Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
A C A S E S T U DY R E V I E W
P R E S E N T E D B Y J AYA N N WA LT E R S
U N I V E R S I T Y O F T E C H N O L O G Y, J A M A I C A
FA C U LT Y O F E N G I N E E R I N G A N D C O M P U T I N G
WHAT IS THE QUEUING THEORY ?
• Important part of operations and a valuable tool
for the operations manage
• Useful in both manufacturing and service areas
• Analysis of queues in terms helps us to understand service
systems , maintenance activities, and shop-floor control
activities.
Arrivals or inputs to the system. These have
characteristics such as population size, behavior,
and a statistical distribution. THE THREE
PARTS OF A
Queue discipline, or the waiting line itself.
Characteristics of the queue include whether it QUEUING
is limited or unlimited in length and the
discipline of people or items in it. SYSTEM
The service facility. Its characteristics include its
design and the statistical distribution of service
times.
QUEUING SYSTEMS
MEASURING THE QUEUE’S PERFORMANCE
Probability of a
Probability that
Utilization factor specific number of
the service facility
for the system. customers in the
will be idle.
system.
MODEL A (M/M/1): SINGLE-CHANNEL QUEUING MODEL
Service times vary from one customer to the next and are independent of
one another, but their average rate is known.
• The data collected are throughput rate number of operator, and number
of parts that arrives and leaves during part processing. Data for the
number of parts that arrives and leaves are
• Collected at least at amount of ten samples to make the data is possible
to be analyzed by Chi-Squared Goodness Test.
• Based on the system’s arrival and service pattern, and the assumptions
made during data collection, the M/M/1 queuing system was used to
analyze the data collected using Micro Soft computer package.
METHODOLOGY
• 1. Select a production line to be studied.
• 2. Collect data for each workstation.
• 3. Analyze the arriving and leaving data by Chi-Squared
Goodness Test to determine its variable distribution
(Exponential or Poisson distribution).
METHODOLOGY
• 4. Conduct performance measures of each workstation by using
equations based on Queuing theory.
• The performance measures need to be measured are:
• utilization factor (ρ), percentage of workstation idle time,
• number of parts in system ( s L ),
• number of parts in queue ( q L ), w
• waiting time spent in queue ( q W ),
• waiting time spent in system ( ), and task time.
METHODOLOGY
• 5 Determine the efficiency of each workstation.
• 6. Make validation of the task time value resulted
at step (4) by comparing it with the task time
value based on the company database.
RESULTS
RESULTS
RESULTS
OPTIMIZATION/ IMPROVEMENTS
• Increasing the number of operators that manually operate this
workstation from 5 to 10
• Efficiency of this workstation was only 37.78% when it was
operated by five operators and 99.94% when it was operated
by ten operators.
OPTIMIZATION/IMPROVEMENTS
• Therefore, it is better for the company to hire at least ten
operators to get a maximum efficiency. As informed before,
currently there are 5 workers.
LIMITATIONS/CHALLENGES
Ten additional operators were recommended but the researchers did not do a cost
analysis or analyzed how this would impact operating cost of the company as it may be a
constraint .
Model was purely analytical in nature and did not incorporate any simulation models that
is often used with Queuing theory
One of Few Research that conducted analysis in Multi Stage Production Line so limited
literature was available on topic
Insufficient data given re application of chi squared method.
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Conduct Cost Analysis of System to ascertain impact of hiring
5 new operators on business model
• Conduct model to account for transient behavior
• Employ simulation in model.
• More research needs to be contacted in the are of multistage
Production line queuing.
PERSONAL REFLECTIONS/OBSERVATIONS
• Reliability analysis was not taken into consideration , equipment downtime ,
equipment repair, maintenance and how it may affect the wait time if individual
tasks and total wait time
• Risk Analysis could have been conducted using Monte Carlo Simulation to get a
better understanding of the risks involved in each phase and how they impact
the total service time of the operations
• Sensitivity Analysis could then be conducted to indicate the binding constraints
and impact of each variable on total service time
•
PERSONAL
REFLECTIONS/OBSERVATIONS
• Operators are humans and the total service time between
operators may be different
• More operators does not mean the system will improve in that way
• Learning curve for new operators
• Individual assessment of each operators performance in
combination with a sensitivity analysis
• 99.4% efficiency – equipment fatigue
PERSONAL REFLECTIONS/OBSERVATIONS
• The study proved to be of value to the company as the
information will assess the company in future planning.