Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
MODULE SPECIALIST
Handbook for Module Specialist
Introduction
This handbook helps the module specialist develop modules in training and
consultancy. A good module consists of:
1. Program Outline
2. Descriptor
3. Pre and Post Assessment
4. Teaching Notes
5. Notes – Slides
6. Workbook
Operational Definition
Figure 1:
Relationship between Training Program,
Modules and topics.
Training Program
Modules
Topics
1
1. Program Outline
1) TITLE
i. The title must be catchy, creative and does not reflect directly from any text book.
The title must consist of a main title and a subtitle.
iv. The Module Writer has to ensure the title is novel, distinguished and not taken from
any public domain or internet sources.
2) QUESTIONS
The objective of the questions are to capture the attention of the reader. The following
are criterias for good questions:
e) The questions generate strong participants’ interest to continue reading the next
section - the Introduction.
2
3) INTRODUCTION
i. Introduction of the program addresses the “so what” issues of the program. The
Module Writer needs to focus on:
• Background of th e topic
• Problems encountered if this topic is omitted – addressing the pain
• The speciality of the program – why this program not other programs
ii. The Module Writer needs to convince the reader that this is a must attend training.
iii. The Module Writer must intensify focus on the module topics and areas covered
in the module.
4) PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
i. From the “Problem encountered” in introduction, the Module Writer needs to create
the needs of the program and issues that would be addressed.
ii. Objectives help to set the direction towards the whole module.
iv. According to Benjamin Bloom, and his colleagues, there are six levels of cognition:
3
v. Keywords of Bloom is listed in Table 1.
Bloom’s Ranking
Terminology
of thinking skills
vi. Modules must be able to link the objectives to the topic presented.
4
5) LEARNING OUTCOMES
V ALUES / UNDERSTANDING
A TTITUDE
S KILLS /ABILITY
K NOWLEDGE
v. Focus on Participant Behavior. Learning outcomes are on what participants are able
to demonstrate upon completion of a course or a program.
vi. Learning outcomes are not about what the instructors can provide but what the
participants are able to demonstrate.
5
vii. The following are not learning outcomes:
• Participants in critical writing seminars will write two essays on critical thinking
skills.
Participants will be able to collect and organize appropriate clinical data (history, physical
exam, laboratory assessments including technology advancements in diagnostic such as
PCR). Participants will be able to apply principles of evidence-based medicine to
determine clinical diagnoses, and formulate and implement acceptable treatment
modalities.
Participants will be able to articulate cultural and socioeconomic differences and the
significance of these differences for instructional planning.
ix. Learning outcomes must be realistic. Never over promise as this will be applied
as criteria of the program evaluation.
6
6) WHO SHOULD ATTEND
i. This refers to proposing employees or people who should attend this training.
Concurrently, the module specialist must identify if any skills or knowledge is prior
important before a participant attends this program.
ii. Module writer needs to identify the specific post of the employees.
7) LEVEL OF TRAINING
• Elementary
• Intermediate
• Advanced
• Certified / Expert
ii. Elementary program refers to a program that provides fundamental knowledge. This
program does not need any basic knowledge. The program is usually a one day program.
iii. Intermediate program refers to a program that provides essential knowledge and skills. This
program might need prior basic knowledge. The program is usually a two-day program.
iv. Advanced program refers to program that provides intensive knowledge, skills and attitude.
This program needs prior basic knowledge. The program usually lasts two days or more.
v. Certified/Expert program refers to program that provides intensive knowledge, skills and
attitude. This program needs prior knowledge. The program usually requires a minimum
of three days.
vi. The Module writer can have a combination of several levels. For example, a two-day
program can cover elementary, intermediate and advanced levels.
7
8) METHODOLOGY OF DELIVERIES
iii. The Instructor must not directly read from the slides. The slide presentation
is only as a participants guide.
v. This is essential for participants to best demonstrate what they have learned
during the program. Methodology examples can be:
• Lecture mode
• Exercises & Quizzes/Trivia
• Role Plays & Case Studies
• Audio & Visual Aid
• Interactive games & activities
• Review and Apply Learning Concepts
• Micro Discussions and presentations
9) PROGRAM OUTLINE
i) Program outline consist of
a) Module title
b) Time
c) Description of the module
iii. Compulsory to slot in a tea break (30 minutes) and lunch (1 hour) into
the module.
iv. The Module writer can adjust the time and number of modules,
accordingly.
8
Day One
9:00 – 9:30 am Registration, Pre Test Assessment and Ice-Breaker
Day Two
9
Note:
• The Training Outlines must be approved before starting to develop other documents.
• All submissions shall be in word file (.doc/.docx).
• All submissions shall be submitted to Humanology in stages.
• Please refer to Section 3 (Pre Post Assessment) which contain further details.
ii. The Continuous Assessment is to have good questions which perfectly apply
and meet the program’s outlines and learning objectives.
iv. The allocated duration for this Continuous Assessment should comply well in
accordance to the minimum 3-month window, whereby the evaluation
improvement gap is ideal.
2. Descriptor
Introduction
Descriptors help the module writer to constructively plan the session they would like to
share with the participants. It consists of:
a) Abstract
b) Module descriptors
10
Abstract
Module Descriptors
Table 2: Descriptors
• Describe xxxxx
Topics 1
• List xxxx
Topics 2
Topics 3
Topics 4
a. Module title
b. Breakdown of the topics
c. Learning outcomes of each topics
ii. The Module Writer needs to complete all modules according to the program outlines.
iii. This document shall be submitted together with program outlines.
11
3. Pre and Post Assessment
Introduction
This evaluation helps participants to understand their knowledge before and upon
program completion. The objective of the assessment is to ensure improvement of
different levels. The evaluation includes:
• V - Values / Understanding
• A - Attitude
• S - Skills / Ability
• K - Knowledge
• A – Action / Measurable features
Pre Assessment
A. Dog
B. Cat
C. Bat
D. Flower
(Answer: D)
12
Post Assessment
A. Dog
B. Cat
C. Monkey
D. Tiger
(Answer: C)
ii. The questions are not allowed to be reproduced from books or internet sources.
a. MCQ questions
b. Short questions
13
4. Teaching Notes
1. Introduction
The teaching notes will help to build a knowledge centre for Humanology. This document
requires writers to plan the allocated time for each topic. The Instruction handbook must be
consistent according to the training outline and descriptors especially on the time allocation
of each topic.
Components
I. Name of activity
III. Objective
a. Group Size
b. Estimated Time
c. Training Methods
d. Materials
e. Equipment and Supplies
f. Room Set-up
g. Comments
a. Step-By-Step Procedure
b. Variations
c. Post activity review
VI. Handout
14
2. Details Descriptions the components
I. Name of activity
a. Group Size
b. Estimated Time
c. Training Methods
d. Materials
15
e. Equipment and Supplies
f. Room Set-up
g. Comments
a. Step-By-Step Procedure
b. Variations
i. This sessions share tips on how to change the system when the proposed
number of participants vary, either too many participants or too few participants.
a. Step by step method on how to develop the tools must be clearly written.
b. Sample pictures must be given for specific tools produced.
LEADERSHIP SHIELD
Overview of Activity
Through participation in an art project, leaders identify their basic values and share
them with others, so that participants who will be working together on assignments
have a greater understanding of each other’s strengths.
Objective
GROUP SIZE
Up to 20 participants
ESTIMATED TIME
30 minutes
TRAINING METHODS
Art project
Reflection
Discussion
17
MATERIALS
Several sets of coloured markers for participants to share Flipchart paper One
large poster with an outline of ashield, with one of the four following words in each
section: background, philosophy of life, values, and leadership.
ROOM SET-UP
Move furniture away from the walls to create space for participants to hang up
and stand next to large pieces of paper during the discussion. Post the large
poster as you prepare to open the activity.
Comments
Use this activity when you have sufficient space on the walls to post the shields.
An alternative is to have participants complete their shields on copy paper. This
is a popular activity; participants are able to work with categories of information
that are interesting to them.
STEP-BY-STEP PROCEDURE
Step 1: Ask which participants have a family coat of arms, crest, or shield. Ask
those who respond positively to describe or draw a picture of it. Explain that the
purpose is to develop a new symbol that emphasizes leadership.
18
Step 2: Distribute one sheet of flipchart paper and several colored markers to
each participant. Ask participants to draw the outline of a crest or shield on
the paper. Demonstrate by drawing the outline of a shield on your flipchart
(or distribute Handout 3.1). As noted on the handout, a shield is a pictorial
representation that may show one’s values, beliefs, and ideas.
Step 3: Explain that four categories of information have been selected for
representation on the shield or coatof arms. Announce one category at a time,
and remind participants to leave space on their shield for all four. Allow them
approximately two minutes to draw each response. The categories, each of
which should be represented in one quadrant of the shield are:
Step 4: Ask the participants to complete their coats of arms by writing their family
names on the shield and adding a personal motto that they try to exemplify. If they
wish, they can embellish their shields with other graphics or designs.
Step 5: Ask participants to explain what they have included on their shield, and
why. Allow approximately one minute per person. (Participants might only have
time to explain one part of it.)
Step 6: Briefly discuss how our backgrounds, values, and personal philosophies
affect the ways we interact and lead. Tie what is shared by the participants into
the content of your leadership program.
2. Which quadrant, if any, reveals something about you that others might not know?
19
VARIATIONS
Take a picture of each participant and affix it to each person’s shield. If you have
more than 20 people or you need to save time, form groups of 5 to 6 participants
for Step 5.
POST-ACTIVITY REVIEW
Take time shortly after conducting this activity to reflect on how it went, how
engaged the participants were, and what questions they raised. Then, make notes
that include how much time you actually spent on the activity.
HANDOUT
Leadership Shield
20
5. Notes – Slides
Introduction
The slides are presented to the participants either face to face or via an online learning
platform. Slides help to deliver knowledge to the participants.
Slides
a. Presentation slides
b. Printing slides
• Module Title
• Outline
• Learning outcomes
• Activities
• Try it Out
• Extra Reading
• Summary
iv. The slides must strictly follow the course outline, descriptors and teaching notes.
21
vi. Pictures / diagrams used in the slides must not be reproduced from the internet.
vii. Copyright issues would be strictly taken into consideration for all slides.
22
1. Sample of acceptable slides
Notes and
description
details are put
at the note
column at
PowerPoint
23
6. Workbook
Introduction
This is an extra resource for participants to read and also refer to after the
workshop/program had been completed. The workbook must be consistent with the
slides, program outlines and the descriptors.
1. Outline
2. Overview
3. Notes
4. Revision Notes
5. Answers
24
Notes
i. It must be original and not copied directly from any part of a book.
ii. Quotation from books is noted as plagiarism even if quotation and references
are provided.
iii. A maximum of 20% similarity rate is acceptable.
iv. The Instructor may request participants to refer to the extra materials.
v. There must be a consistency in the slides, module outline and descriptors.
Summary
The module submitted would be sent for a review to the evaluation panel.
The main objective of the review committee is to upgrade the quality of
the materials.
In addition, the course writer is required to review the materials every three
years. Resubmission and revision must be approved by the panel of reviewers.
25
Humanology Sdn Bhd (1224424-D)
26
www.hba.com.my www.fb.com/HumanologySB/