Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
When a reader or viewer enters William Shakespeare’s world of King Lear, there are
many pressing issues that arise. There are matters of love, family, deception, and superstition,
and they all come together in perhaps one of the play’s most underrated characters in terms of
complexity: Edgar. He is cast out from his family and must assume the role of a beggar to assure
survival. However, Edgar’s assumption of various roles comes first out of necessity, but later
serves to comfort others around him from the hazardous truth. He uses each of his distinct
impersonations to achieve some noble goal to aid others, but ultimately succeeds in empowering
At first Edgar’s character of Poor Tom is a resort to safety and an attempt to distance
himself from his family. Edgar is thrown out of Gloucester’s castle early on in Act 2, Scene 1
after Edmund brutally manipulates him. These early conversations with Edmund are the first that
the reader sees of Edgar. He comes across as passive and questioning; the first three times he
speaks in the entire play are questions (1.2.145-158). After a little dialogue with Edmund he
realizes that “some villain hath done [him] wrong” (1.2.172). It takes Edgar a while to realize
that he has been set-up. He initially is not very perceptive, all he can do is listen to every word of
his brother and realize he has been wronged. The reader here must question Edgar’s naiveté; his
prior relations with Edmund must have indicated some sort of cunning. However, Edgar is
gullible enough to eat up Edmund’s every word. When Edmund asks if he has said anything
controversial, he replies, “I am sure on ‘t, not a word” (2.1.27). Although he is certain here that
evident to the reader, but for some reason Edgar is blind to it. Edgar’s first change comes in Act
Jeremy Keeshin
2, Scene 3 when he gets a little edgy. In his banishment from the castle he was so accepting of
his fate, but now that he is out in the wild, he gets a little motivated to change. He says, “I will
preserve myself, and am bethought/ To take the basest and most poorest shape” (2.3.6-7). Edgar
finally resolves here to look out for himself. He takes the shape of “Poor Tom” (2.3.20), but
interestingly enough this is not the first time this character is brought up. Edmund names “Tom
o’ Bedlam” (1.2.143) right before the first time Edgar enters. This seems to be an interesting
foreshadowing of Edgar’s future character. Why Poor Tom? At this point in time when Edgar
agrees to disguise himself, he has the option to be any being he chooses. It is probable that the
reason he chooses Poor Tom, this filthy and possessed beggar, is because he wants to get as far
away from what he was before this, a son of a noble. Being Poor Tom is safe; how can Poor Tom
Edgar’s character of Poor Tom and his other disguises provide himself and those around
him a sense of comfort in not having to deal directly with truth. Poor Tom is comforting to Edgar
because he does not need to be himself. When he is Poor Tom he is an actor, and as he hones the
role he becomes more and more believable. Poor Tom does not have the worries that Edgar had:
worries of nobility, relationships, status. Edgar reveals the ease of living in disguise in his
soliloquy:
He tells his reader that when one is the worst, anything that happens is an improvement. This is
later the sentiment echoed to Gloucester and as an aside when he thinks he has reached the
lowest of human existence. He has realized so far from his act as Poor Tom, that when one has
nothing, there is nothing to worry about. Edgar becomes the lunatic and carefree Poor Tom just
by assuming his character. This lends insight to Edgar’s disguise: Now that he is Poor Tom who
is the worst, he has nothing to fear, and this lends him a sense of empowerment. This comfort
that he gives himself is also put the way of Gloucester. Edgar sees the blinded Gloucester and is
terrified: “And worst I may be yet. The worst is not / So long as we can say “This is the worst””
(4.1.30-31). Shakespeare plays with this idea of the best and the worst through Edgar who deals
in both extremes. Edgar, even in this dire time, preserves hope. Edgar’s character has been able
to adapt and persevere through disguise. He comes to a crossroads on whether or not to help
Gloucester. “I cannot daub it further,” he tells the audience (4.1.60). This is important, because
now even as Poor Tom, he regains some of his identity as Edgar, son of Gloucester. It is in this
way that the sifting through other characters helps him to find himself. He wants to help
Gloucester; he wants to act the role of son now, but still opts not to. He says, “And yet I must”
(4.1.62). He opts here to comfort Gloucester as Poor Tom, because maybe Gloucester is not
ready to deal with the true Edgar. This is evident later when Gloucester dies shortly after Edgar
reveals his true nature. He tells Albany, “His flawed heart… ‘Twixt two extremes of passion, joy
and grief, / Burst smilingly” (5.3.232-235). Poor Tom is about soothing, reassuring, and
consoling. Edgar’s Poor Tom is the white lie personified. The white lie is told to benefit both the
liar and receiver by euphemizing the message. Poor Tom to Gloucester is a lie, but one that
Jeremy Keeshin
Edgar thinks will ultimately benefit them both. Edgar says in an aside, “Why I do trifle thus with
his despair / Is done to cure it” (4.6.42-43). This means that this excessive work that is being
done to deceive Gloucester has underlying good intentions. Poor Tom and his lies are all for
Gloucester’s benefit. Revealing his true persona would most likely shock Gloucester. Edgar lies
about the hill, and the verge, and the cliff, but all to save Gloucester from suicide. It would be a
cruel joke if it was known what measures Edgar was going to deceive and save Gloucester.
However, it is the fact that these measures are unknown; this is an instance where Edgar’s ends
justify the means. Gloucester is perceptive of a change in his aide: “Methinks thy voice is
altered” (4.6.10). This is important because this is the first time that Edgar falters on his disguise,
he is usually so eager to play the role, but now his grieving father is causing him to waver. When
Gloucester is about to die, Edgar says, “Give me your hand” (4.6.31). This is most clearly a sign
of comfort in its literal and metaphorical interpretation. He is trying to lend him a hand and also
Edgar uses his alter egos as couriers to deliver messages or information that cannot be
given directly, or if it can, is most effective given sideways. This is the case when Edgar
transforms himself into a peasant after he has tricked Gloucester. Each of Edgar’s characters has
some purpose to achieve. Poor Tom’s purpose was comfort; the peasant’s purpose is
rejuvenation. This is evident right away when he says to Gloucester, “Thy life’s a miracle”
(4.6.69) and “Think that the clearest gods, who make them honors / Of men’s impossibilities,
have preserved thee” (4.6.90-92). Edgar caters to Gloucester’s solace in superstition to renew
strength in his father. Whether or not he believes the things he says is inconsequential (most
likely he does not believe them, he makes outrageous claims as Poor Tom), what matters is that
when he speaks to each character while in disguise, each sentence tries to elicit a desired
Jeremy Keeshin
outcome. Later in this scene, Edgar becomes a countryman before he fights Oswald and defends
Gloucester. His new dialect, “An ‘chud ha’ bin zwaggered,” (4.6.267) is completely different
than Poor Tom and the peasant. This may have the result of Gloucester thinking that three
different people have been caring for him, when in reality it was only one. This ploy by Edgar is
cunning to instill hope in Gloucester. This signals a major change from his passivity in Act 1.
Edgar’s characters deliver one more message in a sideways manner. As a peasant, Edgar
approaches Albany and gives him a letter with vague instructions. Why so unclear and indirect?
Time and again, Edgar does not approach the matter head on. He deceives all of those around
him, but ultimately to their benefit. It is in this great irony that Edgar works: He tricks to help.
transformation in his true self and increased perceptiveness. Ultimately, Edgar’s testing of
alternate identities of peasant, beggar, and countryman lead him to find his noble self. In the
The effect of this speech by Edgar is stark in contrast to his dialogue with Edmund at the start of
the play. First he was passive and naïve, now he is active and accusatory. This change was
caused by his movement through alternate identities. By testing out others’ selves he found
himself. This invigorated Edgar now shows immense acuity. He says, “This would have seemed
a period / To such as love not sorrow; but another” (5.3.242-243) and “Speak what we feel, not
what we ought to say” (5.3.393). Edgar demonstrates a magnificent change in these lines. He
shows he has gotten in touch with his emotions and is capable now of expressing them.
Edgar’s character is one of much complexity, as it entails five distinct personas. He was
Edgar the passive noble, Poor Tom the beggar, the peasant, the countryman, and Edgar the
renewed noble. His goal in his disguise was to shy away from truth, but in the end, it led him to
it. His other characters became the means by which he was able to interact with a society that he
was wrongfully cast out of. His assumption of characters was very opportunistic; he could have
easily sat on the side and been of no effect in this play, but his role was very important. His
mechanisms of deception were very discreet, but allowed him an open avenue into change.
Edgar’s change from reflexive to proactive is epitomized by Edmunds line in the crucial moment
of the play: “The wheel is come full circle” (5.3.208). Edgar’s dramatic effect on the play was
due to his ability to tap into the minds of each character, and this ultimately helped him
rediscover himself.
Jeremy Keeshin
Thoughts
At first Edgar’s character of Poor Tom is a resort to safety and an attempt to distance himself
Edgar’s character of Poor Tom and his other disguises provide himself and those around him a
Edgar uses his alter egos as couriers to deliver messages or information that cannot be given
confusion
safety
function
safety
messeger
empowerment
Jeremy Keeshin
poor tom
peasant
countryman
5.1
when edgar is formally blocked from speaking with gloucester it is useless for him to give info
as "edgar"
like at the end lear is hesitant to believe that kent is who he says he is, because when we have set
passive initially
goes through a transformation of his real self by moving through alternate selves ****
why a begger ... he is noble so now feels he needs to test the other side
39 "SOme villain hath done me wrong" -- suspicious, but unsure, too unsure to take action
"Armed? " question mark, unsurenes, but edmund has the upper hand.. why
75 Edgar is "sure" now that he has done nothing wrong, why is he so submissive to Edgar
we (the reader or viewer) realize edmund's trickery here, why does Edgar not realize it
how does it naturally follow that if one is noble he should disguise as a beggar.
why, it does naturally follow because he is trying to make himself the opposite of what he
thinks he is
ironiclaly he calls himself poor tom here as he was called by Edmund on his first appearance on
37
"Edgar I nohting am" as Edgar I am nothing. why does he think that. it must be brainwashing
139 here he enters as Poor Tom for the first time.. "the foul fiend follows me"
clearly this shows how he is possesed, but i think it oculd show more.
could Edgar by now have already realized Edmunds trickery and think that Edmund is on his
case.
it is possible and could be a subtle message when he talks about this "Foul fiend" who the
reader
knows from the rest of the reading is a rather close description of edmund.
why does he pretend to be devil obsessed, i can see he wants to be a beggar but why this
157 big speech by Edgar him relating to lear, being kicked out by family
maybe he is Poor Tom the possessed because he doesn't know how to relate to people
solilouquy saying that, you know why it's the best to be the worst? because anything is an
Jeremy Keeshin
improvement. this here could be insight ot his disguise . now I have nothign to fear, like i did
before
next page he's all like "is this the worst" no, its not becaue as long as you can talk its not the
worst
175 "i cannot daub it further" these last pages he keeps wanting to tell. but he doesnt whyyy
195 the while lie of Poor Tom gives the white lie of the hill. why do we tell white lies? - for
comfort
Poor Tom can comfort gloucester now while Edgar cannot. Gloucester has not fully
gotten
over the fact that edmund has wronged him (maybe he has he realized in 3.7) but this
white
lie is easy and comfortable for both edgar and glucoester. it would be difficult to say who
he is
195 He comes off of his game, let's up a little on his disguise for the fist time noticeably. this is
important
he is usually so eager to be poor tom, but now his grieving and aid to his father is making
him
245 "know my name is lost" he has been so many differnt people by now
these other people help him find himself--- interestingly he fights and kills
Edmund before telling who he is... why. becuase its not who he is, what he dreses and says,
it is what he does.
249 5.3 the unmkasign scnece, edgar unmaks self and kent. tells a story about gloucester and
how he
unmaksetd to him...
unfortunalely too many too the latter, say what tehy think they should say