Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Introduction
Online education is not inherently inferior to classroom education. It is even possible
to create online courses that help students learn more effectively than traditional methods. As the
quality of online education improves and as a higher percentage of students are extremely
comfortable using computers, it is likely that students will begin choosing online education
because they truly prefer it over traditional classroom methods.
Some of the unique opportunities afforded by online education include:
The ability to provide quality nursing education to students who are prevented from
attending traditional classes by family and work obligations
A conscious move toward learner-centered instruction
Opportunities to employ active learning
Ability to address a variety of learning styles
Extensive communication among students, faculty, experts "in the field," and others
Obviously, these results don't just "happen"; we have to actively incorporate activities
into our courses to make sure students are communicating, taking some responsibility for the
direction of their learning, etc.
The data on the effectiveness of online education are mixed. Some individual studies
show that students do somewhat better in online courses; some studies show that traditional
courses are slightly more effective than online courses. Overall, studies show that students in
online courses get similar grades and score equally well on tests as students in traditional
courses. In addition, some studies show that though test scores are similar, critical thinking and
problem-solving skills are better among distance ed students than traditional classroom students.
By Emily Springfield - Media Consultant - University of Michigan School of Nursing
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~espring/edTech/ Last updated 2/25/2011
Page 3
Online education could be more effective at teaching
content than in-class education
Many of the advantages of distance education may be related to teaching style more than
teaching medium. Because the lecture format is widely considered to be ineffective as an online
teaching technique, many instructors incorporate more active learning into their courses. They
may also incorporate multiple media for content delivery, which helps students with different
learning styles.
When instructors make an effort to address multiple learning styles and to incorporate
active learning into their courses, students learn more, retain it longer, and drop out at
significantly lower rates than with traditional lecture courses (Dunn and Griggs, 1998. Learning
Styles and the Nursing Profession. NLN Press, New York.). Don’t worry – you don’t need to
teach your course three entirely different ways simultaneously! It’s enough to more
Active Learning requires students to engage with the material, the instructor, and other
students. Techniques include asking students to form hypotheses, generate lists, and write summaries,
either alone or in small groups. For example, instead of the instructor verbally listing a list of procedures
that might be used in a particular situation, she asks students to get into groups of three and list the
procedures, either from their readings or their personal experience. She’d then ask two groups of
students to read their lists and write the items on the board, ask if any other group had additions, and
then fill in any missing items herself.
Online courses usually devote all meeting times (whether those meetings happen in person or
online) to active learning pursuits – it’s just not a good use of time to watch a 60 minute video when you
only meet for a few hours each month. More…
Many students show a strong preference for a particular learning style: auditory, visual, or
kinesthetic. These students learn best when they hear information (auditory), see diagrams, charts, or
pictures (visual); or physically manipulate objects (kinesthetic). While some people are comfortable with
a combination of learning styles, some people simply have a hard time learning in certain ways – which
you’ve probably experienced when you’ve explained something to a student repeatedly, then drawn her
a simple flow chart and she suddenly says “Oh, I get it!”
Students may also be global or analytical learners. Global learners need to know the “big
picture” – how this lesson fits into the overall topic, why it’s important, etc. – before they can focus on
the details of what’s being taught. Analytical learners need to know every minute detail and step before
they can tie that concept to the big picture. More…
This is often referred to as "Guide on the Side" teaching instead of "Sage on the Stage"
teaching. This illustrates one key difference between traditional and online courses.
As you prepare your course, keep in mind that your goal is not to “put your existing
course online.” Instead, your goal is to “create an effective online course” – one that
coincidentally covers similar content. Many face-to-face course formats don't work well at all
when translated online, so don't assume you'll create a good online course by simply translating
all of your current course activities into an online format.
The classic example of this is the large lecture class. The face-to-face version consists of
a 3-hour lecture once per week, three papers, a midterm, and a final exam. Lectures are not at all
interactive because there is "a lot of content to cover" in the course and the professor wants to be
sure all that information is conveyed.
It is quite easy to put this exact course online. Simply videotape each lecture, put the
video on the web, have students submit papers via e-mail and take their exams online. The
problem is that it's very difficult to watch a tiny video for three hours straight, and it is very
difficult to retain any information from it - even if you're taking notes. Students will often skip
videotaped lectures entirely and simply try to learn everything from textbooks because it's so
difficult to actually learn anything from a taped lecture.
So how do you convert a lecture course to an effective online format? The key is in
separating your course activities from the media used to deliver them.
Content delivery
In every class, we select content that students need to learn, organize it, and present it to
them. This is the "body" of the course and is usually our first thought when we start planning a
course. The important thing to keep in mind is that content delivery is not our sole job as
educators. If content delivery were the only value of faculty members, we could easily be
replaced by books, web sites, and journal articles.
Keep in mind that long stretches of human speech are not very effective in online
courses. If you are accustomed to delivering most of your content via lecture, you will need
to choose a different medium for delivering the bulk of your content.
I sometimes hear faculty members say they “have to lecture” because their students do not
“prepare for class” adequately. This could obviously be a problem in an online course where there is
little or no lecture! However, students are masters of doing exactly what is required. If they know they
can’t skim a chapter, then have the important points called out for them in lecture, most can and will rise
to the challenge, do their reading, and participate fully in class activities.
This is where the real learning happens. We've all had students who memorize facts and
phrases and spit them back during a test – but don’t demonstrate actual learning. To truly learn,
students must process information, put it in context, and connect it to things they already know.
Processing is arguably the most important stage of the learning cycle, and it is the most-
often overlooked stage. Processing happens when students make use of content that was
delivered. They can do this alone – for example, by completing homework – or by interacting
with the instructor and other students in discussion and projects.
Finally, we need to know that students have, in fact, learned what we wanted them to
learn. Most courses include multiple evaluation activities – quizzes, tests, skill observation,
projects, etc. Hopefully, evaluation occurs often enough that misinformation can be corrected
and lagging students can be helped before it's too late.
Link: Implementing the Seven Principles: Technology as Lever by Chickering and Ehrman
An article describing the seven principles of effective instruction, which emphasizes the role of
interaction in effective teaching.
If a picture is worth a thousand words, a video clip can be worth a thousand pictures - but
only if it is used properly. Compare a 10-minute video of a professor describing a procedure and
a 10-minute video of the procedure itself, accompanied by comments from the professor. The
video of the professor has little more value than text; most students could read that description
verbatim in less time than it took the professor to read it out loud, and most would remember it
better. (The exception, of course, is that auditory learners would pick up more from listening to
the description than reading it – see the discussion of learning styles.)
Recommended technologies
The following is a list of recommended technologies for use in online courses in the
School of Nursing at the University of Michigan. This list takes into account the following
issues:
Utility – does it do promote quality online education?
Ease of use – if you can use Word and e-mail, you should be able to use it with less than
an hour of training
Reliability – proven to not crash at U-M
Low drain on resources – both human and electronic
Price – both startup and ongoing
Accessibility – for those with disabilities, no access to high-speed Internet, etc.
Reusability – does it create modules that can be updated?
Most of these are currently available in the School of Nursing; some are available
through the Duderstadt Center (formerly the Media Union).
Almost any technology can be used in a sound educational manner, and almost any
technology can be used poorly. However, the following technologies have enough significant
problems that we generally recommend against their use. Support, training, and assistance using
these technologies will be limited. If you have a good argument for using one of the following,
let’s discuss it! It may be time to update our list of recommended technologies.
In online courses, time spent together as a class (synchronous meetings) is precious – usually
less than an hour a week on average. Use this time for interaction, which is harder to do
asynchronously.
Course “templates”
“Lecture” courses
Lecture courses do not translate well to an online environment. You’d think it would be
simple – just record the lecture, put it online, and gather papers and tests. However, student
retention and satisfaction are extremely low in this scenario.
Your best bet is to restructure lecture courses so students learn the bulk of their content
from readings (written by you or others). Then increase the amount of student interaction with
the content.
For most courses, asynchronous techniques work best for delivering content. Some of the
most popular techniques are textbook readings, PDF readings, computer-based learning
modules, annotated PowerPoint slides, and independent student research (e.g., you ask
each student to find and read three articles on a specific topic)
Some topics, like statistics, are taught most effectively by an instructor who is talking,
writing, and diagramming simultaneously. This can be accomplished asynchronously
with a document camera and microphone (or video camera), or it can happen
synchronously with Centra.
Design ways for students to interact with the content, with you, and
with each other.
Decide how you’ll know that students have learned what they need to
learn.
Common techniques include papers, written tests, online tests, and presentations/projects.
Seminar courses
A key feature of seminar courses is small group discussion. These discussions translate to
the web in two ways: synchronous (“live”) discussions and asynchronous (“threaded”)
discussions.
All synchronous techniques have the benefit of instant interaction and the downside of
the difficulty of scheduling a time when all students can attend.
Telephone conference calls: Several people talk on the phone simultaneously, like a
party line.
o Pros: These are simple to set up, very cheap to run (if you require students to pay
the long-distance charges), and they work fairly well.
o Cons: It can be difficult to have a good conversation with more than 5-6 people at
a time; not recorded; hard to tell who is speaking and thus hard to assign a
participation grade
Live web chat: students type their conversation onto a web page. Topics are “threaded,”
meaning each line of discussion is labeled with a subject.
o Pros: a log of the chat is kept, so students who miss the session can read the
discussion. The log also lets you see who is contributing, making it easier to
assign participation grades.
o Cons: Slow typers have a hard time “getting a word in edgewise.” Can be hard to
follow, especially with more than 5-6 people. Note: An ever-increasing number of
our incoming students spend hours daily “IMing” – using Instant Message chats –
and have no problem following live chats. In fact, many can follow and contribute
to a number of threads simultaneously, meaning live chats will become more and
more viable as an option as time passes.
Centra web conference: All participants can hear each other speak. Participants with
web cameras are also visible to others when they speak. A large portion of the screen can
show PowerPoint slides, web pages, an electronic white board, or any other software you
are running.
o Pros: Recordable. Clearly designates who is speaking at a given time. Can share
software, write on the “white board,” show video, etc. Very good for doing
student presentations, teaching statistics, and other uses where you need audio and
visuals.
o Cons: Costs $50/hr per group of 10 people; this is a very reasonable price which
can be added to course fees. The University currently can have up to 40 people
using it at once; it’s best if you make reservations in advance.
Most clinical prep courses combine either a lecture or seminar session with clinical
practice. The guidelines above are good guidelines for the non-clinical segment of the course.
Often in a clinical course, experts are brought in to speak on specific course-related
topics. While these have some of the drawbacks of long lectures (e.g., no transcript for hearing
impaired or non-auditory learners), often the recording and/or broadcast of these lectures is the
only practical way to get information from the experts to the students. In these cases, it would be
possible to video the presentation, format it for easier viewing, and distribute to students via web
or CD.
Interaction tips
By Emily Springfield - Media Consultant - University of Michigan School of Nursing
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~espring/edTech/ Last updated 2/25/2011
Page 14
Communication is key – number one complaint is not hearing from instructor. Do it often
and consistently
A live lecture is actually not just a tool for content delivery. During a lecture, you scan
the room for confused expressions and repeat or clarify certain points. You may
emphasize points by writing them on the board, pointing to words on PowerPoint slides,
or adding phrases like “The key point is…”. When you deliver content online, it is easy
for much of this refining and finesse to get lost.
Assessment tips
Be overly clear when writing assignments
Time commitments
Designing online courses takes longer than designing traditional courses - up to twice
as long. There are several reasons:
You've been designing traditional courses for years - online teaching is a new skill.
You will probably incorporate more active teaching strategies, which take
longer to plan and set up.
It takes longer to write out your content - or find appropriate readings - than it takes to
sketch and outline of a lecture you'd deliver in person.
You may be using technology that is new to you.
Actually teaching the course will take less time, because you will not have a day when
you need to lecture for 2-3 hours straight, though you may have synchronous meetings for an
hour every week or so. You will spend more time giving individual feedback and significant
time reading and responding to student work (in bulletin boards or as homework).
Second semester
The second time you teach a course online, you will want to make significant revisions.
Expect to spend time redesigning your course before teaching it the second time. Ideally, keep
detailed notes during the first semester so you remember what needs to change. The second
semester's planning will probably take a little longer than normal course revisions, but it won't be
nearly as arduous as the original planning.
Other things that will go faster the second time around:
You'll be more comfortable with the technology.
You'll have found some time-saving techniques that work for you, e.g., knowing what
questions are likely to warrant a group response instead of individual messages to a
number of students.
You'll find a rhythm for interacting with students that works for both you and them -
enough feedback so they don't feel lost, but not so much that you feel chained to your
computer.
Subsequent semesters
Technology woes
Support
Social students need to feel a sense of community. It's a huge help just to know that
other people are going through the same thing you are!
Quick, specific feedback. Respond within 36 hours. Check e-mail at least once before
Sunday night. Pick a mode of communication (e-mail or CTools) and stick with it.
Analogies
By Emily Springfield - Media Consultant - University of Michigan School of Nursing
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~espring/edTech/ Last updated 2/25/2011
Page 18
Acting in a mask
Student stresses
Computer problems
Material online changing
Lack of feedback
Self-doubt – do I really understand this?
Loneliness
Lack of motivation
Lack of consistency within and among classes
Imagine taking 3 classes simultaneously, and each class files the syllabus under a
different area
Most successful online students find 2-3 consistent time slots during a week when they
do the bulk of their work. Usually at least half this time is on the weekend.
Convenience
Online learning is the only educational option for many people who work full-time. It's
important to remember, though, that people need to have the same number of hours free for
study even if they don't have time available to attend classes during the work day.
Content learning
Students do learn content well online, especially if they have some background in the
subject area.
There is much more to changing careers than simply learning a new set of skills and
concepts. Classroom education - whether online or in person - often does not teach students
"how to be a professional in the field," and online education usually lacks the informal
educational opportunities found between classes, during work/study jobs, etc.
Networking
Questions