 37 PageID# 33

importing, making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling products, including but not limited to its

Summit and Pinnacle products, without a license or permission from Cambria, including in this

judicial District.

123. The D’332 Patent is directed to a “slab” as shown in its sole figure:

124. As shown below, the design of Hirsch Glass’s infringing Summit (below on the

left) and Pinnacle (below on the right) products, in the eye of the ordinary observer who is familiar

with the prior art in the field, appear substantially similar to the ornamental design of the D’332

Patent:

125. Cambria has been damaged as a result of the infringing conduct by Hirsch Glass

alleged above. Thus, Hirsch Glass is at least liable to Cambria in an amount that compensates

33
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 34 of 37 PageID# 34

Cambria for such infringement, which by law cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together

with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.

126. Hirsch Glass has applied the patented design of the D’332 Patent, or at least a

colorable imitation thereof, to an article of manufacture for the purpose of sale, and/or has sold or

exposed for sale an article of manufacture to which such design or colorable imitation has been

applied. Thus, Hirsch Glass is liable to Cambria to the extent of Hirsch Glass’s total profit for

such sales under 35 U.S.C. § 289.

127. Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the D’332 Patent has caused, and will continue to

cause, Cambria to suffer substantial and irreparable harm unless Hirsch Glass is enjoined by this

Court pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283.

128. Since at least February 6, 2018, Hirsch Glass has been on notice of and has actual

knowledge of the D’332 Patent. Further, Hirsch Glass has had constructive knowledge of the

D’332 Patent from Cambria’s patent markings. Despite obtaining knowledge of the D’332 Patent,

Hirsch Glass has failed to cease its infringing activities.

129. Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the D’332 Patent is, has been, and continues to be,

willful, intentional, deliberate, and/or in conscious disregard of Cambria’s rights. Hirsch Glass’s

willful infringement entitles Cambria to increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to

attorney’s fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285.

COUNT VIII – INFRINGEMENT OF THE D’333 PATENT

130. Cambria incorporates by reference and realleges, as if fully set forth herein,

paragraphs 1–129 of this Complaint.

131. As described below, in violation of at least 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), Hirsch Glass

infringes and/or has infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, the D’333 Patent by

34
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 35 of 37 PageID# 35

importing, making, using, offering to sell, and/or selling products, including but not limited to its

Symphony product, without a license or permission from Cambria, including in this judicial

District.

132. The D’333 Patent is directed to a “slab” as shown in its sole figure:

133. As shown below, the design of Hirsch Glass’s infringing Symphony product, in the

eye of the ordinary observer who is familiar with the prior art in the field, appears substantially

similar to the ornamental design of the D’333 Patent:

134. Cambria has been damaged as a result of the infringing conduct by Hirsch Glass

alleged above. Thus, Hirsch Glass is at least liable to Cambria in an amount that compensates

Cambria for such infringement, which by law cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together

with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284.

35
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 36 of 37 PageID# 36

135. Hirsch Glass has applied the patented design of the D’333 Patent, or at least a

colorable imitation thereof, to an article of manufacture for the purpose of sale, and/or has sold or

exposed for sale an article of manufacture to which such design or colorable imitation has been

applied. Thus, Hirsch Glass is liable to Cambria to the extent of Hirsch Glass’s total profit for

such sales under 35 U.S.C. § 289.

136. Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the D’333 Patent has caused, and will continue to

cause, Cambria to suffer substantial and irreparable harm unless Hirsch Glass is enjoined by this

Court pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283.

137. Since the filing of this Complaint, Hirsch Glass has been on notice of and has actual

knowledge of the D’333 Patent. Further, Hirsch Glass has had constructive knowledge of the

D’333 Patent from Cambria’s patent markings. Despite obtaining knowledge of the D’333 Patent,

Hirsch Glass has failed to cease its infringing activities.

138. Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the D’333 Patent is, has been, and continues to be,

willful, intentional, deliberate, and/or in conscious disregard of Cambria’s rights. Hirsch Glass’s

willful infringement entitles Cambria to increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to

attorney’s fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285.

JURY TRIAL DEMAND

139. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38, Cambria demands a trial by jury

on all issues that are properly triable to a jury.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Cambria respectfully requests that this Honorable Court enter judgment

for Cambria and against Hirsch Glass, granting Cambria the following relief:

A. A judgment that Hirsch Glass has infringed one or more claims of the Asserted
Patents;
36
Case 1:21-cv-00143-LMB-IDD Document 1 Filed 02/09/21 Page 37 of 37 PageID# 37

B. An award of damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284 adequate to compensate Cambria


for Hirsch Glass’s infringement and in no event less than a reasonable royalty,
together with both pre- and post-judgment interest and costs as fixed by the Court
from the first date of infringement of the Asserted Patents;

C. An award of Hirsch Glass’s profits pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 289 resulting from


Hirsch Glass’s infringement of the Asserted Design Patents;

D. A permanent injunction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283 prohibiting further


infringement of the Asserted Patents by Hirsch Glass or any person acting in
concert with Hirsch Glass;

E. A judgment that Hirsch Glass’s infringement has been willful and an award of
increased damages as permitted under 35 U.S.C. § 284;

F. A finding that this case is exceptional and an award of attorneys’ fees and costs to
Cambria as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 285 or as otherwise permitted by law; and

G. Such other relief as this Court may deem proper and just.

Dated: February 9, 2021 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Thomas M. Buchanan


Thomas M. Buchanan (VSB No. 21530)
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
1901 L Street NW
Washington, DC 20036
Tel: (202) 282-5000
Fax: (202) 282-5100
TBuchana@winston.com

OF COUNSEL:

Katherine Vidal (pro hac vice to be filed)


Eimeric Reig-Plessis (pro hac vice to be filed)
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 205
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Tel: (650) 858-6500
Fax: (650) 858-6550
KVidal@winston.com
EReigPlessis@winston.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,


CAMBRIA COMPANY LLC

37

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen