1) ANÁLISIS DEL SISTEMA DE MEDICIÓN

Gage R&R Study - ANOVA Method

Two-Way ANOVA Table With Interaction

Source DF SS MS F P
Part 9 52.8496 5.87218 1846274 0.000
Operator 1 0.0000 0.00002 5 0.054
Part * Operator 9 0.0000 0.00000 0 0.858
Repeatability 20 0.0001 0.00001
Total 39 52.8498

Alpha to remove interaction term = 0.25

Gage R&R
%Contribution
Source VarComp (of VarComp)
Total Gage R&R 0.00001 0.00
Repeatability 0.00001 0.00
Reproducibility 0.00000 0.00
Operator 0.00000 0.00
Part-To-Part 1.46804 100.00
Total Variation 1.46805 100.00

Study Var %Study Var
Source StdDev (SD) (5.15 * SD) (%SV)
Total Gage R&R 0.00243 0.01250 0.20
Repeatability 0.00232 0.01195 0.19
Reproducibility 0.00072 0.00369 0.06
Operator 0.00072 0.00369 0.06
Part-To-Part 1.21163 6.23989 100.00
Total Variation 1.21163 6.23990 100.00

Number of Distinct Categories = 703

Gage R&R (ANOVA) for Meas

Reported by :
G age name: Tolerance:
Date of study : M isc:

Components of Variation Meas by Part

100 % Contribution 6
% Study Var
Percent

50 4

2
0
Gage R&R Repeat Reprod Part-to-Part 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Part
R Chart by Operator
Meas by Operator
1 2
0.010 6
Sample Range

UCL=0.00670
0.005 4
_
R=0.00205
2
0.000 LCL=0
1 2
Operator
Xbar Chart by Operator
1 2 Operator * Part Interaction
6
6
Operator

La variación debida al método de medición

Sample Mean

1
Average

2
_
_
4 4
LCL=3.737
UCL=3.745
X=3.741 es de tan sólo 0.20%, por lo que el método
2 de medición es ACEPTADO
2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Part

2) ANÁLISIS DE ESTABILIDAD DEL PROCESO

Xbar-R Chart of DISP1
 Xbar-R Chart of DISP1
El proceso es estable pero tiene una
4.40 U C L=4.3972
5 clara tendencia hacia disparos más
cortos y además presenta dos
Sample Mean

4.35
_
_ causas especiales!!
X=4.3300

4.30

LC L=4.2628
1
4.25
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sample

U C L=0.1691
0.16
Sample Range

0.12

0.08 _
R=0.0657
0.04

0.00 LC L=0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sample

Test Results for Xbar Chart of DISP1

TEST 1. One point more than 3.00 standard deviations from center line.
Test Failed at points: 10

TEST 5. 2 out of 3 points more than 2 standard deviations from center line (on one side of CL).
Test Failed at points: 3, 10

* WARNING * If graph is updated with new data, the results above may no longer be correct.

3) ANÁLISIS DE LA CAPACIDAD DEL PROCESO

Probability Plot of DISP1

Probability Plot of DISP1

Normal
99
P-Value > 0.05, por lo que los datos
Mean 4.330 sí son normales y podemos analizar
StDev 0.04949
95 N 30
la capacidad.
AD 0.195
90
P-Value 0.883
80
70
Percent

60
50
40
30
20

10

1
4.20 4.25 4.30 4.35 4.40 4.45
DISP1

La especificación del Cliente para la distancia de disparo es de 2.90 ± 0.10

Process Capability of DISP1
 Process Capability of DISP1

LSL USL
P rocess D ata Within
LS L 2.8 Ov erall
Target *
USL 3 P otential (Within) C apability
S ample M ean 4.32997 Cp 0.86
C PL 13.15
S ample N 30
C P U -11.43
S tDev (Within) 0.0387949
S tDev (O v erall) 0.0494943 C pk -11.43
O v erall C apability
Pp 0.67
PPL 10.30
PPU -8.96
P pk -8.96
C pm *

2.925 3.150 3.375 3.600 3.825 4.050 4.275

O bserv ed P erformance E xp. Within P erformance E xp. O v erall P erformance
P P M < LS L 0.00 P P M < LS L 0.00 PPM < LS L 0.00
P P M > U S L 1000000.00 P P M > U S L 1000000.00 PPM > U S L 1000000.00
P P M Total 1000000.00 P P M Total 1000000.00 PPM Total 1000000.00

4) REALIZACIÓN DE DOE PARA ESTABLECER LOS NIVELES DE CADA FACTOR

PARA PODER DISPARAR A LA DISTANCIA ESPECIFICADA POR EL CLIENTE
La catapulta tiene 5 factores y los vamos a poner a dos niveles cada uno:

 A: posición de la cesta
 B: posición de la liga en el brazo móvil
 C: posición de la liga en el soporte fijo
 D: ángulo de disparo (-1 es 180º y +1 es 150º)
 E: posición del tope

Generamos un DOE de 2 niveles con 5 factores con una resolución V (16 corridas) y 3 réplicas:
StdOrder RunOrder CenterPt Blocks A-Cesta B-LigaB C-LigaS D-Angulo E-Tope DISP StDev
 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 6.394 0.00306
2 2 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 3.279 0.03900
3 3 1 1 -1 1 -1 -1 -1 2.886 0.05890
4 4 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 3.051 0.09840
5 5 1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 -1 1.702 0.02427
6 6 1 1 1 -1 1 -1 1 1.673 0.04262
7 7 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 1.342 0.01504
8 8 1 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 0.972 0.01582
9 9 1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 1.928 0.01102
10 10 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1.269 0.02380
11 11 1 1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1.489 0.00800
12 12 1 1 1 1 -1 1 -1 0.557 0.01286
13 13 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1 1.140 0.00643
14 14 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 0.518 0.00321
15 15 1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 0.283 0.00173
16 16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.436 0.02066
17 17 1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 6.400  
18 18 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 3.239  
19 19 1 1 -1 1 -1 -1 -1 2.884  
20 20 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 2.888  
21 21 1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 -1 1.689  
22 22 1 1 1 -1 1 -1 1 1.588  
23 23 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 1.367  
24 24 1 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 0.962  
25 25 1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 1.926  
26 26 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1.316  
27 27 1 1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1.481  
28 28 1 1 1 1 -1 1 -1 0.577  
29 29 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1 1.138  
30 30 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 0.512  
31 31 1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 0.286  
32 32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.461  
33 33 1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 6.396  
34 34 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 3.201  
35 35 1 1 -1 1 -1 -1 -1 2.783  
36 36 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 3.065  
37 37 1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 -1 1.736  
38 38 1 1 1 -1 1 -1 1 1.625  
39 39 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 1 1.340  
40 40 1 1 1 1 1 -1 -1 0.941  
41 41 1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 1.908  
42 42 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1.286  
43 43 1 1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1.497  
44 44 1 1 1 1 -1 1 -1 0.581  
45 45 1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1 1.150  
46 46 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1 0.513  
47 47 1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 0.286  
48 48 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.420  

Analizamos primero los factores que disminuyen la variabilidad: resulta que todos los factores influyen y los
valores ideales para disminuir la variabilidad según el response optimizer serían A +1, B +1, C +1, D +1, E-1.

Factorial Fit: StDev versus A-Cesta, B-LigaB, C-LigaS, D-Angulo, E-Tope

Estimated Effects and Coefficients for StDev (coded units)
Term Effect Coef
Constant 0.02405
A-Cesta 0.01599 0.00800
B-LigaB 0.00975 0.00488
C-LigaS -0.01565 -0.00783
D-Angulo -0.02617 -0.01309
E-Tope 0.00640 0.00320
A-Cesta*B-LigaB 0.00003 0.00001
A-Cesta*C-LigaS -0.00728 -0.00364
A-Cesta*D-Angulo -0.00765 -0.00383
A-Cesta*E-Tope 0.02225 0.01112
B-LigaB*C-LigaS -0.01557 -0.00778
B-LigaB*D-Angulo -0.01005 -0.00503
B-LigaB*E-Tope 0.00680 0.00340
C-LigaS*D-Angulo 0.00975 0.00487
C-LigaS*E-Tope 0.00353 0.00177
D-Angulo*E-Tope 0.00112 0.00056

S = * PRESS = *

Analysis of Variance for StDev (coded units)

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P
Main Effects 5 0.005288 0.005288 0.0010576 * *
2-Way Interactions 10 0.004419 0.004419 0.0004419 * *
Residual Error 0 * * *
Total 15 0.009707

Effects Pareto for StDev

Pareto Chart of the Effects
(response is StDev, Alpha = 0.10)
0.02946
D F actor N ame
A A -C esta
AE B B-LigaB
A C C -LigaS
C D D -A ngulo
BC E E -Tope

BD
B
Term

CD
AD
AC
BE
E
CE
DE
AB

0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.030

Effect
Lenth's PSE = 0.0146195

Quitamos AB:
Pareto Chart of the Standardized Effects
(response is StDev, Alpha = 0.10)
6
F actor N ame
D
A A -C esta
AE B
C
B-LigaB
C -LigaS
Entran todos los efectos e
A
C
D
E
D -A ngulo
E -Tope
interacciones menos AB
BC
BD
Term

B
CD
AD
AC
BE
E
CE
DE

0 200 400 600 800 1000

Standardized Effect

Ahora analizamos el modelo del disparo:

Factorial Fit: DISP versus A-Cesta, B-LigaB, C-LigaS, D-Angulo, E-Tope

Estimated Effects and Coefficients for DISP (coded units)

Term Effect Coef SE Coef T P
Constant 1.7992 0.004969 362.08 0.000
A-Cesta -0.6875 -0.3438 0.004969 -69.18 0.000
B-LigaB -0.8621 -0.4311 0.004969 -86.75 0.000
C-LigaS -1.5917 -0.7959 0.004969 -160.16 0.000
D-Angulo -1.6852 -0.8426 0.004969 -169.57 0.000
E-Tope 0.5860 0.2930 0.004969 58.96 0.000
A-Cesta*B-LigaB 0.4365 0.2182 0.004969 43.92 0.000
A-Cesta*C-LigaS 0.4510 0.2255 0.004969 45.39 0.000
A-Cesta*D-Angulo 0.1820 0.0910 0.004969 18.32 0.000
A-Cesta*E-Tope -0.3171 -0.1586 0.004969 -31.91 0.000
B-LigaB*C-LigaS 0.3715 0.1857 0.004969 37.38 0.000
B-LigaB*D-Angulo 0.3413 0.1706 0.004969 34.34 0.000
B-LigaB*E-Tope -0.1827 -0.0914 0.004969 -18.38 0.000
C-LigaS*D-Angulo 0.8690 0.4345 0.004969 87.45 0.000
C-LigaS*E-Tope -0.3126 -0.1563 0.004969 -31.46 0.000
D-Angulo*E-Tope -0.3186 -0.1593 0.004969 -32.06 0.000

S = 0.0344262 PRESS = 0.085332

R-Sq = 99.96% R-Sq(pred) = 99.92% R-Sq(adj) = 99.95%

Analysis of Variance for DISP (coded units)

Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P
Main Effects 5 83.193 83.1934 16.6387 14039.10 0.000
2-Way Interactions 10 21.240 21.2397 2.1240 1792.13 0.000
Residual Error 32 0.038 0.0379 0.0012
Pure Error 32 0.038 0.0379 0.0012
Total 47 104.471

Unusual Observations for DISP

Obs StdOrder DISP Fit SE Fit Residual St Resid
20 20 2.88800 3.00133 0.01988 -0.11333 -4.03R
35 35 2.78300 2.85100 0.01988 -0.06800 -2.42R
36 36 3.06500 3.00133 0.01988 0.06367 2.26R
R denotes an observation with a large standardized residual.

Effects Pareto for DISP

Para que nos de 2.90 ± 0.10 tenemos que colocar los factores en los siguientes niveles:

Entran todos los efectos

e interacciones
NOTA: Ángulo = -0.72 equivale a 175.8º

Una vez definidos los niveles de los factores, se realizan quince disparos agrupados en 5 subgrupos de 3
disparos cada uno y procedemos a graficar las gráficas Xbar-R y a calcular la capacidad del proceso:
Xbar-R Chart of DISP Mej.
Xbar-R Chart of DISP Mej.
2.96 1
1
U C L=2.9393
2.92
Sample M ean

_
_
2.88
X=2.8715

2.84

2.80 5 LC L=2.8038
1 2 3 4 5
Sample

U C L=0.1705
0.16
Sample Range

0.12

0.08 _
R=0.0662
0.04

0.00 LC L=0
1 2 3 4 5
Sample

Test Results for Xbar Chart of DISP Mej.

TEST 1. One point more than 3.00 standard deviations from center line.
Test Failed at points: 2, 3

TEST 5. 2 out of 3 points more than 2 standard deviations from center line (on one side of CL).
Test Failed at points: 3, 5

* WARNING * If graph is updated with new data, the results above may no longer be correct.
Probability Plot of DISP Mej.
 Probability Plot of DISP Mej.
Normal
99
Mean 2.872
StDev 0.07241
95 N 15
AD 0.619
90
P-Value 0.087
80
70
Percent

60
50
40
30
20

10

1
2.70 2.75 2.80 2.85 2.90 2.95 3.00 3.05
DISP Mej.

Process Capability of DISP Mej.

Process Capability of DISP Mej.

LSL USL
P rocess D ata Within
LS L 2.8 Ov erall
Target *
USL 3 P otential (Within) C apability
S ample M ean 2.87153 Cp 0.85
C P L 0.61
S ample N 15
C P U 1.09
S tDev (Within) 0.0391174
S tDev (O v erall) 0.0724055 C pk 0.61
O v erall C apability
Pp 0.46
PPL 0.33
PPU 0.59
P pk 0.33
C pm *

2.70 2.75 2.80 2.85 2.90 2.95 3.00

O bserv ed P erformance E xp. Within P erformance E xp. O v erall P erformance
P P M < LS L 133333.33 P P M < LS L 33723.68 P P M < LS L 161587.39
PPM > USL 0.00 PPM > USL 511.49 PPM > USL 38009.47
P P M Total 133333.33 P P M Total 34235.18 P P M Total 199596.86

Para disparar a 3.30 los factores se ponen en los siguientes niveles:

NOTA: Ángulo = 0 equivale a 165º

REPITE OK LOS TRES TIROS QUE HICIMOS!!!!

Para disparar a 3.80 los factores se ponen en los siguientes niveles:

NOTA: Ángulo = -0.365 equivale a 170.5º