Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
W
hen there is a crisis – like the need to cut costs, after the people who make big money. But neither position
keep customers, or outsmart competitors – many nor salary seem to have much to do with finding meaning
leaders move quickly to tackle the problem, then in work.
move to the next crisis. Now, as the economy slowly Our research confirms what people experience; even
begins to recover, leaders need to shift from attacking in horrible work settings that are degrading and possibly
short-term problems to developing long-term dangerous, some people thrive. This doesn’t mean they
opportunities. Emerging from the economic recession are happy about their circumstances, but suggests that
will require us to overcome a sort of psychological they manage to find meaning despite them. “Finding
recession. Many employees and leaders are fatigued and meaning” is probably a misnomer, however. Meaning is
want more out of work than endless responses to crises. not a dropped coin that we pick up by chance. It is more
The extent to which leaders deal with this need will define like a good piece of art that we make. People have to create
their future successes. the meaning of their work and their lives; that process
As organisations emerge from the recession, leaders requires skill and practice, not just luck.
need to become “meaning makers”, and help employees Leaders cannot afford to leave the creation of meaning
replace deficit with abundant thinking. Abundance is to chance. People who discover meaning at work also tend
found not in circumstances or events, but in the value we to work harder, more creatively, and with more tenacity,
place on those events and the way we interpret their giving the companies that employ them a boost in the
impact on us. Meaning is not inherent in events; it is made marketplace. When people make sense of their jobs they
by people. There is good news and not-so-good news. also make cents for their companies. Leaders can’t ignore
Good news: the meaning of our lives is not controlled by this bottom line. Data to support this assertion is often
what happens; we can find purpose, value, and also indirect, but consider a few interesting scenarios:
happiness in a wide variety of even unpleasant
DR WENDY ULRICH circumstances. Not-so-good news: we have to work at this •Over a 10-year period (1998 to 2008) “best
is a practising meaning-making process. We have to determine what companies to work for” have a 6.8 % stock
psychologist. She has work means, at either a corporate or a personal level.
written books on appreciation vs. 1.0% for the average firm.
personal change,
Leaders have the primary responsibility for this meaning- •61 hospitals in the UK had a 7% decline in death rate
provided training in making process. of patients when they invested in the well-being of
HR and personal At a personal level, inner dialogues shape this meaning. their staff.
change and meaning, If I tell myself I’m not paid well because I’m not respected
and taught at
•Only 13% of disengaged employees would
for my skills, I build a different meaning than if I tell recommend their company’s products or services,
Brigham Young
University.
myself how glad I am to work for an organisation that is compared with 78% of engaged employees.
financially responsible. If I tell myself my boss’s criticism •The probability of an Initial Public Offering
means he is trying to help me improve because he values succeeding goes from 60 to 79% when the new
my contribution and wants me to succeed, I build different company invests in its people.
meaning than if I tell myself his criticism is a forerunner •Disengaged employees are 10 times more likely to
to my getting sacked for incompetence. If I see my say they will leave their company within a year.
company as a major contributor to solving the energy
crisis, I have a different feeling about the value of my Such examples support the conclusion that when
labour than if I am just crunching numbers for someone companies invest in the well-being of employees, they
else’s selfish agenda. At a corporate level, leaders can help invest in their own bottom line. But what connects money
shape the meaning that employees assign to corporate spent on people and money earned? Should companies
DR DAVE ULRICH is
a professor at the realities, focusing corporate consciousness on invest in better healthcare packages? Childcare facilities?
Ross School of opportunities instead of problems. Cruises for high performers? Parks for pets at work?
Business, University In our research to unravel the meaning of meaning, we Any of these things might be valued by one employee
of Michigan. He has synthesise and report theory and results. We also like to or another, but we believe leaders can make more
won numerous
ask random people in airports and lifts what they like informed decisions about how to motivate and engage
international awards
for his ideas, about their job. Answers vary from “the challenge” to “the their employees by considering the question of meaning.
teaching, and people” to “having free time to read” to “Are you kidding? Even in unfavourable circumstances, people can
research. I hate my job.” Some of the people giving these answers experience an activity as meaningful when it reflects their
make a lot of money in big companies; others sweep up own values, connects them with people they like, raises