Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Budget Browser
Combining Economy, Science and Innovation
for a better society
Foreword
It is with pleasure that I present to you this first edition of the EWI-Budget Browser, which is the successor
publication to the Science, Technology and Innovation Information Guides.
The EWI Department (Economy, Science and Innovation) integrates the Flemish science and innovation
policy with the economic policy. This new entity is one of the 13 policy domains of the Flemish
government, in conformity with the great restructuring project ‘Better Administrative Policy’ (BBB).
Exactly as in the former Science, Technology and Innovation Information Guides, you will find information
on figures and funds, explanations, analyses and trends etc. for the Flemish science and innovation policy
in the new EWI-Budget Browser. A new aspect is, of course, that you now also get the same relevant
information about the economic policy of the Flemish government. Such information is always based on
the expenditure budgets of the Flemish government.
Another important change, which is immediately noticeable, is the new format of the EWI-Budget
Browser. You will notice that, despite the addition of the section on the economy, it is clearly thinner
than the earlier editions. And yet, you therefore do not get less information. Quite to the contrary; the
EWI-Budget Browser that you hold in your hands is supplemented with still more detailed information
on the website www.ewi-vlaanderen.be/speurgids. There you can quickly call up precise data and
information in an easy manner. On www.ewi-vlaanderen.be you will also find more information about
EWI and our other publications: EWI Review, EWI Studies, etc. Do take a look at our website regularly,
so that you will always be up to date on the latest figures and news.
In short, with this Guide and our website, it will be easy to know everything about Economy, Science
and Innovation.
Last but not least, I would like to thank the many contributors who have made this edition possible.
Without their input, this EWI-Budget Browser would not have been realised.
Rudy Aernoudt
Secretary General EWI
foreword
Contents
Foreword
Contents 3
Concluding remarks 45
Used abbreviations 46
Contributors 47
Colophon 48
Contents
Positioning of the
EWI-Budget Browser
Part 1
Secretary General
Client-oriented Information-oriented
Office for
Policy support & Valorisation & Awareness rising Statistics &
policy research &
Academic policy Industrial policy & Society Indicators
Foresight studies
Part 2
Chapter 2.1
Besides this, the General Economic Policy programme has the sub-
sidiary objective of making the business community and consumers
aware of the necessity of striving for quality.
Funds 2007
The total budget, which is available to the General Economic Policy
programme in 2007 (budget programme 51.1), amounts to 25.928
million EUR. The breakdown of these funds is outlined in the table
below. The focus lies on the grants to VLAO (13.258 million EUR)
and to SERV (6.658 million EUR). A brief explanation of these two
Table 1: Funds programme of the
General Economic Policy 2007 funds is given below.
VLAO is also responsible for promoting designing, and for special More information is available on www.serv.be
tasks with regard to company management of (candidate) entrepre-
neurs and companies. For the promotion of designing, VLAO has
worked under the name ‘DESIGN VLAANDEREN’. 2.1.2. Economic support policy
1
As provided for in Article 5, §1, 1° to 3° of the foundation decree.
part 2 • ewi: co-operation between economy, science and innovation 11
Strategic objectives Funds 2007
The mission has been translated into the 3 strategic objectives. The total budget, which is available to the Economic Support Policy
1. Investment support, as a revised instrument for a policy designed 2007 (budget programme 51.2) amounts to 278.356 million euros.
to create the required economic conditions; The breakdown of these funds is outlined in the table below. The
2. Strengthening the regional and sub-regional dynamism, while focus lies on the Fund for Subsidiary Economic Support, the so-called
taking the individual characteristics of each sub-region into account; Hermesfonds, which is administered by the Economy Agency and
3. The promotion of more and better entrepreneurship, for starters, has a budget of 273.177 million EUR. The other BAs fall under the
growing companies and employees. EWI department.
Description Fund
(million EUR)
Article 41 § 9 of this programme decree provides that the Flemish Policy instruments
Government controls the operations and management of the Fund. The budget 2007 contains 273,177 million EUR, by means of an
It puts the necessary services, equipment, installations and personnel allocation authorisation (BA 99.11). The policy instruments of this
ParticipatieMaatschappij Vlaanderen NV (Participation Company Innovative start-ups with a high risk profile and strong growth
Flanders - PMV) potential can take up contact with, the Vlaams Innovatiefonds
ParticipatieMaatschappij Vlaanderen NV (Participation Company (Flemish Innovation Fund - Vinnof), to find risk capital.
Flanders) has taken over the role of GIMV, as the instrument for the
realisation of economic initiatives by the government in Flanders. As CultuurInvest grants companies in the cultural sector access to
an independent investment company, PMV has a unique position. It is risk capital, providing oxygen in this way to culturally engaged
not a bank, and it is not an administration. PMV is a company that in- entrepreneurs.
vests in the Flemish Region in a businesslike manner. PMV is a public
limited company, which has been capitalised by the Flemish Region. The Fonds Vlaanderen Internationaal (Flanders International Fund)
PMV does not use funds provided by the Flemish government. helps Flemish SMEs to cross borders.
PMV can, on the one hand, invest when private initiatives are not The NRC-Fonds offers high-technology companies long-term
forthcoming. After all, private capital providers often have qualms financing, for innovative projects that are connected to a specific
about participating in a company or project, because the expected end-product.
profit is too low, the possible risks are too high, or because the
investment period is too long. PMV-pps
The PMV-pps business unit lays a foundation, with which it is pos-
What is of primary importance for PMV is that the (company) projects sible to meet the quickly evolving expectations of our society by way
have a high potential for the future. In such cases, PMV will strive and of public-private co-operations. PMV-pps structures capital-intensive
as much as possible towards a co-financing with private parties. investment projects, which are part of the responsibilities of the
government, whereby the participation of private parties offers an
On the other hand, PMV can invest in projects that are a part of the important added value. For instance:
responsibilities of government (infrastructure facilities, the building • A new fleet of Flemish pilot vessels
of schools and hospitals, social housing, etc.), but where a participa- • Major infrastructure works
tion of private parties is either useful or desirable for: • The elimination of the ‘missing links’ in the Flemish road
• Realising the projects with a lower investments of government funds; infrastructure
• An improved distribution and management of risks; • Modernisation and renewal of our school infrastructure
• Being able to handle projects more efficiently. • Expansion and modernisation of the sports infrastructure
• And an increase in the offer of social housing
The participation of PMV offers private parties the guarantee that • Construction and renewal of hospitals
the rules of business economics are respected; for the government • Care structures for senior citizens
PMV offers the guarantee that its interests will also be observed. • The privatisation of the VRT broadcasting park
• An optimisation of the Flemish optical network
Furthermore, PMV offers the opportunity of realising a profit on
the money of the Flemish government. The objective is to increase PMV-Vastgoed (real estate)
the investment potential of PMV and the government, so that new By way of an active real estate management, PMV supports and
initiatives can be realised without outside investment. finances the real estate policy of the Flemish government. The
The activities of PMV have been assigned to four business units: PMV-Vastgoed business unit plays a pioneering role in the area of
public-private co-operation, and it is involved in the realisation of
PMV-kmo (PMV for SMEs) the three Flemish administrative centres, as well as in the valorisation
This business unit is the unique contact point for the financing of Flemish government buildings.
requirements of small and medium-sized companies. It manages a PMV also carries out a strategic real estate policy for the development
variety of instruments, which makes it easier for entrepreneurs to of brownfields, and it offers support for regional and inner-city
find financing with private capital providers. development projects
ARKimedes doubles the available risk capital that is available to PMV-Milieu&Energie (environment and energy)
young growth companies. The ARKimedes Fund, which is valued at This business unit supports a strategic investment policy in the area
110 million EUR, offers one euro extra for every euro that is invested of environmental protection and energy. Such investments after all
in a Flemish SME by private risk capital funds (ARKIVs). have a great impact on society, and they offer a new impulse for
Science and
innovation policy 2007
This chapter gives a precise overview of what the scientific and Administrative structures of the Flemish science policy
technological innovation policy consists of. We will use the interna-
tionally agreed definitions for this purpose: After all, to be able to Here we will provide a summary description of the administrative
make an international comparison, one has to keep to international structure for the management of the science policy. This structure
agreements. consists of:
As the social importance and the complexity of knowledge and The EWI Department, which is responsible for preparing policy initia-
technological developments increased, exactly as the interest and tives and policy evaluation for the entire policy domain.
participation by governments in an international context, the defini-
tions also evolved in conformity with changed circumstances. The The institutes:
technological policy was, after all, originally considered as a subsidi- • IWT Flanders: carries out policy related to industry. It is an inter-
ary sector, which was contained in the broader term science policy. mediary organ, which distributes the funds amongst businesses
Later on it was felt necessary to provide a separate description for and research institutes, in conformity with defined selection
this type of policy, which is directly connected with technological criteria, and evaluation and decision-making procedures.
development. The accent today lays rather on innovation and with
this the entirety of the activities that stimulate renewal in industry • FWO Flanders: carries out policy with regard to basic research at
and society is meant. the universities. It is an intermediary organ which distributes the
funds among the universities and research institutes. That happens
in conformity with defined selection criteria, and evaluation and
decision-making procedures.
Table 4: Overview of new policy resources and accents for the EWI science policy domain
71.1 12.07 Expenditures for promoting the Flemish information society, within the framework
of the Lisbon strategy 1
71.2 33.01 Strengthening of international co-operation 1
71.2 40.02 Further development of the Methusalem initiative 7
71.2 40.03 Additional Special Research Fund/Independent Academic Personnel (ZAP)
mandates at Flemish universitiess 1.5
71.2 41.02 Launch of the Hercules initiative for a heavy and medium heavy research infrastructure 5
71.2 41.03 Additional postgraduate mandates through the Fund for Scientific Research -
Flanders (FWO) 2.7
71.3 41.05 Strengthening of financing for interface services 0.6
71.3 99.11 Innovation initiatives at the suggestion of the Flemish government (competence centres) 6
71.3 99.12 Additional funds for the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and
Technology in Flanders (IWT), for projects that are proposed by Flemish companies 17
71.4 33.01 An increase in the grant for the Interuniversity Micro-Electronics Centre (IMEC) 2.75
71.4 33.02 An increase in the grant for the Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology (VIB) 6.3
71.4 33.04 An increase in co-financing for the support centre for R&D indicators 0.5
71.4 33.07 Financing of research activities at institutes for advanced education 0.5
71.4 41.04 Additional funds for the TETRA (technology transfer) fund 0.4
71.4 41.07 Financing for the ‘medical imaging processing’ cluster of IBBT 4.2
71.4 44.06 Strengthening of the research commitment in academic education at the universities 3
TOTAL 59.45
01.90 0.050 0.000 0.050 Expenditures for a stock take and valorisation of scientific and
technological research
12.01 0.996 0.000 0.996 Expenditures for the conception, preparation and execution of
scientific actions
12.03 1.532 0.000 1.532 Popularisation of science, technology and technological innovation
12.07 3.031 0.000 3.031 Expenditures for promoting the Flemish information society, within the
framework of the Lisbon strategy
12.20 0.240 0.000 0.240 Various communications initiatives, with regard to science, technology
and innovation
33.01 0.839 0.000 0.839 Various subsidies, with reference to publicising the Science Policy and
scientific research to structural partners
33.03 3.904 0.000 3.904 Subsidies to Flanders Technology International vzw (FTI vzw), a non-profit
foundation
33.04 2.374 2.374 0.000 Subsidy to the non-profit organisation Flanders DC vzw
40.01 2.019 0.000 2.019 Subsidies for expertise cells, with the objective of popularising science,
technology and technological innovation within associations
41.01 1.129 0.452 0.677 Subsidy to the Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for the Sciences and Arts
41.03 0.465 0.000 0.465 Grant to the Flemish Council for Science Policy
41.04 0.256 0.000 0.256 Subsidy related to the inventory of scientific and technological
research (IWETO)
41.06 2.231 2.231 0.000 A subsidy for the Flanders Technology Foundation (STV)
TOTAL 19.066 5.057 14.009
For the realisation, the following operational objectives have been The following table summarises all the funds (funds in million EUR)
given precedence: that have been a allocated within the programme for scientific
Qualitative objectives: research at the initiative of the researcher.
• An increase in the quality of fundamental research, through a
stricter selection of research proposals. The Fund for Scientific In 2007, too, FWO Flanders remains the most important item in the
Research - Flanders (FWO) assesses research projects and research budget, with a subsidy of 135.013 million EUR. Together with the
mandates on the basis of inter-university competitions, and by 2.342 million EUR from the National Lottery (currently still allocated
peer reviews of scientific commissions that have been assembled under BA 24.6 00.23), the total available budget for FWO Flanders
for the corresponding discipline. reaches 137.355 million EUR. That is an increase of 4.605 million
EUR in comparison to the year 2006.
• An increase in the scale and the internationalisation of fundamen-
tal research, through additional initiatives (see the Methusalem FWO Flanders is the channel that distributes research funds on the
and Odysseus programmes, BA 40.02 and 41.05). basis of interuniversity competitions, and also peer reviews that
12.24 0.116 0.116 0.000 Expenditures within the framework of international scientific co-operations
33.01 1.520 1.520 0.000 Subsidies within the framework of international scientific and innovative
cooperation
35.40 0.996 0.996 0.000 Subsidies to the United Nations University (UNU), within the framework of
the programme for regional integration studies
35.41 1.437 1.437 0.000 Subsidy to UNESCO, in support of the Flemish UNESCO science trust fund
40.02 10.043 10.043 0.000 Subsidy to the special research funds, which are part of the Methusalem
programme
40.03 1.500 1.500 0.000 Subsidy for special research funds, which provide additional mandates for
independent academic personnel
41.01 0.941 0.941 0.000 Subsidy to FWO Flanders, for projects within the framework of international
research facilities
41.02 5.000 5.000 0.000 Subsidy to the Hercules Foundation
41.03 112.531 112.531 0.000 Subsidy to FWO Flanders
41.05 12.171 12.171 0.000 Subsidy to FWO Flanders for the Odysseus programme
41.80 9.370 9.370 0.000 Allocation financed with the net receipts from profits in the National Lottery,
for the benefit of FWO Flanders
TOTAL 155.625 155,625 0.000
are conducted by scientific commissions, whose membership is The Flemish government has already taken a number of important
recruited from the corresponding discipline. Financing of fundamental initiatives in the past, for financing equipment at the expense of the
research that is initiated by researchers is, among other reasons due Financing Fund for One-off Investment Expenditures (FFEU). After all,
to its unpredictable character and its anchor function for the entire there had been no structural channel for easing the equipment needs
scientific establishment, a primary responsibility of the government. of the actors in the Flemish research sector. The Hercules Foundation
Additional, relevant information can be found on the website: was established in 2007 (BA 41.02), in co-operation with FWO and
www.fwo.be IWT, with the objective of providing structural financing of medium-
heavy and heavy research infrastructure at Flemish universities and
In 2005, extra funds were made available in FWO to award additional at Flemish institutes of higher education. Starting in 2007, the funds
doctorate mandates. In 2006, one still appropriated an extra 2.7 provided by the government will amount to 5 million EUR for larger
million EUR, in an attempt to achieve a success percentage of 35% equipment, and 10 million EUR that comes from previously appropri-
of applications. From this same viewpoint, 2.7 million EUR will once ated and saved funds of the basic subsidy of FWO for medium-sized
more be added in 2007, for the first batch of post-doctoral mandates. equipment.
The subsidy on BA 41.03 amounts to 112.531 million EUR.
The Methusalem programme (BA 40.02) represents a strengthening
The Odysseus programme is an initiative that was started up in of the BOF. The intention is to grant top researchers long-term and
2006. It is aimed at attracting Flemish and other top researchers from substantial programme financing (lump sum) at Flemish universities.
abroad, by providing them with start-up financing and putting them 3 million EUR were made available for this purpose in 2006. For a
in a position to build up research groups in Flanders, with the intention further expansion, 10.043 million EUR have been appropriated in the
of making them into leading scientific centres at an international level. budget for 2007, a structural increase of 7 million EUR.
The Odysseus programme is intended as project financing, which is
designed to attract Flemish and other scientists from abroad to Flanders. For the purpose of giving outstanding postdoctoral researchers an
The essence of this programme is that excellent researchers, who are academic career, whereby they can devote the first years after their
working in foreign countries, receive a generous start-up financing appointment largely to research, and for the purpose of strengthen-
for a period of five years, for developing a research group in Flanders. ing the structural framework for young researchers, 1.500 million
The size of the amount will vary according to the discipline, and such EUR will be appropriated in 2007 for financing additional BOF-ZAP
funds can be used for operational, personnel and equipment costs. In mandates (BA 40.03). In addition, at least the same amount will
2007, 12.171 million EUR have been appropriated for this programme be allocated annually in 2008 and 2009, so that, depending on the
(BA 41.05). The basic principles of this programme were already ap- appointments that are made in the universities, between 45 and 60
proved by the Flemish government in July 2005. additional BOF-ZAP mandates can be financed with these additional
funds. To make this possible, a number of changes have been carried
out in the BOF resolution.
Table 7: Programme 71.3 Scientific research with an economic focus (funds in million EUR)
Table 8: Programs 71.4 Strategic and policy-oriented research (funds in million EUR)
Furthermore, a structural increase of 0.4 million EUR provides addi- Figure 3 below shows the evolution of the total funds, including the
tional funds for the TETRA Fund (BA 44.06). With that, this budget one-off special funds outside out the classic budget programme,
reaches 7.399 million EUR. which were introduced as of 2004, and which were intended for the
realisation of specific policy priorities of the corresponding year. Two
The subsidy for Project-based Scientific Research (PWO) was additional funds (for R&D) will also be available in 2007: 30 million
increased in 2005 from 3.0 million EUR to 7.5 million EUR and EUR for the Hermes Fund and 2.6 million EUR for LRM impulse
increase further in 2006 to 9.0 million EUR. This is also the budget financing, which is for the expansion of research activities at the
for 2007. transnational University Limburg (tUL). This additional net increase
of approx. 60 million EUR in R&D Funds, which will be allocated
The grant to IWT, for specialisation grants, is increasing from 21.729 to the EWI policy domain in 2007, partially massed in figure 3 by
million EUR in 2006 to 24.255 million EUR in 2007. the fact that the amount of 75 million EUR supplementary funds,
which had been allocated to the Flemish Innovation Fund (VINNOF)
For increasing at the research capacity at universities (BA 40.01), outside of the classical budget programmes in 2005 in 2006, will not
additional funds are being made available from the policy domain be repeated in 2007. This increase becomes clearly visible in figure 2,
Education and Training as well as from the policy domains Economy where the evolution is shown without the special one-off funds.
and Science and Innovation. In consultation with the Minister of
Education, it was decided to make extra funds available from the
R&D budget, as an additional stimulation designed to strengthen
the research component of education for the academic content of
graduate courses. In 2006, 2 million EUR was appropriated for this
(BA 44.06 from programme 71.2). In 2007, 5 million EUR has been
appropriated for this purpose.
Figure 2: Evolution of OA 71, without special funds (million EUR) Figure 3: Evolution of OA 71, incl. special funds (million EUR)
800 800
750 750
700 700
650 650
800 800
600 750 600 750
700 700
550 550
650 650
500 600 500 600
550 550
450 450
500 500
400 450 400 450
400 400
350 350
350 350
300 300 300 300
2000 2001 2002 2003 2000
2004
2001 2005 2006
2002 2003 2004 2007i
2005 2006 2007i 2000 2001 2002 20032000
2004
2001 2005 2006
2002 2003 2004 2007i
2005 2006 2007i
Totaal WB 71 (+ BOF)
Total R&D 71 (+ BOF) Totaal WB 71 (+ BOF)
Total R&D 71 (+ BOF)
Table 9: Funds for the ‘actual science policy’, namely for the science and technology innovation policy in the programmes 71 and 33,
supplemented with several specific funds of the initial and the revised budget 2006, and the initial budget 2007 (funds in million EUR).
&D
R 2006 2006 2007 Increase vs. Increase vs.
initial final initial 2006 initial 2006 final
71.1 2.965 5.269 5.057 2.092 -0.212
71.2 (+BOF) 227.908 240.165 256.069 28.161 15.904
71.3 145.928 139.038 160.080 14.152 21.042
71.4 231.888 235.290 258.687 26.799 23.397
Hermes fund – Innovation 30.000 30.000 30.000 0.000 0.000
Provisional budget - National Lottery 11.712 0.000 2.330 -9.382 2.330
Impulse financing for tUL 2.600 2.600 2.600 0.000 0.000
P.M.V. – VITO 2.700 2.700 0.000 -2.700 -2.700
VINNOF 75.000 75.000 0.000 -75.000 -75.000
33.1 6.794 6.806 6.929 0.135 0.123
33.2 (-BOF) 162.972 163.293 168.242 5.270 4.949
33.3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
35.1 Subsidy social prov. 3.723 4.039 3.782 0.059 -0.257
TOTAL 904.190 904.200 893.776 -10.414 -10.424
Figure 4: Distribution of science and innovation policy funds in 2007, over the 13 policy domains
LV
1.4%
OV LNE
2.5%
52.0%
WSE
0.02%
other
6.8%
CJSM
1.0%
EWI
41.2%
WVG MOW
0.5% 0.2%
IV RWO
FB BZ 0.4%
0.1%
0.4% 0.1%
DAR
0.1%
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
R&D
O&O STET
O&V STS
W&T
1.57%
In figure 6, the entire 2007 budget for science policy is distributed
according to the NABS classification. These NABS codes indicate the
application domain of the research that has been carried out, and
they are applied exclusively to R&D funds. NABS stands for “nomen-
clatures for the analysis and comparison of scientific programmes 1.65%
0.17%
and budgets”. Due to the fast evolution in some research domains,
0.87%
the NABS codes are due for a revision. The new NABS codes will 1.87%
probably be applied as of 2008. The most important advantage of a 1.05%
0.03%
structure according to the NABS classification is that it makes inter- 2.47%
41.43%
national comparisons possible.
Table 10: Distribution of the total HBPWB budget (in million EUR)
Year Non-oriented Operational Other Other Industrial Govt. institutes, Sectoral Global Total
research university university institutes research departments, initiatives- science
subsidies subsidies services and policy- supporting policy
VOIs research
1993 76.866 401.472 75.700 9.649 120.873 15.113 18.927 6.780 725.380
1994 81.487 418.670 119.152 10.015 133.743 19.246 27.092 11.140 820.545
1995 89.248 434.771 99.891 10.105 121.855 19.217 25.419 7.350 807.855
1996 106.930 449.777 91.218 10.378 146.549 40.183 28.333 17.921 891.288
1997 124.926 464.636 73.848 9.165 178.442 39.890 29.850 22.099 942.855
1998 137.439 479.022 64.903 9.237 207.867 40.380 41.704 32.704 1,013.256
1999 155.727 489.009 83.944 11.902 219.446 45.813 39.338 61.800 1,106.979
2000 171.906 500.975 88.260 11.225 216.199 54.372 43.771 40.348 1,127.056
2001 180.526 512.265 88.058 12.455 227.163 52.917 68.867 23.417 1,165.667
2002 190.964 539.532 88.506 13.822 292.746 48.983 67.338 26.911 1,268.801
2003 195.554 561.284 89.112 14.382 330.105 71.795 50.500 22.465 1,335.196
2004 218.288 577.947 83.855 14.362 378.606 65.300 31.201 23.314 1,392.873
2005 233.359 594.462 85.543 14.724 433.491 69.029 33.857 24.365 1,488.829
2006 256.512 615.125 87.926 14.968 464.754 70.457 36.200 26.325 1,572.267
2007 278.597 633.213 62.431 16.564 426.919 70.000 39.116 28.931 1,555.772
The global expenditure items are reported for each of these six
Figure 7: Distribution of funds for the science policy (HBPWB) 2007
subdivisions below. The time series that are a consequence will be
discussed in detail in the Flemish Indicators Book 2007. Detailed
information about the funds can also be found on the website
www.ewi-vlaanderen.be/speurgids. The table below shows the
2.5% 1.9%
4.5% distribution of the entire 2007 budget for the science policy in
these six subdivisions.
17.9%
27.4%
n 1. Non-oriented research
n 2.1 Operational university subsidies
n 2.2 Other subsidies for universities
40.7% n 2.3 Other institutes
1.1%
n 3. Industrial research
4.0%
n 4. Governmental institutes, departments, services and VOIs
n 5. Sectoral initiatives - policy-supporting research
n 6. Global science policy
51% of the funds for non-oriented research are distributed via FWO
Figure 8: Non-oriented research for 2007 at the universities
Flanders, 40% via BOF and the remaining 9% via IWT Flanders.
IWT
9%
BOF
40%
FWO
51%
Table 12: Operational subsidies to universities, other subsidies to universities and other institutes for 2007
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
KUBrussel
0.9%
VUB
12.8%
KULeuven
UA 36.4%
14.1%
UHasselt
2.7%
tUL
UGent 1.2%
31.9%
Table 14: Scientific institutes, departmental services and Flemish Public Institutes (VOIs) in 2007
LNE
28.4% WVG
14.0%
CJSM
10.9%
LV WSE
14.4% 0.9%
Part 3
A precondition for a good scientific and technological innovation po-
licy is the availability sufficient funds for research and development
(R&D). One of the most frequently used indicators for presenting
R&D funds is the R&D intensity: This is the percentage of the gross
domestic regional product (GDRP), which is appropriated for R&D.
This indicator removes the influence of the size of a region, and it
is therefore also excellently suited for international comparisons.
The financial resources that are included in this indicator consist of
all R&D expenditures by Flemish companies (BERD: Expenditure on
R&D in the Business Enterprise Sector), those of Public Research
Centres, expenditures by the government, the universities and the
higher education institutes, as well as non-profit organisations.
This total is abbreviated as GERD: Gross Domestic Expenditure on
Research and Development.
Flanders
The R&D intensity is calculated on the basis of the results, which are This calculation is built up as follows:
provided by a biannual OECD R&D survey. Such data has recently 1. The efforts of the Flemish government by itself;
been calculated for the survey of 2006 (period 2004-2005), and 2. The efforts of Flanders + the Flemish share in federal government
these will be published in the Flemish Indicators Book 2007. funds;
3. The efforts of the Flemish government + the Flemish share in the
There are of course no survey data available for 2006 and 2007, and federal government funds + the Flemish share in the funds of the
there are also no alternative information sources. The same approximate EU research programmes (Framework Programmes).
calculation will therefore be used here, which has already previously been
published in the Science, Technology and Innovation Information Guides.
Table 16: Evolution of R&D funds, and R&D funds as a percentage of GDRP of the Flemish government
R&D credits (million EUR) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Flemish government (1) 625.071 711.258 770.687 820.666 898.638 966.137 953.584
Flemish share of Federal Govt. funds (2) 240.052 235.515 252.597 248.878 233.595 252.887 235.223
Flemish share of Federal Govt. funds (3) 272.383 268.151 279.271 282.974 259.004 287.058 272.569
Total V + Fed (2) 865.123 946.773 1,023.284 1,069.544 1,132.233 1,219.024 1,188.807
Total V + Fed (3) 897.454 979.409 1,049.958 1,103.640 1,157.642 1,253.195 1,226.153
Flemish share of EU funds (4) 70.723 70.723 70.723 70.723 70.723 70.723 70.723
Vl + Fed (2) + EU 935.845 1,017.495 1,094.006 1,140.266 1,202.955 1,289.747 1,259.529
Vl + Fed (3) + EU 968.177 1,050.131 1,120.680 1,174.362 1,228.364 1,323.918 1,296.875
GDRP (5) in million EUR 147,999.4 152,714.9 157,115.1 164,948.3 170,768.7 180,284.9 188,487.9
Flemish government (1) 0.42 0.47 0.49 0.50 0.53 0.54 0.51
V1 + Federal Government funds (2) 0.58 0.62 0.65 0.65 0.66 0.68 0.63
V1 + Federal Government funds (3) 0.61 0.64 0.67 0.67 0.68 0.70 0.65
Vl + Fed (2) + EU 0.63 0.67 0.70 0.69 0.70 0.72 0.67
Vl + Fed (3) + EU 0.65 0.69 0.71 0.71 0.72 0.73 0.69
BERD (6) 1.84 1.61 1.51 1.42 1.46 1.46 1.46
Total Vl + BERD 2.26 2.08 2.00 1.92 1.99 2.00 1.97
Total govt. (2) + BERD 2.47 2.28 2.21 2.11 2.16 2.18 2.13
Total govt. (3) + BERD 2.49 2.30 2.22 2.13 2.18 2.19 2.15
(1)
Flemish government, as defined in the HBPWB - adapted budgets 2001-2006; initial (4)
Estimated according to the calculated return of 2.2%, for the 5th Framework Programme
budget 2007 (1998-2002). The same return was applied to the following years. Source: Flanders in the Eu-
(2)
Flemish share in the Federal Government R&D funds: ESA distribution keen at 35.5% ropean 5th Framework Programme for research, P. Dengis, E. Dewallef and K. Verlaeckt, 2005
Flemish (Source: VRWB - Flemish Indicators Book 2005) and the rest of Federal Govern- (5)
Source: Studiedienst Vlaamse Regering (SVR) - Flemish government (version of the calcula-
ment funds at 56% Flemish. Federal Government R&D funds: Source: Consultation group tions dated 25 January 2007), on the basis of various sources: 2001-2004: INR; 2005-2007:
CFS/STAT, amendments of the Federal science policy. For 2006: Initial funds; for 2007: Estimates by SVR
Provisional figures (6)
Source: 3% memorandum, R&D Indicators Support Centre, 14 March 2007. The % BERD
(3)
Flemish share in the Federal R&D funds, according to the distribution key 56% V 2005 was used for 2006 and 2007
Figure 12: Evolution of the R&D-%/GDP-Flanders, only taking into account the funds
of the Flemish government
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Figure 13: Evolution of the R&D-%/GDP-Flanders, Flemish government funds + share in the
Federal R&D funds, according to the distribution key 56% V + Flemish return on EU-FP + BERD
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.1
2.0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
International comparison of
government efforts for R&D
(GBAORD)
The government efforts are expressed in GBAORD (Government
Budget Appropriations or Outlays for R&D), which are the funds
by the governments that are available for R&D. The GBAORD is an
indicator, which is applied by OECD and EUROSTAT, which gives
an idea of the input by governments for R&D. Table 17 presents
a comparison of the international GBAORD as a % of GDP (own
calculation).
Table 17: International comparison of the R&D government expenditures (GBAORD), expressed as a percentage of GDP (GDRP)
1996 1998 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Flanders* 0.37 0.41 0.42 0.42 0.47 0.49 0.50 0.53 0.54 0.51
Flanders** 0.60 0.64 0.64 0.63 0.67 0.70 0.69 0.70 0.72 0.67
Flanders*** 0.64 0.66 0.66 0.65 0.69 0.71 0.71 0.72 0.73 0.69
Belgium 0.54 0.56 0.57 0.59 0.60 0.61 0.59 0.60 0.62
Germany 0.88 0.81 0.79 0.78 0.78 0.79 0.77 0.77 no data
France 1.07 0.96 0.96 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.96 0.93 no data
United Kingdom 0.75 0.66 0.69 0.68 0.77 0.76 0.71 0.72 no data
Ireland 0.32 0.27 0.30 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.42 0.42 no data
Netherlands 0.81 0.79 0.77 0.75 0.74 0.74 0.73 0.71 no data
Denmark 0.71 0.74 0.76 0.75 0.73 0.73 0.71 0.71 0.71
Finland 0.95 1.07 0.98 0.97 0.96 1.00 1.01 1.03 1.03
Sweden 1.07 0.77 0.71 0.84 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.89 0.88
Italy 0.57 0.56 0.64 0.68 no data no data no data 0.73 0.59
Portugal 0.48 0.51 0.58 0.60 0.67 0.62 0.64 0.73 0.75
Spain 0.47 0.55 0.60 0.66 0.74 0.73 0.80 0.85 no data
United States 0.89 0.85 0.86 0.91 0.99 1.05 1.08 1.07 1.00
Japan 0.56 0.60 0.66 0.70 0.72 0.73 0.73 0.71 no data
1,1
1,0
0,9
0,8
0,7
0,6
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
1996 1998 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
n Flanders n Finland
n Belgium n Sweden
n Germany n Italy
n France n Portugal
n United Kingdom n Spain
n Ireland n United States
n Netherlands n Japan
n Denmark
concluding remarks 45
Used abbreviations
46
SME Small and Medium-sized Enterprise VIZO Vlaams Instituut voor het Zelfstandig Ondernemen
SP Science policy (Flemish Institute for Independent Entrepreneurs)
STET Scientific and Technical Education and Training VLAM Vlaams Centrum voor Agro- en Visserijmarketing vzw
STS Scientific and technological services (Flanders Agricultural Marketing Board)
TPP Technological Product and Process VLAO Vlaams Agentschap Ondernemen (Flanders Enterprise)
tUL Transnationale Universiteit Limburg VLAREM Vlaams reglement betreffende de milieuvergunning
(transnational University of Limburg) (Flemish Regulations related to Environmental Licensing)
TWOL Toegepast Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Leefmilieu VLM Vlaamse Landmaatschappij
(Applied Scientific Research into the Environment) (Public Land Agency of Flanders)
UA Universiteit Antwerpen (University of Antwerp) VMM Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij
UGent Universiteit Gent (University of Ghent) (Public Environmental Agency of Flanders)
UHasselt Universiteit Hasselt (University of Hasselt) VOI Vlaamse Openbare Instelling
UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural (Flemish Public Institution)
Organization VPM Vlaamse Participatiemaatschappij
UNU United Nations University (Flemish Participation Company)
VESOC Vlaams Economisch Sociaal Overlegcomité VRT Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroep
(Economic and Social Consultation Committee (Flemish Community Broadcasting Company)
of Flanders) VRWB Vlaamse Raad voor Wetenschapsbeleid
VIB Vlaams Interuniversitair Instituut voor Biotechnologie (Flemish Council for Science Policy)
(Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology) VUB Vrije Universiteit Brussel (Free University of Brussels)
VIN Vlaams Innovatie Netwerk WSE Werk en Sociale Economie (Work and Social Economy)
(Flemish Innovation Network) WVG Welzijn, Volksgezondheid en Gezin
VINNOF Vlaams Innovatiefonds (Flemish Innovation Fund) (Welfare, Public Health and Family)
VIOE Vlaams Instituut voor het Onroerend Erfgoed ZAP Zelfstandig Academisch Personeel
(Flemish Heritage Institute) (Independent Academic Personnel)
VITO Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek
(Flemish Institute for Technological Research)
viWTA Vlaams instituut voor Wetenschappelijk en
Technologisch Aspectenonderzoek (Flemish Institute
for Scientific and Technological Assessment)
Contributors
IWT Flanders: Paul Zeeuwts; FWO Flanders: Benno Hinnekint; IBBT: Karen Boers; IMEC: Koen Snoeckx; VIB: Lieve Ongena; VITO: Dirk Fransaer;
PMV: Bart De Smet; VPM: Herman Daems; LRM: Lieve Ketelslegers; INBO: Jos Van Slycken, Beatrijs Van der Aa; AQUAFIN: Eev Breugelmans, Chris
Thoeye; OVAM: Luc Vanacker; VLM: Roland De Paepe, Sofie Ducheyne; VMM: Ann De Meester; Vlaams Agentschap voor Personen met een
Handicap: Rudi Kennes; KMDA: Zjef Pereboom; Kind en Gezin: Bea Buysse; STV: Paul Berckmans; ILVO: André Roelandts, Erik Van Bockstaele,
Dirk Van Lierde; KANTL: Marijke De Wit; KMSKA: Marjolijn Barbier; Toerisme Vlaanderen: Jan Van Praet; VLAM: Jean De Lescluze, Luc Van
Bellegem; viWTA: Robby Berloznik; Agentschap Economie: Tim Ampe; DAR: Tine Mortelmans, Frank Steenput, Sabine Van de Gaer, Heidi Vander
Poorten; BZ: Annemie Degroote, Jeroen Dejonckheere, Fatima Tigra; FB: Bart Dewandeleer, Stefan Lagast, Tom Van Laere; IV: Koen Jongbloet, Jos
Van Cleynenbreugel; OV: Lieven Blomme, Noël Vercruysse, Geertrui De Ruytter, Micheline Scheys; WVG: Kurt Cooreman, Anne Van Walleghem,
Ria Vandenreyt, Jos Versaen, Dirk Wildemeersch; Herwig Deumens; CJSM: Martin Decuyper, Patrick Ghelen, Sofie Taghon, Tony Verstraete; WSE:
Johan Troch, Ann Van den Cruyce; LV: Nicole De Boeck, Inge Piessens, Dirk Van Gijseghem; LNE: Philippe Van Haver; Marnix De Vrieze, Martien
Swerts, Katrijn Van Damme, Lieve Vandecasteele, Elke Vanwildemeersch, Jan Vereecke; MOW: Wilfried Goossens, Frank Mostaert, Lieve Van de
Water; RWO: Sofie Houvenaghel, René Van der Lecq, Ronald Van Paassen.
47
Colophon
D/2007/3241/107
48
Flemish government
Department of Economy,
Science and Innovation
Koning Albert II-laan 35 bus 10
1030 Brussels
info@ewi.vlaanderen.be
www.ewi-vlaanderen.be