Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Attitudes
Attit
Attitudes:
d : E l ti
Evaluating th
the
Social World
Attitude Formation
Attitude Functions
Persuasion
Cognitive Dissonance
Attitudes
Attitudes: evaluations of
Attitudes: various
aspects of the social world
The study of attitudes is a major topic
within the field of social psychology
They represent a very basic component of
social cognition
g
They often influence behavior, especially
when they are strong, accessible, and long-
long-
standing
t di
Attitude Formation
Observational Learning
Attitude Formation
Classical Conditioning
Conditioning:: learning in which one
stimulus becomes a signal for the presentation of
another stimulus (learning by association)
Subliminal Conditioning:
Conditioning: classical conditioning of
attitudes by exposure to stimuli that are below
individuals’ threshold of conscious awareness
Attitude Formation
How Attitudes Develop
Instrumental Conditioning
Conditioning:: learning in which
responses (e(e..g., attitudes) that lead to positive
outcomes or which avoid negative outcomes are
strengthened
Observational Learning:
Learning: learning in which
individuals
d d l acquire new forms f off behavior
b h ( .g.,
(e.
(e
attitudes) as a result of observing others
Media exposure can influence attitude formation
Third-Person Effect
Third-
Social Comparison
Attitude Functions
Attitudes serve manyy functions
functions..
The Knowledge Function:
Function: attitudes aid in the interpretation of
new stimuli and enable rapid responding to attitude attitude--relevant
information (in ways that maintain them)
The Identity or Self
Self--Expression Function
Function:: attitudes can permit
the expression of central values and beliefs and thereby
communicate personal identity
The Self
Self--Esteem Function:
Function: holding particular attitudes can help
maintain
i t i or enhance
h f li
feelings off self
self-
lf-worth
th
The Ego
Ego--Defensive Function:
Function: claiming particular attitudes can
protect people from unwanted or unflattering views of
themselves
The Impression Motivation Function
Function:: people can use attitudes to
lead others to have a positive view of themselves themselves.. When
motivated to do so, the attitudes people express can shift in
order to create the desired impression on others
Attitude Formation and
Functions
What are your thoughts?
What are examples of attitudes that people
learn from the media?
Are there problems with learning attitudes from the
media?
If so,
so what are they?
What functions do your attitudes serve?
Are p people
p always y aware of whyy theyy hold the
attitudes that they do?
What are consequences of not being aware of these
functions?
Link between Attitudes and
Behavior
Role of the Social Context
Social attitudes do not always predict
behavior
LaPiere (1934
1934)) found that the actions of business
owners did not match their attitudes
Businesses gave the Chinese couple traveling with him
very good service
But, they expressed negative attitudes in written
responses to LaPiere, saying that they would not offer
service to Chinese customers
Link between Attitudes and
Behavior
When and Why Do Attitudes Influence
Behavior?
Situational constraints that affect attitude
expression
People’s assumptions about the attitudes of others
and what they think others will think of them can
be better predictors of behavior than their actual
attitudes
D
Due t pluralistic
to l li ti ignorance
i , people
l can be
b wrong about
b t
what attitudes they think others hold
Strength of attitudes
Strong attitudes are better predictors of behavior
than are weak attitudes
Link between Attitudes and
Behavior
When and Why Do Attitudes Influence
Behavior?
Attitude extremity
An important factor in determining attitude
intensity is vested interest
Role of personal experience
Direct experience with an attitude object/issue
results in a stronger link between the attitude and
behavior
Attitudes formed by direct experience are more accessible
Accessible attitudes are more likely to determine
behavior
Link between Attitudes and
Behavior
Link between Attitudes and
Behavior
How Do Attitudes Guide Behavior?
Attitudes arrived at through reasoned thought
Theory of Reasoned Action (Fishbein & Azjen, Azjen
1980)): the decision to engage in a particular
1980
behavior is the result of a rational process in which
behavioral options are considered, consequences or
outcomes of each are evaluated, and a decision is
reached to act or not to act
That decision is reflected in behavioral intentions, which
strongly influence overt behavior
Link between Attitudes and
Behavior
How Do Attitudes Guide Behavior?
Theory of Planned Behavior
Behavior:: in addition to attitudes
toward a given behavior and subjective norms
about it, individuals also consider their ability to
perform the behavior (perceived behavioral control)
This theory is an extension of the theory of reasoned
action
Behavioral intentions are determined by attitudes toward
a behavior,
behavior subjective norms,
norms and also perceived
behavioral control
Link between Attitudes and
Behavior
How Do Attitudes Guide Behavior?
Attitudes and spontaneous behavioral
reactions
Attitude-to-
Attitude- to-Behavior Process Model (Fazio,
1989)): emphasizes the influence of attitudes and
1989
stored knowledge of what is appropriate in a
given situation on an individual
individual’ss definition of the
present situation, which then influences overt
behavior
E
Events
t automatically
t ti ll trigger
ti attitudes
ttit d and
d social
i l norms
Link between Attitudes and
Behavior
What are your thoughts?
What is an example of a particularly strong
attitude that yyou hold?
What accounts for pluralistic ignorance, people’s
false belief that others have different attitudes
than they do?
Can you think of an example where your attitude
was inappropriate because you had the wrong
perception of a situation?
Persuasion
Heuristic Processing
Processing:: involves the use of simple rules
or mental shortcuts (argument strength does not
matter)
Peripheral Route (to persuasion)
Persuasion
According to the elaboration
elaboration--likelihood model
(Petty & Cacioppo, 1986
1986)) persuasion can occur
in two ways
Persuasion
Resisting Persuasion
Reactance: negative reactions to threats to
Reactance:
one’s personal freedom
often
ft increases
i resistance
i t t persuasion
to i and d can even
produce negative attitude change or that opposite to
what was intended
is one reason why hard
hard--sell persuasion attempts
often fail
Forewarning: advance knowledge that one is
Forewarning:
about to become the target of an attempt at
persuasion and increases resistance to the
persuasion
i that
h follows
f ll
Provides opportunity to develop counterarguments
Persuasion
Resisting Persuasion
Selective Avoidance
Avoidance:: tendency to direct attention
away from information that challenges existing
attitudes
attitudes, which increases resistance to
persuasion
In addition,, p
people
p seek information consistent with
their attitudes (selective exposure)
Inoculation
E
Exposure t arguments
to t opposed d to
t one’s
’ attitudes,
ttit d
along with arguments that refute these
counterattitudinal positions, can strengthen people’s
original
i i l attitudes
ttit d
Persuasion
What are your thoughts?
Do most voters take the central route or the
peripheral route when listening to the
persuasive messages of political candidates?
What determines which route people take?
What are the consequences
q for the p
political p
process
of taking the central route or the peripheral route?
Are fear-
fear-based persuasive appeals effective at
changing attitudes and related behavior?
What factors are important to consider when using
fear?
Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance
Dissonance:: an (unpleasant) internal
state which results when individuals notice
inconsistency between two or more attitudes or
between their attitudes and their behavior
Can result in attitude change
People are motivated to reduce cognitive dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance
Direct methods of dissonance reduction
reduction::
Change attitudes or behavior to be consistent with
each other
Acquire information that supports attitude or
behavior
Engage
g g in trivialization of the inconsistency,y,
concluding that the attitudes or behaviors are
unimportant
Is dissonance
d a universall human
h experience?
Dissonance is universal, but the factors that produce
it and its magnitude are influenced by cultural
factors
The spreading of alternatives (when making a decision
people
l tend
t d to
t downplay
d l the
th item
it th did nott choose
they h andd
promote the item that they did choose) effect was found to
be stronger for Canadian students than for Japanese
students (Heine & Lehman,
Lehman 1997
1997))
Cognitive Dissonance
Dissonance
sso a ce and
a d attitude
att tude cchange
change:
a ge: The
eeeffects
ects o
of
Induced or Forced Compliance
Dissonance and the less
less--leads-
leads-to-
to-more effect
Cognitive Dissonance
Whene dissonance
d sso a ce iss a too
tool for
o be
beneficial
e c a cchanges
a ges
in behavior
Dissonance can promote positive behavioral changes,
especially when it generates hypocrisy
hypocrisy:: publicly
advocating some attitudes or behavior and then
acting in a way that is inconsistent with these
attitudes or behavior
For maximum effectiveness of this tool:
tool:
People must publicly advocate the desired behaviors
People
l must be
b induced
d d to think
h k about
b their
h own failures
f l
to engage in these behaviors in the past
People must be given access to direct routes to
dissonance reduction
Cognitive Dissonance
What are your thoughts?
What are the factors that increase the
likelihood that someone will experience
cognitive dissonance?
Why are people motivated to reduce cognitive
dissonance?
Why may dissonance be felt more strongly in
individualist cultures than in collectivist
cultures?
How could dissonance be used as a tool to
promote behaviors that conserve energy and
environmental resources?