Heart Rate Monitor and Data Acquisition System

By

Bill Leece
Sofoklis Nikiforos

ECE 345
Section G
TA: Ajay Patel
August 2, 1999
Project # 1
 ABSTRACT
The heart rate monitor consists of biopotential electrodes that are placed on the patient. Body

fluids conduct electrical signals from the surface of the heart to the electrodes. Measurements are taken

as the difference between two electrodes, while a third electrode is used as a reference. The ECG

amplifier circuit then amplifies the signal and sends the information to a PC (via a data acquisition

circuit). The information is then analyzed and processed by a LabVIEW program. The user-friendly

interface allows for the cardiologist to analyze the patient’s electrocardiogram. The LabVIEW program

goes beyond that of a regular ECG in that it provides information such as heart rate, caloric expenditure,

and minimum and maximum target heart rates for optimal calorie burning.

ii
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………………..1

2. DESIGN PROCEDURE……………………………………………………………………………….4

2.1 Electrode Theory…………………………………………………………………………………...4

2.2 Hardware Design Procedure……………………………………………………………………….5

2.3 Software Design Procedure………………………………………………………………………..9

2.4 NI-DAQ Data Acquisition Board………………………………………………………………...10

3. DESIGN DETAILS………………….……………………………………………………………….11

3.1 ECG Design Details……….……………………………………………………………………..11

3.2 LabVIEW Design Details………………………………………………………………………...13

3.2.1 HRM Front Panel VI………………………………………………………………………...13

3.2.2 ECG Calorie Counter VI…………………………………………………………………….13

3.2.3 Timing Circuit2 VI………………………………………………………………………….14

3.2.4 Counter VI…………………………………………………………………………………..15

4. DESIGN VERIFICATION….………………………………………………………………………..17

4.1 Hardware Design Verification……………………………………………………………………17

4.2 Software Design Verification…………………………………………………………………….17

5. COST Analysis…………………………….…………………………………………………………19

6. CONCLUSION…………………….…………………………………………………………………20

7. Appendix……………………….……………………………………………………………………..22

8. REFERENCES……………………….………………………………………………………………23

iii
iv
 INTRODUCTION
Many hospitals and health clinics use monitoring devices to ensure patients will receive the

proper care. Electronic medical devices provide a vast array of medical information while allowing the

patient to have a user-friendly interface. The heart rate monitor built for the ECE 345 Senior Design

Project demonstrates this trend in medical technology towards easier and more effective tools for health

care. The project is based on the ECG, which is a simple monitor that displays the electric signals from

the heart.

The heart rate monitor receives its input from physiological signals from the electrical pulses of

the heart. The signals are fed into a system that implements both hardware and software to displays and

amplified and filtered version of the signal while performing real time calculations to display pertinent

information related to heart rate. The hardware for the system includes three Silver/Silver-Chloride

electrodes and a differential biopotential instrumentation amplifier. The differential amplifier is

designed to minimize common mode gain, which should be within about thirty percent of signal

variation. The preamp and the difference amplifier are designed to provide a dc-coupled stage gain of

approximately 25  1% when cascaded in series. This minimizes the chance of the amplifiers saturating

in the power amplification stage by any offset voltages produced by the electrodes. The software

acquires data from the output of these amplifiers continuously. LabVIEW then stores the information in

buffers, while simultaneously displaying and processing the signal. When these design considerations

are undertaken, the heart rate monitor is a reliable and marketable product.

The figure 1.1 on the next page shows the block diagram of the system and its major subsections.

The four subsections and their function are discussed in detail below.

1
In p u t S i g n a l f r o m N I- D A Q L a b V IE W
E C G A m p lifie r
E le c tro d e L e a d s (P C In te rfa c e ) S o ftw a re

Figure 1.1 Block Diagram

The first stage of the system consists of the three Ag/AgCl electrode sensors. These electrodes

produce a voltage related to the electric field produced by the beating of the heart.

The second stage of the system consists of the amplifier hardware, which takes the

electrocardiogram signal from the electrodes as its input. The signal is amplified and filtered to provide

a meaningful output. The hardware diagram on the next page (figure 1.2) shows the three stages of the

amplifier, and a driven right leg circuit. The output signal from this stage is then sent to the NI-DAQ

which in turn sends this analog data to LabVIEW for data processing.

Input Right
from Leg
Right Circuit
Leg
Bandpass
Input Pre Filter Output
from Am and to
Electrodes p Power PC
Amplifier

Figure 1.2 Hardware Diagram

2
 The fourth and final stage of the system is the software implementation, using the NI-DAQ board

and LabVIEW software. The NI-DAQ sends data from the ECG amplifier to a PC. The LabVIEW

software is then able to process this data. VIs (virtual instruments) are graphical programs that are

implemented to graph the data, and to process it (to make calculations for heart rate and caloric

expenditure ). The front panel of a LabVIEW program is a GUI that takes user profile inputs and uses

this data for calculations.

3
 DESIGN PROCEDURE

Electrode Theory

An interface is necessary between the body and the electronic measuring device when recording

potentials and currents in the body. Biopotential electrodes produce small voltages directly related to

the changing electric field produced by a beating heart.. The Ag/AgCl electrode is a practical electrode

that approaches the characteristics of a perfectly nonpolarizable electrode. Perfectly nonpolarizable

refers to the freedom of ions to pass through the electrode-electrolyte interface to be transduced into an

electrical current. The electrode converts the ionic current produced by the body into a voltage, and the

ECG amplifies this voltage.

The electrode-electrolyte interface is the junction where the ionic transfer occurs. A temporary

current is induced in the electrode from the changing electric field of the beating heart. This current

causes electrons and anions to move across the electrode-electrolyte interface in the direction opposite to

the flow of the current, and for cations to migrate across this interface in the direction of the current.

This temporary separation of charge produces a temporary potential. This potential is created from a

current induced from the heart and is thus directly related to the changing electric field produced by a

beating heart. The ECG circuit hugely amplifies the potential, and the output gives the electric

characteristics of a beating heart.

Another sensor that was considered was the piezoelectric sensor. Piezoelectric materials

generate an electric potential when mechanically strained. During a heart beat, the pressure in the blood

vessels is higher than when the heart is in its resting stage. This higher blood pressure causes a physical

4
deformation in the skin, and thus a piezoelectric sensor can produce an electic potential during every

heartbeat. The principal reason why the piezeoelectric sensor is less than ideal is that it is pressure

sensitive. In order to pick up a signal the nurse or doctor would have to press the sensor hard against the

patient which could cause a permanent deformation of the piezoelectric material This information,

combined with the fact that hospitals across the nation use Silver/Silver Chloride sensors, made it

obvious that the silver-silver chloride sensors were the best to use for this project.

Hardware Design Procedure

The hardware design for this project consisted of building an electrocardiograph (ECG) amplifier

circuit. The Silver/Silver Chloride electrodes produce induced voltage signals from the heart and the

ECG circuit amplifies and filters these signals. Furthermore, the ECG circuit should be able to correctly

amplify signals from a patient, even though the patient might not be grounded due to displacement

currents flowing to and from their body.

The ECG circuit has a number of component parameters that must be met in order for it to

operate effectively. First, an important factor for amplifiers is that the first stage (the preamplifier) must

have high input impedance and low input bias current. High input impedance is necessary in an

amplifier circuit to minimize loading effects. Loading occurs when the gain of the second stage of an

amplifier affects the gain of the preamplifier. A low input impedance can cause loading, thereby

affecting the characteristics of biopotential electrodes. This loading can result in a distortion of the

output signal.

Another factor that can cause the distortion of the output signal is the input bias current of the

op-amps. Input bias current is the amount of current that flows into the op-amp. Ideally, the input bias

current is zero, but in practice there is always a small input bias current. Low resistance between the op-

5
amp inputs compared to the feedback resistance can cause bias currents, so large resistors are placed

between op-amp inputs to minimize this current. Furthermore, the input bias current of the 741 op-amp

was found to be significantly higher (800 nA) when compared to the 411 op-amp (200 pA).

For this reason, 411 op-amps were used in the ECG circuit instead of the more traditional 741 op-amps.

Another important characteristic of the ECG amplifier circuit is that it must have a high gain

since biopotentials are usually on the order of millivolts. These signals must be amplified to a degree

such that they are capable of being effectively displayed on recording devices. This means that the

signals will have to have a magnitude on the order of volts, so gains of approximately 1000 are need for

the ECG circuit.

Finally, the ECG circuit must have the ability to filter out low and high frequency noise. Since

biopotentials signals from the heart are in the range of 0.05-150 Hz, the final stage of the ECG amplifier

should contain a bandpass filter suited to pass these frequencies but to cut off all others. This frequency

response can be achieved by adjusting resistor and capacitor values in the third stage of the amplifier

according to the equation (1) below:

fc = (2RC)-1 (1)

The design of the ECG amplifier was modeled after the amplifier presented in Medical

Instrumentation by John G. Webster [3] (see figure 2.1)

6
 Figure 2.1 ECG Amplifier

The actual design of the ECG amplifier differed slightly than the one presented by Webster in

that resistors and capacitors were added in parallel to the non-inverting terminals of the preamplifier in

order to reduce electromagnetic noise and to minimize input bias currents, and thus minimize loading.

The figure doesn’t include electrode impedance, which was a factor in the output. It was decided after

some experimentation and research that some important high frequency effect should be displayed by
7
the ECG, so the high frequency cutoff was brought up to 121.3 Hz from 106.1 Hz (see table 2-1 below).

Furthermore, to eliminate some low frequency noise, the low frequency cutoff was raised from 0.05 Hz

to 1 Hz (see table 2-2). It should be noted that the Design Adjusted ECG cutoff frequencies are only

theoretical; in practice, variations in the actual impedance of resistors and capacitors can lead to cut off

frequencies slightly different than those listed below

Table 2-1 Low-pass filter data .

R11 C2 Time Constant  Frequency

ECG Amplifier 150 k 0.01 F 1.5 ms 106.1 Hz

From Webster
Design Adjusted 160 k 8200 pF 1.3 s 121.3 Hz

ECG amp

Table 2-2 High-pass filter data

R11 C2 Time Constant  Frequency

ECG Amplifier 3.3 M 1 F 3.3 s 48.23 mHz

From Webster
Design Adjusted 150 k 1 F .15 s 1.06 Hz

ECG amp

The overall gain of the ECG circuit can be calculated by multiplying the gain of each individual

stage of the ECG circuit.

The differential gain of the voltage followers (first stage) of the ECG circuit is:

Gd = (Vo1 – Vo2) / (V1 – V2) = (R1 + R2 + R3) / R2 (2)

8
The gain of the differential amplifier (stage 2) is:

G d = R5 / R 4 (3)

The frequency response of the high pass filter is:

Vout(j)= Vin (ZR / ZR + ZC) = Vo3 (jC1R8 / jC1R8 +1) (4)

This RC combination is a high pass filter since:

lim 0 (Vout) = 0

lim ∞ (Vout) = Vo3

The gain of the bandpass filter (final stage) is:

Gf(j) = (R11 + jC2R10R11) / R10(jC2R11+1) (5)

This RC combination is a low pass filter since:

lim 0 (Vfinal) = Vo3(R11/R10)

lim ∞ (Vfinal) = Vo3

Thus we see that low frequency signals are amplified in the final stage, while high frequency

signal pass through without amplification. The results of these equations (calculated by hand) were

verified by PSPICE.

Software Design Procedure:

9
 The software tool implemented for data acquisition is LabVIEW. LabVIEW was selected

instead of HPVEE because LabVIEW is a very versatile programming language that is based on C.

LabVIEW is a graphical programming language specially suited for data acquisition applications

because it contains libraries for DAQ card data acquisition, as well as for serial port and GPIB. The

LabVIEW programming language was also selected because it is very easy to debug due to the fact that

is a graphical (as opposed to text) programming language, and the programmer can actually watch data

“flow” through the LabVIEW software “circuit” and see where any programming inconsistencies might

lie. Finally, one of the authors is very familiar with LabVIEW, thus making it the logical choice for

data acquisition software.

The first version of the LabVIEW data acquisition program used the AI Sample Channel VI from

the National Instruments Analog Input Data Acquisition Library. After some testing it was discovered

that this was an inefficient data acquisition program since it would only acquire new data from the DAQ

once all the software functions in the data acquisition program had been completed. Since it takes a

finite amount of time for the software to run for each loop, it was discovered that using the AI Sample

Channel VI only allowed for data acquisition at a rate of about 30 samples/sec. Since the bandwidth of a

QRS complex is about 35 Hz, sampling at least 70 Hz was necessary to recover this complex, and

sampling at 242.6 Hz was necessary to prevent any type of aliasing in the 1.06 Hz – 121.3 Hz passband.

For this reason, the AI Read VI was selected for data acquisition since when used in conjunction with

the AI Config VI and the AI Clear VI, circular buffers could be set in memory that would allow the AI

Read VI to continuously acquire data. Thus data can be obtained without waiting for other software

operations to complete since new data could be written to the circular buffers in memory even if the

software is at a bottleneck. As such, the sampling rate can be easily set to 242.6 Hz (it is actually set to

256 Hz) and there is no aliasing of the output.

10
NI-DAQ Data Acquisition Board

A NI-DAQ AT-MIO-16 board is a 16-bit data acquisition device that is used as an interface

between the hardware ECG amplifier and the LabVIEW software that runs on a personal computer. The

NI-DAQ board allows analog input data to be written to the LabVIEW software. The only input channel

utilized was analog input channel 0. The figure .2.2 shown below is the pinout of the AT-MIO-16.

Figure 2.2 AT-MIO-16 Pinout

DESIGN DETAILS

ECG Design Details

The ECG was designed so that it would pass frequencies from 1 Hz - 125 Hz. In order to obtain

a bandpass filter with these characteristics, the actual values for the resistors and capacitors were
11
obtained and are listed in the high-pass characteristics listed in table 3.1, and low-pass filter

characteristic listed in table 3.2, using equation (1). As previously mentioned, the actual frequency

cutoff differs from the theoretical values due to the fact that resistors and capacitors are non-ideal and

may vary slightly from their listed values.

Table 3-1 Low-pass filter data

R11 C2 Time Constant  Frequency

159.9 k 8200 pF 1.3 s 129.34 Hz

Table 3-2 High-pass filter data

R8 C1 Time Constant  Frequency

147.6 k 0.9445 F .139 s 1.14 Hz

Furthermore the final gain of the ECG amplifier was set to 1815.34 thus enabling the ECG

circuit to amplify biopotential signals on the millivolt range to the volt range. The gain of stage one

was 12.13 obtained by using equation (2). The differential amplifier (stage two) had a gain set to 4.73

as calculated from equation (3). Finally, the gain of the bandpass filter (stage three, power amplifier)

was found to be 31.63 verified from equation (5) and the fact that the gain equation for the bandpass

filter reduces to Gf(j) = R11/ R10 at low frequencies.

Finally, the CMRR of the differential amplifier was maximized by setting R5 to 47 k This

value for R5 that maximizes the CMRR was experimentally determined using the equation CMRR = Gd /

Gc where Gd is the differential gain and Gc is the common mode gain. A variable resistor was used to

12
determine the value that minimized Gc and therefore maximized the CMRR. The value for R5 that

caused Gc to be minimized was 47 k Figure 3.1 shows the output of the difference amplifier of the

Webster circuit with the inputs having a common voltage (1 V p-p sine wave).

Figure 3.1 Common-mode Rejection Ratio

The differential gain Gd = 25.352 and the common-mode gain Gc = 151.54 E-6. The common-mode

rejection ratio is simply CMRR = Gd / Gc = 1.673 E5 (a high-quality biopotential amplifier should have a

CMRR at least 10,000). In terms of decibels, CMRR(dB) = 104.47.

LabVIEW Design Details

LabVIEW is a hierarchical programming language where the highest level Virtual Instruments

(called VIs) calls lower level VIs (referred to as subVIs). In order to view the LabVIEW programs used

for this project, access the project web page where the programs have been posted.

13
HRM Front Panel VI

The highest level VI is the HRM Front Panel VI. The user enters their age, weight, and resting

heart rate on the front panel of this VI. The user then presses “Continue”, which liberates the age,

weight, and resting heart rate data from the While Loop on the left, allowing to travel into the While

Loop on the right. At this point a message appears on the front panel informing the user of their

minimum and maximum target heart rate for maximum calorie burning. Once the user presses “OK” on

the message box, the age and weight information is liberated from the right While Loop and it “flows”

into the ECG Calorie Counter VI.

ECG Calorie Counter VI

The ECG Calorie Counter VI performs three functions. First, it performs real time graphing of

ECG data. Secondly, it is able to count the rising edges of a QRS complex from the heart. Finally, this

VI can also tell time, and is thus able to divide the number of heartbeats (found from the rising edge

detector) by the time that the program has been running. This results in data that can be scaled to give a

value for a patient’s heartbeats per minute. A final trivial point is that this VI can take age, weight, and

BPM data to give information on caloric expenditure.

The ECG Calorie Counter VI is able to display ECG information by continuously acquiring data

from the DAQ. Once the hardware has been configured and a buffer set by the AI Config. VI and the AI

Start VI begins the buffered analog input information, the AI Read VI can read the buffered

input data. The output of the AI Read VI is a 2-dimension array of data that is graphed on a strip chart

in real time. Once the data acquisition process is complete, the AI Clear VI stops the data acquisition

and releases associated internal resources such as buffers.

14
 Since the data acquisition process is faster than the software, the circular buffer is set in memory

so that data can be written to the buffer while the graphing process is executing. This way, data can be

acquired at the fastest possible rate, and thus no data is lost. For this program, the sampling rate was set

to 256 samples/sec. and the buffer size was set to 512. As a general rule, the buffer had to be about

twice the sampling rate in order for there to be no overflow.

As stated earlier, the ECG Calorie Counter VI also is able to keep time with the help of the

Timing Circuit2 VI. This VI makes use of the Tick Count (ms) function, which returns relative time

values in the software circuit. Thus the Tick Count function in the outermost While Loop can not tell

time, but the relative time difference between when it first executes and when the Tick Count function in

the inner While Loop allows differential time calculations to occur. Once data enters the outer While

Loop, its Tick Count is set, and the Tick Count value on the inner While Loop decrements with each

iteration of the While Loop. This gives a convenient measure of the time it takes for the inner While

Loop to execute. Once data exits the inner While Loop (this will occur whenever its Boolean Control

evaluates to false), the Tick Count of the outer While Loop will be initialized to a new value.

Timing Circuit2 VI

The Timing Circuit2 VI is able to keep the program “on time” but multiplying the total scan time

(which is determined by dividing the number of samples by the sampling rate) by the result the iteration

number divided by the number of points in a scan. This value is referred to as the goal time. The goal

time is then compared to the “differential time” determined by the Tick Count functions. If the program

is ahead of schedule, it will slow down by the amount that the program is ahead of schedule. If the

program is behind schedule, the amount of time that it is behind schedule can be added to the goal time

to give an “apparent time” that is correct. Thus, whether the scan parameters are difficult for the
15
program to meet or if they are easily met, the output “apparent time” will always be correct, even if the

program is unable to keep up. This allows the ECG Calorie Counter VI to calculate the heart rate in

beats per minute regardless of the fact that there may be certain experimental parameters that do not

allow the program to meet its time goals.

Counter VI

The Counter VI counts rising edges of the QRS complex to give beat count information needed

for BPM calculations. The Counter VI is able to effectively count noisy data by determining if the

average of a variable number of data points in an array are above a threshold voltage set for counting,

and if the average of the same number of previous data points is below this threshold. It was

experimentally determined that the maximum number of data points that could be averaged for counting

that wouldn’t give erroneous results was:

2[log2(number of data points)] – 1 (6)

It isn’t surprising that more data points can be used in averaging if there are more data points in a scan

since the ECG Calorie Counter VI samples the data that is sent to the strip chart. The data is a sampled

set of data of data that is a sampled from the output of the ECG circuit (at 256 Hz), so in effect, it is

sampled twice. With more data points, there is higher resolution in the sampled data, and thus more data

points can be looked at for threshold detection. If the number of data points to be looked at for threshold

detection is too high, then the criteria for counting will never be meet, and the heart beat counter will

always be zero.

One further criterion for counting is that heartbeats should only be counted after a FALSE 

TRUE transition. This is due to the fact that it is possible for the average of a certain number of points

is above the threshold level and the same number of previous points is below the threshold for multiple
16
interations of the While Loop. Thus, as shown in the Counter VI Diagram, heart beats will only be

counted when the threshold criteria has been meet and there is a FALSE  TRUE transition on

threshold detection output.

One question that still needs to be answered is why setting a finite number of points for array

operations is even necessary. The answer to this quesition is that if a very large number of array points

was set (100,000 for instance), and the outer While Loop of the ECG Calorie Counter VI was removed,

the VI would execute very slowly because it has a difficult time handling large numbers for array

operations. Furthermore, the program would have a finite run time before it would fail. In other words,

once all the array slots were filled, the program would no longer be able to count. Now the reason for

even having the outer While Loop becomes evident. With it, the programmer is able to set array sizes

that LabVIEW can easily handle (the default for the program is 2048 points) and these arrays reinitialize

every time the While Loop executes as many times as there are array points. Thus the advantage of this

system is that it allows for counting of rising edges of the QRS complex (since array data is needed to

look at past data and thus to assure the proper counting of heart beats) without slowing down the

software, and it also has the advantage that it can run indefinately.

One final point to mention about the ECG Calorie Counter VI is that the heart rate display in

BPM is the average of the BPM value over 256 iterations of the inner While Loop. This is done so that

the BPM output is readable since it may change on each While Loop iteration. When this happens the

output data appears to flicker on the screen since its value is changing every few milliseconds. With the

array averaging algorithm in place, the BPM output can only change every few seconds, making it much

easier to read.

17
 DESIGN VERIFICATION

Hardware Design Verification

Due to the fact that the license for PSPICE expired on Aug. 1st, it is impossible to access pictures

of the final ECG circuit and of the frequency response. Hardcopies of this data will be provided to the

TAs. From the Bode plot, it is simple to see that the gain of the ECG circuit is approximately 2,000

since a 1 V sine wave was applied as the input and the output magnitude peaks at approximately 2,000

V. Furthermore, from the Bode plot one can see that cutoff frequencies are at approximately1 Hz and

125 Hz. The calculated frequency responses and gains for each of the biopotential amplifiers that are

required according to their respective physiological input signals were given in chapter 2.2. Bode plots

were found to verify the instrumentation amplifier characteristics.

Software Design Verification

After each major section of the software was completed, a patient was connected to the ECG

amplifier to see if the components funtioned properly. The first component of the software to be

completed was the real time graphing of the ECG data. As previously mentioned, when the first version

of this program was tested, it was discovered that software bottlenecks only allowed for sampling at 30

Hz, so the output was highly distored. This problem was solved, as explained earlier, by use of circular

buffers and the AI Read VI.

The next major software component to be tested was the timing circuit. The timing circuit was

tested by running the program and a stopwatch simulaneaously and comparing the output of the two

timing devices after several minutes. The timing circuit was acurate to a value less than the human

error involved in trying to push two buttons simulaneously.

18
 The final major software component to be tested was the counter. The counter was tested by

determining if it could correctly count noisy low frequency that a human would also be able to count.

The count value that was obtained by the human counter was then compared to the value calculated by

the Counter VI, and it was determined that this VI was able to accurately count noisy low frequency

noise like heart beats.

The final software test was to see if the LabVIEW program could count pulses and

simultaneously keep time. This was done by applying low frequency sine waves that were not properly

grounded to the DAQ. The sine wave was purposely grounded improperly to simulate the type of noisy

ECG data that the LabVIEW program would encounter. Furthermore, once patients were hooked up to

the ECG circuit, their heart rate in BPM was determined manually and compared to the results from

LabVIEW. The LabVIEW results compared very well with those determined manually. Due to

space restrictions for this report, the LabVIEW code could not be included here. It has been uploaded to

the project web site, so the LabVIEW programs can be viewed from there.

COST ANALYSIS
The prototype cost analysis takes into account the price of the product we intend to market. Since it is
the prototype, the costs will be decrease due to mass production efficiencies. Some parts, such as the
19
disposable electrodes ( 3M Red dot) and software (LabVIEW) were donated, but the costs were still
figured in the prototype cost. The cost of the case of electrodes is estimated to be about $45 based on
market value price.

Labor

Typical EE entry salary $50,000/year * 1year/240 days * 1 day/8 hours = $26/hour

$26/hour x 2.5 x 120 hours = $7,800 (per person)

Total Labor $15,600

Parts

3M Red Dot Electrodes $ 45

Case (chassis) $ 10
Printed circuit board $ 100
411 Op amps, Resistors,
capacitors, leads, etc. $ 15
LabVIEW Software $ 995
NI - DAQ $ 795
________________
Total Parts $1,960

Grand Total = Total Labor + Total parts = $17,560

CONCLUSION

20
 The ECG Calorie Counter device was successfully developed. The ECG amplifier circuit was

able to amplify and filter a biopotential signal to make it suitable for display on LabVIEW while

preventing loading and protecting the patient from macroshock. Interface between the ECG hardware

and the LabVIEW software was successfully achieved by an AT-MIO-16 data acquisition card. The

LabVIEW program is able to sucessfully determine the frequency of a signal and convert that number

into beats per minute. This ability was successfully demonstrated when the LabVIEW program was able

to convert the frequency of input sine waves to cycles per minute by using the counting and timing

algorithm. Because LabVIEW was able to correctly count and time input data of a known frequency, it

can be assumed that it is also able to determine the beats per minute of a heart. Furthermore, BPM data

obtained with LabVIEW supported heart rate values obtained manually. Finally, the calorie counter was

able to sucessfully determine calories burned per hour and total calories burned through a simple

algorithm that calculated caloric expenditure as a function of age, weight, and heart rate.

The best way to test our project’s accuracy would have been to buy a cheap heart rate monitor

(such as one that comes on a watch) and to have compared the BPM data from this heart rate monitor to

the one that was constructed for this Senior Design project. Furthermore, although the output signal

from the ECG had very little noise due to the extra care taken to minimize noise, an even cleaner signal

could have been obtained in the ECG circuit was implemented on a PC board and enclosed in a Faraday

box.

If there had been more time avaliable to work on this project, a hardware version of the

LabVIEW program would have been a nice addition. Using a 555 timer circuit and modulo-6 and

modulo-10 counters would have allowed for heart rate display (in BPM) on an LED display. It would

have been interesting to see if the hardware output would have agreed with the software output, and this

addition would have given the authors some extra experinece in digital design.
21
APPENDIX A. TOLERANCE ANALYSIS
22
The bandpass filter of the ECG amplifier in the final circuit had values as follows: R11 = 159.9 k, R10 =

4.666 k , R8 =R9 =147.6 k, C1 = 0.9445 F, C2 = 7695 pF

Figure 7.1 Bandpass Filter

Figure 7.1 above shows the schematic of the bandpass filter (not labeled accordingly). The

resistor R11 was found that this gives a cutoff at 121.3 Hz. The PSPICE simulations were done to prove

experimental work. The acceptable values for the upper frequency are 100 Hz – 150 Hz. Solving these

boundary conditions we see that the acceptable range for R11 are from 137.89 k to 206.8 k. The

acceptable range for our high pass cutoff will be met as long as R11 = 159.9 k  1.16%.

Making the potentiometer R5 to 47 k solved the common-mode voltage problem discussed in the

design details. The SPICE simulations on the next page (figure 7.2) show that the acceptable range

before poor noise occurs is 47 k  5 %. The 5% variation will be in the acceptable range of CMRR

23
24
Figure 7.2 PSPICE Simulations of Common-mode voltages

References

25
[1] Health Resource Center at the McKinley Health Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-
Champaign, “Determining Your Target Heart Rate Range,” 1995,
http://www.uiuc.edu/departments/mckinley/health-info/fitness/exercise/targ-hea.html.

[2] National Instruments, LabVIEW User Manual, National Instruments Corporation, 1996.

[3] Webster, John G., Medical Instrumentation: Application and Design. 3rd Ed. Philadelphia: W.B.
Saunders Company, 1998.

26