Conclusions:

Two-dimensional flow of Eyring-powell for heat and mass transfer is probed. A

horizontal channel of uniform configuration is chosen to analyze the nanofluid. The
effects of suction have also been considered. The upper wall of the channel is moving
with constant velocity in the axial direction and this results in movement of the nanofluid.
The Perturbation method is employed to find out the series solution of highly nonlinear
and coupled differential equations. A collation is made between exact and numerical
solution and found both is excellent consensus. Role of emerging parameters is examined
through graphs and tables. Some salient features of the investigation are enlisted as:
 Two nanofluid flows are investigated, i.e., Plan Couette nanofluid flow and Generalized
Couette nanofluid flow.
 Nano flow of Generalized Couette case is better than Plan Couette case.
 Sequel of constant pressure gradient on nanoflow is more eminent at some distance away
from the lower wall.
 More the suction faster the nanofluid flow while couple stresses hamper the motion.
 Extra heat appended to the system due to Viscous dissipation into the system, but this
heat wiped out because of third Eyring-Powell parameter.
 Nanoparticle concentration declines for thermophoretic force whereas, Brownian motion
acts oppositely.

Comparison with the Previous Study:

Numerical data acquired by using Range-Kutta method with shooting technique is juxtaposed
with the one procured by Gupta and Massoudi [10], for the case of uniform viscosity model in
Table 1. Gupta and Massoudi [9] talked through the generalized second-grade fluid between two
heated walls for the case of Newtonian and non-Newtonian (m ≠0) fluid under the consideration
of constant and variable viscosity models. For comparison purpose, we have presented the values
of velocity and temperature gradients against the variation of pressure gradient and viscous
dissipation parameters for limiting case ( m3=m=0 )in Table 1 and noted that the obtained
solutions are in full coherence with the solutions obtained by Gupta and Massoudi [10].
However, the numerical values of Nusselt number against different parameters are tabulated in
Table 2. It is noted that the more heat transfer rate is significant for the case of plane Couette
nanoflow. On the other hand, the transfer is nano species more prominent for the case of
Generalized Couette flow.