Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Philippines?
A. INTRODUCTION
Quo Vadis, Philippines? Where to, Philippines? Where to indeed? A very realistic
question most asked by the anxious Filipinos of today who witness the daily struggles of
their countrymen, their lawmen and, of course, their President. Where exactly is the
Philippines headed to? To eternal poverty? To a parliamentary administration? To a
country tossed carelessly into the hands of another ineligible leader? With the E-Vat law’s
implementation date drawing nearer as prices soar higher than ever and rallies, protests
and strikes sprouting up all over the country demanding the resignation and/or
impeachment of their President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, whose own impeachment case
proceeding is still under constant debate and contemplation in the hands of her
Congressmen. The destination of the Philippines is unclear; we might as well be heading
blindly into the eye of an upcoming economical typhoon for all we know. But first, let us
recap the ongoing political events in our country.
As we all know, a few months ago the President was accused of poll fraud with
the emergence of a tape containing a wire tapped conversation between the President and
a Comelec official by the name of Virgilio Garcillano, thus attaining its popular nickname
of “Hello Garci” tape or cd’s which were soon to follow. We also know that the
President’s list of allies are shortly wearing thin after ex-President Corazon Aquino
shifted her support to FPJ’s widow, Susan Roces and the Church calling for her
resignation as well as all the other opposition groups in the Philippines. Everyone’s
arguing and quarreling, making over dramatic scenes and statements on radio, television
or on the television, which are disastrously increasing the headaches of our Filipino
leaders. But, so far, it seems Gloria still holds the ace card of this political game though
many doubt she would still hold her position for very long.
Now, with her impeachment trial ongoing and the plan of directing our
government towards parliamentary horizons underway, it seems the President surely has a
lot of burdens on her shoulders. What exactly is behind these two very distinct plans that
could certainly make its mark in Philippine history and change the very core of our
government and its people? That is what you, the reader, will discover as you peruse
through this second part of our detailed informative composition delving through the very
heart of our country’s top stories and latest updates concerning the government and our
President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo.
So, with the President battling political, social, economical, and all other aspects
of her dwindling country, this question still hangs over the head of the sailors of this
Philippine steamship as they watch their Captain try to steer away from the oncoming
storm whilst battling her mutinous crew. Quo Vadis, Philippines? Where to, Philippines?
Where to indeed?
B. Body
----IMPEACHMENT----
What is Impeachment?
The word “impeach” comes from the Middle English “empechen” which means “to
impede” or “to accuse” and the Latin “impedicare” which means “to entangle” or “to put
in fetters.” The person impeached is not necessarily adjudged guilty as impeachment
only means that he has been formally charged of an impeachable offense but his
innocence or guilt is determined in a trial.
Process of Impeachment
The right to impeach public officials is secured by the U.S. Constitution in Article
I, Sections 2 and 3, which discuss the procedure, and in Article II, Section 4, which
indicates the grounds for impeachment: "the President, Vice President, and all civil
officers of the United States shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and
conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."
Since the Constitution does not describe the exact process for impeachment, these
procedures have evolved from experience. Today, the impeachment process begins if a
majority of members of the House of Representatives vote to authorize the House
Judiciary Committee to conduct an inquiry. After the committee conducts hearings and
examines evidence of alleged wrongdoing, the committee can vote to approve articles
(written charges) of impeachment. If a majority of the House of Representatives votes to
approve at least one article of impeachment, the case is referred to the Senate.
The presiding officer for the Senate trial—either the vice president or the chief
justice—administers an oath to the senators requiring them to act impartially as required
of jurors and judges in all court proceedings. The Senate convenes to hear the appointed
representatives from the House make the case for impeachment. In the two presidential
impeachment cases that have gone to a trial—those involving presidents Andrew Johnson
and Bill Clinton—the House of Representatives appointed representatives from the
Judiciary Committee to present the case for impeachment to the Senate. In turn, the
accused official and his or her representatives are allowed time to refute the charges in
oral arguments to the assembled senators. The Senate can call witnesses who may support
or refute the charges. The proceedings can be terminated at any time without a
determination of guilt or innocence if a majority of senators vote to end the trial. After all
of the evidence is heard and individual senators have made arguments for or against
removing the official, a vote is held on each of the articles of impeachment. If two-thirds
of the Senate votes to convict the official on any article of impeachment, he or she is
removed from office.
The standards for impeaching and convicting federal judges have traditionally
been lower than in impeachment cases involving presidents. Unlike elected officials,
judges are appointed for life and the only way to remove them is through an
impeachment proceeding. The electorate has no democratic way of removing a judge who
is incompetent or unfit to serve.
Impeachment is the process by which federal officials - such as judges and the
president - can be removed from office. The standard for impeachment is whether the
official has committed treason, bribery or "high crimes and misdemeanors."
House Judiciary Committee holds hearings on the alleged offenses and the
evidence supporting or against them. Witnesses can be called to testify. After weighing
the evidence, the committee votes whether to send articles of impeachment to the full
House.
The Senate then holds a trial of the impeached official. In the case of an
impeached president, the chief justice of the Supreme Court is the presiding officer. A
two-thirds majority is required to convict and remove the official from office.
----PARLIAMENTARY----
The term parliamentary system does not mean that a country is ruled by different
parties in coalition with each other. Such multi-party arrangements are usually the
product of an electoral system known as proportional representation. Parliamentary
nations that use first past the post voting usually have governments composed of one
party. The United Kingdom, for instance, has not had a coalition government since World
War II. However, parliamentary systems of continental Europe do use proportional
representation, and it seems that PR voting systems and coalition governments usually go
together. This system may also be heeded for governance in local governments. An
example is the city of Oslo, which has an executive council as part of a parliamentary
system.
Because the executive is directly related to the legislature, some argue the
executive is actually more accountable than many fixed term presidential systems, as the
executive, being linked to the legislative, can face an early election in the face of the
aforementioned 'vote of confidence'. In addition, because the executive is usually part of
the legislature, they often face more direct questioning by opposition politicians as
members of that legislature. In a presidential system, the legislative branch usually has
few chances to directly question the president. It can also be argued that it's relatively
easier to pass legislation within a parliamentary system, since the executive and
legislative branches are more dependent on each other than in a system with a completely
separated executive. Within presidential systems, the executive is often chosen
independently from the legislature. If the executive is of a different party from those
leading the legislature, then stalemate can occur.
Parliamentary systems vary as to the degree to which they have a formal written
constitution and the degree to which that constitution describes the day to day working of
the government. Also, depending upon the voting system, they vary as to the number of
parties within the system and the dynamics between the parties. Relations between the
central government and local governments vary in parliamentary systems; they may be
federal or unitary states.
instant and direct contact with MP-s (Member of Parliament) and committee and
faction advisers;
economic efficiency, the relatively miniature expenditures for the state budget;
effective use of electronic and other information sources outside the parliament;
the ability to adjust working priorities to the demands of legislation;
indispensable co-operation with other I&R units from the central government,
universities, local governments, NGO-s, colleagues of other parliaments etc;
all advisers have the professional right and responsibility to make proposals to
parliamentary committees, if their analytical decision-making is transparent and
correct;
small organisations are able to adapt to new concepts, organisational reforms etc
more quickly.
One major difference between the Westminster system and the types of
parliamentarism used on the Continent and in non-Commonwealth monarchies outside of
Europe is the voting system. Most Westminister systems use a kind of voting system, as
mentioned above, known as "first past the post." In first past the post, each district elects
one representative and that representative can be elected with a plurality. All Continental
parliamentary systems use some kind proportional representation, usually the list system.
First past the post favors a two-party system, proportional representation favors a multi-
party system.
Other differences arise over the power of the cabinet relative to the rest of the
assembly. France's Third and Fourth Republics were parliamentary, but most of the public
policy impetus came from the assembly, not the cabinet - the so called "regime
d'assemble." France's system was also disorganized compared to Britain's.
Several nations that are considered parliamentary actually have presidents who
are elected separately from the legislature and who have certain real powers. Examples of
this type of governance are Ireland and Austria. In both of these nations, there is a
tradition for the president to not use his powers. France's Fifth Republic has a separately
elected president who has a large role in government, but who is constitutionally weaker
than presidents in Ireland and Austria.
drama can only make hypothesis and (Hayatt 10) accused Malacanang of
predictions as what more is to come. having a hand in the endorsement of
the impeachment complaint filed by
We really don’t know if Dinky private lawyer, Oliver Lozano, which
Soleman is telling the truth. We think the opposition branded as sham.
this is another attempt on the
opposition’s part to bring down the In an interview Dinky Soleman
Arroyo administration. claimed that she had heard the
President instructed the presidential
Well I think this is a planned out ploy adviser for political affairs, Gabriel
for PGMA’s downfall. Pulling the Claudio to endorse Lozano’s
President out of power and discredity complaint. The said Complaint is said
impeachment process has become a to be a ploy which was agreed to be
singular obsession by the former immediently be trashed.
cabinet members.
The first two complaints have been There are three complaints being filed:
regarded as insufficient and weak by The first complaint filed by Lawyer
the house of representatives, and the Jose Rizaldo, is too weak to go to the
impeachment is now dependent on the Full House of Representative. The
outcome of the third complaint second complaint by Oliver Lozano
Because of this, we believe that the was accused as a sham. Lastly the third
opposition is doing everything they can complaint, the amended Lozano
just to push forth the impeachment complaint, initially endorsed by 41
hearing. Shouts, harsh statements, and congressmen from the minority and
violent physical contacts inside the party list group
house, just shows that the opposition’s
desperate moves. According to the constitution, only one
impeachment complaint can be given
The opposition, is so pressured to the due course in a year. The Constitution
extent that they come up with gig or only allows one impeachment
new cases in order for the complaint a year against an official.
impeachment to go on. Like the walk-
out, funded rallies, etc...
Sooner or later, we believe that the Arroyo camps estimates her opponents
truth will prevail together with the 79 have fewer than 50 supporters.
votes. But as you see, the truth we are
looking for shall be delayed due to the The opposition would need 79 votes in
number of congressmen who signed the Full House- 1/3 of the membership
still isn’t enough. to send the complaint to the senates for
trial.
Because of such situation, I think the During the impeachment proceedings
walkout appeared to have been some members of the House justice
planned, since the opposition House committee threw papers into the air as
members do not have any hard they stormed from their seats when the
evidence to support their complaints. chairman, Rep. Simeon Datumanong,
Maybe they think their poor acting of tried to cut off debate for a vote on
tossing the papers and walking out will which one of the three impeachment
save them from further embarrassment complaints against Arroyo should be
and to prolong the impeachment considered.
hearing.
The people seem to be divided on Sen. Aquilino Pimentel, for one, wants a
the form of government that federal form of government set up.
should be installed. Some may
favor a parliamentary form of So do many people in Mindanao. They
government, but others want a believe that federalism is the best solution to
federal form of government. the problems in Mindanao.
We should first take time to
review the facts about which form
Opinion Proof
of government will be better suited
for our country to promote growth.
Our very own Cebu may benefit Since Cebu is one of the economically stable
greatly from this change in cities in our counrty, we will be able to earn
government. more and keep a bigger share of our
earnings. New laws can be made to increase
We may be able to benefit from our cities income.
this and improve our city even
better.
It will be easier for us to tell who is There will be fewer politicians so one can
responsible for inaction unlike in a easily pinpoint who is lying or not.
Presidential System. Therefore, Also, in a Parliamentary System, the prime
there would be lesser graft and minister (chief executive) is often
corruption and lesser stealing from questioned by the legislature. This
the people. procedure would ensure us that the chief
executive is held to account and would act
as a check on his power.
Although, we should keep in mind the It is evident that Filipinos still need a
fact that our country may not be mature lot to learn about the maturity of a
enough to undergo the makings of a country and its government. A palpable
parliamentary government or any type proof is by the comparison of two
of government aside from our present countries, the United States of America
one for that matter. and the Philippines. Americans know
how, where and when to stage a protest
But still, great things start from small demanding injustice or else other
steps. At least we are doing something, inequitable matters that needs to be
taking a step forward in building our attended to by their government. They
Ideal Philippines and make it more know how to accept defeat and they
refined than ever. certainly don’t go gallivanting into the
streets every time they’ve been
wronged or their proposals don’t go the
way they want it to go, unlike the
Filipinos. Our immaturity is displayed
nearly every single day, so clearly that’s
proof enough to say that we may not be
ready.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/net/2004/07/03/stage.set.for.shift.to.parliamentar
http://www.newsflash.org/2004/02/hl/hl100604.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliamentary_system#Criticisms_of_parliamentaris
m
http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/dav/2003/01/29/oped/cris.g..sienes.html
http://www.inq7money.net/breakingnews/view_breakingnews.php?yyyy=2003&
mon=01&dd=04&file=1
http://www.grohol.com/wiki/Parliamentary_system
http://www.1-helmets.com/articles/Parliamentarism
http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/encyclopedia/p/pa/parliamentary_system.htm
http://www.citizensassembly.bc.ca/public/learning_resources/glossary/2003/cshar
man-10_0312241107-537